12 Search Results for "Lammich, Peter"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.3
A Formal Analysis of Capacity Scaling Algorithms for Minimum Cost Flows

Authors: Mohammad Abdulaziz and Thomas Ammer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract
We present a formalisation of the correctness of algorithms to solve minimum-cost flow problems, in Isabelle/HOL. Two of the algorithms are based on the technique of scaling, most notably Orlin’s algorithm, which has the fastest running time for the problem of minimum-cost flow. Our work uncovered a number of complications in the proofs of the results we formalised, the resolution of which required significant effort. Our work is also the first to formally consider the problem of minimum-cost flows and, more generally, scaling algorithms.
Cite as

Mohammad Abdulaziz and Thomas Ammer. A Formal Analysis of Capacity Scaling Algorithms for Minimum Cost Flows. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 3:1-3:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{abdulaziz_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.3,
  author =	{Abdulaziz, Mohammad and Ammer, Thomas},
  title =	{{A Formal Analysis of Capacity Scaling Algorithms for Minimum Cost Flows}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207316},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Network Flows, Formal Verification, Combinatorial Optimisation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.12
A Modular Formalization of Superposition in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Martin Desharnais, Balazs Toth, Uwe Waldmann, Jasmin Blanchette, and Sophie Tourret

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract
Superposition is an efficient proof calculus for reasoning about first-order logic with equality that is implemented in many automatic theorem provers. It works by saturating the given set of clauses and is refutationally complete, meaning that if the set is inconsistent, the saturation will contain a contradiction. In this work, we restructured the completeness proof to cleanly separate the ground (i.e., variable-free) and nonground aspects, and we formalized the result in Isabelle/HOL. We relied on the IsaFoR library for first-order terms and on the Isabelle saturation framework.
Cite as

Martin Desharnais, Balazs Toth, Uwe Waldmann, Jasmin Blanchette, and Sophie Tourret. A Modular Formalization of Superposition in Isabelle/HOL. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 12:1-12:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{desharnais_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.12,
  author =	{Desharnais, Martin and Toth, Balazs and Waldmann, Uwe and Blanchette, Jasmin and Tourret, Sophie},
  title =	{{A Modular Formalization of Superposition in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207401},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Superposition, verification, first-order logic, higher-order logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.23
A Generalised Union of Rely-Guarantee and Separation Logic Using Permission Algebras

Authors: Vincent Jackson, Toby Murray, and Christine Rizkallah

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract
This paper describes GenRGSep, an Isabelle/HOL library for the development of RGSep logics using a general algebraic state model. In particular, we develop an algebraic state models based on resource algebras that assume neither the presence of unit resources or the cancellativity law. If a new resource model is required, its components need only be proven an instance of a permission algebra, and then they can be composed together using tuples and functions. The proof of soundness is performed by Vafeiadis' operational soundness method. This method was originally formulated with respect to a concrete heap model. This paper adapts it to account for the absence of both units as well as the cancellativity law.
Cite as

Vincent Jackson, Toby Murray, and Christine Rizkallah. A Generalised Union of Rely-Guarantee and Separation Logic Using Permission Algebras. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 23:1-23:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jackson_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.23,
  author =	{Jackson, Vincent and Murray, Toby and Rizkallah, Christine},
  title =	{{A Generalised Union of Rely-Guarantee and Separation Logic Using Permission Algebras}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207510},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: verification, concurrency, rely-guarantee, separation logic, resource algebras}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33
Correctly Compiling Proofs About Programs Without Proving Compilers Correct

Authors: Audrey Seo, Christopher Lam, Dan Grossman, and Talia Ringer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract
Guaranteeing correct compilation is nearly synonymous with compiler verification. However, the correctness guarantees for certified compilers and translation validation can be stronger than we need. While many compilers do have incorrect behavior, even when a compiler bug occurs it may not change the program’s behavior meaningfully with respect to its specification. Many real-world specifications are necessarily partial in that they do not completely specify all of a program’s behavior. While compiler verification and formal methods have had great success for safety-critical systems, there are magnitudes more code, such as math libraries, compiled with incorrect compilers, that would benefit from a guarantee of its partial specification. This paper explores a technique to get guarantees about compiled programs even in the presence of an unverified, or even incorrect, compiler. Our workflow compiles programs, specifications, and proof objects, from an embedded source language and logic to an embedded target language and logic. We implement two simple imperative languages, each with its own Hoare-style program logic, and a system for instantiating proof compilers out of compilers between these two languages that fulfill certain equational conditions in Coq. We instantiate our system on four compilers: one that is incomplete, two that are incorrect, and one that is correct but unverified. We use these instances to compile Hoare proofs for several programs, and we are able to leverage compiled proofs to assist in proofs of larger programs. Our proof compiler system is formally proven sound in Coq. We demonstrate how our approach enables strong target program guarantees even in the presence of incorrect compilation, opening up new options for which proof burdens one might shoulder instead of, or in addition to, compiler correctness.
Cite as

Audrey Seo, Christopher Lam, Dan Grossman, and Talia Ringer. Correctly Compiling Proofs About Programs Without Proving Compilers Correct. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 33:1-33:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{seo_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33,
  author =	{Seo, Audrey and Lam, Christopher and Grossman, Dan and Ringer, Talia},
  title =	{{Correctly Compiling Proofs About Programs Without Proving Compilers Correct}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207612},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof transformations, compiler validation, program logics, proof engineering}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.35
Formal Verification of the Empty Hexagon Number

Authors: Bernardo Subercaseaux, Wojciech Nawrocki, James Gallicchio, Cayden Codel, Mario Carneiro, and Marijn J. H. Heule

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract
A recent breakthrough in computer-assisted mathematics showed that every set of 30 points in the plane in general position (i.e., no three points on a common line) contains an empty convex hexagon. Heule and Scheucher solved this problem with a combination of geometric insights and automated reasoning techniques by constructing CNF formulas ϕ_n, with O(n⁴) clauses, such that if ϕ_n is unsatisfiable then every set of n points in general position must contain an empty convex hexagon. An unsatisfiability proof for n = 30 was then found with a SAT solver using 17 300 CPU hours of parallel computation. In this paper, we formalize and verify this result in the Lean theorem prover. Our formalization covers ideas in discrete computational geometry and SAT encoding techniques by introducing a framework that connects geometric objects to propositional assignments. We see this as a key step towards the formal verification of other SAT-based results in geometry, since the abstractions we use have been successfully applied to similar problems. Overall, we hope that our work sets a new standard for the verification of geometry problems relying on extensive computation, and that it increases the trust the mathematical community places in computer-assisted proofs.
Cite as

Bernardo Subercaseaux, Wojciech Nawrocki, James Gallicchio, Cayden Codel, Mario Carneiro, and Marijn J. H. Heule. Formal Verification of the Empty Hexagon Number. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 35:1-35:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{subercaseaux_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.35,
  author =	{Subercaseaux, Bernardo and Nawrocki, Wojciech and Gallicchio, James and Codel, Cayden and Carneiro, Mario and Heule, Marijn J. H.},
  title =	{{Formal Verification of the Empty Hexagon Number}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207633},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Empty Hexagon Number, Discrete Computational Geometry, Erd\H{o}s-Szekeres}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.25
Trusted Scalable SAT Solving with On-The-Fly LRAT Checking

Authors: Dominik Schreiber

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 305, 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)

Abstract
Recent advances have enabled powerful distributed SAT solvers to emit proofs of unsatisfiability, which renders them as trustworthy as sequential solvers. However, this mode of operation is still lacking behind conventional distributed solving in terms of scalability. We argue that the core limiting factor of such approaches is the requirement of a single, persistent artifact at the end of solving that is then checked independently (and sequentially). As an alternative, we propose a bottleneck-free setup that exploits recent advancements in producing and processing LRAT information to immediately check all solvers' reasoning on-the-fly during solving. In terms of clause sharing, our approach transfers the guarantee of a derived clause’s soundness from the sending to the receiving side via cryptographic signatures. Experiments with up to 2432 cores (32 nodes) indicate that our approach reduces the running time overhead incurred by proof checking by an order of magnitude, down to a median overhead of ≤ 42% over non trusted solving.
Cite as

Dominik Schreiber. Trusted Scalable SAT Solving with On-The-Fly LRAT Checking. In 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 305, pp. 25:1-25:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schreiber:LIPIcs.SAT.2024.25,
  author =	{Schreiber, Dominik},
  title =	{{Trusted Scalable SAT Solving with On-The-Fly LRAT Checking}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-334-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{305},
  editor =	{Chakraborty, Supratik and Jiang, Jie-Hong Roland},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-205477},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT solving, distributed algorithms, proofs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.24
Refinement of Parallel Algorithms down to LLVM

Authors: Peter Lammich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 237, 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)

Abstract
We present a stepwise refinement approach to develop verified parallel algorithms, down to efficient LLVM code. The resulting algorithms' performance is competitive with their counterparts implemented in C/C++. Our approach is backwards compatible with the Isabelle Refinement Framework, such that existing sequential formalizations can easily be adapted or re-used. As case study, we verify a parallel quicksort algorithm, and show that it performs on par with its C++ implementation, and is competitive to state-of-the-art parallel sorting algorithms.
Cite as

Peter Lammich. Refinement of Parallel Algorithms down to LLVM. In 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 237, pp. 24:1-24:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lammich:LIPIcs.ITP.2022.24,
  author =	{Lammich, Peter},
  title =	{{Refinement of Parallel Algorithms down to LLVM}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-252-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{237},
  editor =	{Andronick, June and de Moura, Leonardo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-167333},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle, Concurrent Separation Logic, Parallel Sorting, LLVM}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.3
Bounded-Deducibility Security (Invited Paper)

Authors: Andrei Popescu, Thomas Bauereiss, and Peter Lammich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 193, 12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021)

Abstract
We describe Bounded-Deducibility (BD) security, an expressive framework for the specification and verification of information-flow security. The framework grew by confronting concrete challenges of specifying and verifying fine-grained confidentiality properties in some realistic web-based systems. The concepts and theorems that constitute this framework have an eventful history of such "confrontations", often involving trial and error, which are reported in previous papers. This paper is the first to focus on the framework itself rather than the case studies, gathering in one place all the abstract results about BD security.
Cite as

Andrei Popescu, Thomas Bauereiss, and Peter Lammich. Bounded-Deducibility Security (Invited Paper). In 12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 193, pp. 3:1-3:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{popescu_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2021.3,
  author =	{Popescu, Andrei and Bauereiss, Thomas and Lammich, Peter},
  title =	{{Bounded-Deducibility Security}},
  booktitle =	{12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-188-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{193},
  editor =	{Cohen, Liron and Kaliszyk, Cezary},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138982},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Information-flow security, Unwinding proof method, Compositionality, Verification}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.11
A Verified and Compositional Translation of LTL to Deterministic Rabin Automata

Authors: Julian Brunner, Benedikt Seidl, and Salomon Sickert

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 141, 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)

Abstract
We present a formalisation of the unified translation approach from linear temporal logic (LTL) to omega-automata from [Javier Esparza et al., 2018]. This approach decomposes LTL formulas into "simple" languages and allows a clear separation of concerns: first, we formalise the purely logical result yielding this decomposition; second, we develop a generic, executable, and expressive automata library providing necessary operations on automata to re-combine the "simple" languages; third, we instantiate this generic theory to obtain a construction for deterministic Rabin automata (DRA). We extract from this particular instantiation an executable tool translating LTL to DRAs. To the best of our knowledge this is the first verified translation of LTL to DRAs that is proven to be double-exponential in the worst case which asymptotically matches the known lower bound.
Cite as

Julian Brunner, Benedikt Seidl, and Salomon Sickert. A Verified and Compositional Translation of LTL to Deterministic Rabin Automata. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 11:1-11:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brunner_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.11,
  author =	{Brunner, Julian and Seidl, Benedikt and Sickert, Salomon},
  title =	{{A Verified and Compositional Translation of LTL to Deterministic Rabin Automata}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110664},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automata Theory, Automata over Infinite Words, Deterministic Automata, Linear Temporal Logic, Model Checking, Verified Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.20
Refinement with Time - Refining the Run-Time of Algorithms in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Maximilian P. L. Haslbeck and Peter Lammich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 141, 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)

Abstract
Separation Logic with Time Credits is a well established method to formally verify the correctness and run-time of algorithms, which has been applied to various medium-sized use-cases. Refinement is a technique in program verification that makes software projects of larger scale manageable. Combining these two techniques for the first time, we present a methodology for verifying the functional correctness and the run-time analysis of algorithms in a modular way. We use it to verify Kruskal’s minimum spanning tree algorithm and the Edmonds - Karp algorithm for network flow. An adaptation of the Isabelle Refinement Framework [Lammich and Tuerk, 2012] enables us to specify the functional result and the run-time behaviour of abstract algorithms which can be refined to more concrete algorithms. From these, executable imperative code can be synthesized by an extension of the Sepref tool [Lammich, 2015], preserving correctness and the run-time bounds of the abstract algorithm.
Cite as

Maximilian P. L. Haslbeck and Peter Lammich. Refinement with Time - Refining the Run-Time of Algorithms in Isabelle/HOL. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 20:1-20:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{haslbeck_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.20,
  author =	{Haslbeck, Maximilian P. L. and Lammich, Peter},
  title =	{{Refinement with Time - Refining the Run-Time of Algorithms in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110754},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle, Time Complexity Analysis, Separation Logic, Program Verification, Refinement, Run Time, Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.22
Generating Verified LLVM from Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Peter Lammich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 141, 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)

Abstract
We present a framework to generate verified LLVM programs from Isabelle/HOL. It is based on a code generator that generates LLVM text from a simplified fragment of LLVM, shallowly embedded into Isabelle/HOL. On top, we have developed a separation logic, a verification condition generator, and an LLVM backend to the Isabelle Refinement Framework. As case studies, we have produced verified LLVM implementations of binary search and the Knuth-Morris-Pratt string search algorithm. These are one order of magnitude faster than the Standard-ML implementations produced with the original Refinement Framework, and on par with unverified C implementations. Adoption of the original correctness proofs to the new LLVM backend was straightforward. The trusted code base of our approach is the shallow embedding of the LLVM fragment and the code generator, which is a pretty printer combined with some straightforward compilation steps.
Cite as

Peter Lammich. Generating Verified LLVM from Isabelle/HOL. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 22:1-22:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lammich:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.22,
  author =	{Lammich, Peter},
  title =	{{Generating Verified LLVM from Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110777},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle/HOL, LLVM, Separation Logic, Verification Condition Generator, Code Generation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.23
Proof Pearl: Purely Functional, Simple and Efficient Priority Search Trees and Applications to Prim and Dijkstra

Authors: Peter Lammich and Tobias Nipkow

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 141, 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)

Abstract
The starting point of this paper is a new, purely functional, simple and efficient data structure combining a search tree and a priority queue, which we call a priority search tree. The salient feature of priority search trees is that they offer a decrease-key operation, something that is missing from other simple, purely functional priority queue implementations. As two applications of this data structure we verify purely functional, simple and efficient implementations of Prim’s and Dijkstra’s algorithms. This constitutes the first verification of an executable and even efficient version of Prim’s algorithm.
Cite as

Peter Lammich and Tobias Nipkow. Proof Pearl: Purely Functional, Simple and Efficient Priority Search Trees and Applications to Prim and Dijkstra. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lammich_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.23,
  author =	{Lammich, Peter and Nipkow, Tobias},
  title =	{{Proof Pearl: Purely Functional, Simple and Efficient Priority Search Trees and Applications to Prim and Dijkstra}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110788},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Priority queue, Dijkstra’s algorithm, Prim’s algorithm, verification, Isabelle}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Lammich, Peter
  • 1 Abdulaziz, Mohammad
  • 1 Ammer, Thomas
  • 1 Bauereiss, Thomas
  • 1 Blanchette, Jasmin
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Program verification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Separation logic
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Distributed algorithms
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Parallel algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Isabelle
  • 3 verification
  • 2 LLVM
  • 2 Separation Logic
  • 1 Algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 12 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 6 2024
  • 4 2019
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2022

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact