5 Search Results for "Tabuada, Paulo"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.33
A Zone-Based Algorithm for Timed Parity Games

Authors: Gilles Geeraerts, Frédéric Herbreteau, Jean-François Raskin, and Alexis Reynouard

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
This paper revisits timed games by building upon the semantics introduced in "The Element of Surprise in Timed Games" [Luca de Alfaro et al., 2003]. We introduce some modifications to this semantics for two primary reasons: firstly, we recognize instances where the original semantics appears counterintuitive in the context of controller synthesis; secondly, we present methods to develop efficient zone-based algorithms. Our algorithm successfully addresses timed parity games, and we have implemented it using UPPAAL’s zone library. This prototype effectively demonstrates the feasibility of a zone-based algorithm for parity objectives and a rich semantics for timed interactions between the players.
Cite as

Gilles Geeraerts, Frédéric Herbreteau, Jean-François Raskin, and Alexis Reynouard. A Zone-Based Algorithm for Timed Parity Games. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 33:1-33:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{geeraerts_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.33,
  author =	{Geeraerts, Gilles and Herbreteau, Fr\'{e}d\'{e}ric and Raskin, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois and Reynouard, Alexis},
  title =	{{A Zone-Based Algorithm for Timed Parity Games}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251140},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Timed Parity Games, Realtime Controller Synthesis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19
Time for Timed Monitorability

Authors: Thomas M. Grosen, Sean Kauffman, Kim G. Larsen, and Martin Zimmermann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
Monitoring is an important part of the verification toolbox, in particular in situations where exhaustive verification using, e.g., model-checking is infeasible. The goal of online monitoring is to determine the satisfaction or violation of a specification during runtime, i.e., based on finite execution prefixes. However, not every specification is amenable to monitoring, e.g., properties for which no finite execution can witness satisfaction or violation. Monitorability is the question of whether a given specification is amenable to monitoring, and has been extensively studied in discrete time. Here, we study the monitorability problem for real-time properties expressed as Timed Automata. For specifications given by deterministic Timed Muller Automata, we prove decidability while we show that the problem is undecidable for specifications given by nondeterministic Timed Büchi automata. Furthermore, we refine monitorability to also determine bounds on the number of events as well as the time that must pass before monitoring the property may yield an informative verdict. We prove that for deterministic Timed Muller automata, such bounds can be effectively computed. In contrast we show that for nondeterministic Timed Büchi automata such bounds are not computable.
Cite as

Thomas M. Grosen, Sean Kauffman, Kim G. Larsen, and Martin Zimmermann. Time for Timed Monitorability. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 19:1-19:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grosen_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19,
  author =	{Grosen, Thomas M. and Kauffman, Sean and Larsen, Kim G. and Zimmermann, Martin},
  title =	{{Time for Timed Monitorability}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239690},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Monitorability, Monitoring, Timed Automata, MITL}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES.10.1.3
Limited-Preemption EDF Scheduling for Multi-Phase Secure Tasks

Authors: Benjamin Standaert, Fatima Raadia, Marion Sudvarg, Sanjoy Baruah, Thidapat Chantem, Nathan Fisher, and Christopher Gill

Published in: LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract
Safety-critical embedded systems such as autonomous vehicles typically have only very limited computational capabilities on board that must be carefully managed to provide required enhanced functionalities. As these systems become more complex and inter-connected, some parts may need to be secured to prevent unauthorized access, or isolated to ensure correctness. We propose the multi-phase secure (MPS) task model as a natural extension of the widely used sporadic task model for modeling both the timing and the security (and isolation) requirements for such systems. Under MPS, task phases reflect execution using different security mechanisms which each have associated execution time costs for startup and teardown. We develop corresponding limited-preemption EDF scheduling algorithms and associated pseudo-polynomial schedulability tests for constrained-deadline MPS tasks. In doing so, we provide a correction to a long-standing schedulability condition for EDF under limited-preemption. Evaluation shows that the proposed tests are efficient to compute for bounded utilizations. We empirically demonstrate that the MPS model successfully schedules more task sets compared to non-preemptive approaches.
Cite as

Benjamin Standaert, Fatima Raadia, Marion Sudvarg, Sanjoy Baruah, Thidapat Chantem, Nathan Fisher, and Christopher Gill. Limited-Preemption EDF Scheduling for Multi-Phase Secure Tasks. In LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 3:1-3:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{standaert_et_al:LITES.10.1.3,
  author =	{Standaert, Benjamin and Raadia, Fatima and Sudvarg, Marion and Baruah, Sanjoy and Chantem, Thidapat and Fisher, Nathan and Gill, Christopher},
  title =	{{Limited-Preemption EDF Scheduling for Multi-Phase Secure Tasks}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{3:1--3:27},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES.10.1.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230799},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES.10.1.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: real-time systems, limited-preemption scheduling, trusted execution environments}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19
The Complexity of Learning LTL, CTL and ATL Formulas

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Daniel Neider, and Rajarshi Roy

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
We consider the problem of learning temporal logic formulas from examples of system behavior. Learning temporal properties has crystallized as an effective means to explain complex temporal behaviors. Several efficient algorithms have been designed for learning temporal formulas. However, the theoretical understanding of the complexity of the learning decision problems remains largely unexplored. To address this, we study the complexity of the passive learning problems of three prominent temporal logics, Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), Computation Tree Logic (CTL) and Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL) and several of their fragments. We show that learning formulas with unbounded occurrences of binary operators is NP-complete for all of these logics. On the other hand, when investigating the complexity of learning formulas with bounded occurrences of binary operators, we exhibit discrepancies between the complexity of learning LTL, CTL and ATL formulas (with a varying number of agents).
Cite as

Benjamin Bordais, Daniel Neider, and Rajarshi Roy. The Complexity of Learning LTL, CTL and ATL Formulas. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 19:1-19:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bordais_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19,
  author =	{Bordais, Benjamin and Neider, Daniel and Roy, Rajarshi},
  title =	{{The Complexity of Learning LTL, CTL and ATL Formulas}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228441},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Temporal logic, passive learning, complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.10
Robust Linear Temporal Logic

Authors: Paulo Tabuada and Daniel Neider

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 62, 25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016)

Abstract
Although it is widely accepted that every system should be robust, in the sense that "small" violations of environment assumptions should lead to "small" violations of system guarantees, it is less clear how to make this intuitive notion of robustness mathematically precise. In this paper, we address the problem of how to specify robustness in temporal logic. Our solution consists of a robust version of the Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) fragment that only contains the always and eventually temporal operators.
Cite as

Paulo Tabuada and Daniel Neider. Robust Linear Temporal Logic. In 25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 62, pp. 10:1-10:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{tabuada_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2016.10,
  author =	{Tabuada, Paulo and Neider, Daniel},
  title =	{{Robust Linear Temporal Logic}},
  booktitle =	{25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-022-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{62},
  editor =	{Talbot, Jean-Marc and Regnier, Laurent},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-65508},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Linear Temporal Logic, Robustness}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 5 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2016

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Neider, Daniel
  • 1 Baruah, Sanjoy
  • 1 Bordais, Benjamin
  • 1 Chantem, Thidapat
  • 1 Fisher, Nathan
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs
  • 1 LITES

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Real-time systems
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Formal methods
  • 1 Theory of computation
  • 1 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Modal and temporal logics

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Linear Temporal Logic
  • 1 MITL
  • 1 Monitorability
  • 1 Monitoring
  • 1 Realtime Controller Synthesis
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact