23 Search Results for "Ben-Eliezer, Omri"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.40
A Simple and Robust Protocol for Distributed Counting

Authors: Edith Cohen, Moshe Shechner, and Uri Stemmer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We revisit the distributed counting problem, where a server must continuously approximate the total number of events occurring across k sites while minimizing communication. The communication complexity of this problem is known to be Θ(k/(ε)log N) for deterministic protocols. Huang, Yi, and Zhang (2012) showed that randomization can reduce this to Θ((√k)/ε log N), but their analysis is restricted to the oblivious setting, where the stream of events is independent of the protocol’s outputs. Xiong, Zhu, and Huang (2023) presented a robust protocol for distributed counting that removes the oblivious assumption. However, their communication complexity is suboptimal by a polylog(k) factor and their protocol is substantially more complex than the oblivious protocol of Huang et al. (2012). This left open a natural question: could it be that the simple protocol of Huang et al. (2012) is already robust? We resolve this question with two main contributions. First, we show that the protocol of Huang et al. (2012) is itself not robust by constructing an explicit adaptive attack that forces it to lose its accuracy. Second, we present a new, surprisingly simple, robust protocol for distributed counting that achieves the optimal communication complexity of O((√k)/ε log N). Our protocol is simpler than that of Xiong et al. (2023), perhaps even simpler than that of Huang et al. (2012), and is the first to match the optimal oblivious complexity in the adaptive setting.
Cite as

Edith Cohen, Moshe Shechner, and Uri Stemmer. A Simple and Robust Protocol for Distributed Counting. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 40:1-40:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.40,
  author =	{Cohen, Edith and Shechner, Moshe and Stemmer, Uri},
  title =	{{A Simple and Robust Protocol for Distributed Counting}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{40:1--40:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.40},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253272},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.40},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed Streaming, Adversarial Streaming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.16
Robust Streaming Against Low-Memory Adversaries

Authors: Omri Ben-Eliezer, Krzysztof Onak, and Sandeep Silwal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Robust streaming, the study of streaming algorithms that provably work when the stream is generated by an adaptive adversary, has seen tremendous progress in recent years. However, fundamental barriers remain: the best known algorithm for turnstile F_p-estimation in the robust streaming setting is exponentially worse than in the oblivious setting, and closing this gap seems difficult. Arguably, one possible cause of this barrier is the adversarial model, which may be too strong: unlike the space-bounded streaming algorithm, the adversary can memorize the entire history of the interaction with the algorithm. Can we then close the exponential gap if we insist that the adversary itself is an adaptive but low-memory entity, roughly as powerful as (or even weaker than) the algorithm? In this work we present the first set of models and results aimed towards this question. We design efficient robust streaming algorithms against adversaries that are fully adaptive but have no long-term memory ("memoryless") or very little memory of the history of interaction. Roughly speaking, a memoryless adversary only sees, at any given round, the last output of the algorithm (and does not even know the current time) and can generate an unlimited number of independent coin tosses. A low-memory adversary is similar, but maintains an additional small buffer. While these adversaries may seem quite limited at first glance, we show that this adversarial model is strong enough to produce streams that have high flip number and density in the context of F₂-estimation, which rules out most known robustification techniques. We then design a new simple approach, similar to the computation paths framework, to obtain efficient algorithms against memoryless and low-memory adversaries for a wide class of order-invariant problems. We conclude by posing various open questions proposing further exploration of the landscape of robust streaming against fully adaptive but computationally constrained adversaries.
Cite as

Omri Ben-Eliezer, Krzysztof Onak, and Sandeep Silwal. Robust Streaming Against Low-Memory Adversaries. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 16:1-16:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beneliezer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.16,
  author =	{Ben-Eliezer, Omri and Onak, Krzysztof and Silwal, Sandeep},
  title =	{{Robust Streaming Against Low-Memory Adversaries}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253037},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: robust streaming, adaptive robustness, bounded-space adversaries}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64
Optimal White-Box Adversarial Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating LIS Length

Authors: Anna Gal, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, and Huacheng Yu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The space complexity of deterministic streaming algorithms for approximating the length of the longest increasing subsequence (LIS) in a string of length n has been known to be Θ̃(√n) for almost two decades. In contrast, the space complexity of this problem for randomized streaming algorithms remains one of the few longstanding open problems in one-pass streaming. In fact, no better than Ω(log n) lower bounds are known, and the best upper bounds are no better than their deterministic counterparts. In this paper, we push the limits of our understanding of the streaming space complexity of the approximate LIS length problem by studying it in the white-box adversarial streaming model. This model is an intermediate model between deterministic and randomized streaming algorithms that has recently attracted attention. In the white-box model, the streaming algorithm can draw fresh randomness when processing each incoming element, but an adversary generating the stream observes all previously used randomness and adaptively chooses the subsequent elements of the stream. We prove a tight (up to logarithmic factors) Ω(√n) space lower bound for any white-box streaming algorithm that approximates the length of the LIS of a stream of length n to within a factor better than 1.1. Thus, for this problem, white-box algorithms offer no improvement over deterministic ones.
Cite as

Anna Gal, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, and Huacheng Yu. Optimal White-Box Adversarial Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating LIS Length. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 64:1-64:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gal_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64,
  author =	{Gal, Anna and Kol, Gillat and Saxena, Raghuvansh R. and Yu, Huacheng},
  title =	{{Optimal White-Box Adversarial Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating LIS Length}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{64:1--64:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253519},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.64},
  annote =	{Keywords: White-bos streaming, Longest increasing subsequence}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.65
Solving Linear Programs with Differential Privacy

Authors: Alina Ene, Huy Le Nguyen, Ta Duy Nguyen, and Adrian Vladu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We study the problem of solving linear programs of the form Ax ≤ b, x ≥ 0 with differential privacy. For homogeneous LPs Ax ≥ 0, we give an efficient (ε,δ)-differentially private algorithm which with probability at least 1-β finds in polynomial time a solution that satisfies all but O(d²/ε log²(d/(δβ))√{log 1/ρ₀}) constraints, for problems with margin ρ₀ > 0. This improves the bound of O(d⁵/ε log^{1.5} 1/ρ₀ polylog(d,1/δ,1/β)) by [Kaplan-Mansour-Moran-Stemmer-Tur, STOC '25]. For general LPs Ax ≤ b, x ≥ 0 with potentially zero margin, we give an efficient (ε,δ)-differentially private algorithm that w.h.p drops O(d⁴/ε log^{2.5} d/δ √{log dU}) constraints, where U is an upper bound for the entries of A and b in absolute value. This improves the result by Kaplan et al. by at least a factor of d⁵. Our techniques build upon privatizing a rescaling perceptron algorithm by [Hoberg-Rothvoss, IPCO '17] and a more refined iterative procedure for identifying equality constraints by Kaplan et al.
Cite as

Alina Ene, Huy Le Nguyen, Ta Duy Nguyen, and Adrian Vladu. Solving Linear Programs with Differential Privacy. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 65:1-65:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ene_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.65,
  author =	{Ene, Alina and Le Nguyen, Huy and Nguyen, Ta Duy and Vladu, Adrian},
  title =	{{Solving Linear Programs with Differential Privacy}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{65:1--65:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.65},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244315},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.65},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Privacy, Linear Programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1
List Decoding Quotient Reed-Muller Codes

Authors: Omri Gotlib, Tali Kaufman, and Shachar Lovett

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Reed-Muller codes consist of evaluations of n-variate polynomials over a finite field 𝔽 with degree at most d. Much like every linear code, Reed-Muller codes can be characterized by constraints, where a codeword is valid if and only if it satisfies all degree-d constraints. For a subset X̃ ⊆ 𝔽ⁿ, we introduce the notion of X̃-quotient Reed-Muller code. A function F:X̃ → 𝔽 is a valid codeword in the quotient code if it satisfies all the constraints of degree-d polynomials lying in X̃. This gives rise to a novel phenomenon: a quotient codeword may have many extensions to original codewords. This weakens the connection between original codewords and quotient codewords which introduces a richer range of behaviors along with substantial new challenges. Our goal is to answer the following question: what properties of X̃ will imply that the quotient code inherits its distance and list-decoding radius from the original code? We address this question using techniques developed by Bhowmick and Lovett [Abhishek Bhowmick and Shachar Lovett, 2014], identifying key properties of 𝔽ⁿ used in their proof and extending them to general subsets X̃ ⊆ 𝔽ⁿ. By introducing a new tool, we overcome the novel challenge in analyzing the quotient code that arises from the weak connection between original and quotient codewords. This enables us to apply known results from additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry [David Kazhdan and Tamar Ziegler, 2018; David Kazhdan and Tamar Ziegler, 2019; Amichai Lampert and Tamar Ziegler, 2021] to show that when X̃ is a high rank variety, X̃-quotient Reed-Muller codes inherit the distance and list-decoding parameters from the original Reed-Muller codes.
Cite as

Omri Gotlib, Tali Kaufman, and Shachar Lovett. List Decoding Quotient Reed-Muller Codes. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 1:1-1:44, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gotlib_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1,
  author =	{Gotlib, Omri and Kaufman, Tali and Lovett, Shachar},
  title =	{{List Decoding Quotient Reed-Muller Codes}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:44},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236957},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reed-Muller Codes, Quotient Code, Quotient Reed-Muller Code, List Decoding, High Rank Variety, High-Order Fourier Analysis, Error-Correcting Codes}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13
Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes

Authors: Meghal Gupta, Venkatesan Guruswami, and Mihir Singhal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
In order to communicate a message over a noisy channel, a sender (Alice) uses an error-correcting code to encode her message, a bitstring x, into a codeword. The receiver (Bob) decodes x correctly whenever there is at most a small constant fraction of adversarial errors in the transmitted codeword. We investigate the setting where Bob is restricted to be a low-space streaming algorithm. Specifically, Bob receives the message as a stream and must process it and write x in order to a write-only tape while using low (say polylogarithmic) space. Note that such a primitive then allows the execution of any downstream streaming computation on x. We show three basic results about this setting, which are informally as follows: [(i)] 1) There is a stream decodable code of near-quadratic length, resilient to error-fractions approaching the optimal bound of 1/4. 2) There is no stream decodable code of sub-quadratic length, even to correct any small constant fraction of errors. 3) If Bob need only compute a private linear function of the bits of x, instead of writing them all to the output tape, there is a stream decodable code of near-linear length. Our constructions use locally decodable codes with additional functionality in the decoding, and (for the result on linear functions) repeated tensoring. Our lower bound, which rather surprisingly demonstrates a strong information-theoretic limitation originating from a computational restriction, proceeds via careful control of the message indices that may be output during successive blocks of the stream, a task complicated by the arbitrary state of the decoder during the algorithm.
Cite as

Meghal Gupta, Venkatesan Guruswami, and Mihir Singhal. Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 13:1-13:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13,
  author =	{Gupta, Meghal and Guruswami, Venkatesan and Singhal, Mihir},
  title =	{{Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237072},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coding theory, Streaming computation, Locally decodable code, Lower Bounds}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23
On the Instance Optimality of Detecting Collisions and Subgraphs

Authors: Omri Ben-Eliezer, Tomer Grossman, and Moni Naor

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
Suppose you are given a function f: [n] → [n] via (black-box) query access to the function. You are looking to find something local, like a collision (a pair x ≠ y s.t. f(x) = f(y)). The question is whether knowing the "shape" of the function helps you or not (by shape we mean that some permutation of the function is known). Formally, we investigate the unlabeled instance optimality of substructure detection problems in graphs and functions. A problem is g(n)-instance optimal if it admits an algorithm A satisfying that for any possible input, the (randomized) query complexity of A is at most g(n) times larger than the query complexity of any algorithm A' which solves the same problem while holding an unlabeled copy of the input (i.e., any A' that "knows the structure of the input"). Our results point to a trichotomy of unlabeled instance optimality among substructure detection problems in graphs and functions: - A few very simple properties have an O(1)-instance optimal algorithm. - Most properties of graphs and functions, with examples such as containing a fixed point or a 3-collision in functions, or a triangle in graphs, are n^{c}-far from instance optimal for some constant c > 0. - The problems of collision detection in functions and finding a claw in a graph serve as a middle ground between the two regimes. We show that these two properties are not Ω(log n)-instance optimal, and conjecture that this bound is tight. We provide evidence towards this conjecture, by proving that finding a claw in a graph is O(log(n))-instance optimal among all input graphs for which the query complexity of an algorithm holding an unlabeled certificate is O(√{n/(log n)}).
Cite as

Omri Ben-Eliezer, Tomer Grossman, and Moni Naor. On the Instance Optimality of Detecting Collisions and Subgraphs. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 23:1-23:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beneliezer_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23,
  author =	{Ben-Eliezer, Omri and Grossman, Tomer and Naor, Moni},
  title =	{{On the Instance Optimality of Detecting Collisions and Subgraphs}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234002},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: instance optimality, instance complexity, unlabeled certificate, subgraph detection, collision detection}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77
Minimizing Recourse in an Adaptive Balls and Bins Game

Authors: Adi Fine, Haim Kaplan, and Uri Stemmer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We consider a simple load-balancing game between an algorithm and an adaptive adversary. In a simplified version of this game, the adversary observes the assignment of jobs to machines and selects a machine to kill. The algorithm must then restart the jobs from the failed machine on other machines. The adversary repeats this process, observing the new assignment and eliminating another machine, and so on. The adversary aims to force the algorithm to perform many restarts, while we seek a robust algorithm that minimizes restarts regardless of the adversary’s strategy. This game was recently introduced by Bhattacharya et al. for designing a 3-spanner with low recourse against an adaptive adversary. We prove that a simple algorithm, which assigns each job to a randomly chosen live bin, incurs O(n log n) recourse against an adaptive adversary. This enables us to construct a much simpler 3-spanner with a recourse that is smaller by a factor of O(log² n) compared to the previous construction, without increasing the update time or the size of the spanner. This motivates a careful examination of the range of attacks an adaptive adversary can deploy against simple algorithms before resorting to more complex ones. As our case study demonstrates, this attack space may not be as large as it initially appears, enabling the development of robust algorithms that are both simpler and easier to analyze.
Cite as

Adi Fine, Haim Kaplan, and Uri Stemmer. Minimizing Recourse in an Adaptive Balls and Bins Game. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 77:1-77:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fine_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77,
  author =	{Fine, Adi and Kaplan, Haim and Stemmer, Uri},
  title =	{{Minimizing Recourse in an Adaptive Balls and Bins Game}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{77:1--77:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234544},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77},
  annote =	{Keywords: Adaptive adversary, load-balancing game, balls-and-bins, randomized algorithms, dynamic 3-spanner, dynamic graph algorithms, adversarial robustness}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.106
Streaming Maximal Matching with Bounded Deletions

Authors: Sanjeev Khanna, Christian Konrad, and Jacques Dark

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We initiate the study of the Maximal Matching problem in bounded-deletion graph streams. In this setting, a graph G is revealed as an arbitrary sequence of edge insertions and deletions, where the number of insertions is unrestricted but the number of deletions is guaranteed to be at most K, for some given parameter K. The single-pass streaming space complexity of this problem is known to be Θ(n²) when K is unrestricted, where n is the number of vertices of the input graph. In this work, we present new randomized and deterministic algorithms and matching lower bound results that together give a tight understanding (up to poly-log factors) of how the space complexity of Maximal Matching evolves as a function of the parameter K: The randomized space complexity of this problem is Θ̃(n ⋅ √K), while the deterministic space complexity is Θ̃(n ⋅ K). We further show that if we relax the maximal matching requirement to an α-approximation to Maximum Matching, for any constant α > 2, then the space complexity for both, deterministic and randomized algorithms, strikingly changes to Θ̃(n + K). A key conceptual contribution of our work that underlies all our algorithmic results is the introduction of the hierarchical maximal matching data structure, which computes a hierarchy of L maximal matchings on the substream of edge insertions, for an integer L. This deterministic data structure allows recovering a Maximal Matching even in the presence of up to L-1 edge deletions, which immediately yields an optimal deterministic algorithm with space Õ(n ⋅ K). To reduce the space to Õ(n ⋅ √K), we compute only √K levels of our hierarchical matching data structure and utilize a randomized linear sketch, i.e., our matching repair data structure, to repair any damage due to edge deletions. Using our repair data structure, we show that the level that is least affected by deletions can be repaired back to be globally maximal. The repair data structure is computed independently of the hierarchical maximal matching data structure and stores information for vertices at different scales with a gradually smaller set of vertices storing more and more information about their incident edges. The repair process then makes progress either by rematching a vertex to a previously unmatched vertex, or by strategically matching it to another matched vertex whose current mate is in a better position to find a new mate in that we have stored more information about its incident edges. Our lower bound result for randomized algorithms is obtained by establishing a lower bound for a generalization of the well-known Augmented-Index problem in the one-way two-party communication setting that we refer to as Embedded-Augmented-Index, and then showing that an instance of Embedded-Augmented-Index reduces to computing a maximal matching in bounded-deletion streams. To obtain our lower bound for deterministic algorithms, we utilize a compression argument to show that a deterministic algorithm with space o(n ⋅ K) would yield a scheme to compress a suitable class of graphs below the information-theoretic threshold.
Cite as

Sanjeev Khanna, Christian Konrad, and Jacques Dark. Streaming Maximal Matching with Bounded Deletions. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 106:1-106:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{khanna_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.106,
  author =	{Khanna, Sanjeev and Konrad, Christian and Dark, Jacques},
  title =	{{Streaming Maximal Matching with Bounded Deletions}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{106:1--106:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.106},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234834},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.106},
  annote =	{Keywords: Streaming Algorithms, Maximal Matching, Maximum Matching, Bounded-Deletion Streams}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2
Let’s Try to Be More Tolerant: On Tolerant Property Testing and Distance Approximation (Invited Talk)

Authors: Dana Ron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
This short paper accompanies an invited talk given at ICALP2025. It is an informal, high-level presentation of tolerant testing and distance approximation. It includes some general results as well as a few specific ones, with the aim of providing a taste of this research direction within the area of sublinear algorithms.
Cite as

Dana Ron. Let’s Try to Be More Tolerant: On Tolerant Property Testing and Distance Approximation (Invited Talk). In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 2:1-2:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ron:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2,
  author =	{Ron, Dana},
  title =	{{Let’s Try to Be More Tolerant: On Tolerant Property Testing and Distance Approximation}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233798},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sublinear Algorithms, Tolerant Property Testing, Distance Approximation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.94
New Direct Sum Tests

Authors: Alek Westover, Edward Yu, and Kai Zhe Zheng

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
A function f:[n]^{d} → 𝔽₂ is a direct sum if there are functions L_i:[n] → 𝔽₂ such that f(x) = ∑_i L_i(x_i). In this work we give multiple results related to the property testing of direct sums. Our first result concerns a test proposed by Dinur and Golubev in [Dinur and Golubev, 2019]. We call their test the Diamond test and show that it is indeed a direct sum tester. More specifically, we show that if a function f is ε-far from being a direct sum function, then the Diamond test rejects f with probability at least Ω_{n,ε}(1). Even in the case of n = 2, the Diamond test is, to the best of our knowledge, novel and yields a new tester for the classic property of affinity. Apart from the Diamond test, we also analyze a broad family of direct sum tests, which at a high level, run an arbitrary affinity test on the restriction of f to a random hypercube inside of [n]^d. This family of tests includes the direct sum test analyzed in [Dinur and Golubev, 2019], but does not include the Diamond test. As an application of our result, we obtain a direct sum test which works in the online adversary model of [Iden Kalemaj et al., 2022]. Finally, we also discuss a Fourier analytic interpretation of the diamond tester in the n = 2 case, as well as prove local correction results for direct sum as conjectured by [Dinur and Golubev, 2019].
Cite as

Alek Westover, Edward Yu, and Kai Zhe Zheng. New Direct Sum Tests. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 94:1-94:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{westover_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.94,
  author =	{Westover, Alek and Yu, Edward and Zheng, Kai Zhe},
  title =	{{New Direct Sum Tests}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{94:1--94:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.94},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227229},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.94},
  annote =	{Keywords: Linearity testing, Direct sum, Grids}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.59
Error Correction for Message Streams

Authors: Meghal Gupta and Rachel Yun Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
In the setting of error correcting codes, Alice wants to send a message x ∈ {0,1}ⁿ to Bob via an encoding enc(x) that is resilient to error. In this work, we investigate the scenario where Bob is a low space decoder. More precisely, he receives Alice’s encoding enc(x) bit-by-bit and desires to compute some function f(x) in low space. A generic error-correcting code does not accomplish this because decoding is a very global process and requires at least linear space. Locally decodable codes partially solve this problem as they allow Bob to learn a given bit of x in low space, but not compute a generic function f. Our main result is an encoding and decoding procedure where Bob is still able to compute any such function f in low space when a constant fraction of the stream is corrupted. More precisely, we describe an encoding function enc(x) of length poly(n) so that for any decoder (streaming algorithm) A that on input x computes f(x) in space s, there is an explicit decoder B that computes f(x) in space s ⋅ polylog(n) as long as there were not more than 1/4 - ε fraction of (adversarial) errors in the input stream enc(x).
Cite as

Meghal Gupta and Rachel Yun Zhang. Error Correction for Message Streams. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 59:1-59:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.59,
  author =	{Gupta, Meghal and Zhang, Rachel Yun},
  title =	{{Error Correction for Message Streams}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{59:1--59:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.59},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226875},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.59},
  annote =	{Keywords: error-correcting codes, streaming algorithms, space-efficient algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65
Online Versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing

Authors: Esty Kelman, Ephraim Linder, and Sofya Raskhodnikova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We study property testing with incomplete or noisy inputs. The models we consider allow for adversarial manipulation of the input, but differ in whether the manipulation can be done only offline, i.e., before the execution of the algorithm, or online, i.e., as the algorithm runs. The manipulations by an adversary can come in the form of erasures or corruptions. We compare the query complexity and the randomness complexity of property testing in the offline and online models. Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (Theory Comput. `23) provide properties that can be tested with a small number of queries with offline erasures, but cannot be tested at all with online erasures. We demonstrate that the two models are incomparable in terms of query complexity: we construct properties that can be tested with a constant number of queries in the online corruption model, but require querying a significant fraction of the input in the offline erasure model. We also construct properties that exhibit a strong separation between the randomness complexity of testing in the presence of offline and online adversaries: testing these properties in the online model requires exponentially more random bits than in the offline model, even when they are tested with nearly the same number of queries in both models. Our randomness separation relies on a novel reduction from randomness-efficient testers in the adversarial online model to query-efficient testers in the standard model.
Cite as

Esty Kelman, Ephraim Linder, and Sofya Raskhodnikova. Online Versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 65:1-65:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kelman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65,
  author =	{Kelman, Esty and Linder, Ephraim and Raskhodnikova, Sofya},
  title =	{{Online Versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{65:1--65:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226933},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65},
  annote =	{Keywords: Property Testing, Online Adversary, Offline Adversary, Query Complexity, Randomness Complexity, Separations}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.11
Property Testing with Online Adversaries

Authors: Omri Ben-Eliezer, Esty Kelman, Uri Meir, and Sofya Raskhodnikova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 287, 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)

Abstract
The online manipulation-resilient testing model, proposed by Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova and Varma (ITCS 2022 and Theory of Computing 2023), studies property testing in situations where access to the input degrades continuously and adversarially. Specifically, after each query made by the tester is answered, the adversary can intervene and either erase or corrupt t data points. In this work, we investigate a more nuanced version of the online model in order to overcome old and new impossibility results for the original model. We start by presenting an optimal tester for linearity and a lower bound for low-degree testing of Boolean functions in the original model. We overcome the lower bound by allowing batch queries, where the tester gets a group of queries answered between manipulations of the data. Our batch size is small enough so that function values for a single batch on their own give no information about whether the function is of low degree. Finally, to overcome the impossibility results of Kalemaj et al. for sortedness and the Lipschitz property of sequences, we extend the model to include t < 1, i.e., adversaries that make less than one erasure per query. For sortedness, we characterize the rate of erasures for which online testing can be performed, exhibiting a sharp transition from optimal query complexity to impossibility of testability (with any number of queries). Our online tester works for a general class of local properties of sequences. One feature of our results is that we get new (and in some cases, simpler) optimal algorithms for several properties in the standard property testing model.
Cite as

Omri Ben-Eliezer, Esty Kelman, Uri Meir, and Sofya Raskhodnikova. Property Testing with Online Adversaries. In 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 287, pp. 11:1-11:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beneliezer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.11,
  author =	{Ben-Eliezer, Omri and Kelman, Esty and Meir, Uri and Raskhodnikova, Sofya},
  title =	{{Property Testing with Online Adversaries}},
  booktitle =	{15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-309-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{287},
  editor =	{Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-195395},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Linearity testing, low-degree testing, Reed-Muller codes, testing properties of sequences, erasure-resilience, corruption-resilience}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.15
Is This Correct? Let’s Check!

Authors: Omri Ben-Eliezer, Dan Mikulincer, Elchanan Mossel, and Madhu Sudan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 251, 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)

Abstract
Societal accumulation of knowledge is a complex process. The correctness of new units of knowledge depends not only on the correctness of new reasoning, but also on the correctness of old units that the new one builds on. The errors in such accumulation processes are often remedied by error correction and detection heuristics. Motivating examples include the scientific process based on scientific publications, and software development based on libraries of code. Natural processes that aim to keep errors under control, such as peer review in scientific publications, and testing and debugging in software development, would typically check existing pieces of knowledge - both for the reasoning that generated them and the previous facts they rely on. In this work, we present a simple process that models such accumulation of knowledge and study the persistence (or lack thereof) of errors. We consider a simple probabilistic model for the generation of new units of knowledge based on the preferential attachment growth model, which additionally allows for errors. Furthermore, the process includes checks aimed at catching these errors. We investigate when effects of errors persist forever in the system (with positive probability) and when they get rooted out completely by the checking process. The two basic parameters associated with the checking process are the probability of conducting a check and the depth of the check. We show that errors are rooted out if checks are sufficiently frequent and sufficiently deep. In contrast, shallow or infrequent checks are insufficient to root out errors.
Cite as

Omri Ben-Eliezer, Dan Mikulincer, Elchanan Mossel, and Madhu Sudan. Is This Correct? Let’s Check!. In 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 251, pp. 15:1-15:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beneliezer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.15,
  author =	{Ben-Eliezer, Omri and Mikulincer, Dan and Mossel, Elchanan and Sudan, Madhu},
  title =	{{Is This Correct? Let’s Check!}},
  booktitle =	{14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:11},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-263-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{251},
  editor =	{Tauman Kalai, Yael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-175180},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Error Propagation, Preferential Attachment}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 23 Document/PDF
  • 13 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 10 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 2 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 11 Ben-Eliezer, Omri
  • 3 Fischer, Eldar
  • 2 Gupta, Meghal
  • 2 Kelman, Esty
  • 2 Levi, Amit
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 23 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 11 Theory of computation → Streaming, sublinear and near linear time algorithms
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Coding theory
  • 2 Theory of computation → Computational complexity and cryptography
  • 2 Theory of computation → Error-correcting codes
  • 2 Theory of computation → Streaming models
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Property Testing
  • 3 Property testing
  • 2 Coding theory
  • 2 Linearity testing
  • 2 Sublinear algorithms
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact