21 Search Results for "Girish, Uma"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.70
Unconditional Pseudorandomness Against Shallow Quantum Circuits

Authors: Soumik Ghosh, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian, and Wei Zhan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Quantum computational pseudorandomness has emerged as a fundamental notion that spans connections to complexity theory, cryptography and fundamental physics. However, all known constructions of efficient quantum-secure pseudorandom objects rely on complexity theoretic assumptions. In this work, we establish the first unconditionally secure efficient pseudorandom constructions against shallow-depth quantum circuit classes. We prove that: - Any quantum state 2-design yields unconditional pseudorandomness against both QNC⁰ circuits with arbitrarily many ancillae and AC⁰∘QNC⁰ circuits with nearly linear ancillae. - Random phased subspace states, where the phases are picked using a 4-wise independent function, are unconditionally pseudoentangled against the above circuit classes. - Any unitary 2-design yields unconditionally secure parallel-query pseudorandom unitaries against geometrically local QNC⁰ adversaries, even with limited AC⁰ postprocessing. Our results stand in stark contrast to the standard guarantee of the 2-design property, which only ensures that they cannot be distinguished from Haar random ensembles using two copies or queries. Our work demonstrates that quantum computational pseudorandomness can be achieved unconditionally for natural classes of restricted adversaries, opening new directions in quantum complexity theory.
Cite as

Soumik Ghosh, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian, and Wei Zhan. Unconditional Pseudorandomness Against Shallow Quantum Circuits. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 70:1-70:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ghosh_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.70,
  author =	{Ghosh, Soumik and Subramanian, Sathyawageeswar and Zhan, Wei},
  title =	{{Unconditional Pseudorandomness Against Shallow Quantum Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{70:1--70:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.70},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253578},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.70},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum pseudorandomness, shallow quantum circuits, pseudorandomness, t-designs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.72
Forrelation Is Extremally Hard

Authors: Uma Girish and Rocco Servedio

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The Forrelation problem is a central problem that demonstrates an exponential separation between quantum and classical capabilities. In this problem, given query access to n-bit Boolean functions f and g, the goal is to estimate the Forrelation function forr(f,g), which measures the correlation between g and the Fourier transform of f. In this work we provide a new linear algebraic perspective on the Forrelation problem, as opposed to prior analytic approaches. We establish a connection between the Forrelation problem and bent Boolean functions and through this connection, analyze an extremal version of the Forrelation problem where the goal is to distinguish between extremal instances of Forrelation, namely (f,g) with forr(f,g) = 1 and forr(f,g) = -1. We show that this problem can be solved with one quantum query and success probability one, yet requires Ω̃(2^{n/4}) classical randomized queries, even for algorithms with a one-third failure probability, highlighting the remarkable power of one exact quantum query. We also study a restricted variant of this problem where the inputs f,g are computable by small classical circuits and show classical hardness under cryptographic assumptions.
Cite as

Uma Girish and Rocco Servedio. Forrelation Is Extremally Hard. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 72:1-72:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{girish_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.72,
  author =	{Girish, Uma and Servedio, Rocco},
  title =	{{Forrelation Is Extremally Hard}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{72:1--72:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.72},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253594},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.72},
  annote =	{Keywords: Forrelation, exact quantum, query complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.34
Testing Classical Properties from Quantum Data

Authors: Matthias C. Caro, Preksha Naik, and Joseph Slote

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Many properties of Boolean functions can be tested far more efficiently than the function itself can be learned. However, this dramatic advantage often disappears when testers are limited to random samples of f instead of adaptively chosen queries to f. In this work we investigate the quantum version of this restriction: quantum algorithms that test properties of a Boolean function f solely from copies of either the function state |f⟩∝ ∑_x|x,f(x)⟩ or the phase state |(-1)^f⟩∝ ∑_x (-1)^{f(x)}|x⟩. Quantum advantage in testing from data. For monotonicity, symmetry, and triangle-freeness, we show passive quantum testers are unboundedly or super-polynomially better than their classical passive testing counterparts. They are competitive with classic query-based testers in each case. Inadequacy of Fourier sampling. Our new testers use techniques beyond quantum Fourier sampling, and it turns out this is necessary: we show a certain class of bent functions can be tested from 𝒪(1) function states but has a sample complexity lower bound of 2^{Ω(n)} for any tester relying exclusively on Fourier and classical samples. Classical queries vs. quantum data. Our passive quantum testers are competitive with classical query-based testers, but this isn't universal: we exhibit a testing problem that can be solved from 𝒪(1) classical queries but requires Ω(2^{n/2}) function state copies. The Forrelation problem provides a separation of the same magnitude in the opposite direction, so we conclude that quantum data and classical queries are "maximally incomparable" resources for testing. Towards lower bounds. We also begin the study of lower bounds for testing from quantum data. For quantum monotonicity testing, we prove that the ensembles of [Goldreich et al., 2000; Black, 2024], which give exponential lower bounds for classical sample-based testing, do not yield any nontrivial lower bounds for testing from quantum data. New insights specific to quantum data will be required for proving copy complexity lower bounds for testing in this model.
Cite as

Matthias C. Caro, Preksha Naik, and Joseph Slote. Testing Classical Properties from Quantum Data. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 34:1-34:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{caro_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.34,
  author =	{Caro, Matthias C. and Naik, Preksha and Slote, Joseph},
  title =	{{Testing Classical Properties from Quantum Data}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253213},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum Property Testing, Quantum Data, Boolean Functions}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.66
Testing Isomorphism of Boolean Functions over Finite Abelian Groups

Authors: Swarnalipa Datta, Arijit Ghosh, Chandrima Kayal, Manaswi Paraashar, and Manmatha Roy

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
Let f and g be Boolean functions over a finite Abelian group 𝒢, where g is fully known and f is accessible via queries; that is, given any x ∈ 𝒢, we can obtain the value f(x). We study the problem of tolerant isomorphism testing: given parameters ε ≥ 0 and τ > 0, the goal is to determine, using as few queries as possible, whether there exists an automorphism σ of 𝒢 such that the fractional Hamming distance between f∘σ and g is at most ε, or whether for every automorphism σ, the distance is at least ε + τ. We design an efficient tolerant property testing algorithm for this problem over finite Abelian groups with constant exponent. The exponent of a finite group refers to the largest order of any element in the group. The query complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in s and 1/τ, where s bounds the spectral norm of the function g, and τ is the tolerance parameter. In addition, we present an improved algorithm in the case where g is Fourier sparse, meaning that its Fourier expansion contains only a small number of nonzero coefficients. Our approach draws on key ideas from Abelian group theory and Fourier analysis, including the annihilator of a subgroup, Pontryagin duality, and a pseudo inner product defined over finite Abelian groups. We believe that these techniques will be useful more broadly in the design of property testing algorithms.
Cite as

Swarnalipa Datta, Arijit Ghosh, Chandrima Kayal, Manaswi Paraashar, and Manmatha Roy. Testing Isomorphism of Boolean Functions over Finite Abelian Groups. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 66:1-66:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{datta_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.66,
  author =	{Datta, Swarnalipa and Ghosh, Arijit and Kayal, Chandrima and Paraashar, Manaswi and Roy, Manmatha},
  title =	{{Testing Isomorphism of Boolean Functions over Finite Abelian Groups}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{66:1--66:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.66},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244328},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.66},
  annote =	{Keywords: Analysis of Boolean functions, Abelian groups, Automorphism group, Function isomorphism, Spectral norm}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2025.11
Quantum Catalytic Space

Authors: Harry Buhrman, Marten Folkertsma, Ian Mertz, Florian Speelman, Sergii Strelchuk, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian, and Quinten Tupker

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 350, 20th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2025)

Abstract
Space complexity is a key field of study in theoretical computer science. In the quantum setting there are clear motivations to understand the power of space-restricted computation, as qubits are an especially precious and limited resource. Recently, a new branch of space-bounded complexity called catalytic computing has shown that reusing space is a very powerful computational resource, especially for subroutines that incur little to no space overhead. While quantum catalysis in an information theoretic context, and the power of "dirty" qubits for quantum computation, has been studied over the years, these models are generally not suitable for use in quantum space-bounded algorithms, as they either rely on specific catalytic states or destroy the memory being borrowed. We define the notion of catalytic computing in the quantum setting and show a number of initial results about the model. First, we show that quantum catalytic logspace can always be computed quantumly in polynomial time; the classical analogue of this is the largest open question in catalytic computing. This also allows quantum catalytic space to be defined in an equivalent way with respect to circuits instead of Turing machines. We also prove that quantum catalytic logspace can simulate log-depth threshold circuits, a class which is known to contain (and believed to strictly contain) quantum logspace, thus showcasing the power of quantum catalytic space. Finally we show that both unitary quantum catalytic logspace and classical catalytic logspace can be simulated in the one-clean qubit model.
Cite as

Harry Buhrman, Marten Folkertsma, Ian Mertz, Florian Speelman, Sergii Strelchuk, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian, and Quinten Tupker. Quantum Catalytic Space. In 20th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 350, pp. 11:1-11:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{buhrman_et_al:LIPIcs.TQC.2025.11,
  author =	{Buhrman, Harry and Folkertsma, Marten and Mertz, Ian and Speelman, Florian and Strelchuk, Sergii and Subramanian, Sathyawageeswar and Tupker, Quinten},
  title =	{{Quantum Catalytic Space}},
  booktitle =	{20th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-392-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{350},
  editor =	{Fefferman, Bill},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-240606},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum computing, quantum complexity, space-bounded algorithms, catalytic computation, one clean qubit}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.17
Space-Bounded Quantum Interactive Proof Systems

Authors: François Le Gall, Yupan Liu, Harumichi Nishimura, and Qisheng Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
We introduce two models of space-bounded quantum interactive proof systems, QIPL and QIP_{U}L. The QIP_{U}L model, a space-bounded variant of quantum interactive proofs (QIP) introduced by Watrous (CC 2003) and Kitaev and Watrous (STOC 2000), restricts verifier actions to unitary circuits. In contrast, QIPL allows logarithmically many pinching intermediate measurements per verifier action, making it the weakest model that encompasses the classical model of Condon and Ladner (JCSS 1995). We characterize the computational power of QIPL and QIP_{U}L. When the message number m is polynomially bounded, QIP_{U}L ⊊ QIPL unless P = NP: - QIPL^HC, a subclass of QIPL defined by a high-concentration condition on yes instances, exactly characterizes NP. - QIP_{U}L is contained in P and contains SAC¹ ∪ BQL, where SAC¹ denotes problems solvable by classical logarithmic-depth, semi-unbounded fan-in circuits. However, this distinction vanishes when m is constant. Our results further indicate that (pinching) intermediate measurements uniquely impact space-bounded quantum interactive proofs, unlike in space-bounded quantum computation, where BQL = BQ_{U}L. We also introduce space-bounded unitary quantum statistical zero-knowledge (QSZK_{U}L), a specific form of QIP_{U}L proof systems with statistical zero-knowledge against any verifier. This class is a space-bounded variant of quantum statistical zero-knowledge (QSZK) defined by Watrous (SICOMP 2009). We prove that QSZK_{U}L = BQL, implying that the statistical zero-knowledge property negates the computational advantage typically gained from the interaction.
Cite as

François Le Gall, Yupan Liu, Harumichi Nishimura, and Qisheng Wang. Space-Bounded Quantum Interactive Proof Systems. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 17:1-17:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{legall_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.17,
  author =	{Le Gall, Fran\c{c}ois and Liu, Yupan and Nishimura, Harumichi and Wang, Qisheng},
  title =	{{Space-Bounded Quantum Interactive Proof Systems}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237115},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Intermediate measurements, Quantum interactive proofs, Space-bounded quantum computation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.18
Directed st-Connectivity with Few Paths Is in Quantum Logspace

Authors: Simon Apers and Roman Edenhofer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
We present a BQSPACE(O(log n))-procedure to count st-paths on directed graphs for which we are promised that there are at most polynomially many paths starting in s and polynomially many paths ending in t. For comparison, the best known classical upper bound in this case just to decide st-connectivity is DSPACE(O(log² n/ log log n)). The result establishes a new relationship between BQL and unambiguity and fewness subclasses of NL. Further, we also show how to recognize directed graphs with at most polynomially many paths between any two nodes in BQSPACE(O(log n)). This yields the first natural candidate for a language separating BQL from 𝖫 and BPL. Until now, all candidates potentially separating these classes were inherently promise problems.
Cite as

Simon Apers and Roman Edenhofer. Directed st-Connectivity with Few Paths Is in Quantum Logspace. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 18:1-18:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{apers_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.18,
  author =	{Apers, Simon and Edenhofer, Roman},
  title =	{{Directed st-Connectivity with Few Paths Is in Quantum Logspace}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237128},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum computation, Space-bounded complexity classes, Graph connectivity, Unambiguous computation, Random walks}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.16
Direct Sums for Parity Decision Trees

Authors: Tyler Besselman, Mika Göös, Siyao Guo, Gilbert Maystre, and Weiqiang Yuan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Direct sum theorems state that the cost of solving k instances of a problem is at least Ω(k) times the cost of solving a single instance. We prove the first such results in the randomised parity decision tree model. We show that a direct sum theorem holds whenever (1) the lower bound for parity decision trees is proved using the discrepancy method; or (2) the lower bound is proved relative to a product distribution.
Cite as

Tyler Besselman, Mika Göös, Siyao Guo, Gilbert Maystre, and Weiqiang Yuan. Direct Sums for Parity Decision Trees. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 16:1-16:38, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{besselman_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.16,
  author =	{Besselman, Tyler and G\"{o}\"{o}s, Mika and Guo, Siyao and Maystre, Gilbert and Yuan, Weiqiang},
  title =	{{Direct Sums for Parity Decision Trees}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:38},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237105},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: direct sum, parity decision trees, query complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.12
New Lower-Bounds for Quantum Computation with Non-Collapsing Measurements

Authors: David Miloschewsky and Supartha Podder

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Aaronson, Bouland, Fitzsimons and Lee [Scott Aaronson et al., 2014] introduced the complexity class PDQP (which was original labeled naCQP), an alteration of BQP enhanced with the ability to obtain non-collapsing measurements, samples of quantum states without collapsing them. Although SZK ⊆ PDQP, it still requires Ω(N^(1/4)) queries to solve unstructured search. We formulate an alternative equivalent definition of PDQP, which we use to prove the positive weighted adversary lower-bounding method, establishing multiple tighter bounds and a trade-off between queries and non-collapsing measurements. We utilize the technique in order to analyze the query complexity of the well-studied majority and element distinctness problems. Additionally, we prove a tight Θ(N^(1/3)) bound on search. Furthermore, we use the lower-bound to explore PDQP under query restrictions, finding that when combined with non-adaptive queries, we limit the speed-up in several cases.
Cite as

David Miloschewsky and Supartha Podder. New Lower-Bounds for Quantum Computation with Non-Collapsing Measurements. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 12:1-12:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{miloschewsky_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.12,
  author =	{Miloschewsky, David and Podder, Supartha},
  title =	{{New Lower-Bounds for Quantum Computation with Non-Collapsing Measurements}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237067},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non-collapsing measurements, Quantum lower-bounds, Quantum adversary method}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.37
A Lower Bound on the Trace Norm of Boolean Matrices and Its Applications

Authors: Tsun-Ming Cheung, Hamed Hatami, Kaave Hosseini, Aleksandar Nikolov, Toniann Pitassi, and Morgan Shirley

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We present a simple method based on a variant of Hölder’s inequality to lower-bound the trace norm of Boolean matrices. As the main result, we obtain an exponential separation between the randomized decision tree depth and the spectral norm (i.e. the Fourier L₁-norm) of a Boolean function. This answers an open question of Cheung, Hatami, Hosseini and Shirley (CCC 2023). As immediate consequences, we obtain the following results. - We give an exponential separation between the logarithm of the randomized and the deterministic parity decision tree size. This is in sharp contrast with the standard binary decision tree setting where the logarithms of randomized and deterministic decision tree size are essentially polynomially related, as shown recently by Chattopadhyay, Dahiya, Mande, Radhakrishnan, and Sanyal (STOC 2023). - We give an exponential separation between the approximate and the exact spectral norm for Boolean functions. - We give an exponential separation for XOR functions between the deterministic communication complexity with oracle access to Equality function (D^EQ) and randomized communication complexity. Previously, such a separation was known for general Boolean matrices by Chattopadhyay, Lovett, and Vinyals (CCC 2019) using the Integer Inner Product (IIP) function. - Finally, our method gives an elementary and short proof for the mentioned exponential D^EQ lower bound of Chattopadhyay, Lovett, and Vinyals for Integer Inner Product (IIP).
Cite as

Tsun-Ming Cheung, Hamed Hatami, Kaave Hosseini, Aleksandar Nikolov, Toniann Pitassi, and Morgan Shirley. A Lower Bound on the Trace Norm of Boolean Matrices and Its Applications. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 37:1-37:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cheung_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.37,
  author =	{Cheung, Tsun-Ming and Hatami, Hamed and Hosseini, Kaave and Nikolov, Aleksandar and Pitassi, Toniann and Shirley, Morgan},
  title =	{{A Lower Bound on the Trace Norm of Boolean Matrices and Its Applications}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226654},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: Boolean function complexity, parity decision trees, randomized communication complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.31
Quantum Advantage and Lower Bounds in Parallel Query Complexity

Authors: Joseph Carolan, Amin Shiraz Gilani, and Mahathi Vempati

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
It is well known that quantum, randomized and deterministic (sequential) query complexities are polynomially related for total boolean functions. We find that significantly larger separations between the parallel generalizations of these measures are possible. In particular, 1) We employ the cheatsheet framework to obtain an unbounded parallel quantum query advantage over its randomized analogue for a total function, falsifying a conjecture of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.6116]. 2) We strengthen 1 by constructing a total function which exhibits an unbounded parallel quantum query advantage despite having no sequential advantage, suggesting that genuine quantum advantage could occur entirely due to parallelism. 3) We construct a total function that exhibits a polynomial separation between 2-round quantum and randomized query complexities, contrasting a result of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0018] that there is at most a constant separation for 1-round (nonadaptive) algorithms. 4) We develop a new technique for deriving parallel quantum lower bounds from sequential upper bounds. We employ this technique to give lower bounds for Boolean symmetric functions and read-once formulas, ruling out large parallel query advantages for them. We also provide separations between randomized and deterministic parallel query complexities analogous to items 1-3.
Cite as

Joseph Carolan, Amin Shiraz Gilani, and Mahathi Vempati. Quantum Advantage and Lower Bounds in Parallel Query Complexity. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 31:1-31:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carolan_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.31,
  author =	{Carolan, Joseph and Gilani, Amin Shiraz and Vempati, Mahathi},
  title =	{{Quantum Advantage and Lower Bounds in Parallel Query Complexity}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226597},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational complexity theory, quantum, lower bounds, parallel}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.25
Trade-Offs Between Entanglement and Communication

Authors: Srinivasan Arunachalam and Uma Girish

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 264, 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)

Abstract
We study the advantages of quantum communication models over classical communication models that are equipped with a limited number of qubits of entanglement. In this direction, we give explicit partial functions on n bits for which reducing the entanglement increases the classical communication complexity exponentially. Our separations are as follows. For every k ≥ ~1: Q‖^* versus R2^*: We show that quantum simultaneous protocols with Θ̃(k⁵log³n) qubits of entanglement can exponentially outperform two-way randomized protocols with O(k) qubits of entanglement. This resolves an open problem from [Dmitry Gavinsky, 2008] and improves the state-of-the-art separations between quantum simultaneous protocols with entanglement and two-way randomized protocols without entanglement [Gavinsky, 2019; Girish et al., 2022]. R‖^* versus Q‖^*: We show that classical simultaneous protocols with Θ̃(k log n) qubits of entanglement can exponentially outperform quantum simultaneous protocols with O(k) qubits of entanglement, resolving an open question from [Gavinsky et al., 2006; Gavinsky, 2019]. The best result prior to our work was a relational separation against protocols without entanglement [Gavinsky et al., 2006]. R‖^* versus R1^*: We show that classical simultaneous protocols with Θ̃(k log n) qubits of entanglement can exponentially outperform randomized one-way protocols with O(k) qubits of entanglement. Prior to our work, only a relational separation was known [Dmitry Gavinsky, 2008].
Cite as

Srinivasan Arunachalam and Uma Girish. Trade-Offs Between Entanglement and Communication. In 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 264, pp. 25:1-25:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arunachalam_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2023.25,
  author =	{Arunachalam, Srinivasan and Girish, Uma},
  title =	{{Trade-Offs Between Entanglement and Communication}},
  booktitle =	{38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-282-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{264},
  editor =	{Ta-Shma, Amnon},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-182957},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum, communication complexity, exponential separation, boolean hidden matching, forrelation, xor lemma}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.56
Is Untrusted Randomness Helpful?

Authors: Uma Girish, Ran Raz, and Wei Zhan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 251, 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)

Abstract
Randomized algorithms and protocols assume the availability of a perfect source of randomness. In real life, however, perfect randomness is rare and is almost never guaranteed. The gap between these two facts motivated much of the work on randomness and derandomization in theoretical computer science. In this work, we define a new type of randomized algorithms (and protocols), that we call robustly-randomized algorithms (protocols). Such algorithms have access to two separate (read-once) random strings. The first string is trusted to be perfectly random, but its length is bounded by some parameter k = k(n) (where n is the length of the input). We think of k as relatively small, say sub-linear or poly-logarithmic in n. The second string is of unbounded length and is assumed to be random, but its randomness is not trusted. The output of the algorithm is either an output in the set of possible outputs of the problem, or a special symbol, interpreted as do not know and denoted by ⊥. On every input for the algorithm, the output of the algorithm must satisfy the following two requirements: 1) If the second random string is perfectly random then the algorithm must output the correct answer with high probability. 2) If the second random string is an arbitrary string, even adversarially chosen after seeing the input, the algorithm must output with high probability either the correct answer or the special symbol ⊥. We discuss relations of this new definition to several previously studied notions in randomness and derandomization. For example, when considering polynomial-time algorithms, if k is logarithmic we get the complexity class ZPP, while if k is unbounded we get the complexity class BPP, and for a general k, the algorithm can be viewed as an interactive proof with a probabilistic polynomial-time prover and a probabilistic polynomial-time verifier, where the prover is allowed an unlimited number of random bits and the verifier is limited to at most k random bits. Every previously-studied class of randomized algorithms or protocols, and more generally, every previous use of randomness in theoretical computer science, can be revisited and redefined in light of our new definition, by replacing each random string with a pair of random strings, the first is trusted to be perfectly random but is relatively short and the second is of unlimited length but its randomness is not trusted. The main question that we ask is: In which settings and for which problems is the untrusted random string helpful? Our main technical observation is that every problem in the class BPL (of problems solvable by bounded-error randomized logspace algorithms) can be solved by a robustly-randomized logspace algorithm with k = O(log n), that is with just a logarithmic number of trusted random bits. We also give query complexity separations that show cases where the untrusted random string is provenly helpful. Specifically, we show that there are promise problems that can be solved by robustly-randomized protocols with only one query and just a logarithmic number of trusted random bits, whereas any randomized protocol requires either a linear number of random bits or an exponential number of queries, and any zero-error randomized protocol requires a polynomial number of queries.
Cite as

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, and Wei Zhan. Is Untrusted Randomness Helpful?. In 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 251, pp. 56:1-56:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{girish_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.56,
  author =	{Girish, Uma and Raz, Ran and Zhan, Wei},
  title =	{{Is Untrusted Randomness Helpful?}},
  booktitle =	{14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)},
  pages =	{56:1--56:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-263-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{251},
  editor =	{Tauman Kalai, Yael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.56},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-175593},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.56},
  annote =	{Keywords: Untrusted, Randomness, Verifiable, ZPL, BPL, ZPP, BPP}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.6
Polynomial Bounds on Parallel Repetition for All 3-Player Games with Binary Inputs

Authors: Uma Girish, Kunal Mittal, Ran Raz, and Wei Zhan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 245, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2022)

Abstract
We prove that for every 3-player (3-prover) game G with value less than one, whose query distribution has the support S = {(1,0,0), (0,1,0), (0,0,1)} of Hamming weight one vectors, the value of the n-fold parallel repetition G^{⊗n} decays polynomially fast to zero; that is, there is a constant c = c(G) > 0 such that the value of the game G^{⊗n} is at most n^{-c}. Following the recent work of Girish, Holmgren, Mittal, Raz and Zhan (STOC 2022), our result is the missing piece that implies a similar bound for a much more general class of multiplayer games: For every 3-player game G over binary questions and arbitrary answer lengths, with value less than 1, there is a constant c = c(G) > 0 such that the value of the game G^{⊗n} is at most n^{-c}. Our proof technique is new and requires many new ideas. For example, we make use of the Level-k inequalities from Boolean Fourier Analysis, which, to the best of our knowledge, have not been explored in this context prior to our work.
Cite as

Uma Girish, Kunal Mittal, Ran Raz, and Wei Zhan. Polynomial Bounds on Parallel Repetition for All 3-Player Games with Binary Inputs. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 245, pp. 6:1-6:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{girish_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.6,
  author =	{Girish, Uma and Mittal, Kunal and Raz, Ran and Zhan, Wei},
  title =	{{Polynomial Bounds on Parallel Repetition for All 3-Player Games with Binary Inputs}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2022)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-249-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{245},
  editor =	{Chakrabarti, Amit and Swamy, Chaitanya},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-171286},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parallel repetition, Multi-prover games, Fourier analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2022.60
Analyzing XOR-Forrelation Through Stochastic Calculus

Authors: Xinyu Wu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 219, 39th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2022)

Abstract
In this note we present a simplified analysis of the quantum and classical complexity of the k-XOR Forrelation problem (introduced in the paper of Girish, Raz and Zhan [Uma Girish et al., 2020]) by a stochastic interpretation of the Forrelation distribution.
Cite as

Xinyu Wu. Analyzing XOR-Forrelation Through Stochastic Calculus. In 39th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 219, pp. 60:1-60:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{wu:LIPIcs.STACS.2022.60,
  author =	{Wu, Xinyu},
  title =	{{Analyzing XOR-Forrelation Through Stochastic Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2022)},
  pages =	{60:1--60:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-222-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{219},
  editor =	{Berenbrink, Petra and Monmege, Benjamin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2022.60},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-158705},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2022.60},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum complexity, Brownian motion}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 21 Document/PDF
  • 11 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 8 2025
  • 2 2023
  • 3 2022
  • 5 2021

  • Refine by Author
  • 10 Girish, Uma
  • 7 Raz, Ran
  • 6 Zhan, Wei
  • 2 Mittal, Kunal
  • 2 Subramanian, Sathyawageeswar
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 21 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 10 Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory
  • 5 Theory of computation → Communication complexity
  • 5 Theory of computation → Oracles and decision trees
  • 4 Theory of computation → Complexity classes
  • 4 Theory of computation → Pseudorandomness and derandomization
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Forrelation
  • 3 query complexity
  • 2 parity decision trees
  • 2 quantum
  • 2 quantum complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact