6 Search Results for "Ringer, Talia"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.12
Automatically Generalizing Proofs and Statements

Authors: Anshula Gandhi, Anand Rao Tadipatri, and Timothy Gowers

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We present an algorithm, developed in the Lean programming language, to automatically generalize mathematical proofs. The algorithm, which builds on work by Olivier Pons, advances state-of-the-art proof generalization by robustly generalizing repeated and related constants, as well as abstracting out hypotheses implicitly concerning them. We also discuss the role of proof generalization in conjecturing, learning from failure, and other aspects of mathematical proof discovery.
Cite as

Anshula Gandhi, Anand Rao Tadipatri, and Timothy Gowers. Automatically Generalizing Proofs and Statements. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 12:1-12:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gandhi_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.12,
  author =	{Gandhi, Anshula and Tadipatri, Anand Rao and Gowers, Timothy},
  title =	{{Automatically Generalizing Proofs and Statements}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246104},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: automated reasoning, automated theorem proving, interactive theorem proving, formalization of mathematics, generalization, Lean theorem prover, Lean tactic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12
Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq

Authors: Ali Ghanbari

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Proof engineering in Rocq is a labor-intensive process, and as proof developments grow in size, redundancy and maintainability become challenges. One such redundancy is goal cloning, i.e., proving α-equivalent goals multiple times, leading to wasted effort and bloated proof scripts. In this paper, we introduce clone-finder, a novel technique for detecting goal clones in Rocq proofs. By leveraging the formal notion of α-equivalence for Gallina terms, clone-finder systematically identifies duplicated proof goals across large Rocq codebases. We evaluate clone-finder on 40 real-world Rocq projects from the CoqGym dataset. Our results reveal that each project contains an average of 27.73 instances of goal clone. We observed that the clones can be categorized as either exact goal duplication, generalization, or α-equivalent goals with different proofs, each signifying varying levels duplicate effort. Our findings highlight significant untapped potential for proof reuse in Rocq-based formal verification projects, paving the way for future improvements in automated proof engineering.
Cite as

Ali Ghanbari. Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 12:1-12:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ghanbari:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12,
  author =	{Ghanbari, Ali},
  title =	{{Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233055},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Clone Detection, Goal, Proof, Rocq, Gallina}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.11
Formally Specifying Contract Optimizations with Bisimulations in Coq

Authors: Derek Sorensen

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 129, 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)

Abstract
The efficacy of formal verification of smart contracts depends on being able to correctly specify and carry out the verification of optimized code. However, code optimized for performance is rarely optimized for intelligibility, which can make formally verifying optimized code difficult and costly. To address this issue, we present a formal tool for reasoning about an optimized contract in terms of its reference implementation. This tool reduces the work of formally verifying an optimized contract to proving behavioral equivalence to the reference implementation.
Cite as

Derek Sorensen. Formally Specifying Contract Optimizations with Bisimulations in Coq. In 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 129, pp. 11:1-11:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sorensen:OASIcs.FMBC.2025.11,
  author =	{Sorensen, Derek},
  title =	{{Formally Specifying Contract Optimizations with Bisimulations in Coq}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:13},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-371-3},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{129},
  editor =	{Marmsoler, Diego and Xu, Meng},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230382},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: smart contract verification, formal methods, interactive theorem prover, smart contract upgradeability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33
Correctly Compiling Proofs About Programs Without Proving Compilers Correct

Authors: Audrey Seo, Christopher Lam, Dan Grossman, and Talia Ringer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract
Guaranteeing correct compilation is nearly synonymous with compiler verification. However, the correctness guarantees for certified compilers and translation validation can be stronger than we need. While many compilers do have incorrect behavior, even when a compiler bug occurs it may not change the program’s behavior meaningfully with respect to its specification. Many real-world specifications are necessarily partial in that they do not completely specify all of a program’s behavior. While compiler verification and formal methods have had great success for safety-critical systems, there are magnitudes more code, such as math libraries, compiled with incorrect compilers, that would benefit from a guarantee of its partial specification. This paper explores a technique to get guarantees about compiled programs even in the presence of an unverified, or even incorrect, compiler. Our workflow compiles programs, specifications, and proof objects, from an embedded source language and logic to an embedded target language and logic. We implement two simple imperative languages, each with its own Hoare-style program logic, and a system for instantiating proof compilers out of compilers between these two languages that fulfill certain equational conditions in Coq. We instantiate our system on four compilers: one that is incomplete, two that are incorrect, and one that is correct but unverified. We use these instances to compile Hoare proofs for several programs, and we are able to leverage compiled proofs to assist in proofs of larger programs. Our proof compiler system is formally proven sound in Coq. We demonstrate how our approach enables strong target program guarantees even in the presence of incorrect compilation, opening up new options for which proof burdens one might shoulder instead of, or in addition to, compiler correctness.
Cite as

Audrey Seo, Christopher Lam, Dan Grossman, and Talia Ringer. Correctly Compiling Proofs About Programs Without Proving Compilers Correct. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 33:1-33:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{seo_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33,
  author =	{Seo, Audrey and Lam, Christopher and Grossman, Dan and Ringer, Talia},
  title =	{{Correctly Compiling Proofs About Programs Without Proving Compilers Correct}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207612},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof transformations, compiler validation, program logics, proof engineering}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.26
Proof Repair Infrastructure for Supervised Models: Building a Large Proof Repair Dataset

Authors: Tom Reichel, R. Wesley Henderson, Andrew Touchet, Andrew Gardner, and Talia Ringer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 268, 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)

Abstract
We report on our efforts building a new, large proof-repair dataset and benchmark suite for the Coq proof assistant. The dataset is made up of Git commits from open-source projects with old and new versions of definitions and proofs aligned across commits. Building this dataset has been a significant undertaking, highlighting a number of challenges and gaps in existing infrastructure. We discuss these challenges and gaps, and we provide recommendations for how the proof assistant community can address them. Our hope is to make it easier to build datasets and benchmark suites so that machine-learning tools for proofs will move to target the tasks that matter most and do so equitably across proof assistants.
Cite as

Tom Reichel, R. Wesley Henderson, Andrew Touchet, Andrew Gardner, and Talia Ringer. Proof Repair Infrastructure for Supervised Models: Building a Large Proof Repair Dataset. In 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 268, pp. 26:1-26:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{reichel_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2023.26,
  author =	{Reichel, Tom and Henderson, R. Wesley and Touchet, Andrew and Gardner, Andrew and Ringer, Talia},
  title =	{{Proof Repair Infrastructure for Supervised Models: Building a Large Proof Repair Dataset}},
  booktitle =	{14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-284-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{268},
  editor =	{Naumowicz, Adam and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-184013},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof repair, datasets, benchmarks, machine learning, formal proof}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.26
Ornaments for Proof Reuse in Coq

Authors: Talia Ringer, Nathaniel Yazdani, John Leo, and Dan Grossman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 141, 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)

Abstract
Ornaments express relations between inductive types with the same inductive structure. We implement fully automatic proof reuse for a particular class of ornaments in a Coq plugin, and show how such a tool can give programmers the rewards of using indexed inductive types while automating away many of the costs. The plugin works directly on Coq code; it is the first ornamentation tool for a non-embedded dependently typed language. It is also the first tool to automatically identify ornaments: To lift a function or proof, the user must provide only the source type, the destination type, and the source function or proof. In taking advantage of the mathematical properties of ornaments, our approach produces faster functions and smaller terms than a more general approach to proof reuse in Coq.
Cite as

Talia Ringer, Nathaniel Yazdani, John Leo, and Dan Grossman. Ornaments for Proof Reuse in Coq. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 26:1-26:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ringer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.26,
  author =	{Ringer, Talia and Yazdani, Nathaniel and Leo, John and Grossman, Dan},
  title =	{{Ornaments for Proof Reuse in Coq}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110816},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: ornaments, proof reuse, proof automation}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 6 Document/PDF
  • 3 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2019

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Ringer, Talia
  • 2 Grossman, Dan
  • 1 Gandhi, Anshula
  • 1 Gardner, Andrew
  • 1 Ghanbari, Ali
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 5 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Formal software verification
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Software maintenance tools
  • 2 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Machine learning
  • 1 Security and privacy → Logic and verification
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Clone Detection
  • 1 Gallina
  • 1 Goal
  • 1 Lean tactic
  • 1 Lean theorem prover
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact