5 Search Results for "Yu, Jiangshan"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7
Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World

Authors: Bo Pan and Maria Potop-Butucaru

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we address the Byzantine Agreement problem in synchronous systems where Byzantine agents can move from process to process, corrupting their host. We focus on two representative models: Garay’s and Buhrman’s models. In Garay’s model, when a process has been left by the Byzantine agent, it enters a cured state, is aware of its condition, and can remain silent for a round to prevent the dissemination of incorrect information. In Buhrman’s model, a Byzantine agent moves together with the message. It has been shown that solving Byzantine Agreement requires at least 4t + 1 processes in Garay’s model, and at least 3t + 1 in Buhrman’s model. In this paper, we aim to increase the tolerance to mobile Byzantine agents by integrating a trusted counter abstraction into both models. This abstraction prevents nodes from equivocating. In the new models, we prove that at least 3t+1, respectively 2t+1 processors are needed to tolerate t mobile Byzantine agents. Furthermore, we propose novel Mobile Byzantine Agreement algorithms that match these new lower bounds for both Garay’s and Buhrman’s models, achieving agreement in 𝒪(n) synchronous rounds.
Cite as

Bo Pan and Maria Potop-Butucaru. Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 7:1-7:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7,
  author =	{Pan, Bo and Potop-Butucaru, Maria},
  title =	{{Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251809},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Byzantine Agreement, Mobile Faults, Trusted Abstractions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.32
4-Swap: Achieving Grief-Free and Bribery-Safe Atomic Swaps Using Four Transactions

Authors: Kirti Singh, Vinay J. Ribeiro, and Susmita Mandal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
Cross-chain asset exchange is crucial for blockchain interoperability. Existing solutions rely on trusted third parties and risk asset loss, or use decentralized alternatives like atomic swaps, which suffer from grief attacks. Griefing occurs when a party prematurely exits, locking the counterparty’s assets until a timelock expires. Hedged Atomic Swaps mitigate griefing by introducing a penalty premium; however, they increase the number of transactions from four (as in Tier Nolan’s swap) to six, which in turn introduces new griefing risks. Grief-Free (GF) Swap reduces this to five transactions by consolidating assets and premiums on a single chain. However, no existing protocol achieves grief-free asset exchange in just four transactions. This paper presents 4-Swap, the first cross-chain atomic swap protocol that is both grief-free and bribery-safe, while completing asset exchange in just four transactions. By combining the griefing premium and principal into a single transaction per chain, 4-Swap reduces on-chain transactions, leading to faster execution compared to previous grief-free solutions. It is fully compatible with Bitcoin and operates without the need for any new opcodes. A game-theoretic analysis shows that rational participants have no incentive to deviate from the protocol, ensuring robust compliance and security.
Cite as

Kirti Singh, Vinay J. Ribeiro, and Susmita Mandal. 4-Swap: Achieving Grief-Free and Bribery-Safe Atomic Swaps Using Four Transactions. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 32:1-32:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{singh_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.32,
  author =	{Singh, Kirti and Ribeiro, Vinay J. and Mandal, Susmita},
  title =	{{4-Swap: Achieving Grief-Free and Bribery-Safe Atomic Swaps Using Four Transactions}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247514},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Atomic Swaps, Griefing, Bribery, HTLC}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20
How Robust Are Synchronous Consensus Protocols?

Authors: Nenad Milošević, Daniel Cason, Zarko Milošević, and Fernando Pedone

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
Synchronous Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocols have long been a reality in an academic setting, yet their practicality remains debated. The main concern of skeptics of synchronous systems is that the correctness of these protocols depends on the timely delivery of all messages within a predefined synchronous bound, Δ. This dependency creates a challenging tradeoff between protocol correctness and performance, as Δ directly impacts both. In this paper, we examine this tradeoff in detail. Specifically, we introduce BoundBFT, a new synchronous BFT consensus protocol. We analyze how BoundBFT’s correctness can be compromised and use this analysis to design and implement the most effective attack strategies that malicious processes could employ. Furthermore, we experimentally determine the synchronous bound Δ that provides sufficient confidence in maintaining protocol correctness even in the presence of malicious replicas. Finally, we apply this discovered bound to BoundBFT, evaluate its performance, and compare it to state-of-the-art synchronous and partially synchronous protocols.
Cite as

Nenad Milošević, Daniel Cason, Zarko Milošević, and Fernando Pedone. How Robust Are Synchronous Consensus Protocols?. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 20:1-20:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{milosevic_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20,
  author =	{Milo\v{s}evi\'{c}, Nenad and Cason, Daniel and Milo\v{s}evi\'{c}, Zarko and Pedone, Fernando},
  title =	{{How Robust Are Synchronous Consensus Protocols?}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225560},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Synchronous Consensus, Byzantine Failures, Blockchain}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25
Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models

Authors: Rowdy Chotkan, Bart Cox, Vincent Rahli, and Jérémie Decouchant

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
Reliable communication is a fundamental distributed communication abstraction that allows any two nodes within a network to communicate with each other. It is necessary for more powerful communication primitives, such as broadcast and consensus. Using different authentication models, two classical protocols implement reliable communication in unknown and sufficiently connected networks. In the former, network links are authenticated, and processes rely on dissemination paths to authenticate messages. In the latter, processes generate digital signatures that are flooded throughout the network. This work considers the hybrid system model that combines authenticated links and authenticated processes. Additionally, we aim to leverage the possible presence of trusted nodes (e.g., network gateways) and trusted components (e.g., Intel SGX enclaves). We first extend the two classical reliable communication protocols to leverage trusted nodes. Then we propose DualRC, our most generic algorithm that considers the hybrid authentication model by manipulating dissemination paths and digital signatures, and leverages the possible presence of trusted nodes and trusted components. We describe and prove methods that establish whether our algorithms implement reliable communication on a given network.
Cite as

Rowdy Chotkan, Bart Cox, Vincent Rahli, and Jérémie Decouchant. Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 25:1-25:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chotkan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25,
  author =	{Chotkan, Rowdy and Cox, Bart and Rahli, Vincent and Decouchant, J\'{e}r\'{e}mie},
  title =	{{Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225611},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reliable communication, Byzantine, Authentication models, Trust}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2021.2
General Congestion Attack on HTLC-Based Payment Channel Networks

Authors: Zhichun Lu, Runchao Han, and Jiangshan Yu

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 97, 3rd International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols (Tokenomics 2021)

Abstract
Payment Channel Networks (PCNs) have been a promising approach to scale blockchains. However, PCNs have limited liquidity: large-amount or multi-hop payments may fail. The major threat of PCNs liquidity is payment griefing, where the adversary who acts as the payee keeps withholding the payment, so that coins involved in the payment cannot be used for routing other payments before the payment expires. Payment griefing gives adversaries a chance to launch the congestion attack, where the adversary griefs a large number of payments and paralyses the entire PCN. Understanding congestion attacks, including their strategies and impact, is crucial for designing PCNs with better liquidity guarantees. However, existing research has only focused on the specific attacking strategies and specific aspects of their impact on PCNs. We fill this gap by studying the general congestion attack. Compared to existing attack strategies, in our framework each step serves an orthogonal purpose and is customisable, allowing the adversary to focus on different aspects of the liquidity. To evaluate the attack’s impact, we propose a generic method of quantifying PCNs' liquidity and effectiveness of the congestion attacks. We evaluate our general congestion attacks on Bitcoin’s Lightning Network, and show that with direct channels to 1.5% richest nodes, and ∼ 0.0096 BTC of cost, the adversary can launch a congestion attack that locks 47% (∼280 BTC) coins in the network; reduces success rate of payments by 16.0%∼60.0%; increases fee of payments by 4.5%∼16.0%; increases average attempts of payments by 42.0%∼115.3%; and increase the number of bankruptcy nodes (i.e., nodes with insufficient balance for making normal-size payments) by 26.6%∼109.4%, where the amounts of payments range from 0.001 to 0.019 BTC.
Cite as

Zhichun Lu, Runchao Han, and Jiangshan Yu. General Congestion Attack on HTLC-Based Payment Channel Networks. In 3rd International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols (Tokenomics 2021). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 97, pp. 2:1-2:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lu_et_al:OASIcs.Tokenomics.2021.2,
  author =	{Lu, Zhichun and Han, Runchao and Yu, Jiangshan},
  title =	{{General Congestion Attack on HTLC-Based Payment Channel Networks}},
  booktitle =	{3rd International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols (Tokenomics 2021)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-220-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{97},
  editor =	{Gramoli, Vincent and Halaburda, Hanna and Pass, Rafael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2021.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-158990},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2021.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Blockchain, PCN, Congestion}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 5 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 3 2025
  • 1 2022

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Cason, Daniel
  • 1 Chotkan, Rowdy
  • 1 Cox, Bart
  • 1 Decouchant, Jérémie
  • 1 Han, Runchao
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Availability
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Fault-tolerant network topologies
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Redundancy
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Reliability
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Blockchain
  • 1 Atomic Swaps
  • 1 Authentication models
  • 1 Bribery
  • 1 Byzantine
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact