27 Search Results for "Kaposi, Ambrus"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 104

23rd International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2017)

TYPES 2017, May 29 to June 1, 2017, Budapest, Hungary

Editors: Andreas Abel, Fredrik Nordvall Forsberg, and Ambrus Kaposi

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40
The Groupoid-Syntax of Type Theory Is a Set

Authors: Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, and Szumi Xie

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Categories with families (CwFs) have been used to define the semantics of type theory in type theory. In the setting of Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT), one of the limitations of the traditional notion of CwFs is the requirement to set-truncate types, which excludes models based on univalent categories, such as the standard set model. To address this limitation, we introduce the concept of a Groupoid Category with Families (GCwF). This framework truncates types at the groupoid level and incorporates coherence equations, providing a natural extension of the CwF framework when starting from a 1-category. We demonstrate that the initial GCwF for a type theory with a base family of sets and Π-types (groupoid-syntax) is set-truncated. Consequently, this allows us to utilize the conventional intrinsic syntax of type theory while enabling interpretations in semantically richer and more natural models. All constructions in this paper were formalised in Cubical Agda.
Cite as

Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, and Szumi Xie. The Groupoid-Syntax of Type Theory Is a Set. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 40:1-40:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{altenkirch_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40,
  author =	{Altenkirch, Thorsten and Kaposi, Ambrus and Xie, Szumi},
  title =	{{The Groupoid-Syntax of Type Theory Is a Set}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{40:1--40:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254650},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40},
  annote =	{Keywords: Categorical models of type theory, category with families, groupoids, coherence, homotopy type theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.38
The Biequivalence of Path Categories and Axiomatic Martin-Löf Type Theories

Authors: Daniël Otten and Matteo Spadetto

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
The semantics of extensional type theory has an elegant categorical description: models of extensional =-types, 𝟙-types, and Σ-types are biequivalent to finitely complete categories, while adding Π-types yields locally Cartesian closed categories. We establish parallel results for axiomatic type theory, which includes systems like cubical type theory, where the computation rule of the =-types only holds as a propositional axiom instead of a definitional reduction. In particular, we prove that models of axiomatic =-types, and standard 𝟙- and Σ-types are biequivalent to certain path categories, while adding axiomatic Π-types yields dependent homotopy exponents. This biequivalence simplifies axiomatic =-types, which are more intricate than extensional ones since they permit higher dimensional structure. Specifically, path categories use a primitive notion of equivalence instead of a direct reproduction of the syntactic elimination rules and computation axioms. We apply our correspondence to prove a coherence theorem: we show that these weak homotopical models can be turned into equivalent strict models of axiomatic type theory. In addition, we introduce a more modular notion, that of a display map path category, which only models axiomatic =-types by default, while leaving room to add other axiomatic type formers such as 𝟙-, Σ-, and Π-types.
Cite as

Daniël Otten and Matteo Spadetto. The Biequivalence of Path Categories and Axiomatic Martin-Löf Type Theories. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 38:1-38:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{otten_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.38,
  author =	{Otten, Dani\"{e}l and Spadetto, Matteo},
  title =	{{The Biequivalence of Path Categories and Axiomatic Martin-L\"{o}f Type Theories}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254633},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: Axiomatic type theory, cubical type theory, propositional equality, biequivalence, display map categories, path categories, homotopy theory, coherence}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.8
Abstract, Compositional Consistency: Isabelle/HOL Locales for Completeness à la Fitting

Authors: Asta Halkjær From and Anders Schlichtkrull

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Smullyan and Fitting have used abstract consistency properties to great effect in unifying meta-theoretical results in logic. In this paper, we generalize these developments with the help of Isabelle/HOL. We use locales to decompose abstract consistency into general parts, and provide the textbook variants as special cases. Users can assemble their own consistency property for a given logic. The compositionality alleviates the absence of dependent types in Isabelle/HOL. We use our development to mechanize completeness of calculi for three logics: (1) first-order logic where we only instantiate universal quantifiers with already occurring terms, (2) second-order logic over general models, and (3) a recently developed strong hybrid logic with propositional quantification.
Cite as

Asta Halkjær From and Anders Schlichtkrull. Abstract, Compositional Consistency: Isabelle/HOL Locales for Completeness à la Fitting. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 8:1-8:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{from_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.8,
  author =	{From, Asta Halkj{\ae}r and Schlichtkrull, Anders},
  title =	{{Abstract, Compositional Consistency: Isabelle/HOL Locales for Completeness \`{a} la Fitting}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246406},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Logic, completeness, abstract consistency property, Isabelle/HOL, locales}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33
Scott’s Representation Theorem and the Univalent Karoubi Envelope

Authors: Arnoud van der Leer, Kobe Wullaert, and Benedikt Ahrens

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Lambek and Scott constructed a correspondence between simply-typed lambda calculi and Cartesian closed categories. Scott’s Representation Theorem is a cousin to this result for untyped lambda calculi. It states that every untyped lambda calculus arises from a reflexive object in some category. We present a formalization of Scott’s Representation Theorem in univalent foundations, in the (Rocq-)UniMath library. Specifically, we implement two proofs of that theorem, one by Scott and one by Hyland. We also explain the role of the Karoubi envelope - a categorical construction - in the proofs and the impact the chosen foundation has on this construction. Finally, we report on some automation we have implemented for the reduction of λ-terms.
Cite as

Arnoud van der Leer, Kobe Wullaert, and Benedikt Ahrens. Scott’s Representation Theorem and the Univalent Karoubi Envelope. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 33:1-33:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vanderleer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33,
  author =	{van der Leer, Arnoud and Wullaert, Kobe and Ahrens, Benedikt},
  title =	{{Scott’s Representation Theorem and the Univalent Karoubi Envelope}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246318},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculi, algebraic theories, categorical semantics, Karoubi envelope, formalization, Rocq-UniMath, univalent foundations}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22
Formalizing Splitting in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Ghilain Bergeron, Florent Krasnopol, and Sophie Tourret

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We describe the formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a framework for splitting, a theorem proving technique that extends saturation-based calculi with branching abilities. The framework preserves the completeness of the original calculus. We focus here on the simplest splitting model and provide an extension of the ordered resolution calculus with a variant of splitting called Lightweight AVATAR.
Cite as

Ghilain Bergeron, Florent Krasnopol, and Sophie Tourret. Formalizing Splitting in Isabelle/HOL. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 22:1-22:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bergeron_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22,
  author =	{Bergeron, Ghilain and Krasnopol, Florent and Tourret, Sophie},
  title =	{{Formalizing Splitting in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246208},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle/HOL, saturation-based calculi, splitting}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27
What Does It Take to Certify a Conversion Checker?

Authors: Meven Lennon-Bertrand

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We report on a detailed exploration of the properties of conversion (definitional equality) in dependent type theory, with the goal of certifying decision procedures for it. While in that context the property of normalisation has attracted the most light, we instead emphasize the importance of injectivity properties, showing that they alone are both crucial and sufficient to certify most desirable properties of conversion checkers. We also explore the certification of a fully untyped conversion checker, with respect to a typed specification, and show that the story is mostly unchanged, although the exact injectivity properties needed are subtly different.
Cite as

Meven Lennon-Bertrand. What Does It Take to Certify a Conversion Checker?. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 27:1-27:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lennonbertrand:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27,
  author =	{Lennon-Bertrand, Meven},
  title =	{{What Does It Take to Certify a Conversion Checker?}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236428},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dependent types, Bidirectional typing, Certified software}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.10
Second-Order Generalised Algebraic Theories: Signatures and First-Order Semantics

Authors: Ambrus Kaposi and Szumi Xie

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 299, 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)

Abstract
Programming languages can be defined from the concrete to the abstract by abstract syntax trees, well-scoped syntax, well-typed (intrinsic) syntax, algebraic syntax (well-typed syntax quotiented by conversion). Another aspect is the representation of binding structure for which nominal approaches, De Bruijn indices/levels and higher order abstract syntax (HOAS) are available. In HOAS, binders are given by the function space of an internal language of presheaves. In this paper, we show how to combine the algebraic approach with the HOAS approach: following Uemura, we define languages as second-order generalised algebraic theories (SOGATs). Through a series of examples we show that non-substructural languages can be naturally defined as SOGATs. We give a formal definition of SOGAT signatures (using the syntax of a particular SOGAT) and define two translations from SOGAT signatures to GAT signatures (signatures for quotient inductive-inductive types), based on parallel and single substitutions, respectively.
Cite as

Ambrus Kaposi and Szumi Xie. Second-Order Generalised Algebraic Theories: Signatures and First-Order Semantics. In 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 299, pp. 10:1-10:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kaposi_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.10,
  author =	{Kaposi, Ambrus and Xie, Szumi},
  title =	{{Second-Order Generalised Algebraic Theories: Signatures and First-Order Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-323-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{299},
  editor =	{Rehof, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203396},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Type theory, universal algebra, inductive types, quotient inductive types, higher-order abstract syntax, logical framework}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2022.10
The Münchhausen Method in Type Theory

Authors: Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, Artjoms Šinkarovs, and Tamás Végh

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 269, 28th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2022)

Abstract
In one of his long tales, after falling into a swamp, Baron Münchhausen salvaged himself and the horse by lifting them both up by his hair. Inspired by this, the paper presents a technique to justify very dependent types. Such types reference the term that they classify, e.g. x : F x. While in most type theories this is not allowed, we propose a technique on salvaging the meaning of both the term and the type. The proposed technique does not refer to preterms or typing relations and works in a completely algebraic setting, e.g categories with families. With a series of examples we demonstrate our technique. We use Agda to demonstrate that our examples are implementable within a proof assistant.
Cite as

Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, Artjoms Šinkarovs, and Tamás Végh. The Münchhausen Method in Type Theory. In 28th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 269, pp. 10:1-10:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{altenkirch_et_al:LIPIcs.TYPES.2022.10,
  author =	{Altenkirch, Thorsten and Kaposi, Ambrus and \v{S}inkarovs, Artjoms and V\'{e}gh, Tam\'{a}s},
  title =	{{The M\"{u}nchhausen Method in Type Theory}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2022)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-285-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{269},
  editor =	{Kesner, Delia and P\'{e}drot, Pierre-Marie},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2022.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-184534},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2022.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: type theory, proof assistants, very dependent types}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.18
For the Metatheory of Type Theory, Internal Sconing Is Enough

Authors: Rafaël Bocquet, Ambrus Kaposi, and Christian Sattler

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 260, 8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023)

Abstract
Metatheorems about type theories are often proven by interpreting the syntax into models constructed using categorical gluing. We propose to use only sconing (gluing along a global section functor) instead of general gluing. The sconing is performed internally to a presheaf category, and we recover the original glued model by externalization. Our method relies on constructions involving two notions of models: first-order models (with explicit contexts) and higher-order models (without explicit contexts). Sconing turns a displayed higher-order model into a displayed first-order model. Using these, we derive specialized induction principles for the syntax of type theory. The input of such an induction principle is a boilerplate-free description of its motives and methods, not mentioning contexts. The output is a section with computation rules specified in the same internal language. We illustrate our framework by proofs of canonicity and normalization for type theory.
Cite as

Rafaël Bocquet, Ambrus Kaposi, and Christian Sattler. For the Metatheory of Type Theory, Internal Sconing Is Enough. In 8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 260, pp. 18:1-18:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bocquet_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.18,
  author =	{Bocquet, Rafa\"{e}l and Kaposi, Ambrus and Sattler, Christian},
  title =	{{For the Metatheory of Type Theory, Internal Sconing Is Enough}},
  booktitle =	{8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-277-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{260},
  editor =	{Gaboardi, Marco and van Raamsdonk, Femke},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-180029},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: type theory, presheaves, canonicity, normalization, sconing, gluing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.24
Combinatory Logic and Lambda Calculus Are Equal, Algebraically

Authors: Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, Artjoms Šinkarovs, and Tamás Végh

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 260, 8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023)

Abstract
It is well-known that extensional lambda calculus is equivalent to extensional combinatory logic. In this paper we describe a formalisation of this fact in Cubical Agda. The distinguishing features of our formalisation are the following: (i) Both languages are defined as generalised algebraic theories, the syntaxes are intrinsically typed and quotiented by conversion; we never mention preterms or break the quotients in our construction. (ii) Typing is a parameter, thus the un(i)typed and simply typed variants are special cases of the same proof. (iii) We define syntaxes as quotient inductive-inductive types (QIITs) in Cubical Agda; we prove the equivalence and (via univalence) the equality of these QIITs; we do not rely on any axioms, the conversion functions all compute and can be experimented with.
Cite as

Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, Artjoms Šinkarovs, and Tamás Végh. Combinatory Logic and Lambda Calculus Are Equal, Algebraically. In 8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 260, pp. 24:1-24:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{altenkirch_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.24,
  author =	{Altenkirch, Thorsten and Kaposi, Ambrus and \v{S}inkarovs, Artjoms and V\'{e}gh, Tam\'{a}s},
  title =	{{Combinatory Logic and Lambda Calculus Are Equal, Algebraically}},
  booktitle =	{8th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2023)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-277-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{260},
  editor =	{Gaboardi, Marco and van Raamsdonk, Femke},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-180086},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Combinatory logic, lambda calculus, quotient inductive types, Cubical Agda}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2021.6
Internal Strict Propositions Using Point-Free Equations

Authors: István Donkó and Ambrus Kaposi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 239, 27th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2021)

Abstract
The setoid model of Martin-Löf’s type theory bootstraps extensional features of type theory from intensional type theory equipped with a universe of definitionally proof irrelevant (strict) propositions. Extensional features include a Prop-valued identity type with a strong transport rule and function extensionality. We show that a setoid model supporting these features can be defined in intensional type theory without any of these features. The key component is a point-free notion of propositions. Our construction suggests that strict algebraic structures can be defined along the same lines in intensional type theory.
Cite as

István Donkó and Ambrus Kaposi. Internal Strict Propositions Using Point-Free Equations. In 27th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 239, pp. 6:1-6:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{donko_et_al:LIPIcs.TYPES.2021.6,
  author =	{Donk\'{o}, Istv\'{a}n and Kaposi, Ambrus},
  title =	{{Internal Strict Propositions Using Point-Free Equations}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2021)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-254-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{239},
  editor =	{Basold, Henning and Cockx, Jesper and Ghilezan, Silvia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2021.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-167759},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2021.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Martin-L\"{o}f’s type theory, intensional type theory, function extensionality, setoid model, homotopy type theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2019.6
For Finitary Induction-Induction, Induction Is Enough

Authors: Ambrus Kaposi, András Kovács, and Ambroise Lafont

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 175, 25th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2019)

Abstract
Inductive-inductive types (IITs) are a generalisation of inductive types in type theory. They allow the mutual definition of types with multiple sorts where later sorts can be indexed by previous ones. An example is the Chapman-style syntax of type theory with conversion relations for each sort where e.g. the sort of types is indexed by contexts. In this paper we show that if a model of extensional type theory (ETT) supports indexed W-types, then it supports finitely branching IITs. We use a small internal type theory called the theory of signatures to specify IITs. We show that if a model of ETT supports the syntax for the theory of signatures, then it supports all IITs. We construct this syntax from indexed W-types using preterms and typing relations and prove its initiality following Streicher. The construction of the syntax and its initiality proof were formalised in Agda.
Cite as

Ambrus Kaposi, András Kovács, and Ambroise Lafont. For Finitary Induction-Induction, Induction Is Enough. In 25th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 175, pp. 6:1-6:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kaposi_et_al:LIPIcs.TYPES.2019.6,
  author =	{Kaposi, Ambrus and Kov\'{a}cs, Andr\'{a}s and Lafont, Ambroise},
  title =	{{For Finitary Induction-Induction, Induction Is Enough}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2019)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-158-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{175},
  editor =	{Bezem, Marc and Mahboubi, Assia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2019.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-130707},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2019.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: type theory, inductive types, inductive-inductive types}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.23
A Syntax for Mutual Inductive Families

Authors: Ambrus Kaposi and Jakob von Raumer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)

Abstract
Inductive families of types are a feature of most languages based on dependent types. They are usually described either by syntactic schemes or by encodings of strictly positive functors such as combinator languages or containers. The former approaches are informal and give only external signatures, the latter approaches suffer from encoding overheads and do not directly represent mutual types. In this paper we propose a direct method for describing signatures for mutual inductive families using a domain-specific type theory. A signature is a context (roughly speaking, a list of types) in this small type theory. Algebras, displayed algebras and sections are defined by models of this type theory: the standard model, the logical predicate and a logical relation interpretation, respectively. We reduce the existence of initial algebras for these signatures to the existence of the syntax of our domain-specific type theory. As this theory is very simple, its normal syntax can be encoded using indexed W-types. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first formalisation of the folklore fact that mutual inductive types can be reduced to indexed W-types. The contents of this paper were formalised in the proof assistant Agda.
Cite as

Ambrus Kaposi and Jakob von Raumer. A Syntax for Mutual Inductive Families. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 23:1-23:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kaposi_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.23,
  author =	{Kaposi, Ambrus and von Raumer, Jakob},
  title =	{{A Syntax for Mutual Inductive Families}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123451},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: type theory, inductive types, mutual inductive types, W-types, Agda}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.25
Gluing for Type Theory

Authors: Ambrus Kaposi, Simon Huber, and Christian Sattler

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 131, 4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019)

Abstract
The relationship between categorical gluing and proofs using the logical relation technique is folklore. In this paper we work out this relationship for Martin-Löf type theory and show that parametricity and canonicity arise as special cases of gluing. The input of gluing is two models of type theory and a pseudomorphism between them and the output is a displayed model over the first model. A pseudomorphism preserves the categorical structure strictly, the empty context and context extension up to isomorphism, and there are no conditions on preservation of type formers. We look at three examples of pseudomorphisms: the identity on the syntax, the interpretation into the set model and the global section functor. Gluing along these result in syntactic parametricity, semantic parametricity and canonicity, respectively.
Cite as

Ambrus Kaposi, Simon Huber, and Christian Sattler. Gluing for Type Theory. In 4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 131, pp. 25:1-25:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kaposi_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.25,
  author =	{Kaposi, Ambrus and Huber, Simon and Sattler, Christian},
  title =	{{Gluing for Type Theory}},
  booktitle =	{4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-107-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{131},
  editor =	{Geuvers, Herman},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-105323},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: Martin-L\"{o}f type theory, logical relations, parametricity, canonicity, quotient inductive types}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 26 Document/PDF
  • 6 Document/HTML
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 3 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 14 Kaposi, Ambrus
  • 5 Altenkirch, Thorsten
  • 2 Abel, Andreas
  • 2 Kovács, András
  • 2 Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 26 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 16 Theory of computation → Type theory
  • 4 Theory of computation → Proof theory
  • 2 Theory of computation → Type structures
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Theorem proving algorithms
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Topology
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 6 type theory
  • 5 homotopy type theory
  • 4 quotient inductive types
  • 3 Agda
  • 3 inductive types
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact