62 Search Results for "Murano, Aniello"


Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 288

32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)

CSL 2024, February 19-23, 2024, Naples, Italy

Editors: Aniello Murano and Alexandra Silva

Document
Termination of Generalized Term Rewriting Systems

Authors: Salvador Lucas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 299, 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)


Abstract
We investigate termination of Generalized Term Rewriting Systems (GTRS), which extend Conditional Term Rewriting Systems by considering replacement restrictions on selected arguments of function symbols, as in Context-Sensitive Rewriting, and conditional rewriting rules whose conditional part may include not only a mix of the usual (reachability, joinability,...) conditions, but also atoms defined by a set of definite Horn clauses. GTRS can be used to prove confluence and termination of Generalized Rewrite Theories and Maude programs. We have characterized confluence of terminating GTRS as the joinability of a finite set of conditional pairs. Since termination of GTRS is underexplored to date, this paper introduces a Dependency Pair Framework which is well-suited to automatically (dis)prove termination of GTRS.

Cite as

Salvador Lucas. Termination of Generalized Term Rewriting Systems. In 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 299, pp. 32:1-32:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lucas:LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.32,
  author =	{Lucas, Salvador},
  title =	{{Termination of Generalized Term Rewriting Systems}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-323-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{299},
  editor =	{Rehof, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203616},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program Analysis, Reduction-Based Systems, Termination}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
The Complexity of Computing in Continuous Time: Space Complexity Is Precision

Authors: Manon Blanc and Olivier Bournez

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 297, 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)


Abstract
Models of computations over the integers are equivalent from a computability and complexity theory point of view by the (effective) Church-Turing thesis. It is not possible to unify discrete-time models over the reals. The situation is unclear but simpler for continuous-time models, as there is a unifying mathematical model, provided by ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Each model corresponds to a particular class of ODEs. For example, the General Purpose Analog Computer model of Claude Shannon, introduced as a mathematical model of analogue machines (Differential Analyzers), is known to correspond to polynomial ODEs. However, the question of a robust complexity theory for such models and its relations to classical (discrete) computation theory is an old problem. There was some recent significant progress: it has been proved that (classical) time complexity corresponds to the length of the involved curves, i.e. to the length of the solutions of the corresponding polynomial ODEs. The question of whether there is a simple and robust way to measure space complexity remains. We argue that space complexity corresponds to precision and conversely. Concretely, we propose and prove an algebraic characterisation of FPSPACE, using continuous ODEs. Recent papers proposed algebraic characterisations of polynomial-time and polynomial-space complexity classes over the reals, but with a discrete-time: those algebras rely on discrete ODE schemes. Here, we use classical (continuous) ODEs, with the classic definition of derivation and hence with the more natural context of continuous-time associated with ODEs. We characterise both the case of polynomial space functions over the integers and the reals. This is done by proving two inclusions. The first is obtained using some original polynomial space method for solving ODEs. For the other, we prove that Turing machines, with a proper representation of real numbers, can be simulated by continuous ODEs and not just discrete ODEs. A major consequence is that the associated space complexity is provably related to the numerical stability of involved schemas and the associated required precision. We obtain that a problem can be solved in polynomial space if and only if it can be simulated by some numerically stable ODE, using a polynomial precision.

Cite as

Manon Blanc and Olivier Bournez. The Complexity of Computing in Continuous Time: Space Complexity Is Precision. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 129:1-129:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{blanc_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.129,
  author =	{Blanc, Manon and Bournez, Olivier},
  title =	{{The Complexity of Computing in Continuous Time: Space Complexity Is Precision}},
  booktitle =	{51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)},
  pages =	{129:1--129:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-322-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{297},
  editor =	{Bringmann, Karl and Grohe, Martin and Puppis, Gabriele and Svensson, Ola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.129},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-202722},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.129},
  annote =	{Keywords: Models of computation, Ordinary differential equations, Real computations, Analog computations, Complexity theory, Implicit complexity, Recursion scheme}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
Function Spaces for Orbit-Finite Sets

Authors: Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Lê Thành Dũng (Tito) Nguyễn, and Rafał Stefański

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 297, 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)


Abstract
Orbit-finite sets are a generalisation of finite sets, and as such support many operations allowed for finite sets, such as pairing, quotienting, or taking subsets. However, they do not support function spaces, i.e. if X and Y are orbit-finite sets, then the space of finitely supported functions from X to Y is not orbit-finite. We propose a solution to this problem inspired by linear logic.

Cite as

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Lê Thành Dũng (Tito) Nguyễn, and Rafał Stefański. Function Spaces for Orbit-Finite Sets. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 130:1-130:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bojanczyk_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.130,
  author =	{Boja\'{n}czyk, Miko{\l}aj and Nguy\~{ê}n, L\^{e} Th\`{a}nh D\~{u}ng (Tito) and Stefa\'{n}ski, Rafa{\l}},
  title =	{{Function Spaces for Orbit-Finite Sets}},
  booktitle =	{51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)},
  pages =	{130:1--130:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-322-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{297},
  editor =	{Bringmann, Karl and Grohe, Martin and Puppis, Gabriele and Svensson, Ola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.130},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-202730},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.130},
  annote =	{Keywords: Orbit-finite sets, automata, linear types, game semantics}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
Homogeneity and Homogenizability: Hard Problems for the Logic SNP

Authors: Jakub Rydval

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 297, 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)


Abstract
The infinite-domain CSP dichotomy conjecture extends the finite-domain CSP dichotomy theorem to reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures. Every countable finitely bounded homogeneous structure is uniquely described by a universal first-order sentence up to isomorphism, and every reduct of such a structure by a sentence of the logic SNP. By Fraïssé’s Theorem, testing the existence of a finitely bounded homogeneous structure for a given universal first-order sentence is equivalent to testing the amalgamation property for the class of its finite models. The present paper motivates a complexity-theoretic view on the classification problem for finitely bounded homogeneous structures. We show that this meta-problem is EXPSPACE-hard or PSPACE-hard, depending on whether the input is specified by a universal sentence or a set of forbidden substructures. By relaxing the input to SNP sentences and the question to the existence of a structure with a finitely bounded homogeneous expansion, we obtain a different meta-problem, closely related to the question of homogenizability. We show that this second meta-problem is already undecidable, even if the input SNP sentence comes from the Datalog fragment and uses at most binary relation symbols. As a byproduct of our proof, we also get the undecidability of some other properties for Datalog programs, e.g., whether they can be rewritten in the logic MMSNP, whether they solve some finite-domain CSP, or whether they define a structure with a homogeneous Ramsey expansion in a finite relational signature.

Cite as

Jakub Rydval. Homogeneity and Homogenizability: Hard Problems for the Logic SNP. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 150:1-150:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rydval:LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.150,
  author =	{Rydval, Jakub},
  title =	{{Homogeneity and Homogenizability: Hard Problems for the Logic SNP}},
  booktitle =	{51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)},
  pages =	{150:1--150:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-322-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{297},
  editor =	{Bringmann, Karl and Grohe, Martin and Puppis, Gabriele and Svensson, Ola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.150},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-202939},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.150},
  annote =	{Keywords: constraint satisfaction problems, finitely bounded, homogeneous, amalgamation property, universal, SNP, homogenizable}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
On Homomorphism Indistinguishability and Hypertree Depth

Authors: Benjamin Scheidt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 297, 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)


Abstract
GC^k is a logic introduced by Scheidt and Schweikardt (2023) to express properties of hypergraphs. It is similar to first-order logic with counting quantifiers (C) adapted to the hypergraph setting. It has distinct sets of variables for vertices and for hyperedges and requires vertex variables to be guarded by hyperedge variables on every quantification. We prove that two hypergraphs G, H satisfy the same sentences in the logic GC^k with guard depth at most k if, and only if, they are homomorphism indistinguishable over the class of hypergraphs of strict hypertree depth at most k. This lifts the analogous result for tree depth ≤ k and sentences of first-order logic with counting quantifiers of quantifier rank at most k due to Grohe (2020) from graphs to hypergraphs. The guard depth of a formula is the quantifier rank with respect to hyperedge variables, and strict hypertree depth is a restriction of hypertree depth as defined by Adler, Gavenčiak and Klimošová (2012). To justify this restriction, we show that for every H, the strict hypertree depth of H is at most 1 larger than its hypertree depth, and we give additional evidence that strict hypertree depth can be viewed as a reasonable generalisation of tree depth for hypergraphs.

Cite as

Benjamin Scheidt. On Homomorphism Indistinguishability and Hypertree Depth. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 152:1-152:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{scheidt:LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.152,
  author =	{Scheidt, Benjamin},
  title =	{{On Homomorphism Indistinguishability and Hypertree Depth}},
  booktitle =	{51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)},
  pages =	{152:1--152:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-322-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{297},
  editor =	{Bringmann, Karl and Grohe, Martin and Puppis, Gabriele and Svensson, Ola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.152},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-202958},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.152},
  annote =	{Keywords: homomorphism indistinguishability, counting logics, guarded logics, hypergraphs, incidence graphs, tree depth, elimination forest, hypertree width}
}
Document
Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282)

Authors: James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Frank Wolter

Published in: Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2024)


Abstract
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning is a central, longstanding, and active area of Artificial Intelligence. Over the years it has evolved significantly; more recently it has been challenged and complemented by research in areas such as machine learning and reasoning under uncertainty. In July 2022,sser a Dagstuhl Perspectives workshop was held on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. The goal of the workshop was to describe the state of the art in the field, including its relation with other areas, its shortcomings and strengths, together with recommendations for future progress. We developed this manifesto based on the presentations, panels, working groups, and discussions that took place at the Dagstuhl Workshop. It is a declaration of our views on Knowledge Representation: its origins, goals, milestones, and current foci; its relation to other disciplines, especially to Artificial Intelligence; and on its challenges, along with key priorities for the next decade.

Cite as

James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Frank Wolter. Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282). In Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 1-61, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{delgrande_et_al:DagMan.10.1.1,
  author =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Wolter, Frank},
  title =	{{Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282)}},
  pages =	{1--61},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Manifestos},
  ISSN =	{2193-2433},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Wolter, Frank},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-201403},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge representation and reasoning, Applications of logics, Declarative representations, Formal logic}
}
Document
Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 288, CSL 2024, Complete Volume

Authors: Aniello Murano and Alexandra Silva

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 288, CSL 2024, Complete Volume

Cite as

32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 1-892, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{murano_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2024,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 288, CSL 2024, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{1--892},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196423},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024},
  annote =	{Keywords: LIPIcs, Volume 288, CSL 2024, Complete Volume}
}
Document
Front Matter
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Authors: Aniello Murano and Alexandra Silva

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Cite as

32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 0:i-0:xiv, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{murano_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.0,
  author =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:xiv},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196436},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}
}
Document
Ackermann Award
The Ackermann Award 2023

Authors: Maribel Fernández, Jean Goubault-Larrecq, and Delia Kesner

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
Report on the 2023 Ackermann Award.

Cite as

Maribel Fernández, Jean Goubault-Larrecq, and Delia Kesner. The Ackermann Award 2023. In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 1:1-1:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fernandez_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.1,
  author =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel and Goubault-Larrecq, Jean and Kesner, Delia},
  title =	{{The Ackermann Award 2023}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196446},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, computational complexity, geometry of interaction, abstract machines, intersection types}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Craig Interpolation for Decidable Fragments of First-Order Logic (Invited Talk)

Authors: Balder ten Cate

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
The Craig Interpolation Property (CIP) is a property of logics. It states that, for all formulas φ and ψ, if φ ⊧ ψ, then there exists an "interpolant" ϑ such that φ ⊧ ϑ and ϑ ⊧ ψ, and such that all non-logical symbols occurring in ϑ occur both in φ and in ψ. Craig [Craig, 1957] proved in 1957 that first-order logic (FO) has this property. Since then, many refinements of Craig’s result have been obtained (e.g., [Otto, 2000; Benedikt et al., 2016]). These have found applications in various areas of computer science and AI, including formal verification, modular hard/software specification and automated deduction [McMillan, 2018; Calvanese et al., 2020; Hoder et al., 2012], and more recently prominently in databases [Toman and Weddell, 2011; Benedikt et al., 2016] and knowledge representation [Lutz and Wolter, 2011; ten Cate et al., 2013; Koopmann and Schmidt, 2015]. In this invited talk, we will survey recent work pertaining to Craig interpolation for various important decidable fragment of first-order logic, including guarded fragments, finite-variable fragments, and ordered fragments. Most of these fragments lack the CIP (the guarded-negation fragment GNFO being a notable exception [Bárány et al., 2013]). We will discuss strategies that have been proposed in recent literature to deal with this lack of CIP, as well as recent results that shed light on where, within the landscape of decidable fragment of first-order logic, one may find logics that enjoy CIP [Jung and Wolter, 2021; ten Cate and Comer, 2023].

Cite as

Balder ten Cate. Craig Interpolation for Decidable Fragments of First-Order Logic (Invited Talk). In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 2:1-2:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{tencate:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.2,
  author =	{ten Cate, Balder},
  title =	{{Craig Interpolation for Decidable Fragments of First-Order Logic}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196488},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: First-Order Logic, Decidable Fragments, Craig Interpolation}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Ignorance (Invited Talk)

Authors: Georg Gottlob

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
This invited talk first delves into the division between the two primary branches of AI research: symbolic AI, which predominantly focuses on knowledge representation and logical reasoning, and sub-symbolic AI, primarily centered on machine learning employing neural networks. We explore both the notable accomplishments and the challenges encountered in each of these approaches. We provide instances where traditional deep learning encounters limitations, and we elucidate significant obstacles in achieving automated symbolic reasoning. We then discuss the recent groundbreaking advancements in generative AI, driven by language models such as ChatGPT. We showcase instances where these models excel and, conversely, where they exhibit shortcomings and produce erroneous information. We identify and illustrate five key reasons for potential failures in language models, which include: [(i)] 1) information loss due to data compression, 2) training bias, 3) the incorporation of incorrect external data, 4) the misordering of results, and 5) the failure to detect and resolve logical inconsistencies contained in a sequence of LLM-generated prompt-answers. Lastly, we touch upon the Chat2Data project, which endeavors to leverage language models for the automated verification and enhancement of relational databases, all while mitigating the pitfalls (i)-(v) mentioned earlier.

Cite as

Georg Gottlob. Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Ignorance (Invited Talk). In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, p. 3:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gottlob:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.3,
  author =	{Gottlob, Georg},
  title =	{{Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Ignorance}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196459},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: AI applications, symbolic AI, sub-symbolic AI, AI usefulness, achievements of symbolic AI, achievements of machine learning, machine learning errors and mistakes, large language models, LLMs, LLM usefulness, LLM mistakes, inaccuracies}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Approximating Fixpoints of Approximated Functions (Invited Talk)

Authors: Barbara König

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
There is a large body of work on fixpoint theorems, guaranteeing the existence of fixpoints for certain functions and providing methods for computing them. This includes for instance Banachs’s fixpoint theorem, the well-known result by Knaster-Tarski that is frequently employed in computer science and Kleene iteration. It is less clear how to compute fixpoints if the function whose (least) fixpoint we are interested in is not known exactly, but can only be obtained by a sequence of subsequently better approximations. This scenario occurs for instance in the context of reinforcement learning, where the probabilities of a Markov decision process (MDP) - for which one wants to learn a strategy - are unknown and can only be sampled. There are several solutions to this problem where the fixpoint computation (for determining the value vector and the optimal strategy) and the exploration of the model are interleaved. However, these methods work only well for discounted MDPs, that is in the contractive setting, but not for general MDPs, that is for non-expansive functions. After describing and motivating the problem, we will in particular concentrate on the non-expansive case. There are many interesting systems who value vectors can be obtained by determining the fixpoints of non-expansive functions. Other than contractive functions, they do not guarantee uniqueness of the fixpoint, making it more difficult to approximate the least fixpoint by methods other than Kleene iteration. And also Kleene iteration fails if the function under consideration is only approximated. We hence describe a dampened Mann iteration scheme for (higher-dimensional) functions on the reals that converges to the least fixpoint from everywhere. This scheme can also be adapted to functions that are approximated, under certain conditions. We will in particular study the case of MDPs and consider a related problem that arises when performing model-checking for quantitative mu-calculi, which involves the computation of nested fixpoints. This is joint work with Paolo Baldan, Sebastian Gurke, Tommaso Padoan and Florian Wittbold.

Cite as

Barbara König. Approximating Fixpoints of Approximated Functions (Invited Talk). In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, p. 4:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{konig:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.4,
  author =	{K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  title =	{{Approximating Fixpoints of Approximated Functions}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196469},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: fixpoints, approximation, Markov decision processes}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Strategy Synthesis for Partially Observable Stochastic Games with Neural Perception Mechanisms (Invited Talk)

Authors: Marta Kwiatkowska

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
Strategic reasoning is essential to ensure stable multi-agent coordination in complex environments, as it enables synthesis of optimal (or near-optimal) agent strategies and equilibria that guarantee expected outcomes, even in adversarial scenarios. Partially-observable stochastic games (POSGs) are a natural model for real-world settings involving multiple agents, uncertainty and partial information, but lack practical algorithms for computing or approximating optimal values and strategies. Recently, progress has been made for one-sided POSGs, a subclass of two-agent, zero-sum POSGs where only one agent has partial information while the other agent is assumed to have full knowledge of the state, with heuristic search value iteration (HSVI) proposed for computing approximately optimal values and strategies in one-sided POSGs [Horák et al., 2023]. This model is well suited to safety-critical applications, when making worst-case assumptions about one agent; examples include the attacker in a security application, modelled, e.g., as a patrolling or pursuit-evasion game. However, many realistic autonomous coordination scenarios involve agents perceiving continuous environments using data-driven observation functions, typically implemented as neural networks (NNs). Examples include autonomous vehicles using NNs to perform object recognition or to estimate pedestrian intention, or NN-enabled vision in an airborne pursuit-evasion scenario. Such perception mechanisms bring new challenges, notably continuous environments, which are inherently tied to NN-enabled perception because of standard training regimes. This means that naive discretisation is difficult, since decision boundaries obtained for data-driven perception are typically irregular and can be misaligned with gridding schemes for discretisation, affecting the precision of the computed strategies. This invited paper will discuss progress with developing a model class and algorithms for one-sided POSGs with neural perception mechanisms [R. Yan et al., 2022; Yan et al., 2023] that work directly with their continuous state space. Building on continuous-state POMDPs with NN perception mechanisms [Yan et al., 2023], where the key idea is that ReLU neural network classifiers induce a finite decomposition of the continuous environment into polyhedra for each classification label, a piecewise constant representation for the value, reward and perception functions is developed that forms the basis for a variant of HSVI, a point-based solution method that computes a lower and upper bound on the value function from a given belief to compute an (approximately) optimal strategy. We extend these ideas from the single-agent (POMDP) setting [Yan et al., 2023] to zero-sum POSGs. In the game setting, this involves solving a normal form game at each stage and iteration, and goes significantly beyond HSVI for finite POSGs [Horák et al., 2023].

Cite as

Marta Kwiatkowska. Strategy Synthesis for Partially Observable Stochastic Games with Neural Perception Mechanisms (Invited Talk). In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 5:1-5:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kwiatkowska:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.5,
  author =	{Kwiatkowska, Marta},
  title =	{{Strategy Synthesis for Partially Observable Stochastic Games with Neural Perception Mechanisms}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196471},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stochastic games, neural networks, formal verification, strategy synthesis}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Logical Algorithmics: From Theory to Practice (Invited Talk)

Authors: Moshe Y. Vardi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)


Abstract
The standard approach to algorithm development is to focus on a specific problem and develop for it a specific algorithm. Codd’s introduction of the relational model in 1970 included two fundamental ideas: (1) Relations provide a universal data representation formalism, and (2) Relational databases can be queried using first-order logic. Realizing these ideas required the development of a meta-algorithm, which takes a declarative query and executes it with respect to a database. In this talk, I will describe this approach, which I call Logical Algorithmics, in detail, and explore its profound ramification.

Cite as

Moshe Y. Vardi. Logical Algorithmics: From Theory to Practice (Invited Talk). In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, p. 6:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vardi:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.6,
  author =	{Vardi, Moshe Y.},
  title =	{{Logical Algorithmics: From Theory to Practice}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196494},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Logic, Algorithms}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 7 Murano, Aniello
  • 2 Blanc, Manon
  • 2 Bournez, Olivier
  • 2 Bozzelli, Laura
  • 2 Lucas, Salvador
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 11 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 8 Theory of computation → Finite Model Theory
  • 8 Theory of computation → Logic
  • 6 Theory of computation → Proof theory
  • 5 Theory of computation → Categorical semantics
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 decidability
  • 3 homomorphism indistinguishability
  • 3 multi-agent systems
  • 2 Completeness
  • 2 Complexity theory
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 61 document
  • 1 volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 57 2024
  • 2 2017
  • 2 2018
  • 1 2010