9 Search Results for "Tackmann, Björn"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.65
Characterizing Off-Chain Influence Proof Transaction Fee Mechanisms

Authors: Aadityan Ganesh, Clayton Thomas, and S. Matthew Weinberg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Roughgarden [Roughgarden, 2020] initiates the study of Transaction Fee Mechanisms (TFMs), and posits that the on-chain game of a "good" TFM should be on-chain simple (OnC-S), i.e., incentive compatible for both the users and the miner. Recent work of Ganesh, Thomas an Weinberg [Ganesh et al., 2024] posit that they should additionally be Off-Chain Influence-Proof (OffC-IP), which means that the miner cannot achieve any additional revenue by separately conducting an off-chain auction to determine on-chain inclusion. They observe that a cryptographic second-price auction satisfies both properties, but leave open the question of whether other mechanisms (such as those not dependent on cryptography) satisfy these properties. In this paper, we characterize OffC-IP TFMs: They are those satisfying a burn identity relating the burn rule to the allocation rule. In particular, we show that auction is OffC-IP if and only if its (induced direct-revelation) allocation rule X̄(⋅) and burn rule B̅(⋅) (both of which take as input users' values v₁, … , v_n) are truthful when viewing (X̄(⋅), B̅(⋅)) as the allocation and pricing rule of a multi-item auction for a single additive buyer with values (φ(v₁),…, φ(v_n)) equal to the users' virtual values. Building on this burn identity, we characterize OffC-IP and OnC-S TFMs that are deterministic and do not use cryptography: They are posted-price mechanisms with specially-tuned burns. As a corollary, we show that such TFMs can only exist with infinite supply and prior-dependence. However, we show that for randomized TFMs, there are additional OnC-S and OffC-IP auctions that do not use cryptography (even when there is {finite} supply, under prior-dependence with a bounded prior distribution). Holistically, our results show that while OffC-IP is a fairly stringent requirement, families of OffC-IP mechanisms can be found for a variety of settings.
Cite as

Aadityan Ganesh, Clayton Thomas, and S. Matthew Weinberg. Characterizing Off-Chain Influence Proof Transaction Fee Mechanisms. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 65:1-65:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ganesh_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.65,
  author =	{Ganesh, Aadityan and Thomas, Clayton and Weinberg, S. Matthew},
  title =	{{Characterizing Off-Chain Influence Proof Transaction Fee Mechanisms}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{65:1--65:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.65},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253527},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.65},
  annote =	{Keywords: Transaction Fee Mechanism Design, Off-Chain Influence Proofness, Blockchain, Decentralized Finance, Simple Auctions}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.2
From Principles to Practice: Algorithmic Insights from Building the Internet Computer (Invited Talk)

Authors: Yvonne-Anne Pignolet

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
The theoretical bedrock of distributed computing rests on foundational primitives: peer-to-peer protocols, Byzantine fault tolerance, state machine replication. But what happens when these principles are stretched to a global, evolving, decentralized compute platform intended to host arbitrary applications? For the past seven years, our work has been dedicated to answering that question through the Internet Computer (IC), a public blockchain network designed for large-scale, general-purpose computation. The IC acts as a stateful serverless cloud[Maksym Arutyunyan et al., 2023], running over 900K applications for millions of users by implementing the Internet Computer Protocol (ICP)[Jan Camenisch et al., 2022] in a sharded, Byzantine-fault-tolerant setup. This talk explores the algorithmic insights gained from this journey. We will confront where our cherished theoretical models were challenged and had to be radically adapted, composed, or re-imagined. Specifically, we will dive into core problems like: - Scalable orchestration: Asynchronous and trustless composition of independent state machines. - Taming Non-Determinism: Designing protocols that allow deterministic replicated state machines to securely query external data. - The Paradox of Immutability: Enabling stateful upgrades for decentralized applications and even the underlying protocol stack without sacrificing security. I will share the successful design patterns that emerged, detail which core protocols stood the test of time, and which others we overhauled. Finally, I will discuss the hard and sometimes surprising trade-offs we made and pose open research questions to address when designing the next generation of decentralized systems.
Cite as

Yvonne-Anne Pignolet. From Principles to Practice: Algorithmic Insights from Building the Internet Computer (Invited Talk). In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, p. 2:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pignolet:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.2,
  author =	{Pignolet, Yvonne-Anne},
  title =	{{From Principles to Practice: Algorithmic Insights from Building the Internet Computer}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251756},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Internet Computer Protocol, blockchain, state machine replication, Byzantine fault tolerance}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.8
Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust

Authors: Ignacio Amores-Sesar, Christian Cachin, Simon Holmgaard Kamp, and Juan Villacis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
In distributed systems with asymmetric trust, each participant is free to make its own trust assumptions about others, captured by an asymmetric quorum system. This contrasts with ordinary, symmetric quorum systems and threshold models, where trust assumptions are uniformly shared among participants. Fundamental problems like reliable broadcast and consensus are unsolvable in the asymmetric model if quorum systems satisfy only the classical properties of consistency and availability. Existing approaches overcome this by introducing stronger assumptions. We show that some of these assumptions are overly restrictive, so much so that they effectively eliminate the benefits of asymmetric trust. To address this, we propose a new approach to characterize asymmetric problems and, building upon it, present algorithms for reliable broadcast and consensus that require weaker assumptions than previous solutions. Our methods are general and can be extended to other core problems in systems with asymmetric trust.
Cite as

Ignacio Amores-Sesar, Christian Cachin, Simon Holmgaard Kamp, and Juan Villacis. Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 8:1-8:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amoressesar_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.8,
  author =	{Amores-Sesar, Ignacio and Cachin, Christian and Kamp, Simon Holmgaard and Villacis, Juan},
  title =	{{Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251812},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asymmetric Trust, Quorum Systems, Reliable Broadcast, Consensus}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.66
Brief Announcement: Single-Round Broadcast: Impossibility, Feasibility, and More

Authors: Zhelei Zhou, Bingsheng Zhang, Hong-Sheng Zhou, and Kui Ren

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Broadcast is a fundamental primitive that plays an important role in secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) area. In this work, we revisit the broadcast with selective abort (hereafter, short for broadcast) proposed by Goldwasser and Lindell (DISC 2002; JoC 2005) and study the round complexity of broadcast under different setup assumptions. Our findings are summarized as follows: - We formally prove that 1-round broadcast is impossible under various widely-used setup assumptions (e.g., plain model, random oracle model, and common reference string model, etc.), even if we consider the static security and the stand-alone framework. More concretely, we formalize a notion called consistent oracle to capture these setups, and prove that our impossibility holds under the consistent oracle. Our impossibility holds in both honest majority setting and dishonest majority setting. - We show that 1-round broadcast protocol is possible in the Universal Composition (UC) framework, by assuming stateful trusted hardwares. Our protocol can be proven secure against all-but-one adaptive and malicious corruptions. We bypass our impossibility result since our stateful trusted hardwares do not satisfy the definition of consistent oracle. - We provide an application of 1-round broadcast: we construct the first 1-round multiple-verifier zero-knowledge (which is a special case of MPC) protocol, without assuming the broadcast hybrid world.
Cite as

Zhelei Zhou, Bingsheng Zhang, Hong-Sheng Zhou, and Kui Ren. Brief Announcement: Single-Round Broadcast: Impossibility, Feasibility, and More. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 66:1-66:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhou_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.66,
  author =	{Zhou, Zhelei and Zhang, Bingsheng and Zhou, Hong-Sheng and Ren, Kui},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Single-Round Broadcast: Impossibility, Feasibility, and More}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{66:1--66:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.66},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248838},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.66},
  annote =	{Keywords: Broadcast, Security with abort, Round optimality}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.50
Brief Announcement: Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust

Authors: Christian Cachin and Juan Villacis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
In protocols with asymmetric trust, each participant is free to make its own trust assumptions about others, captured by an asymmetric quorum system. This contrasts with ordinary, symmetric quorum systems and threshold models, where trust assumptions are uniformly shared among participants. Fundamental problems like reliable broadcast and consensus are unsolvable in the asymmetric model if quorum systems satisfy only the classical properties of consistency and availability. As a result, existing solutions introduce stronger assumptions to circumvent this limitation. We show that some requirements used by state-of-the-art approaches are overly restrictive, so much so that they effectively eliminate the benefits of asymmetric trust. To address this, we propose a new approach to characterize asymmetric problems and, building upon it, present an asymmetric asynchronous unauthenticated reliable broadcast algorithm that significantly weakens the assumptions needed to solve the problem. Our techniques are general and can be readily adapted to other core problems in the asymmetric trust setting.
Cite as

Christian Cachin and Juan Villacis. Brief Announcement: Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 50:1-50:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cachin_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.50,
  author =	{Cachin, Christian and Villacis, Juan},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Weaker Assumptions for Asymmetric Trust}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{50:1--50:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.50},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248667},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.50},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asymmetric Trust, Quorum Systems, Reliable Broadcast}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3
Fast, Private and Regulated Payments in Asynchronous Networks

Authors: Maxence Brugeres, Victor Languille, Petr Kuznetsov, and Hamza Zarfaoui

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
We propose a decentralized asset-transfer system that enjoys full privacy: no party can learn the details of a transaction, except for its issuer and its recipient. Furthermore, the recipient is not aware of the sender’s identity. Our system does not rely on consensus or synchrony assumptions, and therefore, it is responsive, since it runs at the actual network speed. Under the hood, every transaction creates a consumable coin equipped with a non-interactive zero-knowledge proof (NIZK) that confirms that the issuer has sufficient funds without revealing any information about her identity, the recipient’s identity, or the payment amount. Moreover, we equip our system with a regulatory enforcement mechanism that can be used to regulate transfer limits or restrict specific addresses from sending or receiving funds, while preserving the system’s privacy guarantees. Finally, we report on PaxPay, our implementation of Fully Private Asset Transfer (FPAT) that uses the Gnark library for the NIZKs. In our benchmark, PaxPay exhibits better performance than earlier proposals that either ensure only partial privacy, require some kind of network synchrony or do not implement regulation features. Our system thus reconciles privacy, responsiveness, regulation enforcement and performance.
Cite as

Maxence Brugeres, Victor Languille, Petr Kuznetsov, and Hamza Zarfaoui. Fast, Private and Regulated Payments in Asynchronous Networks. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 3:1-3:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brugeres_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3,
  author =	{Brugeres, Maxence and Languille, Victor and Kuznetsov, Petr and Zarfaoui, Hamza},
  title =	{{Fast, Private and Regulated Payments in Asynchronous Networks}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247227},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Anonymous, Asset Transfer, Asynchronous System, BFT, CBDC, NIZK, Payment System, Privacy, Regulation, Scalability, zk-SNARK}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.19
Two-Tier Black-Box Blockchains and Application to Instant Layer-1 Payments

Authors: Michele Ciampi, Yun Lu, Rafail Ostrovsky, and Vassilis Zikas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
Common blockchain protocols are monolithic, i.e., their security relies on a single assumption, e.g., honest majority of hashing power (Bitcoin) or stake (Cardano, Algorand, Ethereum). In contrast, so-called optimistic approaches (Thunderella, Meshcash) rely on a combination of assumptions to achieve faster transaction liveness. We revisit, redesign, and augment the optimistic paradigm to a tiered approach. Our design assumes a primary (Tier 1) and a secondary (Tier 2, also referred to as fallback) blockchain, and achieves full security also in a tiered fashion: If the assumption underpinning the primary chain holds, then we guarantee safety, liveness and censorship resistance, irrespectively of the status of the fallback chain. And even if the primary assumption fails, all security properties are still satisfied (albeit with a temporary slow down) provided the fallback assumption holds. To our knowledge, no existing optimistic or tiered approach preserves both safety and liveness when any one of its underlying blockchain (assumptions) fails. The above is achieved by a new detection-and-recovery mechanism that links the two blockchains, so that any violation of safety, liveness, or censorship resistance on the (faster) primary blockchain is temporary - it is swiftly detected and recovered on the secondary chain - and thus cannot result in a persistent fork or halt of the blockchain ledger. We instantiate the above paradigm using a primary chain based on proof of reputation (PoR) and a fallback chain based on proof of stake (PoS). Our construction uses the PoR and PoS blockchains in a mostly black-box manner - where rather than assuming a concrete construction we distil abstract properties on the two blockchains that are sufficient for applying our tiered methodology. In fact, choosing reputation as the resource of the primary chain opens the door to an incentive mechanism - which we devise and analyze - that tokenizes reputation in order to deter cheating and boost participation (on both the primary/PoR and the fallback/PoS blockchain). As we demonstrate, such tokenization in combination with interpreting reputation as a built-in system-wide credit score, allows for embedding in our two-tiered methodology a novel mechanism which provides collateral-free, multi-use payment-channel-like functionality where payments can be instantly confirmed.
Cite as

Michele Ciampi, Yun Lu, Rafail Ostrovsky, and Vassilis Zikas. Two-Tier Black-Box Blockchains and Application to Instant Layer-1 Payments. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 19:1-19:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ciampi_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.19,
  author =	{Ciampi, Michele and Lu, Yun and Ostrovsky, Rafail and Zikas, Vassilis},
  title =	{{Two-Tier Black-Box Blockchains and Application to Instant Layer-1 Payments}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247380},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fault tolerant blockchain, instantly confirmed payments}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.7
Asymmetric Distributed Trust

Authors: Christian Cachin and Björn Tackmann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 153, 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)

Abstract
Quorum systems are a key abstraction in distributed fault-tolerant computing for capturing trust assumptions. They can be found at the core of many algorithms for implementing reliable broadcasts, shared memory, consensus and other problems. This paper introduces asymmetric Byzantine quorum systems that model subjective trust. Every process is free to choose which combinations of other processes it trusts and which ones it considers faulty. Asymmetric quorum systems strictly generalize standard Byzantine quorum systems, which have only one global trust assumption for all processes. This work also presents protocols that implement abstractions of shared memory and broadcast primitives with processes prone to Byzantine faults and asymmetric trust. The model and protocols pave the way for realizing more elaborate algorithms with asymmetric trust.
Cite as

Christian Cachin and Björn Tackmann. Asymmetric Distributed Trust. In 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 153, pp. 7:1-7:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cachin_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.7,
  author =	{Cachin, Christian and Tackmann, Bj\"{o}rn},
  title =	{{Asymmetric Distributed Trust}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-133-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{153},
  editor =	{Felber, Pascal and Friedman, Roy and Gilbert, Seth and Miller, Avery},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-117933},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quorums, consensus, distributed trust, blockchains, cryptocurrencies}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2019.39
Brief Announcement: Asymmetric Distributed Trust

Authors: Christian Cachin and Björn Tackmann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 146, 33rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2019)

Abstract
Quorum systems are a key abstraction in distributed fault-tolerant computing for capturing trust assumptions. They can be found at the core of many algorithms for implementing reliable broadcasts, shared memory, consensus and other problems. This paper introduces asymmetric Byzantine quorum systems that model subjective trust. Every process is free to choose which combinations of other processes it trusts and which ones it considers faulty. Asymmetric quorum systems strictly generalize standard Byzantine quorum systems, which have only one global trust assumption for all processes. This work also presents protocols that implement abstractions of shared memory and broadcast primitives with processes prone to Byzantine faults and asymmetric trust. The model and protocols pave the way for realizing more elaborate algorithms with asymmetric trust.
Cite as

Christian Cachin and Björn Tackmann. Brief Announcement: Asymmetric Distributed Trust. In 33rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 146, pp. 39:1-39:3, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cachin_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2019.39,
  author =	{Cachin, Christian and Tackmann, Bj\"{o}rn},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Asymmetric Distributed Trust}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2019)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:3},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-126-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{146},
  editor =	{Suomela, Jukka},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2019.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-113460},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2019.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quorums, consensus, distributed trust, blockchains, cryptocurrencies}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 9 Document/PDF
  • 7 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2019

  • Refine by Author
  • 4 Cachin, Christian
  • 2 Tackmann, Björn
  • 2 Villacis, Juan
  • 1 Amores-Sesar, Ignacio
  • 1 Brugeres, Maxence
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 9 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 2 Computer systems organization → Dependable and fault-tolerant systems and networks
  • 2 Security and privacy
  • 2 Security and privacy → Cryptography
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Distributed systems organizing principles
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Asymmetric Trust
  • 2 Quorum Systems
  • 2 Quorums
  • 2 Reliable Broadcast
  • 2 blockchains
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact