4 Search Results for "Zimmermann, Alfred"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20
Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics

Authors: Marek Chalupa, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Ana Oliveira da Costa

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
Hypertrace logic is a sorted first-order logic with separate sorts for time and execution traces. Its formulas specify hyperproperties, which are properties relating multiple traces. In this work, we extend hypertrace logic by introducing trace quantifiers that range over the set of all possible traces. In this extended logic, formulas can quantify over two kinds of trace variables: constrained trace variables, which range over a fixed set of traces defined by the model, and unconstrained trace variables, which can be assigned to any trace. In comparison, hyperlogics such as HyperLTL have only constrained trace quantifiers. We use hypertrace logic to study how different quantifier patterns affect the decidability of the satisfiability problem. We prove that hypertrace logic without constrained trace quantifiers is equivalent to monadic second-order logic of one successor (S1S), and therefore satisfiable, and that the trace-prefixed fragment (all trace quantifiers precede all time quantifiers) is equivalent to HyperQPTL. Moreover, we show that all hypertrace formulas where the only alternation between constrained trace quantifiers is from an existential to a universal quantifier are equisatisfiable to formulas without constraints on their trace variables and, therefore, decidable as well. Our framework allows us to study also time-prefixed hyperlogics, for which we provide new decidability and undecidability results.
Cite as

Marek Chalupa, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Ana Oliveira da Costa. Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 20:1-20:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chalupa_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20,
  author =	{Chalupa, Marek and Henzinger, Thomas A. and Oliveira da Costa, Ana},
  title =	{{Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251016},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hyperproperties, Satisfiability, First-order Logic, S1S}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.32
Resolving Nondeterminism by Chance

Authors: Soumyajit Paul, David Purser, Sven Schewe, Qiyi Tang, Patrick Totzke, and Di-De Yen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
History-deterministic automata are those in which nondeterministic choices can be correctly resolved stepwise: there is a strategy to select a continuation of a run given the next input letter so that if the overall input word admits some accepting run, then the constructed run is also accepting. Motivated by checking qualitative properties in probabilistic verification, we consider the setting where the resolver strategy can randomise and only needs to succeed with lower-bounded probability. We study the expressiveness of such stochastically-resolvable automata as well as consider the decision questions of whether a given automaton has this property. In particular, we show that it is undecidable to check if a given NFA is λ-stochastically resolvable. This problem is decidable for finitely-ambiguous automata. We also present complexity upper and lower bounds for several well-studied classes of automata for which this problem remains decidable.
Cite as

Soumyajit Paul, David Purser, Sven Schewe, Qiyi Tang, Patrick Totzke, and Di-De Yen. Resolving Nondeterminism by Chance. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 32:1-32:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{paul_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.32,
  author =	{Paul, Soumyajit and Purser, David and Schewe, Sven and Tang, Qiyi and Totzke, Patrick and Yen, Di-De},
  title =	{{Resolving Nondeterminism by Chance}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239822},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: History-determinism, finite automata, probabilistic automata}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19
Time for Timed Monitorability

Authors: Thomas M. Grosen, Sean Kauffman, Kim G. Larsen, and Martin Zimmermann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
Monitoring is an important part of the verification toolbox, in particular in situations where exhaustive verification using, e.g., model-checking is infeasible. The goal of online monitoring is to determine the satisfaction or violation of a specification during runtime, i.e., based on finite execution prefixes. However, not every specification is amenable to monitoring, e.g., properties for which no finite execution can witness satisfaction or violation. Monitorability is the question of whether a given specification is amenable to monitoring, and has been extensively studied in discrete time. Here, we study the monitorability problem for real-time properties expressed as Timed Automata. For specifications given by deterministic Timed Muller Automata, we prove decidability while we show that the problem is undecidable for specifications given by nondeterministic Timed Büchi automata. Furthermore, we refine monitorability to also determine bounds on the number of events as well as the time that must pass before monitoring the property may yield an informative verdict. We prove that for deterministic Timed Muller automata, such bounds can be effectively computed. In contrast we show that for nondeterministic Timed Büchi automata such bounds are not computable.
Cite as

Thomas M. Grosen, Sean Kauffman, Kim G. Larsen, and Martin Zimmermann. Time for Timed Monitorability. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 19:1-19:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grosen_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19,
  author =	{Grosen, Thomas M. and Kauffman, Sean and Larsen, Kim G. and Zimmermann, Martin},
  title =	{{Time for Timed Monitorability}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239690},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Monitorability, Monitoring, Timed Automata, MITL}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Microservices.2017-2019.3
Exploring Maintainability Assurance Research for Service- and Microservice-Based Systems: Directions and Differences

Authors: Justus Bogner, Adrian Weller, Stefan Wagner, and Alfred Zimmermann

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 78, Joint Post-proceedings of the First and Second International Conference on Microservices (Microservices 2017/2019)

Abstract
To ensure sustainable software maintenance and evolution, a diverse set of activities and concepts like metrics, change impact analysis, or antipattern detection can be used. Special maintainability assurance techniques have been proposed for service- and microservice-based systems, but it is difficult to get a comprehensive overview of this publication landscape. We therefore conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to collect and categorize maintainability assurance approaches for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and microservices. Our search strategy led to the selection of 223 primary studies from 2007 to 2018 which we categorized with a threefold taxonomy: a) architectural (SOA, microservices, both), b) methodical (method or contribution of the study), and c) thematic (maintainability assurance subfield). We discuss the distribution among these categories and present different research directions as well as exemplary studies per thematic category. The primary finding of our SLR is that, while very few approaches have been suggested for microservices so far (24 of 223, ∼11%), we identified several thematic categories where existing SOA techniques could be adapted for the maintainability assurance of microservices.
Cite as

Justus Bogner, Adrian Weller, Stefan Wagner, and Alfred Zimmermann. Exploring Maintainability Assurance Research for Service- and Microservice-Based Systems: Directions and Differences. In Joint Post-proceedings of the First and Second International Conference on Microservices (Microservices 2017/2019). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 78, pp. 3:1-3:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bogner_et_al:OASIcs.Microservices.2017-2019.3,
  author =	{Bogner, Justus and Weller, Adrian and Wagner, Stefan and Zimmermann, Alfred},
  title =	{{Exploring Maintainability Assurance Research for Service- and Microservice-Based Systems: Directions and Differences}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Post-proceedings of the First and Second International Conference on Microservices (Microservices 2017/2019)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:22},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-137-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{78},
  editor =	{Cruz-Filipe, Lu{\'\i}s and Giallorenzo, Saverio and Montesi, Fabrizio and Peressotti, Marco and Rademacher, Florian and Sachweh, Sabine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Microservices.2017-2019.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-118255},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Microservices.2017-2019.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maintainability, Software Evolution, Quality Assurance, Service-Based Systems, SOA, Microservices, Systematic Literature Review}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 4 Document/PDF
  • 3 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2025
  • 1 2020

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Bogner, Justus
  • 1 Chalupa, Marek
  • 1 Grosen, Thomas M.
  • 1 Henzinger, Thomas A.
  • 1 Kauffman, Sean
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 3 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 1 Information systems → Web services
  • 1 Social and professional topics → Quality assurance
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Maintaining software
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Software evolution
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 First-order Logic
  • 1 History-determinism
  • 1 Hyperproperties
  • 1 MITL
  • 1 Maintainability
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact