9 Search Results for "Sankar, Govind S."

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.12
Density Matters: A Complexity Dichotomy of Deleting Edges to Bound Subgraph Density

Authors: Matthias Bentert, Tom-Lukas Breitkopf, Vincent Froese, Anton Herrmann, and André Nichterlein

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
We study τ-Bounded-Density Edge Deletion (τ-BDED), where given an undirected graph G, the task is to remove as few edges as possible to obtain a graph G' where no subgraph of G' has density more than τ. The density of a (sub)graph is the number of edges divided by the number of vertices. This problem was recently introduced and shown to be NP-hard for τ ∈ {2/3, 3/4, 1 + 1/25}, but polynomial-time solvable for τ ∈ {0,1/2,1} [Bazgan et al., JCSS 2025]. We provide a complete dichotomy with respect to the target density τ: 1) If 2τ ∈ ℕ (half-integral target density) or τ < 2/3, then τ-BDED is polynomial-time solvable. 2) Otherwise, τ-BDED is NP-hard. We complement the NP-hardness with fixed-parameter tractability with respect to the treewidth of G. Moreover, for integral target density τ ∈ ℕ, we show τ-BDED to be solvable in randomized O(m^{1 + o(1)}) time. Our algorithmic results are based on a reduction to a new general flow problem on restricted networks that, depending on τ, can be solved via Maximum s-t-Flow or General Factors. We believe this connection between these variants of flow and matching to be of independent interest.
Cite as

Matthias Bentert, Tom-Lukas Breitkopf, Vincent Froese, Anton Herrmann, and André Nichterlein. Density Matters: A Complexity Dichotomy of Deleting Edges to Bound Subgraph Density. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 12:1-12:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bentert_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.12,
  author =	{Bentert, Matthias and Breitkopf, Tom-Lukas and Froese, Vincent and Herrmann, Anton and Nichterlein, Andr\'{e}},
  title =	{{Density Matters: A Complexity Dichotomy of Deleting Edges to Bound Subgraph Density}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255012},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Transshipment, Maximum Flow, General Factors, Matching, Graph Modification Problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.3
Generalized Graph Packing Problems Parameterized by Treewidth

Authors: Barış Can Esmer and Dániel Marx

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
H-Packing is the problem of finding a maximum number of vertex-disjoint copies of H in a given graph G. H-Partition is the special case of finding a set of vertex-disjoint copies that cover each vertex of G exactly once. Our goal is to study these problems and some generalizations on bounded-treewidth graphs. The case of H being a triangle is well understood: given a tree decomposition of G having treewidth tw, the K₃-Packing problem can be solved in time 2^tw⋅ n^O(1), while Lokshtanov et al. [ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2018] showed, under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), that there is no (2-ε)^tw⋅ n^O(1) algorithm for any ε > 0 even for K₃-Partition. Similar results can be obtained for any other clique K_d for d ≥ 3. We provide generalizations in two directions: - We consider a generalization of the problem where every vertex can be used at most c times for some c ≥ 1. When H is any clique K_d with d ≥ 3, then we give upper and lower bounds showing that the optimal running time increases to (c+1)^tw⋅ n^O(1). We consider two variants depending on whether a copy of H can be used multiple times in the packing. - If H is not a clique, then the dependence of the running time on treewidth may not be even single exponential. Specifically, we show that if H is any fixed graph where not every 2-connected component is a clique, then there is no 2^o(tw log tw)⋅ n^O(1) algorithm for H-Partition, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH).
Cite as

Barış Can Esmer and Dániel Marx. Generalized Graph Packing Problems Parameterized by Treewidth. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 3:1-3:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{canesmer_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.3,
  author =	{Can Esmer, Bar{\i}\c{s} and Marx, D\'{a}niel},
  title =	{{Generalized Graph Packing Problems Parameterized by Treewidth}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244713},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Packing, Graph Partitioning, Parameterized Complexity, Treewidth, Pathwidth, pw-SETH, Single-Exponential Lower Bound, Slightly Superexponential Lower Bound}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13
Tight Bounds for Some Classical Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth

Authors: Narek Bojikian, Vera Chekan, and Stefan Kratsch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
Cutwidth is a widely studied parameter and it quantifies how well a graph can be decomposed along small edge-cuts. It complements pathwidth, which captures decomposition by small vertex separators, and it is well-known that cutwidth upper-bounds pathwidth. The SETH-tight parameterized complexity of problems on graphs of bounded pathwidth (and treewidth) has been actively studied over the past decade while for cutwidth the complexity of many classical problems remained open. For Hamiltonian Cycle, it is known that a (2+√2)^{pw} n^𝒪(1) algorithm is optimal for pathwidth under SETH [Cygan et al. JACM 2018]. Van Geffen et al. [J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 2020] and Bojikian et al. [STACS 2023] asked which running time is optimal for this problem parameterized by cutwidth. We answer this question with (1+√2)^{ctw} n^𝒪(1) by providing matching upper and lower bounds. Second, as our main technical contribution, we close the gap left by van Heck [2018] for Partition Into Triangles (and Triangle Packing) by improving both upper and lower bound and getting a tight bound of ∛{3}^{ctw} n^𝒪(1), which to our knowledge exhibits the only known tight non-integral basis apart from Hamiltonian Cycle [Cygan et al. JACM 2018] and C₄-Hitting Set [SODA 2025]. We show that the cuts inducing a disjoint union of paths of length three (unions of so-called Z-cuts) lie at the core of the complexity of the problem - usually lower-bound constructions use simpler cuts inducing either a matching or a disjoint union of bicliques. Finally, we determine the optimal running times for Max Cut (2^{ctw} n^𝒪(1)) and Induced Matching (3^{ctw} n^𝒪(1)) by providing matching lower bounds for the existing algorithms - the latter result also answers an open question for treewidth by Chaudhary and Zehavi [WG 2023].
Cite as

Narek Bojikian, Vera Chekan, and Stefan Kratsch. Tight Bounds for Some Classical Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 13:1-13:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bojikian_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13,
  author =	{Bojikian, Narek and Chekan, Vera and Kratsch, Stefan},
  title =	{{Tight Bounds for Some Classical Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244815},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized complexity, cutwidth, Hamiltonian cycle, triangle packing, max cut, induced matching}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.7
Parameterised Holant Problems

Authors: Panagiotis Aivasiliotis, Andreas Göbel, Marc Roth, and Johannes Schmitt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We investigate the complexity of parameterised holant problems p-Holant(𝒮) for families of symmetric signatures 𝒮. The parameterised holant framework has been introduced by Curticapean in 2015 as a counter-part to the classical and well-established theory of holographic reductions and algorithms, and it constitutes an extensive family of coloured and weighted counting constraint satisfaction problems on graph-like structures, encoding as special cases various well-studied counting problems in parameterised and fine-grained complexity theory such as counting edge-colourful k-matchings, graph-factors, Eulerian orientations or, more generally, subgraphs with weighted degree constraints. We establish an exhaustive complexity trichotomy along the set of signatures 𝒮: Depending on the signatures, p-Holant(𝒮) is either 1) solvable in "FPT-near-linear time", i.e., in time f(k)⋅ 𝒪̃(|x|), or 2) solvable in "FPT-matrix-multiplication time", i.e., in time f(k)⋅ {𝒪}(n^{ω}), where n is the number of vertices of the underlying graph, but not solvable in FPT-near-linear time, unless the Triangle Conjecture fails, or 3) #W[1]-complete and no significant improvement over the naive brute force algorithm is possible unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. This classification reveals a significant and surprising gap in the complexity landscape of parameterised Holants: Not only is every instance either fixed-parameter tractable or #W[1]-complete, but additionally, every FPT instance is solvable in time (at most) f(k)⋅ {𝒪}(n^{ω}). We show that there are infinitely many instances of each of the types; for example, all constant signatures yield holant problems of type (1), and the problem of counting edge-colourful k-matchings modulo p is of type (p) for p ∈ {2,3}. Finally, we also establish a complete classification for a natural uncoloured version of parameterised holant problem p-UnColHolant(𝒮), which encodes as special cases the non-coloured analogues of the aforementioned examples. We show that the complexity of p-UnColHolant(𝒮) is different: Depending on 𝒮 all instances are either solvable in FPT-near-linear time, or #W[1]-complete, that is, there are no instances of type (2).
Cite as

Panagiotis Aivasiliotis, Andreas Göbel, Marc Roth, and Johannes Schmitt. Parameterised Holant Problems. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 7:1-7:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aivasiliotis_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.7,
  author =	{Aivasiliotis, Panagiotis and G\"{o}bel, Andreas and Roth, Marc and Schmitt, Johannes},
  title =	{{Parameterised Holant Problems}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233842},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: holant problems, counting problems, parameterised algorithms, fine-grained complexity theory, homomorphisms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.20
Group Fairness and Multi-Criteria Optimization in School Assignment

Authors: Santhini K. A., Kamesh Munagala, Meghana Nasre, and Govind S. Sankar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
We consider the problem of assigning students to schools when students have different utilities for schools and schools have limited capacities. The students belong to demographic groups, and fairness over these groups is captured either by concave objectives, or additional constraints on the utility of the groups. We present approximation algorithms for this assignment problem with group fairness via convex program rounding. These algorithms achieve various trade-offs between capacity violation and running time. We also show that our techniques easily extend to the setting where there are arbitrary constraints on the feasible assignment, capturing multi-criteria optimization. We present simulation results that demonstrate that the rounding methods are practical even on large problem instances, with the empirical capacity violation being much better than the theoretical bounds.
Cite as

Santhini K. A., Kamesh Munagala, Meghana Nasre, and Govind S. Sankar. Group Fairness and Multi-Criteria Optimization in School Assignment. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 20:1-20:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{k.a._et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.20,
  author =	{K. A., Santhini and Munagala, Kamesh and Nasre, Meghana and S. Sankar, Govind},
  title =	{{Group Fairness and Multi-Criteria Optimization in School Assignment}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231471},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: School Assignment, Approximation Algorithms, Group Fairness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.41
Residue Domination in Bounded-Treewidth Graphs

Authors: Jakob Greilhuber, Philipp Schepper, and Philip Wellnitz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
For the vertex selection problem (σ,ρ)-DomSet one is given two fixed sets σ and ρ of integers and the task is to decide whether we can select vertices of the input graph such that, for every selected vertex, the number of selected neighbors is in σ and, for every unselected vertex, the number of selected neighbors is in ρ [Telle, Nord. J. Comp. 1994]. This framework covers many fundamental graph problems such as Independent Set and Dominating Set. We significantly extend the recent result by Focke et al. [SODA 2023] to investigate the case when σ and ρ are two (potentially different) residue classes modulo m ≥ 2. We study the problem parameterized by treewidth and present an algorithm that solves in time m^tw ⋅ n^O(1) the decision, minimization and maximization version of the problem. This significantly improves upon the known algorithms where for the case m ≥ 3 not even an explicit running time is known. We complement our algorithm by providing matching lower bounds which state that there is no (m-ε)^pw ⋅ n^O(1)-time algorithm parameterized by pathwidth pw, unless SETH fails. For m = 2, we extend these bounds to the minimization version as the decision version is efficiently solvable.
Cite as

Jakob Greilhuber, Philipp Schepper, and Philip Wellnitz. Residue Domination in Bounded-Treewidth Graphs. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 41:1-41:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{greilhuber_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.41,
  author =	{Greilhuber, Jakob and Schepper, Philipp and Wellnitz, Philip},
  title =	{{Residue Domination in Bounded-Treewidth Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{41:1--41:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.41},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228675},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.41},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized Complexity, Treewidth, Generalized Dominating Set, Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.2
Probabilistic Metric Embedding via Metric Labeling

Authors: Kamesh Munagala, Govind S. Sankar, and Erin Taylor

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 275, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023)

Abstract
We consider probabilistic embedding of metric spaces into ultra-metrics (or equivalently to a constant factor, into hierarchically separated trees) to minimize the expected distortion of any pairwise distance. Such embeddings have been widely used in network design and online algorithms. Our main result is a polynomial time algorithm that approximates the optimal distortion on any instance to within a constant factor. We achieve this via a novel LP formulation that reduces this problem to a probabilistic version of uniform metric labeling.
Cite as

Kamesh Munagala, Govind S. Sankar, and Erin Taylor. Probabilistic Metric Embedding via Metric Labeling. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 275, pp. 2:1-2:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{munagala_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.2,
  author =	{Munagala, Kamesh and Sankar, Govind S. and Taylor, Erin},
  title =	{{Probabilistic Metric Embedding via Metric Labeling}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-296-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{275},
  editor =	{Megow, Nicole and Smith, Adam},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-188279},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Metric Embedding, Approximation Algorithms, Ultrametrics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2022.22
Anti-Factor Is FPT Parameterized by Treewidth and List Size (But Counting Is Hard)

Authors: Dániel Marx, Govind S. Sankar, and Philipp Schepper

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 249, 17th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2022)

Abstract
In the general AntiFactor problem, a graph G and, for every vertex v of G, a set X_v ⊆ ℕ of forbidden degrees is given. The task is to find a set S of edges such that the degree of v in S is not in the set X_v. Standard techniques (dynamic programming plus fast convolution) can be used to show that if M is the largest forbidden degree, then the problem can be solved in time (M+2)^{tw}⋅n^{O(1)} if a tree decomposition of width tw is given. However, significantly faster algorithms are possible if the sets X_v are sparse: our main algorithmic result shows that if every vertex has at most x forbidden degrees (we call this special case AntiFactor_x), then the problem can be solved in time (x+1)^{O(tw)}⋅n^{O(1)}. That is, AntiFactor_x is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by treewidth tw and the maximum number x of excluded degrees. Our algorithm uses the technique of representative sets, which can be generalized to the optimization version, but (as expected) not to the counting version of the problem. In fact, we show that #AntiFactor₁ is already #W[1]-hard parameterized by the width of the given decomposition. Moreover, we show that, unlike for the decision version, the standard dynamic programming algorithm is essentially optimal for the counting version. Formally, for a fixed nonempty set X, we denote by X-AntiFactor the special case where every vertex v has the same set X_v = X of forbidden degrees. We show the following lower bound for every fixed set X: if there is an ε > 0 such that #X-AntiFactor can be solved in time (max X+2-ε)^{tw}⋅n^{O(1)} given a tree decomposition of width tw, then the Counting Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (#SETH) fails.
Cite as

Dániel Marx, Govind S. Sankar, and Philipp Schepper. Anti-Factor Is FPT Parameterized by Treewidth and List Size (But Counting Is Hard). In 17th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 249, pp. 22:1-22:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{marx_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2022.22,
  author =	{Marx, D\'{a}niel and Sankar, Govind S. and Schepper, Philipp},
  title =	{{Anti-Factor Is FPT Parameterized by Treewidth and List Size (But Counting Is Hard)}},
  booktitle =	{17th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2022)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-260-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{249},
  editor =	{Dell, Holger and Nederlof, Jesper},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2022.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-173780},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2022.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Anti-Factor, General Factor, Treewidth, Representative Sets, SETH}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.95
Degrees and Gaps: Tight Complexity Results of General Factor Problems Parameterized by Treewidth and Cutwidth

Authors: Dániel Marx, Govind S. Sankar, and Philipp Schepper

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 198, 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)

Abstract
In the General Factor problem, we are given an undirected graph G and for each vertex v ∈ V(G) a finite set B_v of non-negative integers. The task is to decide if there is a subset S ⊆ E(G) such that deg_S(v) ∈ B_v for all vertices v of G. Define the max-gap of a finite integer set B to be the largest d ≥ 0 such that there is an a ≥ 0 with [a,a+d+1] ∩ B = {a,a+d+1}. Cornuéjols showed in 1988 that if the max-gap of all sets B_v is at most 1, then the decision version of General Factor is polynomial-time solvable. This result was extended 2018 by Dudycz and Paluch for the optimization (i.e. minimization and maximization) versions. We present a general algorithm counting the number of solutions of a certain size in time #2 (M+1)^{tw}^{𝒪(1)}, given a tree decomposition of width tw, where M is the maximum integer over all B_v. By using convolution techniques from van Rooij (2020), we improve upon the previous (M+1)^{3tw}^𝒪(1) time algorithm by Arulselvan et al. from 2018. We prove that this algorithm is essentially optimal for all cases that are not trivial or polynomial time solvable for the decision, minimization or maximization versions. Our lower bounds show that such an improvement is not even possible for B-Factor, which is General Factor on graphs where all sets B_v agree with the fixed set B. We show that for every fixed B where the problem is NP-hard, our (max B+1)^tw^𝒪(1) algorithm cannot be significantly improved: assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), no algorithm can solve B-Factor in time (max B+1-ε)^tw^𝒪(1) for any ε > 0. We extend this bound to the counting version of B-Factor for arbitrary, non-trivial sets B, assuming #SETH. We also investigate the parameterization of the problem by cutwidth. Unlike for treewidth, having a larger set B does not appear to make the problem harder: we give a 2^cutw^𝒪(1) algorithm for any B and provide a matching lower bound that this is optimal for the NP-hard cases.
Cite as

Dániel Marx, Govind S. Sankar, and Philipp Schepper. Degrees and Gaps: Tight Complexity Results of General Factor Problems Parameterized by Treewidth and Cutwidth. In 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 198, pp. 95:1-95:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{marx_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.95,
  author =	{Marx, D\'{a}niel and Sankar, Govind S. and Schepper, Philipp},
  title =	{{Degrees and Gaps: Tight Complexity Results of General Factor Problems Parameterized by Treewidth and Cutwidth}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)},
  pages =	{95:1--95:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-195-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{198},
  editor =	{Bansal, Nikhil and Merelli, Emanuela and Worrell, James},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.95},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-141647},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.95},
  annote =	{Keywords: General Factor, General Matching, Treewidth, Cutwidth}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 9 Document/PDF
  • 6 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 5 2025
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2021

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Marx, Dániel
  • 3 Sankar, Govind S.
  • 3 Schepper, Philipp
  • 2 Munagala, Kamesh
  • 1 Aivasiliotis, Panagiotis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 9 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • 2 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Graph algorithms
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Matchings and factors
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Network flows
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 Treewidth
  • 2 Approximation Algorithms
  • 2 General Factor
  • 2 Parameterized Complexity
  • 1 Anti-Factor
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact