8 Search Results for "Silbak, Jad"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.62
Improved Rate for Non-Malleable Codes and Time-Lock Puzzles

Authors: Cody Freitag, Ilan Komargodski, Manu Kondapaneni, and Jad Silbak

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Non-malleable codes allow a sender to transmit a message to a receiver, while providing a "best-possible" integrity guarantee to ensure that no attacker - who cannot already decode the message - can meaningfully tamper the message in transit. If tampered, the received message should either be invalid or unrelated to the original message. Non-malleable time-lock puzzles (TLPs) are a special case of non-malleable codes for bounded polynomial-depth tampering with very efficient encoding. In this work, we give generic techniques for constructing non-malleable codes and non-malleable TLPs with improved rate, which captures the ratio of a message’s length to its encoding length. A key contribution of our work is identifying a security notion for non-malleability, which we term "CCA-hiding", sufficient for our compilers. CCA-hiding is a relaxation of CCA-security for encryption or commitments to the fine-grained setting of codes, and requires that the encoded message remains hidden, even given a decoding oracle for any other codeword. Intriguingly, CCA-hiding does not imply non-malleability in the fine-grained setting, as is the case for encryption and commitments. Using our new techniques, we give the following constructions: - Rate-1 CCA-hiding TLPs in the plain model. - Rate-1 non-malleable codes for bounded polynomial-depth tampering in the auxiliary-input random oracle model (AI-ROM). - Rate-(1/2) non-malleable TLPs in the AI-ROM.
Cite as

Cody Freitag, Ilan Komargodski, Manu Kondapaneni, and Jad Silbak. Improved Rate for Non-Malleable Codes and Time-Lock Puzzles. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 62:1-62:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{freitag_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.62,
  author =	{Freitag, Cody and Komargodski, Ilan and Kondapaneni, Manu and Silbak, Jad},
  title =	{{Improved Rate for Non-Malleable Codes and Time-Lock Puzzles}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{62:1--62:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.62},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253490},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.62},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non-malleable codes, Time-lock puzzles}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.73
Quantum Advantage from Sampling Shallow Circuits: Beyond Hardness of Marginals

Authors: Daniel Grier, Daniel M. Kane, Jackson Morris, Anthony Ostuni, and Kewen Wu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We construct a family of distributions {𝒟_n}_n with 𝒟_n over {0, 1}ⁿ and a family of depth-7 quantum circuits {C_n}_n such that 𝒟_n is produced exactly by C_n with the all zeros state as input, yet any constant-depth classical circuit with bounded fan-in gates evaluated on any binary product distribution has total variation distance 1 - e^{-Ω(n)} from 𝒟_n. Moreover, the quantum circuits we construct are geometrically local and use a relatively standard gate set: Hadamard, controlled-phase, CNOT, and Toffoli gates. All previous separations of this type suffer from some undesirable constraint on the classical circuit model or the quantum circuits witnessing the separation. Our family of distributions is inspired by the Parity Halving Problem of Watts, Kothari, Schaeffer, and Tal (STOC, 2019), which built on the work of Bravyi, Gosset, and König (Science, 2018) to separate shallow quantum and classical circuits for relational problems.
Cite as

Daniel Grier, Daniel M. Kane, Jackson Morris, Anthony Ostuni, and Kewen Wu. Quantum Advantage from Sampling Shallow Circuits: Beyond Hardness of Marginals. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 73:1-73:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grier_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.73,
  author =	{Grier, Daniel and Kane, Daniel M. and Morris, Jackson and Ostuni, Anthony and Wu, Kewen},
  title =	{{Quantum Advantage from Sampling Shallow Circuits: Beyond Hardness of Marginals}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{73:1--73:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.73},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253607},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.73},
  annote =	{Keywords: Shallow circuits, sampling, quantum circuits}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.12
Key-Agreement with Perfect Completeness from Random Oracles

Authors: Noam Mazor

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 343, 6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025)

Abstract
In the Random Oracle Model (ROM) all parties have oracle access to a common random function, and the parties are limited in the number of queries they can make to the oracle. The Merkle’s Puzzles protocol, introduced by Merkle [CACM '78], is a key-agreement protocol in the ROM with a quadratic gap between the query complexity of the honest parties and the eavesdropper. This quadratic gap is known to be optimal, by the works of Impagliazzo and Rudich [STOC ’89] and Barak and Mahmoody [Crypto ’09]. When the oracle function is injective or a permutation, Merkle’s Puzzles has perfect completeness. That is, it is certain that the protocol results in agreement between the parties. However, without such an assumption on the random function, there is a small error probability, and the parties may end up holding different keys. This fact raises the question: Is there a key-agreement protocol with perfect completeness and super-linear security in the ROM? In this paper we give a positive answer to the above question, showing that changes to the query distribution of the parties in Merkle’s Puzzles, yield a protocol with perfect completeness and roughly the same security.
Cite as

Noam Mazor. Key-Agreement with Perfect Completeness from Random Oracles. In 6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 343, pp. 12:1-12:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mazor:LIPIcs.ITC.2025.12,
  author =	{Mazor, Noam},
  title =	{{Key-Agreement with Perfect Completeness from Random Oracles}},
  booktitle =	{6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:11},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-385-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{343},
  editor =	{Gilboa, Niv},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243628},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Key-Agreement, Random Oracle, Merkle’s Puzzles, Perfect Completeness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13
Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes

Authors: Meghal Gupta, Venkatesan Guruswami, and Mihir Singhal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
In order to communicate a message over a noisy channel, a sender (Alice) uses an error-correcting code to encode her message, a bitstring x, into a codeword. The receiver (Bob) decodes x correctly whenever there is at most a small constant fraction of adversarial errors in the transmitted codeword. We investigate the setting where Bob is restricted to be a low-space streaming algorithm. Specifically, Bob receives the message as a stream and must process it and write x in order to a write-only tape while using low (say polylogarithmic) space. Note that such a primitive then allows the execution of any downstream streaming computation on x. We show three basic results about this setting, which are informally as follows: [(i)] 1) There is a stream decodable code of near-quadratic length, resilient to error-fractions approaching the optimal bound of 1/4. 2) There is no stream decodable code of sub-quadratic length, even to correct any small constant fraction of errors. 3) If Bob need only compute a private linear function of the bits of x, instead of writing them all to the output tape, there is a stream decodable code of near-linear length. Our constructions use locally decodable codes with additional functionality in the decoding, and (for the result on linear functions) repeated tensoring. Our lower bound, which rather surprisingly demonstrates a strong information-theoretic limitation originating from a computational restriction, proceeds via careful control of the message indices that may be output during successive blocks of the stream, a task complicated by the arbitrary state of the decoder during the algorithm.
Cite as

Meghal Gupta, Venkatesan Guruswami, and Mihir Singhal. Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 13:1-13:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13,
  author =	{Gupta, Meghal and Guruswami, Venkatesan and Singhal, Mihir},
  title =	{{Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237072},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coding theory, Streaming computation, Locally decodable code, Lower Bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88
Detecting and Correcting Computationally Bounded Errors: A Simple Construction Under Minimal Assumptions

Authors: Jad Silbak and Daniel Wichs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We study error detection and error correction in a computationally bounded world, where errors are introduced by an arbitrary polynomial time adversarial channel. We consider codes where the encoding procedure uses random coins and define two distinct variants: (1) in randomized codes, fresh randomness is chosen during each encoding operation and is unknown a priori, while (2) in self-seeded codes, the randomness of the encoding procedure is fixed once upfront and is known to the adversary. In both cases, the randomness need not be known to the decoding procedure, and there is no trusted common setup between the encoder and decoder. The encoding and decoding algorithms are efficient and run in some fixed polynomial time, independent of the run time of the adversary. The parameters of standard codes for worst-case (inefficient) errors are limited by the Singleton bound: for rate R it is not possible to detect more than a 1-R fraction of errors, or uniquely correct more than a (1-R)/2 fraction of errors, and efficient codes matching this bound exist for sufficiently large alphabets. In the computationally bounded setting, we show that going beyond the Singleton bound implies one-way functions in the case of randomized codes and collision-resistant hash functions in the case of self-seeded codes. We construct randomized and self-seeded codes under these respective minimal assumptions with essentially optimal parameters over a constant-sized alphabet: - Detection: the codes have a rate R ≈ 1 while detecting a ρ ≈ 1 fraction of errors. - Correction: for any ρ < 1/2, the codes uniquely correct a ρ fraction of errors with rate R ≈ 1-ρ. Codes for computationally bounded errors were studied in several prior works starting with Lipton (STACS '94), but all such works either: (a) need some trusted common setup (e.g., public-key infrastructure, common reference string) between the encoder and decoder, or (b) only handle channels whose complexity is a prior bounded below that of the code.
Cite as

Jad Silbak and Daniel Wichs. Detecting and Correcting Computationally Bounded Errors: A Simple Construction Under Minimal Assumptions. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 88:1-88:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{silbak_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88,
  author =	{Silbak, Jad and Wichs, Daniel},
  title =	{{Detecting and Correcting Computationally Bounded Errors: A Simple Construction Under Minimal Assumptions}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{88:1--88:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227167},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88},
  annote =	{Keywords: Error Correction, One-Way Functions, Collision Resistant Hashing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39
Data Reconstruction: When You See It and When You Don't

Authors: Edith Cohen, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer, and Eliad Tsfadia

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We revisit the fundamental question of formally defining what constitutes a reconstruction attack. While often clear from the context, our exploration reveals that a precise definition is much more nuanced than it appears, to the extent that a single all-encompassing definition may not exist. Thus, we employ a different strategy and aim to "sandwich" the concept of reconstruction attacks by addressing two complementing questions: (i) What conditions guarantee that a given system is protected against such attacks? (ii) Under what circumstances does a given attack clearly indicate that a system is not protected? More specifically, - We introduce a new definitional paradigm - Narcissus Resiliency - to formulate a security definition for protection against reconstruction attacks. This paradigm has a self-referential nature that enables it to circumvent shortcomings of previously studied notions of security. Furthermore, as a side-effect, we demonstrate that Narcissus resiliency captures as special cases multiple well-studied concepts including differential privacy and other security notions of one-way functions and encryption schemes. - We formulate a link between reconstruction attacks and Kolmogorov complexity. This allows us to put forward a criterion for evaluating when such attacks are convincingly successful.
Cite as

Edith Cohen, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer, and Eliad Tsfadia. Data Reconstruction: When You See It and When You Don't. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 39:1-39:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39,
  author =	{Cohen, Edith and Kaplan, Haim and Mansour, Yishay and Moran, Shay and Nissim, Kobbi and Stemmer, Uri and Tsfadia, Eliad},
  title =	{{Data Reconstruction: When You See It and When You Don't}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226674},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, reconstruction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.66
Incompressiblity and Next-Block Pseudoentropy

Authors: Iftach Haitner, Noam Mazor, and Jad Silbak

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 251, 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)

Abstract
A distribution is k-incompressible, Yao [FOCS '82], if no efficient compression scheme compresses it to less than k bits. While being a natural measure, its relation to other computational analogs of entropy such as pseudoentropy, Hastad, Impagliazzo, Levin, and Luby [SICOMP '99], and to other cryptographic hardness assumptions, was unclear. We advance towards a better understating of this notion, showing that a k-incompressible distribution has (k-2) bits of next-block pseudoentropy, a refinement of pseudoentropy introduced by Haitner, Reingold, and Vadhan [SICOMP '13]. We deduce that a samplable distribution X that is (H(X)+2)-incompressible, implies the existence of one-way functions.
Cite as

Iftach Haitner, Noam Mazor, and Jad Silbak. Incompressiblity and Next-Block Pseudoentropy. In 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 251, pp. 66:1-66:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{haitner_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.66,
  author =	{Haitner, Iftach and Mazor, Noam and Silbak, Jad},
  title =	{{Incompressiblity and Next-Block Pseudoentropy}},
  booktitle =	{14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)},
  pages =	{66:1--66:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-263-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{251},
  editor =	{Tauman Kalai, Yael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.66},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-175697},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.66},
  annote =	{Keywords: incompressibility, next-block pseudoentropy, sparse languages}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2016.45
Explicit List-Decodable Codes with Optimal Rate for Computationally Bounded Channels

Authors: Ronen Shaltiel and Jad Silbak

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 60, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2016)

Abstract
A stochastic code is a pair of encoding and decoding procedures where Encoding procedure receives a k bit message m, and a d bit uniform string S. The code is (p,L)-list-decodable against a class C of "channel functions" from n bits to n bits, if for every message m and every channel C in C that induces at most $pn$ errors, applying decoding on the "received word" C(Enc(m,S)) produces a list of at most L messages that contain m with high probability (over the choice of uniform S). Note that both the channel C and the decoding algorithm Dec do not receive the random variable S. The rate of a code is the ratio between the message length and the encoding length, and a code is explicit if Enc, Dec run in time poly(n). Guruswami and Smith (J. ACM, to appear), showed that for every constants 0 < p < 1/2 and c>1 there are Monte-Carlo explicit constructions of stochastic codes with rate R >= 1-H(p)-epsilon that are (p,L=poly(1/epsilon))-list decodable for size n^c channels. Monte-Carlo, means that the encoding and decoding need to share a public uniformly chosen poly(n^c) bit string Y, and the constructed stochastic code is (p,L)-list decodable with high probability over the choice of Y. Guruswami and Smith pose an open problem to give fully explicit (that is not Monte-Carlo) explicit codes with the same parameters, under hardness assumptions. In this paper we resolve this open problem, using a minimal assumption: the existence of poly-time computable pseudorandom generators for small circuits, which follows from standard complexity assumptions by Impagliazzo and Wigderson (STOC 97). Guruswami and Smith also asked to give a fully explicit unconditional constructions with the same parameters against O(log n)-space online channels. (These are channels that have space O(log n) and are allowed to read the input codeword in one pass). We resolve this open problem. Finally, we consider a tighter notion of explicitness, in which the running time of encoding and list-decoding algorithms does not increase, when increasing the complexity of the channel. We give explicit constructions (with rate approaching 1-H(p) for every p <= p_0 for some p_0>0) for channels that are circuits of size 2^{n^{Omega(1/d)}} and depth d. Here, the running time of encoding and decoding is a fixed polynomial (that does not depend on d). Our approach builds on the machinery developed by Guruswami and Smith, replacing some probabilistic arguments with explicit constructions. We also present a simplified and general approach that makes the reductions in the proof more efficient, so that we can handle weak classes of channels.
Cite as

Ronen Shaltiel and Jad Silbak. Explicit List-Decodable Codes with Optimal Rate for Computationally Bounded Channels. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 60, pp. 45:1-45:38, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shaltiel_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2016.45,
  author =	{Shaltiel, Ronen and Silbak, Jad},
  title =	{{Explicit List-Decodable Codes with Optimal Rate for Computationally Bounded Channels}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2016)},
  pages =	{45:1--45:38},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-018-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{60},
  editor =	{Jansen, Klaus and Mathieu, Claire and Rolim, Jos\'{e} D. P. and Umans, Chris},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2016.45},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-66682},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2016.45},
  annote =	{Keywords: Error Correcting Codes, List Decoding, Pseudorandomness}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 8 Document/PDF
  • 6 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2016

  • Refine by Author
  • 4 Silbak, Jad
  • 2 Mazor, Noam
  • 1 Cohen, Edith
  • 1 Freitag, Cody
  • 1 Grier, Daniel
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 8 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Computational complexity and cryptography
  • 1 Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy
  • 1 Security and privacy → Information-theoretic techniques
  • 1 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity
  • 1 Theory of computation → Complexity classes
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Coding theory
  • 1 Collision Resistant Hashing
  • 1 Error Correcting Codes
  • 1 Error Correction
  • 1 Key-Agreement
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact