50 Search Results for "Arvind, V."

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.52
Upper and Lower Bounds for the Linear Ordering Principle

Authors: Edward A. Hirsch and Ilya Volkovich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Korten and Pitassi (FOCS, 2024) defined a new complexity class L₂^P as the polynomial-time Turing closure of the Linear Ordering Principle (a total function extending finding the minimum of an order [M. Chiari and J. Krajíček, 1998] to the case where the order is not linear). They put it between MA (Merlin-Arthur protocols) and S₂^P (the second symmetric level of the polynomial hierarchy). In this paper we sandwich L₂^P between P^prMA and P^prSBP. (The oracles here are promise problems, and SBP is the only known class between MA and AM.) The containment in P^prSBP is proved via an iterative process that uses a prSBP oracle to estimate the average order rank of a subset and find the minimum of a linear order. Another containment result of this paper is P^prO₂^P ⊆ O₂^P (where O₂^P is the input-oblivious version of S₂^P). These containment results altogether have several byproducts: - We give an affirmative answer to an open question posed by Chakaravarthy and Roy (Computational Complexity, 2011) whether P^prMA ⊆ S₂^P, thereby settling the relative standing of the existing (non-oblivious) Karp–Lipton–style collapse results of [V. T. Chakaravarthy and S. Roy, 2011] and [J.-Y. Cai, 2007], - We give an affirmative answer to an open question of Korten and Pitassi whether a Karp-Lipton-style collapse can be proven for L₂^P, - We show that the Karp-Lipton-style collapse to P^prOMA is actually better than both known collapses to P^prMA due to Chakaravarthy and Roy (Computational Complexity, 2011) and to O₂^P also due to Chakaravarthy and Roy (STACS, 2006). Thus we resolve the controversy between previously incomparable Karp-Lipton collapses stemming from these two lines of research.
Cite as

Edward A. Hirsch and Ilya Volkovich. Upper and Lower Bounds for the Linear Ordering Principle. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 52:1-52:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hirsch_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.52,
  author =	{Hirsch, Edward A. and Volkovich, Ilya},
  title =	{{Upper and Lower Bounds for the Linear Ordering Principle}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{52:1--52:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.52},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255410},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.52},
  annote =	{Keywords: Complexity Classes, Structural Complexity Theory, Linear Ordering Principle, Symmetric Alternation, Merlin-Arthur Protocols, Karp-Lipton Collapse}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.49
Debordering Closure Results in Determinantal and Pfaffian Ideals

Authors: Anakin Dey and Zeyu Guo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
One important question in algebraic complexity is understanding the complexity of polynomial ideals (Grochow, Bulletin of EATCS 131, 2020). Andrews and Forbes (STOC 2022) studied the determinantal ideals I^{det}_{n,m,r} generated by the r× r minors of n× m matrices. Over fields of characteristic zero or of sufficiently large characteristic, they showed that for any nonzero f ∈ I^{det}_{n,m,r}, the determinant of a t × t matrix of variables with t = Θ{r^{1/3}} is approximately computed by a constant-depth, polynomial-size f-oracle algebraic circuit, in the sense that the determinant lies in the border of such circuits. An analogous result was also obtained for Pfaffians in the same paper. In this work, we deborder the result of Andrews and Forbes by showing that when f has polynomial degree, the determinant is in fact exactly computed by a constant-depth, polynomial-size f-oracle algebraic circuit. We further establish an analogous result for Pfaffian ideals. Our results are established using the isolation lemma, combined with a careful analysis of straightening-law expansions of polynomials in determinantal and Pfaffian ideals.
Cite as

Anakin Dey and Zeyu Guo. Debordering Closure Results in Determinantal and Pfaffian Ideals. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 49:1-49:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dey_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.49,
  author =	{Dey, Anakin and Guo, Zeyu},
  title =	{{Debordering Closure Results in Determinantal and Pfaffian Ideals}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{49:1--49:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.49},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253363},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.49},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic circuit complexity, Isolation lemma, Debordering}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.3
Linear Matroid Intersection Is in Catalytic Logspace

Authors: Aryan Agarwala, Yaroslav Alekseev, and Antoine Vinciguerra

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Linear matroid intersection is an important problem in combinatorial optimization. Given two linear matroids over the same ground set, the linear matroid intersection problem asks you to find a common independent set of maximum size. The deep interest in linear matroid intersection is due to the fact that it generalises many classical problems in theoretical computer science, such as bipartite matching, edge disjoint spanning trees, rainbow spanning tree, and many more. We study this problem in the model of catalytic computation: space-bounded machines are granted access to catalytic space, which is additional working memory that is full with arbitrary data that must be preserved at the end of its computation. Although linear matroid intersection has had a polynomial time algorithm for over 50 years, it remains an important open problem to show that linear matroid intersection belongs to any well studied subclass of {P}. We address this problem for the class catalytic logspace (CL) with a polynomial time bound (CLP). Recently, Agarwala and Mertz (2025) showed that bipartite maximum matching can be computed in the class CLP ⊆ {P}. This was the first subclass of {P} shown to contain bipartite matching, and additionally the first problem outside TC¹ shown to be contained in CL. We significantly improve the result of Agarwala and Mertz by showing that linear matroid intersection can be computed in CLP.
Cite as

Aryan Agarwala, Yaroslav Alekseev, and Antoine Vinciguerra. Linear Matroid Intersection Is in Catalytic Logspace. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 3:1-3:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{agarwala_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.3,
  author =	{Agarwala, Aryan and Alekseev, Yaroslav and Vinciguerra, Antoine},
  title =	{{Linear Matroid Intersection Is in Catalytic Logspace}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252908},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Catalytic Computing, Computational Complexity, Matroid Theory, Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113
Multi-Quadratic Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds Imply VNC ¹ ≠ VNP

Authors: Benjamin Rossman and Davidson Zhu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The sum-of-squares (SoS) complexity of a d-multiquadratic polynomial f (quadratic in each of d blocks of n variables) is the minimum s such that f = ∑_{i = 1}^s g_i² with each g_i d-multilinear. In the case d = 2, Hrubeš, Wigderson and Yehudayoff [Hrubeš et al., 2011] showed that an n^{1+Ω(1)} lower bound on the SoS complexity of explicit biquadratic polynomials implies an exponential lower bound for non-commutative arithmetic circuits. In this paper, we establish an analogous connection between general multiquadratic sum-of-squares and commutative arithmetic formulas. Specifically, we show that an n^{d-o(log d)} lower bound on the SoS complexity of explicit d-multiquadratic polynomials, for any d = d(n) with ω(1) ≤ d(n) ≤ O((log n)/(log log n)), would separate the algebraic complexity classes VNC¹ and VNP.
Cite as

Benjamin Rossman and Davidson Zhu. Multi-Quadratic Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds Imply VNC ¹ ≠ VNP. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 113:1-113:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rossman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113,
  author =	{Rossman, Benjamin and Zhu, Davidson},
  title =	{{Multi-Quadratic Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds Imply VNC ¹ ≠ VNP}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{113:1--113:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254006},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113},
  annote =	{Keywords: sum-of-squares, arithmetic formulas}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9
Contention-Aware Cooperation

Authors: Timothé Albouy, Davide Frey, Mathieu Gestin, Michel Raynal, and François Taïani

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
As shown by Reliable Broadcast and Consensus, cooperation among a set of independent computing entities (sequential processes) is crucial in fault-tolerant distributed computing. Considering n-process asynchronous message-passing systems where some processes may be Byzantine, this paper introduces a novel cooperation abstraction, Contention-Aware Cooperation (CAC). While Reliable Broadcast is a one-to-n cooperation abstraction and Consensus is an n-to-n cooperation abstraction, CAC is a d-to-n cooperation abstraction where d (1 ≤ d ≤ n) varies with each run and remains unknown to the processes. Correct processes accept the same set of 𝓁 pairs ⟨ v,i ⟩ (v is the value proposed by p_i) from the d proposer processes, where 1 ≤ 𝓁 ≤ d and (as d) 𝓁 remains unknown to the processes (except in specific cases). Those 𝓁 values are accepted one at a time, potentially in different orders at each process. In addition, CAC provides each process with an imperfect oracle that provides insights into the values that they may accept in the future. Interestingly, the CAC abstraction is particularly efficient in favorable circumstances, when the oracle becomes accurate, which processes can detect. To illustrate its practical utility, the paper details two applications leveraging CAC: a fast consensus implementation optimized for low contention (named Cascading Consensus), and a novel naming problem that can be solved under full asynchrony. All algorithms presented require signatures.
Cite as

Timothé Albouy, Davide Frey, Mathieu Gestin, Michel Raynal, and François Taïani. Contention-Aware Cooperation. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 9:1-9:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albouy_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9,
  author =	{Albouy, Timoth\'{e} and Frey, Davide and Gestin, Mathieu and Raynal, Michel and Ta\"{i}ani, Fran\c{c}ois},
  title =	{{Contention-Aware Cooperation}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251823},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Agreement, Asynchronous message-passing system, Byzantine processes, Conflict detection, Consensus, Cooperation abstraction, Distributed computing, Fault tolerance, Optimistically terminating consensus, Short-naming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.20
Deterministically Counting k-Paths and Trees Parameterized by Treewidth in Single-Exponential Time

Authors: Jonne Visser and Hans L. Bodlaender

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we give new and faster deterministic algorithms to count the number of k-paths and trees in host graphs of bounded treewidth. Our algorithms use time that is single-exponential in the treewidth, and employ the determinant method from [Hans L. Bodlaender et al., 2015]. Modifications of the algorithms count in single-exponential time the number of k-paths between specified end-points, the number of k-cycles, and the number of trees with k vertices that are a subgraph of the host graph.
Cite as

Jonne Visser and Hans L. Bodlaender. Deterministically Counting k-Paths and Trees Parameterized by Treewidth in Single-Exponential Time. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 20:1-20:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{visser_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.20,
  author =	{Visser, Jonne and Bodlaender, Hans L.},
  title =	{{Deterministically Counting k-Paths and Trees Parameterized by Treewidth in Single-Exponential Time}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251529},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized Complexity, Counting Subgraphs, #k-path, Dynamic Programming, Tree Decomposition, Determinant Method}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.51
Randomized Black-Box PIT for Small Depth +-Regular Non-Commutative Circuits

Authors: G. V. Sumukha Bharadwaj and S. Raja

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we address the black-box polynomial identity testing (PIT) problem for non-commutative polynomials computed by +-regular circuits, a class of homogeneous circuits introduced by Arvind, Joglekar, Mukhopadhyay, and Raja (STOC 2017, Theory of Computing 2019). These circuits can compute polynomials with a number of monomials that are doubly exponential in the circuit size. They gave an efficient randomized PIT algorithm for +-regular circuits of depth 3 and posed the problem of developing an efficient black-box PIT for higher depths as an open problem. Our work makes progress on this open problem by resolving it for constant-depth +-regular circuits. We present a randomized black-box polynomial-time algorithm for +-regular circuits of any constant depth. Specifically, our algorithm runs in s^{O(d²)} time, where s and d represent the size and the depth of the +-regular circuit, respectively. Our approach combines several key techniques in a novel way. We employ a nondeterministic substitution automaton that transforms the polynomial into a structured form and utilizes polynomial sparsification along with commutative transformations to maintain non-zeroness. Additionally, we introduce matrix composition, coefficient modification via the automaton, and multi-entry outputs - methods that have not previously been applied in the context of black-box PIT. Together, these techniques enable us to effectively handle exponential degrees and doubly exponential sparsity in non-commutative settings, enabling polynomial identity testing for higher-depth circuits. In particular, we show that if f is a non-zero non-commutative polynomial in n variables over the field 𝔽, computed by a depth-d +-regular circuit of size s, then f cannot be a polynomial identity for the matrix algebra 𝕄_{N}(𝔽), where N = s^{O(d²)} and the size of the field 𝔽 depends on the degree of f. Interestingly, the size of the matrices does not depend on the degree of f. Our result can be interpreted as an Amitsur-Levitzki-type result [Amitsur and Levitzki, 1950] for polynomials computed by small-depth +-regular circuits.
Cite as

G. V. Sumukha Bharadwaj and S. Raja. Randomized Black-Box PIT for Small Depth +-Regular Non-Commutative Circuits. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 51:1-51:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sumukhabharadwaj_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.51,
  author =	{Sumukha Bharadwaj, G. V. and Raja, S.},
  title =	{{Randomized Black-Box PIT for Small Depth +-Regular Non-Commutative Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{51:1--51:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.51},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250949},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.51},
  annote =	{Keywords: Polynomial Identity Testing, Non-commutative Circuits, Algebraic Circuits, +-Regular Circuits, Black-Box}
}
Document
Survey
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.2.1
Resilience in Knowledge Graph Embeddings

Authors: Arnab Sharma, N'Dah Jean Kouagou, and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 2 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 2

Abstract
In recent years, knowledge graphs have gained interest and witnessed widespread applications in various domains, such as information retrieval, question-answering, recommendation systems, amongst others. Large-scale knowledge graphs to this end have demonstrated their utility in effectively representing structured knowledge. To further facilitate the application of machine learning techniques, knowledge graph embedding models have been developed. Such models can transform entities and relationships within knowledge graphs into vectors. However, these embedding models often face challenges related to noise, missing information, distribution shift, adversarial attacks, etc. This can lead to sub-optimal embeddings and incorrect inferences, thereby negatively impacting downstream applications. While the existing literature has focused so far on adversarial attacks on KGE models, the challenges related to the other critical aspects remain unexplored. In this paper, we, first of all, give a unified definition of resilience, encompassing several factors such as generalisation, in-distribution generalization, distribution adaption, and robustness. After formalizing these concepts for machine learning in general, we define them in the context of knowledge graphs. To find the gap in the existing works on resilience in the context of knowledge graphs, we perform a systematic survey, taking into account all these aspects mentioned previously. Our survey results show that most of the existing works focus on a specific aspect of resilience, namely robustness. After categorizing such works based on their respective aspects of resilience, we discuss the challenges and future research directions.
Cite as

Arnab Sharma, N'Dah Jean Kouagou, and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo. Resilience in Knowledge Graph Embeddings. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 1:1-1:38, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{sharma_et_al:TGDK.3.2.1,
  author =	{Sharma, Arnab and Kouagou, N'Dah Jean and Ngomo, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga},
  title =	{{Resilience in Knowledge Graph Embeddings}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{1:1--1:38},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{2},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.2.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248117},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.2.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge graphs, Resilience, Robustness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.7
Mechanism Design for Automated Market Makers

Authors: T-H. Hubert Chan, Ke Wu, and Elaine Shi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
Blockchains have popularized automated market makers (AMMs), applications that run on a blockchain, maintain a pool of crypto-assets, and execute trades with users governed by some pricing function. AMMs have also introduced a significant challenge known as the Miner Extractable Value (MEV). Specifically, miners who control the contents and sequencing of transactions in a block can extract value by front-running and back-running users' transactions, creating arbitrage opportunities that guarantee them risk-free returns. MEV not only harms ordinary users, but more critically, encourages miners to auction off favorable transaction placements to users and arbitragers. This has fostered a more centralized off-chain eco-system, departing from the decentralized equilibrium originally envisioned for the blockchain infrastructure layer. In this paper, we consider how to design AMM mechanisms that eliminate MEV opportunities. Specifically, we propose a new AMM mechanism that processes all transactions contained within a block according to some pre-defined rules, ensuring that some constant potential function is maintained after processing the batch. We show that our new mechanism satisfies two tiers of guarantees. First, for legacy blockchains where each block is proposed by a single (possibly rotating) miner, we prove that our mechanism satisfies arbitrage resilience, i.e., a miner cannot gain risk-free profit. Second, for blockchains where the block proposal process is decentralized and offers sequencing-fairness, we prove a strictly stronger notion called strategy proofness - roughly speaking, we guarantee that any individual user’s best response is to follow the honest strategy. Our results complement prior works on MEV resilience in the following senses. First, prior works have shown impossibilities to address MEV entirely at the consensus level. Our work demonstrates a new paradigm of mechanism design at the application (i.e., smart contract) layer to ensure provable guarantees of strategy proofness. Second, many works have attempted to augment the underlying consensus protocol with extra properties such as sequencing fairness. While most previous works heuristically argued why these extra properties help to mitigate MEV, our work demonstrates in a mathematically formal manner how to leverage such consensus-level properties to aid the design of strategy-proof mechanisms.
Cite as

T-H. Hubert Chan, Ke Wu, and Elaine Shi. Mechanism Design for Automated Market Makers. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 7:1-7:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chan_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.7,
  author =	{Chan, T-H. Hubert and Wu, Ke and Shi, Elaine},
  title =	{{Mechanism Design for Automated Market Makers}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247265},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mechanism design, game theory, strategy proof, blockchain}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.56
Efficient Polynomial Identity Testing over Nonassociative Algebras

Authors: Partha Mukhopadhyay, C. Ramya, and Pratik Shastri

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We design the first efficient polynomial identity testing algorithms over the nonassociative polynomial algebra. In particular, multiplication among the formal variables is commutative but it is not associative. This complements the strong lower bound results obtained over this algebra by Hrubeš, Yehudayoff, and Wigderson [Pavel Hrubes et al., 2010] and Fijalkow, Lagarde, Ohlmann, and Serre [Fijalkow et al., 2021] from the identity testing perspective. Our main results are the following: - We construct nonassociative algebras (both commutative and noncommutative) which have no low degree identities. As a result, we obtain the first Amitsur-Levitzki type theorems [A. S. Amitsur and J. Levitzki, 1950] over nonassociative polynomial algebras. As a direct consequence, we obtain randomized polynomial-time black-box PIT algorithms for nonassociative polynomials which allow evaluation over such algebras. - On the derandomization side, we give a deterministic polynomial-time identity testing algorithm for nonassociative polynomials given by arithmetic circuits in the white-box setting. Previously, such an algorithm was known with the additional restriction of noncommutativity [Vikraman Arvind et al., 2017]. - In the black-box setting, we construct a hitting set of quasipolynomial-size for nonassociative polynomials computed by arithmetic circuits of small depth. Understanding the black-box complexity of identity testing, even in the randomized setting, was open prior to our work.
Cite as

Partha Mukhopadhyay, C. Ramya, and Pratik Shastri. Efficient Polynomial Identity Testing over Nonassociative Algebras. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 56:1-56:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mukhopadhyay_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.56,
  author =	{Mukhopadhyay, Partha and C. Ramya and Shastri, Pratik},
  title =	{{Efficient Polynomial Identity Testing over Nonassociative Algebras}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{56:1--56:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.56},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244224},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.56},
  annote =	{Keywords: Polynomial identity testing, nonassociative algebra, arithmetic circuits, black-box algorithms, white-box algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.36
On the Complexity of Minimising the Moving Distance for Dispersing Objects

Authors: Nicolás Honorato-Droguett, Kazuhiro Kurita, Tesshu Hanaka, and Hirotaka Ono

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 349, 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)

Abstract
We study Geometric Graph Edit Distance (GGED), a graph-editing model to compute the minimum edit distance of intersection graphs that uses moving objects as an edit operation. We first show an O(n log n)-time algorithm that minimises the total moving distance to disperse unit intervals. This algorithm is applied to render a given unit interval graph (i) edgeless, (ii) acyclic and (iii) k-clique-free. We next show that GGED becomes strongly NP-hard when rendering a weighted interval graph (i) edgeless, (ii) acyclic and (iii) k-clique-free. Lastly, we prove that minimising the maximum moving distance for rendering a unit disk graph edgeless is strongly NP-hard over the L₁ and L₂ distances.
Cite as

Nicolás Honorato-Droguett, Kazuhiro Kurita, Tesshu Hanaka, and Hirotaka Ono. On the Complexity of Minimising the Moving Distance for Dispersing Objects. In 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 349, pp. 36:1-36:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{honoratodroguett_et_al:LIPIcs.WADS.2025.36,
  author =	{Honorato-Droguett, Nicol\'{a}s and Kurita, Kazuhiro and Hanaka, Tesshu and Ono, Hirotaka},
  title =	{{On the Complexity of Minimising the Moving Distance for Dispersing Objects}},
  booktitle =	{19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-398-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{349},
  editor =	{Morin, Pat and Oh, Eunjin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242673},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Intersection graphs, Optimisation, Graph modification}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.88
Color Refinement for Relational Structures

Authors: Benjamin Scheidt and Nicole Schweikardt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 345, 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)

Abstract
Color Refinement, also known as Naive Vertex Classification, is a classical method to distinguish graphs by iteratively computing a coloring of their vertices. While it is traditionally used as an imperfect way to test for isomorphism, the algorithm has permeated many other, seemingly unrelated, areas of computer science. The method is algorithmically simple, and it has a well-understood distinguishing power: it has been logically characterized by Immerman and Lander (1990) and Cai, Fürer, Immerman (1992), who showed that it distinguishes precisely those graphs that can be distinguished by a sentence of first-order logic with counting quantifiers and only two variables. A combinatorial characterization was given by Dvořák (2010), who showed that it distinguishes precisely those graphs that differ in the number of homomorphisms from some tree. In this paper, we introduce Relational Color Refinement (RCR, for short), a generalization of the Color Refinement method from graphs to arbitrary relational structures, whose distinguishing power admits the equivalent combinatorial and logical characterizations as Color Refinement has on graphs: we show that RCR distinguishes precisely those structures that differ in the number of homomorphisms from an acyclic connected relational structure. Further, we show that RCR distinguishes precisely those structures that are distinguished by a sentence of the guarded fragment of first-order logic with counting quantifiers. Additionally, we show that for every fixed finite relational signature, RCR can be implemented to run on structures of that signature in time O(N⋅log N), where N denotes the number of tuples present in the structure.
Cite as

Benjamin Scheidt and Nicole Schweikardt. Color Refinement for Relational Structures. In 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 345, pp. 88:1-88:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{scheidt_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.88,
  author =	{Scheidt, Benjamin and Schweikardt, Nicole},
  title =	{{Color Refinement for Relational Structures}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)},
  pages =	{88:1--88:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-388-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{345},
  editor =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Mazowiecki, Filip and Skrzypczak, Micha{\l}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.88},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-241958},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.88},
  annote =	{Keywords: color refinement, counting logics, homomorphism counts, homomorphism indistinguishability, guarded logics, pebble games, relational structures, alpha-acyclicity, join-trees}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.5
Improved Separation Between Quantum and Classical Computers for Sampling and Functional Tasks

Authors: Simon C. Marshall, Scott Aaronson, and Vedran Dunjko

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
This paper furthers existing evidence that quantum computers are capable of computations beyond classical computers. Specifically, we strengthen the collapse of the polynomial hierarchy to the second level if: (i) Quantum computers with postselection are as powerful as classical computers with postselection (PostBQP = PostBPP), (ii) any one of several quantum sampling experiments (BosonSampling, IQP, DQC1) can be approximately performed by a classical computer (contingent on existing assumptions). This last result implies that if any of these experiment’s hardness conjectures hold, then quantum computers can implement functions classical computers cannot (FBQP≠ FBPP) unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its 2nd level. These results are an improvement over previous work which either achieved a collapse to the third level or were concerned with exact sampling, a physically impractical case. The workhorse of these results is a new technical complexity-theoretic result which we believe could have value beyond quantum computation. In particular, we prove that if there exists an equivalence between problems solvable with an exact counting oracle and problems solvable with an approximate counting oracle, then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its second level, indeed to ZPP^NP.
Cite as

Simon C. Marshall, Scott Aaronson, and Vedran Dunjko. Improved Separation Between Quantum and Classical Computers for Sampling and Functional Tasks. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 5:1-5:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{marshall_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.5,
  author =	{Marshall, Simon C. and Aaronson, Scott and Dunjko, Vedran},
  title =	{{Improved Separation Between Quantum and Classical Computers for Sampling and Functional Tasks}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236991},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantum advantage, Approximate counting, Boson sampling}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.22
Multiplicative Extractors for Samplable Distributions

Authors: Ronen Shaltiel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Trevisan and Vadhan (FOCS 2000) introduced the notion of (seedless) extractors for samplable distributions as a way to extract random keys for cryptographic protocols from weak sources of randomness. They showed that under a very strong complexity theoretic assumption, there exists a constant α > 0 such that for every constant c ≥ 1, there is an extractor Ext:{0,1}ⁿ → {0,1}^Ω(n), such that for every distribution X over {0,1}ⁿ with H_∞(X) ≥ (1-α) ⋅ n that is samplable by size n^c circuits, the distribution Ext(X) is ε-close to uniform for ε = 1/(n^c), and furthermore, Ext is computable in time poly(n^c). Recently, Ball, Goldin, Dachman-Soled and Mutreja (FOCS 2023) gave a substantial improvement, and achieved the same conclusion under the weaker (and by now standard) assumption that there exists a constant β > 0, and a problem in E = DTIME(2^O(n)) that requires size 2^(βn) nondeterministic circuits. In this paper we give an alternative proof of this result with the following advantages: - Our extractors have "multiplicative error": It is guaranteed that for every event A ⊆ {0,1}^m, Pr[Ext(X) ∈ A] ≤ (1+ε) ⋅ Pr[U_m ∈ A]. (This should be contrasted with the standard notion that only implies Pr[Ext(X) ∈ A] ≤ ε + Pr[U_m ∈ A]). Consequently, unlike the (additive) extractors of Trevisan and Vadhan, and Ball et al., our multiplicative extractors guarantee that in the application of selecting keys for cryptographic protocols, if when choosing a random key, the probability that an adversary can steal the honest party’s money is n^{-ω(1)}, then this also holds when using the output of the extractor as a key. Our multiplicative extractors are a key component in the recent subsequent work of Ball, Shaltiel and Silbak (STOC 2025) that constructs extractors for samplable distributions with low min-entropy. This is another demonstration of the usefulness of multiplicative extractors. We remark that a related notion of multiplicative extractors was defined by Applebaum, Artemenko, Shaltiel and Yang (CCC 2015) who showed that black-box techniques cannot yield extractors with additive error ε = n^{-ω(1)}, under the assumption assumed by Ball et al. or Trevisan and Vadhan. This motivated Applebaum et al. to consider multiplicative extractors, and they gave constructions based on the original hardness assumption of Trevisan and Vadhan. - Our proof is significantly simpler, and more modular than that of Ball et al. (and arguably also than that of Trevisan and Vadhan). A key observation is that the extractors that we want to construct, easily follow from a seed-extending pseudorandom generator against nondeterministic circuits (with the twist that the error is measured multiplicatively, as in computational differential privacy). We then proceed to construct such pseudorandom generators under the hardness assumption. This turns out to be easier (utilizing amongst other things, ideas by Trevisan and Vadhan, and by Ball et al.) Trevisan and Vadhan also asked whether lower bounds against nondeterministic circuits are necessary to achieve extractors for samplable distributions. While we cannot answer this question, we show that the proof techniques used in our paper (as well as those used in previous work) produce extractors which imply seed-extending PRGs against nondeterministic circuits, which in turn imply lower bounds against nondeterministic circuits.
Cite as

Ronen Shaltiel. Multiplicative Extractors for Samplable Distributions. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 22:1-22:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shaltiel:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.22,
  author =	{Shaltiel, Ronen},
  title =	{{Multiplicative Extractors for Samplable Distributions}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237163},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Randomness Extractors, Samplable Distributions, Hardness vsRandomness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.20
Counting Martingales for Measure and Dimension in Complexity Classes

Authors: John M. Hitchcock, Adewale Sekoni, and Hadi Shafei

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
This paper makes two primary contributions. First, we introduce the concept of counting martingales and use it to define counting measures and counting dimensions. Second, we apply these new tools to strengthen previous circuit lower bounds. Resource-bounded measure and dimension have traditionally focused on deterministic time and space bounds. We use counting complexity classes to develop resource-bounded counting measures and dimensions. Counting martingales are constructed using functions from the #𝖯, SpanP, and GapP complexity classes. We show that counting martingales capture many martingale constructions in complexity theory. The resulting counting measures and dimensions are intermediate in power between the standard time-bounded and space-bounded notions, enabling finer-grained analysis where space-bounded measures are known, but time-bounded measures remain open. For example, we show that BPP has #𝖯-dimension 0 and BQP has GapP-dimension 0, whereas the 𝖯-dimensions of these classes remain open. As our main application, we improve circuit-size lower bounds. Lutz (1992) strengthened Shannon’s classic (1-ε) 2ⁿ/n lower bound (1949) to PSPACE-measure, showing that almost all problems require circuits of size (2ⁿ/n)(1+(α log n)/n), for any α < 1. We extend this result to SpanP-measure, with a proof that uses a connection through the Minimum Circuit Size Problem (MCSP) to construct a counting martingale. Our results imply that the stronger lower bound holds within the third level of the exponential-time hierarchy, whereas previously, it was only known in ESPACE. Under a derandomization hypothesis, this lower bound holds within the second level of the exponential-time hierarchy, specifically in the class 𝖤^NP. We also study the #𝖯-dimension of classical circuit complexity classes and the GapP-dimension of quantum circuit complexity classes.
Cite as

John M. Hitchcock, Adewale Sekoni, and Hadi Shafei. Counting Martingales for Measure and Dimension in Complexity Classes. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 20:1-20:35, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hitchcock_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.20,
  author =	{Hitchcock, John M. and Sekoni, Adewale and Shafei, Hadi},
  title =	{{Counting Martingales for Measure and Dimension in Complexity Classes}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:35},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237145},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: resource-bounded measure, resource-bounded dimension, counting martingales, counting complexity, circuit complexity, Kolmogorov complexity, quantum complexity, Minimum Circuit Size Problem}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 50 Document/PDF
  • 32 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 5 2026
  • 20 2025
  • 5 2024
  • 6 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 12 Arvind, V.
  • 9 Mukhopadhyay, Partha
  • 8 Chatterjee, Abhranil
  • 6 Datta, Rajit
  • 4 Köbler, Johannes
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 40 LIPIcs
  • 1 LITES
  • 8 TGDK
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 8 Theory of computation → Algebraic complexity theory
  • 7 Theory of computation
  • 4 Theory of computation → Complexity classes
  • 4 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • 3 Information systems → Graph-based database models
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 parameterized complexity
  • 2 Explainable AI
  • 2 Knowledge graphs
  • 2 Large Language Models
  • 2 Parameterized Complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact