7 Search Results for "Vazou, Niki"

Document
Extended Abstract
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.4
Debugging a Smalltalk VM Assisted by Large Automated Reasoning (Extended Abstract)

Authors: Boris Shingarov and Jan Vraný

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)

Abstract
We show how a full-scale automated-reasoning engine implemented in Smalltalk can be applied to assist in the programmer’s cognitive task of traversing abstraction levels. This approach follows naturally from our definition of debugging as any activity aimed towards understanding a program. We introduce the notion of "dimensions of abstraction", give two examples ("stratum" and "mode"), and show how it is applied in debugging a native compiler backend.
Cite as

Boris Shingarov and Jan Vraný. Debugging a Smalltalk VM Assisted by Large Automated Reasoning (Extended Abstract). In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 4:1-4:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shingarov_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.4,
  author =	{Shingarov, Boris and Vran\'{y}, Jan},
  title =	{{Debugging a Smalltalk VM Assisted by Large Automated Reasoning}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:6},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242881},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Smalltalk, Virtual Machine, Automated Reasoning, Debugging, ISA Specification}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4
Distributive Laws of Monadic Containers

Authors: Chris Purdy and Stefania Damato

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 342, 11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025)

Abstract
Containers are used to carve out a class of strictly positive data types in terms of shapes and positions. They can be interpreted via a fully-faithful functor into endofunctors on Set. Monadic containers are those containers whose interpretation as a Set functor carries a monad structure. The category of containers is closed under container composition and is a monoidal category, whereas monadic containers do not in general compose. In this paper, we develop a characterisation of distributive laws of monadic containers. Distributive laws were introduced as a sufficient condition for the composition of the underlying functors of two monads to also carry a monad structure. Our development parallels Ahman and Uustalu’s characterisation of distributive laws of directed containers, i.e. containers whose Set functor interpretation carries a comonad structure. Furthermore, by combining our work with theirs, we construct characterisations of mixed distributive laws (i.e. of directed containers over monadic containers and vice versa), thereby completing the "zoo" of container characterisations of (co)monads and their distributive laws. We have found these characterisations amenable to development of existence and uniqueness proofs of distributive laws, particularly in the mechanised setting of Cubical Agda, in which most of the theory of this paper has been formalised.
Cite as

Chris Purdy and Stefania Damato. Distributive Laws of Monadic Containers. In 11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 342, pp. 4:1-4:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{purdy_et_al:LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4,
  author =	{Purdy, Chris and Damato, Stefania},
  title =	{{Distributive Laws of Monadic Containers}},
  booktitle =	{11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-383-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{342},
  editor =	{C\^{i}rstea, Corina and Knapp, Alexander},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235633},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: distributive laws, monadic containers, monads, dependent types, cubical agda}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.3
Pydrofoil: Accelerating Sail-Based Instruction Set Simulators

Authors: Carl Friedrich Bolz-Tereick, Luke Panayi, Ferdia McKeogh, Tom Spink, and Martin Berger

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
We present Pydrofoil, a multi-stage compiler that generates instruction set simulators (ISSs) from processor instruction set architectures (ISAs) expressed in the high-level, verification-oriented ISA specification language Sail. Pydrofoil achieves a > 230× speedup over the C-based ISS generated by Sail on our benchmarks, thanks to the following insights. (i) An ISS is effectively an interpreter loop, and tracing just-in-time (JIT) compilers have proven effective at accelerating those, albeit mostly for dynamically typed languages. (ii) ISS workloads are highly atypical, dominated by intensive bit manipulation operations. Conventional compiler optimisations for general-purpose programming languages have limited impact for speeding up such workloads. We develop suitable domain-specific optimisations. (iii) Neither tracing JIT compilers, nor ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation alone, even with domain-specific optimisations, suffice for the generation of performant ISSs. Pydrofoil therefore implements a hybrid approach, pairing an AOT compiler with a tracing JIT built on the meta-tracing PyPy framework. AOT and JIT use domain-specific optimisations. Our benchmarks demonstrate that combining AOT and JIT compilers provides significantly greater performance gains than using either compiler alone.
Cite as

Carl Friedrich Bolz-Tereick, Luke Panayi, Ferdia McKeogh, Tom Spink, and Martin Berger. Pydrofoil: Accelerating Sail-Based Instruction Set Simulators. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 3:1-3:31, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bolztereick_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.3,
  author =	{Bolz-Tereick, Carl Friedrich and Panayi, Luke and McKeogh, Ferdia and Spink, Tom and Berger, Martin},
  title =	{{Pydrofoil: Accelerating Sail-Based Instruction Set Simulators}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:31},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232962},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Instruction set architecture, processor, domain-specific language, just-in-time compilation, meta-tracing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32
Compositional Static Value Analysis for Higher-Order Numerical Programs

Authors: Milla Valnet, Raphaël Monat, and Antoine Miné

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Static analyzers have been successfully developed to detect runtime errors in many languages. However, the automatic analysis of functional languages remains a challenge due to their recursive functions, recursive algebraic data types, and higher-order functions. Classic type systems provide compositional methods that are in general not precise enough to prove the absence of runtime errors such as assertion failures. At the other end of the spectrum, deductive methods are more expressive but may require user guidance to prove invariants. Our work describes a static value analysis by abstract interpretation for a higher-order pure functional language. This analysis provides a sound and automatic approach to discover invariants and prevent assertion and match failures. We have designed a compositional analysis: functions are analyzed only once, at their definition site, generating a summary of their behavior. The summaries can be viewed as input-output relations expressed with relational abstract domains. We present two new abstract domains. A first abstract domain summarizes recursive algebraic data types. A second abstract domain lifts existing disjunctive relational summaries to higher-order by formalizing them as domains able to abstract higher-order functions. Both abstractions are parameterized by the abstractions of basic types (strings, integers, ...). Thanks to this parametric nature, both domains can be combined, allowing the analysis of higher-order functions manipulating algebraic data types and, conversely, algebraic data types using functions as first-class values. We have implemented this analysis in the open-source MOPSA platform. Preliminary evaluation confirms the precision of our approach on a set of 40 handwritten toy programs as well as 20 programs from the state-of-the-art Salto analyzer benchmark.
Cite as

Milla Valnet, Raphaël Monat, and Antoine Miné. Compositional Static Value Analysis for Higher-Order Numerical Programs. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 32:1-32:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{valnet_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32,
  author =	{Valnet, Milla and Monat, Rapha\"{e}l and Min\'{e}, Antoine},
  title =	{{Compositional Static Value Analysis for Higher-Order Numerical Programs}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233249},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Static Value Analysis, Functional Programming, Abstract Interpretation}
}
Document
Artifact
DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.8.2.12
REST: Integrating Term Rewriting with Program Verification (Artifact)

Authors: Zachary Grannan, Niki Vazou, Eva Darulova, and Alexander J. Summers

Published in: DARTS, Volume 8, Issue 2, Special Issue of the 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022)

Abstract
This artifact contains code for REST, a novel term rewriting technique for theorem proving that uses online termination checking and can be integrated with existing program verifiers. The artifact includes the REST library as well as a version of Liquid Haskell extended with REST. In addition, it includes the scripts that were used to generate the tables in the paper’s evaluation section. Also included is a docker image containing a development environment for REST (and the Liquid Haskell extension).
Cite as

Zachary Grannan, Niki Vazou, Eva Darulova, and Alexander J. Summers. REST: Integrating Term Rewriting with Program Verification (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 12:1-12:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{grannan_et_al:DARTS.8.2.12,
  author =	{Grannan, Zachary and Vazou, Niki and Darulova, Eva and Summers, Alexander J.},
  title =	{{REST: Integrating Term Rewriting with Program Verification (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{12:1--12:2},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{8},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Grannan, Zachary and Vazou, Niki and Darulova, Eva and Summers, Alexander J.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.8.2.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-162105},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.8.2.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: term rewriting, program verification, theorem proving}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.13
REST: Integrating Term Rewriting with Program Verification

Authors: Zachary Grannan, Niki Vazou, Eva Darulova, and Alexander J. Summers

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 222, 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022)

Abstract
We introduce REST, a novel term rewriting technique for theorem proving that uses online termination checking and can be integrated with existing program verifiers. REST enables flexible but terminating term rewriting for theorem proving by: (1) exploiting newly-introduced term orderings that are more permissive than standard rewrite simplification orderings; (2) dynamically and iteratively selecting orderings based on the path of rewrites taken so far; and (3) integrating external oracles that allow steps that cannot be justified with rewrite rules. Our REST approach is designed around an easily implementable core algorithm, parameterizable by choices of term orderings and their implementations; in this way our approach can be easily integrated into existing tools. We implemented REST as a Haskell library and incorporated it into Liquid Haskell’s evaluation strategy, extending Liquid Haskell with rewriting rules. We evaluated our REST implementation by comparing it against both existing rewriting techniques and E-matching (as used in most SMT solvers) and by showing that it can be used to supplant manual lemma application in many existing Liquid Haskell proofs.
Cite as

Zachary Grannan, Niki Vazou, Eva Darulova, and Alexander J. Summers. REST: Integrating Term Rewriting with Program Verification. In 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 222, pp. 13:1-13:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grannan_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.13,
  author =	{Grannan, Zachary and Vazou, Niki and Darulova, Eva and Summers, Alexander J.},
  title =	{{REST: Integrating Term Rewriting with Program Verification}},
  booktitle =	{36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-225-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{222},
  editor =	{Ali, Karim and Vitek, Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-162416},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: term rewriting, program verification, theorem proving}
}
Document
SCICO Journal-first
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.33
Abstracting Gradual References (SCICO Journal-first)

Authors: Matías Toro and Éric Tanter

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 166, 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)

Abstract
Gradual typing is an effective approach to integrate static and dynamic typing, which supports the smooth transition between both extremes via the (programmer-controlled) precision of type annotations [Jeremy Siek and Walid Taha, 2006; Siek et al., 2015]. Imprecision is normally introduced via the unknown type ?, e.g. function type Int → Bool is more precise than ? → ?, and both more precise than ?. Gradual typing relates types of different precision using consistent type relations, such as type consistency (resp. consistent subtyping), the gradual counterpart of type equality (resp. subtyping). For instance, ? → Int is consistent with Bool → ?. This approach has been applied in a number of settings, such as objects [Jeremy Siek and Walid Taha, 2007], subtyping [Jeremy Siek and Walid Taha, 2007; Ronald Garcia et al., 2016], effects [Bañados Schwerter et al., 2014; Bañados Schwerter et al., 2016], ownership [Ilya Sergey and Dave Clarke, 2012], typestates [Roger Wolff et al., 2011; Ronald Garcia et al., 2014], information-flow typing [Tim Disney and Cormac Flanagan, 2011; Luminous Fennell and Peter Thiemann, 2013; Matías Toro et al., 2018], session types [Igarashi et al., 2017], refinements [Nico Lehmann and {É}ric Tanter, 2017], set-theoretic types [Castagna and Lanvin, 2017], Hoare logic [Johannes Bader et al., 2018], parametric polymorphism [Amal Ahmed et al., 2011; Ahmed et al., 2017; Ina and Igarashi, 2011; Igarashi et al., 2017; Ningning Xie et al., 2018; Matías Toro et al., 2019], and references [Jeremy Siek and Walid Taha, 2006; Herman et al., 2010; Siek et al., 2015]. In particular, gradual typing for mutable references has seen the elaboration of various possible semantics: invariant references [Jeremy Siek and Walid Taha, 2006], guarded references [Herman et al., 2010], monotonic references [Siek et al., 2015], and permissive references [Siek et al., 2015]. Invariant references are a form of references where reference types are invariant with respect to type consistency. Guarded references admit variance thanks to systematic runtime checks on reference reads and writes; the runtime type of an allocated cell never changes during execution. Guarded references have been formulated in a space-efficient coercion calculus, which ensures that gradual programs do not accumulate unbounded pending checks during execution. Hereafter, we refer to this language as HCC. Monotonic references favor efficiency over flexibility by only allowing reference cells to vary towards more precise types. This allows reference operations in statically-typed regions to safely proceed without any runtime checks. Permissive references are the most flexible approach, in which reference cells can be initialized and updated to any value of any type at any time. These four developments reflect different design decisions with respect to gradual references: is the reference type constructor variant under consistency? Can the programmer specify a precise bound on the static type of a reference, and hence on the corresponding heap cell type? Can the heap cell type evolve its precision at runtime, and if yes, how? There is obviously no absolute answer to these questions, as they reflect different tradeoffs such as in efficiency and precision. This work explores the semantics that results from the application of a systematic methodology to gradualize static type systems. Currently we can find in the literature two methodologies to gradualize statically-typed languages: Abstracting Gradual Typing (AGT) [Ronald Garcia et al., 2016], and the Gradualizer [Matteo Cimini and Jeremy Siek, 2016]. In this work, we consider the AGT methodology as it naturally scales to auxiliary structures such as a mutable heap. The AGT methodology helps to systematically construct gradually-typed languages by using abstract interpretation [Cousot and Cousot, 1977] at the type level. In brief, AGT interprets gradual types as an abstraction of sets of possible static types, formally captured through a Galois connection. The static semantics of a gradual language are then derived by lifting the semantics of a statically-typed language through this connection, and the dynamic semantics follow by Curry-Howard from proof normalization of the type safety argument. The AGT methodology has been shown to be effective in many contexts: records and subtyping [Ronald Garcia et al., 2016], type-and-effects [Bañados Schwerter et al., 2014; Bañados Schwerter et al., 2016], refinement types [Nico Lehmann and Éric Tanter, 2017; Niki Vazou et al., 2018], set-theoretic and union types [Castagna and Lanvin, 2017; Matías Toro and Éric Tanter, 2017], information-flow typing [Matías Toro et al., 2018], and parametric polymorphism [Matías Toro et al., 2019]. However, this methodology has never been applied to mutable references in isolation. Although Toro et al. [Matías Toro et al., 2018] apply AGT to a language with references, they only gradualize security levels of types (e.g. Ref Int_?), not whole types (e.g. Ref ? is not supported). In this article we answer the following open questions: Which semantics for gradually-type references follows by systematically applying AGT? Does AGT justify one of the existing approaches, or does it suggest yet another design? Can we recover other semantics for gradual references, if yes, how? This article first reviews the different existing gradual approaches to mutable references through examples. It then presents the semantics for gradual references that is obtained by applying AGT, and how to accommodate the other semantics. More specifically, this work makes the following contributions: - We present λ_REF~, a gradual language with support for mutable references. We derive λ_REF~ by applying the AGT methodology to a fully-static simple language with mutable references called λ_REF. This is the first application of AGT that focuses on gradually-typed mutable references. - We prove that λ_REF~ satisfies the gradual guarantee of Siek et al. [Siek et al., 2015]. We also present the first formal statement and proof of the conservative extension of the dynamic semantics of the static language [Siek et al., 2015], for a gradual language derived using AGT. - We prove that the derived language, λ_REF~, corresponds to the semantics of guarded references from HCC. Formally, given a λ_REF~ term and its compilation to HCC^+ (an adapted version of HCC extended with conditionals and binary operations) we prove that both terms are bisimilar, and that consequently they either both terminate, both fail, or both diverge. - We observe that λ_REF~ and HCC^+ differ in the order of combination of runtime checks. As a result, HCC is space efficient whereas λ_REF~ is not: we can write programs in λ_REF~ that may accumulate an unbounded number of checks. We formalize the changes needed in the dynamic semantics of λ_REF~ to achieve space efficiency. This technique to recover space efficiency is in fact independent from mutable references, and is therefore applicable to other gradual languages derived with AGT. - We formally describe how to support other gradual reference semantics in λ_REF~ by presenting λ_REF~^𝗉𝗆, an extension that additionally supports both permissive and monotonic references. Finally, we prove for the first time that monotonic references satisfy the dynamic gradual guarantee, a non-trivial result that requires careful consideration of updates to the store. Additionally, we implemented λ_REF~ as an interactive prototype that displays both typing derivations and reduction traces. All the examples mentioned in this paper are readily available in the online prototype available at https://pleiad.cl/grefs. As a result, this paper sheds further light on the design space of gradual languages with mutable references and contributes to deepening the understanding of the AGT methodology.
Cite as

Matías Toro and Éric Tanter. Abstracting Gradual References (SCICO Journal-first). In 34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 166, pp. 33:1-33:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{toro_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.33,
  author =	{Toro, Mat{\'\i}as and Tanter, \'{E}ric},
  title =	{{Abstracting Gradual References}},
  booktitle =	{34th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2020)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-154-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{166},
  editor =	{Hirschfeld, Robert and Pape, Tobias},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-131900},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2020.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Gradual Typing, Mutable References, Abstract interpretation}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 7 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2025
  • 2 2022
  • 1 2020

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Darulova, Eva
  • 2 Grannan, Zachary
  • 2 Summers, Alexander J.
  • 2 Vazou, Niki
  • 1 Berger, Martin
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 5 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 1 DARTS

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Runtime environments
  • 2 Theory of computation → Program verification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Type structures
  • 1 Hardware → Simulation and emulation
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Automated static analysis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 program verification
  • 2 term rewriting
  • 2 theorem proving
  • 1 Abstract Interpretation
  • 1 Abstract interpretation
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact