5 Search Results for "Patel, Sarvar"


Document
Lower Bounds on FSS from Dynamic Data Structures

Authors: Niv Gilboa and Daniel Weber

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
In Function Secret Sharing (FSS), a dealer with a given function f: {0,1}ⁿ → 𝔾 from n bits to a commutative group 𝔾 such that f is in a function class ℱ shares succinct keys with two properties. Evaluating each key separately on a common input x results in additive shares of f(x) and any subset of the keys does not provide information on f. Two-party FSS schemes which are reducible to One-way Functions (OWF) have applications in cryptography, complexity, and in practical data security systems. We establish a two-way transformation between a two-party FSS scheme for a function class ℱ, which is black-box reducible to an OWF, or even black-box reducible to a family of Pseudo-Random Functions (PRF) and a dynamic data structure that supports range queries on ℱ. A data structure of this type enables dynamically adding functions to a multiset of functions F ⊆ ℱ, and answering range queries on the output of F, i.e., returning ∑_{f ∈ F} f(x) for a query x. The data structures are defined in one of several models which abstract RAM. The correspondence together with known lower bounds on the update time and the query time in data structures leads to the first non-trivial lower bounds on FSS schemes which are black-box reducible to PRF. These lower bounds apply to FSS schemes with polynomial key size and include: - For ℱ^d_{box}, the class of all functions which assign a constant group element β ∈ 𝔾 to any input in a specified d-dimensional box and 0 to all other inputs: if the key sharing function, Gen, runs in time polynomial in n and the evaluation function is Eval then: - If d ≥ 2 and 𝔾 = ℤ₂ then Eval’s running time is Ω ((n^{3/2})/(log³ n)). - If d ≥ 2 and 𝔾 is cyclic such that log |𝔾| = (1 + ε) n then Eval’s running time is Ω ((n/(log n)) ²). - If d > 2 is a constant and further, Gen and Eval correspond to operations on data structures in the Oblivious Group Model (this includes all known FSS from OWF techniques), then the product of Eval’s time and the key size is Ω(n^{d-1}). - For ℱ_{mono}, the class of all monomials ax^b ∈ 𝔽_{2ⁿ}[X] such that b ≤ B, assuming n^{ω(1)} ≤ B ≤ 2^{n/4}: if Gen runs in polynomial time, then Eval’s running time is Ω ((n √{log B})/(log² n)).

Cite as

Niv Gilboa and Daniel Weber. Lower Bounds on FSS from Dynamic Data Structures. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 71:1-71:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gilboa_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.71,
  author =	{Gilboa, Niv and Weber, Daniel},
  title =	{{Lower Bounds on FSS from Dynamic Data Structures}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{71:1--71:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.71},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253585},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.71},
  annote =	{Keywords: FSS, Data Structures, Lower Bounds, Black-Box Reductions}
}
Document
MetaDORAM: Info-Theoretic Distributed ORAM with Less Communication

Authors: Brett Hemenway Falk, Daniel Noble, and Rafail Ostrovsky

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 343, 6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025)


Abstract
A Distributed Oblivious RAM is a multi-party protocol that securely implements a RAM functionality on secret-shared inputs and outputs. This paper presents two information-theoretically secure DORAMs whose communication costs are asymptotic improvements over the state of the art. Let n be the number of memory locations and let d be the bit-length of each location. The first, MetaDORAM1, is statistically secure, with n^{-ω(1)} leakage. It has amortized O(log_b(n) d + b ω(1) log(n) + log³(n)/log(log(n))) bits of communication per memory access. Here, b ≥ 2 is a free parameter and ω(1) is any super-constant function (in n). The most communication-efficient prior statistically secure DORAM was that of Abraham et al (PKC 2017), which has cost O(log_b(n) d + b ω(1) log_b(n) log²(n)). MetaDORAM1 is a Θ(ω(1) log(log(n)))-factor improvement over the work of Abraham et al whenever d = O(log²(n)). The second protocol, MetaDORAM2, achieves perfect security. It has amortized communication cost O(log_b(n)d + b log(n) + log³(n)/log(log(n))) where, again, b ≥ 2 is a free parameter. The best prior perfectly secure DORAM is that of Chan et al (ASIACRYPT 2018) which has communication cost O(log(n) d + log³(n)). MetaDORAM2 is therefore a Ω(log(log(n)))-factor improvement over the DORAM of Chan et al under any parameter range (by setting b = log(n)) and is a Θ(log(n))-factor improvement for d = Ω(n^ε) for any constant ε > 0 (by setting b = d/log(n)). Our work is the first perfectly secure DORAM with sub-logarithmic communication overhead. MetaDORAM2 comes at the cost of a once-off (for any given n) setup phase which requires exponential (in n) computation. Both DORAMs are in the 3-party setting with security against 1 semi-honest, static corruption. By a trivial transformation, these can be transformed, respectively, into statistically and perfectly secure active 3-server ORAM protocols secure against 1 corrupt server, with the same communication costs. These multi-server ORAM protocols are likewise asymptotic improvements over the state of the art.

Cite as

Brett Hemenway Falk, Daniel Noble, and Rafail Ostrovsky. MetaDORAM: Info-Theoretic Distributed ORAM with Less Communication. In 6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 343, pp. 6:1-6:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{falk_et_al:LIPIcs.ITC.2025.6,
  author =	{Falk, Brett Hemenway and Noble, Daniel and Ostrovsky, Rafail},
  title =	{{MetaDORAM: Info-Theoretic Distributed ORAM with Less Communication}},
  booktitle =	{6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-385-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{343},
  editor =	{Gilboa, Niv},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243560},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: ORAM, MPC, DORAM, multi-server ORAM, active ORAM}
}
Document
Infinitely Divisible Noise for Differential Privacy: Nearly Optimal Error in the High ε Regime

Authors: Charlie Harrison and Pasin Manurangsi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)


Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) can be achieved in a distributed manner, where multiple parties add independent noise such that their sum protects the overall dataset with DP. A common technique here is for each party to sample their noise from the decomposition of an infinitely divisible distribution. We analyze two mechanisms in this setting: 1) the generalized discrete Laplace (GDL) mechanism, whose distribution (which is closed under summation) follows from differences of i.i.d. negative binomial shares, and 2) the multi-scale discrete Laplace (MSDLap) mechanism, a novel mechanism following the sum of multiple i.i.d. discrete Laplace shares at different scales. For ε ≥ 1, our mechanisms can be parameterized to have O(Δ³ e^{-ε}) and O(min(Δ³ e^{-ε}, Δ² e^{-2ε/3})) MSE, respectively, where Δ denote the sensitivity; the latter bound matches known optimality results. Furthermore, the MSDLap mechanism has the optimal MSE including constants as ε → ∞. We also show a transformation from the discrete setting to the continuous setting, which allows us to transform both mechanisms to the continuous setting and thereby achieve the optimal O(Δ² e^{-2ε / 3}) MSE. To our knowledge, these are the first infinitely divisible additive noise mechanisms that achieve order-optimal MSE under pure DP for either the discrete or continuous setting, so our work shows formally there is no separation in utility when query-independent noise adding mechanisms are restricted to infinitely divisible noise. For the continuous setting, our result improves upon Pagh and Stausholm’s Arete distribution which gives an MSE of O(Δ² e^{-ε/4}) [Pagh and Stausholm, 2022]. Furthermore, we give an exact sampler tuned to efficiently implement the MSDLap mechanism, and we apply our results to improve a state of the art multi-message shuffle DP protocol from [Balle et al., 2020] in the high ε regime.

Cite as

Charlie Harrison and Pasin Manurangsi. Infinitely Divisible Noise for Differential Privacy: Nearly Optimal Error in the High ε Regime. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 12:1-12:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{harrison_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.12,
  author =	{Harrison, Charlie and Manurangsi, Pasin},
  title =	{{Infinitely Divisible Noise for Differential Privacy: Nearly Optimal Error in the High \epsilon Regime}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231396},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Privacy, Distributed Noise Addition}
}
Document
Differential Privacy on Trust Graphs

Authors: Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, and Serena Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)


Abstract
We study differential privacy (DP) in a multi-party setting where each party only trusts a (known) subset of the other parties with its data. Specifically, given a trust graph where vertices correspond to parties and neighbors are mutually trusting, we give a DP algorithm for aggregation with a much better privacy-utility trade-off than in the well-studied local model of DP (where each party trusts no other party). We further study a robust variant where each party trusts all but an unknown subset of at most t of its neighbors (where t is a given parameter), and give an algorithm for this setting. We complement our algorithms with lower bounds, and discuss implications of our work to other tasks in private learning and analytics.

Cite as

Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, and Serena Wang. Differential Privacy on Trust Graphs. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 53:1-53:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ghazi_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.53,
  author =	{Ghazi, Badih and Kumar, Ravi and Manurangsi, Pasin and Wang, Serena},
  title =	{{Differential Privacy on Trust Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{53:1--53:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.53},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226816},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.53},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, trust graphs, minimum dominating set, packing number}
}
Document
CacheShuffle: A Family of Oblivious Shuffles

Authors: Sarvar Patel, Giuseppe Persiano, and Kevin Yeo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 107, 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2018)


Abstract
We consider oblivious two-party protocols where a client outsources N blocks of private data to a server. The client wishes to access the data to perform operations in such a way that the access pattern does not leak information about the data and the operations. In this context, we consider oblivious shuffling with a focus on bandwidth efficient protocols for clients with small local memory. In the shuffling problem, the N outsourced blocks, B_1,...,B_N, are stored on the server according to an initial permutation pi. The client wishes to reshuffle the blocks according to permutation sigma. Oblivious shuffling is a building block in several applications that hide patterns of data access. In this paper, we introduce a generalization of the oblivious shuffling problem, the K-oblivious shuffling problem, and provide bandwidth efficient algorithms for a wide range of client storage requirements. The task of a K-oblivious shuffling algorithm is to shuffle N encrypted blocks that were previously randomly allocated on the server in such a way that an adversarial server learns nothing about either the new allocation of blocks or the block contents. The security guarantee must hold when an adversary has partial information on the initial placement of a subset of K <=N revealed blocks. The notion of oblivious shuffling is obtained for K=N. We first study the N-oblivious shuffling problem and start by presenting CacheShuffleRoot, that is tailored for clients with O(sqrt{N}) blocks of memory and uses approximately 4N blocks of bandwidth. CacheShuffleRoot is a 4x improvement over the previous best known N-oblivious shuffle for practical sizes of N. We then generalize CacheShuffleRoot to CacheShuffle that can be instantiated for any client memory size S and requires O(N log_S N) blocks of bandwidth. Next, we present K-oblivious shuffling algorithms that require 2N + f(K,S) blocks of bandwidth for all K and a wide range of S. Any extra bandwidth above the 2N lower bound depends solely on K and S. Specifically, for clients with O(K) blocks of memory, we present KCacheShuffleBasic that uses exactly 2N blocks of bandwidth. For clients with memory S <= K, we present KCacheShuffle, that requires 2N + O(K log_S K) blocks of bandwidth. Finally, motivated by applications to ORAMs, we consider the case where the server stores D dummy blocks whose contents are irrelevant in addition to the N real blocks. For this case, we design algorithm KCacheShuffleDummy that shuffles N+D blocks with K revealed blocks using O(K) blocks of client storage and approximately D+2N blocks of bandwidth.

Cite as

Sarvar Patel, Giuseppe Persiano, and Kevin Yeo. CacheShuffle: A Family of Oblivious Shuffles. In 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 107, pp. 161:1-161:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{patel_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.161,
  author =	{Patel, Sarvar and Persiano, Giuseppe and Yeo, Kevin},
  title =	{{CacheShuffle: A Family of Oblivious Shuffles}},
  booktitle =	{45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2018)},
  pages =	{161:1--161:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-076-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{107},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Kaklamanis, Christos and Marx, D\'{a}niel and Sannella, Donald},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.161},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-91651},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.161},
  annote =	{Keywords: Shuffling, Data-Oblivious Algorithms}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 5 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 3 2025
  • 1 2018

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Manurangsi, Pasin
  • 1 Falk, Brett Hemenway
  • 1 Ghazi, Badih
  • 1 Gilboa, Niv
  • 1 Harrison, Charlie
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 5 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Security and privacy → Information-theoretic techniques
  • 2 Security and privacy → Management and querying of encrypted data
  • 1 Information systems → Data encryption
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Distribution functions
  • 1 Security and privacy
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Black-Box Reductions
  • 1 DORAM
  • 1 Data Structures
  • 1 Data-Oblivious Algorithms
  • 1 Differential Privacy
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail