6 Search Results for "Merkl, Timo Camillo"


Document
Invited Talk
Query Decompositions and All That (Invited Talk)

Authors: Kyle Deeds, Timo Camillo Merkl, Reinhard Pichler, and Dan Suciu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 365, 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)


Abstract
The close relationship between Conjunctive Queries (CQs) and Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) has long been known. Nevertheless, apart from decomposition methods, research on efficient query evaluation or constraint solving algorithms has developed rather independently. In this article, we illustrate how search algorithms originating from the CSP community can be fruitfully applied to query evaluation - either by further developing the original search algorithms or by combining them with query decomposition methods. It turns out that the resulting approaches may indeed lead to lower time and/or space complexity than previous query evaluation methods.

Cite as

Kyle Deeds, Timo Camillo Merkl, Reinhard Pichler, and Dan Suciu. Query Decompositions and All That (Invited Talk). In 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 365, pp. 1:1-1:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deeds_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.1,
  author =	{Deeds, Kyle and Merkl, Timo Camillo and Pichler, Reinhard and Suciu, Dan},
  title =	{{Query Decompositions and All That}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-413-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{365},
  editor =	{ten Cate, Balder and Funk, Maurice},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256158},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Query evaluation, Query decompositions, Complexity}
}
Document
Research
A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations

Authors: Shqiponja Ahmetaj, Robert David, Axel Polleres, and Mantas Šimkus

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 3 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 3


Abstract
The Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) is a recent standard, a W3C recommendation, for validating RDF graphs against shape constraints to be checked on target nodes of a data graph. The standard also describes the notion of validation reports, which detail the results of the validation process. In case of violation of constraints, the validation report should explain the reasons for non-validation, offering guidance on how to identify or fix violations in the data graph. Since the specification left it open to SHACL processors to define such explanations, a recent work proposed the use of explanations in the style of database repairs, where a repair is a set of additions to or deletions from the data graph so that the resulting graph validates against the constraints. In this paper, we study such repairs for non-recursive SHACL, the largest fragment of SHACL that is fully defined in the specification. We propose an algorithm to compute repairs by encoding the explanation problem - using Answer Set Programming (ASP) - into a logic program, where the answer sets contain (minimal) repairs. We then study a scenario where it is not possible to simultaneously repair all the targets, which may be the case due to overall unsatisfiability or conflicting constraints. We introduce a relaxed notion of validation, which allows to validate a (maximal) subset of the targets and adapt the ASP translation to take into account this relaxation. Finally, we add support for repairing constraints which use property paths and equality of paths. Our implementation in clingo is - to the best of our knowledge - the first implementation of a repair program for SHACL.

Cite as

Shqiponja Ahmetaj, Robert David, Axel Polleres, and Mantas Šimkus. A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 1:1-1:36, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{ahmetaj_et_al:TGDK.3.3.1,
  author =	{Ahmetaj, Shqiponja and David, Robert and Polleres, Axel and \v{S}imkus, Mantas},
  title =	{{A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{1:1--1:36},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252124},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: SHACL, Shapes Constraint Language, Database Repairs, Knowledge Graphs, Semantic Web, Answer Set Programming}
}
Document
Invited Paper
Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics Based on (Preferred) Repairs (Invited Paper)

Authors: Camille Bourgaux

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)


Abstract
Real-world datasets are plagued by data quality issues which may render the data inconsistent w.r.t. a set of constraints, be they given by database integrity constraints or ontologies. A prominent way to handle such inconsistent data is to use inconsistency-tolerant semantics to obtain meaningful answers to queries. Most of these semantics are based on some notion of repairs, which represent ways of restoring the data consistency. The most basic kind of repairs is that of subset repairs, which are maximal consistent subsets of the dataset. However, in many scenarios, one can define preferred repairs based on some preference information. These lecture notes present inconsistency-tolerant semantics, focusing on the repair-based ones, then review different kinds of preferred repairs that have been considered in the literature. We present in particular the relationships between different kinds of preferred repairs and other notions related to inconsistency handling, the computational complexity of reasoning with (preferred) repairs, and some implementations.

Cite as

Camille Bourgaux. Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics Based on (Preferred) Repairs (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 5:1-5:67, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bourgaux:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.5,
  author =	{Bourgaux, Camille},
  title =	{{Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics Based on (Preferred) Repairs}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:67},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250504},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge bases, databases, inconsistency handling, repairs, preferences}
}
Document
Invited Talk
The Quest for Faster Join Algorithms (Invited Talk)

Authors: Paraschos Koutris, Shaleen Deep, Austen Fan, and Hangdong Zhao

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 328, 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)


Abstract
Joins are the cornerstone of relational databases. Surprisingly, even after several decades of research in the systems and theory database community, we still lack an understanding of how to design the fastest possible join algorithm. In this talk, we will present the exciting progress the database theory community has achieved in join algorithms over the last two decades. The talk will revolve around five key ideas fundamentally shaping this research area: tree decompositions, data partitioning, leveraging statistical information, enumeration, and algebraic techniques.

Cite as

Paraschos Koutris, Shaleen Deep, Austen Fan, and Hangdong Zhao. The Quest for Faster Join Algorithms (Invited Talk). In 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 328, pp. 1:1-1:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koutris_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.1,
  author =	{Koutris, Paraschos and Deep, Shaleen and Fan, Austen and Zhao, Hangdong},
  title =	{{The Quest for Faster Join Algorithms}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-364-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{328},
  editor =	{Roy, Sudeepa and Kara, Ahmet},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-229428},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Conjunctive Queries, Joins, Tree Decompositions, Enumeration, Semirings}
}
Document
Partition Constraints for Conjunctive Queries: Bounds and Worst-Case Optimal Joins

Authors: Kyle Deeds and Timo Camillo Merkl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 328, 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)


Abstract
In the last decade, various works have used statistics on relations to improve both the theory and practice of conjunctive query execution. Starting with the AGM bound which took advantage of relation sizes, later works incorporated statistics like functional dependencies and degree constraints. Each new statistic prompted work along two lines; bounding the size of conjunctive query outputs and worst-case optimal join algorithms. In this work, we continue in this vein by introducing a new statistic called a partition constraint. This statistic captures latent structure within relations by partitioning them into sub-relations which each have much tighter degree constraints. We show that this approach can both refine existing cardinality bounds and improve existing worst-case optimal join algorithms.

Cite as

Kyle Deeds and Timo Camillo Merkl. Partition Constraints for Conjunctive Queries: Bounds and Worst-Case Optimal Joins. In 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 328, pp. 17:1-17:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deeds_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.17,
  author =	{Deeds, Kyle and Merkl, Timo Camillo},
  title =	{{Partition Constraints for Conjunctive Queries: Bounds and Worst-Case Optimal Joins}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-364-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{328},
  editor =	{Roy, Sudeepa and Kara, Ahmet},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-229588},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Worst-Case Optimal Joins, Cardinality Bounds, Degeneracy, Degree Constraints, Partition Constraints}
}
Document
Diversity of Answers to Conjunctive Queries

Authors: Timo Camillo Merkl, Reinhard Pichler, and Sebastian Skritek

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 255, 26th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2023)


Abstract
Enumeration problems aim at outputting, without repetition, the set of solutions to a given problem instance. However, outputting the entire solution set may be prohibitively expensive if it is too big. In this case, outputting a small, sufficiently diverse subset of the solutions would be preferable. This leads to the Diverse-version of the original enumeration problem, where the goal is to achieve a certain level d of diversity by selecting k solutions. In this paper, we look at the Diverse-version of the query answering problem for Conjunctive Queries and extensions thereof. That is, we study the problem if it is possible to achieve a certain level d of diversity by selecting k answers to the given query and, in the positive case, to actually compute such k answers.

Cite as

Timo Camillo Merkl, Reinhard Pichler, and Sebastian Skritek. Diversity of Answers to Conjunctive Queries. In 26th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 255, pp. 10:1-10:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{merkl_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2023.10,
  author =	{Merkl, Timo Camillo and Pichler, Reinhard and Skritek, Sebastian},
  title =	{{Diversity of Answers to Conjunctive Queries}},
  booktitle =	{26th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2023)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-270-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{255},
  editor =	{Geerts, Floris and Vandevoort, Brecht},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2023.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-177529},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2023.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Query Answering, Diversity of Solutions, Complexity, Algorithms}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 6 Document/PDF
  • 5 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2023

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Merkl, Timo Camillo
  • 2 Deeds, Kyle
  • 2 Pichler, Reinhard
  • 1 Ahmetaj, Shqiponja
  • 1 Bourgaux, Camille
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 1 TGDK

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Database theory
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Description logics
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Logic programming and answer set programming
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Nonmonotonic, default reasoning and belief revision
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Reasoning about belief and knowledge
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Complexity
  • 1 Algorithms
  • 1 Answer Set Programming
  • 1 Cardinality Bounds
  • 1 Conjunctive Queries
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail