11 Search Results for "Brown, Chad E."

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.18
Formalising New Mathematics in Isabelle: Diagonal Ramsey

Authors: Lawrence C. Paulson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
The formalisation of mathematics is becoming routine, but its value to research mathematicians remains unproven. There are few examples of using proof assistants to verify new work. This paper reports the formalisation - inspired by a Lean one by Bhavik Mehta - of a major new result [Marcelo Campos et al., 2023] about Ramsey numbers. One unexpected finding was a heavy role for computer algebra techniques.
Cite as

Lawrence C. Paulson. Formalising New Mathematics in Isabelle: Diagonal Ramsey. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 18:1-18:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{paulson:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.18,
  author =	{Paulson, Lawrence C.},
  title =	{{Formalising New Mathematics in Isabelle: Diagonal Ramsey}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246163},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle, formalisation of mathematics, Ramsey’s theorem, computer algebra}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14
Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean

Authors: Chase Norman and Jeremy Avigad

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Canonical is a solver for type inhabitation in dependent type theory, that is, the problem of producing a term of a given type. We present a Lean tactic which invokes Canonical to generate proof terms and synthesize programs. The tactic supports higher-order and dependently-typed goals, structural recursion over indexed inductive types, and definitional equality. Canonical finds proofs for 84% of Natural Number Game problems in 51 seconds total.
Cite as

Chase Norman and Jeremy Avigad. Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 14:1-14:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{norman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14,
  author =	{Norman, Chase and Avigad, Jeremy},
  title =	{{Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246128},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automated Reasoning, Interactive Theorem Proving, Dependent Type Theory, Inhabitation, Unification, Program Synthesis, Formal Methods}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2025.11
Mutational Signature Refitting on Sparse Pan-Cancer Data

Authors: Gal Gilad, Teresa M. Przytycka, and Roded Sharan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 344, 25th International Conference on Algorithms for Bioinformatics (WABI 2025)

Abstract
Mutational processes shape cancer genomes, leaving characteristic marks that are termed signatures. The level of activity of each such process, or its signature exposure, provides important information on the disease, improving patient stratification and the prediction of drug response. Thus, there is growing interest in developing refitting methods that decipher those exposures. Previous work in this domain was unsupervised in nature, employing algebraic decomposition and probabilistic inference methods. Here we provide a supervised approach to the problem of signature refitting and show its superiority over current methods. Our method, SuRe, leverages a neural network model to capture correlations between signature exposures in real data. We show that SuRe outperforms previous methods on sparse mutation data from tumor type specific data sets, as well as pan-cancer data sets, with an increasing advantage as the data become sparser. We further demonstrate its utility in clinical settings.
Cite as

Gal Gilad, Teresa M. Przytycka, and Roded Sharan. Mutational Signature Refitting on Sparse Pan-Cancer Data. In 25th International Conference on Algorithms for Bioinformatics (WABI 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 344, pp. 11:1-11:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gilad_et_al:LIPIcs.WABI.2025.11,
  author =	{Gilad, Gal and Przytycka, Teresa M. and Sharan, Roded},
  title =	{{Mutational Signature Refitting on Sparse Pan-Cancer Data}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Conference on Algorithms for Bioinformatics (WABI 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-386-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{344},
  editor =	{Brejov\'{a}, Bro\v{n}a and Patro, Rob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239374},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: mutational signatures, signature refitting, cancer genomics, genomic data analysis, somatic mutations}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.8
Breaking Symmetries with Involutions

Authors: Michael Codish and Mikoláš Janota

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Symmetry breaking for graphs and other combinatorial objects is notoriously hard. On the one hand, complete symmetry breaks are exponential in size. On the other hand, current, state-of-the-art, partial symmetry breaks are often considered too weak to be of practical use. Recently, the concept of graph patterns has been introduced and provides a concise representation for (large) sets of non-canonical graphs, i.e. graphs that are not lex-leaders and can be excluded from search. In particular, four (specific) graph patterns apply to identify about 3/4 of the set of all non-canonical graphs. Taking this approach further, we discover that graph patterns that derive from permutations that are involutions play an important role in the construction of symmetry breaks for graphs. We take advantage of this to guide the construction of partial and complete symmetry-breaking constraints based on graph patterns. The resulting constraints are small in size and strong in the number of symmetries they break.
Cite as

Michael Codish and Mikoláš Janota. Breaking Symmetries with Involutions. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 8:1-8:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{codish_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.8,
  author =	{Codish, Michael and Janota, Mikol\'{a}\v{s}},
  title =	{{Breaking Symmetries with Involutions}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238699},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: graph symmetry, patterns, permutation, Ramsey graphs, greedy, CEGAR}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.34
Monad Translations for Higher-Order Logic

Authors: Thomas Traversié

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
Classical logic can be embedded into intuitionistic logic by inserting double negations in formulas. Several translations generalize this idea by using monad operators instead of double negations. They eliminate particular axioms, for instance the principle of excluded middle or the principle of explosion, and therefore can be used to embed classical logic into intuitionistic logic or intuitionistic logic into minimal logic. Such translations have been defined for first-order logic. In this paper, we define a translation, parameterized by monad operators, for higher-order logic. In particular, the property that any formula and its translation are equivalent in the presence of the eliminated axiom holds under functional extensionality and propositional extensionality. We apply this translation to embed higher-order classical (respectively intuitionistic) logic into higher-order intuitionistic (respectively minimal) logic. By adapting Friedman’s trick, we show that coherent formulas correspond to a constructive fragment of higher-order classical logic, meaning that we can transform classical proofs into intuitionistic proofs without modifying the proven statements.
Cite as

Thomas Traversié. Monad Translations for Higher-Order Logic. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 34:1-34:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{traversie:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.34,
  author =	{Traversi\'{e}, Thomas},
  title =	{{Monad Translations for Higher-Order Logic}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236495},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Higher-order logic, Intuitionistic logic, Kuroda’s translation, Monad}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.12
Stable Matching with Interviews

Authors: Itai Ashlagi, Jiale Chen, Mohammad Roghani, and Amin Saberi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
In several two-sided markets, including labor and dating, agents typically have limited information about their preferences prior to mutual interactions. This issue can result in matching frictions, as arising in the labor market for medical residencies, where high application rates are followed by a large number of interviews. Yet, the extensive literature on two-sided matching primarily focuses on models where agents know their preferences, leaving the interactions necessary for preference discovery largely overlooked. This paper studies this problem using an algorithmic approach, extending Gale-Shapley’s deferred acceptance to this context. Two algorithms are proposed. The first is an adaptive algorithm that expands upon Gale-Shapley’s deferred acceptance by incorporating interviews between applicants and positions. Similar to deferred acceptance, one side sequentially proposes to the other. However, the order of proposals is carefully chosen to ensure an interim stable matching is found. Furthermore, with high probability, the number of interviews conducted by each applicant or position is limited to O(log² n). In many seasonal markets, interactions occur more simultaneously, consisting of an initial interview phase followed by a clearing stage. We present a non-adaptive algorithm for generating a single stage set of in tiered random markets. The algorithm finds an interim stable matching in such markets while assigning no more than O(log³ n) interviews to each applicant or position.
Cite as

Itai Ashlagi, Jiale Chen, Mohammad Roghani, and Amin Saberi. Stable Matching with Interviews. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 12:1-12:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ashlagi_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.12,
  author =	{Ashlagi, Itai and Chen, Jiale and Roghani, Mohammad and Saberi, Amin},
  title =	{{Stable Matching with Interviews}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226402},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stable Matching, Gale–Shapley Algorithm, Algorithmic Game Theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.16
A Formal Proof of R(4,5)=25

Authors: Thibault Gauthier and Chad E. Brown

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 309, 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)

Abstract
In 1995, McKay and Radziszowski proved that the Ramsey number R(4,5) is equal to 25. Their proof relies on a combination of high-level arguments and computational steps. The authors have performed the computational parts of the proof with different implementations in order to reduce the possibility of an error in their programs. In this work, we prove this theorem in the interactive theorem prover HOL4 limiting the uncertainty to the small HOL4 kernel. Instead of verifying their algorithms directly, we rely on the HOL4 interface to MiniSat to prove gluing lemmas. To reduce the number of such lemmas and thus make the computational part of the proof feasible, we implement a generalization algorithm. We verify that its output covers all the possible cases by implementing a custom SAT-solver extended with a graph isomorphism checker.
Cite as

Thibault Gauthier and Chad E. Brown. A Formal Proof of R(4,5)=25. In 15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 309, pp. 16:1-16:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gauthier_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2024.16,
  author =	{Gauthier, Thibault and Brown, Chad E.},
  title =	{{A Formal Proof of R(4,5)=25}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2024)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-337-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{309},
  editor =	{Bertot, Yves and Kutsia, Temur and Norrish, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-207446},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2024.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Ramsey numbers, SAT solvers, symmetry breaking, generalization, HOL4}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.9
Automated Theorem Proving for Metamath

Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chad E. Brown, and Josef Urban

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 268, 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)

Abstract
Metamath is a proof assistant that keeps surprising outsiders by its combination of a very minimalist design with a large library of advanced results, ranking high on the Freek Wiedijk’s 100 list. In this work, we develop several translations of the Metamath logic and its large set-theoretical library into higher-order and first-order TPTP formats for automated theorem provers (ATPs). We show that state-of-the-art ATPs can prove 68% of the Metamath problems automatically when using the premises that were used in the human-written Metamath proofs. Finally, we add proof reconstruction and premise selection methods and combine the components into the first hammer system for Metamath.
Cite as

Mario Carneiro, Chad E. Brown, and Josef Urban. Automated Theorem Proving for Metamath. In 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 268, pp. 9:1-9:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carneiro_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2023.9,
  author =	{Carneiro, Mario and Brown, Chad E. and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{Automated Theorem Proving for Metamath}},
  booktitle =	{14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-284-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{268},
  editor =	{Naumowicz, Adam and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-183846},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Metamath, Automated theorem proving, Interactive theorem proving, Formal proof assistants, proof discovery}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.19
MizAR 60 for Mizar 50

Authors: Jan Jakubův, Karel Chvalovský, Zarathustra Goertzel, Cezary Kaliszyk, Mirek Olšák, Bartosz Piotrowski, Stephan Schulz, Martin Suda, and Josef Urban

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 268, 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)

Abstract
As a present to Mizar on its 50th anniversary, we develop an AI/TP system that automatically proves about 60% of the Mizar theorems in the hammer setting. We also automatically prove 75% of the Mizar theorems when the automated provers are helped by using only the premises used in the human-written Mizar proofs. We describe the methods and large-scale experiments leading to these results. This includes in particular the E and Vampire provers, their ENIGMA and Deepire learning modifications, a number of learning-based premise selection methods, and the incremental loop that interleaves growing a corpus of millions of ATP proofs with training increasingly strong AI/TP systems on them. We also present a selection of Mizar problems that were proved automatically.
Cite as

Jan Jakubův, Karel Chvalovský, Zarathustra Goertzel, Cezary Kaliszyk, Mirek Olšák, Bartosz Piotrowski, Stephan Schulz, Martin Suda, and Josef Urban. MizAR 60 for Mizar 50. In 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 268, pp. 19:1-19:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jakubuv_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2023.19,
  author =	{Jakub\r{u}v, Jan and Chvalovsk\'{y}, Karel and Goertzel, Zarathustra and Kaliszyk, Cezary and Ol\v{s}\'{a}k, Mirek and Piotrowski, Bartosz and Schulz, Stephan and Suda, Martin and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{MizAR 60 for Mizar 50}},
  booktitle =	{14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-284-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{268},
  editor =	{Naumowicz, Adam and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-183942},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mizar, ENIGMA, Automated Reasoning, Machine Learning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2022.4
Proofgold: Blockchain for Formal Methods

Authors: Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, Thibault Gauthier, and Josef Urban

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 105, 4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022)

Abstract
Proofgold is a peer to peer cryptocurrency making use of formal logic. Users can publish theories and then develop a theory by publishing documents with definitions, conjectures and proofs. The blockchain records the theories and their state of development (e.g., which theorems have been proven and when). Two of the main theories are a form of classical set theory (for formalizing mathematics) and an intuitionistic theory of higher-order abstract syntax (for reasoning about syntax with binders). We have also significantly modified the open source Proofgold Core client software to create a faster, more stable and more efficient client, Proofgold Lava. Two important changes are the cryptography code and the database code, and we discuss these improvements. We also discuss how the Proofgold network can be used to support large formalization efforts.
Cite as

Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, Thibault Gauthier, and Josef Urban. Proofgold: Blockchain for Formal Methods. In 4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 105, pp. 4:1-4:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brown_et_al:OASIcs.FMBC.2022.4,
  author =	{Brown, Chad E. and Kaliszyk, Cezary and Gauthier, Thibault and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{Proofgold: Blockchain for Formal Methods}},
  booktitle =	{4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-250-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{105},
  editor =	{Dargaye, Zaynah and Schneidewind, Clara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2022.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-171851},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2022.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal logic, Blockchain, Proofgold}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.9
Higher-Order Tarski Grothendieck as a Foundation for Formal Proof

Authors: Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, and Karol Pąk

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 141, 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)

Abstract
We formally introduce a foundation for computer verified proofs based on higher-order Tarski-Grothendieck set theory. We show that this theory has a model if a 2-inaccessible cardinal exists. This assumption is the same as the one needed for a model of plain Tarski-Grothendieck set theory. The foundation allows the co-existence of proofs based on two major competing foundations for formal proofs: higher-order logic and TG set theory. We align two co-existing Isabelle libraries, Isabelle/HOL and Isabelle/Mizar, in a single foundation in the Isabelle logical framework. We do this by defining isomorphisms between the basic concepts, including integers, functions, lists, and algebraic structures that preserve the important operations. With this we can transfer theorems proved in higher-order logic to TG set theory and vice versa. We practically show this by formally transferring Lagrange’s four-square theorem, Fermat 3-4, and other theorems between the foundations in the Isabelle framework.
Cite as

Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, and Karol Pąk. Higher-Order Tarski Grothendieck as a Foundation for Formal Proof. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 9:1-9:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brown_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.9,
  author =	{Brown, Chad E. and Kaliszyk, Cezary and P\k{a}k, Karol},
  title =	{{Higher-Order Tarski Grothendieck as a Foundation for Formal Proof}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110643},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: model, higher-order, Tarski Grothendieck, proof foundation}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 11 Document/PDF
  • 6 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 6 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 2 2023
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2019

  • Refine by Author
  • 4 Brown, Chad E.
  • 3 Kaliszyk, Cezary
  • 3 Urban, Josef
  • 2 Gauthier, Thibault
  • 1 Ashlagi, Itai
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 10 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 3 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Higher order logic
  • 1 Applied computing → Bioinformatics
  • 1 Computing methodologies
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Automated Reasoning
  • 1 Algorithmic Game Theory
  • 1 Automated theorem proving
  • 1 Blockchain
  • 1 CEGAR
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact