80 Search Results for "Roth, Aaron"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 156

1st Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2020)

FORC 2020, June 1-3, 2020, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA (Virtual Conference)

Editors: Aaron Roth

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.17
Incremental Strongly Connected Components with Predictions

Authors: Ronald Deng, Samuel McCauley, Aidin Niaparast, Helia Niaparast, Bennett Ptak, Shirel Quintanilla, Shikha Singh, and Nathan Vosburg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 370, 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)

Abstract
Algorithms with predictions is a growing area that aims to leverage machine-learned predictions to design faster beyond-worst-case algorithms. In this paper, we use this framework to design a learned data structure for the incremental strongly connected components (SCC) problem. In this problem, the n vertices of a graph are known a priori and the m directed edges arrive over time. The goal is to efficiently maintain the strongly connected components of the graph after each insert. Our algorithm receives a possibly erroneous prediction of the edge sequence and uses it to precompute partial solutions to support fast inserts. We show that our algorithm achieves nearly optimal bounds with good predictions and its performance smoothly degrades with the prediction error. We also implement our data structure and perform experiments on real datasets. Our empirical results show that the theory is predictive of practical runtime improvements.
Cite as

Ronald Deng, Samuel McCauley, Aidin Niaparast, Helia Niaparast, Bennett Ptak, Shirel Quintanilla, Shikha Singh, and Nathan Vosburg. Incremental Strongly Connected Components with Predictions. In 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 370, pp. 17:1-17:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deng_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.17,
  author =	{Deng, Ronald and McCauley, Samuel and Niaparast, Aidin and Niaparast, Helia and Ptak, Bennett and Quintanilla, Shirel and Singh, Shikha and Vosburg, Nathan},
  title =	{{Incremental Strongly Connected Components with Predictions}},
  booktitle =	{20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-421-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{370},
  editor =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260530},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: algorithms with predictions, learning augmented algorithms, incremental graph algorithms, strongly connected components, data structures}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.19
Constant-Factor Approximations for Doubly Constrained Fair k-Center, k-Median and k-Means

Authors: Nicole Funk, Annika Hennes, Johanna Hillebrand, and Sarah Sturm

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 370, 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)

Abstract
We study discrete k-clustering problems in general metric spaces that are constrained by a combination of two different fairness conditions within the demographic fairness model. Given a metric space (P,d), where every point in P is equipped with a protected attribute, and a number k, the goal is to partition P into k clusters with a designated center each, such that a center-based objective function is minimized and the attributes are fairly distributed with respect to the following two fairness concepts: 1) group fairness: We aim for clusters with balanced numbers of attributes by specifying lower and upper bounds for the desired attribute proportions. 2) diverse center selection: Clusters have natural representatives, i.e., their centers. We ask for a balanced set of representatives by specifying the desired number of centers to choose from each attribute. Dickerson, Esmaeili, Morgenstern, and Pena [John P. Dickerson et al., 2023] denote the combination of these two constraints as doubly constrained fair clustering. They present algorithms whose guarantees depend on the best known approximation factors for either of these problems. Currently, this implies an 8-approximation with a small additive violation on the group fairness constraint. For k-center, we improve this approximation factor to 4 with a small additive violation. This guarantee also depends on the currently best algorithm for DS-fair k-center given by Jones, Nguyen and Nguyen [Matthew Jones et al., 2020]. For k-median and k-means, we propose the first constant-factor approximation algorithms. Our algorithms transform a solution that satisfies diverse center selection into a doubly constrained fair clustering using an LP-based approach. Furthermore, our results are generalizable to other center-selection constraints, such as matroid k-clustering and knapsack constraints.
Cite as

Nicole Funk, Annika Hennes, Johanna Hillebrand, and Sarah Sturm. Constant-Factor Approximations for Doubly Constrained Fair k-Center, k-Median and k-Means. In 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 370, pp. 19:1-19:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{funk_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.19,
  author =	{Funk, Nicole and Hennes, Annika and Hillebrand, Johanna and Sturm, Sarah},
  title =	{{Constant-Factor Approximations for Doubly Constrained Fair k-Center, k-Median and k-Means}},
  booktitle =	{20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-421-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{370},
  editor =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260551},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Clustering, Fairness, Approximation Algorithms, k-center, k-median, k-means}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.12
Tradeoffs in Privacy, Welfare, and Fairness for Facility Location

Authors: Sara Fish, Yannai A. Gonczarowski, Jason Z. Tang, and Salil Vadhan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
The differentially private (DP) facility location problem seeks to determine a socially optimal placement for a public facility while ensuring that each participating agent’s location remains private. In order to privatize its input data, a DP mechanism must inject noise into its output distribution, producing a placement that will have lower expected social welfare than the optimal spot for the facility. The privacy-induced welfare loss can be viewed as the "cost of privacy," illustrating a tradeoff between social welfare and privacy that has been the focus of prior work. Yet, the imposition of privacy also induces a third consideration that has not been similarly studied: fairness in how the "cost of privacy" is distributed across individuals. For instance, a mechanism may satisfy differential privacy with minimal social welfare loss, yet still be undesirable if that loss falls entirely on one individual. In this paper, we quantify this new notion of unfairness and design mechanisms for facility location that attempt to simultaneously optimize across these three objectives of privacy, social welfare, and fairness. Under this setup, we first derive an impossibility result, showing that privacy and fairness cannot be simultaneously guaranteed over all possible datasets that could represent the locations of individuals in a population. We then consider a relaxation of the original problem that still requires worst-case differential privacy, but only seeks fairness and appealing social welfare over smaller, more "realistic-looking" families of datasets. For this relaxation, we construct a DP mechanism and demonstrate that it is simultaneously optimal (or, for a harder family of datasets, near-optimal up to small factors) on fairness and social welfare. This suggests that while there is a tradeoff between privacy and each of social welfare and fairness, there is no additional tradeoff when we consider all three objectives simultaneously, provided that the population data is sufficiently natural.
Cite as

Sara Fish, Yannai A. Gonczarowski, Jason Z. Tang, and Salil Vadhan. Tradeoffs in Privacy, Welfare, and Fairness for Facility Location. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 12:1-12:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fish_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.12,
  author =	{Fish, Sara and Gonczarowski, Yannai A. and Tang, Jason Z. and Vadhan, Salil},
  title =	{{Tradeoffs in Privacy, Welfare, and Fairness for Facility Location}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259858},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, facility location, fairness, mechanism design}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.8
Can We Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?

Authors: Noam Mazor, Andrew Morgan, and Rafael Pass

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
A recent and exciting thread of work focuses on developing methods for watermarking the output of large language models (LLMs). We focus on provably undetectable watermarking - that is, schemes that do not alter the output distribution of the LLM, yet enable embedding a watermark in the output that identifies the output as having been generated by the particular LLM. Furthermore, the watermark should be hard to remove by an adversary that may potentially edit, insert, or delete tokens from the watermarked output. Indeed, recent work (Christ et al. [COLT'24], Christ et al. [CRYPTO’24], Golowich et al. [NeuroIPS’24]) shows how to develop such schemes that are robust against a constant fraction of substitutions, or even against a constant fraction of arbitrary edits. These works, however, make strong assumptions on the amount of entropy present in the output of the LLM. Most notably, they all require constant entropy rate - that is, a constant fraction of the tokens in a sufficiently long substring of the output need to have empirical entropy at least O(log |T|), where T is the alphabet of tokens, and Golowich et al. additionally require T to be larger than the security parameter. In this work, we consider the question of whether we can also watermark the outputs of LLMs when the per-token entropy is just a constant, discarding the dependence on the alphabet size or security parameter. In this regime, we construct: - A watermarking scheme robust against random substitutions (assuming subexponential LPN, as in Christ et al. [CRYPTO’24]) - A watermarking scheme robust against random substitutions and random deletions, given either the additional heuristic assumption that the output of the LLM only introduces random errors (analogous to the assumption made by Christ et al. [CRYPTO’24]) or a construction of a pseudorandom error-correcting code robust to adversarial substitutions and random deletions.
Cite as

Noam Mazor, Andrew Morgan, and Rafael Pass. Can We Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 8:1-8:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mazor_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.8,
  author =	{Mazor, Noam and Morgan, Andrew and Pass, Rafael},
  title =	{{Can We Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259809},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Cryptography, Generative Models, Watermarking, Pseudorandom Codes}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.1
Computational Hardness of Private Coreset

Authors: Badih Ghazi, Cristóbal Guzmán, Pritish Kamath, Alexander Knop, Ravi Kumar, and Pasin Manurangsi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
We study the problem of differentially private (DP) computation of coreset for the k-means objective. For a given input set of points, a coreset is another set of points such that the k-means objective for any candidate solution is preserved up to a multiplicative (1 ± α) factor (and some additive factor). We prove the first computational lower bounds for this problem. Specifically, assuming the existence of one-way functions, we show that no polynomial-time (ε, 1/n^{ω(1)})-DP algorithm can compute a coreset for k-means in the 𝓁_∞-metric for some constant α > 0 (and some constant additive factor), even for k = 3. For k-means in the Euclidean metric, we show a similar result but only for α = Θ(1/d²), where d is the dimension.
Cite as

Badih Ghazi, Cristóbal Guzmán, Pritish Kamath, Alexander Knop, Ravi Kumar, and Pasin Manurangsi. Computational Hardness of Private Coreset. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 1:1-1:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ghazi_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.1,
  author =	{Ghazi, Badih and Guzm\'{a}n, Crist\'{o}bal and Kamath, Pritish and Knop, Alexander and Kumar, Ravi and Manurangsi, Pasin},
  title =	{{Computational Hardness of Private Coreset}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259725},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differentially Private Clustering, Coreset, Cryptographic Hardness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.3
Exact zCDP Characterizations for Fundamental Differentially Private Mechanisms

Authors: Charlie Harrison and Pasin Manurangsi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
Zero-concentrated differential privacy (zCDP) is a variant of differential privacy (DP) that is widely used partly due to its nice composition property. While a tight conversion from ε-DP to zCDP exists for the worst-case mechanism, many common algorithms satisfy stronger guarantees. In this work, we derive tight zCDP characterizations for several fundamental mechanisms. We prove that the tight zCDP bound for the ε-DP Laplace mechanism is exactly ε + e^{-ε} - 1, confirming a recent conjecture by Wang [Yu-Xiang Wang, 2022]. We further provide tight bounds for the discrete Laplace mechanism, k-Randomized Response (for k ≤ 6), and RAPPOR. Lastly, we also provide a tight zCDP bound for the worst case bounded range mechanism.
Cite as

Charlie Harrison and Pasin Manurangsi. Exact zCDP Characterizations for Fundamental Differentially Private Mechanisms. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{harrison_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.3,
  author =	{Harrison, Charlie and Manurangsi, Pasin},
  title =	{{Exact zCDP Characterizations for Fundamental Differentially Private Mechanisms}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259741},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Zero-Concentrated Differentially Privacy, Laplace Mechanism, Randomized Response}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.4
Nearly-Optimal Private Selection via Gaussian Mechanism

Authors: Ethan Leeman and Pasin Manurangsi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
Steinke [2025] recently asked the following intriguing open question: Can we solve the differentially private selection problem with nearly-optimal error by only (adaptively) invoking Gaussian mechanism on low-sensitivity queries? We resolve this question positively. In particular, for a candidate set 𝒴, we achieve error guarantee of Õ(log |𝒴|), which is within a factor of (log log |𝒴|)^{O(1)} of the exponential mechanism [McSherry and Talwar, 2007]. This improves on Steinke’s mechanism which achieves an error of O(log^{3/2} |𝒴|).
Cite as

Ethan Leeman and Pasin Manurangsi. Nearly-Optimal Private Selection via Gaussian Mechanism. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 4:1-4:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{leeman_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.4,
  author =	{Leeman, Ethan and Manurangsi, Pasin},
  title =	{{Nearly-Optimal Private Selection via Gaussian Mechanism}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259750},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differentially Private Selection, Gaussian Mechanism}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.15
Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems

Authors: Xinyan Hu, Meena Jagadeesan, Michael I. Jordan, and Jacob Steinhardt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
In content recommender systems such as TikTok and YouTube, the platform’s recommendation algorithm shapes content producer incentives. Many platforms employ online learning, which generates intertemporal incentives, since content produced today affects recommendations of future content. We study the game between producers and analyze the content created at equilibrium. We prove that standard online learning algorithms, such as Hedge and EXP3, unfortunately incentivize producers to create low-quality content, where producers' effort approaches zero in the long run for typical learning rate schedules. Motivated by this negative result, we design learning algorithms that incentivize producers to invest high effort and achieve high user welfare. At a conceptual level, our work illustrates the unintended impact that a platform’s learning algorithm can have on content quality and introduces algorithmic approaches to mitigating these effects.
Cite as

Xinyan Hu, Meena Jagadeesan, Michael I. Jordan, and Jacob Steinhardt. Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 15:1-15:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hu_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.15,
  author =	{Hu, Xinyan and Jagadeesan, Meena and Jordan, Michael I. and Steinhardt, Jacob},
  title =	{{Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259887},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: recommender systems, content quality, producer incentives, online learning, algorithmic game theory, Stackelberg games}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17
Protecting the Undeleted in Machine Unlearning

Authors: Aloni Cohen, Refael Kohen, Kobbi Nissim, and Uri Stemmer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
Machine unlearning aims to remove specific data points from a trained model, often striving to emulate "perfect retraining", i.e., producing the model that would have been obtained had the deleted data never been included. We demonstrate that this approach, and security definitions that enable it, carry significant privacy risks for the remaining (undeleted) data points. We present a reconstruction attack showing that for certain tasks, which can be computed securely without deletions, a mechanism adhering to perfect retraining allows an adversary controlling merely ω(1) data points to reconstruct almost the entire dataset simply by issuing deletion requests. We survey existing definitions for machine unlearning, showing they are either susceptible to such attacks or too restrictive to support basic functionalities like exact summation. To address this problem, we propose a new security definition that specifically safeguards undeleted data against leakage caused by the deletion of other points. We show that our definition permits several essential functionalities, such as bulletin boards, summations, and statistical learning.
Cite as

Aloni Cohen, Refael Kohen, Kobbi Nissim, and Uri Stemmer. Protecting the Undeleted in Machine Unlearning. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 17:1-17:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17,
  author =	{Cohen, Aloni and Kohen, Refael and Nissim, Kobbi and Stemmer, Uri},
  title =	{{Protecting the Undeleted in Machine Unlearning}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259901},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Unlearning, data deletion, privacy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.18
A Differentially Private Approximation of the Width Problem

Authors: Mor Hale and Or Sheffet

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
The width of a point set - the minimum distance between two parallel hyperplanes enclosing the data - is a fundamental geometric measure that captures how "flat" or "fat" a dataset is. As such, it serves as a basic shape descriptor used in visualization, convex hull approximation, and geometric data analysis. Despite its importance, width is highly sensitive to single-point changes, and no differentially private algorithm for approximating it was previously known. We present the first pure ε-differentially private algorithm that approximates the width of a dataset. Our algorithm is a private adaptation of Chan’s approximation scheme [Chan, 2000] and operates by privately approximating the solution to a collection of suitably formulated linear programs. In addition to estimating the width, our method privately identifies a corresponding direction, enabling a private "fattening" transformation of the dataset - a basic structural preprocessing step for many geometric algorithms. This work advances the understanding of how geometric shape descriptors can admit good approximations even under the constraints of differential privacy.
Cite as

Mor Hale and Or Sheffet. A Differentially Private Approximation of the Width Problem. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 18:1-18:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hale_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.18,
  author =	{Hale, Mor and Sheffet, Or},
  title =	{{A Differentially Private Approximation of the Width Problem}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259914},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, computational geometry, width approximation, private algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20
Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation

Authors: Ben Jacobsen and Nitin Kohli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
Algorithmic predictions are increasingly used to inform the allocation of scarce resources. The promise of these methods is that, through machine learning, they can better identify the people who would benefit most from interventions. Recently, however, several works have called this assumption into question by demonstrating the existence of settings where simple, unit-level allocation strategies can meet or even exceed the performance of those based on individual-level targeting. Separately, other works have objected to individual-level targeting on privacy grounds, leading to an unusual situation where a single solution, unit-level targeting, is recommended for reasons of both privacy and utility. Motivated by the desire to fully understand the interplay of privacy and targeting levels, we initiate the study of aid allocation systems that satisfy differential privacy, synthesizing existing works on private optimization with the economic models of aid allocation used in the non-private literature. To this end, we investigate private variants of both individual and unit-level allocation strategies in both stochastic and distribution-free settings under a range of constraints on data availability. Through this analysis, we provide clean, interpretable bounds characterizing the tradeoffs between privacy, efficiency, and targeting precision in allocation.
Cite as

Ben Jacobsen and Nitin Kohli. Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 20:1-20:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jacobsen_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20,
  author =	{Jacobsen, Ben and Kohli, Nitin},
  title =	{{Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259935},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, fair allocation, limits of prediction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22
Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation

Authors: Mark Bun, Marco Gaboardi, and Connor Wagaman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
We resolve an open question of Jain, Raskhodnikova, Sivakumar, and Smith (ICML 2023) by exhibiting a problem separating differential privacy under continual observation in the oblivious and adaptive settings. The continual observation (a.k.a. continual release) model formalizes privacy for streaming algorithms, where data is received over time and output is released at each time step. In the oblivious setting, privacy need only hold for data streams fixed in advance; in the adaptive setting, privacy is required even for streams that can be chosen adaptively based on the streaming algorithm’s output. We describe the first explicit separation between the oblivious and adaptive settings. The problem showing this separation is based on the correlated vector queries problem of Bun, Steinke, and Ullman (SODA 2017). Specifically, we present an (ε,0)-DP algorithm for the oblivious setting that remains accurate for exponentially many time steps in the dimension of the input. On the other hand, we show that every (ε,δ)-DP adaptive algorithm fails to be accurate after releasing output for only a constant number of time steps.
Cite as

Mark Bun, Marco Gaboardi, and Connor Wagaman. Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 22:1-22:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bun_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22,
  author =	{Bun, Mark and Gaboardi, Marco and Wagaman, Connor},
  title =	{{Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:11},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259959},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, continual observation, continual release, streaming algorithms, adaptive algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.25
The Typical Algebraic Shifting of Graphs and Surfaces

Authors: Denys Bulavka, Eran Nevo, and Yuval Peled

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)

Abstract
We initiate a statistical study of Kalai’s exterior algebraic shifting, focusing on concentration phenomena for random triangulations of a fixed space. First, for a uniform n-vertex refinement of any given graph G, we show that asymptotically almost-surely (a.a.s.) its exterior algebraic shifting is an explicit shifted graph depending only on n and the Betti numbers of G. Next, for any given compact connected Riemannian surface S, sample n points independently at random according to the volume measure, and consider the resulted a.a.s. unique Delaunay triangulation. We prove that a.a.s. its exterior algebraic shifting is an explicit shifted complex depending only on n and the Euler genus of S, and in particular is area-rigid. In both results the expected shifted complex is a homology lex-segment complex, a notion we define combinatorially and characterize numerically à la Björner-Kalai. As a tool to prove the result on surfaces, we prove a universality result on edge contractions: for every fixed surface triangulation K, every dense enough point set in the surface yields a Delaunay triangulation that edge contracts to K.
Cite as

Denys Bulavka, Eran Nevo, and Yuval Peled. The Typical Algebraic Shifting of Graphs and Surfaces. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 25:1-25:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bulavka_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.25,
  author =	{Bulavka, Denys and Nevo, Eran and Peled, Yuval},
  title =	{{The Typical Algebraic Shifting of Graphs and Surfaces}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258312},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic shifting, Delaunay triangulation, surfaces, random triangulation, area rigidity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.94
Smoothed Analysis of Online Metric Matching with a Single Sample: Beyond Metric Distortion

Authors: Yingxi Li, Ellen Vitercik, and Mingwei Yang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
In the online metric matching problem, n servers and n requests lie in a metric space. Servers are available upfront, and requests arrive sequentially. An arriving request must be matched immediately and irrevocably to an available server, incurring a cost equal to their distance. The goal is to minimize the total matching cost. We study this problem in [0, 1]^d with the Euclidean metric, when servers are adversarial and requests are independently drawn from distinct distributions that satisfy a mild smoothness condition. Our main result is an O(1)-competitive algorithm for d ≠ 2 that requires no distributional knowledge, relying only on a single sample from each request distribution. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm to achieve an o(log n) competitive ratio for non-trivial metrics beyond the i.i.d. setting. Our approach bypasses the Ω(log n) barrier introduced by probabilistic metric embeddings: instead of analyzing the embedding distortion and the algorithm separately, we directly bound the cost of the algorithm on the target metric space of a simple deterministic embedding. We then combine this analysis with lower bounds on the offline optimum for Euclidean metrics, derived via majorization arguments, to obtain our guarantees.
Cite as

Yingxi Li, Ellen Vitercik, and Mingwei Yang. Smoothed Analysis of Online Metric Matching with a Single Sample: Beyond Metric Distortion. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 94:1-94:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{li_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.94,
  author =	{Li, Yingxi and Vitercik, Ellen and Yang, Mingwei},
  title =	{{Smoothed Analysis of Online Metric Matching with a Single Sample: Beyond Metric Distortion}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{94:1--94:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.94},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253815},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.94},
  annote =	{Keywords: Online algorithm, Metric matching, Competitive analysis, Smoothed analysis}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 79 Document/PDF
  • 56 Document/HTML
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 20 2026
  • 36 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 3 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 12 Roth, Aaron
  • 4 Jung, Christopher
  • 4 Kearns, Michael
  • 4 Manurangsi, Pasin
  • 3 Canonne, Clément L.
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 76 LIPIcs
  • 2 TGDK
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 13 Security and privacy
  • 10 Theory of computation → Machine learning theory
  • 10 Theory of computation → Theory of database privacy and security
  • 8 Security and privacy → Privacy-preserving protocols
  • 6 Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 14 Differential Privacy
  • 10 differential privacy
  • 5 Differential privacy
  • 5 algorithmic fairness
  • 3 Approximation Algorithms
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact