11 Search Results for "Mastrolilli, Monaldo"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.10
Bounding the Makespan of Transaction Schedules

Authors: Tim Baccaert, Brecht Vandevoort, and Bas Ketsman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 365, 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)

Abstract
The performance of transactional database systems is typically evaluated by measuring the amount of transactions they can commit to the database per second. However, fairly measuring this for the same workload on different systems is not trivial. It is therefore relevant to formalize schedule efficiency, investigate the space of all possible efficient schedules, and identify whether there is any room for improvement. Prior transaction theory largely centers on decision problems relating to safety, such as the serializability, robustness, and allocation problems. Most pertinently, these problems take already scheduled transactions as input, and do not directly consider the efficiency of those schedules. In this work, we define schedules as assignments of operations on objects to discrete points in time. This allows us to quantify efficiency as the elapsed duration between the schedule’s beginning and end, more commonly known as the makespan in the scheduling literature. We establish that, given some set of transactions and a desired makespan, it is NP-complete to decide if there exists a conflict serializable schedule which is bounded by that makespan. We additionally provide an instance optimal algorithm for scheduling transaction sets with a single contention point, that is, exactly one object may appear in conflicting operations. Lastly, we give worst-case optimal bounds on the makespan, meaning that schedules can never exceed this bound, and for the worst transaction sets, the bound is optimal.
Cite as

Tim Baccaert, Brecht Vandevoort, and Bas Ketsman. Bounding the Makespan of Transaction Schedules. In 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 365, pp. 10:1-10:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{baccaert_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.10,
  author =	{Baccaert, Tim and Vandevoort, Brecht and Ketsman, Bas},
  title =	{{Bounding the Makespan of Transaction Schedules}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-413-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{365},
  editor =	{ten Cate, Balder and Funk, Maurice},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256242},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Transactions, Scheduling, Discrete Optimization, Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98
Weighted Chairman Assignment and Flow-Time Scheduling

Authors: Siyue Liu and Victor Reis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Given positive integers m, n, a fractional assignment x ∈ [0,1]^{m × n} and weights d ∈ ℝⁿ_{> 0}, we show that there exists an assignment y ∈ {0,1}^{m × n} so that for every i ∈ [m] and t ∈ [n], |∑_{j ∈ [t]} d_j (x_{ij} - y_{ij})| < max_{j ∈ [n]} d_j. This generalizes a result of Tijdeman (1973) on the unweighted version, known as the chairman assignment problem. This also confirms a special case of the single-source unsplittable flow conjecture with arc-wise lower and upper bounds due to Morell and Skutella (IPCO 2020). As an application, we consider a scheduling problem where jobs have release times and machines have closing times, and a job can only be scheduled on a machine if it is released before the machine closes. We give a 3-approximation algorithm for maximum flow-time minimization.
Cite as

Siyue Liu and Victor Reis. Weighted Chairman Assignment and Flow-Time Scheduling. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 98:1-98:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{liu_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98,
  author =	{Liu, Siyue and Reis, Victor},
  title =	{{Weighted Chairman Assignment and Flow-Time Scheduling}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{98:1--98:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253858},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.98},
  annote =	{Keywords: prefix discrepancy, flow-time scheduling, unsplittable flow}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.49
On the Hardness of Order Finding and Equivalence Testing for ROABPs

Authors: C. Ramya and Pratik Shastri

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
The complexity of representing a polynomial by a Read-Once Oblivious Algebraic Branching Program (ROABP) is highly dependent on the chosen variable ordering. Bhargava et al. [Bhargava et al., 2024] prove that finding the optimal ordering is NP-hard, and provide some evidence (based on the Small Set Expansion hypothesis) that it is also hard to approximate the optimal ROABP width. In another work, Baraskar et al. [Baraskar et al., 2024] show that it is NP-hard to test whether a polynomial is in the GL_n orbit of a polynomial of sparsity at most s. Building upon these works, we show the following results: first, we prove that approximating the minimum ROABP width up to any constant factor is NP-hard, when the input is presented as a circuit. This removes the reliance on stronger conjectures in the previous work [Bhargava et al., 2024]. Second, we show that testing if an input polynomial given in the sparse representation is in the affine GL_n orbit of a width-w ROABP is NP-hard. Furthermore, we show that over fields of characteristic 0, the problem is NP-hard even when the input polynomial is homogeneous. This provides the first NP-hardness results for membership testing for a dense subclass of polynomial sized algebraic branching programs (VBP). Finally, we locate the source of hardness for the order finding problem at the lowest possible non-trivial degree, proving that the problem is NP-hard even for quadratic forms.
Cite as

C. Ramya and Pratik Shastri. On the Hardness of Order Finding and Equivalence Testing for ROABPs. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 49:1-49:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ramya_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.49,
  author =	{Ramya, C. and Shastri, Pratik},
  title =	{{On the Hardness of Order Finding and Equivalence Testing for ROABPs}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{49:1--49:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.49},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251296},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.49},
  annote =	{Keywords: ROABP, Order Finding, Equivalence Testing, NP-hardness, Hardness of Approximation}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.19
On the Constant-Factor Approximability of Minimum Cost Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Authors: Ian DeHaan, Neng Huang, and Euiwoong Lee

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We study minimum cost constraint satisfaction problems (MinCostCSP) through the algebraic lens. We show that for any constraint language Γ which has the dual discriminator operation as a polymorphism, there exists a |D|-approximation algorithm for MinCostCSP(Γ) where D is the domain. Complementing our algorithmic result, we show that any constraint language Γ where MinCostCSP(Γ) admits a constant-factor approximation must have a near-unanimity (NU) polymorphism unless P = NP, extending a similar result by Dalmau et al. on MinCSPs. These results imply a dichotomy of constant-factor approximability for constraint languages that contain all permutation relations (a natural generalization for Boolean CSPs that allow variable negation): either MinCostCSP(Γ) has an NU polymorphism and is |D|-approximable, or it does not have any NU polymorphism and is NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor. Finally, we present a constraint language which has a majority polymorphism, but is nonetheless NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, showing that the condition of having an NU polymorphism is in general not sufficient unless UGC fails.
Cite as

Ian DeHaan, Neng Huang, and Euiwoong Lee. On the Constant-Factor Approximability of Minimum Cost Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 19:1-19:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dehaan_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.19,
  author =	{DeHaan, Ian and Huang, Neng and Lee, Euiwoong},
  title =	{{On the Constant-Factor Approximability of Minimum Cost Constraint Satisfaction Problems}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243851},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Constraint satisfaction problems, approximation algorithms, polymorphisms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.22
On Minimizing Wiggle in Stacked Area Charts

Authors: Alexander Dobler and Martin Nöllenburg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 349, 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)

Abstract
Stacked area charts are a widely used visualization technique for numerical time series. The x-axis represents time, and the time series are displayed as horizontal, variable-height layers stacked on top of each other. The height of each layer corresponds to the time series values at each time point. The main aesthetic criterion for optimizing the readability of stacked area charts is the amount of vertical change of the borders between the time series in the visualization, called wiggle. While many heuristic algorithms have been developed to minimize wiggle, the computational complexity of minimizing wiggle has not been formally analyzed. In this paper, we show that different variants of wiggle minimization are NP-hard and even hard to approximate. We also present an exact mixed-integer linear programming formulation and compare its performance with a state-of-the-art heuristic in an experimental evaluation. Lastly, we consider a special case of wiggle minimization that corresponds to the fundamentally interesting and natural problem of ordering a set of numbers as to minimize their sum of absolute prefix sums. We show several complexity results for this problem that imply some of the mentioned hardness results for wiggle minimization.
Cite as

Alexander Dobler and Martin Nöllenburg. On Minimizing Wiggle in Stacked Area Charts. In 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 349, pp. 22:1-22:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dobler_et_al:LIPIcs.WADS.2025.22,
  author =	{Dobler, Alexander and N\"{o}llenburg, Martin},
  title =	{{On Minimizing Wiggle in Stacked Area Charts}},
  booktitle =	{19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-398-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{349},
  editor =	{Morin, Pat and Oh, Eunjin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242530},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stacked area charts, NP-hardness, Mixed-integer linear programming}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.73
Branch-And-Bound Algorithms as Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes

Authors: Koppány István Encz, Monaldo Mastrolilli, and Eleonora Vercesi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
Branch-and-bound algorithms (B&B) and polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS) are two seemingly distant areas of combinatorial optimization. We intend to (partially) bridge the gap between them while expanding the boundary of theoretical knowledge on the B&B framework. Branch-and-bound algorithms typically guarantee that an optimal solution is eventually found. However, we show that the standard implementation of branch-and-bound for certain knapsack and scheduling problems also exhibits PTAS-like behaviour, yielding increasingly better solutions within polynomial time. Our findings are supported by computational experiments and comparisons with benchmark methods.
Cite as

Koppány István Encz, Monaldo Mastrolilli, and Eleonora Vercesi. Branch-And-Bound Algorithms as Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 73:1-73:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{encz_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.73,
  author =	{Encz, Kopp\'{a}ny Istv\'{a}n and Mastrolilli, Monaldo and Vercesi, Eleonora},
  title =	{{Branch-And-Bound Algorithms as Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{73:1--73:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.73},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234502},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.73},
  annote =	{Keywords: Branch-and-bound algorithm, Polynomial-time approximation scheme, Parallel machine scheduling problem, Knapsack problem}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.34
On the Degree Automatability of Sum-Of-Squares Proofs

Authors: Alex Bortolotti, Monaldo Mastrolilli, and Luis Felipe Vargas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
The Sum-of-Squares (SoS) hierarchy, also known as Lasserre hierarchy, has emerged as a promising tool in optimization. However, it remains unclear whether fixed-degree SoS proofs can be automated [O'Donnell (2017)]. Indeed, there are examples of polynomial systems with bounded coefficients that admit low-degree SoS proofs, but these proofs necessarily involve numbers with an exponential number of bits, implying that low-degree SoS proofs cannot always be found efficiently. A sufficient condition derived from the Nullstellensatz proof system [Raghavendra and Weitz (2017)] identifies cases where bit complexity issues can be circumvented. One of the main problems left open by Raghavendra and Weitz is proving any result for refutations, as their condition applies only to polynomial systems with a large set of solutions. In this work, we broaden the class of polynomial systems for which degree-d SoS proofs can be automated. To achieve this, we develop a new criterion and we demonstrate how our criterion applies to polynomial systems beyond the scope of Raghavendra and Weitz’s result. In particular, we establish a separation for instances arising from Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). Moreover, our result extends to refutations, establishing that polynomial-time refutation is possible for broad classes of polynomial time solvable constraint problems, highlighting a first advancement in this area.
Cite as

Alex Bortolotti, Monaldo Mastrolilli, and Luis Felipe Vargas. On the Degree Automatability of Sum-Of-Squares Proofs. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 34:1-34:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bortolotti_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.34,
  author =	{Bortolotti, Alex and Mastrolilli, Monaldo and Vargas, Luis Felipe},
  title =	{{On the Degree Automatability of Sum-Of-Squares Proofs}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234110},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sum of squares, Polynomial calculus, Polynomial ideal membership, Polymorphisms, Gr\"{o}bner basis theory, Constraint satisfaction problems, Proof complexity}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.128
3.415-Approximation for Coflow Scheduling via Iterated Rounding

Authors: Lars Rohwedder and Leander Schnaars

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We provide an algorithm giving a 140/41 (< 3.415)-approximation for Coflow Scheduling and a 4.36-approximation for Coflow Scheduling with release dates. This improves upon the best known 4- and respectively 5-approximations and addresses an open question posed by Agarwal, Rajakrishnan, Narayan, Agarwal, Shmoys, and Vahdat [Agarwal et al., 2018], Fukunaga [Fukunaga, 2022], and others. We additionally show that in an asymptotic setting, the algorithm achieves a (2+ε)-approximation, which is essentially optimal under ℙ ≠ NP. The improvements are achieved using a novel edge allocation scheme using iterated LP rounding together with a framework which enables establishing strong bounds for combinations of several edge allocation algorithms.
Cite as

Lars Rohwedder and Leander Schnaars. 3.415-Approximation for Coflow Scheduling via Iterated Rounding. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 128:1-128:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rohwedder_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.128,
  author =	{Rohwedder, Lars and Schnaars, Leander},
  title =	{{3.415-Approximation for Coflow Scheduling via Iterated Rounding}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{128:1--128:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.128},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235050},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.128},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coflow Scheduling, Approximation Algorithms, Iterated Rounding}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.16
Ideal Membership Problem for Boolean Minority and Dual Discriminator

Authors: Arpitha P. Bharathi and Monaldo Mastrolilli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 202, 46th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2021)

Abstract
The polynomial Ideal Membership Problem (IMP) tests if an input polynomial f ∈ 𝔽[x_1,… ,x_n] with coefficients from a field 𝔽 belongs to a given ideal I ⊆ 𝔽[x_1,… ,x_n]. It is a well-known fundamental problem with many important applications, though notoriously intractable in the general case. In this paper we consider the IMP for polynomial ideals encoding combinatorial problems and where the input polynomial f has degree at most d = O(1) (we call this problem IMP_d). A dichotomy result between "hard" (NP-hard) and "easy" (polynomial time) IMPs was achieved for Constraint Satisfaction Problems over finite domains [Andrei A. Bulatov, 2017; Dmitriy Zhuk, 2020] (this is equivalent to IMP_0) and IMP_d for the Boolean domain [Mastrolilli, 2019], both based on the classification of the IMP through functions called polymorphisms. For the latter result, there are only six polymorphisms to be studied in order to achieve a full dichotomy result for the IMP_d. The complexity of the IMP_d for five of these polymorphisms has been solved in [Mastrolilli, 2019] whereas for the ternary minority polymorphism it was incorrectly declared in [Mastrolilli, 2019] to have been resolved by a previous result. In this paper we provide the missing link by proving that the IMP_d for Boolean combinatorial ideals whose constraints are closed under the minority polymorphism can be solved in polynomial time. This completes the identification of the precise borderline of tractability for the IMP_d for constrained problems over the Boolean domain. We also prove that the proof of membership for the IMP_d for problems constrained by the dual discriminator polymorphism over any finite domain can also be found in polynomial time. Bulatov and Rafiey [Andrei A. Bulatov and Akbar Rafiey, 2020] recently proved that the IMP_d for this polymorphism is decidable in polynomial time, without needing a proof of membership. Our result gives a proof of membership and can be used in applications such as Nullstellensatz and Sum-of-Squares proofs.
Cite as

Arpitha P. Bharathi and Monaldo Mastrolilli. Ideal Membership Problem for Boolean Minority and Dual Discriminator. In 46th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 202, pp. 16:1-16:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bharathi_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.16,
  author =	{Bharathi, Arpitha P. and Mastrolilli, Monaldo},
  title =	{{Ideal Membership Problem for Boolean Minority and Dual Discriminator}},
  booktitle =	{46th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2021)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-201-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{202},
  editor =	{Bonchi, Filippo and Puglisi, Simon J.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-144560},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Polynomial ideal membership, Polymorphisms, Gr\"{o}bner basis theory, Constraint satisfaction problems}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.13
Ideal Membership Problem and a Majority Polymorphism over the Ternary Domain

Authors: Arpitha P. Bharathi and Monaldo Mastrolilli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 170, 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020)

Abstract
The Ideal Membership Problem (IMP) asks if an input polynomial f ∈ 𝔽[x₁,… ,x_n] with coefficients from a field 𝔽 belongs to an input ideal I ⊆ 𝔽[x₁,… ,x_n]. It is a well-known fundamental problem with many important applications, though notoriously intractable in the general case. In this paper we consider the IMP for polynomial ideals encoding combinatorial problems and where the input polynomial f has degree at most d = O(1) (we call this problem IMP_d). Our main interest is in understanding when the inherent combinatorial structure of the ideals makes the IMP_d "hard" (NP-hard) or "easy" (polynomial time) to solve. Such a dichotomy result between "hard" and "easy" IMPs was recently achieved for Constraint Satisfaction Problems over finite domains [Andrei A. Bulatov, 2017; Dmitriy Zhuk, 2017] (this is equivalent to IMP₀) and IMP_d for the Boolean domain [Mastrolilli, 2019], both based on the classification of the IMP through functions called polymorphisms. For the latter result, each polymorphism determined the complexity of the computation of a suitable Gröbner basis. In this paper we consider a 3-element domain and a majority polymorphism (constraints under this polymorphism are a generalisation of the 2-SAT problem). By using properties of the majority polymorphism and assuming graded lexicographic ordering of monomials, we show that the reduced Gröbner basis of ideals whose varieties are closed under the majority polymorphism can be computed in polynomial time. This proves polynomial time solvability of the IMP_d for these constrained problems. We conjecture that this result can be extended to a general finite domain of size k = O(1). This is a first step towards the long term and challenging goal of generalizing the dichotomy results of solvability of the IMP_d for a finite domain.
Cite as

Arpitha P. Bharathi and Monaldo Mastrolilli. Ideal Membership Problem and a Majority Polymorphism over the Ternary Domain. In 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 170, pp. 13:1-13:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bharathi_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.13,
  author =	{Bharathi, Arpitha P. and Mastrolilli, Monaldo},
  title =	{{Ideal Membership Problem and a Majority Polymorphism over the Ternary Domain}},
  booktitle =	{45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-159-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{170},
  editor =	{Esparza, Javier and Kr\'{a}l', Daniel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-126829},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Polynomial ideal membership, Polymorphisms, Gr\"{o}bner basis theory, Constraint satisfaction problems}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.78
Tight Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds for Binary Polynomial Optimization Problems

Authors: Adam Kurpisz, Samuli Leppänen, and Monaldo Mastrolilli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)

Abstract
We give two results concerning the power of the Sum-Of-Squares(SoS)/Lasserre hierarchy. For binary polynomial optimization problems of degree 2d and an odd number of variables n, we prove that (n+2d-1)/2 levels of the SoS/Lasserre hierarchy are necessary to provide the exact optimal value. This matches the recent upper bound result by Sakaue, Takeda, Kim and Ito. Additionally, we study a conjecture by Laurent, who considered the linear representation of a set with no integral points. She showed that the Sherali-Adams hierarchy requires n levels to detect the empty integer hull, and conjectured that the SoS/Lasserre rank for the same problem is n-1. We disprove this conjecture and derive lower and upper bounds for the rank.
Cite as

Adam Kurpisz, Samuli Leppänen, and Monaldo Mastrolilli. Tight Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds for Binary Polynomial Optimization Problems. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 78:1-78:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kurpisz_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.78,
  author =	{Kurpisz, Adam and Lepp\"{a}nen, Samuli and Mastrolilli, Monaldo},
  title =	{{Tight Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds for Binary Polynomial Optimization Problems}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{78:1--78:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.78},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-63368},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.78},
  annote =	{Keywords: SoS/Lasserre hierarchy, lift and project methods, binary polynomial optimization}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 11 Document/PDF
  • 7 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 6 2025
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2016

  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Mastrolilli, Monaldo
  • 2 Bharathi, Arpitha P.
  • 1 Baccaert, Tim
  • 1 Bortolotti, Alex
  • 1 DeHaan, Ian
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 11 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Combinatoric problems
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Gröbner bases and other special bases
  • 2 Theory of computation → Discrete optimization
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Symbolic and algebraic algorithms
  • 1 Information systems → Database transaction processing
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 Constraint satisfaction problems
  • 3 Gröbner basis theory
  • 3 Polymorphisms
  • 3 Polynomial ideal membership
  • 2 NP-hardness
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact