73 Search Results for "Geuvers, Herman"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 131

4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019)

FSCD 2019, June 24-30, 2019, Dortmund, Germany

Editors: Herman Geuvers

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 97

22nd International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2016)

TYPES 2016, May 23-26, 2016, Novi Sad, Serbia

Editors: Silvia Ghilezan, Herman Geuvers, and Jelena Ivetic

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3
A Formal Proof of Complexity Bounds on Diophantine Equations

Authors: Jonas Bayer and Marco David

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We present a universal construction of Diophantine equations with bounded complexity in Isabelle/HOL. This is a formalization of our own work in number theory [Jonas Bayer et al., 2025]. Hilbert’s Tenth Problem was answered negatively by Yuri Matiyasevich, who showed that there is no general algorithm to decide whether an arbitrary Diophantine equation has a solution. However, the problem remains open when generalized to the field of rational numbers, or contrarily, when restricted to Diophantine equations with bounded complexity, characterized by the number of variables ν and the degree δ. If every Diophantine set can be represented within the bounds (ν, δ), we say that this pair is universal, and it follows that the corresponding class of equations is undecidable. In a separate mathematics article, we have determined the first non-trivial universal pair for the case of integer unknowns. In this paper, we contribute a formal verification of this new result. In doing so, we markedly extend the Isabelle AFP entry on multivariate polynomials [Christian Sternagel et al., 2010], formalize parts of a number theory textbook [Melvyn B. Nathanson, 1996], and develop classical theory on Diophantine equations [Yuri Matiyasevich and Julia Robinson, 1975] in Isabelle. In addition, our work includes metaprogramming infrastructure designed to efficiently handle complex definitions of multivariate polynomials. Our mathematical draft has been formalized while the mathematical research was ongoing, and benefited largely from the help of the theorem prover. We reflect on how the close collaboration between mathematician and computer is an uncommon but promising modus operandi.
Cite as

Jonas Bayer and Marco David. A Formal Proof of Complexity Bounds on Diophantine Equations. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bayer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3,
  author =	{Bayer, Jonas and David, Marco},
  title =	{{A Formal Proof of Complexity Bounds on Diophantine Equations}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246023},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Diophantine Equations, Hilbert’s Tenth Problem, Isabelle/HOL}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33
Scott’s Representation Theorem and the Univalent Karoubi Envelope

Authors: Arnoud van der Leer, Kobe Wullaert, and Benedikt Ahrens

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Lambek and Scott constructed a correspondence between simply-typed lambda calculi and Cartesian closed categories. Scott’s Representation Theorem is a cousin to this result for untyped lambda calculi. It states that every untyped lambda calculus arises from a reflexive object in some category. We present a formalization of Scott’s Representation Theorem in univalent foundations, in the (Rocq-)UniMath library. Specifically, we implement two proofs of that theorem, one by Scott and one by Hyland. We also explain the role of the Karoubi envelope - a categorical construction - in the proofs and the impact the chosen foundation has on this construction. Finally, we report on some automation we have implemented for the reduction of λ-terms.
Cite as

Arnoud van der Leer, Kobe Wullaert, and Benedikt Ahrens. Scott’s Representation Theorem and the Univalent Karoubi Envelope. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 33:1-33:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vanderleer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33,
  author =	{van der Leer, Arnoud and Wullaert, Kobe and Ahrens, Benedikt},
  title =	{{Scott’s Representation Theorem and the Univalent Karoubi Envelope}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246318},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculi, algebraic theories, categorical semantics, Karoubi envelope, formalization, Rocq-UniMath, univalent foundations}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.24
Formally Verifying a Vertical Cell Decomposition Algorithm

Authors: Yves Bertot and Thomas Portet

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
The broad context of this work is the application of formal methods to geometry and robotics. We describe an algorithm to decompose a working area containing obstacles into a collection of safe cells and the formal proof that this algorithm is correct. We expect such an algorithm will be useful to compute safe trajectories. To our knowledge, this is one of the first formalization of such an algorithm to decompose a working space into elementary cells that are suitable for later applications, with the proof of correctness that guarantees that large parts of the working space are safe. Techniques to perform this proof go from algebraic reasoning on coordinates and determinants to sorting. The main difficulty comes from the possible existence of degenerate cases, which are treated in a principled way.
Cite as

Yves Bertot and Thomas Portet. Formally Verifying a Vertical Cell Decomposition Algorithm. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 24:1-24:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bertot_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.24,
  author =	{Bertot, Yves and Portet, Thomas},
  title =	{{Formally Verifying a Vertical Cell Decomposition Algorithm}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246222},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal Verification, Motion planning, algorithmic geometry}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13
Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized

Authors: Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Barendregt’s book on the untyped λ-calculus refines the inconsistent view of β-divergence as representation of the undefined via the key concept of head reduction. In this paper, we put together recent revisitations of some key theorems laid out in Barendregt’s book, and we formalize them in the Abella proof assistant. Our work provides a compact and refreshed presentation of the core of the book. The formalization faithfully mimics pen-and-paper proofs. Two interesting aspects are the manipulation of contexts for the study of contextual equivalence and a formal alternative to the informal trick at work in Takahashi’s proof of the genericity lemma. As a by-product, we obtain an alternative definition of contextual equivalence that does not mention contexts.
Cite as

Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs. Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 13:1-13:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lancelot_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13,
  author =	{Lancelot, Adrienne and Accattoli, Beniamino and Vemclefs, Maxime},
  title =	{{Barendregt’s Theory of the \lambda-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246114},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, head reduction, equational theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.34
New Fault Domains for Conformance Testing of Finite State Machines

Authors: Frits Vaandrager and Ivo Melse

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
A fault domain reflects a tester’s assumptions about faults that may occur in an implementation and that need to be detected during testing. A fault domain that has been widely studied in the literature on black-box conformance testing is the class of finite state machines (FSMs) with at most m states. Numerous strategies for generating test suites have been proposed that guarantee fault coverage for this class. These so-called m-complete test suites grow exponentially in m-n, where n is the number of states of the specification, so one can only run them for small values of m-n. But the assumption that m-n is small is not realistic in practice. In his seminal paper from 1964, Hennie raised the challenge to design checking experiments in which the number of states may increase appreciably. In order to solve this long-standing open problem, we propose (much larger) fault domains that capture the assumption that all states in an implementation can be reached by first performing a sequence from some set A (typically a state cover for the specification), followed by k arbitrary inputs, for some small k. The number of states of FSMs in these fault domains grows exponentially in k. We present a sufficient condition for k-A-completeness of test suites with respect to these fault domains. Our condition implies k-A-completeness of two prominent m-complete test suite generation strategies, the Wp and HSI methods. Thus these strategies are complete for much larger fault domains than those for which they were originally designed, and thereby solve Hennie’s challenge. We show that three other prominent m-complete methods (H, SPY and SPYH) do not always generate k-A-complete test suites.
Cite as

Frits Vaandrager and Ivo Melse. New Fault Domains for Conformance Testing of Finite State Machines. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 34:1-34:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vaandrager_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.34,
  author =	{Vaandrager, Frits and Melse, Ivo},
  title =	{{New Fault Domains for Conformance Testing of Finite State Machines}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239843},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: conformance testing, finite state machines, Mealy machines, apartness, observation tree, fault domains, k-A-complete test suites}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.33
Solving Guarded Domain Equations in Presheaves over Ordinals and Mechanizing It

Authors: Sergei Stepanenko and Amin Timany

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
Constructing solutions to recursive domain equations is a well-known, important problem in the study of programs and programming languages. Mathematically speaking, the problem is finding a fixed point (up to isomorphism) of a suitable functor over a suitable category. A particularly useful instance, inspired by the step-indexing technique, is where the functor is over (a subcategory of) the category of presheaves over the ordinal ω and the functors are locally-contractive, also known as guarded functors. This corresponds to step-indexing over natural numbers. However, for certain problems, e.g., when dealing with infinite non-determinism, one needs to employ trans-finite step-indexing, i.e., consider presheaf categories over higher ordinals. Prior work on trans-finite step-indexing either only considers a very narrow class of functors over a particularly restricted subcategory of presheaves over higher ordinals, or treats the problem very generally working with sheaves over an arbitrary complete Heyting algebra with a well-founded basis. In this paper we present a solution to the guarded domain equations problem over all guarded functors over the category of presheaves over ordinal numbers, as well as its mechanization in the Rocq Prover. As the categories of sheaves and presheaves over ordinals are equivalent, our main contribution is simplifying prior work from the setting of the category of sheaves to the setting of the category of presheaves and mechanizing it - presheaves are more amenable to mechanization in a proof assistant.
Cite as

Sergei Stepanenko and Amin Timany. Solving Guarded Domain Equations in Presheaves over Ordinals and Mechanizing It. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 33:1-33:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{stepanenko_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.33,
  author =	{Stepanenko, Sergei and Timany, Amin},
  title =	{{Solving Guarded Domain Equations in Presheaves over Ordinals and Mechanizing It}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236486},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Domain Equations, Guarded Fixed Points, Fixed Points, Category Theory, Rocq, Presheaves, Ordinals}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27
What Does It Take to Certify a Conversion Checker?

Authors: Meven Lennon-Bertrand

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We report on a detailed exploration of the properties of conversion (definitional equality) in dependent type theory, with the goal of certifying decision procedures for it. While in that context the property of normalisation has attracted the most light, we instead emphasize the importance of injectivity properties, showing that they alone are both crucial and sufficient to certify most desirable properties of conversion checkers. We also explore the certification of a fully untyped conversion checker, with respect to a typed specification, and show that the story is mostly unchanged, although the exact injectivity properties needed are subtly different.
Cite as

Meven Lennon-Bertrand. What Does It Take to Certify a Conversion Checker?. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 27:1-27:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lennonbertrand:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27,
  author =	{Lennon-Bertrand, Meven},
  title =	{{What Does It Take to Certify a Conversion Checker?}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236428},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dependent types, Bidirectional typing, Certified software}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.11
Impredicative Encodings of Inductive and Coinductive Types

Authors: Steven Bronsveld, Herman Geuvers, and Niels van der Weide

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
In impredicative type theory (System F, also known as λ2), it is possible to define inductive data types, such as natural numbers and lists. It is also possible to define coinductive data types such as streams. They work well in the sense that their (co)recursion principles obey the expected computation rules (the β-rules). Unfortunately, they do not yield a (co)induction principle [Herman Geuvers, 2001; Ivar Rummelhoff, 2004], because the necessary uniqueness principles are missing (the η-rules). Awodey, Frey, and Speight [Steve Awodey et al., 2018] used an extension of the Calculus of Constructions [Thierry Coquand and Gérard P. Huet, 1988] (λ C) with Σ-types, identity-types, and functional extensionality to define System F style inductive types with an induction principle, by encoding them as a well-chosen subtype, making them initial algebras. In this paper, we extend their results to coinductive data types, and we detail the example of the stream data type with the desired coinduction principle (also called bisimulation). To do that, we first define quotient types (with the desired η-rules) and we also need a stronger form of the definable existential types. We also show that we can use the original method by Awodey, Frey and Speight for general inductive types by defining W-types with an induction principle. The dual approach for streams can be extended to M-types, the generic notion of coinductive types, and the dual of W-types.
Cite as

Steven Bronsveld, Herman Geuvers, and Niels van der Weide. Impredicative Encodings of Inductive and Coinductive Types. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 11:1-11:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bronsveld_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.11,
  author =	{Bronsveld, Steven and Geuvers, Herman and van der Weide, Niels},
  title =	{{Impredicative Encodings of Inductive and Coinductive Types}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236263},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formulas-as-types, impredicativity, inductive types, coinductive types}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4
Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively

Authors: Adrienne Lancelot

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 336, 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)

Abstract
Intersection type systems, as adequate models of the λ-calculus, induce an equational theory on terms, that we refer to as type equivalence. We give a new proof technique to coinductively characterize type equivalence. To do so, we explore a simple setting, namely weak head type equivalence, which is the equational theory induced by a weak head non-idempotent intersection type system. We prove a folklore result: weak head type equivalence coincides with Sangiorgi’s normal form bisimilarity. What is new in our development is that we only rely on coinductive program equivalences, bypassing the need to introduce term approximants, which were used in previous works characterizing type equivalence. The crucial part of this characterization is to show that type equivalent terms are normal form bisimilar: we do so by constructing shape typings that can only type terms of a specific normal form structure. Shape typings are a light form of principal types, a technique often used in intersection types to generate from one or few principal typing all possible typings of a term.
Cite as

Adrienne Lancelot. Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively. In 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 336, pp. 4:1-4:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lancelot:LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4,
  author =	{Lancelot, Adrienne},
  title =	{{Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-376-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{336},
  editor =	{M{\o}gelberg, Rasmus Ejlers and van den Berg, Benno},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233660},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda calculus, intersection types, program equivalence}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.5
Implementing a Type Theory with Observational Equality, Using Normalisation by Evaluation

Authors: Matthew Sirman, Meven Lennon-Bertrand, and Neel Krishnaswami

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 336, 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)

Abstract
We report on an experimental implementation in Haskell of a dependent type theory featuring an observational equality type, based on Pujet et al.’s CCobs. We use normalisation by evaluation to produce an efficient normalisation function, which is used to implement a bidirectional type checker. To allow for greater expressivity, we extend the core CCobs calculus with quotient types and inductive types. To make the system usable, we explore various proof-assistant features, notably a rudimentary version of a "hole" system similar to Agda’s. While rather crude, this experience should inform other, more substantial implementation efforts of observational equality.
Cite as

Matthew Sirman, Meven Lennon-Bertrand, and Neel Krishnaswami. Implementing a Type Theory with Observational Equality, Using Normalisation by Evaluation. In 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 336, pp. 5:1-5:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sirman_et_al:LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.5,
  author =	{Sirman, Matthew and Lennon-Bertrand, Meven and Krishnaswami, Neel},
  title =	{{Implementing a Type Theory with Observational Equality, Using Normalisation by Evaluation}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-376-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{336},
  editor =	{M{\o}gelberg, Rasmus Ejlers and van den Berg, Benno},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233673},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dependent type theory, Bidirectional typing, Observational equality, Normalisation by evaluation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23
How to Play the Accordion: Uniformity and the (Non-)Conservativity of the Linear Approximation of the λ-Calculus

Authors: Rémy Cerda and Lionel Vaux Auclair

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
Twenty years after its introduction by Ehrhard and Regnier, differentiation in λ-calculus and in linear logic is now a celebrated tool. In particular, it allows to write the Taylor formula in various λ-calculi, hence providing a theory of linear approximations for these calculi. In the standard λ-calculus, this linear approximation is expressed by results stating that the (possibly) infinitary β-reduction of λ-terms is simulated by the reduction of their Taylor expansion: in terms of rewriting systems, the resource reduction (operating on Taylor approximants) is an extension of the β-reduction. In this paper, we address the converse property, conservativity: are there reductions of the Taylor approximants that do not arise from an actual β-reduction of the approximated term? We show that if we restrict the setting to finite terms and β-reduction sequences, then the linear approximation is conservative. However, as soon as one allows infinitary reduction sequences this property is broken. We design a counter-example, the Accordion. Then we show how restricting the reduction of the Taylor approximants allows to build a conservative extension of the β-reduction preserving good simulation properties. This restriction relies on uniformity, a property that was already at the core of Ehrhard and Regnier’s pioneering work.
Cite as

Rémy Cerda and Lionel Vaux Auclair. How to Play the Accordion: Uniformity and the (Non-)Conservativity of the Linear Approximation of the λ-Calculus. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 23:1-23:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cerda_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23,
  author =	{Cerda, R\'{e}my and Vaux Auclair, Lionel},
  title =	{{How to Play the Accordion: Uniformity and the (Non-)Conservativity of the Linear Approximation of the \lambda-Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228480},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: program approximation, quantitative semantics, lambda-calculus, linear approximation, Taylor expansion, conservativity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47
A Rewriting Theory for Quantum λ-Calculus

Authors: Claudia Faggian, Gaetan Lopez, and Benoît Valiron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
Quantum lambda calculus has been studied mainly as an idealized programming language - the evaluation essentially corresponds to a deterministic abstract machine. Very little work has been done to develop a rewriting theory for quantum lambda calculus. Recent advances in the theory of probabilistic rewriting give us a way to tackle this task with tools unavailable a decade ago. Our primary focus are standardization and normalization results.
Cite as

Claudia Faggian, Gaetan Lopez, and Benoît Valiron. A Rewriting Theory for Quantum λ-Calculus. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 47:1-47:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{faggian_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47,
  author =	{Faggian, Claudia and Lopez, Gaetan and Valiron, Beno\^{i}t},
  title =	{{A Rewriting Theory for Quantum \lambda-Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{47:1--47:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228046},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum lambda-calculus, probabilistic rewriting, operational semantics, asymptotic normalization, principles of quantum programming languages}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.28
Strong Induction Is an Up-To Technique

Authors: Filippo Bonchi, Elena Di Lavore, and Anna Ricci

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
Up-to techniques are enhancements of the coinduction proof principle which, in lattice theoretic terms, is the dual of induction. What is the dual of coinduction up-to? By means of duality, we illustrate a theory of induction up-to and we observe that an elementary proof technique, commonly known as strong induction, is an instance of induction up-to. We also show that, when generalising our theory from lattices to categories, one obtains an enhancement of the induction definition principle known in the literature as comonadic recursion.
Cite as

Filippo Bonchi, Elena Di Lavore, and Anna Ricci. Strong Induction Is an Up-To Technique. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 28:1-28:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bonchi_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.28,
  author =	{Bonchi, Filippo and Di Lavore, Elena and Ricci, Anna},
  title =	{{Strong Induction Is an Up-To Technique}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227856},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: Induction, Coinduction, Up-to Techniques, Induction up-to, Lattices, Algebras}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 71 Document/PDF
  • 11 Document/HTML
  • 2 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 13 2025
  • 3 2023
  • 1 2021
  • 38 2019
  • 18 2018

  • Refine by Author
  • 7 Geuvers, Herman
  • 4 van der Weide, Niels
  • 3 Ahrens, Benedikt
  • 3 Coquand, Thierry
  • 2 Accattoli, Beniamino
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 71 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 22 Theory of computation → Type theory
  • 10 Theory of computation → Lambda calculus
  • 10 Theory of computation → Proof theory
  • 7 Theory of computation → Linear logic
  • 7 Theory of computation → Rewrite systems
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 type theory
  • 4 Coq
  • 4 canonicity
  • 4 intersection types
  • 3 dependent type theory
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact