4 Search Results for "Steinberger, John P."

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.116
Decentralized Data Archival: New Definitions and Constructions

Authors: Elaine Shi, Rose Silver, and Changrui Mu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We initiate the study of a new abstraction called incremental decentralized data archival (iDDA). Specifically, imagine that there is an ever-growing, massive database such as a blockchain, a comprehensive human knowledge base like Wikipedia, or the Internet archive. We want to build a decentralized archival system for such datasets to ensure long-term robustness and sustainability. We identify several important properties that an iDDA scheme should satisfy. First, to promote heterogeneity and decentralization, we want to encourage even weak nodes with limited space (e.g., users' home computers) to contribute. The minimum space requirement to contribute should be approximately independent of the data size. Second, if a collection of nodes together receive rewards commensurate with contributing a total of m blocks of space, then we want the following reassurances: 1) if m is at least the database size, we should be able to reconstruct the entire dataset; and 2) these nodes should actually be committing roughly m space in aggregate - specifically, when m is much larger than the data size, these nodes cannot store only one copy of the database, and be able to impersonate arbitrarily many pseudonyms and get unbounded rewards. We propose new definitions that mathematically formalize the aforementioned requirements of an iDDA scheme. We also devise an efficient construction in the random oracle model which satisfies the desired security requirements. Our scheme incurs only Õ(1) audit cost, as well as Õ(1) update cost for both the publisher and each node, where Õ(⋅) hides polylogarithmic factors. Further, the minimum space provisioning required to contribute is as small as polylogarithmic. Our construction exposes several interesting technical challenges. Specifically, we show that a straightforward application of the standard hierarchical data structure fails, since both our security definition and the underlying cryptographic primitives we employ lack the desired compositional guarantees. We devise novel techniques to overcome these compositional issues, resulting in a construction with provable security while still retaining efficiency. Finally, our new definitions also make a conceptual contribution, and lay the theoretical groundwork for the study of iDDA. We raise several interesting open problems along this direction.
Cite as

Elaine Shi, Rose Silver, and Changrui Mu. Decentralized Data Archival: New Definitions and Constructions. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 116:1-116:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shi_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.116,
  author =	{Shi, Elaine and Silver, Rose and Mu, Changrui},
  title =	{{Decentralized Data Archival: New Definitions and Constructions}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{116:1--116:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.116},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254037},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.116},
  annote =	{Keywords: Decentralized Data Archival}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33
A Min-Entropy Approach to Multi-Party Communication Lower Bounds

Authors: Mi-Ying (Miryam) Huang, Xinyu Mao, Shuo Wang, Guangxu Yang, and Jiapeng Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Information complexity is one of the most powerful techniques to prove information-theoretical lower bounds, in which Shannon entropy plays a central role. Though Shannon entropy has some convenient properties, such as the chain rule, it still has inherent limitations. One of the most notable barriers is the square-root loss, which appears in the square-root gap between entropy gaps and statistical distances, e.g., Pinsker’s inequality. To bypass this barrier, we introduce a new method based on min-entropy analysis. Building on this new method, we prove the following results. - An Ω(N^{∑_i α_i - max_i {α_i}}/k) randomized communication lower bound of the k-party set-intersection problem where the i-th party holds a random set of size ≈ N^{1-α_i}. - A tight Ω(n/k) randomized lower bound of the k-party Tree Pointer Jumping problems, improving an Ω(n/k²) lower bound by Chakrabarti, Cormode, and McGregor (STOC 08). - An Ω(n/k+√n) lower bound of the Chained Index problem, improving an Ω(n/k²) lower bound by Cormode, Dark, and Konrad (ICALP 19). Since these problems served as hard problems for numerous applications in streaming lower bounds and cryptography, our new lower bounds directly improve these streaming lower bounds and cryptography lower bounds. On the technical side, min-entropy does not have nice properties such as the chain rule. To address this issue, we enhance the structure-vs-pseudorandomness decomposition used by Göös, Pitassi, and Watson (FOCS 17) and Yang and Zhang (STOC 24); both papers used this decomposition to prove communication lower bounds. In this paper, we give a new breath to this method in the multi-party setting, presenting a new toolkit for proving multi-party communication lower bounds.
Cite as

Mi-Ying (Miryam) Huang, Xinyu Mao, Shuo Wang, Guangxu Yang, and Jiapeng Zhang. A Min-Entropy Approach to Multi-Party Communication Lower Bounds. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 33:1-33:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{huang_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33,
  author =	{Huang, Mi-Ying (Miryam) and Mao, Xinyu and Wang, Shuo and Yang, Guangxu and Zhang, Jiapeng},
  title =	{{A Min-Entropy Approach to Multi-Party Communication Lower Bounds}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237273},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: communication complexity, lifting theorems, set intersection, chained index}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14
Algorithms for the Diverse-k-SAT Problem: The Geometry of Satisfying Assignments

Authors: Per Austrin, Ioana O. Bercea, Mayank Goswami, Nutan Limaye, and Adarsh Srinivasan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
Given a k-CNF formula and an integer s ≥ 2, we study algorithms that obtain s solutions to the formula that are as dispersed as possible. For s = 2, this problem of computing the diameter of a k-CNF formula was initiated by Creszenzi and Rossi, who showed strong hardness results even for k = 2. The current best upper bound [Angelsmark and Thapper '04] goes to 4ⁿ as k → ∞. As our first result, we show that this quadratic blow up is not necessary by utilizing the Fast-Fourier transform (FFT) to give a O^*(2ⁿ) time exact algorithm for computing the diameter of any k-CNF formula. For s > 2, the problem was raised in the SAT community (Nadel '11) and several heuristics have been proposed for it, but no algorithms with theoretical guarantees are known. We give exact algorithms using FFT and clique-finding that run in O^*(2^{(s-1)n}) and O^*(s² |Ω_{𝐅}|^{ω ⌈ s/3 ⌉}) respectively, where |Ω_{𝐅}| is the size of the solutions space of the formula 𝐅 and ω is the matrix multiplication exponent. However, current SAT algorithms for finding one solution run in time O^*(2^{ε_{k}n}) for ε_{k} ≈ 1-Θ(1/k), which is much faster than all above run times. As our main result, we analyze two popular SAT algorithms - PPZ (Paturi, Pudlák, Zane '97) and Schöning’s ('02) algorithms, and show that in time poly(s)O^*(2^{ε_{k}n}), they can be used to approximate diameter as well as the dispersion (s > 2) problem. While we need to modify Schöning’s original algorithm for technical reasons, we show that the PPZ algorithm, without any modification, samples solutions in a geometric sense. We believe this geometric sampling property of PPZ may be of independent interest. Finally, we focus on diverse solutions to NP-complete optimization problems, and give bi-approximations running in time poly(s)O^*(2^{ε n}) with ε < 1 for several problems such as Maximum Independent Set, Minimum Vertex Cover, Minimum Hitting Set, Feedback Vertex Set, Multicut on Trees and Interval Vertex Deletion. For all of these problems, all existing exact methods for finding optimal diverse solutions have a runtime with at least an exponential dependence on the number of solutions s. Our methods show that by relaxing to bi-approximations, this dependence on s can be made polynomial.
Cite as

Per Austrin, Ioana O. Bercea, Mayank Goswami, Nutan Limaye, and Adarsh Srinivasan. Algorithms for the Diverse-k-SAT Problem: The Geometry of Satisfying Assignments. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 14:1-14:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{austrin_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14,
  author =	{Austrin, Per and Bercea, Ioana O. and Goswami, Mayank and Limaye, Nutan and Srinivasan, Adarsh},
  title =	{{Algorithms for the Diverse-k-SAT Problem: The Geometry of Satisfying Assignments}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233916},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Exponential time algorithms, Satisfiability, k-SAT, PPZ, Sch\"{o}ning, Dispersion, Diversity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.9
PPSZ for General k-SAT - Making Hertli's Analysis Simpler and 3-SAT Faster

Authors: Dominik Scheder and John P. Steinberger

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 79, 32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017)

Abstract
The currently fastest known algorithm for k-SAT is PPSZ named after its inventors Paturi, Pudlak, Saks, and Zane. Analyzing its running time is much easier for input formulas with a unique satisfying assignment. In this paper, we achieve three goals. First, we simplify Hertli's analysis for input formulas with multiple satisfying assignments. Second, we show a "translation result": if you improve PPSZ for k-CNF formulas with a unique satisfying assignment, you will immediately get a (weaker) improvement for general k-CNF formulas. Combining this with a result by Hertli from 2014, in which he gives an algorithm for Unique-3-SAT slightly beating PPSZ, we obtain an algorithm beating PPSZ for general 3-SAT, thus obtaining the so far best known worst-case bounds for 3-SAT.
Cite as

Dominik Scheder and John P. Steinberger. PPSZ for General k-SAT - Making Hertli's Analysis Simpler and 3-SAT Faster. In 32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 79, pp. 9:1-9:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{scheder_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2017.9,
  author =	{Scheder, Dominik and Steinberger, John P.},
  title =	{{PPSZ for General k-SAT - Making Hertli's Analysis Simpler and 3-SAT Faster}},
  booktitle =	{32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-040-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{79},
  editor =	{O'Donnell, Ryan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-75355},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Boolean satisfiability, exponential algorithms, randomized algorithms}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 4 Document/PDF
  • 3 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2017

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Austrin, Per
  • 1 Bercea, Ioana O.
  • 1 Goswami, Mayank
  • 1 Huang, Mi-Ying (Miryam)
  • 1 Limaye, Nutan
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Security and privacy → Mathematical foundations of cryptography
  • 1 Theory of computation → Communication complexity
  • 1 Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Boolean satisfiability
  • 1 Decentralized Data Archival
  • 1 Dispersion
  • 1 Diversity
  • 1 Exponential time algorithms
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact