11 Search Results for "Castellan, Simon"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.LICS.2026.25
Lazy Intermediate Representations for Algebraic Effects

Authors: Simon Castellan and Hugo Paquet

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 380, 41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2026)

Abstract
A lazy program interpreter postpones computation until the result is actually needed. This is typically more efficient than an eager (or call-by-value) interpreter, but a concern is that the semantics is not generally preserved. We propose a new semantic analysis of lazy evaluation that relies on a subtle combination of name generation and read-only state. Our perspective is that laziness arises from a hybrid evaluation strategy, in which only the name generation follows call-by-value. This semantic model suggests better intermediate representations of sum and product types in a lazy interpreter, along with equations that justify further optimizations. We illustrate this with an implementation in OCaml. Our motivation is practical: the origin of this work is a real-world application of discrete probabilistic programming, in which large algebraic data types cause significant performance issues with a call-by-value interpreter. Our lazy semantics justifies better optimized representations, and provides principled foundations for other methods involving laziness in probabilistic programming.
Cite as

Simon Castellan and Hugo Paquet. Lazy Intermediate Representations for Algebraic Effects. In 41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 380, pp. 25:1-25:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{castellan_et_al:LIPIcs.LICS.2026.25,
  author =	{Castellan, Simon and Paquet, Hugo},
  title =	{{Lazy Intermediate Representations for Algebraic Effects}},
  booktitle =	{41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2026)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-434-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{380},
  editor =	{Faggian, Claudia and Katoen, Joost-Pieter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.LICS.2026.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-268124},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.LICS.2026.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: Categorical semantics, lazy evaluation, interpreter, probabilistic programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.LICS.2026.79
Wiring the π-Calculus to Denotational Semantics

Authors: Ken Sakayori, Davide Sangiorgi, Simon Castellan, and Pierre Clairambault

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 380, 41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2026)

Abstract
We introduce a dialect of the Asynchronous π-calculus, called AWπ, in which (1) an input name may be owned, at any time, by at most one process; (2) each name has either only the input or only the output capability. As a result, special processes called wires (aka forwarders, that is, processes that receive values at one name and re-transmit) behave as substitutions when composed with any AWπ process. Thus AWπ naturally yields a category, whose morphisms are AWπ processes (modulo the reference behavioural equivalence, barbed congruence) and whose objects are types; and where wires act as identity morphisms. We show that the category of processes can be further organised into (sub)categories with the structures needed for the interpretation of common higher-order language features in the literature by drawing on insights from game semantics; notably, we construct a relative Seely category, the categorical structure that concurrent game semantics has. At the same time, AWπ follows the tradition of ordinary π-calculi in that expressiveness is preserved and the operational and algebraic theory are developed in a similar manner, notwithstanding substantial technical differences in their development and proofs. In short, the goal of AWπ is to remain faithful to the operational and algebraic tradition of the π-calculi while connecting to the tradition of denotational models for programming languages.
Cite as

Ken Sakayori, Davide Sangiorgi, Simon Castellan, and Pierre Clairambault. Wiring the π-Calculus to Denotational Semantics. In 41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 380, pp. 79:1-79:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sakayori_et_al:LIPIcs.LICS.2026.79,
  author =	{Sakayori, Ken and Sangiorgi, Davide and Castellan, Simon and Clairambault, Pierre},
  title =	{{Wiring the \pi-Calculus to Denotational Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{41st Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2026)},
  pages =	{79:1--79:28},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-434-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{380},
  editor =	{Faggian, Claudia and Katoen, Joost-Pieter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.LICS.2026.79},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-268669},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.LICS.2026.79},
  annote =	{Keywords: \pi-calculus, denotational semantics, game semantics, wire process}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40
The Groupoid-Syntax of Type Theory Is a Set

Authors: Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, and Szumi Xie

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Categories with families (CwFs) have been used to define the semantics of type theory in type theory. In the setting of Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT), one of the limitations of the traditional notion of CwFs is the requirement to set-truncate types, which excludes models based on univalent categories, such as the standard set model. To address this limitation, we introduce the concept of a Groupoid Category with Families (GCwF). This framework truncates types at the groupoid level and incorporates coherence equations, providing a natural extension of the CwF framework when starting from a 1-category. We demonstrate that the initial GCwF for a type theory with a base family of sets and Π-types (groupoid-syntax) is set-truncated. Consequently, this allows us to utilize the conventional intrinsic syntax of type theory while enabling interpretations in semantically richer and more natural models. All constructions in this paper were formalised in Cubical Agda.
Cite as

Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi, and Szumi Xie. The Groupoid-Syntax of Type Theory Is a Set. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 40:1-40:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{altenkirch_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40,
  author =	{Altenkirch, Thorsten and Kaposi, Ambrus and Xie, Szumi},
  title =	{{The Groupoid-Syntax of Type Theory Is a Set}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{40:1--40:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254650},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.40},
  annote =	{Keywords: Categorical models of type theory, category with families, groupoids, coherence, homotopy type theory}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4
Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics (Invited Talk)

Authors: Pierre Clairambault

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Quantitative semantics are those denotational semantics that inherit from linear logic [Jean-Yves Girard, 1987] a sensitivity to the multiplicity of resources involved in computation. Those include the relational model [Jean-Yves Girard, 1987] and its numerous variations (such as finiteness spaces [Thomas Ehrhard, 2005], weighted relational models [Jim Laird et al., 2013] and their extensions [Thomas Ehrhard et al., 2011; Thomas Ehrhard, 2002], generalized species of structure [Fiore et al., 2008], span models [Paul-André Melliès, 2019; Pierre Clairambault and Simon Forest, 2023], etc), as well as related syntactic methods such as non-idempotent intersection types [Daniel de Carvalho, 2018] and Taylor expansion of lambda-terms [Thomas Ehrhard and Laurent Regnier, 2003]. Interactive semantics are usually also quantitative, but in addition they present the interactive behaviour of proofs and programs, generally organized chronologically - those include the many variants of game semantics (starting with [J. M. E. Hyland and C.-H. Luke Ong, 2000; Samson Abramsky et al., 2000]), and other frameworks such as Geometry of Interaction [Girard, 1989] or ludics [Jean-Yves Girard, 2001]. Both families are cornerstones of modern denotational semantics, and both have associated Alonzo Church awards: game semantics in 2017, and quantitative semantics (in particular, differential linear logic and the differential λ-calculus) in 2024. It has more or less always been clear to the experts that the two, sharing an origin in linear logic, are conceptually related. Yet there are differences, which seem fundamental: in particular, while quantitative models compose relationally, the composition of strategies follows an intricate "parallel interaction plus hiding" process inspired from concurrency theory [Abramsky, 1997]. The two families of models have also historically targeted different kinds of languages: whereas quantitative semantics focused on theoretical calculi (and the λ-calculus in particular), game semantics is known for fully abstract models for languages with elaborate combinations of effects including local state [Samson Abramsky and Guy McCusker, 1996], control operators [James Laird, 1997], and concurrent primitives [Dan R. Ghica and Andrzej S. Murawski, 2008]. Early on, researchers have explored the relationship between the two [Thomas Ehrhard, 1996; Patrick Baillot et al., 1997], and investigations on this question have spanned decades [Pierre Boudes, 2009; Ana C. Calderon and Guy McCusker, 2010; Takeshi Tsukada and C.-H. Luke Ong, 2016; C.-H. Luke Ong, 2017]. In particular, Melliès' work on asynchronous games [Paul-André Melliès, 2006; Paul-André Melliès, 2005] made significant conceptual contributions, showing that the issue was enlightened by adopting a positional formulation of game semantics, where points in the relational model simply arise as certain positions. This talk surveys recent developments in this line of work, shedding light on the connection between those two families. Our work is set in so-called "thin concurrent games" [Simon Castellan et al., 2019; Pierre Clairambault, 2024], an extension with symmetry of Rideau and Winskel’s concurrent games on event structures [Silvain Rideau and Glynn Winskel, 2011]. Event structures being one of the main "truly concurrent" models of concurrency [Glynn Winskel, 1986], it is perhaps expected that thin concurrent games can model concurrent languages: they provide a truly concurrent refinement of Ghica and Murawski’s fully abstract model of Idealized Concurrent Algol [Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault, 2024; Pierre Clairambault, 2024]. But beyond the semantics of concurrency, thin concurrent games are also a deep reworking on game semantics built from causal principles, inheriting from asynchronous games a positional flavour. In thin concurrent games, strategies have a dual nature: an event-based nature where they appear as certain event structures composed via parallel interaction plus hiding; or a positional nature where they appear as certain spans of groupoids, composed by pullback (modulo a technical condition on strategies called visibility) - they can be regarded both as a games and a relational model! Leveraging this dual nature, in a sequence of papers with Castellan, de Visme, Olimpieri and Paquet, we have been able to link the single framework of thin concurrent games with numerous other models. This includes various traditional alternating or non-alternating games models [Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault, 2024; Pierre Clairambault, 2024], the weighted relational model [Pierre Clairambault and Hugo Paquet, 2021], the quantum relational model [Pierre Clairambault and Marc de Visme, 2020], generalized species of structure [Pierre Clairambault et al., 2023], and - going beyond quantitative semantics - the linear Scott model [Clairambault, 2025], a linear decomposition of standard Scott domain semantics [Thomas Ehrhard, 2012]. All these distinct models are obtained by projecting away certain aspects of thin concurrent games, giving some support to the claim that thin concurrent games are a Rosetta stone for interactive and quantitative semantics.
Cite as

Pierre Clairambault. Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics (Invited Talk). In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 4:1-4:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{clairambault:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4,
  author =	{Clairambault, Pierre},
  title =	{{Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254286},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Denotational semantics, Game semantics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.23
First-Order Store and Visibility in Name-Passing Calculi

Authors: Daniel Hirschkoff, Iwan Quémerais, and Davide Sangiorgi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
The π-calculus is the paradigmatical name-passing calculus. While being purely name-passing, it allows the representation of higher-order functions and store. We study how π-calculus processes can be controlled so that computations can only involve storage of first-order values. The discipline is enforced by a type system that is based on the notion of visibility, coming from game semantics. We discuss the impact of visibility on the behavioural theory. We propose characterisations of may-testing and barbed equivalence, based on (variants of) trace equivalence and labelled bisimilarity, in the case where computation is sequential, and in the case where computation is well-bracketed.
Cite as

Daniel Hirschkoff, Iwan Quémerais, and Davide Sangiorgi. First-Order Store and Visibility in Name-Passing Calculi. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 23:1-23:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hirschkoff_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.23,
  author =	{Hirschkoff, Daniel and Qu\'{e}merais, Iwan and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  title =	{{First-Order Store and Visibility in Name-Passing Calculi}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239737},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: process calculi, behavioural equivalence, type system}
}
Document
Pearl/Brave New Idea
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.41
Shouting at Memory: Where Did My Write Go? (Pearl/Brave New Idea)

Authors: Vasileios Klimis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) promises persistent data, but verifying that promise on real hardware is challenging due to opaque caching and internal buffers like Intel’s WPQ, which obscure the true state of writes. Traditional validation methods often fall short. This paper introduces a novel perspective: leveraging the subtle timing variations of memory accesses as a direct probe into write persistence. We present a software technique, inspired by echolocation, that uses high-resolution timers to measure memory load latencies. These timings act as distinct signatures ("echoes") revealing whether a write’s data resides in volatile caches or has reached the NVM persistence domain. This offers a non-invasive method to track write progression towards durability. To reliably interpret these potentially noisy timing signatures and systematically explore complex persistence behaviours, we integrate this echolocation probe into an active model learning framework. This synergy enables the automated inference of a system’s actual persistency semantics directly from black-box hardware observations. The approach is hardware-agnostic, adaptive, and scalable. Preliminary experiments on Intel x86 - a platform where persistence validation is notably challenged by the opaque Write Pending Queue (WPQ) - demonstrate the feasibility of our technique. We observed distinct latency clusters differentiating volatile cache accesses from those reaching the persistence domain. This combined approach offers a promising path towards robust and automated validation of NVM persistency across diverse architectures.
Cite as

Vasileios Klimis. Shouting at Memory: Where Did My Write Go? (Pearl/Brave New Idea). In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 41:1-41:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{klimis:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.41,
  author =	{Klimis, Vasileios},
  title =	{{Shouting at Memory: Where Did My Write Go?}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{41:1--41:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.41},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233339},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.41},
  annote =	{Keywords: Persistency Memory Semantics, Fuzz Testing, Model Learning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2019.9
Causal Unfoldings

Authors: Marc de Visme and Glynn Winskel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 139, 8th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2019)

Abstract
In the simplest form of event structure, a prime event structure, an event is associated with a unique causal history, its prime cause. However, it is quite common for an event to have disjunctive causes in that it can be enabled by any one of multiple sets of causes. Sometimes the sets of causes may be mutually exclusive, inconsistent one with another, and sometimes not, in which case they coexist consistently and constitute parallel causes of the event. The established model of general event structures can model parallel causes. On occasion however such a model abstracts too far away from the precise causal histories of events to be directly useful. For example, sometimes one needs to associate probabilities with different, possibly coexisting, causal histories of a common event. Ideally, the causal histories of a general event structure would correspond to the configurations of its causal unfolding to a prime event structure; and the causal unfolding would arise as a right adjoint to the embedding of prime in general event structures. But there is no such adjunction. However, a slight extension of prime event structures remedies this defect and provides a causal unfolding as a universal construction. Prime event structures are extended with an equivalence relation in order to dissociate the two roles, that of an event and its enabling; in effect, prime causes are labelled by a disjunctive event, an equivalence class of its prime causes. With this enrichment a suitable causal unfolding appears as a pseudo right adjoint. The adjunction relies critically on the central and subtle notion of extremal causal realisation as an embodiment of causal history.
Cite as

Marc de Visme and Glynn Winskel. Causal Unfoldings. In 8th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 139, pp. 9:1-9:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{devisme_et_al:LIPIcs.CALCO.2019.9,
  author =	{de Visme, Marc and Winskel, Glynn},
  title =	{{Causal Unfoldings}},
  booktitle =	{8th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2019)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-120-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{139},
  editor =	{Roggenbach, Markus and Sokolova, Ana},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2019.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-114376},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2019.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Event Structures, Parallel Causes, Causal Unfolding, Probability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.81
Distributed Strategies Made Easy

Authors: Simon Castellan, Pierre Clairambault, and Glynn Winskel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 83, 42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2017)

Abstract
Distributed/concurrent strategies have been introduced as special maps of event structures. As such they factor through their "rigid images," themselves strategies. By concentrating on such "rigid image" strategies we are able to give an elementary account of distributed strategies and their composition, resulting in a category of games and strategies. This is in contrast to the usual development where composition involves the pullback of event structures explicitly and results in a bicategory. It is shown how, in this simpler setting, to extend strategies to probabilistic strategies; and indicated how through probability we can track nondeterministic branching behaviour, that one might otherwise think lost irrevocably in restricting attention to "rigid image" strategies.
Cite as

Simon Castellan, Pierre Clairambault, and Glynn Winskel. Distributed Strategies Made Easy. In 42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 83, pp. 81:1-81:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{castellan_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.81,
  author =	{Castellan, Simon and Clairambault, Pierre and Winskel, Glynn},
  title =	{{Distributed Strategies Made Easy}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2017)},
  pages =	{81:1--81:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-046-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{83},
  editor =	{Larsen, Kim G. and Bodlaender, Hans L. and Raskin, Jean-Francois},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.81},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-81315},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.81},
  annote =	{Keywords: Games, Strategies, Event Structures, Probability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.12
Observably Deterministic Concurrent Strategies and Intensional Full Abstraction for Parallel-or

Authors: Simon Castellan, Pierre Clairambault, and Glynn Winskel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 84, 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)

Abstract
Although Plotkin’s parallel-or is inherently deterministic, it has a non-deterministic interpretation in games based on (prime) event structures - in which an event has a unique causal history - because they do not directly support disjunctive causality. General event structures can express disjunctive causality and have a more permissive notion of determinism, but do not support hiding. We show that (structures equivalent to) deterministic general event structures do support hiding, and construct a new category of games based on them with a deterministic interpretation of aPCFpor, an affine variant of PCF extended with parallel-or. We then exploit this deterministic interpretation to give a relaxed notion of determinism (observable determinism) on the plain event structures model. Putting this together with our previously introduced concurrent notions of well-bracketing and innocence, we obtain an intensionally fully abstract model of aPCFpor.
Cite as

Simon Castellan, Pierre Clairambault, and Glynn Winskel. Observably Deterministic Concurrent Strategies and Intensional Full Abstraction for Parallel-or. In 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 84, pp. 12:1-12:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{castellan_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.12,
  author =	{Castellan, Simon and Clairambault, Pierre and Winskel, Glynn},
  title =	{{Observably Deterministic Concurrent Strategies and Intensional Full Abstraction for Parallel-or}},
  booktitle =	{2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-047-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{84},
  editor =	{Miller, Dale},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-77219},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Game semantics, parallel-or, concurrent games, event structures, full abstraction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2016.32
Causality vs. Interleavings in Concurrent Game Semantics

Authors: Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 59, 27th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2016)

Abstract
We investigate relationships between interleaving and causal notions of game semantics for concurrent programming languages, focusing on the existence of canonical compact causal representations of the interleaving game semantics of programs. We perform our study on an affine variant of Idealized Parallel Algol (IPA), for which we present two games model: and interleaving model (an adaptation of Ghica and Murawski’s fully abstract games model for IPA up to may-testing), and a causal model (a variant of Rideau and Winskel’s games on event structures). Both models are sound and adequate for affine IPA. Then, we relate the two models. First we give a causality-forgetting operation mapping functorially the causal model to the interleaving one. We show that from an interleaving strategy we can reconstruct a causal strategy, from which it follows that the interleaving model is the observational quotient of the causal one. Then, we investigate several reconstructions of causal strategies from interleaving ones, showing finally that there are programs which are inherently causally ambiguous, with several distinct minimal causal representations.
Cite as

Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault. Causality vs. Interleavings in Concurrent Game Semantics. In 27th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 59, pp. 32:1-32:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{castellan_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2016.32,
  author =	{Castellan, Simon and Clairambault, Pierre},
  title =	{{Causality vs. Interleavings in Concurrent Game Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2016)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-017-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{59},
  editor =	{Desharnais, Jos\'{e}e and Jagadeesan, Radha},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2016.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-61620},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2016.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Game semantics, concurrency, causality, event structures}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.138
Undecidability of Equality in the Free Locally Cartesian Closed Category

Authors: Simon Castellan, Pierre Clairambault, and Peter Dybjer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 38, 13th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA 2015)

Abstract
We show that a version of Martin-Löf type theory with extensional identity, a unit type N1, Sigma, Pi, and a base type is a free category with families (supporting these type formers) both in a 1- and a 2-categorical sense. It follows that the underlying category of contexts is a free locally cartesian closed category in a 2-categorical sense because of a previously proved biequivalence. We then show that equality in this category is undecidable by reducing it to the undecidability of convertibility in combinatory logic.
Cite as

Simon Castellan, Pierre Clairambault, and Peter Dybjer. Undecidability of Equality in the Free Locally Cartesian Closed Category. In 13th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 38, pp. 138-152, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{castellan_et_al:LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.138,
  author =	{Castellan, Simon and Clairambault, Pierre and Dybjer, Peter},
  title =	{{Undecidability of Equality in the Free Locally Cartesian Closed Category}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA 2015)},
  pages =	{138--152},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-87-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{38},
  editor =	{Altenkirch, Thorsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.138},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-51602},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TLCA.2015.138},
  annote =	{Keywords: Extensional type theory, locally cartesian closed categories, undecidab- ility}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 11 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2026
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2019
  • 2 2017
  • 1 2016
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Castellan, Simon
  • 6 Clairambault, Pierre
  • 3 Winskel, Glynn
  • 2 Sangiorgi, Davide
  • 1 Altenkirch, Thorsten
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 11 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Denotational semantics
  • 2 Theory of computation → Categorical semantics
  • 2 Theory of computation → Process calculi
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Empirical software validation
  • 1 Theory of computation → Concurrency
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Game semantics
  • 2 Event Structures
  • 2 Probability
  • 2 event structures
  • 1 Categorical models of type theory
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact