43 Search Results for "Ariola, Zena M."


Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 167

5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)

FSCD 2020, June 29 to July 6, 2020, Paris, France (Virtual Conference)

Editors: Zena M. Ariola

Document
Invited Talk
Duality in Action (Invited Talk)

Authors: Paul Downen and Zena M. Ariola

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 195, 6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021)


Abstract
The duality between "true" and "false" is a hallmark feature of logic. We show how this duality can be put to use in the theory and practice of programming languages and their implementations, too. Starting from a foundation of constructive logic as dialogues, we illustrate how it describes a symmetric language for computation, and survey several applications of the dualities found therein.

Cite as

Paul Downen and Zena M. Ariola. Duality in Action (Invited Talk). In 6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 195, pp. 1:1-1:32, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{downen_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.1,
  author =	{Downen, Paul and Ariola, Zena M.},
  title =	{{Duality in Action}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:32},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-191-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{195},
  editor =	{Kobayashi, Naoki},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-142390},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Duality, Logic, Curry-Howard, Sequent Calculus, Rewriting, Compilation}
}
Document
Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 167, FSCD 2020, Complete Volume

Authors: Zena M. Ariola

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 167, FSCD 2020, Complete Volume

Cite as

Zena M. Ariola. LIPIcs, Volume 167, FSCD 2020, Complete Volume. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 1-732, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{ariola:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 167, FSCD 2020, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{1--732},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123219},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020},
  annote =	{Keywords: LIPIcs, Volume 167, FSCD 2020, Complete Volume}
}
Document
Front Matter
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Authors: Zena M. Ariola

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Cite as

Zena M. Ariola. Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 0:i-0:xx, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ariola:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.0,
  author =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:xx},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123228},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Solvability in a Probabilistic Setting (Invited Talk)

Authors: Simona Ronchi Della Rocca, Ugo Dal Lago, and Claudia Faggian

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
The notion of solvability, crucial in the λ-calculus, is conservatively extended to a probabilistic setting, and a complete characterization of it is given. The employed technical tool is a type assignment system, based on non-idempotent intersection types, whose typable terms turn out to be precisely the terms which are solvable with nonnull probability. We also supply an operational characterization of solvable terms, through the notion of head normal form, and a denotational model of Λ_⊕, itself induced by the type system, which equates all the unsolvable terms.

Cite as

Simona Ronchi Della Rocca, Ugo Dal Lago, and Claudia Faggian. Solvability in a Probabilistic Setting (Invited Talk). In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 1:1-1:17, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ronchidellarocca_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.1,
  author =	{Ronchi Della Rocca, Simona and Dal Lago, Ugo and Faggian, Claudia},
  title =	{{Solvability in a Probabilistic Setting}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123237},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Probabilistic Computation, Lambda Calculus, Solvability, Intersection Types}
}
Document
Invited Talk
A Modal Analysis of Metaprogramming, Revisited (Invited Talk)

Authors: Brigitte Pientka

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Metaprogramming is the art of writing programs that produce or manipulate other programs. This opens the possibility to eliminate boilerplate code and exploit domain-specific knowledge to build high-performance programs. Unfortunately, designing language extensions to support type-safe multi-staged metaprogramming remains very challenging. In this talk, we outline a modal type-theoretic foundation for multi-staged metaprogramming which supports the generation and the analysis of polymorphic code. It has two main ingredients: first, we exploit contextual modal types to describe open code together with the context in which it is meaningful; second, we model code as a higher-order abstract syntax (HOAS) tree within a context. These two ideas provide the appropriate abstractions for both generating and pattern matching on open code without committing to a concrete representation of variable binding and contexts. Our work is a first step towards building a general type-theoretic foundation for multi-staged metaprogramming which on the one hand enforces strong type guarantees and on the other hand makes it easy to generate and manipulate code. This will allow us to exploit the full potential of metaprogramming without sacrificing reliability of and trust in the code we are producing and running.

Cite as

Brigitte Pientka. A Modal Analysis of Metaprogramming, Revisited (Invited Talk). In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 2:1-2:3, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pientka:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.2,
  author =	{Pientka, Brigitte},
  title =	{{A Modal Analysis of Metaprogramming, Revisited}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:3},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123242},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Type systems, Metaprogramming, Modal Type System}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Quotients in Dependent Type Theory (Invited Talk)

Authors: Andrew M. Pitts

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Constructs that involve taking a quotient are commonplace in mathematics. Here I will consider how they are treated within dependent type theory. The notion of quotient type has its origins in the Nuprl theorem-proving system [R. L. Constable et al., 1986] for extensional type theory. Later Hofmann formulated a version for intensional type theory in his thesis [M. Hofmann, 1995]. This depends on having a pre-existing notion of intensional identity type. Hofmann used Martin-Löf’s notion, the indexed family inductively generated from proofs of reflexivity [B. Nordström et al., 1990]. The recent homotopical view of identity in terms of path types [The Univalent Foundations Program, 2013] gives a more liberal perspective and has brought with it the notion of higher inductive type (HIT) [P. L. Lumsdaine and M. Shulman, 2019], subsuming both inductive and quotient types. Inductively defined indexed families of types (in all their various forms) are perhaps the most useful concept that dependent type theory has contributed to the practice of computer assistance for formalizing mathematical proofs. However, it is often the case that a particular application of such types needs not only to inductively generate a collection of objects, but also to make identifications between the objects. In classical mathematics one can first generate and then identify, using the Axiom of Choice to lift infinitary constructions to the quotient. HITs can allow one to avoid such non-constructive uses of choice by inter-twining generation and identification. Perhaps more important than the constructive/non-constructive issue is that simultaneously declaring how to generate and how to identify can be a very natural way of defining some construct from the user’s point of view. This is why HITs promise to be so useful, once we have robust and convenient mechanisms in theorem-proving systems for defining HITs and defining functions out of HITs. Although some HITs have been axiomatized in various systems, at the moment the only system I know of with built in support for defining quite general forms of HIT and using them is the implementation of cubical type theory [C. Cohen et al., 2018] within recent versions of the Agda system [A. Vezzosi et al., 2019]. The higher dimensional aspect of identity in cubical type theory is fascinating; nevertheless, the simpler one-dimensional version of identity, in which one has uniqueness of identity proofs (UIP), is adequate for many applications. Although some regard UIP as a bug of early versions of Agda with it’s original form of dependent pattern matching [T. Coquand, 1992], it is by choice a feature of the Lean prover [J. Avigad et al., 2020]. Altenkirch and Kaposi [T. Altenkirch and A. Kaposi, 2016] have termed the one-dimensional version of HITs quotient inductive types (QITs) and they promise to be very useful even in the setting of type theory with UIP. In this talk I survey some of these developments, including a recent reduction of QITs to quotients [M. P. Fiore et al., 2020], and the prospects for better support in theorem-provers for quotient constructions.

Cite as

Andrew M. Pitts. Quotients in Dependent Type Theory (Invited Talk). In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 3:1-3:2, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pitts:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.3,
  author =	{Pitts, Andrew M.},
  title =	{{Quotients in Dependent Type Theory}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123256},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: dependent type theory, quotient, quotient inductive type, theorem-proving systems}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Certifying the Weighted Path Order (Invited Talk)

Authors: René Thiemann, Jonas Schöpf, Christian Sternagel, and Akihisa Yamada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
The weighted path order (WPO) unifies and extends several termination proving techniques that are known in term rewriting. Consequently, the first tool implementing WPO could prove termination of rewrite systems for which all previous tools failed. However, we should not blindly trust such results, since there might be problems with the implementation or the paper proof of WPO. In this work, we increase the reliability of these automatically generated proofs. To this end, we first formally prove the properties of WPO in Isabelle/HOL, and then develop a verified algorithm to certify termination proofs that are generated by tools using WPO. We also include support for max-polynomial interpretations, an important ingredient in WPO. Here we establish a connection to an existing verified SMT solver. Moreover, we extend the termination tools NaTT and TTT2, so that they can now generate certifiable WPO proofs.

Cite as

René Thiemann, Jonas Schöpf, Christian Sternagel, and Akihisa Yamada. Certifying the Weighted Path Order (Invited Talk). In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 4:1-4:20, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{thiemann_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.4,
  author =	{Thiemann, Ren\'{e} and Sch\"{o}pf, Jonas and Sternagel, Christian and Yamada, Akihisa},
  title =	{{Certifying the Weighted Path Order}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123263},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: certification, Isabelle/HOL, reduction order, termination analysis}
}
Document
Efficient Full Higher-Order Unification

Authors: Petar Vukmirović, Alexander Bentkamp, and Visa Nummelin

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
We developed a procedure to enumerate complete sets of higher-order unifiers based on work by Jensen and Pietrzykowski. Our procedure removes many redundant unifiers by carefully restricting the search space and tightly integrating decision procedures for fragments that admit a finite complete set of unifiers. We identify a new such fragment and describe a procedure for computing its unifiers. Our unification procedure is implemented in the Zipperposition theorem prover. Experimental evaluation shows a clear advantage over Jensen and Pietrzykowski’s procedure.

Cite as

Petar Vukmirović, Alexander Bentkamp, and Visa Nummelin. Efficient Full Higher-Order Unification. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 5:1-5:17, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vukmirovic_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.5,
  author =	{Vukmirovi\'{c}, Petar and Bentkamp, Alexander and Nummelin, Visa},
  title =	{{Efficient Full Higher-Order Unification}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123271},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: unification, higher-order logic, theorem proving, term rewriting, indexing data structures}
}
Document
Comprehension and Quotient Structures in the Language of 2-Categories

Authors: Paul-André Melliès and Nicolas Rolland

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Lawvere observed in his celebrated work on hyperdoctrines that the set-theoretic schema of comprehension can be elegantly expressed in the functorial language of categorical logic, as a comprehension structure on the functor p:E→ B defining the hyperdoctrine. In this paper, we formulate and study a strictly ordered hierarchy of three notions of comprehension structure on a given functor p:E→ B, which we call (i) comprehension structure, (ii) comprehension structure with section, and (iii) comprehension structure with image. Our approach is 2-categorical and we thus formulate the three levels of comprehension structure on a general morphism p:𝐄→𝐁 in a 2-category K. This conceptual point of view on comprehension structures enables us to revisit the work by Fumex, Ghani and Johann on the duality between comprehension structures and quotient structures on a given functor p:E→B. In particular, we show how to lift the comprehension and quotient structures on a functor p:E→ B to the categories of algebras or coalgebras associated to functors F_E:E→E and F_B:B→B of interest, in order to interpret reasoning by induction and coinduction in the traditional language of categorical logic, formulated in an appropriate 2-categorical way.

Cite as

Paul-André Melliès and Nicolas Rolland. Comprehension and Quotient Structures in the Language of 2-Categories. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 6:1-6:18, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mellies_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.6,
  author =	{Melli\`{e}s, Paul-Andr\'{e} and Rolland, Nicolas},
  title =	{{Comprehension and Quotient Structures in the Language of 2-Categories}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123282},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Comprehension structures, quotient structures, comprehension structures with section, comprehension structures with image, 2-categories, formal adjunctions, path objects, categorical logic, inductive reasoning on algebras, coinductive reasoning on coalgebras}
}
Document
A Complete Normal-Form Bisimilarity for Algebraic Effects and Handlers

Authors: Dariusz Biernacki, Sergueï Lenglet, and Piotr Polesiuk

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
We present a complete coinductive syntactic theory for an untyped calculus of algebraic operations and handlers, a relatively recent concept that augments a programming language with unprecedented flexibility to define, combine and interpret computational effects. Our theory takes the form of a normal-form bisimilarity and its soundness w.r.t. contextual equivalence hinges on using so-called context variables to test evaluation contexts comprising normal forms other than values. The theory is formulated in purely syntactic elementary terms and its completeness demonstrates the discriminating power of handlers. It crucially takes advantage of the clean separation of effect handling code from effect raising construct, a distinctive feature of algebraic effects, not present in other closely related control structures such as delimited-control operators.

Cite as

Dariusz Biernacki, Sergueï Lenglet, and Piotr Polesiuk. A Complete Normal-Form Bisimilarity for Algebraic Effects and Handlers. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 7:1-7:22, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{biernacki_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.7,
  author =	{Biernacki, Dariusz and Lenglet, Sergue\"{i} and Polesiuk, Piotr},
  title =	{{A Complete Normal-Form Bisimilarity for Algebraic Effects and Handlers}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123295},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: algebraic effect, handler, behavioral equivalence, bisimilarity}
}
Document
Pomsets with Boxes: Protection, Separation, and Locality in Concurrent Kleene Algebra

Authors: Paul Brunet and David Pym

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Concurrent Kleene Algebra is an elegant tool for equational reasoning about concurrent programs. An important feature of concurrent programs that is missing from CKA is the ability to restrict legal interleavings. To remedy this we extend the standard model of CKA, namely pomsets, with a new feature, called boxes, which can specify that part of the system is protected from outside interference. We study the algebraic properties of this new model. Another drawback of CKA is that the language used for expressing properties of programs is the same as that which is used to express programs themselves. This is often too restrictive for practical purposes. We provide a logic, "pomset logic", that is an assertion language for specifying such properties, and which is interpreted on pomsets with boxes. In contrast with other approaches, this logic is not state-based, but rather characterizes the runtime behaviour of a program. We develop the basic metatheory for the relationship between pomset logic and CKA, including frame rules to support local reasoning, and illustrate this relationship with simple examples.

Cite as

Paul Brunet and David Pym. Pomsets with Boxes: Protection, Separation, and Locality in Concurrent Kleene Algebra. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 8:1-8:16, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brunet_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.8,
  author =	{Brunet, Paul and Pym, David},
  title =	{{Pomsets with Boxes: Protection, Separation, and Locality in Concurrent Kleene Algebra}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123308},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Concurrent Kleene Algebra, Pomsets, Atomicity, Semantics, Separation, Local reasoning, Bunched logic, Frame rules}
}
Document
Undecidability of Semi-Unification on a Napkin

Authors: Andrej Dudenhefner

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Semi-unification (unification combined with matching) has been proven undecidable by Kfoury, Tiuryn, and Urzyczyn in the 1990s. The original argument reduces Turing machine immortality via Turing machine boundedness to semi-unification. The latter part is technically most challenging, involving several intermediate models of computation. This work presents a novel, simpler reduction from Turing machine boundedness to semi-unification. In contrast to the original argument, we directly translate boundedness to solutions of semi-unification and vice versa. In addition, the reduction is mechanized in the Coq proof assistant, relying on a mechanization-friendly stack machine model that corresponds to space-bounded Turing machines. Taking advantage of the simpler proof, the mechanization is comparatively short and fully constructive.

Cite as

Andrej Dudenhefner. Undecidability of Semi-Unification on a Napkin. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 9:1-9:16, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dudenhefner:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.9,
  author =	{Dudenhefner, Andrej},
  title =	{{Undecidability of Semi-Unification on a Napkin}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123311},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: undecidability, semi-unification, mechanization}
}
Document
Conditional Bisimilarity for Reactive Systems

Authors: Mathias Hülsbusch, Barbara König, Sebastian Küpper, and Lara Stoltenow

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Reactive systems à la Leifer and Milner, an abstract categorical framework for rewriting, provide a suitable framework for deriving bisimulation congruences. This is done by synthesizing interactions with the environment in order to obtain a compositional semantics. We enrich the notion of reactive systems by conditions on two levels: first, as in earlier work, we consider rules enriched with application conditions and second, we investigate the notion of conditional bisimilarity. Conditional bisimilarity allows us to say that two system states are bisimilar provided that the environment satisfies a given condition. We present several equivalent definitions of conditional bisimilarity, including one that is useful for concrete proofs and that employs an up-to-context technique, and we compare with related behavioural equivalences. We instantiate reactive systems in order to obtain DPO graph rewriting and consider a case study in this setting.

Cite as

Mathias Hülsbusch, Barbara König, Sebastian Küpper, and Lara Stoltenow. Conditional Bisimilarity for Reactive Systems. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 10:1-10:19, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hulsbusch_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.10,
  author =	{H\"{u}lsbusch, Mathias and K\"{o}nig, Barbara and K\"{u}pper, Sebastian and Stoltenow, Lara},
  title =	{{Conditional Bisimilarity for Reactive Systems}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123322},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: conditional bisimilarity, reactive systems, up-to context, graph transformation}
}
Document
A Fast Decision Procedure For Uniqueness of Normal Forms w.r.t. Conversion of Shallow Term Rewriting Systems

Authors: Masaomi Yamaguchi and Takahito Aoto

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)


Abstract
Uniqueness of normal forms w.r.t. conversion (UNC) of term rewriting systems (TRSs) guarantees that there are no distinct convertible normal forms. It was recently shown that the UNC property of TRSs is decidable for shallow TRSs (Radcliffe et al., 2010). The existing procedure mainly consists of testing whether there exists a counterexample in a finite set of candidates; however, the procedure suffers a bottleneck of having a sheer number of such candidates. In this paper, we propose a new procedure which consists of checking a smaller number of such candidates and enumerating such candidates more efficiently. Correctness of the proposed procedure is proved and its complexity is analyzed. Furthermore, these two procedures have been implemented and it is experimentally confirmed that the proposed procedure runs much faster than the existing procedure.

Cite as

Masaomi Yamaguchi and Takahito Aoto. A Fast Decision Procedure For Uniqueness of Normal Forms w.r.t. Conversion of Shallow Term Rewriting Systems. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 11:1-11:23, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yamaguchi_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.11,
  author =	{Yamaguchi, Masaomi and Aoto, Takahito},
  title =	{{A Fast Decision Procedure For Uniqueness of Normal Forms w.r.t. Conversion of Shallow Term Rewriting Systems}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123338},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: uniqueness of normal forms w.r.t. conversion, shallow term rewriting systems, decision procedure}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 4 Ariola, Zena M.
  • 3 Kobayashi, Naoki
  • 2 Asada, Kazuyuki
  • 2 Biernacki, Dariusz
  • 2 Blanqui, Frédéric
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 13 Theory of computation → Type theory
  • 7 Theory of computation → Equational logic and rewriting
  • 7 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 6 Theory of computation → Semantics and reasoning
  • 5 Theory of computation → Lambda calculus
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Agda
  • 2 Metaprogramming
  • 2 Rewriting
  • 2 rewriting
  • 1 2-categories
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 42 document
  • 1 volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 40 2020
  • 1 2014
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2021

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail