10 Search Results for "Rand, Robert"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.5
Arranging Pairwise Disjoint Shapes to Partition Point Sets

Authors: Robert D. Barish and Tetsuo Shibuya

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 370, 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)

Abstract
We consider the fine-grained complexity of covering a set of n points 𝒫 in the Euclidean plane using a fixed set of geometric objects corresponding to rigid-body translations and, where permitted, rotations of a specified shape Υ. Under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), and both with and without a pairwise disjointness constraint, we establish that no 2^{o(√n)}-time algorithm can exist for this problem in the following cases: (case 1) translatable unit disks; (case 2) translatable fixed-area axis-aligned squares; or (case 3) translatable and rotatable fixed-area equilateral triangles. Furthermore, by way of establishing the #P-completeness under parsimonious reductions of positive 1-in-3-SAT with a cubic planar 3-connected clause-variable incidence graph - pertinent to hardness reductions for counting tilings {(Moore & Robson; Discrete Comput. Geom. 26(4); 2001), (Pak & Yang; J. Comb. Theory. Ser. A 120(7); 2013)} - we establish in each case that there exists a quadratic time reduction from #SAT to counting the possible coverage-induced partitions of 𝒫. Finally, we consider constraints on the density of the points in 𝒫 that make our coverage problems tractable. In particular, letting Υ be any (not necessarily connected) subregion of a radius 1/2 disk characterized by a semi-algebraic function, and letting 𝒫 be a set of n points, we consider the density requirements that: (constraint 1) every 3 points have a minimum bounding disk of radius greater than 1; or (constraint 2) any 5 points have a minimum bounding disk of radius at least 2. Here, when Υ is part of the input, under both (constraint 1) and (constraint 2), and with and without a pairwise disjointness requirement, we show that finding a minimum cardinality set of translatable and/or rotatable instances of Υ covering all points in 𝒫 is fixed-parameter tractable in the size of the semi-algebraic description of Υ.
Cite as

Robert D. Barish and Tetsuo Shibuya. Arranging Pairwise Disjoint Shapes to Partition Point Sets. In 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 370, pp. 5:1-5:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{barish_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.5,
  author =	{Barish, Robert D. and Shibuya, Tetsuo},
  title =	{{Arranging Pairwise Disjoint Shapes to Partition Point Sets}},
  booktitle =	{20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-421-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{370},
  editor =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260413},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: geometric covering, geometric packing, clustering, ply, bounded ply, planar geometry, frequency assignment problem, Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), Counting Exponential Time Hypothesis (#ETH)}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1
Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122)

Authors: Bran Knowles, Vicki L. Hanson, Christoph Becker, Mike Berners-Lee, Andrew A. Chien, Benoit Combemale, Vlad Coroamă, Koen De Bosschere, Yi Ding, Adrian Friday, Boris Gamazaychikov, Lynda Hardman, Simon Hinterholzer, Mattias Höjer, Lynn Kaack, Lenneke Kuijer, Anne-Laure Ligozat, Jan Tobias Muehlberg, Yunmook Nah, Thomas Olsson, Anne-Cécile Orgerie, Daniel Pargman, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Romanoff, Emma Strubell, Colin Venters, and Junhua Zhao

Published in: Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 11, Issue 1 (2025)

Abstract
This Manifesto was produced from the Perspectives Workshop 25122 entitled "Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility?" held March 16-19, 2025 at Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany. The Workshop provided a forum for world-leading computer scientists and expert consultants on environmental policy and sustainable transition to engage in a critical and urgent conversation about computing’s responsibilities in addressing climate change - or more aptly, climate crisis. The resulting Manifesto outlines commitments and directions for future action which, if adopted as a basis for more responsible computing practices, will help ensure that these technologies do not threaten the long-term habitability of the planet. We preface our Manifesto with a recognition that humanity is on a path that is not in agreement with international global warming targets and explore how computing technologies are currently hastening the overshoot of these boundaries. We critically assess the vaunted potential for harnessing computing technologies for the mitigation of global warming, agreeing that, under current circumstances, computing is contributing to negative environmental impacts in other sectors. Computing primarily improves efficiency and reduces costs which leads to more consumption and more negative environmental impact. Relying solely on efficiency gains in computing has thus far proven to be insufficient to curb global greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, computing’s purpose within a strategy for tackling climate change must be reimagined. Our recommendations cover changes that need to be urgently made to the design priorities of computing technologies, but also speak to the more systemic shift in mindset, with sustainability and human rights providing a necessary moral foundation for developing the kinds of computing technologies most needed by society. We also stress the importance of digital policy that accounts for both the direct material impacts of computing and the detrimental indirect impacts arising from computing-enabled efficiencies, and the role of computing professionals in informing policy making.
Cite as

Bran Knowles, Vicki L. Hanson, Christoph Becker, Mike Berners-Lee, Andrew A. Chien, Benoit Combemale, Vlad Coroamă, Koen De Bosschere, Yi Ding, Adrian Friday, Boris Gamazaychikov, Lynda Hardman, Simon Hinterholzer, Mattias Höjer, Lynn Kaack, Lenneke Kuijer, Anne-Laure Ligozat, Jan Tobias Muehlberg, Yunmook Nah, Thomas Olsson, Anne-Cécile Orgerie, Daniel Pargman, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Romanoff, Emma Strubell, Colin Venters, and Junhua Zhao. Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122). In Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 1-18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{knowles_et_al:DagMan.11.1.1,
  author =	{Knowles, Bran and Hanson, Vicki L. and Becker, Christoph and Berners-Lee, Mike and Chien, Andrew A. and Combemale, Benoit and Coroam\u{a}, Vlad and De Bosschere, Koen and Ding, Yi and Friday, Adrian and Gamazaychikov, Boris and Hardman, Lynda and Hinterholzer, Simon and H\"{o}jer, Mattias and Kaack, Lynn and Kuijer, Lenneke and Ligozat, Anne-Laure and Muehlberg, Jan Tobias and Nah, Yunmook and Olsson, Thomas and Orgerie, Anne-C\'{e}cile and Pargman, Daniel and Penzenstadler, Birgit and Romanoff, Tom and Strubell, Emma and Venters, Colin and Zhao, Junhua},
  title =	{{Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122)}},
  pages =	{1--18},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Manifestos},
  ISSN =	{2193-2433},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{11},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Knowles, Bran and Hanson, Vicki L. and Becker, Christoph and Berners-Lee, Mike and Chien, Andrew A. and Combemale, Benoit and Coroam\u{a}, Vlad and De Bosschere, Koen and Ding, Yi and Friday, Adrian and Gamazaychikov, Boris and Hardman, Lynda and Hinterholzer, Simon and H\"{o}jer, Mattias and Kaack, Lynn and Kuijer, Lenneke and Ligozat, Anne-Laure and Muehlberg, Jan Tobias and Nah, Yunmook and Olsson, Thomas and Orgerie, Anne-C\'{e}cile and Pargman, Daniel and Penzenstadler, Birgit and Romanoff, Tom and Strubell, Emma and Venters, Colin and Zhao, Junhua},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250724},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: sustainability, climate change, efficiency, supply chain management, climate modelling}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.85
Cutoff Theorems for the Equivalence of Parameterized Quantum Circuits

Authors: Neil J. Ross and Scott Wesley

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 345, 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)

Abstract
Many promising quantum algorithms in economics, medical science, and material science rely on circuits that are parameterized by a large number of angles. To ensure that these algorithms are efficient, these parameterized circuits must be heavily optimized. However, most quantum circuit optimizers are not verified, so this procedure is known to be error-prone. For this reason, there is growing interest in the design of equivalence checking algorithms for parameterized quantum circuits. In this paper, we define a generalized class of parameterized circuits with arbitrary rotations and show that this problem is decidable for cyclotomic gate sets. We propose a cutoff-based procedure which reduces the problem of verifying the equivalence of parameterized quantum circuits to the problem of verifying the equivalence of finitely many parameter-free quantum circuits. Because the number of parameter-free circuits grows exponentially with the number of parameters, we also propose a probabilistic variant of the algorithm for cases when the number of parameters is intractably large. We show that our techniques extend to equivalence modulo global phase, and describe an efficient angle sampling procedure for cyclotomic gate sets.
Cite as

Neil J. Ross and Scott Wesley. Cutoff Theorems for the Equivalence of Parameterized Quantum Circuits. In 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 345, pp. 85:1-85:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ross_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.85,
  author =	{Ross, Neil J. and Wesley, Scott},
  title =	{{Cutoff Theorems for the Equivalence of Parameterized Quantum Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)},
  pages =	{85:1--85:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-388-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{345},
  editor =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Mazowiecki, Filip and Skrzypczak, Micha{\l}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.85},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-241921},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.85},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum Circuits, Parameterized Equivalence Checking}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.10
Algorithm Engineering of SSSP with Negative Edge Weights

Authors: Alejandro Cassis, Andreas Karrenbauer, André Nusser, and Paolo Luigi Rinaldi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 338, 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)

Abstract
Computing shortest paths is one of the most fundamental algorithmic graph problems. It is known since decades that this problem can be solved in near-linear time if all weights are nonnegative. A recent break-through by [Aaron Bernstein et al., 2022] presented a randomized near-linear time algorithm for this problem. A subsequent improvement in [Karl Bringmann et al., 2023] significantly reduced the number of logarithmic factors and thereby also simplified the algorithm. It is surprising and exciting that both of these algorithms are combinatorial and do not contain any fundamental obstacles for being practical. We launch the, to the best of our knowledge, first extensive investigation towards a practical implementation of [Karl Bringmann et al., 2023]. To this end, we give an accessible overview of the algorithm and discuss what adaptions are necessary to obtain a fast algorithm in practice. We manifest these adaptions in an efficient implementation. We test our implementation on a benchmark data set that is adapted to be more difficult for our implementation in order to allow for a fair comparison. As in [Karl Bringmann et al., 2023] as well as in our implementation there are multiple parameters to tune, we empirically evaluate their effect and thereby determine the best choices. Our implementation is then extensively compared to one of the state-of-the-art algorithms for this problem [Andrew V. Goldberg and Tomasz Radzik, 1993]. On the hardest instance type, we are faster by up to almost two orders of magnitude.
Cite as

Alejandro Cassis, Andreas Karrenbauer, André Nusser, and Paolo Luigi Rinaldi. Algorithm Engineering of SSSP with Negative Edge Weights. In 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 338, pp. 10:1-10:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cassis_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2025.10,
  author =	{Cassis, Alejandro and Karrenbauer, Andreas and Nusser, Andr\'{e} and Rinaldi, Paolo Luigi},
  title =	{{Algorithm Engineering of SSSP with Negative Edge Weights}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-375-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{338},
  editor =	{Mutzel, Petra and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232486},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Single Source Shortest Paths, Negative Weights, Near-Linear Time}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27
Sparsity-Driven Aggregation of Mixed Integer Programs

Authors: Liding Xu, Gioni Mexi, and Ksenia Bestuzheva

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 338, 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)

Abstract
Cutting planes are crucial for the performance of branch-and-cut algorithms for solving mixed-integer programming (MIP) problems, and linear row aggregation has been successfully applied to better leverage the potential of several major families of MIP cutting planes. This paper formulates the problem of finding good quality aggregations as an 𝓁₀-norm minimization problem and employs a combination of the lasso method and iterative reweighting to efficiently find sparse solutions corresponding to good aggregations. A comparative analysis of the proposed algorithm and the state-of-the-art greedy heuristic approach is presented, showing that the greedy heuristic implements a stepwise selection algorithm for the 𝓁₀-norm minimization problem. Further, we present an example where our approach succeeds, whereas the standard heuristic fails to find an aggregation with desired properties. The algorithm is implemented within the constraint integer programming solver SCIP, and computational experiments on the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark show that although the algorithm leads to slowdowns on relatively "easier" instances, our aggregation approach decreases the mean running time on a subset of challenging instances and leads to smaller branch-and-bound trees.
Cite as

Liding Xu, Gioni Mexi, and Ksenia Bestuzheva. Sparsity-Driven Aggregation of Mixed Integer Programs. In 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 338, pp. 27:1-27:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{xu_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27,
  author =	{Xu, Liding and Mexi, Gioni and Bestuzheva, Ksenia},
  title =	{{Sparsity-Driven Aggregation of Mixed Integer Programs}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-375-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{338},
  editor =	{Mutzel, Petra and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232652},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: mixed integer linear programming, cutting plane, valid inequality, separation, aggregation, projection, sparse optimization}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.71
Faster All-Pairs Optimal Electric Car Routing

Authors: Dani Dorfman, Haim Kaplan, Robert E. Tarjan, Mikkel Thorup, and Uri Zwick

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We present a randomized Õ(n^{3.5})-time algorithm for computing optimal energetic paths for an electric car between all pairs of vertices in an n-vertex directed graph with positive and negative costs, or gains, which are defined to be the negatives of the costs. The optimal energetic paths are finite and well-defined even if the graph contains negative-cost, or equivalently, positive-gain, cycles. This makes the problem much more challenging than standard shortest paths problems. More specifically, for every two vertices s and t in the graph, the algorithm computes α_B(s,t), the maximum amount of charge the car can reach t with, if it starts at s with full battery, i.e., with charge B, where B is the capacity of the battery. The algorithm also outputs a concise description of the optimal energetic paths that achieve these values. In the presence of positive-gain cycles, optimal paths are not necessarily simple. For dense graphs, our new Õ(n^{3.5}) time algorithm improves on a previous Õ(mn²)-time algorithm of Dorfman et al. [ESA 2023] for the problem. The gain of an arc is the amount of charge added to the battery of the car when traversing the arc. The charge in the battery can never exceed the capacity B of the battery and can never be negative. An arc of positive gain may correspond, for example, to a downhill road segment, while an arc with a negative gain may correspond to an uphill segment. A positive-gain cycle, if one exists, can be used in certain cases to charge the battery to its capacity. This makes the problem more interesting and more challenging. As mentioned, optimal energetic paths are well-defined even in the presence of positive-gain cycles. Positive-gain cycles may arise when certain road segments have magnetic charging strips, or when the electric car has solar panels. Combined with a result of Dorfman et al. [SOSA 2024], this also provides a randomized Õ(n^{3.5})-time algorithm for computing minimum-cost paths between all pairs of vertices in an n-vertex graph when the battery can be externally recharged, at varying costs, at intermediate vertices.
Cite as

Dani Dorfman, Haim Kaplan, Robert E. Tarjan, Mikkel Thorup, and Uri Zwick. Faster All-Pairs Optimal Electric Car Routing. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 71:1-71:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dorfman_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.71,
  author =	{Dorfman, Dani and Kaplan, Haim and Tarjan, Robert E. and Thorup, Mikkel and Zwick, Uri},
  title =	{{Faster All-Pairs Optimal Electric Car Routing}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{71:1--71:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.71},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234486},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.71},
  annote =	{Keywords: EV routing, Shortest Paths, Shortcuts, Sampling}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.10
Algorithmic Collusion Without Threats

Authors: Eshwar Ram Arunachaleswaran, Natalie Collina, Sampath Kannan, Aaron Roth, and Juba Ziani

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
There has been substantial recent concern that automated pricing algorithms might learn to "collude." Supra-competitive prices can emerge as a Nash equilibrium of repeated pricing games, in which sellers play strategies which threaten to punish their competitors if they ever "defect" from a set of supra-competitive prices, and these strategies can be automatically learned. But threats are anti-competitive on their face. In fact, a standard economic intuition is that supra-competitive prices emerge from either the use of threats, or a failure of one party to correctly optimize their payoff. Is this intuition correct? Would explicitly preventing threats in algorithmic decision-making prevent supra-competitive prices when sellers are optimizing for their own revenue? No. We show that supra-competitive prices can robustly emerge even when both players are using algorithms which do not explicitly encode threats, and which optimize for their own revenue. Since deploying an algorithm is a form of commitment, we study sequential Bertrand pricing games (and a continuous variant) in which a first mover deploys an algorithm and then a second mover optimizes within the resulting environment. We show that if the first mover deploys any algorithm with a no-regret guarantee, and then the second mover even approximately optimizes within this now static environment, monopoly-like prices arise. The result holds for any no-regret learning algorithm deployed by the first mover and for any pricing policy of the second mover that obtains them profit at least as high as a random pricing would - and hence the result applies even when the second mover is optimizing only within a space of non-responsive pricing distributions which are incapable of encoding threats. In fact, there exists a set of strategies, neither of which explicitly encode threats that form a Nash equilibrium of the simultaneous pricing game in algorithm space, and lead to near monopoly prices. This suggests that the definition of "algorithmic collusion" may need to be expanded, to include strategies without explicitly encoded threats.
Cite as

Eshwar Ram Arunachaleswaran, Natalie Collina, Sampath Kannan, Aaron Roth, and Juba Ziani. Algorithmic Collusion Without Threats. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 10:1-10:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arunachaleswaran_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.10,
  author =	{Arunachaleswaran, Eshwar Ram and Collina, Natalie and Kannan, Sampath and Roth, Aaron and Ziani, Juba},
  title =	{{Algorithmic Collusion Without Threats}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226386},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algorithmic Game Theory, Algorithmic Collusion, No-Regret Dynamics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47
A Rewriting Theory for Quantum λ-Calculus

Authors: Claudia Faggian, Gaetan Lopez, and Benoît Valiron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
Quantum lambda calculus has been studied mainly as an idealized programming language - the evaluation essentially corresponds to a deterministic abstract machine. Very little work has been done to develop a rewriting theory for quantum lambda calculus. Recent advances in the theory of probabilistic rewriting give us a way to tackle this task with tools unavailable a decade ago. Our primary focus are standardization and normalization results.
Cite as

Claudia Faggian, Gaetan Lopez, and Benoît Valiron. A Rewriting Theory for Quantum λ-Calculus. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 47:1-47:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{faggian_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47,
  author =	{Faggian, Claudia and Lopez, Gaetan and Valiron, Beno\^{i}t},
  title =	{{A Rewriting Theory for Quantum \lambda-Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{47:1--47:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228046},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum lambda-calculus, probabilistic rewriting, operational semantics, asymptotic normalization, principles of quantum programming languages}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.21
Proving Quantum Programs Correct

Authors: Kesha Hietala, Robert Rand, Shih-Han Hung, Liyi Li, and Michael Hicks

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 193, 12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021)

Abstract
As quantum computing progresses steadily from theory into practice, programmers will face a common problem: How can they be sure that their code does what they intend it to do? This paper presents encouraging results in the application of mechanized proof to the domain of quantum programming in the context of the SQIR development. It verifies the correctness of a range of a quantum algorithms including Grover’s algorithm and quantum phase estimation, a key component of Shor’s algorithm. In doing so, it aims to highlight both the successes and challenges of formal verification in the quantum context and motivate the theorem proving community to target quantum computing as an application domain.
Cite as

Kesha Hietala, Robert Rand, Shih-Han Hung, Liyi Li, and Michael Hicks. Proving Quantum Programs Correct. In 12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 193, pp. 21:1-21:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hietala_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2021.21,
  author =	{Hietala, Kesha and Rand, Robert and Hung, Shih-Han and Li, Liyi and Hicks, Michael},
  title =	{{Proving Quantum Programs Correct}},
  booktitle =	{12th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2021)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-188-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{193},
  editor =	{Cohen, Liron and Kaliszyk, Cezary},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-139160},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2021.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal Verification, Quantum Computing, Proof Engineering}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.12
Formal Verification vs. Quantum Uncertainty

Authors: Robert Rand, Kesha Hietala, and Michael Hicks

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 136, 3rd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2019)

Abstract
Quantum programming is hard: Quantum programs are necessarily probabilistic and impossible to examine without disrupting the execution of a program. In response to this challenge, we and a number of other researchers have written tools to verify quantum programs against their intended semantics. This is not enough. Verifying an idealized semantics against a real world quantum program doesn't allow you to confidently predict the program’s output. In order to have verification that works, you need both an error semantics related to the hardware at hand (this is necessarily low level) and certified compilation to the that same hardware. Once we have these two things, we can talk about an approach to quantum programming where we start by writing and verifying programs at a high level, attempt to verify properties of the compiled code, and repeat as necessary.
Cite as

Robert Rand, Kesha Hietala, and Michael Hicks. Formal Verification vs. Quantum Uncertainty. In 3rd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 136, pp. 12:1-12:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rand_et_al:LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.12,
  author =	{Rand, Robert and Hietala, Kesha and Hicks, Michael},
  title =	{{Formal Verification vs. Quantum Uncertainty}},
  booktitle =	{3rd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2019)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:11},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-113-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{136},
  editor =	{Lerner, Benjamin S. and Bod{\'\i}k, Rastislav and Krishnamurthi, Shriram},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-105558},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal Verification, Quantum Computing, Programming Languages, Quantum Error Correction, Certified Compilation, NISQ}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 10 Document/PDF
  • 7 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 7 2025
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2019

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Hicks, Michael
  • 2 Hietala, Kesha
  • 2 Rand, Robert
  • 1 Arunachaleswaran, Eshwar Ram
  • 1 Barish, Robert D.
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 9 LIPIcs
  • 1 DagMan

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Hardware → Quantum computation
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Formal software verification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Shortest paths
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
  • 1 Hardware → Circuit optimization
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Formal Verification
  • 2 Quantum Computing
  • 1 Algorithmic Collusion
  • 1 Algorithmic Game Theory
  • 1 Certified Compilation
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact