10 Search Results for "Jin, Zhengzhong"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.19
Asymmetric Streaming Approximate Pattern Matching

Authors: Wojciech Janczewski and Tatiana Starikovskaya

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
We study the space complexity of pattern matching in the asymmetric streaming model, focusing on approximate pattern matching under the Hamming and edit distances. In this problem, we are given an m-length pattern and an n-length text and must compute, for every position of the text, the smallest distance between the pattern and a substring of the text which ends at this position. In the asymmetric streaming model, we assume to have constant-time random access to the pattern, while the text arrives as a stream, one letter at a time. It is known that computing all distances exactly in the asymmetric streaming model requires Ω(m) space (for the edit distance see Li and Zheng [FSTTCS 2021]). Hence, to achieve sublinear space, a relaxation of the problem is necessary. One possible variant is to consider the small distance regime, where the algorithm must compute only those distances that are bounded by a small integer parameter k. In this case, existing algorithms in a more restrictive fully streaming model (Kociumaka, Clifford, Porat [SODA'19], Bhattacharya, Koucký [ICALP'23]) straightforwardly imply the existence of poly(k, log n)-space asymmetric streaming algorithms. Another possible relaxation is computing all distances approximately. For this variant, we don't have small-space algorithms in the fully streaming model: the best known algorithm solves pattern matching under the Hamming distance (1+ε)-approximately using 𝒪̃(ε^{-2}√m) space (Starikovskaya, Svagerka, Uznański [APPROX'20]). For the edit distance, no efficient approximation algorithms are known. In this work, we show approximation algorithms for pattern matching under the Hamming and edit distances in the asymmetric streaming model for any constant ε > 0: 1) We show that there is a simple randomised asymmetric streaming algorithm that solves approximate pattern matching under the Hamming distance (1+ε)-approximately using 𝒪(ε^{-3}log³n) bits. 2) As our second and main contribution, we extend the result of Cheng et al. [ICALP 2021] and show that for any integer k there is a deterministic asymmetric streaming algorithm that solves pattern matching under the edit distance (2^k-1+ε)-approximately using 𝒪̃(m^{1/k}) space.
Cite as

Wojciech Janczewski and Tatiana Starikovskaya. Asymmetric Streaming Approximate Pattern Matching. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 19:1-19:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{janczewski_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.19,
  author =	{Janczewski, Wojciech and Starikovskaya, Tatiana},
  title =	{{Asymmetric Streaming Approximate Pattern Matching}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259458},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asymmetric streaming, Pattern matching, Approximation, Edit distance, Hamming distance}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.6
Model-Generic Incrementally Verifiable Computation from Updatable BARGs

Authors: Eden Aldema Tshuva and Rotem Oshman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Incrementally verifiable computation (IVC) is a computationally sound proof system that allows a prover to certify the correctness of a long or ongoing computation in an incremental manner, by repeatedly updating a proof certifying the computation so far. Updating the proof does not require access to the entire trace of the computation, which makes the IVC-prover memory efficient. Recently, such schemes were constructed for deterministic Turing machines from standard cryptographic assumptions (Paneth and Pass, FOCS 2022, and Devadas et al., FOCS 2022). In this work we generalize and extend IVC to support incremental certification and verifiability of a large set of computation models, focusing on distributed and online computation. This allows distributed algorithms to efficiently certify their own execution using low memory and communication overhead. We construct IVC for a variety of computation models by proving one generic lifting theorem from a classical (non-incremental) delegation scheme (also known as SNARG) into full-fledged IVC, while preserving the delegation scheme’s succinctness properties (up to an additive factor which is polynomial in the security parameter and independent of the size of the computation). Using this lifting theorem, we obtain IVC for the following computation models: - RAM and exclusive-read exclusive-write (EREW) PRAM algorithms, using existing delegation schemes for these models. - Streaming algorithms, using the natural memory-efficiency properties of the model. - Massively parallel computation (MPC). Notably, in this model, memory efficiency is a critical bottleneck: the machines participating in an MPC algorithm usually cannot store the entire trace of their computation. Thus, certifying MPC algorithms naturally benefits from IVC. Moreover, since prior to our work, no delegation scheme for this model was known, we also construct a delegation scheme for one-round massively parallel computations, and then apply our lifting theorem to it. - Distributed graph algorithms, using existing distributed delegation schemes (also known as locally verifiable distributed SNARGs). Here, in order to use our lifting theorem we have to first make some observations about the verification procedure of these existing schemes. At the heart of this work is a new abstraction, updatable batch arguments for NP (UpBARGs), which we define and construct. Standard BARGs allow one to prove a batch of k NP-statements using a proof whose length barely grows with k; however, the statements and their witnesses must all be known in advance. In contrast, UpBARGs support adding statements and witnesses on the fly, making them a flexible tool for constructing IVC across different computational models.
Cite as

Eden Aldema Tshuva and Rotem Oshman. Model-Generic Incrementally Verifiable Computation from Updatable BARGs. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 6:1-6:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aldematshuva_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.6,
  author =	{Aldema Tshuva, Eden and Oshman, Rotem},
  title =	{{Model-Generic Incrementally Verifiable Computation from Updatable BARGs}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252931},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: incrementally verifiable computation, massively parallel computation, streaming, parallel RAM, batch arguments, SNARG}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64
Optimal White-Box Adversarial Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating LIS Length

Authors: Anna Gal, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, and Huacheng Yu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The space complexity of deterministic streaming algorithms for approximating the length of the longest increasing subsequence (LIS) in a string of length n has been known to be Θ̃(√n) for almost two decades. In contrast, the space complexity of this problem for randomized streaming algorithms remains one of the few longstanding open problems in one-pass streaming. In fact, no better than Ω(log n) lower bounds are known, and the best upper bounds are no better than their deterministic counterparts. In this paper, we push the limits of our understanding of the streaming space complexity of the approximate LIS length problem by studying it in the white-box adversarial streaming model. This model is an intermediate model between deterministic and randomized streaming algorithms that has recently attracted attention. In the white-box model, the streaming algorithm can draw fresh randomness when processing each incoming element, but an adversary generating the stream observes all previously used randomness and adaptively chooses the subsequent elements of the stream. We prove a tight (up to logarithmic factors) Ω(√n) space lower bound for any white-box streaming algorithm that approximates the length of the LIS of a stream of length n to within a factor better than 1.1. Thus, for this problem, white-box algorithms offer no improvement over deterministic ones.
Cite as

Anna Gal, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, and Huacheng Yu. Optimal White-Box Adversarial Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating LIS Length. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 64:1-64:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gal_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64,
  author =	{Gal, Anna and Kol, Gillat and Saxena, Raghuvansh R. and Yu, Huacheng},
  title =	{{Optimal White-Box Adversarial Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating LIS Length}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{64:1--64:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253519},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64},
  annote =	{Keywords: White-bos streaming, Longest increasing subsequence}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.44
Brief Announcement: Incrementally Verifiable Distributed Computation

Authors: Eden Aldema Tshuva and Rotem Oshman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Incrementally verifiable computation (IVC) is a cryptographic scheme that allows a prover to certify the correctness of a long or ongoing computation in an incremental manner, by repeatedly updating a proof certifying the computation so far. Updating the proof does not require access to the entire trace of the computation, which makes the IVC prover memory efficient. In this work we construct incrementally verifiable distributed computation, which allows a distributed algorithm to efficiently certify its own execution using low memory and communication overhead. Our primary motivation is massively-parallel computation (MPC), where memory efficiency is make-or-break: the machines participating in an MPC algorithm usually cannot store the entire trace of their computation. Thus, certifying MPC algorithms essentially requires distributed IVC. At the heart of this work is a new abstraction, updatable batch arguments for {NP} (UpBARGs), which we define and construct. Standard BARGs allow one to prove a batch of k {NP}-statements using a proof whose length barely grows with k; however, the statements and their witnesses must all be known in advance. In contrast, UpBARGs support adding statements and witnesses on the fly, making them a flexible tool for constructing IVC across different computational models. We use UpBARGs to construct IVC for streaming algorithms, for MPC algorithms, and for PRAM algorithms in the exclusive-read exclusive-write (EREW) model.
Cite as

Eden Aldema Tshuva and Rotem Oshman. Brief Announcement: Incrementally Verifiable Distributed Computation. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 44:1-44:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aldematshuva_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.44,
  author =	{Aldema Tshuva, Eden and Oshman, Rotem},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Incrementally Verifiable Distributed Computation}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{44:1--44:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.44},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248829},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.44},
  annote =	{Keywords: Incrementally verifiable computation, massively parallel computation, streaming, parallel RAM, batch arguments, SNARG}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60
Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets

Authors: Roni Con, Zeyu Guo, Ray Li, and Zihan Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we prove that with high probability, random Reed-Solomon codes approach the half-Singleton bound - the optimal rate versus error tradeoff for linear insdel codes - with linear-sized alphabets. More precisely, we prove that, for any ε > 0 and positive integers n and k, with high probability, random Reed-Solomon codes of length n and dimension k can correct (1-ε)n-2k+1 adversarial insdel errors over alphabets of size n+2^{poly(1/ε)}k. This significantly improves upon the alphabet size demonstrated in the work of Con, Shpilka, and Tamo (IEEE TIT, 2023), who showed the existence of Reed-Solomon codes with exponential alphabet size Õ(binom(n,2k-1)²) precisely achieving the half-Singleton bound. Our methods are inspired by recent works on list-decoding Reed-Solomon codes. Brakensiek-Gopi-Makam (STOC 2023) showed that random Reed-Solomon codes are list-decodable up to capacity with exponential-sized alphabets, and Guo-Zhang (FOCS 2023) and Alrabiah-Guruswami-Li (STOC 2024) improved the alphabet-size to linear. We achieve a similar alphabet-size reduction by similarly establishing strong bounds on the probability that certain random rectangular matrices are full rank. To accomplish this in our insdel context, our proof combines the random matrix techniques from list-decoding with structural properties of Longest Common Subsequences.
Cite as

Roni Con, Zeyu Guo, Ray Li, and Zihan Zhang. Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 60:1-60:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{con_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60,
  author =	{Con, Roni and Guo, Zeyu and Li, Ray and Zhang, Zihan},
  title =	{{Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{60:1--60:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234372},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60},
  annote =	{Keywords: coding theory, error-correcting codes, Reed-Solomon codes, insdel, insertion-deletion errors, half-Singleton bound}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.56
Boosting SNARKs and Rate-1 Barrier in Arguments of Knowledge

Authors: Jiaqi Cheng and Rishab Goyal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We design a generic compiler to boost any non-trivial succinct non-interactive argument of knowledge (SNARK) to full succinctness. Our results come in two flavors: 1) For any constant ε > 0, any SNARK with proof size |π| < |ω|/(λ^ε) + poly(λ, |x|) can be upgraded to a fully succinct SNARK, where all system parameters (such as proof/CRS sizes and setup/verifier run-times) grow as fixed polynomials in λ, independent of witness size. 2) Under an additional assumption that the underlying SNARK has as an efficient knowledge extractor, we further improve our result to upgrade any non-trivial SNARK. For example, we show how to design fully succinct SNARKs from SNARKs with proofs of length |ω| - Ω(λ), or |ω|/(1+ε) + poly(λ, |x|), any constant ε > 0. Our result reduces the long-standing challenge of designing fully succinct SNARKs to designing arguments of knowledge that beat the trivial construction. It also establishes optimality of rate-1 arguments of knowledge (such as NIZKs [Gentry-Groth-Ishai-Peikert-Sahai-Smith; JoC'15] and BARGs [Devadas-Goyal-Kalai-Vaikuntanathan, Paneth-Pass; FOCS'22]), and suggests any further improvement is tantamount to designing fully succinct SNARKs, thus requires bypassing established black-box barriers [Gentry-Wichs; STOC'11].
Cite as

Jiaqi Cheng and Rishab Goyal. Boosting SNARKs and Rate-1 Barrier in Arguments of Knowledge. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 56:1-56:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cheng_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.56,
  author =	{Cheng, Jiaqi and Goyal, Rishab},
  title =	{{Boosting SNARKs and Rate-1 Barrier in Arguments of Knowledge}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{56:1--56:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.56},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234339},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.56},
  annote =	{Keywords: SNARGs, RAM Delegation}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.41
Linear Insertion Deletion Codes in the High-Noise and High-Rate Regimes

Authors: Kuan Cheng, Zhengzhong Jin, Xin Li, Zhide Wei, and Yu Zheng

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 261, 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023)

Abstract
This work continues the study of linear error correcting codes against adversarial insertion deletion errors (insdel errors). Previously, the work of Cheng, Guruswami, Haeupler, and Li [Kuan Cheng et al., 2021] showed the existence of asymptotically good linear insdel codes that can correct arbitrarily close to 1 fraction of errors over some constant size alphabet, or achieve rate arbitrarily close to 1/2 even over the binary alphabet. As shown in [Kuan Cheng et al., 2021], these bounds are also the best possible. However, known explicit constructions in [Kuan Cheng et al., 2021], and subsequent improved constructions by Con, Shpilka, and Tamo [Con et al., 2022] all fall short of meeting these bounds. Over any constant size alphabet, they can only achieve rate < 1/8 or correct < 1/4 fraction of errors; over the binary alphabet, they can only achieve rate < 1/1216 or correct < 1/54 fraction of errors. Apparently, previous techniques face inherent barriers to achieve rate better than 1/4 or correct more than 1/2 fraction of errors. In this work we give new constructions of such codes that meet these bounds, namely, asymptotically good linear insdel codes that can correct arbitrarily close to 1 fraction of errors over some constant size alphabet, and binary asymptotically good linear insdel codes that can achieve rate arbitrarily close to 1/2. All our constructions are efficiently encodable and decodable. Our constructions are based on a novel approach of code concatenation, which embeds the index information implicitly into codewords. This significantly differs from previous techniques and may be of independent interest. Finally, we also prove the existence of linear concatenated insdel codes with parameters that match random linear codes, and propose a conjecture about linear insdel codes.
Cite as

Kuan Cheng, Zhengzhong Jin, Xin Li, Zhide Wei, and Yu Zheng. Linear Insertion Deletion Codes in the High-Noise and High-Rate Regimes. In 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 261, pp. 41:1-41:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cheng_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.41,
  author =	{Cheng, Kuan and Jin, Zhengzhong and Li, Xin and Wei, Zhide and Zheng, Yu},
  title =	{{Linear Insertion Deletion Codes in the High-Noise and High-Rate Regimes}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023)},
  pages =	{41:1--41:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-278-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{261},
  editor =	{Etessami, Kousha and Feige, Uriel and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.41},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-180931},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.41},
  annote =	{Keywords: Error correcting code, Edit distance, Pseudorandomness, Derandomization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.4
Pre-Constrained Encryption

Authors: Prabhanjan Ananth, Abhishek Jain, Zhengzhong Jin, and Giulio Malavolta

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 215, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)

Abstract
In all existing encryption systems, the owner of the master secret key has the ability to decrypt all ciphertexts. In this work, we propose a new notion of pre-constrained encryption (PCE) where the owner of the master secret key does not have "full" decryption power. Instead, its decryption power is constrained in a pre-specified manner during the system setup. We present formal definitions and constructions of PCE, and discuss societal applications and implications to some well-studied cryptographic primitives.
Cite as

Prabhanjan Ananth, Abhishek Jain, Zhengzhong Jin, and Giulio Malavolta. Pre-Constrained Encryption. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 4:1-4:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ananth_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.4,
  author =	{Ananth, Prabhanjan and Jain, Abhishek and Jin, Zhengzhong and Malavolta, Giulio},
  title =	{{Pre-Constrained Encryption}},
  booktitle =	{13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-217-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{215},
  editor =	{Braverman, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-156001},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Advanced encryption systems}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.54
Streaming and Small Space Approximation Algorithms for Edit Distance and Longest Common Subsequence

Authors: Kuan Cheng, Alireza Farhadi, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Zhengzhong Jin, Xin Li, Aviad Rubinstein, Saeed Seddighin, and Yu Zheng

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 198, 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)

Abstract
The edit distance (ED) and longest common subsequence (LCS) are two fundamental problems which quantify how similar two strings are to one another. In this paper, we first consider these problems in the asymmetric streaming model introduced by Andoni, Krauthgamer and Onak [Andoni et al., 2010] (FOCS'10) and Saks and Seshadhri [Saks and Seshadhri, 2013] (SODA'13). In this model we have random access to one string and streaming access the other one. Our main contribution is a constant factor approximation algorithm for ED with memory Õ(n^δ) for any constant δ > 0. In addition to this, we present an upper bound of Õ _ε(√n) on the memory needed to approximate ED or LCS within a factor 1±ε. All our algorithms are deterministic and run in polynomial time in a single pass. We further study small-space approximation algorithms for ED, LCS, and longest increasing sequence (LIS) in the non-streaming setting. Here, we design algorithms that achieve 1 ± ε approximation for all three problems, where ε > 0 can be any constant and even slightly sub-constant. Our algorithms only use poly-logarithmic space while maintaining a polynomial running time. This significantly improves previous results in terms of space complexity, where all known results need to use space at least Ω(√n). Our algorithms make novel use of triangle inequality and carefully designed recursions to save space, which can be of independent interest.
Cite as

Kuan Cheng, Alireza Farhadi, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Zhengzhong Jin, Xin Li, Aviad Rubinstein, Saeed Seddighin, and Yu Zheng. Streaming and Small Space Approximation Algorithms for Edit Distance and Longest Common Subsequence. In 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 198, pp. 54:1-54:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cheng_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.54,
  author =	{Cheng, Kuan and Farhadi, Alireza and Hajiaghayi, MohammadTaghi and Jin, Zhengzhong and Li, Xin and Rubinstein, Aviad and Seddighin, Saeed and Zheng, Yu},
  title =	{{Streaming and Small Space Approximation Algorithms for Edit Distance and Longest Common Subsequence}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)},
  pages =	{54:1--54:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-195-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{198},
  editor =	{Bansal, Nikhil and Merelli, Emanuela and Worrell, James},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.54},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-141236},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.54},
  annote =	{Keywords: Edit Distance, Longest Common Subsequence, Longest Increasing Subsequence, Space Efficient Algorithm, Approximation Algorithm}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.37
Block Edit Errors with Transpositions: Deterministic Document Exchange Protocols and Almost Optimal Binary Codes

Authors: Kuan Cheng, Zhengzhong Jin, Xin Li, and Ke Wu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 132, 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)

Abstract
Document exchange and error correcting codes are two fundamental problems regarding communications. In the first problem, Alice and Bob each holds a string, and the goal is for Alice to send a short sketch to Bob, so that Bob can recover Alice’s string. In the second problem, Alice sends a message with some redundant information to Bob through a channel that can add adversarial errors, and the goal is for Bob to correctly recover the message despite the errors. In both problems, an upper bound is placed on the number of errors between the two strings or that the channel can add, and a major goal is to minimize the size of the sketch or the redundant information. In this paper we focus on deterministic document exchange protocols and binary error correcting codes. Both problems have been studied extensively. In the case of Hamming errors (i.e., bit substitutions) and bit erasures, we have explicit constructions with asymptotically optimal parameters. However, other error types are still rather poorly understood. In a recent work [Kuan Cheng et al., 2018], the authors constructed explicit deterministic document exchange protocols and binary error correcting codes for edit errors with almost optimal parameters. Unfortunately, the constructions in [Kuan Cheng et al., 2018] do not work for other common errors such as block transpositions. In this paper, we generalize the constructions in [Kuan Cheng et al., 2018] to handle a much larger class of errors. These include bursts of insertions and deletions, as well as block transpositions. Specifically, we consider document exchange and error correcting codes where the total number of block insertions, block deletions, and block transpositions is at most k <= alpha n/log n for some constant 0<alpha<1. In addition, the total number of bits inserted and deleted by the first two kinds of operations is at most t <= beta n for some constant 0<beta<1, where n is the length of Alice’s string or message. We construct explicit, deterministic document exchange protocols with sketch size O((k log n +t) log^2 n/{k log n + t}) and explicit binary error correcting code with O(k log n log log log n+t) redundant bits. As a comparison, the information-theoretic optimum for both problems is Theta(k log n+t). As far as we know, previously there are no known explicit deterministic document exchange protocols in this case, and the best known binary code needs Omega(n) redundant bits even to correct just one block transposition [L. J. Schulman and D. Zuckerman, 1999].
Cite as

Kuan Cheng, Zhengzhong Jin, Xin Li, and Ke Wu. Block Edit Errors with Transpositions: Deterministic Document Exchange Protocols and Almost Optimal Binary Codes. In 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 132, pp. 37:1-37:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cheng_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.37,
  author =	{Cheng, Kuan and Jin, Zhengzhong and Li, Xin and Wu, Ke},
  title =	{{Block Edit Errors with Transpositions: Deterministic Document Exchange Protocols and Almost Optimal Binary Codes}},
  booktitle =	{46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-109-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{132},
  editor =	{Baier, Christel and Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Flocchini, Paola and Leonardi, Stefano},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-106137},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: Deterministic document exchange, error correcting code, block edit error}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 10 Document/PDF
  • 6 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 3 2025
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2021
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 4 Jin, Zhengzhong
  • 3 Cheng, Kuan
  • 3 Li, Xin
  • 2 Aldema Tshuva, Eden
  • 2 Oshman, Rotem
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 10 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Coding theory
  • 2 Theory of computation → Cryptographic protocols
  • 2 Theory of computation → Streaming, sublinear and near linear time algorithms
  • 1 Security and privacy → Cryptography
  • 1 Security and privacy → Public key encryption
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Edit distance
  • 2 SNARG
  • 2 batch arguments
  • 2 massively parallel computation
  • 2 parallel RAM
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact