9 Search Results for "Adler, Aviv"


Document
Unlabeled Multi-Robot Motion Planning with Improved Separation Trade-Offs

Authors: Tsuri Farhana, Omrit Filtser, and Shalev Goldshtein

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)


Abstract
We study unlabeled multi-robot motion planning for unit-disk robots in a polygonal environment. Although the problem is hard in general, polynomial-time solutions exist under appropriate separation assumptions on start and target positions. Solovey et al. (RSS'15) provide a near-optimal solution assuming that start/target positions must have pairwise distance at least 4, and at least √5≈2.236 from obstacles. This raises the question of whether polynomial-time algorithms can be obtained in even more densely packed environments. In this paper we present a generalized algorithm that achieve different trade-offs on the robots-separation and obstacles-separation bounds, all significantly improving upon the state of the art. Specifically, we obtain polynomial-time constant-approximation algorithms to minimize the total path length when (i) the robots-separation is 2 2/3 and the obstacles-separation is 1 2/3, or (ii) the robots-separation is ≈3.291 and the obstacles-separation ≈1.354. Additionally, we introduce a different strategy yielding a polynomial-time solution when the robots-separation is only 2, and the obstacles-separation is 3. Finally, we show that without any robots-separation assumption, obstacles-separation of at least 1.5 may be necessary for a solution to exist.

Cite as

Tsuri Farhana, Omrit Filtser, and Shalev Goldshtein. Unlabeled Multi-Robot Motion Planning with Improved Separation Trade-Offs. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 43:1-43:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{farhana_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.43,
  author =	{Farhana, Tsuri and Filtser, Omrit and Goldshtein, Shalev},
  title =	{{Unlabeled Multi-Robot Motion Planning with Improved Separation Trade-Offs}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{43:1--43:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.43},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258495},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.43},
  annote =	{Keywords: multi-robot motion planning}
}
Document
Hexasort - the Complexity of Stacking Colors on Graphs

Authors: Linus Klocker and Simon Dominik Fink

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 366, 13th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2026)


Abstract
Many popular puzzle and matching games have been analyzed through the lens of computational complexity. Prominent examples include Sudoku [Takayuki Yato and Takahiro Seta, 2003], Candy Crush [Luciano Gualà et al., 2014], and Flood-It [Fellows et al., 2018]. A common theme among these widely played games is that their generalized decision versions are NP-hard, which is often thought of as a source of their inherent difficulty and addictive appeal to human players. In this paper, we study a popular single-player stacking game commonly known as Hexasort. The game can be modelled as placing colored stacks onto the vertices of a graph, where adjacent stacks of the same color merge and vanish according to deterministic rules. We prove that Hexasort is NP-hard, even when restricted to single-color stacks and progressively more constrained classes of graphs, culminating in strong NP-hardness on trees of either bounded height or degree. Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms, we identify settings in which the problem becomes polynomial-time solvable and present dynamic programming algorithms.

Cite as

Linus Klocker and Simon Dominik Fink. Hexasort - the Complexity of Stacking Colors on Graphs. In 13th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 366, pp. 26:1-26:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{klocker_et_al:LIPIcs.FUN.2026.26,
  author =	{Klocker, Linus and Fink, Simon Dominik},
  title =	{{Hexasort - the Complexity of Stacking Colors on Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2026)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-417-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{366},
  editor =	{Iacono, John},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2026.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-257457},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2026.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hexasort, offline color stacking on graphs, NP-complete, polynomial-time solvable, dynamic programming}
}
Document
Multidimensional Blockchain Fees Are (Essentially) Optimal

Authors: Guillermo Angeris, Theo Diamandis, and Ciamac Moallemi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)


Abstract
In this paper we show that, using only mild assumptions, dynamic multidimensional blockchain fee markets have strong performance guarantees, even against worst-case adversaries. In particular, we show that the average welfare gap between the following two scenarios is at most O(1/√T), where T is the length of the time horizon considered. In the first scenario, the designer knows all future actions by users and is allowed to fix the optimal prices of resources ahead of time, based on the designer’s oracular knowledge of those actions. In the second, the prices are updated by a very simple algorithm that does not have this oracular knowledge, special cases of which are EIP-4844 and EIP-1559, both fee mechanisms used by the Ethereum blockchain. Roughly speaking, this means that, on average, over a reasonable timescale, there is no difference in welfare between "correctly" fixing the prices, with oracular knowledge of the future, when compared to the proposed algorithm. We show a matching lower bound of Ω(1/√T) for any implementable algorithm and also separately consider the case where the adversary is known to be stochastic.

Cite as

Guillermo Angeris, Theo Diamandis, and Ciamac Moallemi. Multidimensional Blockchain Fees Are (Essentially) Optimal. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 24:1-24:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{angeris_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.24,
  author =	{Angeris, Guillermo and Diamandis, Theo and Moallemi, Ciamac},
  title =	{{Multidimensional Blockchain Fees Are (Essentially) Optimal}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247433},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Blockchains, transaction fees, online optimization, convex optimization}
}
Document
Optimal Motion Planning for Two Square Robots in a Rectilinear Environment

Authors: Pankaj K. Agarwal, Mark de Berg, Benjamin Holmgren, Alex Steiger, and Martijn Struijs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 332, 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)


Abstract
Let W ⊂ ℝ² be a rectilinear polygonal environment (that is, a rectilinear polygon potentially with holes) with a total of n vertices, and let A,B be two robots, each modeled as an axis-aligned unit square, that can move rectilinearly inside W. The goal is to compute an optimal collision-free motion plan π for A and B between a given pair of source and target configurations. We study two variants of this problem and obtain the following results. - Min-Sum: Here the goal is to compute a motion plan that minimizes the sum of the lengths of the paths of the robots. We present an O(n⁴log n)-time algorithm for computing an optimal solution to the min-sum problem. This is the first polynomial-time algorithm to compute an optimal, collision-free motion of two robots amid obstacles in a planar polygonal environment. - Min-Makespan: Here the robots can move with at most unit speed, and the goal is to compute a motion plan that minimizes the maximum time taken by a robot to reach its target location. We prove that the min-makespan variant is NP-hard.

Cite as

Pankaj K. Agarwal, Mark de Berg, Benjamin Holmgren, Alex Steiger, and Martijn Struijs. Optimal Motion Planning for Two Square Robots in a Rectilinear Environment. In 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 332, pp. 5:1-5:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{agarwal_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.5,
  author =	{Agarwal, Pankaj K. and de Berg, Mark and Holmgren, Benjamin and Steiger, Alex and Struijs, Martijn},
  title =	{{Optimal Motion Planning for Two Square Robots in a Rectilinear Environment}},
  booktitle =	{41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-370-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{332},
  editor =	{Aichholzer, Oswin and Wang, Haitao},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231577},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational geometry, motion planning, multiple robots, rectilinear paths}
}
Document
Reconfiguration of Unit Squares and Disks: PSPACE-Hardness in Simple Settings

Authors: Mikkel Abrahamsen, Kevin Buchin, Maike Buchin, Linda Kleist, Maarten Löffler, Lena Schlipf, André Schulz, and Jack Stade

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 332, 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)


Abstract
We study well-known reconfiguration problems. Given a start and a target configuration of geometric objects in a polygon, we wonder whether we can move the objects from the start configuration to the target configuration while avoiding collisions between the objects and staying within the polygon. Problems of this type have been considered since the early 80s by roboticists and computational geometers. In this paper, we study some of the simplest possible variants where the objects are labeled or unlabeled unit squares or unit disks. In unlabeled reconfiguration, the objects are identical, so that any object is allowed to end at any of the targets positions. In the labeled variant, each object has a designated target position. The results for the labeled variants are direct consequences from our insights on the unlabeled versions. We show that it is PSPACE-hard to decide whether there exists a reconfiguration of (unlabeled/labeled) unit squares even in a simple polygon. Previously, it was only known to be PSPACE-hard in a polygon with holes for both the unlabeled and labeled version [Solovey and Halperin, Int. J. Robotics Res. 2016]. Our proof is based on a result of independent interest, namely that reconfiguration between two satisfying assignments of a formula of Monotone-Planar-3-Sat is also PSPACE-complete. The reduction from reconfiguration of Monotone-Planar-3-Sat to reconfiguration of unit squares extends techniques recently developed to show NP-hardness of packing unit squares in a simple polygon [Abrahamsen and Stade, FOCS 2024]. We also show PSPACE-hardness of reconfiguration of (unlabeled/labeled) unit disks in a polygon with holes. Previously, it was known that unlabeled reconfiguration of disks of two different sizes was PSPACE-hard [Brocken, van der Heijden, Kostitsyna, Lo-Wong and Surtel, FUN 2021].

Cite as

Mikkel Abrahamsen, Kevin Buchin, Maike Buchin, Linda Kleist, Maarten Löffler, Lena Schlipf, André Schulz, and Jack Stade. Reconfiguration of Unit Squares and Disks: PSPACE-Hardness in Simple Settings. In 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 332, pp. 1:1-1:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{abrahamsen_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.1,
  author =	{Abrahamsen, Mikkel and Buchin, Kevin and Buchin, Maike and Kleist, Linda and L\"{o}ffler, Maarten and Schlipf, Lena and Schulz, Andr\'{e} and Stade, Jack},
  title =	{{Reconfiguration of Unit Squares and Disks: PSPACE-Hardness in Simple Settings}},
  booktitle =	{41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-370-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{332},
  editor =	{Aichholzer, Oswin and Wang, Haitao},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231539},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: reconfiguration, unit square, unit disk, unlabeled, labeled, simple polygon, polygon}
}
Document
Extracting Dual Solutions via Primal Optimizers

Authors: Yair Carmon, Arun Jambulapati, Liam O'Carroll, and Aaron Sidford

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)


Abstract
We provide a general method to convert a "primal" black-box algorithm for solving regularized convex-concave minimax optimization problems into an algorithm for solving the associated dual maximin optimization problem. Our method adds recursive regularization over a logarithmic number of rounds where each round consists of an approximate regularized primal optimization followed by the computation of a dual best response. We apply this result to obtain new state-of-the-art runtimes for solving matrix games in specific parameter regimes, obtain improved query complexity for solving the dual of the CVaR distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problem, and recover the optimal query complexity for finding a stationary point of a convex function.

Cite as

Yair Carmon, Arun Jambulapati, Liam O'Carroll, and Aaron Sidford. Extracting Dual Solutions via Primal Optimizers. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 29:1-29:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carmon_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.29,
  author =	{Carmon, Yair and Jambulapati, Arun and O'Carroll, Liam and Sidford, Aaron},
  title =	{{Extracting Dual Solutions via Primal Optimizers}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226578},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Minimax optimization, black-box optimization, matrix games, distributionally robust optimization}
}
Document
Skiing Is Easy, Gymnastics Is Hard: Complexity of Routine Construction in Olympic Sports

Authors: James Koppel and Yun William Yu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 226, 11th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2022)


Abstract
Some Olympic sports, like the marathon, are purely feats of human athleticism. But in others such as gymnastics, athletes channel their athleticism into a routine of skills. In these disciplines, designing the highest-scoring routine can be a challenging problem, because the routines are judged via a combination of artistic merit, which is largely subjective, and technical difficulty, which comes with complicated but objective scoring rules. Notably, since the 2006 Code of Points, FIG (International Gymnastics Federation) has sought to make gymnastics scoring more objective by encoding more of the score in those objective technical side of scoring, and in this paper, we show how that push is reflected in the computational complexity of routine optimization. Here, we analyze the purely-technical component of the scoring rules of routines in 17 different events across 5 Olympic sports. We identify four attributes that classify the common rules found in scoring functions, and, for each combination of attributes, prove hardness results or provide algorithms for designing the highest-scoring routine according to the objective technical component of the scoring functions. Ultimately, we discover that optimal routine construction for events in artistic, rhythmic, and trampoline gymnastics is NP-hard, while optimal routine construction for all other sports is in P.

Cite as

James Koppel and Yun William Yu. Skiing Is Easy, Gymnastics Is Hard: Complexity of Routine Construction in Olympic Sports. In 11th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 226, pp. 17:1-17:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koppel_et_al:LIPIcs.FUN.2022.17,
  author =	{Koppel, James and Yu, Yun William},
  title =	{{Skiing Is Easy, Gymnastics Is Hard: Complexity of Routine Construction in Olympic Sports}},
  booktitle =	{11th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2022)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-232-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{226},
  editor =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre and Uno, Yushi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2022.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-159877},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2022.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: complexity, games, sports}
}
Document
Tatamibari Is NP-Complete

Authors: Aviv Adler, Jeffrey Bosboom, Erik D. Demaine, Martin L. Demaine, Quanquan C. Liu, and Jayson Lynch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 157, 10th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2021) (2020)


Abstract
In the Nikoli pencil-and-paper game Tatamibari, a puzzle consists of an m x n grid of cells, where each cell possibly contains a clue among ⊞, ⊟, ◫. The goal is to partition the grid into disjoint rectangles, where every rectangle contains exactly one clue, rectangles containing ⊞ are square, rectangles containing ⊟ are strictly longer horizontally than vertically, rectangles containing ◫ are strictly longer vertically than horizontally, and no four rectangles share a corner. We prove this puzzle NP-complete, establishing a Nikoli gap of 16 years. Along the way, we introduce a gadget framework for proving hardness of similar puzzles involving area coverage, and show that it applies to an existing NP-hardness proof for Spiral Galaxies. We also present a mathematical puzzle font for Tatamibari.

Cite as

Aviv Adler, Jeffrey Bosboom, Erik D. Demaine, Martin L. Demaine, Quanquan C. Liu, and Jayson Lynch. Tatamibari Is NP-Complete. In 10th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 157, pp. 1:1-1:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{adler_et_al:LIPIcs.FUN.2021.1,
  author =	{Adler, Aviv and Bosboom, Jeffrey and Demaine, Erik D. and Demaine, Martin L. and Liu, Quanquan C. and Lynch, Jayson},
  title =	{{Tatamibari Is NP-Complete}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2021)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-145-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{157},
  editor =	{Farach-Colton, Martin and Prencipe, Giuseppe and Uehara, Ryuhei},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2021.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-127624},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2021.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Nikoli puzzles, NP-hardness, rectangle covering}
}
Document
The Complexity of Hex and the Jordan Curve Theorem

Authors: Aviv Adler, Constantinos Daskalakis, and Erik D. Demaine

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)


Abstract
The Jordan curve theorem and Brouwer's fixed-point theorem are fundamental problems in topology. We study their computational relationship, showing that a stylized computational version of Jordan’s theorem is PPAD-complete, and therefore in a sense computationally equivalent to Brouwer’s theorem. As a corollary, our computational result implies that these two theorems directly imply each other mathematically, complementing Maehara's proof that Brouwer implies Jordan [Maehara, 1984]. We then turn to the combinatorial game of Hex which is related to Jordan's theorem, and where the existence of a winner can be used to show Brouwer's theorem [Gale,1979]. We establish that determining who won an (implicitly encoded) play of Hex is PSPACE-complete by adapting a reduction (due to Goldberg [Goldberg,2015]) from Quantified Boolean Formula (QBF). As this problem is analogous to evaluating the output of a canonical path-following algorithm for finding a Brouwer fixed point - and which is known to be PSPACE-complete [Goldberg/Papadimitriou/Savani, 2013] - we thereby establish a connection between Brouwer, Jordan and Hex higher in the complexity hierarchy.

Cite as

Aviv Adler, Constantinos Daskalakis, and Erik D. Demaine. The Complexity of Hex and the Jordan Curve Theorem. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 24:1-24:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{adler_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.24,
  author =	{Adler, Aviv and Daskalakis, Constantinos and Demaine, Erik D.},
  title =	{{The Complexity of Hex and the Jordan Curve Theorem}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-63032},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Jordan, Brouwer, Hex, PPAD, PSPACE}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 9 Document/PDF
  • 6 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2016

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Adler, Aviv
  • 2 Demaine, Erik D.
  • 1 Abrahamsen, Mikkel
  • 1 Agarwal, Pankaj K.
  • 1 Angeris, Guillermo
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 9 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • 2 Theory of computation → Computational geometry
  • 1 Information systems → Digital cash
  • 1 Theory of computation
  • 1 Theory of computation → Algorithmic mechanism design
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Blockchains
  • 1 Brouwer
  • 1 Computational geometry
  • 1 Hex
  • 1 Hexasort
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail