28 Search Results for "Lincoln, Andrea"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79
Mind the Gap. Doubling Constant Parametrization of Weighted Problems: TSP, Max-Cut, and More

Authors: Mihail Stoian

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Despite much research, hard weighted problems still resist super-polynomial improvements over their textbook solution. On the other hand, the unweighted versions of these problems have recently witnessed the sought-after speedups. Currently, the only way to repurpose the algorithm of the unweighted version for the weighted version is to employ a polynomial embedding of the input weights. This, however, introduces a pseudo-polynomial factor into the running time, which becomes impractical for arbitrarily weighted instances. In this paper, we introduce a new way to repurpose the algorithm of the unweighted problem. Specifically, we show that the time complexity of several well-known NP-hard problems operating over the (min, +) and (max, +) semirings, such as TSP, Weighted Max-Cut, and Edge-Weighted k-Clique, is proportional to that of their unweighted versions when the set of input weights has small doubling. We achieve this by a meta-algorithm that converts the input weights into polynomially bounded integers using the recent constructive Freiman’s theorem by Randolph and Węgrzycki [ESA 2024] before applying the polynomial embedding.
Cite as

Mihail Stoian. Mind the Gap. Doubling Constant Parametrization of Weighted Problems: TSP, Max-Cut, and More. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 79:1-79:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{stoian:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79,
  author =	{Stoian, Mihail},
  title =	{{Mind the Gap. Doubling Constant Parametrization of Weighted Problems: TSP, Max-Cut, and More}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{79:1--79:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255680},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79},
  annote =	{Keywords: doubling constant parametrization, weighted problems, traveling salesman, weighted max-cut, edge-weighted k-clique}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28
Conditional Complexity Hardness: Monotone Circuit Size, Matrix Rigidity, and Tensor Rank

Authors: Nikolai Chukhin, Alexander S. Kulikov, Ivan Mihajlin, and Arina Smirnova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Proving complexity lower bounds remains a challenging task: currently, we only know how to prove conditional uniform (algorithm) lower bounds and nonuniform (circuit) lower bounds in restricted circuit models. About a decade ago, Williams (STOC 2010) showed how to derive nonuniform lower bounds from uniform upper bounds: roughly, by designing a fast algorithm for checking satisfiability of circuits, one gets a lower bound for this circuit class. Since then, a number of results of this kind have been proved. For example, Jahanjou et al. (ICALP 2015) and Carmosino et al. (ITCS 2016) proved that if NSETH fails, then E^{NP} has series-parallel circuit size ω(n). One can also derive nonuniform lower bounds from nondeterministic uniform lower bounds. Perhaps the most well-known example is the Karp-Lipton theorem (STOC 1980): if Σ₂ ≠ Π₂, then NP ⊄ P/poly. Some recent examples include the following. Nederlof (STOC 2020) proved a lower bound on the matrix multiplication tensor rank under an assumption that TSP cannot be solved faster than in 2ⁿ time. Belova et al. (SODA 2024) proved that there exists an explicit polynomial family of arithmetic circuit size Ω(n^{δ}), for any δ > 0, assuming that MAX-3-SAT cannot be solved faster than in 2ⁿ nondeterministic time. Williams (FOCS 2024) proved an exponential lower bound for ETHR ∘ ETHR circuits under the Orthogonal Vectors conjecture. Whereas all the lower bounds above are proved under strong assumptions that might eventually be refuted, the revealed connections are of great interest and may still give further insights: one may be able to weaken the used assumptions or to construct generators from other fine-grained reductions. In this paper, we continue developing this line of research and show how uniform nondeterministic lower bounds can be used to construct generators of various types of combinatorial objects that are notoriously hard to analyze: Boolean functions of high circuit size, matrices of high rigidity, and tensors of high rank. Specifically, we prove the following. - If, for some ε and k, k-SAT cannot be solved in input-oblivious co-nondeterministic time O(2^{(1/2+ε)n}), then there exists a monotone Boolean function family in coNP of monotone circuit size 2^{Ω(n / log n)}. Combining this with the result above, we get win-win circuit lower bounds: either E^{NP{}} requires series-parallel circuits of size ω(n) or coNP requires monotone circuits of size 2^{Ω(n / log n)}. - If, for all ε > 0, MAX-3-SAT cannot be solved in co-nondeterministic time O(2^{(1 - ε)n}), then there exist small families of matrices with rigidity exceeding the best known constructions as well as small families of three-dimensional tensors of rank n^{1+Δ}, for some Δ > 0.
Cite as

Nikolai Chukhin, Alexander S. Kulikov, Ivan Mihajlin, and Arina Smirnova. Conditional Complexity Hardness: Monotone Circuit Size, Matrix Rigidity, and Tensor Rank. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 28:1-28:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chukhin_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28,
  author =	{Chukhin, Nikolai and Kulikov, Alexander S. and Mihajlin, Ivan and Smirnova, Arina},
  title =	{{Conditional Complexity Hardness: Monotone Circuit Size, Matrix Rigidity, and Tensor Rank}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255177},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: computational complexity, circuit complexity, lower bounds, conditional lower bounds, monotone circuits, matrix rigidity, tensor rank, arithmetic circuits, fine-grained complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.102
Smoothed Analysis of Dynamic Graph Algorithms

Authors: Uri Meir and Ami Paz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Recent years have seen significant progress in the study of dynamic graph algorithms, and most notably, the introduction of strong lower bound techniques for them (e.g., Henzinger, Krinninger, Nanongkai and Saranurak, STOC 2015; Larsen and Yu, FOCS 2023). As worst-case analysis (adversarial inputs) may lead to the necessity of high running times, a natural question arises: in which cases are high running times really necessary, and in which cases these inputs merely manifest unique pathological cases? Early attempts to tackle this question were made by Nikoletseas, Reif, Spirakis and Yung (ICALP 1995) and by Alberts and Henzinger (Algorithmica 1998), who considered models with very little adversarial control over the inputs, and showed fast algorithms exist for them. The question was then overlooked for decades, until Henzinger, Lincoln and Saha (SODA 2022) recently addressed uniformly random inputs, and presented algorithms and impossibility results for several subgraph counting problems. To tackle the above question more thoroughly, we employ smoothed analysis, a celebrated framework introduced by Spielman and Teng (J. ACM, 2004). An input is proposed by an adversary but then a noisy version of it is processed by the algorithm instead. This model of inputs is parameterized by the amount of adversarial control, and fully interpolates between worst-case inputs and a uniformly random input. Doing so, we extend impossibility results for some problems to the smoothed model with only a minor quantitative loss. That is, we show that partially-adversarial inputs suffice to impose high running times for certain problems. In contrast, we show that other problems become easy even with the slightest amount of noise. In addition, we study the interplay between the adversary and the noise, leading to three natural models of smoothed inputs, for which we show a hierarchy of increasing difficulty stretching between the average-case and the worst-case complexities.
Cite as

Uri Meir and Ami Paz. Smoothed Analysis of Dynamic Graph Algorithms. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 102:1-102:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{meir_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.102,
  author =	{Meir, Uri and Paz, Ami},
  title =	{{Smoothed Analysis of Dynamic Graph Algorithms}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{102:1--102:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.102},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253896},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.102},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dynamic graph algorithms, Smoothed analysis, Shortest paths}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54
Non-Boolean OMv: One More Reason to Believe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems

Authors: Bingbing Hu and Adam Polak

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
Most of the known tight lower bounds for dynamic problems are based on the Online Boolean Matrix-Vector Multiplication (OMv) Hypothesis, which is not as well studied and understood as some more popular hypotheses in fine-grained complexity. It would be desirable to base hardness of dynamic problems on a more believable hypothesis. We propose analogues of the OMv Hypothesis for variants of matrix multiplication that are known to be harder than Boolean product in the offline setting, namely: equality, dominance, min-witness, min-max, and bounded monotone min-plus products. These hypotheses are a priori weaker assumptions than the standard (Boolean) OMv Hypothesis and yet we show that they are actually equivalent to it. This establishes the first such fine-grained equivalence class for dynamic problems.
Cite as

Bingbing Hu and Adam Polak. Non-Boolean OMv: One More Reason to Believe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 54:1-54:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hu_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54,
  author =	{Hu, Bingbing and Polak, Adam},
  title =	{{Non-Boolean OMv: One More Reason to Believe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{54:1--54:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245228},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.54},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fine-grained complexity, OMv hypothesis, reductions, equivalence class}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95
The Planted Orthogonal Vectors Problem

Authors: David Kühnemann, Adam Polak, and Alon Rosen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
In the k-Orthogonal Vectors (k-OV) problem we are given k sets, each containing n binary vectors of dimension d = n^o(1), and our goal is to pick one vector from each set so that at each coordinate at least one vector has a zero. It is a central problem in fine-grained complexity, conjectured to require n^{k-o(1)} time in the worst case. We propose a way to plant a solution among vectors with i.i.d. p-biased entries, for appropriately chosen p, so that the planted solution is the unique one. Our conjecture is that the resulting k-OV instances still require time n^{k-o(1)} to solve, on average. Our planted distribution has the property that any subset of strictly less than k vectors has the same marginal distribution as in the model distribution, consisting of i.i.d. p-biased random vectors. We use this property to give average-case search-to-decision reductions for k-OV.
Cite as

David Kühnemann, Adam Polak, and Alon Rosen. The Planted Orthogonal Vectors Problem. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 95:1-95:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kuhnemann_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95,
  author =	{K\"{u}hnemann, David and Polak, Adam and Rosen, Alon},
  title =	{{The Planted Orthogonal Vectors Problem}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{95:1--95:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245640},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95},
  annote =	{Keywords: Average-case complexity, fine-grained complexity, orthogonal vectors}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.74
Core-Sparse Monge Matrix Multiplication: Improved Algorithm and Applications

Authors: Paweł Gawrychowski, Egor Gorbachev, and Tomasz Kociumaka

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
Min-plus matrix multiplication is a fundamental tool for designing algorithms operating on distances in graphs and different problems solvable by dynamic programming. We know that, assuming the APSP hypothesis, no subcubic-time algorithm exists for the case of general matrices. However, in many applications the matrices admit certain structural properties that can be used to design faster algorithms. For example, when considering a planar graph, one often works with a Monge matrix A, meaning that the density matrix A^◻ has non-negative entries, that is, A^◻_{i,j} := A_{i+1,j} + A_{i,j+1} - A_{i,j} -A_{i+1,j+1} ≥ 0. The min-plus product of two n×n Monge matrices can be computed in 𝒪(n²) time using the famous SMAWK algorithm. In applications such as longest common subsequence, edit distance, and longest increasing subsequence, the matrices are even more structured, as observed by Tiskin [J. Discrete Algorithms, 2008]: they are (or can be converted to) simple unit-Monge matrices, meaning that the density matrix is a permutation matrix and, furthermore, the first column and the last row of the matrix consist of only zeroes. Such matrices admit an implicit representation of size 𝒪(n) and, as shown by Tiskin [SODA 2010 & Algorithmica, 2015], their min-plus product can be computed in 𝒪(nlog n) time. Russo [SPIRE 2010 & Theor. Comput. Sci., 2012] identified a general structural property of matrices that admit such efficient representation and min-plus multiplication algorithms: the core size δ, defined as the number of non-zero entries in the density matrices of the input and output matrices. He provided an adaptive implementation of the SMAWK algorithm that runs in 𝒪((n+δ)log³ n) or 𝒪((n+δ)log² n) time (depending on the representation of the input matrices). In this work, we further investigate the core size as the parameter that enables efficient min-plus matrix multiplication. On the combinatorial side, we provide a (linear) bound on the core size of the product matrix in terms of the core sizes of the input matrices. On the algorithmic side, we generalize Tiskin’s algorithm (but, arguably, with a more elementary analysis) to solve the core-sparse Monge matrix multiplication problem in 𝒪(n+δlog δ) ⊆ 𝒪(n + δ log n) time, matching the complexity for simple unit-Monge matrices. As witnessed by the recent work of Gorbachev and Kociumaka [STOC'25] for edit distance with integer weights, our generalization opens up the possibility of speed-ups for weighted sequence alignment problems. Furthermore, our multiplication algorithm is also capable of producing an efficient data structure for recovering the witness for any given entry of the output matrix. This allows us, for example, to preprocess an integer array of size n in Õ(n) time so that the longest increasing subsequence of any sub-array can be reconstructed in Õ(𝓁) time, where 𝓁 is the length of the reported subsequence. In comparison, Karthik C. S. and Rahul [arXiv, 2024] recently achieved 𝒪(𝓁+n^{1/2}polylog n)-time reporting after 𝒪(n^{3/2}polylog n)-time preprocessing.
Cite as

Paweł Gawrychowski, Egor Gorbachev, and Tomasz Kociumaka. Core-Sparse Monge Matrix Multiplication: Improved Algorithm and Applications. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 74:1-74:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gawrychowski_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.74,
  author =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Gorbachev, Egor and Kociumaka, Tomasz},
  title =	{{Core-Sparse Monge Matrix Multiplication: Improved Algorithm and Applications}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{74:1--74:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.74},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245427},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.74},
  annote =	{Keywords: Min-plus matrix multiplication, Monge matrix, longest increasing subsequence}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42
(Multivariate) k-SUM as Barrier to Succinct Computation

Authors: Geri Gokaj, Marvin Künnemann, Sabine Storandt, and Carina Truschel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
How does the time complexity of a problem change when the input is given succinctly rather than explicitly? We study this question for several geometric problems defined on a set X of N points in ℤ^d. As succinct representation, we choose a sumset (or Minkowski sum) representation: Instead of receiving X explicitly, we are given sets A,B of n points that define X as A+B = {a+b∣ a ∈ A,b ∈ B}. We investigate the fine-grained complexity of this succinct version for several Õ(N)-time computable geometric primitives. Remarkably, we can tie their complexity tightly to the complexity of corresponding k-SUM problems. Specifically, we introduce as All-ints 3-SUM(n,n,k) the following multivariate, multi-output variant of 3-SUM: given sets A,B of size n and set C of size k, determine for all c ∈ C whether there are a ∈ A and b ∈ B with a+b = c. We obtain the following results: 1) Succinct closest L_∞-pair requires time N^{1-o(1)} under the 3-SUM hypothesis, while succinct furthest L_∞-pair can be solved in time Õ(n). 2) Succinct bichromatic closest L_∞-Pair requires time N^{1-o(1)} iff the 4-SUM hypothesis holds. 3) The following problems are fine-grained equivalent to All-ints 3-SUM(n,n,k): succinct skyline computation in 2D with output size k and succinct batched orthogonal range search with k given ranges. This establishes conditionally tight Õ(min{nk, N})-time algorithms for these problems. We obtain further connections with All-ints 3-SUM(n,n,k) for succinctly computing independent sets in unit interval graphs. Thus, (Multivariate) k-SUM problems precisely capture the barrier for enabling sumset-succinct computation for various geometric primitives.
Cite as

Geri Gokaj, Marvin Künnemann, Sabine Storandt, and Carina Truschel. (Multivariate) k-SUM as Barrier to Succinct Computation. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 42:1-42:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gokaj_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42,
  author =	{Gokaj, Geri and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin and Storandt, Sabine and Truschel, Carina},
  title =	{{(Multivariate) k-SUM as Barrier to Succinct Computation}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245101},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fine-grained complexity theory, sumsets, additive combinatorics, succinct inputs, computational geometry}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6
QSETH Strikes Again: Finer Quantum Lower Bounds for Lattice Problem, Strong Simulation, Hitting Set Problem, and More

Authors: Yanlin Chen, Yilei Chen, Rajendra Kumar, Subhasree Patro, and Florian Speelman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
Despite the wide range of problems for which quantum computers offer a computational advantage over their classical counterparts, there are also many problems for which the best known quantum algorithm provides a speedup that is only quadratic, or even subquadratic. Such a situation could also be desirable if we don't want quantum computers to solve certain problems fast - say problems relevant to post-quantum cryptography. When searching for algorithms and when analyzing the security of cryptographic schemes, we would like to have evidence that these problems are difficult to solve on quantum computers; but how do we assess the exact complexity of these problems? For most problems, there are no known ways to directly prove time lower bounds, however it can still be possible to relate the hardness of disparate problems to show conditional lower bounds. This approach has been popular in the classical community, and is being actively developed for the quantum case [Aaronson et al., 2020; Buhrman et al., 2021; Harry Buhrman et al., 2022; Andris Ambainis et al., 2022]. In this paper, by the use of the QSETH framework [Buhrman et al., 2021] we are able to understand the quantum complexity of a few natural variants of CNFSAT, such as parity-CNFSAT or counting-CNFSAT, and also are able to comment on the non-trivial complexity of approximate versions of counting-CNFSAT. Without considering such variants, the best quantum lower bounds will always be quadratically lower than the equivalent classical bounds, because of Grover’s algorithm; however, we are able to show that quantum algorithms will likely not attain even a quadratic speedup for many problems. These results have implications for the complexity of (variations of) lattice problems, the strong simulation and hitting set problems, and more. In the process, we explore the QSETH framework in greater detail and present a useful guide on how to effectively use the QSETH framework.
Cite as

Yanlin Chen, Yilei Chen, Rajendra Kumar, Subhasree Patro, and Florian Speelman. QSETH Strikes Again: Finer Quantum Lower Bounds for Lattice Problem, Strong Simulation, Hitting Set Problem, and More. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 6:1-6:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6,
  author =	{Chen, Yanlin and Chen, Yilei and Kumar, Rajendra and Patro, Subhasree and Speelman, Florian},
  title =	{{QSETH Strikes Again: Finer Quantum Lower Bounds for Lattice Problem, Strong Simulation, Hitting Set Problem, and More}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243723},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum conditional lower bounds, Fine-grained complexity, Lattice problems, Quantum strong simulation, Hitting set problem, QSETH}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.49
On the I/O Complexity of the Cocke-Younger-Kasami Algorithm and of a Family of Related Dynamic Programming Algorithms

Authors: Lorenzo De Stefani and Vedant Gupta

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 349, 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)

Abstract
Asymptotically tight lower bounds are derived for the Input/Output (I/O) complexity of a class of dynamic programming algorithms, including matrix chain multiplication, optimal polygon triangulation, and the construction of optimal binary search trees. Assuming no recomputation of intermediate values, we establish an Ω(n³/(√M B)) I/O lower bound, where n denotes the size of the input and M denotes the size of the available fast memory (cache). When recomputation is allowed, we show that the same bound holds for M < cn, where c is a positive constant. In the case where M ≥ 2n, we show an Ω(n/B) I/O lower bound. We also discuss algorithms for which the number of executed I/O operations matches asymptotically each of the presented lower bounds, which are thus asymptotically tight. Additionally, we refine our general method to obtain a lower bound for the I/O complexity of the Cocke-Younger-Kasami algorithm, where the size of the grammar impacts the I/O complexity. An upper bound with asymptotically matching performance in many cases is also provided.
Cite as

Lorenzo De Stefani and Vedant Gupta. On the I/O Complexity of the Cocke-Younger-Kasami Algorithm and of a Family of Related Dynamic Programming Algorithms. In 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 349, pp. 49:1-49:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{destefani_et_al:LIPIcs.WADS.2025.49,
  author =	{De Stefani, Lorenzo and Gupta, Vedant},
  title =	{{On the I/O Complexity of the Cocke-Younger-Kasami Algorithm and of a Family of Related Dynamic Programming Algorithms}},
  booktitle =	{19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)},
  pages =	{49:1--49:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-398-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{349},
  editor =	{Morin, Pat and Oh, Eunjin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.49},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242800},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.49},
  annote =	{Keywords: I/O complexity, Dynamic Programming Algorithms, Lower Bounds, Recomputation, Cocke-Younger-Kasami}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.78
The Role of Regularity in (Hyper-)Clique Detection and Implications for Optimizing Boolean CSPs

Authors: Nick Fischer, Marvin Künnemann, Mirza Redžić, and Julian Stieß

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
Is detecting a k-clique in k-partite regular (hyper-)graphs as hard as in the general case? Intuition suggests yes, but proving this - especially for hypergraphs - poses notable challenges. Concretely, we consider a strong notion of regularity in h-uniform hypergraphs, where we essentially require that any subset of at most h-1 is incident to a uniform number of hyperedges. Such notions are studied intensively in the combinatorial block design literature. We show that any f(k)n^{g(k)}-time algorithm for detecting k-cliques in such graphs transfers to an f'(k)n^{g(k)}-time algorithm for the general case, establishing a fine-grained equivalence between the h-uniform hyperclique hypothesis and its natural regular analogue. Equipped with this regularization result, we then fully resolve the fine-grained complexity of optimizing Boolean constraint satisfaction problems over assignments with k non-zeros. Our characterization depends on the maximum degree d of a constraint function. Specifically, if d ≤ 1, we obtain a linear-time solvable problem, if d = 2, the time complexity is essentially equivalent to k-clique detection, and if d ≥ 3 the problem requires exhaustive-search time under the 3-uniform hyperclique hypothesis. To obtain our hardness results, the regularization result plays a crucial role, enabling a very convenient approach when applied carefully. We believe that our regularization result will find further applications in the future.
Cite as

Nick Fischer, Marvin Künnemann, Mirza Redžić, and Julian Stieß. The Role of Regularity in (Hyper-)Clique Detection and Implications for Optimizing Boolean CSPs. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 78:1-78:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fischer_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.78,
  author =	{Fischer, Nick and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin and Red\v{z}i\'{c}, Mirza and Stie{\ss}, Julian},
  title =	{{The Role of Regularity in (Hyper-)Clique Detection and Implications for Optimizing Boolean CSPs}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{78:1--78:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.78},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234559},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.78},
  annote =	{Keywords: fine-grained complexity theory, clique detections in hypergraphs, constraint satisfaction, parameterized algorithms}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.81
Worst-Case and Average-Case Hardness of Hypercycle and Database Problems

Authors: Cheng-Hao Fu, Andrea Lincoln, and Rene Reyes

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
In this paper we present tight lower-bounds and new upper-bounds for hypergraph and database problems. We give tight lower-bounds for finding minimum hypercycles. We give tight lower-bounds for a substantial regime of unweighted hypercycle. We also give a new faster algorithm for longer unweighted hypercycles. We give a worst-case to average-case reduction from detecting a subgraph of a hypergraph in the worst-case to counting subgraphs of hypergraphs in the average-case. We demonstrate two applications of this worst-case to average-case reduction, which result in average-case lower bounds for counting counting hypercycles in random hypergraphs and queries in average-case databases. Our tight upper and lower bounds for hypercycle detection in the worst-case have immediate implications for the average-case via our worst-case to average-case reductions.
Cite as

Cheng-Hao Fu, Andrea Lincoln, and Rene Reyes. Worst-Case and Average-Case Hardness of Hypercycle and Database Problems. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 81:1-81:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fu_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.81,
  author =	{Fu, Cheng-Hao and Lincoln, Andrea and Reyes, Rene},
  title =	{{Worst-Case and Average-Case Hardness of Hypercycle and Database Problems}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{81:1--81:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.81},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234581},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.81},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hypergraphs, hypercycles, fine-grained complexity, average-case complexity, databases}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.93
On Incremental Approximate Shortest Paths in Directed Graphs

Authors: Adam Górkiewicz and Adam Karczmarz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we show new data structures maintaining approximate shortest paths in sparse directed graphs with polynomially bounded non-negative edge weights under edge insertions. We give more efficient incremental (1+ε)-approximate APSP data structures that work against an adaptive adversary: a deterministic one with Õ(m^{3/2}n^{3/4}) total update time and a randomized one with Õ(m^{4/3}n^{5/6}) total update time. For sparse graphs, these both improve polynomially upon the best-known bound against an adaptive adversary [Karczmarz and Łącki, ESA 2019]. To achieve that, building on the ideas of [Chechik and Zhang, SODA 2021] and [Kyng, Meierhans and Probst Gutenberg, SODA 2022], we show a near-optimal (1+ε)-approximate incremental SSSP data structure for a special case when all edge updates are adjacent to the source, that might be of independent interest. We also describe a very simple and near-optimal offline incremental (1+ε)-approximate SSSP data structure. While online near-linear partially dynamic SSSP data structures have been elusive so far (except for dense instances), our result excludes using certain types of impossibility arguments to rule them out. Additionally, our offline solution leads to near-optimal and deterministic all-pairs bounded-leg shortest paths data structure for sparse graphs.
Cite as

Adam Górkiewicz and Adam Karczmarz. On Incremental Approximate Shortest Paths in Directed Graphs. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 93:1-93:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gorkiewicz_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.93,
  author =	{G\'{o}rkiewicz, Adam and Karczmarz, Adam},
  title =	{{On Incremental Approximate Shortest Paths in Directed Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{93:1--93:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.93},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234700},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.93},
  annote =	{Keywords: dynamic shortest paths, incremental shortest paths, offline dynamic algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.30
In-Memory Object Graph Stores

Authors: Aditya Thimmaiah, Zijian Yi, Joseph Kenis, Christopher J Rossbach, and Milos Gligoric

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
We present a design and implementation of an in-memory object graph store, dubbed εStore. Our key innovation is a storage model - epsilon store - that equates an object on the heap to a node in a graph store. Thus any object on the heap (without changes) can be a part of one, or multiple, graph stores, and vice versa, any node in a graph store can be accessed like any other object on the heap. Specifically, each node in a graph is an object (i.e., instance of a class), and its properties and its edges are the primitive and reference fields declared in its class, respectively. Necessary classes, which are instantiated to represent nodes, are created dynamically by εStore. εStore uses a subset of the Cypher query language to query the graph store. By design, the result of any query is a table (ResultSet) of references to objects on the heap, which users can manipulate the same way as any other object on the heap in their programs. Moreover, a developer can include (transitively) an arbitrary object to become a part of a graph store. Finally, εStore introduces compile-time rewriting of Cypher queries into imperative code to improve the runtime performance. εStore can be used for a number of tasks including implementing methods for complex in-memory structures, writing complex assertions, or a stripped down version of a graph database that can conveniently be used during testing. We implement εStore in Java and show its application using the aforementioned tasks.
Cite as

Aditya Thimmaiah, Zijian Yi, Joseph Kenis, Christopher J Rossbach, and Milos Gligoric. In-Memory Object Graph Stores. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 30:1-30:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{thimmaiah_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.30,
  author =	{Thimmaiah, Aditya and Yi, Zijian and Kenis, Joseph and Rossbach, Christopher J and Gligoric, Milos},
  title =	{{In-Memory Object Graph Stores}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233225},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: Object stores, Graph stores, Cypher}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10
Count on Your Elders: Laplace vs Gaussian Noise

Authors: Joel Daniel Andersson, Rasmus Pagh, Teresa Anna Steiner, and Sahel Torkamani

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
In recent years, Gaussian noise has become a popular tool in differentially private algorithms, often replacing Laplace noise which dominated the early literature on differential privacy. Gaussian noise is the standard approach to approximate differential privacy, often resulting in much higher utility than traditional (pure) differential privacy mechanisms. In this paper we argue that Laplace noise may in fact be preferable to Gaussian noise in many settings, in particular when we seek to achieve (ε,δ)-differential privacy for small values of δ. We consider two scenarios: First, we consider the problem of counting under continual observation and present a new generalization of the binary tree mechanism that uses a k-ary number system with negative digits to improve the privacy-accuracy trade-off. Our mechanism uses Laplace noise and whenever δ is sufficiently small it improves the mean squared error over the best possible (ε,δ)-differentially private factorization mechanisms based on Gaussian noise. Specifically, using k = 19 we get an asymptotic improvement over the bound given in the work by Henzinger, Upadhyay and Upadhyay (SODA 2023) when δ = O(T^{-0.92}). Second, we show that the noise added by the Gaussian mechanism can always be replaced by Laplace noise of comparable variance for the same (ε, δ)-differential privacy guarantee, and in fact for sufficiently small δ the variance of the Laplace noise becomes strictly better. This challenges the conventional wisdom that Gaussian noise should be used for high-dimensional noise. Finally, we study whether counting under continual observation may be easier in an average-case sense than in a worst-case sense. We show that, under pure differential privacy, the expected worst-case error for a random input must be Ω(log(T)/ε), matching the known lower bound for worst-case inputs.
Cite as

Joel Daniel Andersson, Rasmus Pagh, Teresa Anna Steiner, and Sahel Torkamani. Count on Your Elders: Laplace vs Gaussian Noise. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 10:1-10:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{andersson_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10,
  author =	{Andersson, Joel Daniel and Pagh, Rasmus and Steiner, Teresa Anna and Torkamani, Sahel},
  title =	{{Count on Your Elders: Laplace vs Gaussian Noise}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231376},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, continual observation, streaming, prefix sums, trees}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.38
Backdoor Defense, Learnability and Obfuscation

Authors: Paul Christiano, Jacob Hilton, Victor Lecomte, and Mark Xu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We introduce a formal notion of defendability against backdoors using a game between an attacker and a defender. In this game, the attacker modifies a function to behave differently on a particular input known as the "trigger", while behaving the same almost everywhere else. The defender then attempts to detect the trigger at evaluation time. If the defender succeeds with high enough probability, then the function class is said to be defendable. The key constraint on the attacker that makes defense possible is that the attacker’s strategy must work for a randomly-chosen trigger. Our definition is simple and does not explicitly mention learning, yet we demonstrate that it is closely connected to learnability. In the computationally unbounded setting, we use a voting algorithm of [Hanneke et al., 2022] to show that defendability is essentially determined by the VC dimension of the function class, in much the same way as PAC learnability. In the computationally bounded setting, we use a similar argument to show that efficient PAC learnability implies efficient defendability, but not conversely. On the other hand, we use indistinguishability obfuscation to show that the class of polynomial size circuits is not efficiently defendable. Finally, we present polynomial size decision trees as a natural example for which defense is strictly easier than learning. Thus, we identify efficient defendability as a notable intermediate concept in between efficient learnability and obfuscation.
Cite as

Paul Christiano, Jacob Hilton, Victor Lecomte, and Mark Xu. Backdoor Defense, Learnability and Obfuscation. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 38:1-38:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{christiano_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.38,
  author =	{Christiano, Paul and Hilton, Jacob and Lecomte, Victor and Xu, Mark},
  title =	{{Backdoor Defense, Learnability and Obfuscation}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226662},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: backdoors, machine learning, PAC learning, indistinguishability obfuscation}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 28 Document/PDF
  • 17 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 15 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2021
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 9 Lincoln, Andrea
  • 5 Vassilevska Williams, Virginia
  • 3 Künnemann, Marvin
  • 3 Polak, Adam
  • 2 Gokaj, Geri
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 27 LIPIcs
  • 1 LITES

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • 4 Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis
  • 3 Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
  • 3 Theory of computation → Dynamic graph algorithms
  • 2 Theory of computation → Complexity classes
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 fine-grained complexity
  • 3 Fine-grained complexity
  • 2 3SUM
  • 2 Algorithms
  • 2 Fine-grained Complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact