6 Search Results for "Scherer, Gabriel"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20
On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing

Authors: Federico Lochbaum and Guillermo Polito

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)

Abstract
Guaranteeing that a compiler behaves correctly is a complex task often approached through test generation and fuzzing. Compiler test generation must not only ensure that a compiler generates code that does not break, but also that it implements the programming language semantics. Recently, interpreter-guided test generation has been proposed to test JIT compilers: Concolic-execution on the interpreter yields test cases for the language semantics which are then validated between differential testing of the interpreter and compiler. In previous work, this solution has been shown to find interpreter/compiler differences. However, little has been said about the effectiveness and the solution limits. In this paper we study the behavior of this technique, to shed light on future improvements and research. We experiment with this technique on the JIT compiler for the Pharo programming language, on two different backends: ARMv7 and x86. We explore how effective the solution is in terms of compiler coverage and its limitations, and we discuss how future research can overcome them. Moreover, we investigate how this technique combined with random constraint mutations increases backend compiler coverage.
Cite as

Federico Lochbaum and Guillermo Polito. On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing. In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 20:1-20:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lochbaum_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.20,
  author =	{Lochbaum, Federico and Polito, Guillermo},
  title =	{{On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243040},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Virtual Machines, Concolic Testing, JIT compilers, interpreters, Differential Testing, Constraint Mutations, Compiler Coverage}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.113
Nearly Optimal Circuit Size for Sparse Quantum State Preparation

Authors: Lvzhou Li and Jingquan Luo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
Quantum state preparation is a fundamental and significant subroutine in quantum computing. In this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation of the circuit size (the total count of elementary gates in the circuit) for sparse quantum state preparation. A quantum state is said to be d-sparse if it has only d non-zero amplitudes. For the task of preparing an n-qubit d-sparse quantum state, we obtain the following results: - Without ancillary qubits: Any n-qubit d-sparse quantum state can be prepared by a quantum circuit of size O(nd/(log n) + n) without using ancillary qubits, which improves the previous best results. It is asymptotically optimal when d = poly(n), and this optimality holds for a broader scope under some reasonable assumptions. - With limited ancillary qubits: (i) Based on the first result, we prove for the first time a trade-off between the number of ancillary qubits and the circuit size: any n-qubit d-sparse quantum state can be prepared by a quantum circuit of size O((nd)/(log(n + m)) + n) using m ancillary qubits for any m ∈ O((nd)/(log nd) + n). (ii) We establish a matching lower bound Ω((nd)/(log(n+m))+n) under some reasonable assumptions, and obtain a slightly weaker lower bound Ω((nd)/(log(n+m)+log d) + n) without any assumptions. - With unlimited ancillary qubits: Given an arbitrary amount of ancillary qubits available, the circuit size for preparing n-qubit d-sparse quantum states is Θ((nd)/(log nd) + n).
Cite as

Lvzhou Li and Jingquan Luo. Nearly Optimal Circuit Size for Sparse Quantum State Preparation. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 113:1-113:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{li_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.113,
  author =	{Li, Lvzhou and Luo, Jingquan},
  title =	{{Nearly Optimal Circuit Size for Sparse Quantum State Preparation}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{113:1--113:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.113},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234900},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.113},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum computing, quantum state preparation, circuit complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.44
Type Tailoring

Authors: Ashton Wiersdorf, Stephen Chang, Matthias Felleisen, and Ben Greenman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 313, 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)

Abstract
Type systems evolve too slowly to keep up with the quick evolution of libraries - especially libraries that introduce abstractions. Type tailoring offers a lightweight solution by equipping the core language with an API for modifying the elaboration of surface code into the internal language of the typechecker. Through user-programmable elaboration, tailoring rules appear to improve the precision and expressiveness of the underlying type system. Furthermore, type tailoring cooperates with the host type system by expanding to code that the host then typechecks. In the context of a hygienic metaprogramming system, tailoring rules can even harmoniously compose with one another. Type tailoring has emerged as a theme across several languages and metaprogramming systems, but never with direct support and rarely in the same shape twice. For example, both OCaml and Typed Racket enable forms of tailoring, but in quite different ways. This paper identifies key dimensions of type tailoring systems and tradeoffs along each dimension. It demonstrates the usefulness of tailoring with examples that cover sized vectors, database queries, and optional types. Finally, it outlines a vision for future research at the intersection of types and metaprogramming.
Cite as

Ashton Wiersdorf, Stephen Chang, Matthias Felleisen, and Ben Greenman. Type Tailoring. In 38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 313, pp. 44:1-44:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{wiersdorf_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.44,
  author =	{Wiersdorf, Ashton and Chang, Stephen and Felleisen, Matthias and Greenman, Ben},
  title =	{{Type Tailoring}},
  booktitle =	{38th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2024)},
  pages =	{44:1--44:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-341-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{313},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Salvaneschi, Guido},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.44},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-208933},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2024.44},
  annote =	{Keywords: Types, Metaprogramming, Macros, Partial Evaluation}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.1
A Fresh Look at the lambda-Calculus (Invited Talk)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 131, 4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019)

Abstract
The (untyped) lambda-calculus is almost 90 years old. And yet - we argue here - its study is far from being over. The paper is a bird’s eye view of the questions the author worked on in the last few years: how to measure the complexity of lambda-terms, how to decompose their evaluation, how to implement it, and how all this varies according to the evaluation strategy. The paper aims at inducing a new way of looking at an old topic, focussing on high-level issues and perspectives.
Cite as

Beniamino Accattoli. A Fresh Look at the lambda-Calculus (Invited Talk). In 4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 131, pp. 1:1-1:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{accattoli:LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.1,
  author =	{Accattoli, Beniamino},
  title =	{{A Fresh Look at the lambda-Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-107-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{131},
  editor =	{Geuvers, Herman},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-105083},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, sharing, abstract machines, type systems, rewriting}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.15
Search for Program Structure

Authors: Gabriel Scherer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 71, 2nd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2017)

Abstract
The community of programming language research loves the Curry-Howard correspondence between proofs and programs. Cut-elimination as computation, theorems for free, 'call/cc' as excluded middle, dependently typed languages as proof assistants, etc. Yet we have, for all these years, missed an obvious observation: "the structure of programs corresponds to the structure of proof search". For pure programs and intuitionistic logic, more is known about the latter than the former. We think we know what programs are, but logicians know better! To motivate the study of proof search for program structure, we retrace recent research on applying focusing to study the canonical structure of simply-typed lambda-terms. We then motivate the open problem of extending canonical forms to support richer type systems, such as polymorphism, by discussing a few enticing applications of more canonical program representations.
Cite as

Gabriel Scherer. Search for Program Structure. In 2nd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 71, pp. 15:1-15:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{scherer:LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.15,
  author =	{Scherer, Gabriel},
  title =	{{Search for Program Structure}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2017)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-032-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{71},
  editor =	{Lerner, Benjamin S. and Bod{\'\i}k, Rastislav and Krishnamurthi, Shriram},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-71346},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: programs, proofs, focusing, canonicity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.317
Multi-Focusing on Extensional Rewriting with Sums

Authors: Gabriel Scherer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 38, 13th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA 2015)

Abstract
We propose a logical justification for the rewriting-based equivalence procedure for simply-typed lambda-terms with sums of Lindley. It relies on maximally multi-focused proofs, a notion of canonical derivations introduced for linear logic. Lindley’s rewriting closely corresponds to preemptive rewriting, a technical device used in the meta-theory of maximal multi-focus.
Cite as

Gabriel Scherer. Multi-Focusing on Extensional Rewriting with Sums. In 13th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 38, pp. 317-331, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{scherer:LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.317,
  author =	{Scherer, Gabriel},
  title =	{{Multi-Focusing on Extensional Rewriting with Sums}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA 2015)},
  pages =	{317--331},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-87-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{38},
  editor =	{Altenkirch, Thorsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.317},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-51721},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.317},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maximal multi-focusing, extensional sums, rewriting, natural deduction}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 6 Document/PDF
  • 2 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2019
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2015

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Scherer, Gabriel
  • 1 Accattoli, Beniamino
  • 1 Chang, Stephen
  • 1 Felleisen, Matthias
  • 1 Greenman, Ben
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 5 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Compilers
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Extensible languages
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Functional languages
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging
  • 1 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 rewriting
  • 1 Compiler Coverage
  • 1 Concolic Testing
  • 1 Constraint Mutations
  • 1 Differential Testing
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact