45 Search Results for "Krötzsch, Markus"

Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.4.1.4
Native Provenance Computation for Federated and Non-Federated SPARQL Queries

Authors: Zubaria Asma, Daniel Hernández, Luis Galárraga, Giorgos Flouris, Irini Fundulaki, and Katja Hose

Published in: TGDK, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2026). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 4, Issue 1

Abstract
The popularity of knowledge graphs (KGs) owes credit to their flexible data model, which is suitable for data integration from multiple sources. Several KG-based applications, such as trust assessment, view maintenance, or data valuation on dynamic data, rely on the ability to compute provenance explanations for query results. This need becomes more urgent in federated query processing systems, which allow the online consumption of heterogeneous and decentralized Web data. However, the problem of computing and interacting with provenance has received little attention, especially in the federated setting. On those grounds, this paper introduces the NPCS (Native Provenance Computation for SPARQL) approach, and its federated variant Fed-NPCS, that compute provenance for SPARQL query results. Both approaches build upon spm-semirings to annotate the results of monotonic and non-monotonic SPARQL queries with their provenance. Due to their reliance on query rewriting techniques, the approaches are directly applicable to already deployed SPARQL engines and federations using different reification schemes, including RDF-star. Our experimental evaluation shows that our novel query rewriting approach brings significant run-time improvements w.r.t. the state-of-the-art across both centralized and federated settings. In centralized settings, our tests on two popular SPARQL engines (GraphDB and Stardog) reveal substantial runtime gains over existing query rewriting solutions, enabling scalability to RDF graphs with billions of triples. In federated settings, our experiments on the FedShop benchmark with GraphDB show the viability of Fed-NPCS for federations with up to 200 sources.
Cite as

Zubaria Asma, Daniel Hernández, Luis Galárraga, Giorgos Flouris, Irini Fundulaki, and Katja Hose. Native Provenance Computation for Federated and Non-Federated SPARQL Queries. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 4:1-4:43, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{asma_et_al:TGDK.4.1.4,
  author =	{Asma, Zubaria and Hern\'{a}ndez, Daniel and Gal\'{a}rraga, Luis and Flouris, Giorgos and Fundulaki, Irini and Hose, Katja},
  title =	{{Native Provenance Computation for Federated and Non-Federated SPARQL Queries}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{4:1--4:43},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{4},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.4.1.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259642},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.4.1.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: native provenance computation, federated SPARQL queries, data provenance, NPCS, Fed-NPCS}
}
Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.4.1.3
Semantically Reflected Programs

Authors: Eduard Kamburjan, Vidar Norstein Klungre, Yuanwei Qu, Rudolf Schlatte, Egor V. Kostylev, Martin Giese, and Einar Broch Johnsen

Published in: TGDK, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2026). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 4, Issue 1

Abstract
This paper addresses the dichotomy between the formalization of structural and the formalization of executable behavioral knowledge by means of semantically lifted programs, which explore an intuitive connection between imperative programs and knowledge graphs. While knowledge graphs and ontologies are eminently useful to represent formal knowledge about a system’s individuals and universals, programming languages are designed to describe the system’s evolution. To address this dichotomy, we introduce a semantic lifting of the program states of an executing progam into a knowledge graph, for an object-oriented programming language. The resulting graph is exposed as a semantic reflection layer within the programming language, allowing programmers to leverage knowledge of the application domain in their programs during execution. In this paper, we formalize semantic lifting and semantic reflection for a small imperative programming language, SMOL, explain the operational aspects of the language, and consider type correctness and virtualization for runtime program queries through the semantic reflection layer. We illustrate semantic lifting and semantic reflection through a case study of geological modeling and discuss different applications of the technique. The language implementation is open source and available online.
Cite as

Eduard Kamburjan, Vidar Norstein Klungre, Yuanwei Qu, Rudolf Schlatte, Egor V. Kostylev, Martin Giese, and Einar Broch Johnsen. Semantically Reflected Programs. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 3:1-3:52, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{kamburjan_et_al:TGDK.4.1.3,
  author =	{Kamburjan, Eduard and Klungre, Vidar Norstein and Qu, Yuanwei and Schlatte, Rudolf and Kostylev, Egor V. and Giese, Martin and Johnsen, Einar Broch},
  title =	{{Semantically Reflected Programs}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{3:1--3:52},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{4},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.4.1.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256884},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.4.1.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Graphs, Ontologies, Object-Oriented Modelling, Imperative Programming Languages, Reflection, Type Safety}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.1
Query Decompositions and All That (Invited Talk)

Authors: Kyle Deeds, Timo Camillo Merkl, Reinhard Pichler, and Dan Suciu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 365, 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)

Abstract
The close relationship between Conjunctive Queries (CQs) and Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) has long been known. Nevertheless, apart from decomposition methods, research on efficient query evaluation or constraint solving algorithms has developed rather independently. In this article, we illustrate how search algorithms originating from the CSP community can be fruitfully applied to query evaluation - either by further developing the original search algorithms or by combining them with query decomposition methods. It turns out that the resulting approaches may indeed lead to lower time and/or space complexity than previous query evaluation methods.
Cite as

Kyle Deeds, Timo Camillo Merkl, Reinhard Pichler, and Dan Suciu. Query Decompositions and All That (Invited Talk). In 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 365, pp. 1:1-1:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deeds_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.1,
  author =	{Deeds, Kyle and Merkl, Timo Camillo and Pichler, Reinhard and Suciu, Dan},
  title =	{{Query Decompositions and All That}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-413-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{365},
  editor =	{ten Cate, Balder and Funk, Maurice},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256158},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Query evaluation, Query decompositions, Complexity}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.3
Building Relational Circuits (Invited Talk)

Authors: Florent Capelli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 365, 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)

Abstract
We review two algorithms which allow to build a factorized representation of the answers set of join queries. In a nutshell, the representation builds a circuit representing the answers set of a join query by starting from atomic relations and iteratively combine them by either constructing the Cartesian product or the disjoint union of previously computed relations. The first one can be seen as the trace of the celebrated Yannakakis algorithm, building the answer set from the inputs to the output of the circuit while the second adopts a top-down approach which can be seen as a generalization of the exhaustive DPLL algorithm, originally designed to solve the #SAT problem.
Cite as

Florent Capelli. Building Relational Circuits (Invited Talk). In 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 365, pp. 3:1-3:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{capelli:LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.3,
  author =	{Capelli, Florent},
  title =	{{Building Relational Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-413-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{365},
  editor =	{ten Cate, Balder and Funk, Maurice},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256172},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Conjunctive queries, factorized databases, knowledge compilation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.5
Rule Rewriting Revisited: A Fresh Look at Static Filtering for Datalog and ASP

Authors: Philipp Hanisch and Markus Krötzsch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 365, 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)

Abstract
Static filtering is a data-independent optimisation method for Datalog, which generalises algebraic query rewriting techniques from relational databases. In spite of its early discovery by Kifer and Lozinskii in 1986, the method has been overlooked in recent research and system development, and special cases are being rediscovered independently. We therefore recall the original approach, using updated terminology and more general filter predicates that capture features of modern systems, and we show how to extend its applicability to answer set programming (ASP). The outcome is strictly more general but also more complex than the classical approach: double exponential in general and single exponential even for predicates of bounded arity. As a solution, we propose tractable approximations of the algorithm that can still yield much improved logic programs in typical cases, e.g., it can improve the performance of rule systems over real-world data in the order of magnitude.
Cite as

Philipp Hanisch and Markus Krötzsch. Rule Rewriting Revisited: A Fresh Look at Static Filtering for Datalog and ASP. In 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 365, pp. 5:1-5:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hanisch_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.5,
  author =	{Hanisch, Philipp and Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
  title =	{{Rule Rewriting Revisited: A Fresh Look at Static Filtering for Datalog and ASP}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-413-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{365},
  editor =	{ten Cate, Balder and Funk, Maurice},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256197},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Rule rewriting, static optimisation, static filtering, Datalog, Answer Set Programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.12
The Complexity of Finding Missing Answer Repairs

Authors: Jesse Comer and Val Tannen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 365, 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)

Abstract
We investigate the problem of identifying database repairs for missing tuples in query answers. We show that when the query is part of the input - the combined complexity setting - determining whether or not a repair exists is polynomial-time equivalent to the satisfiability problem for classes of queries admitting a weak form of projection and selection. We then identify the sub-classes of unions of conjunctive queries with negated atoms, defined by the relational algebra operations permitted to appear in the query, for which the minimal repair problem can be solved in polynomial time. In contrast, we show that the problem is NP-hard, as well as set cover-hard to approximate via strict reductions, whenever both projection and join are permitted in the input query. Additionally, we show that finding the size of a minimal repair for unions of conjunctive queries (with negated atoms permitted) is OptP[log(n)]-complete, while computing a minimal repair is possible with O(n²) queries to an NP oracle. With recursion permitted, the combined complexity of all of these variants increases significantly, with an EXP lower bound. However, from the data complexity perspective, we show that minimal repairs can be identified in polynomial time for all queries expressible as semi-positive datalog programs.
Cite as

Jesse Comer and Val Tannen. The Complexity of Finding Missing Answer Repairs. In 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 365, pp. 12:1-12:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{comer_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.12,
  author =	{Comer, Jesse and Tannen, Val},
  title =	{{The Complexity of Finding Missing Answer Repairs}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-413-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{365},
  editor =	{ten Cate, Balder and Funk, Maurice},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256265},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Missing answers, database repairs, datalog, computational complexity}
}
Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1
A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations

Authors: Shqiponja Ahmetaj, Robert David, Axel Polleres, and Mantas Šimkus

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 3 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 3

Abstract
The Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) is a recent standard, a W3C recommendation, for validating RDF graphs against shape constraints to be checked on target nodes of a data graph. The standard also describes the notion of validation reports, which detail the results of the validation process. In case of violation of constraints, the validation report should explain the reasons for non-validation, offering guidance on how to identify or fix violations in the data graph. Since the specification left it open to SHACL processors to define such explanations, a recent work proposed the use of explanations in the style of database repairs, where a repair is a set of additions to or deletions from the data graph so that the resulting graph validates against the constraints. In this paper, we study such repairs for non-recursive SHACL, the largest fragment of SHACL that is fully defined in the specification. We propose an algorithm to compute repairs by encoding the explanation problem - using Answer Set Programming (ASP) - into a logic program, where the answer sets contain (minimal) repairs. We then study a scenario where it is not possible to simultaneously repair all the targets, which may be the case due to overall unsatisfiability or conflicting constraints. We introduce a relaxed notion of validation, which allows to validate a (maximal) subset of the targets and adapt the ASP translation to take into account this relaxation. Finally, we add support for repairing constraints which use property paths and equality of paths. Our implementation in clingo is - to the best of our knowledge - the first implementation of a repair program for SHACL.
Cite as

Shqiponja Ahmetaj, Robert David, Axel Polleres, and Mantas Šimkus. A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 1:1-1:36, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{ahmetaj_et_al:TGDK.3.3.1,
  author =	{Ahmetaj, Shqiponja and David, Robert and Polleres, Axel and \v{S}imkus, Mantas},
  title =	{{A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{1:1--1:36},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252124},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: SHACL, Shapes Constraint Language, Database Repairs, Knowledge Graphs, Semantic Web, Answer Set Programming}
}
Document
Use Case
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.3.5
LLM-Supported Manufacturing Mapping Generation

Authors: Wilma Johanna Schmidt, Irlan Grangel-González, Adrian Paschke, and Evgeny Kharlamov

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 3 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 3

Abstract
In large manufacturing companies, such as Bosch, that operate thousands of production lines with each comprising up to dozens of production machines and other equipment, even simple inventory questions such as of location and quantities of a particular equipment type require non-trivial solutions. Addressing these questions requires to integrate multiple heterogeneous data sets which is time consuming and error prone and demands domain as well as knowledge experts. Knowledge graphs (KGs) are practical for consolidating inventory data by bringing it into the same format and linking inventory items. However, the KG creation and maintenance itself pose challenges as mappings are needed to connect data sets and ontologies. In this work, we address these challenges by exploring LLM-supported and context-enhanced generation of both YARRRML and RML mappings. Facing large ontologies in the manufacturing domain and token limitations in LLM prompts, we further evaluate ontology reduction methods in our approach. We evaluate our approach both quantitatively against reference mappings created manually by experts and, for YARRRML, also qualitatively with expert feedback. This work extends the exploration of the challenges with LLM-supported and context-enhanced mapping generation YARRRML [Schmidt et al., 2025] by comprehensive analyses on RML mappings and an ontology reduction evaluation. We further publish the source code of this work. Our work provides a valuable support when creating manufacturing mappings and supports data and schema updates.
Cite as

Wilma Johanna Schmidt, Irlan Grangel-González, Adrian Paschke, and Evgeny Kharlamov. LLM-Supported Manufacturing Mapping Generation. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 5:1-5:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{schmidt_et_al:TGDK.3.3.5,
  author =	{Schmidt, Wilma Johanna and Grangel-Gonz\'{a}lez, Irlan and Paschke, Adrian and Kharlamov, Evgeny},
  title =	{{LLM-Supported Manufacturing Mapping Generation}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{5:1--5:22},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.3.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252164},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.3.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mapping Generation, Knowledge Graph Construction, Ontology Reduction, RML, YARRRML, LLM, Manufacturing}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6
Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies (Invited Paper)

Authors: Patrick Koopmann

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
The Web Ontology Language (OWL), grounded in description logics, enables reasoning systems to infer implicit knowledge in a transparent manner. However, the expressivity of description logics and the complexity of large ontologies often results in reasoning outcomes that are hard to understand without additional tool support. Explanations of these outcomes are essential for users to understand ontology content, communicate its structure and behavior effectively, and debug undesired or missing inferences. This chapter provides an overview of the central explanation techniques that have been developed for explaining reasoning with description logic ontologies. Here, we consider both explanations for positive entailments (explaining why something can be deduced), as well as negative entailments (why something cannot be deduced). More specifically, we discuss justifications, proofs and interpolation as a means to explain positive entailments, and abduction for explaining negative entailments, where we also have a closer look at practical algorithms as well as practical and theoretical challenges.
Cite as

Patrick Koopmann. Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 6:1-6:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koopmann:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6,
  author =	{Koopmann, Patrick},
  title =	{{Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:29},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250514},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Explanations, Justifications, Proofs, Craig Interpolation, Contrastive Explanations}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.1
Rule-Based Knowledge Graph Completion (Invited Paper)

Authors: Patrick Betz, Christian Meilicke, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
The field of knowledge graph completion is concerned with augmenting knowledge graphs with missing information. Symbolic rule-based approaches are not only efficient and interpretable but also competitive with embedding-based methods in regard to predictive quality. Rule-based knowledge graph completion can be separated into two stages, the learning stage and the application stage, which are both individually challenging. In the learning stage, horn rules are mined from a given knowledge graph. Given the vast size of the space of all possible rules, the mining approach must select relevant rules effectively. In the application stage, the mined rules are used to make new predictions which are assigned with plausibility scores. These scores need to be set by aggregating individual confidence values of rules that have the same consequence. This tutorial covers the fundamental aspects required to build a symbolic rule-based approach for knowledge graph completion. It will discuss the different rule types, mining strategies, and how to effectively apply the rules in different scenarios. Finally, we discuss practical examples for rule application by using the Python-based PyClause library.
Cite as

Patrick Betz, Christian Meilicke, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Rule-Based Knowledge Graph Completion (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 1:1-1:45, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{betz_et_al:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.1,
  author =	{Betz, Patrick and Meilicke, Christian and Stuckenschmidt, Heiner},
  title =	{{Rule-Based Knowledge Graph Completion}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:45},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250461},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Graph Completion, Rule Learning, Symbolic AI}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9
Reasoning About Time in DatalogMTL: Course Notes (Invited Paper)

Authors: Przemysław Andrzej Wałęga

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
Many real-world applications, such as those in healthcare, finance, and logistics, require reasoning over temporal data. Standard rule-based languages like Datalog, however, lack explicit mechanisms for handling time and temporal dependencies. In this chapter, we discussDatalogMTL, an extension of Datalog with operators frommetric temporal logic that allow to express complex temporal properties. We focus on reasoning algorithms for DatalogMTL, discussing bothmaterialisation, based on fixpoint applications of the immediate consequence operator, and anovel saturation-based extensionthat detects and halts infinite derivations, ensuring both completeness and termination of reasoning.
Cite as

Przemysław Andrzej Wałęga. Reasoning About Time in DatalogMTL: Course Notes (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 9:1-9:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{walega:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9,
  author =	{Wa{\l}\k{e}ga, Przemys{\l}aw Andrzej},
  title =	{{Reasoning About Time in DatalogMTL: Course Notes}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:23},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250546},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: DatalogMTL, Logic Programming, Temporal Reasoning}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7
Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper)

Authors: Markus Krötzsch

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
Pure Datalog is arguably the most fundamental rule language, elegant and simple, but also often too limited to be useful in practice. This has motivated the introduction of many new expressive features, ranging from datatypes and related functions, over aggregates and semi-ring generalisations, to existential quantifiers and complex terms. In spite of their variety, all these approaches remain true to the nature of Datalog as a direct, pattern-based way of computing on structured data. We therefore find that a modern notion of Datalog is emerging, distinctly different from other approaches of logic programming and with its own set of related methods and applications. In this course, we introduce Datalog and its most common extensions, and explain when and how these features can be used together (which is often, but not always, safe to do). We further look at modern Datalog systems and some of their primary use cases. Hands-on work with Datalog and its extensions is done with the free Datalog engine https://knowsys.github.io/nemo-doc/. The course is accessible to all audiences and does not assume specific prior knowledge.
Cite as

Markus Krötzsch. Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 7:1-7:41, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{krotzsch:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7,
  author =	{Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
  title =	{{Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:41},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250524},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Datalog, query language, knowlegde representation and reasoning, logic programming, Horn logic, SPARQL, datatypes and aggregation, lecture notes, tutorial}
}
Artifact
Software
DOI: 10.4230/artifacts.25064
Nemo

Authors: Markus Krötzsch, Alex Ivliev, Maximilian Marx, Lukas Gerlach, and Various Nemo contributors

Abstract
Cite as

Markus Krötzsch, Alex Ivliev, Maximilian Marx, Lukas Gerlach, Various Nemo contributors. Nemo (Software, Source Code, reasoner). Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@misc{dagstuhl-artifact-25064,
   title = {{Nemo}}, 
   author = {Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus and Ivliev, Alex and Marx, Maximilian and Gerlach, Lukas and Nemo contributors, Various},
   note = {Software, version v0.9.1., swhId: \href{https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:eb91e855fdf64b2a673f3233d608e36d828fd108;origin=https://github.com/knowsys/nemo;visit=swh:1:snp:35468796e5e3b62b9d9267b6ee6a016ecd66e645;anchor=swh:1:rev:c2190b996549656786a8728ea4bd39a68b5becce}{\texttt{swh:1:dir:eb91e855fdf64b2a673f3233d608e36d828fd108}} (visited on 2025-11-28)},
   url = {https://github.com/knowsys/nemo},
   doi = {10.4230/artifacts.25064},
}
Artifact
Software
DOI: 10.4230/artifacts.23826
knowsys/CertifyingDatalog

Authors: Johannes Tantow, Lukas Gerlach, Stephan Mennicke, and Markus Krötzsch

Abstract
Cite as

Johannes Tantow, Lukas Gerlach, Stephan Mennicke, Markus Krötzsch. knowsys/CertifyingDatalog (Software, Lean Formalization). Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@misc{dagstuhl-artifact-23826,
   title = {{knowsys/CertifyingDatalog}}, 
   author = {Tantow, Johannes and Gerlach, Lukas and Mennicke, Stephan and Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
   note = {Software, version 0.2.0., swhId: \href{https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:57aca8aba4c9f62a87ba52360ad701b8e9cf7b45;origin=https://github.com/knowsys/CertifyingDatalog;visit=swh:1:snp:617e84a1a49818c83a6a7c32cda6267fc6f09596;anchor=swh:1:rev:7adf4abd7826dd529491551f192c5815d430313a}{\texttt{swh:1:dir:57aca8aba4c9f62a87ba52360ad701b8e9cf7b45}} (visited on 2025-09-22)},
   url = {https://github.com/knowsys/CertifyingDatalog/tree/v0.2.0},
   doi = {10.4230/artifacts.23826},
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36
Verifying Datalog Reasoning with Lean

Authors: Johannes Tantow, Lukas Gerlach, Stephan Mennicke, and Markus Krötzsch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Datalog is an essential logical rule language with many applications, and modern rule engines compute logical consequences for Datalog with high performance and scalability. While Datalog is rather simple and, in principle, explainable by design, such sophisticated implementations and optimizations are hard to verify. We therefore propose a certificate-based approach to validate results of Datalog reasoners in a formally verified checker for Datalog proofs. Using the proof assistant Lean, we implement such a checker and verify its correctness against direct formalizations of the Datalog semantics. We propose two JSON encodings for Datalog proofs: one using the widely supported Datalog proof trees, and one using directed acyclic graphs for succinctness. To evaluate the practical feasibility and performance of our approach, we validate proofs that we obtain by converting derivation traces of an existing Datalog reasoner into our tool-independent format.
Cite as

Johannes Tantow, Lukas Gerlach, Stephan Mennicke, and Markus Krötzsch. Verifying Datalog Reasoning with Lean. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 36:1-36:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{tantow_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36,
  author =	{Tantow, Johannes and Gerlach, Lukas and Mennicke, Stephan and Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
  title =	{{Verifying Datalog Reasoning with Lean}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246342},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Certifying Algorithms, Datalog, Formal Verification}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 43 Document/PDF
  • 34 Document/HTML
  • 2 Artifact

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 6 2026
  • 16 2025
  • 10 2024
  • 8 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 10 Krötzsch, Markus
  • 4 Marx, Maximilian
  • 3 Gerlach, Lukas
  • 3 Hose, Katja
  • 3 Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs
  • 6 OASIcs
  • 24 TGDK
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 9 Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • 5 Information systems → Graph-based database models
  • 5 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 5 Theory of computation → Logic and databases
  • 3 Applied computing → Life and medical sciences
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 7 Knowledge Graphs
  • 5 Datalog
  • 3 Knowledge graphs
  • 3 OWL
  • 3 SPARQL
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact