Search Results

Documents authored by Tutas, Malte

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.48
The Support of Bin Packing Is Exponential

Authors: Klaus Jansen, Lis Pirotton, and Malte Tutas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
Consider the classical Bin Packing problem with d different item sizes s_i and amounts of items a_i. The support of a Bin Packing solution is the number of differently filled bins. In this work, we show that the lower bound on the support of this problem is 2^Ω(d). Our lower bound matches the upper bound of 2^d given by Eisenbrand and Shmonin [Oper.Research Letters '06] up to a constant factor. This result has direct implications for the time complexity of several Bin Packing algorithms, such as Goemans and Rothvoss [SODA '14], Jansen and Klein [SODA '17] and Jansen and Solis-Oba [IPCO '10]. To achieve our main result, we develop a technique to aggregate equality constrained ILPs with many constraints into an equivalent ILP with one constraint. Our technique contrasts existing aggregation techniques as we manage to integrate upper bounds on variables into the resulting constraint. We believe this technique can be useful for solving general ILPs or the d-dimensional knapsack problem.
Cite as

Klaus Jansen, Lis Pirotton, and Malte Tutas. The Support of Bin Packing Is Exponential. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 48:1-48:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jansen_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.48,
  author =	{Jansen, Klaus and Pirotton, Lis and Tutas, Malte},
  title =	{{The Support of Bin Packing Is Exponential}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{48:1--48:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.48},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245167},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.48},
  annote =	{Keywords: Bin Packing, Integer Programming, Support}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.60
Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Knapsack

Authors: Klaus Jansen, Debajyoti Kar, Arindam Khan, K. V. N. Sreenivas, and Malte Tutas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 332, 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)

Abstract
We study the three-dimensional Knapsack (3DK) problem, in which we are given a set of axis-aligned cuboids with associated profits and an axis-aligned cube knapsack. The objective is to find a non-overlapping axis-aligned packing (by translation) of the maximum profit subset of cuboids into the cube. The previous best approximation algorithm is due to Diedrich, Harren, Jansen, Thöle, and Thomas (2008), who gave a (7+ε)-approximation algorithm for 3DK and a (5+ε)-approximation algorithm for the variant when the items can be rotated by 90 degrees around any axis, for any constant ε > 0. Chlebík and Chlebíková (2009) showed that the problem does not admit an asymptotic polynomial-time approximation scheme. We provide an improved polynomial-time (139/29+ε) ≈ 4.794-approximation algorithm for 3DK and (30/7+ε) ≈ 4.286-approximation when rotations by 90 degrees are allowed. We also provide improved approximation algorithms for several variants such as the cardinality case (when all items have the same profit) and uniform profit-density case (when the profit of an item is equal to its volume). Our key technical contribution is container packing - a structured packing in 3D such that all items are assigned into a constant number of containers, and each container is packed using a specific strategy based on its type. We first show the existence of highly profitable container packings. Thereafter, we show that one can find near-optimal container packing efficiently using a variant of the Generalized Assignment Problem (GAP).
Cite as

Klaus Jansen, Debajyoti Kar, Arindam Khan, K. V. N. Sreenivas, and Malte Tutas. Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Knapsack. In 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 332, pp. 60:1-60:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jansen_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.60,
  author =	{Jansen, Klaus and Kar, Debajyoti and Khan, Arindam and Sreenivas, K. V. N. and Tutas, Malte},
  title =	{{Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Knapsack}},
  booktitle =	{41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)},
  pages =	{60:1--60:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-370-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{332},
  editor =	{Aichholzer, Oswin and Wang, Haitao},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.60},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232126},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.60},
  annote =	{Keywords: Approximation Algorithms, Hyperrectangle Packing, Multidimensional Knapsack, Three-dimensional Packing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2024.13
3/2-Dual Approximation for CPU/GPU Scheduling

Authors: Bernhard Sebastian Germann, Klaus Jansen, Felix Ohnesorge, and Malte Tutas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 301, 22nd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2024)

Abstract
We present a fast and efficient 3/2 dual approximation algorithm for CPU/GPU scheduling under the objective of makespan minimization. In CPU/GPU scheduling tasks can be scheduled on two different architectures. When executed on the CPU, a task is moldable and can be assigned to multiple cores. The running time becomes a function in the assigned cores. On a GPU, the task is a classical job with a set processing time. Both settings have drawn recent independent scientific interest. For the moldable CPU scheduling, the current best known constant rate approximation is a 3/2 approximation algorithm [Wu et al. EJOR volume 306]. The best efficient algorithm for this setting is a 3/2+ε approximation [Mounie et al. SIAM '07] whereas GPU scheduling admits a 13/11 approximation [Coffman, Garey, Johnson SIAM'78]. We improve upon the current best known algorithms for CPU/GPU scheduling by Bleuse et al. by formulating a novel multidimensional multiple choice knapsack to allot tasks to either architecture and schedule them there with known algorithms. This yields an improved running time over the current state of the art. We complement our theoretical results with experimentation that shows a significant speedup by using practical optimizations and explore their efficacy.
Cite as

Bernhard Sebastian Germann, Klaus Jansen, Felix Ohnesorge, and Malte Tutas. 3/2-Dual Approximation for CPU/GPU Scheduling. In 22nd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 301, pp. 13:1-13:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{germann_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2024.13,
  author =	{Germann, Bernhard Sebastian and Jansen, Klaus and Ohnesorge, Felix and Tutas, Malte},
  title =	{{3/2-Dual Approximation for CPU/GPU Scheduling}},
  booktitle =	{22nd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2024)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-325-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{301},
  editor =	{Liberti, Leo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2024.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203782},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2024.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: computing, machine scheduling, moldable, CPU/GPU}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.21
Peak Demand Minimization via Sliced Strip Packing

Authors: Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen, Arindam Khan, Malin Rau, and Malte Tutas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 207, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021)

Abstract
We study the Nonpreemptive Peak Demand Minimization (NPDM) problem, where we are given a set of jobs, specified by their processing times and energy requirements. The goal is to schedule all jobs within a fixed time period such that the peak load (the maximum total energy requirement at any time) is minimized. This problem has recently received significant attention due to its relevance in smart-grids. Theoretically, the problem is related to the classical strip packing problem (SP). In SP, a given set of axis-aligned rectangles must be packed into a fixed-width strip, such that the height of the strip is minimized. NPDM can be modeled as strip packing with slicing and stacking constraint: each rectangle may be cut vertically into multiple slices and the slices may be packed into the strip as individual pieces. The stacking constraint forbids solutions where two slices of the same rectangle are intersected by the same vertical line. Nonpreemption enforces the slices to be placed in contiguous horizontal locations (but may be placed at different vertical locations). We obtain a (5/3+ε)-approximation algorithm for the problem. We also provide an asymptotic efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (AEPTAS) which generates a schedule for almost all jobs with energy consumption (1+ε) OPT. The remaining jobs fit into a thin container of height 1. The previous best result for NPDM was a 2.7 approximation based on FFDH [Ranjan et al., 2015]. One of our key ideas is providing several new lower bounds on the optimal solution of a geometric packing, which could be useful in other related problems. These lower bounds help us to obtain approximative solutions based on Steinberg’s algorithm in many cases. In addition, we show how to split schedules generated by the AEPTAS into few segments and to rearrange the corresponding jobs to insert the thin container mentioned above.
Cite as

Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen, Arindam Khan, Malin Rau, and Malte Tutas. Peak Demand Minimization via Sliced Strip Packing. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 207, pp. 21:1-21:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deppert_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.21,
  author =	{Deppert, Max A. and Jansen, Klaus and Khan, Arindam and Rau, Malin and Tutas, Malte},
  title =	{{Peak Demand Minimization via Sliced Strip Packing}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-207-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{207},
  editor =	{Wootters, Mary and Sanit\`{a}, Laura},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-147145},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: scheduling, peak demand minimization, approximation}
}
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact