7 Search Results for "Hammond, Kevin"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2
A DSL for Swarm Intelligence Algorithms

Authors: Kevin Martins and Rui Mendes

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 135, 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)

Abstract
We propose a domain-specific language to simplify the expression of Swarm Intelligence algorithms. These algorithms are typically introduced through metaphors, requiring practitioners to manually translate them into low-level implementations.This process can obscure intent and hinder reproducibility. The proposed DSL bridges this gap by capturing algorithmic behavior at a higher level of abstraction. We demonstrate its expressiveness in a few lines of code and evaluate its feasibility through a reference implementation. A discussion is presented that includes empirical comparisons with traditional implementations and future directions of the proposed DSL.
Cite as

Kevin Martins and Rui Mendes. A DSL for Swarm Intelligence Algorithms. In 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 135, pp. 2:1-2:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{martins_et_al:OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2,
  author =	{Martins, Kevin and Mendes, Rui},
  title =	{{A DSL for Swarm Intelligence Algorithms}},
  booktitle =	{14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:17},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-387-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{135},
  editor =	{Baptista, Jorge and Barateiro, Jos\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236826},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Domain Specific Languages, Swarm Intelligence, Global Optimization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4
Distributive Laws of Monadic Containers

Authors: Chris Purdy and Stefania Damato

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 342, 11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025)

Abstract
Containers are used to carve out a class of strictly positive data types in terms of shapes and positions. They can be interpreted via a fully-faithful functor into endofunctors on Set. Monadic containers are those containers whose interpretation as a Set functor carries a monad structure. The category of containers is closed under container composition and is a monoidal category, whereas monadic containers do not in general compose. In this paper, we develop a characterisation of distributive laws of monadic containers. Distributive laws were introduced as a sufficient condition for the composition of the underlying functors of two monads to also carry a monad structure. Our development parallels Ahman and Uustalu’s characterisation of distributive laws of directed containers, i.e. containers whose Set functor interpretation carries a comonad structure. Furthermore, by combining our work with theirs, we construct characterisations of mixed distributive laws (i.e. of directed containers over monadic containers and vice versa), thereby completing the "zoo" of container characterisations of (co)monads and their distributive laws. We have found these characterisations amenable to development of existence and uniqueness proofs of distributive laws, particularly in the mechanised setting of Cubical Agda, in which most of the theory of this paper has been formalised.
Cite as

Chris Purdy and Stefania Damato. Distributive Laws of Monadic Containers. In 11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 342, pp. 4:1-4:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{purdy_et_al:LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4,
  author =	{Purdy, Chris and Damato, Stefania},
  title =	{{Distributive Laws of Monadic Containers}},
  booktitle =	{11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-383-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{342},
  editor =	{C\^{i}rstea, Corina and Knapp, Alexander},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235633},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: distributive laws, monadic containers, monads, dependent types, cubical agda}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7
Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories

Authors: Mauricio Ayala-Rincón, David M. Cerna, Temur Kutsia, and Christophe Ringeissen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We look at the generalization problem modulo some equational theories. This problem is dual to the unification problem: given two input terms, we want to find a common term whose respective two instances are equivalent to the original terms modulo the theory. There exist algorithms for finding generalizations over various equational theories. We focus on modular construction of equational generalization algorithms for the union of signature-disjoint theories. Specifically, we consider the class of regular and collapse-free theories, showing how to combine existing generalization algorithms to produce specific solutions in these cases. Additionally, we identify a class of theories that admit a generalization algorithm based on the application of axioms to resolve the problem. To define this class, we rely on the notion of syntactic theories, a concept originally introduced to develop unification procedures similar to the one known for syntactic unification. We demonstrate that syntactic theories are also helpful in developing generalization procedures similar to those used for syntactic generalization.
Cite as

Mauricio Ayala-Rincón, David M. Cerna, Temur Kutsia, and Christophe Ringeissen. Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 7:1-7:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ayalarincon_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7,
  author =	{Ayala-Rinc\'{o}n, Mauricio and Cerna, David M. and Kutsia, Temur and Ringeissen, Christophe},
  title =	{{Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236228},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Generalization, Anti-unification, Equational theories, Combination}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.14
IsaBIL: A Framework for Verifying (In)correctness of Binaries in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Matt Griffin, Brijesh Dongol, and Azalea Raad

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
This paper presents IsaBIL, a binary analysis framework in Isabelle/HOL that is based on the widely used Binary Analysis Platform (BAP). Specifically, in IsaBIL, we formalise BAP’s intermediate language, called BIL and integrate it with Hoare logic (to enable proofs of correctness) as well as incorrectness logic (to enable proofs of incorrectness). IsaBIL inherits the full flexibility of BAP, allowing us to verify binaries for a wide range of languages (C, C++, Rust), toolchains (LLVM, Ghidra) and target architectures (x86, RISC-V), and can also be used when the source code for a binary is unavailable. To make verification tractable, we develop a number of big-step rules that combine BIL’s existing small-step rules at different levels of abstraction to support reuse. We develop high-level reasoning rules for RISC-V instructions (our main target architecture) to further optimise verification. Additionally, we develop Isabelle proof tactics that exploit common patterns in C binaries for RISC-V to discharge large numbers of proof goals (often in the 100s) automatically. IsaBIL includes an Isabelle/ML based parser for BIL programs, allowing one to automatically generate the associated Isabelle/HOL program locale from a BAP output. Taken together, IsaBIL provides a highly flexible proof environment for program binaries. As examples, we prove correctness of key examples from the Joint Strike Fighter coding standards and the MITRE database.
Cite as

Matt Griffin, Brijesh Dongol, and Azalea Raad. IsaBIL: A Framework for Verifying (In)correctness of Binaries in Isabelle/HOL. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 14:1-14:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{griffin_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.14,
  author =	{Griffin, Matt and Dongol, Brijesh and Raad, Azalea},
  title =	{{IsaBIL: A Framework for Verifying (In)correctness of Binaries in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233070},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Binary Analysis Platform, Isabelle/HOL, Hoare Logic, Incorrectness Logic}
}
Document
Vision
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.1.1.9
Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-Based AI for Self-Determination

Authors: Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, John Domingue, Sabrina Kirrane, Oshani Seneviratne, Aisling Third, and Maria-Esther Vidal

Published in: TGDK, Volume 1, Issue 1 (2023): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 1, Issue 1

Abstract
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as fundamental platforms for powering intelligent decision-making and a wide range of Artificial Intelligence (AI) services across major corporations such as Google, Walmart, and AirBnb. KGs complement Machine Learning (ML) algorithms by providing data context and semantics, thereby enabling further inference and question-answering capabilities. The integration of KGs with neuronal learning (e.g., Large Language Models (LLMs)) is currently a topic of active research, commonly named neuro-symbolic AI. Despite the numerous benefits that can be accomplished with KG-based AI, its growing ubiquity within online services may result in the loss of self-determination for citizens as a fundamental societal issue. The more we rely on these technologies, which are often centralised, the less citizens will be able to determine their own destinies. To counter this threat, AI regulation, such as the European Union (EU) AI Act, is being proposed in certain regions. The regulation sets what technologists need to do, leading to questions concerning How the output of AI systems can be trusted? What is needed to ensure that the data fuelling and the inner workings of these artefacts are transparent? How can AI be made accountable for its decision-making? This paper conceptualises the foundational topics and research pillars to support KG-based AI for self-determination. Drawing upon this conceptual framework, challenges and opportunities for citizen self-determination are illustrated and analysed in a real-world scenario. As a result, we propose a research agenda aimed at accomplishing the recommended objectives.
Cite as

Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, John Domingue, Sabrina Kirrane, Oshani Seneviratne, Aisling Third, and Maria-Esther Vidal. Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-Based AI for Self-Determination. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 9:1-9:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{ibanez_et_al:TGDK.1.1.9,
  author =	{Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez, Luis-Daniel and Domingue, John and Kirrane, Sabrina and Seneviratne, Oshani and Third, Aisling and Vidal, Maria-Esther},
  title =	{{Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-Based AI for Self-Determination}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{9:1--9:32},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{1},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-194839},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.1.1.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Trust, Accountability, Autonomy, AI, Knowledge Graphs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2007.1186
Automatic Amortised Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis

Authors: Christoph A. Herrmann, Armelle Bonenfant, Kevin Hammond, Steffen Jost, Hans-Wolfgang Loidl, and Robert Pointon

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 6, 7th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'07) (2007)

Abstract
Our research focuses on formally bounded WCET analysis, where we aim to provide absolute guarantees on execution time bounds. In this paper, we describe how amortisation can be used to improve the quality of the results that are obtained from a fully-automatic and formally guaranteed WCET analysis, by delivering analysis results that are parameterised on specific input patterns and which take account of relations between these patterns. We have implemented our approach to give a tool that is capable of predicting execution costs for a typical embedded system development platform, a Renesas board with a Renesas M32C/85U processor. We show that not only is the amortised approach applicable in theory, but that it can be applied automatically to yield good WCET results.
Cite as

Christoph A. Herrmann, Armelle Bonenfant, Kevin Hammond, Steffen Jost, Hans-Wolfgang Loidl, and Robert Pointon. Automatic Amortised Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis. In 7th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'07). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 6, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{herrmann_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2007.1186,
  author =	{Herrmann, Christoph A. and Bonenfant, Armelle and Hammond, Kevin and Jost, Steffen and Loidl, Hans-Wolfgang and Pointon, Robert},
  title =	{{Automatic Amortised Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{7th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'07)},
  pages =	{1--6},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-05-7},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2007},
  volume =	{6},
  editor =	{Rochange, Christine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2007.1186},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-11868},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2007.1186},
  annote =	{Keywords: Amortisation, functional programming, performance measurement, static analysis, type and effect systems, worst-case execution time}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2006.677
Towards Formally Verifiable WCET Analysis for a Functional Programming Language

Authors: Kevin Hammond, Christian Ferdinand, Reinhold Heckmann, Roy Dyckhoff, Martin Hofman, Steffen Jost, Hans-Wolfgang Loidl, Greg Michaelson, Robert Pointon, Norman Scaife, Jocelyn Sérot, and Andy Wallace

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 4, 6th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'06) (2006)

Abstract
This paper describes ongoing work aimed at the construction of formal cost models and analyses to yield verifiable guarantees of resource usage in the context of real-time embedded systems. Our work is conducted in terms of the domain-specific language Hume, a language that combines functional programming for computations with finitestate automata for specifying reactive systems. We outline an approach in which high-level information derived from source-code analysis can be combined with worst-case execution time information obtained from high quality abstract interpretation of low-level binary code.
Cite as

Kevin Hammond, Christian Ferdinand, Reinhold Heckmann, Roy Dyckhoff, Martin Hofman, Steffen Jost, Hans-Wolfgang Loidl, Greg Michaelson, Robert Pointon, Norman Scaife, Jocelyn Sérot, and Andy Wallace. Towards Formally Verifiable WCET Analysis for a Functional Programming Language. In 6th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'06). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 4, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2006)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hammond_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2006.677,
  author =	{Hammond, Kevin and Ferdinand, Christian and Heckmann, Reinhold and Dyckhoff, Roy and Hofman, Martin and Jost, Steffen and Loidl, Hans-Wolfgang and Michaelson, Greg and Pointon, Robert and Scaife, Norman and S\'{e}rot, Jocelyn and Wallace, Andy},
  title =	{{Towards Formally Verifiable WCET Analysis for a Functional Programming Language}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'06)},
  pages =	{1--6},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-03-3},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2006},
  volume =	{4},
  editor =	{Mueller, Frank},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2006.677},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-6773},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2006.677},
  annote =	{Keywords: Worst-case execution time, functional programming, Hume, cost model, asynchronous, finite state machine}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 7 Document/PDF
  • 5 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2007
  • 1 2006

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Hammond, Kevin
  • 2 Jost, Steffen
  • 2 Loidl, Hans-Wolfgang
  • 2 Pointon, Robert
  • 1 Ayala-Rincón, Mauricio
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 3 LIPIcs
  • 3 OASIcs
  • 1 TGDK

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Distributed artificial intelligence
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Symbolic and algebraic manipulation
  • 1 Human-centered computing → Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms
  • 1 Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 functional programming
  • 1 AI
  • 1 Accountability
  • 1 Amortisation
  • 1 Anti-unification
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact