Search Results

Documents authored by Depian, Thomas


Document
Constrained Boundary Labeling

Authors: Thomas Depian, Martin Nöllenburg, Soeren Terziadis, and Markus Wallinger

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 322, 35th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2024)


Abstract
Boundary labeling is a technique in computational geometry used to label dense sets of feature points in an illustration. It involves placing labels along an axis-aligned bounding box and connecting each label with its corresponding feature point using non-crossing leader lines. Although boundary labeling is well-studied, semantic constraints on the labels have not been investigated thoroughly. In this paper, we introduce grouping and ordering constraints in boundary labeling: Grouping constraints enforce that all labels in a group are placed consecutively on the boundary, and ordering constraints enforce a partial order over the labels. We show that it is NP-hard to find a labeling for arbitrarily sized labels with unrestricted positions along one side of the boundary. However, we obtain polynomial-time algorithms if we restrict this problem either to uniform-height labels or to a finite set of candidate positions. Finally, we show that finding a labeling on two opposite sides of the boundary is NP-complete, even for uniform-height labels and finite label positions.

Cite as

Thomas Depian, Martin Nöllenburg, Soeren Terziadis, and Markus Wallinger. Constrained Boundary Labeling. In 35th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 322, pp. 26:1-26:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{depian_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2024.26,
  author =	{Depian, Thomas and N\"{o}llenburg, Martin and Terziadis, Soeren and Wallinger, Markus},
  title =	{{Constrained Boundary Labeling}},
  booktitle =	{35th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2024)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-354-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{322},
  editor =	{Mestre, Juli\'{a}n and Wirth, Anthony},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2024.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-221539},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2024.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Boundary labeling, Grouping constraints, Ordering constraints}
}
Document
The Parameterized Complexity Of Extending Stack Layouts

Authors: Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Robert Ganian, and Martin Nöllenburg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 320, 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)


Abstract
An 𝓁-page stack layout (also known as an 𝓁-page book embedding) of a graph is a linear order of the vertex set together with a partition of the edge set into 𝓁 stacks (or pages), such that the endpoints of no two edges on the same stack alternate. We study the problem of extending a given partial 𝓁-page stack layout into a complete one, which can be seen as a natural generalization of the classical NP-hard problem of computing a stack layout of an input graph from scratch. Given the inherent intractability of the problem, we focus on identifying tractable fragments through the refined lens of parameterized complexity analysis. Our results paint a detailed and surprisingly rich complexity-theoretic landscape of the problem which includes the identification of paraNP-hard, W[1]-hard and XP-tractable, as well as fixed-parameter tractable fragments of stack layout extension via a natural sequence of parameterizations.

Cite as

Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Robert Ganian, and Martin Nöllenburg. The Parameterized Complexity Of Extending Stack Layouts. In 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 320, pp. 12:1-12:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{depian_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2024.12,
  author =	{Depian, Thomas and Fink, Simon D. and Ganian, Robert and N\"{o}llenburg, Martin},
  title =	{{The Parameterized Complexity Of Extending Stack Layouts}},
  booktitle =	{32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-343-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{320},
  editor =	{Felsner, Stefan and Klein, Karsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2024.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-212960},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2024.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stack Layout, Drawing Extension, Parameterized Complexity, Book Embedding}
}
Document
Transitions in Dynamic Point Labeling

Authors: Thomas Depian, Guangping Li, Martin Nöllenburg, and Jules Wulms

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 277, 12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023)


Abstract
The labeling of point features on a map is a well-studied topic. In a static setting, the goal is to find a non-overlapping label placement for (a subset of) point features. In a dynamic setting, the set of point features and their corresponding labels change, and the labeling has to adapt to such changes. To aid the user in tracking these changes, we can use morphs, here called transitions, to indicate how a labeling changes. Such transitions have not gained much attention yet, and we investigate different types of transitions for labelings of points, most notably consecutive transitions and simultaneous transitions. We give (tight) bounds on the number of overlaps that can occur during these transitions. When each label has a (non-negative) weight associated to it, and each overlap imposes a penalty proportional to the weight of the overlapping labels, we show that it is NP-complete to decide whether the penalty during a simultaneous transition has weight at most k. Finally, in a case study, we consider geotagged Twitter data on a map, by labeling points with rectangular labels showing tweets. We developed a prototype implementation to evaluate different transition styles in practice, measuring both number of overlaps and transition duration.

Cite as

Thomas Depian, Guangping Li, Martin Nöllenburg, and Jules Wulms. Transitions in Dynamic Point Labeling. In 12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 277, pp. 2:1-2:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{depian_et_al:LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.2,
  author =	{Depian, Thomas and Li, Guangping and N\"{o}llenburg, Martin and Wulms, Jules},
  title =	{{Transitions in Dynamic Point Labeling}},
  booktitle =	{12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-288-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{277},
  editor =	{Beecham, Roger and Long, Jed A. and Smith, Dianna and Zhao, Qunshan and Wise, Sarah},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-188971},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dynamic labels, Label overlaps, Morphs, NP-completeness, Case study}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail