101 Search Results for "Aspnes, James"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 221

1st Symposium on Algorithmic Foundations of Dynamic Networks (SAND 2022)

SAND 2022, March 28-30, 2022, Virtual Conference

Editors: James Aspnes and Othon Michail

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 95

21st International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2017)

OPODIS 2017, December 18-20, 2017, Lisbon, Portugal

Editors: James Aspnes, Alysson Bessani, Pascal Felber, and João Leitão

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.45
Fairness in the k-Server Problem

Authors: Mohammadreza Daneshvaramoli, Mohammad Hajiesmaili, Shahin Kamali, Helia Karisani, and Cameron Musco

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We initiate a formal study of fairness for the k-server problem, where the objective is not only to minimize the total movement cost, but also to distribute the cost equitably among servers. We first define a general notion of (α,β)-fairness, where, for parameters α ≥ 1 and β ≥ 0, no server incurs more than an α/k-fraction of the total cost plus an additive term β. We then show that fairness can be achieved without a loss in competitiveness in both the offline and online settings. In the offline setting, we give a deterministic algorithm that, for any ε > 0, transforms any optimal solution into an (α,β)-fair solution for α = 1 + ε and β = O(diam ⋅ log k / ε), while increasing the cost of the solution by just an additive O(diam ⋅ k log k / ε) term. Here diam is the diameter of the underlying metric space. We give a similar result in the online setting, showing that any competitive algorithm can be transformed into a randomized online algorithm that is fair with high probability against an oblivious adversary and still competitive up to a small loss. The above results leave open a significant question: can fairness be achieved in the online setting, either with a deterministic algorithm or a randomized algorithm, against a fully adaptive adversary? We make progress towards answering this question, showing that the classic deterministic Double Coverage Algorithm (DCA) is fair on line metrics and on tree metrics when k = 2. However, we also show a negative result: DCA fails to be fair for any non-vacuous parameters on general tree metrics. We further show that on uniform metrics (i.e., the paging problem), the deterministic First-In First-Out (FIFO) algorithm is fair. We show that any "marking algorithm", including the Least Recently Used (LRU) algorithm, also satisfies a weaker, but still meaningful notion of fairness.
Cite as

Mohammadreza Daneshvaramoli, Mohammad Hajiesmaili, Shahin Kamali, Helia Karisani, and Cameron Musco. Fairness in the k-Server Problem. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 45:1-45:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{daneshvaramoli_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.45,
  author =	{Daneshvaramoli, Mohammadreza and Hajiesmaili, Mohammad and Kamali, Shahin and Karisani, Helia and Musco, Cameron},
  title =	{{Fairness in the k-Server Problem}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{45:1--45:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.45},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253328},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.45},
  annote =	{Keywords: k-server problem, online algorithms, fairness, competitive analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98
Weighted Chairman Assignment and Flow-Time Scheduling

Authors: Siyue Liu and Victor Reis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Given positive integers m, n, a fractional assignment x ∈ [0,1]^{m × n} and weights d ∈ ℝⁿ_{> 0}, we show that there exists an assignment y ∈ {0,1}^{m × n} so that for every i ∈ [m] and t ∈ [n], |∑_{j ∈ [t]} d_j (x_{ij} - y_{ij})| < max_{j ∈ [n]} d_j. This generalizes a result of Tijdeman (1973) on the unweighted version, known as the chairman assignment problem. This also confirms a special case of the single-source unsplittable flow conjecture with arc-wise lower and upper bounds due to Morell and Skutella (IPCO 2020). As an application, we consider a scheduling problem where jobs have release times and machines have closing times, and a job can only be scheduled on a machine if it is released before the machine closes. We give a 3-approximation algorithm for maximum flow-time minimization.
Cite as

Siyue Liu and Victor Reis. Weighted Chairman Assignment and Flow-Time Scheduling. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 98:1-98:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{liu_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98,
  author =	{Liu, Siyue and Reis, Victor},
  title =	{{Weighted Chairman Assignment and Flow-Time Scheduling}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{98:1--98:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253858},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98},
  annote =	{Keywords: prefix discrepancy, flow-time scheduling, unsplittable flow}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.36
Beyond 2-Edge-Connectivity: Algorithms and Impossibility for Content-Oblivious Leader Election

Authors: Yi-Jun Chang, Lyuting Chen, and Haoran Zhou

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The content-oblivious model, introduced by Censor-Hillel, Cohen, Gelles, and Sela (PODC 2022; Distributed Computing 2023), captures an extremely weak form of communication where nodes can only send asynchronous, content-less pulses. They showed that in 2-edge-connected networks, any distributed algorithm can be simulated in the content-oblivious model, provided that a unique leader is designated a priori. Subsequent works of Frei, Gelles, Ghazy, and Nolin (DISC 2024) and Chalopin et al. (DISC 2025) developed content-oblivious leader election algorithms, first for unoriented rings and then for general 2-edge-connected graphs. These results establish that all graph problems are solvable in content-oblivious, 2-edge-connected networks. Much less is known about networks that are not 2-edge-connected. Censor-Hillel, Cohen, Gelles, and Sela showed that no non-constant function f(x,y) can be computed correctly by two parties using content-oblivious communication over a single edge, where one party holds x and the other holds y. This seemingly ruled out many natural graph problems on non-2-edge-connected graphs. In this work, we show that, with the knowledge of network topology G, leader election is possible in a wide range of graphs. Our main contributions are as follows: Impossibility: Graphs symmetric about an edge admit no randomized terminating leader election algorithm, even when nodes have unique identifiers and full knowledge of G. Leader election algorithms: Trees that are not symmetric about any edge admit a quiescently terminating leader election algorithm with topology knowledge, even in anonymous networks, using O(n²) messages, where n is the number of nodes. Moreover, even-diameter trees admit a terminating leader election given only the knowledge of the network diameter D = 2r, with message complexity O(nr). Necessity of topology knowledge: In the family of graphs 𝒢 = {P₃, P₅}, both the 3-path P₃ and the 5-path P₅ admit a quiescently terminating leader election if nodes know the topology exactly. However, if nodes only know that the underlying topology belongs to 𝒢, then terminating leader election is impossible.
Cite as

Yi-Jun Chang, Lyuting Chen, and Haoran Zhou. Beyond 2-Edge-Connectivity: Algorithms and Impossibility for Content-Oblivious Leader Election. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 36:1-36:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chang_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.36,
  author =	{Chang, Yi-Jun and Chen, Lyuting and Zhou, Haoran},
  title =	{{Beyond 2-Edge-Connectivity: Algorithms and Impossibility for Content-Oblivious Leader Election}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253239},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asynchronous model, fault tolerance, quiescent termination}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21
Solving Tasks with Fewer Registers Than Processes

Authors: Eli Gafni, Giuliano Losa, Michel Raynal, and Gadi Taubenfeld

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
This paper studies distributed-computing tasks through the lens of space complexity in the read/write wait-free model, defined as the number of multi-reader-multi-writer atomic read/write registers needed to solve a task using a wait-free algorithm. Surprisingly, even though the read/write wait-free model is at the foundation of distributed computing, previous work on space complexity has focused on synchronization primitives stronger than read/write registers or on weaker progress conditions. The paper reveals that the read/write wait-free model offers a rich space-complexity landscape: (1) assuming non-anonymous processes, it shows that there is an infinite hierarchy of tasks of increasing space complexity; (2) it shows that space complexity separates anonymous from non-anonymous memory; (3) regardless of process or register anonymity, it exhibits a task of space complexity two, which is the minimal non-trivial space complexity; (4) finally, it shows that subcases of the adopt-commit task have different space complexity in non-anonymous memory under bounded wait-freedom.
Cite as

Eli Gafni, Giuliano Losa, Michel Raynal, and Gadi Taubenfeld. Solving Tasks with Fewer Registers Than Processes. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 21:1-21:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gafni_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21,
  author =	{Gafni, Eli and Losa, Giuliano and Raynal, Michel and Taubenfeld, Gadi},
  title =	{{Solving Tasks with Fewer Registers Than Processes}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251947},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asynchrony, Read/write registers, Wait-freedom, Tasks, Covering argument, Lower bound, Space complexity, Anonymous Processes, Anonymous Memory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.24
On Time-Optimal, Fault-Tolerant Algorithms for Connected Consensus Beyond Grade Two

Authors: Alan Ernesto Arteaga Vázquez

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
A common question in the asynchronous model is whether some given notion of agreement between processes is achievable. Usually, we formalise such agreement notions in the form of agreement problems. Some of these problems also receive the name of coordination primitives. Several fault-tolerant algorithms in asynchronous systems rely upon the use of different primitives as building blocks, such as adopt-commit, crusader agreement, or graded broadcast. Recently, the connected consensus problem - a form of agreement over a specific family of graphs parametrised by a positive integer R- was introduced. This problem unifies the three mentioned primitives while extending them for multi-valued inputs. Moreover, the problem is equipped with a security condition called binding, which limits the effect of malicious processes over the decision of correct parties. While fault-tolerant connected consensus algorithms for R = 1 and R = 2 are known, the existence of algorithmic solutions for any positive integer parameter remained an open question. In this work, we introduce a pair of fault-tolerant algorithms for connected consensus when the R parameter is any positive integer. We introduce a crash-resilient algorithm, which is optimal with respect to the maximum number of possible faulty processes. Our second algorithm is resilient to Byzantine failures; whose failure-resilience is optimal for a specific class of algorithms. Both algorithms satisfy the binding property and match the best known time complexities achieved for the R = 1 and R = 2 cases, further achieving time optimality for the general case in the crash-failure setting, and asymptotic time optimality in the Byzantine scenario.
Cite as

Alan Ernesto Arteaga Vázquez. On Time-Optimal, Fault-Tolerant Algorithms for Connected Consensus Beyond Grade Two. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 24:1-24:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arteagavazquez:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.24,
  author =	{Arteaga V\'{a}zquez, Alan Ernesto},
  title =	{{On Time-Optimal, Fault-Tolerant Algorithms for Connected Consensus Beyond Grade Two}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:28},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251973},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Approximate Agreement, Binding, Connected Consensus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29
How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?

Authors: Faith Ellen, Shihao Liu, Leqi Zhu, Eli Gafni, and Rati Gelashvili

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
The class of extension-based proofs encompasses traditional valency arguments. It has been shown that they are insufficient to establish the impossibility of (n-1)-set agreement among n ≥ 3 processes in an asynchronous system with crash failures. We generalize this definition to k-exhaustive extension-based proofs, in which a prover can learn the maximum length of all executions involving a set of at most k processes from a specified configuration (which may be infinite). An upper bound on the length of these executions enables the prover to determine the outputs of all these executions. When k = n, this enables the prover to perform an exhaustive search of all reachable configurations, so it knows everything about the protocol. On the other hand, extension based proofs are as powerful as 1-exhaustive extension-based proofs. For any task with no deterministic, wait-free solution among n ≥ 2 processes, we show that there is an (n-1)-exhaustive extension-based proof of its impossibility. This is done using a new characterization of such tasks. In contrast, we prove that for 1 ≤ k ≤ n-2, there is no k-exhaustive extension-based proof of the impossibility of (n-1)-set agreement.
Cite as

Faith Ellen, Shihao Liu, Leqi Zhu, Eli Gafni, and Rati Gelashvili. How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 29:1-29:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ellen_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29,
  author =	{Ellen, Faith and Liu, Shihao and Zhu, Leqi and Gafni, Eli and Gelashvili, Rati},
  title =	{{How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252020},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Extension-based proof, set agreement, valency argument, zero-one exclusion}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.30
Byzantine-Tolerant Phase Clock

Authors: Costas Busch, Paweł Garncarek, and Dariusz R. Kowalski

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
A phase clock is a basic synchronization mechanism that keeps distributed nodes closely synchronized to execute the same phase of a distributed algorithm. A phase clock is typically implemented with a local logical counter that keeps track of the current phase count. Phase clocks are particularly useful in population protocols for implementing leader election and majority selection. We study phase clocks that tolerate Byzantine faults. We show that there is a phase clock that tolerates up to f < n/3 faulty nodes, where n is the number of nodes, such that the gap of the local counter values is O(n²log n). The gap can be further lowered to O(log n) when f ≤ n/8. We also show that if f > n/3, then the gap grows to infinity as time increases. While analyzing phase clock we introduce novel techniques and bounds for balls into bins processes, which might be of independent interest. Using the phase clock, we obtain a majority selection population protocol that tolerates up to f faults and decides on the majority value in O(log² n) parallel time using poly-log states per node.
Cite as

Costas Busch, Paweł Garncarek, and Dariusz R. Kowalski. Byzantine-Tolerant Phase Clock. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 30:1-30:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{busch_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.30,
  author =	{Busch, Costas and Garncarek, Pawe{\l} and Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  title =	{{Byzantine-Tolerant Phase Clock}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252036},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: phase clock, Byzantine nodes, population protocols, balls into bins}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33
Resolving Conflicts with Grace: Dynamically Concurrent Universality

Authors: Petr Kuznetsov and Nathan Josia Schrodt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
Synchronization is the major obstacle to scalability in distributed computing. Concurrent operations on the shared data engage in synchronization when they encounter a conflict, i.e., their effects depend on the order in which they are applied. Ideally, one would like to detect conflicts in a dynamic manner, i.e., adjusting to the current system state. Indeed, it is very common that two concurrent operations conflict only in some rarely occurring states. In this paper, we define the notion of dynamic concurrency: an operation employs strong synchronization primitives only if it has to arbitrate with concurrent operations, given the current system state. We then present a dynamically concurrent universal construction.
Cite as

Petr Kuznetsov and Nathan Josia Schrodt. Resolving Conflicts with Grace: Dynamically Concurrent Universality. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 33:1-33:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kuznetsov_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33,
  author =	{Kuznetsov, Petr and Schrodt, Nathan Josia},
  title =	{{Resolving Conflicts with Grace: Dynamically Concurrent Universality}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252068},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Universal Construction, Consensus, Dynamic Concurrency}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.21
Overlay Network Construction: Improved Overall and Node-Wise Message Complexity

Authors: Yi-Jun Chang, Yanyu Chen, and Gopinath Mishra

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
We consider the problem of constructing distributed overlay networks, where nodes in a reconfigurable system can create or sever connections with nodes whose identifiers they know. Initially, each node knows only its own and its neighbors' identifiers, forming a local channel, while the evolving structure is termed the global channel. The goal is to reconfigure any connected graph into a desired topology, such as a bounded-degree expander graph or a well-formed tree (WFT) with a constant maximum degree and logarithmic diameter, minimizing the total number of rounds and message complexity. This problem mirrors real-world peer-to-peer network construction, where creating robust and efficient systems is desired. We study the overlay reconstruction problem in a network of n nodes in two models: GOSSIP-reply and HYBRID. In the GOSSIP-reply model, each node can send a message and receive a corresponding reply message in one round. In the HYBRID model, a node can send O(1) messages to each neighbor in the local channel and a total of O(log n) messages in the global channel. In both models, we propose protocols for WFT construction with O (n log n) message complexities using messages of O(log n) bits. In the GOSSIP-reply model, our protocol takes O(log n) rounds while in the HYBRID model, our protocol takes O(log² n) rounds. Both protocols use O (n log² n) bits of communication. We obtain improved bounds over prior work: GOSSIP-reply: A recent result by Dufoulon et al. (ITCS 2024) achieved O(log⁵ n) round complexity and O (n log⁵ n) message complexity using messages of at least Ω(log² n) bits in GOSSIP-reply. With messages of size O(log n), our protocol achieves an optimal round complexity of O(log n) and an improved message complexity of O(n log n). HYBRID: Götte et al. (Distributed Computing 2023) showed an optimal O(log n)-round algorithm with O(log² n) global messages per round which incurs a message complexity of Ω(m), where m is the number of edges in the initial topology. At the cost of increasing the round complexity to O(log² n) while using only O(log n) messages globally, our protocol achieves a message complexity that is independent of m. Our approach ensures that the total number of messages for node v, with degree deg(v) in the initial topology, is bounded by O(deg(v) + log n), while the algorithm of Götte et al. requires O(deg(v) + (log⁴ n)/(log log n)) messages per node.
Cite as

Yi-Jun Chang, Yanyu Chen, and Gopinath Mishra. Overlay Network Construction: Improved Overall and Node-Wise Message Complexity. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 21:1-21:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chang_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.21,
  author =	{Chang, Yi-Jun and Chen, Yanyu and Mishra, Gopinath},
  title =	{{Overlay Network Construction: Improved Overall and Node-Wise Message Complexity}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251025},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed algorithms, Overlay networks, Expander graphs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.3
An Almost-Logarithmic Lower Bound for Leader Election with Bounded Value Contention

Authors: Dan Alistarh, Faith Ellen, and Alexander Fedorov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
We investigate the step complexity of the Leader Election problem (and implementing the corresponding test-and-set object) in asynchronous shared memory, where processes communicate through registers supporting atomic read and write and must coordinate so that a single process becomes the leader. Determining tight step complexity bounds for solving this problem is one of the key open problems in the theory of shared memory distributed computing. The best known algorithm is a randomized tournament-tree, which has worst-case expected step complexity O(log N) for N processes. There are provably no deterministic wait-free algorithms, and only restricted lower bounds are known for obstruction-free and randomized wait-free algorithms. We introduce a new lower bound that establishes an Ω((log N)/(log log N + log Q)) step complexity for any obstruction-free Leader Election algorithm, where N is the number of processes, and 2 ≤ Q ≤ N is a bound on the value contention, which we define as the maximum number of different values that processes can be simultaneously poised to write to the same register in any execution of the algorithm. Our result is strictly stronger than previous bounds based on write contention. In particular, it implies new lower bounds on step complexity that depend on register size.
Cite as

Dan Alistarh, Faith Ellen, and Alexander Fedorov. An Almost-Logarithmic Lower Bound for Leader Election with Bounded Value Contention. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 3:1-3:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alistarh_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.3,
  author =	{Alistarh, Dan and Ellen, Faith and Fedorov, Alexander},
  title =	{{An Almost-Logarithmic Lower Bound for Leader Election with Bounded Value Contention}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248204},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Leader Election, Test-and-Set, Shared Memory, Lower Bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.32
Coordination Through Stochastic Channels

Authors: Pierre Fraigniaud, Boaz Patt-Shamir, and Sergio Rajsbaum

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
We consider a stochastic network model consisting of a set of n synchronous processes communicating by message passing. In each round, processes send messages directly to each other over a complete communication graph. The processes do not fail, but messages can be lost. Each message is delivered with probability p, for a given parameter p ∈ [0,1]. We study the following optimization version of approximate agreement in this model. We assume that processes start with binary input values, execute an algorithm for a fixed number of rounds, and decide values in [0,1] satisfying the usual validity requirement stating that if all processes start with the same input value, then they should all decide that value. We propose deterministic algorithms that minimize the expected discrepancy, namely, the expected maximum distance between the decided values. We also present lower bounds on the expected discrepancy, which demonstrate the optimality of our algorithms for two processes. Finally, we present applications of our algorithms to solve randomized consensus and randomized approximate agreement.
Cite as

Pierre Fraigniaud, Boaz Patt-Shamir, and Sergio Rajsbaum. Coordination Through Stochastic Channels. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 32:1-32:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fraigniaud_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.32,
  author =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre and Patt-Shamir, Boaz and Rajsbaum, Sergio},
  title =	{{Coordination Through Stochastic Channels}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248493},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Approximate agreement, randomized consensus, stochastic models, topology}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.27
On the h-Majority Dynamics with Many Opinions

Authors: Francesco d'Amore, Niccolò D'Archivio, George Giakkoupis, and Emanuele Natale

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
We present the first upper bound on the convergence time to consensus of the well-known h-majority dynamics with k opinions, in the synchronous setting, for h and k that are both non-constant values. We suppose that, at the beginning of the process, there is some initial additive bias towards some plurality opinion, that is, there is an opinion that is supported by x nodes while any other opinion is supported by strictly fewer nodes. We prove that, with high probability, if the bias is ω(√x) and the initial plurality opinion is supported by at least x = ω(log n) nodes, then the process converges to plurality consensus in O(log n) rounds whenever h = ω(n log n / x). A main corollary is the following: if k = o(n / log n) and the process starts from an almost-balanced configuration with an initial bias of magnitude ω(√{n/k}) towards the initial plurality opinion, then any function h = ω(k log n) suffices to guarantee convergence to consensus in O(log n) rounds, with high probability. Our upper bound shows that the lower bound of Ω(k / h²) rounds to reach consensus given by Becchetti et al. (2017) cannot be pushed further than Ω̃(k / h). Moreover, the bias we require is asymptotically smaller than the Ω(√{nlog n}) bias that guarantees plurality consensus in the 3-majority dynamics: in our case, the required bias is at most any (arbitrarily small) function in ω(√x) for any value of k ≥ 2.
Cite as

Francesco d'Amore, Niccolò D'Archivio, George Giakkoupis, and Emanuele Natale. On the h-Majority Dynamics with Many Opinions. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 27:1-27:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{damore_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.27,
  author =	{d'Amore, Francesco and D'Archivio, Niccol\`{o} and Giakkoupis, George and Natale, Emanuele},
  title =	{{On the h-Majority Dynamics with Many Opinions}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248448},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed Algorithms, Randomized Algorithms, Markov Chains, Consensus Problem, Opinion dynamics, Plurality Consensus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.21
Content-Oblivious Leader Election in 2-Edge-Connected Networks

Authors: Jérémie Chalopin, Yi-Jun Chang, Lyuting Chen, Giuseppe A. Di Luna, and Haoran Zhou

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Censor-Hillel, Cohen, Gelles, and Sela (PODC 2022 & Distributed Computing 2023) studied fully-defective asynchronous networks, where communication channels may arbitrarily corrupt messages. The model is equivalent to content-oblivious computation, where nodes communicate solely via pulses. They showed that if the network is 2-edge-connected, then any algorithm for a noiseless setting can be simulated in the fully-defective setting; otherwise, no non-trivial computation is possible in the fully-defective setting. However, their simulation requires a predesignated leader, which they conjectured to be necessary for any non-trivial content-oblivious task. Recently, Frei, Gelles, Ghazy, and Nolin (DISC 2024) refuted this conjecture for the special case of oriented ring topology. They designed two asynchronous content-oblivious leader election algorithms with message complexity O(n ⋅ ID_{max}), where n is the number of nodes and ID_{max} is the maximum ID. The first algorithm stabilizes in unoriented rings without termination detection. The second algorithm quiescently terminates in oriented rings, thus enabling the execution of the simulation algorithm after leader election. In this work, we present two results: General 2-edge-connected topologies: First, we show an asynchronous content-oblivious leader election algorithm that quiescently terminates in any 2-edge-connected network with message complexity O(m ⋅ N ⋅ ID_{min}), where m is the number of edges, N is a known upper bound on the number of nodes, and ID_{min} is the smallest ID. Combined with the above simulation, this result shows that whenever a size bound N is known, any noiseless algorithm can be simulated in the fully-defective model without a preselected leader, fully refuting the conjecture. Unoriented rings: We then show that the knowledge of N can be dropped in unoriented ring topologies by presenting a quiescently terminating election algorithm with message complexity O(n ⋅ ID_{max}) that matches the previous bound. Consequently, this result constitutes a strict improvement over the previous state of the art and shows that, on rings, fully-defective and noiseless communication are computationally equivalent, with no additional assumptions.
Cite as

Jérémie Chalopin, Yi-Jun Chang, Lyuting Chen, Giuseppe A. Di Luna, and Haoran Zhou. Content-Oblivious Leader Election in 2-Edge-Connected Networks. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 21:1-21:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chalopin_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.21,
  author =	{Chalopin, J\'{e}r\'{e}mie and Chang, Yi-Jun and Chen, Lyuting and Di Luna, Giuseppe A. and Zhou, Haoran},
  title =	{{Content-Oblivious Leader Election in 2-Edge-Connected Networks}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248385},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asynchronous model, fault tolerance, quiescent termination}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 99 Document/PDF
  • 31 Document/HTML
  • 2 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 8 2026
  • 23 2025
  • 29 2022
  • 2 2021
  • 1 2020
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 9 Aspnes, James
  • 4 Attiya, Hagit
  • 3 Bessani, Alysson
  • 3 Chang, Yi-Jun
  • 3 Czerner, Philipp
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 98 LIPIcs
  • 1 LITES

  • Refine by Classification
  • 25 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 9 Theory of computation → Distributed computing models
  • 5 Mathematics of computing → Discrete mathematics
  • 5 Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis
  • 5 Theory of computation → Models of computation
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 population protocols
  • 4 Distributed algorithms
  • 4 dynamic networks
  • 3 Distributed Systems
  • 3 distributed algorithms
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact