10 Search Results for "Wang, Yanlin"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2026.8
Detecting Cross-Function Reentrancy from EVM Traces

Authors: Semia Guesmi, Carla Piazza, Andrea Gasparetto, Matteo Rizzo, and Sabina Rossi

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 142, 7th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2026)

Abstract
Reentrancy remains one of the most critical vulnerabilities affecting Ethereum smart contracts. While many existing analysis tools focus on detecting classical single-function reentrancy, more complex forms such as cross-function reentrancy are harder to identify because they depend on execution semantics and interactions between multiple functions. In this work, we study reentrancy at the level of Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) execution traces. We extend the TxSpector framework with new Datalog-based detection rules designed to capture cross-function reentrancy patterns. To support this analysis, we also modernize the trace extraction component by adapting it to recent versions of the Ethereum client and updated EVM instructions. The proposed approach is evaluated on real Ethereum on-chain transaction traces. The results show that our method is able to detect cross-function reentrancy behaviors that are not captured by the original TxSpector rules, demonstrating the effectiveness of pattern-based logic detection at the EVM execution level.
Cite as

Semia Guesmi, Carla Piazza, Andrea Gasparetto, Matteo Rizzo, and Sabina Rossi. Detecting Cross-Function Reentrancy from EVM Traces. In 7th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2026). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 142, pp. 8:1-8:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{guesmi_et_al:OASIcs.FMBC.2026.8,
  author =	{Guesmi, Semia and Piazza, Carla and Gasparetto, Andrea and Rizzo, Matteo and Rossi, Sabina},
  title =	{{Detecting Cross-Function Reentrancy from EVM Traces}},
  booktitle =	{7th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2026)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-424-6},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{142},
  editor =	{Bartoletti, Massimo and Marmsoler, Diego},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2026.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-257058},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2026.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Blockchain, smart contract, Reentrancy detection, EVM, design Patterns, logic rules}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.61
Random Unitaries in Constant (Quantum) Time

Authors: Ben Foxman, Natalie Parham, Francisca Vasconcelos, and Henry Yuen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Random unitaries are a central object of study in quantum information, with applications to quantum computation, quantum many-body physics, and quantum cryptography. Recent work has constructed unitary designs and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) using Θ(log log n)-depth unitary circuits with two-qubit gates. In this work, we show that unitary designs and PRUs can be efficiently constructed in several well-studied models of constant-time quantum computation (i.e., the time complexity on the quantum computer is independent of the system size). These models are constant-depth circuits augmented with certain nonlocal operations, such as (a) many-qubit TOFFOLI gates, (b) many-qubit FANOUT gates, or (c) mid-circuit measurements with classical feedforward control. Recent advances in quantum computing hardware suggest experimental feasibility of these models in the near future. Our results demonstrate that unitary designs and PRUs can be constructed in much weaker circuit models than previously thought. Furthermore, our construction of PRUs in constant-depth with many-qubit TOFFOLI gates shows that, under cryptographic assumptions, there is no polynomial-time learning algorithm for the circuit class QAC⁰. Finally, our results suggest a new approach towards proving that PARITY is not computable in QAC⁰, a long-standing question in quantum complexity theory.
Cite as

Ben Foxman, Natalie Parham, Francisca Vasconcelos, and Henry Yuen. Random Unitaries in Constant (Quantum) Time. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 61:1-61:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{foxman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.61,
  author =	{Foxman, Ben and Parham, Natalie and Vasconcelos, Francisca and Yuen, Henry},
  title =	{{Random Unitaries in Constant (Quantum) Time}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{61:1--61:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.61},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253481},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.61},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum Information, Pseudorandomness, Circuit Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.51
Quantum Approximate k-Minimum Finding

Authors: Minbo Gao, Zhengfeng Ji, and Qisheng Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
Quantum k-minimum finding is a fundamental subroutine with numerous applications in combinatorial problems and machine learning. Previous approaches typically assume oracle access to exact function values, making it challenging to integrate this subroutine with other quantum algorithms. In this paper, we propose an (almost) optimal quantum k-minimum finding algorithm that works with approximate values for all k ≥ 1, extending a result of van Apeldoorn, Gilyén, Gribling, and de Wolf (FOCS 2017) for k = 1. As practical applications, we present efficient quantum algorithms for identifying the k smallest expectation values among multiple observables and for determining the k lowest ground state energies of a Hamiltonian with a known eigenbasis.
Cite as

Minbo Gao, Zhengfeng Ji, and Qisheng Wang. Quantum Approximate k-Minimum Finding. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 51:1-51:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gao_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.51,
  author =	{Gao, Minbo and Ji, Zhengfeng and Wang, Qisheng},
  title =	{{Quantum Approximate k-Minimum Finding}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{51:1--51:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.51},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245192},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.51},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum Computing, Quantum Algorithms, Quantum Minimum Finding}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6
QSETH Strikes Again: Finer Quantum Lower Bounds for Lattice Problem, Strong Simulation, Hitting Set Problem, and More

Authors: Yanlin Chen, Yilei Chen, Rajendra Kumar, Subhasree Patro, and Florian Speelman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
Despite the wide range of problems for which quantum computers offer a computational advantage over their classical counterparts, there are also many problems for which the best known quantum algorithm provides a speedup that is only quadratic, or even subquadratic. Such a situation could also be desirable if we don't want quantum computers to solve certain problems fast - say problems relevant to post-quantum cryptography. When searching for algorithms and when analyzing the security of cryptographic schemes, we would like to have evidence that these problems are difficult to solve on quantum computers; but how do we assess the exact complexity of these problems? For most problems, there are no known ways to directly prove time lower bounds, however it can still be possible to relate the hardness of disparate problems to show conditional lower bounds. This approach has been popular in the classical community, and is being actively developed for the quantum case [Aaronson et al., 2020; Buhrman et al., 2021; Harry Buhrman et al., 2022; Andris Ambainis et al., 2022]. In this paper, by the use of the QSETH framework [Buhrman et al., 2021] we are able to understand the quantum complexity of a few natural variants of CNFSAT, such as parity-CNFSAT or counting-CNFSAT, and also are able to comment on the non-trivial complexity of approximate versions of counting-CNFSAT. Without considering such variants, the best quantum lower bounds will always be quadratically lower than the equivalent classical bounds, because of Grover’s algorithm; however, we are able to show that quantum algorithms will likely not attain even a quadratic speedup for many problems. These results have implications for the complexity of (variations of) lattice problems, the strong simulation and hitting set problems, and more. In the process, we explore the QSETH framework in greater detail and present a useful guide on how to effectively use the QSETH framework.
Cite as

Yanlin Chen, Yilei Chen, Rajendra Kumar, Subhasree Patro, and Florian Speelman. QSETH Strikes Again: Finer Quantum Lower Bounds for Lattice Problem, Strong Simulation, Hitting Set Problem, and More. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 6:1-6:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6,
  author =	{Chen, Yanlin and Chen, Yilei and Kumar, Rajendra and Patro, Subhasree and Speelman, Florian},
  title =	{{QSETH Strikes Again: Finer Quantum Lower Bounds for Lattice Problem, Strong Simulation, Hitting Set Problem, and More}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243723},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum conditional lower bounds, Fine-grained complexity, Lattice problems, Quantum strong simulation, Hitting set problem, QSETH}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.5
A Comparative Study of Compressed, Learned, and Traditional Indexing Methods for Integer Data

Authors: Lorenzo Bellomo, Giuseppe Cianci, Luca de Rosa, Paolo Ferragina, and Mattia Odorisio

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 338, 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)

Abstract
The rapid evolution of learned data structures has revolutionized database indexing, particularly for sorted integer datasets. While learned indexes excel in static scenarios due to their low memory footprint, reduced storage requirements, and fast lookup times, benchmarks like SOSD and TLI have largely overlooked compressed indexes and SIMD-based implementations of traditional indexes. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a comprehensive benchmarking framework that (i) evaluates traditional, learned, and compressed indexes across 12 datasets (real and synthetic) of varying types and sizes; (ii) integrates state-of-the-art SIMD-enhanced B-Tree variants; and (iii) measures critical performance metrics such as memory usage, construction time, and lookup efficiency. Our findings reveal that while learned indexes minimize memory usage, a feature useful when internal memory constraints are mandatory, SIMD-enhanced B-Trees consistently achieve superior lookup times with comparable extra space. On the other hand, compressed indexes like LA-vector and EliasFano provide very effective compression of the indexed data with slower access speeds (2x-3x). Another contribution of this paper is a publicly available benchmarking framework (composed of code and datasets) that makes our experiments reproducible and extensible to other indexes and datasets.
Cite as

Lorenzo Bellomo, Giuseppe Cianci, Luca de Rosa, Paolo Ferragina, and Mattia Odorisio. A Comparative Study of Compressed, Learned, and Traditional Indexing Methods for Integer Data. In 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 338, pp. 5:1-5:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bellomo_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2025.5,
  author =	{Bellomo, Lorenzo and Cianci, Giuseppe and de Rosa, Luca and Ferragina, Paolo and Odorisio, Mattia},
  title =	{{A Comparative Study of Compressed, Learned, and Traditional Indexing Methods for Integer Data}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-375-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{338},
  editor =	{Mutzel, Petra and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232439},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: indexing data structures, compression, algorithm engineering, benchmark}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.39
Sampling with a Black Box: Faster Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Vertex Deletion Problems

Authors: Barış Can Esmer and Ariel Kulik

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we present Sampling with a Black Box, a unified framework for the design of parameterized approximation algorithms for vertex deletion problems (e.g., Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, etc.). The framework relies on two components: - A Sampling Step. A polynomial-time randomized algorithm that, given a graph G, returns a random vertex v such that the optimum of G⧵ {v} is smaller by 1 than the optimum of G, with some prescribed probability q. We show that such algorithms exist for multiple vertex deletion problems. - A Black Box algorithm which is either an exact parameterized algorithm, a polynomial-time approximation algorithm, or a parameterized-approximation algorithm. The framework combines these two components together. The sampling step is applied iteratively to remove vertices from the input graph, and then the solution is extended using the black box algorithm. The process is repeated sufficiently many times so that the target approximation ratio is attained with a constant probability. We use the technique to derive parameterized approximation algorithms for several vertex deletion problems, including Feedback Vertex Set, d-Hitting Set and 𝓁-Path Vertex Cover. In particular, for every approximation ratio 1 < β < 2, we attain a parameterized β-approximation for Feedback Vertex Set, which is faster than the parameterized β-approximation of [Jana, Lokshtanov, Mandal, Rai and Saurabh, MFCS 23']. Furthermore, our algorithms are always faster than the algorithms attained using Fidelity Preserving Transformations [Fellows, Kulik, Rosamond, and Shachnai, JCSS 18'].
Cite as

Barış Can Esmer and Ariel Kulik. Sampling with a Black Box: Faster Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Vertex Deletion Problems. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 39:1-39:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{canesmer_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.39,
  author =	{Can Esmer, Bar{\i}\c{s} and Kulik, Ariel},
  title =	{{Sampling with a Black Box: Faster Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Vertex Deletion Problems}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234165},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized Approximation Algorithms, Random Sampling}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35
Chain of Grounded Objectives: Concise Goal-Oriented Prompting for Code Generation

Authors: Sangyeop Yeo, Seung-Won Hwang, and Yu-Seung Ma

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation has gained significant attention in recent years. Existing methods often aim to improve the quality of generated code by incorporating additional contextual information or guidance into input prompts. Many of these approaches adopt process-oriented reasoning strategies, mimicking human-like step-by-step thinking; however, they may not always align with the structured nature of programming languages. This paper introduces Chain of Grounded Objectives (CGO), a concise goal-oriented prompting approach that embeds functional objectives into prompts to enhance code generation. By focusing on precisely defined objectives rather than explicit procedural steps, CGO aligns more naturally with programming tasks while retaining flexibility. Empirical evaluations on HumanEval, MBPP, their extended versions, and LiveCodeBench show that CGO achieves accuracy comparable to or better than existing methods while using fewer tokens, making it a more efficient approach to LLM-based code generation.
Cite as

Sangyeop Yeo, Seung-Won Hwang, and Yu-Seung Ma. Chain of Grounded Objectives: Concise Goal-Oriented Prompting for Code Generation. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 35:1-35:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yeo_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35,
  author =	{Yeo, Sangyeop and Hwang, Seung-Won and Ma, Yu-Seung},
  title =	{{Chain of Grounded Objectives: Concise Goal-Oriented Prompting for Code Generation}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233271},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Prompt Design, Large Language Models, Code Generation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.3
Formal Verification in Solidity and Move: Insights from a Comparative Analysis

Authors: Massimo Bartoletti, Silvia Crafa, and Enrico Lipparini

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 129, 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)

Abstract
Formal verification plays a crucial role in making smart contracts safer, being able to find bugs or to guarantee their absence, as well as checking whether the business logic is correctly implemented. For Solidity, even though there already exist several mature verification tools, the semantical quirks of the language can make verification quite hard in practice. Move, on the other hand, has been designed with security and verification in mind, and it has been accompanied since its early stages by a formal verification tool, the Move Prover. In this paper, we investigate through a comparative analysis: 1) how the different designs of the two contract languages impact verification, and 2) what is the state-of-the-art of verification tools for the two languages, and how do they compare on three paradigmatic use cases. Our investigation is supported by an open dataset of verification tasks performed in Certora and in the Aptos Move Prover.
Cite as

Massimo Bartoletti, Silvia Crafa, and Enrico Lipparini. Formal Verification in Solidity and Move: Insights from a Comparative Analysis. In 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 129, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bartoletti_et_al:OASIcs.FMBC.2025.3,
  author =	{Bartoletti, Massimo and Crafa, Silvia and Lipparini, Enrico},
  title =	{{Formal Verification in Solidity and Move: Insights from a Comparative Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-371-3},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{129},
  editor =	{Marmsoler, Diego and Xu, Meng},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230302},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Smart contracts, Solidity, Move, Verification, Blockchain}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.65
On Average Baby PIH and Its Applications

Authors: Yuwei Liu, Yijia Chen, Shuangle Li, Bingkai Lin, and Xin Zheng

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
The Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) asserts that no FPT algorithm can decide whether a given 2CSP instance parameterized by the number of variables is satisfiable, or at most a constant fraction of its constraints can be satisfied simultaneously. In a recent breakthrough, Guruswami, Lin, Ren, Sun, and Wu (STOC 2024) proved the PIH under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). However, it remains a major open problem whether the PIH can be established assuming only W[1]≠FPT. Towards this goal, Guruswami, Ren, and Sandeep (CCC 2024) showed a weaker version of the PIH called the Baby PIH under W[1]≠FPT. In addition, they proposed one more intermediate assumption known as the Average Baby PIH, which might lead to further progress on the PIH. As the main contribution of this paper, we prove that the Average Baby PIH holds assuming W[1]≠FPT. Given a 2CSP instance where the number of its variables is the parameter, the Average Baby PIH states that no FPT algorithm can decide whether (i) it is satisfiable or (ii) any multi-assignment that satisfies all constraints must assign each variable more than r values on average for any fixed constant r > 1. So there is a gap between (i) and (ii) on the average number of values that are assigned to a variable, i.e., 1 vs. r. If this gap occurs in each variable instead of on average, we get the original Baby PIH. So central to our paper is an FPT self-reduction for 2CSP instances that turns the above gap for each variable into a gap on average. By the known W[1]-hardness for the Baby PIH, this proves that the Average Baby PIH holds under W[1] ≠ FPT. As applications, we obtain (i) for the first time, the W[1]-hardness of constant approximating k-ExactCover, and (ii) a tight relationship between running time lower bounds in the Average Baby PIH and approximating the parameterized Nearest Codeword Problem (k-NCP).
Cite as

Yuwei Liu, Yijia Chen, Shuangle Li, Bingkai Lin, and Xin Zheng. On Average Baby PIH and Its Applications. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 65:1-65:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{liu_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.65,
  author =	{Liu, Yuwei and Chen, Yijia and Li, Shuangle and Lin, Bingkai and Zheng, Xin},
  title =	{{On Average Baby PIH and Its Applications}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{65:1--65:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.65},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228900},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.65},
  annote =	{Keywords: Average Baby PIH, Parameterized Inapproximability, Constraint Satisfaction Problem, Exact Set Cover, W\lbrack1\rbrack-hardness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2018.20
FHJ: A Formal Model for Hierarchical Dispatching and Overriding

Authors: Yanlin Wang, Haoyuan Zhang, Bruno C. d. S. Oliveira, and Marco Servetto

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 109, 32nd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2018)

Abstract
Multiple inheritance is a valuable feature for Object-Oriented Programming. However, it is also tricky to get right, as illustrated by the extensive literature on the topic. A key issue is the ambiguity arising from inheriting multiple parents, which can have conflicting methods. Numerous existing work provides solutions for conflicts which arise from diamond inheritance: i.e. conflicts that arise from implementations sharing a common ancestor. However, most mechanisms are inadequate to deal with unintentional method conflicts: conflicts which arise from two unrelated methods that happen to share the same name and signature. This paper presents a new model called Featherweight Hierarchical Java (FHJ) that deals with unintentional method conflicts. In our new model, which is partly inspired by C++, conflicting methods arising from unrelated methods can coexist in the same class, and hierarchical dispatching supports unambiguous lookups in the presence of such conflicting methods. To avoid ambiguity, hierarchical information is employed in method dispatching, which uses a combination of static and dynamic type information to choose the implementation of a method at run-time. Furthermore, unlike all existing inheritance models, our model supports hierarchical method overriding: that is, methods can be independently overridden along the multiple inheritance hierarchy. We give illustrative examples of our language and features and formalize FHJ as a minimal Featherweight-Java style calculus.
Cite as

Yanlin Wang, Haoyuan Zhang, Bruno C. d. S. Oliveira, and Marco Servetto. FHJ: A Formal Model for Hierarchical Dispatching and Overriding. In 32nd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 109, pp. 20:1-20:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{wang_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2018.20,
  author =	{Wang, Yanlin and Zhang, Haoyuan and Oliveira, Bruno C. d. S. and Servetto, Marco},
  title =	{{FHJ: A Formal Model for Hierarchical Dispatching and Overriding}},
  booktitle =	{32nd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2018)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-079-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{109},
  editor =	{Millstein, Todd},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2018.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-92259},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2018.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: multiple inheritance, hierarchical dispatching, OOP, language design}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 10 Document/PDF
  • 9 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 7 2025
  • 1 2018

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Bartoletti, Massimo
  • 1 Bellomo, Lorenzo
  • 1 Can Esmer, Barış
  • 1 Chen, Yanlin
  • 1 Chen, Yijia
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 8 LIPIcs
  • 2 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
  • 1 Information systems → Database query processing
  • 1 Security and privacy → Software and application security
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Formal software verification
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Blockchain
  • 1 Artificial Intelligence
  • 1 Average Baby PIH
  • 1 Circuit Complexity
  • 1 Code Generation
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact