6 Search Results for "Okada, Mitsuhiro"

Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4
Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics (Invited Talk)

Authors: Pierre Clairambault

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Quantitative semantics are those denotational semantics that inherit from linear logic [Jean-Yves Girard, 1987] a sensitivity to the multiplicity of resources involved in computation. Those include the relational model [Jean-Yves Girard, 1987] and its numerous variations (such as finiteness spaces [Thomas Ehrhard, 2005], weighted relational models [Jim Laird et al., 2013] and their extensions [Thomas Ehrhard et al., 2011; Thomas Ehrhard, 2002], generalized species of structure [Fiore et al., 2008], span models [Paul-André Melliès, 2019; Pierre Clairambault and Simon Forest, 2023], etc), as well as related syntactic methods such as non-idempotent intersection types [Daniel de Carvalho, 2018] and Taylor expansion of lambda-terms [Thomas Ehrhard and Laurent Regnier, 2003]. Interactive semantics are usually also quantitative, but in addition they present the interactive behaviour of proofs and programs, generally organized chronologically - those include the many variants of game semantics (starting with [J. M. E. Hyland and C.-H. Luke Ong, 2000; Samson Abramsky et al., 2000]), and other frameworks such as Geometry of Interaction [Girard, 1989] or ludics [Jean-Yves Girard, 2001]. Both families are cornerstones of modern denotational semantics, and both have associated Alonzo Church awards: game semantics in 2017, and quantitative semantics (in particular, differential linear logic and the differential λ-calculus) in 2024. It has more or less always been clear to the experts that the two, sharing an origin in linear logic, are conceptually related. Yet there are differences, which seem fundamental: in particular, while quantitative models compose relationally, the composition of strategies follows an intricate "parallel interaction plus hiding" process inspired from concurrency theory [Abramsky, 1997]. The two families of models have also historically targeted different kinds of languages: whereas quantitative semantics focused on theoretical calculi (and the λ-calculus in particular), game semantics is known for fully abstract models for languages with elaborate combinations of effects including local state [Samson Abramsky and Guy McCusker, 1996], control operators [James Laird, 1997], and concurrent primitives [Dan R. Ghica and Andrzej S. Murawski, 2008]. Early on, researchers have explored the relationship between the two [Thomas Ehrhard, 1996; Patrick Baillot et al., 1997], and investigations on this question have spanned decades [Pierre Boudes, 2009; Ana C. Calderon and Guy McCusker, 2010; Takeshi Tsukada and C.-H. Luke Ong, 2016; C.-H. Luke Ong, 2017]. In particular, Melliès' work on asynchronous games [Paul-André Melliès, 2006; Paul-André Melliès, 2005] made significant conceptual contributions, showing that the issue was enlightened by adopting a positional formulation of game semantics, where points in the relational model simply arise as certain positions. This talk surveys recent developments in this line of work, shedding light on the connection between those two families. Our work is set in so-called "thin concurrent games" [Simon Castellan et al., 2019; Pierre Clairambault, 2024], an extension with symmetry of Rideau and Winskel’s concurrent games on event structures [Silvain Rideau and Glynn Winskel, 2011]. Event structures being one of the main "truly concurrent" models of concurrency [Glynn Winskel, 1986], it is perhaps expected that thin concurrent games can model concurrent languages: they provide a truly concurrent refinement of Ghica and Murawski’s fully abstract model of Idealized Concurrent Algol [Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault, 2024; Pierre Clairambault, 2024]. But beyond the semantics of concurrency, thin concurrent games are also a deep reworking on game semantics built from causal principles, inheriting from asynchronous games a positional flavour. In thin concurrent games, strategies have a dual nature: an event-based nature where they appear as certain event structures composed via parallel interaction plus hiding; or a positional nature where they appear as certain spans of groupoids, composed by pullback (modulo a technical condition on strategies called visibility) - they can be regarded both as a games and a relational model! Leveraging this dual nature, in a sequence of papers with Castellan, de Visme, Olimpieri and Paquet, we have been able to link the single framework of thin concurrent games with numerous other models. This includes various traditional alternating or non-alternating games models [Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault, 2024; Pierre Clairambault, 2024], the weighted relational model [Pierre Clairambault and Hugo Paquet, 2021], the quantum relational model [Pierre Clairambault and Marc de Visme, 2020], generalized species of structure [Pierre Clairambault et al., 2023], and - going beyond quantitative semantics - the linear Scott model [Clairambault, 2025], a linear decomposition of standard Scott domain semantics [Thomas Ehrhard, 2012]. All these distinct models are obtained by projecting away certain aspects of thin concurrent games, giving some support to the claim that thin concurrent games are a Rosetta stone for interactive and quantitative semantics.
Cite as

Pierre Clairambault. Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics (Invited Talk). In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 4:1-4:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{clairambault:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4,
  author =	{Clairambault, Pierre},
  title =	{{Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254286},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Denotational semantics, Game semantics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10
An Isabelle/HOL Formalization of Semi-Thue and Conditional Semi-Thue Systems

Authors: Dohan Kim

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We present a formalized framework for semi-Thue and conditional semi-Thue systems for studying monoids and their word problem using the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant. We provide a formalized decision procedure for the word problem of monoids if they are finitely presented by complete semi-Thue systems. In particular, we present a new formalized method for checking confluence using (conditional) critical pairs for certain conditional semi-Thue systems. We propose and formalize an inference system for generating conditional equational theories and Thue congruences using conditional semi-Thue systems. Then we provide a new formalized decision procedure for the word problem of monoids which have finite complete (reductive) conditional presentations.
Cite as

Dohan Kim. An Isabelle/HOL Formalization of Semi-Thue and Conditional Semi-Thue Systems. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 10:1-10:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kim:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10,
  author =	{Kim, Dohan},
  title =	{{An Isabelle/HOL Formalization of Semi-Thue and Conditional Semi-Thue Systems}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246081},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: semi-Thue systems, conditional semi-Thue systems, conditional string rewriting, monoids, word problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.55
Model-Theoretic Forcing in Transition Algebra

Authors: Go Hashimoto and Daniel Găină

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 345, 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)

Abstract
We study Löwenheim-Skolem and Omitting Types theorems in Transition Algebra, a logical system obtained by enhancing many sorted first-order logic with features from dynamic logic. The sentences we consider include compositions, unions, and transitive closures of transition relations, which are treated similarly to actions in dynamic logics to define necessity and possibility operators. We show that Upward Löwenheim-Skolem theorem, any form of compactness, and joint Robinson consistency property fail due to the expressivity of transitive closures of transitions. In this non-compact many-sorted logical system, we develop a forcing technique method by generalizing the classical method of forcing used by Keisler to prove Omitting Types theorem. Instead of working within a single signature, we work with a directed diagram of signatures, which allows us to establish Downward Löwenheim-Skolem and Omitting Types theorems despite the fact that models interpret sorts as sets, possibly empty. Building on a complete system of proof rules for Transition Algebra, we extend it with additional proof rules to reason about constructor-based and/or finite transition algebras. We then establish the completeness of this extended system for a fragment of Transition Algebra obtained by restricting models to constructor-based and/or finite transition algebras.
Cite as

Go Hashimoto and Daniel Găină. Model-Theoretic Forcing in Transition Algebra. In 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 345, pp. 55:1-55:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hashimoto_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.55,
  author =	{Hashimoto, Go and G\u{a}in\u{a}, Daniel},
  title =	{{Model-Theoretic Forcing in Transition Algebra}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)},
  pages =	{55:1--55:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-388-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{345},
  editor =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Mazowiecki, Filip and Skrzypczak, Micha{\l}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.55},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-241629},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.55},
  annote =	{Keywords: institutional model theory, algebraic specification, transition algebra, forcing, omitting types property, L\"{o}wenheim-Skolem properties, completeness}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.170
First-Order Intuitionistic Linear Logic and Hypergraph Languages

Authors: Tikhon Pshenitsyn

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
The Lambek calculus is a substructural logic known to be closely related to the formal language theory: on the one hand, it is used for generating formal languages by means of categorial grammars and, on the other hand, it has formal language semantics, with respect to which it is sound and complete. This paper studies a similar relation between first-order intuitionistic linear logic ILL1 along with its multiplicative fragment MILL1 on the one hand and the hypergraph grammar theory on the other. In the first part, we introduce a novel concept of hypergraph first-order logic categorial grammar, which is a generalisation of string MILL1 grammars introduced in Richard Moot’s works. We prove that hypergraph ILL1 grammars generate all recursively enumerable hypergraph languages and that hypergraph MILL1 grammars are as powerful as linear-time hypergraph transformation systems. In addition, we show that the class of languages generated by string MILL1 grammars is closed under intersection and that it includes a non-semilinear language as well as an NP-complete one. This shows how much more powerful string MILL1 grammars are as compared to Lambek categorial grammars. In the second part, we develop hypergraph language models for MILL1. In such models, formulae of the logic are interpreted as hypergraph languages and multiplicative conjunction is interpreted using parallel composition, which is one of the operations of HR-algebras introduced by Courcelle. We prove completeness of the universal-implicative fragment of MILL1 with respect to these models and thus present a new kind of semantics for a fragment of first-order linear logic.
Cite as

Tikhon Pshenitsyn. First-Order Intuitionistic Linear Logic and Hypergraph Languages. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 170:1-170:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pshenitsyn:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.170,
  author =	{Pshenitsyn, Tikhon},
  title =	{{First-Order Intuitionistic Linear Logic and Hypergraph Languages}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{170:1--170:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.170},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235473},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.170},
  annote =	{Keywords: linear logic, categorial grammar, MILL1 grammar, first-order logic, hypergraph language, graph transformation, language semantics, HR-algebra}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.34
Semantics for "Enough-Certainty" and Fitting's Embedding of Classical Logic in S4

Authors: Gergei Bana and Mitsuhiro Okada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 62, 25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016)

Abstract
In this work we look at how Fitting's embedding of first-order classical logic into first-order S4 can help in reasoning when we are interested in satisfaction "in most cases", when first-order properties are allowed to fail in cases that are considered insignificant. We extend classical semantics by combining a Kripke-style model construction of "significant" events as possible worlds with the forcing-Fitting-style semantics construction by embedding classical logic into S4. We provide various examples. Our main running example is an application to symbolic security protocol verification with complexity-theoretic guarantees. In particular, we show how Fitting's embedding emerges entirely naturally when verifying trace properties in computer security.
Cite as

Gergei Bana and Mitsuhiro Okada. Semantics for "Enough-Certainty" and Fitting's Embedding of Classical Logic in S4. In 25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 62, pp. 34:1-34:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bana_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2016.34,
  author =	{Bana, Gergei and Okada, Mitsuhiro},
  title =	{{Semantics for "Enough-Certainty" and Fitting's Embedding of Classical Logic in S4}},
  booktitle =	{25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-022-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{62},
  editor =	{Talbot, Jean-Marc and Regnier, Laurent},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-65746},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: first-order logic, possible-world semantics, Fitting embedding, asymptotic probabilities, verification of complexity-theoretic properties}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2013.4
Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness and Husserl's Term Rewrite-based Theory of Multiplicity (Invited Talk)

Authors: Mitsuhiro Okada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 21, 24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2013)

Abstract
Hilbert and Husserl presented axiomatic arithmetic theories in different ways and proposed two different notions of 'completeness' for arithmetic, at the turning of the 20th Century (1900-1901). The former led to the completion axiom, the latter completion of rewriting. We look into the latter in comparison with the former. The key notion to understand the latter is the notion of definite multiplicity or manifold (Mannigfaltigkeit). We show that his notion of multiplicity is understood by means of term rewrite theory in a very coherent manner, and that his notion of 'definite' multiplicity is understood as the relational web (or tissue) structure, the core part of which is a 'convergent' term rewrite proof structure. We examine how Husserl introduced his term rewrite theory in 1901 in the context of a controversy with Hilbert on the notion of completeness, and in the context of solving the justification problem of the use of imaginaries in mathematics, which was an important issue in the foundations of mathematics in the period.
Cite as

Mitsuhiro Okada. Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness and Husserl's Term Rewrite-based Theory of Multiplicity (Invited Talk). In 24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 21, pp. 4-19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{okada:LIPIcs.RTA.2013.4,
  author =	{Okada, Mitsuhiro},
  title =	{{Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness and Husserl's Term Rewrite-based Theory of Multiplicity}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2013)},
  pages =	{4--19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-53-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{21},
  editor =	{van Raamsdonk, Femke},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2013.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-40524},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2013.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: History of term rewrite theory, Husserl, Hilbert, proof theory, Knuth-Bendix completion}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 6 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 3 2025
  • 1 2016
  • 1 2013

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Okada, Mitsuhiro
  • 1 Bana, Gergei
  • 1 Clairambault, Pierre
  • 1 Găină, Daniel
  • 1 Hashimoto, Go
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 6 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Denotational semantics
  • 1 Theory of computation → Equational logic and rewriting
  • 1 Theory of computation → Grammars and context-free languages
  • 1 Theory of computation → Linear logic
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 first-order logic
  • 1 Denotational semantics
  • 1 Fitting embedding
  • 1 Game semantics
  • 1 HR-algebra
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact