13 Search Results for "Meier, Arne"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.25
Homomorphism Indistinguishability, Multiplicity Automata Equivalence, and Polynomial Identity Testing

Authors: Marek Černý and Tim Seppelt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Two graphs G and H are homomorphism indistinguishable over a graph class ℱ if they admit the same number of homomorphisms from every graph F ∈ ℱ. Many graph isomorphism relaxations such as (quantum) isomorphism and cospectrality can be characterised as homomorphism indistinguishability over specific graph classes. Thereby, the problems HomInd(ℱ) of deciding homomorphism indistinguishability over ℱ subsume diverse graph isomorphism relaxations whose complexities range from logspace to undecidable. Establishing the first general result on the complexity of HomInd(ℱ), Seppelt (MFCS 2024) showed that HomInd(ℱ) is in randomised polynomial time for every graph class ℱ of bounded treewidth that can be defined in counting monadic second-order logic CMSO₂. We show that this algorithm is conditionally optimal, i.e. it cannot be derandomised unless polynomial identity testing is in P. For CMSO₂-definable graph classes ℱ of bounded pathwidth, we improve the previous complexity upper bound for HomInd(ℱ) from P to C_ = L and show that this is tight. Secondarily, we establish a connection between homomorphism indistinguishability and multiplicity automata equivalence which allows us to pinpoint the complexity of the latter problem as C_ = L-complete.
Cite as

Marek Černý and Tim Seppelt. Homomorphism Indistinguishability, Multiplicity Automata Equivalence, and Polynomial Identity Testing. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 25:1-25:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cerny_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.25,
  author =	{\v{C}ern\'{y}, Marek and Seppelt, Tim},
  title =	{{Homomorphism Indistinguishability, Multiplicity Automata Equivalence, and Polynomial Identity Testing}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255144},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: treewidth, Courcelle’s theorem, logspace, multiplicity automata, polynomial identity testing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.10
Disjunctions of Two Dependence Atoms

Authors: Nicolas Fröhlich, Phokion G. Kolaitis, and Arne Meier

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Dependence logic is a formalism that augments the syntax of first-order logic with dependence atoms asserting that the value of a variable is determined by the values of some other variables, i.e., dependence atoms express functional dependencies in relational databases. On finite structures, dependence logic captures NP, hence there are sentences of dependence logic whose model-checking problem is NP-complete. In fact, it is known that there are disjunctions of three dependence atoms whose model-checking problem is NP-complete. Motivated from considerations in database theory, we study the model-checking problem for disjunctions of two unary dependence atoms and establish a trichotomy theorem, namely, for every such formula, one of the following is true for the model-checking problem: (i) it is NL-complete; (ii) it is L-complete; (iii) it is first-order definable (hence, in AC⁰). Furthermore, we classify the complexity of the model-checking problem for disjunctions of two arbitrary dependence atoms, and also characterize when such a disjunction is coherent, i.e., when it satisfies a certain small-model property. Along the way, we identify a new class of 2CNF-formulas whose satisfiability problem is L-complete.
Cite as

Nicolas Fröhlich, Phokion G. Kolaitis, and Arne Meier. Disjunctions of Two Dependence Atoms. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 10:1-10:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{frohlich_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.10,
  author =	{Fr\"{o}hlich, Nicolas and Kolaitis, Phokion G. and Meier, Arne},
  title =	{{Disjunctions of Two Dependence Atoms}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254343},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dependence logic, coherence, model-checking, complexity, functional dependencies}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.23
Enumeration Kernels for Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set

Authors: Marin Bougeret, Guilherme C. M. Gomes, Vinicius F. dos Santos, and Ignasi Sau

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
Enumerative kernelization is a recent and promising area sitting at the intersection of parameterized complexity and enumeration algorithms. Its study began with the paper of Creignou et al. [Theory Comput. Syst., 2017], and development in the area has started to accelerate with the work of Golovach et al. [J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 2022]. The latter introduced polynomial-delay enumeration kernels and applied them in the study of structural parameterizations of the Matching Cut problem and some variants. Few other results, mostly on Longest Path and some generalizations of Matching Cut, have also been developed. However, little success has been seen in enumeration versions of Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set, some of the most studied problems in kernelization. In this paper, we address this shortcoming. Our first result is a polynomial-delay enumeration kernel with 2k vertices for Enum Vertex Cover, where we wish to list all solutions with at most k vertices. This is obtained by developing a non-trivial lifting algorithm for the classical crown decomposition reduction rule, and directly improves upon the kernel with 𝒪(k²) vertices derived from the work of Creignou et al. Our other result is a polynomial-delay enumeration kernel with 𝒪(k³) vertices and edges for Enum Feedback Vertex Set; the proof is inspired by some ideas of Thomassé [TALG, 2010], but with a weaker bound on the kernel size due to difficulties in applying the q-expansion technique.
Cite as

Marin Bougeret, Guilherme C. M. Gomes, Vinicius F. dos Santos, and Ignasi Sau. Enumeration Kernels for Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bougeret_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.23,
  author =	{Bougeret, Marin and C. M. Gomes, Guilherme and dos Santos, Vinicius F. and Sau, Ignasi},
  title =	{{Enumeration Kernels for Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251552},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Kernelization, Enumeration, Vertex cover, Crown decomposition, Feedback vertex set}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.19
On the Enumeration of Signatures of XOR-CNF’s

Authors: Nadia Creignou, Oscar Defrain, Frédéric Olive, and Simon Vilmin

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 349, 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)

Abstract
Given a CNF formula φ with clauses C_1, … , C_m over a set of variables V, a truth assignment 𝐚: V → {0, 1} generates a binary sequence σ_φ(𝐚) = (C_1(𝐚), …, C_m(𝐚)), called a signature of φ, where C_i(𝐚) = 1 if clause C_i evaluates to 1 under assignment 𝐚, and C_i(𝐚) = 0 otherwise. Signatures and their associated generation problems have given rise to new yet promising research questions in algorithmic enumeration. In a recent paper, Bérczi et al. interestingly proved that generating signatures of a CNF is tractable despite the fact that verifying a solution is hard. They also showed the hardness of finding maximal signatures of an arbitrary CNF due to the intractability of satisfiability in general. Their contribution leaves open the problem of efficiently generating maximal signatures for tractable classes of CNFs, i.e., those for which satisfiability can be solved in polynomial time. Stepping into that direction, we completely characterize the complexity of generating all, minimal, and maximal signatures for XOR-CNF’s.
Cite as

Nadia Creignou, Oscar Defrain, Frédéric Olive, and Simon Vilmin. On the Enumeration of Signatures of XOR-CNF’s. In 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 349, pp. 19:1-19:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{creignou_et_al:LIPIcs.WADS.2025.19,
  author =	{Creignou, Nadia and Defrain, Oscar and Olive, Fr\'{e}d\'{e}ric and Vilmin, Simon},
  title =	{{On the Enumeration of Signatures of XOR-CNF’s}},
  booktitle =	{19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-398-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{349},
  editor =	{Morin, Pat and Oh, Eunjin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242508},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algorithmic enumeration, XOR-CNF, signatures, maximal bipartite subgraphs enumeration, extension, proximity search}
}
Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Grossi.19
Designing Output Sensitive Algorithms for Subgraph Enumeration

Authors: Alessio Conte, Kazuhiro Kurita, Andrea Marino, Giulia Punzi, Takeaki Uno, and Kunihiro Wasa

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 132, From Strings to Graphs, and Back Again: A Festschrift for Roberto Grossi's 60th Birthday (2025)

Abstract
The enumeration of all subgraphs respecting some structural property is a fundamental task in theoretical computer science, with practical applications in many branches of data mining and network analysis. It is often of interest to only consider solutions (subgraphs) that are maximal under inclusion, and to achieve output-sensitive complexity, i.e., bounding the running time with respect to the number of subgraphs produced. In this paper, we provide a survey of techniques for designing output-sensitive algorithms for subgraph enumeration, including partition-based approaches such as flashlight search, solution-graph traversal methods such as reverse search, and cost amortization strategies such as push-out amortization. We also briefly discuss classes of efficiency, hardness of enumeration, and variants such as approximate enumeration. The paper is meant as an accessible handbook for learning the basics of the field and as a practical reference for selecting state-of-the-art subgraph enumeration strategies fitting to one’s needs.
Cite as

Alessio Conte, Kazuhiro Kurita, Andrea Marino, Giulia Punzi, Takeaki Uno, and Kunihiro Wasa. Designing Output Sensitive Algorithms for Subgraph Enumeration. In From Strings to Graphs, and Back Again: A Festschrift for Roberto Grossi's 60th Birthday. Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 132, pp. 19:1-19:40, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{conte_et_al:OASIcs.Grossi.19,
  author =	{Conte, Alessio and Kurita, Kazuhiro and Marino, Andrea and Punzi, Giulia and Uno, Takeaki and Wasa, Kunihiro},
  title =	{{Designing Output Sensitive Algorithms for Subgraph Enumeration}},
  booktitle =	{From Strings to Graphs, and Back Again: A Festschrift for Roberto Grossi's 60th Birthday},
  pages =	{19:1--19:40},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-391-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{132},
  editor =	{Conte, Alessio and Marino, Andrea and Rosone, Giovanna and Vitter, Jeffrey Scott},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Grossi.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238180},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Grossi.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph algorithms, Graph enumeration, Output sensitive enumeration}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17
Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks

Authors: Mohimenul Kabir, Van-Giang Trinh, Samuel Pastva, and Kuldeep S Meel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Boolean Networks (BNs) serve as a fundamental modeling framework for capturing complex dynamical systems across various domains, including systems biology, computational logic, and artificial intelligence. A crucial property of BNs is the presence of trap spaces - subspaces of the state space that, once entered, cannot be exited. Minimal trap spaces, in particular, play a significant role in analyzing the long-term behavior of BNs, making their efficient enumeration and counting essential. The fixed points in BNs are a special case of minimal trap spaces. In this work, we formulate several meaningful counting problems related to minimal trap spaces and fixed points in BNs. These problems provide valuable insights both within BN theory (e.g., in probabilistic reasoning and dynamical analysis) and in broader application areas, including systems biology, abstract argumentation, and logic programming. To address these computational challenges, we propose novel methods based on approximate answer set counting, leveraging techniques from answer set programming. Our approach efficiently approximates the number of minimal trap spaces and the number of fixed points without requiring exhaustive enumeration, making it particularly well-suited for large-scale BNs. Our experimental evaluation on an extensive and diverse set of benchmark instances shows that our methods significantly improve the feasibility of counting minimal trap spaces and fixed points, paving the way for new applications in BN analysis and beyond.
Cite as

Mohimenul Kabir, Van-Giang Trinh, Samuel Pastva, and Kuldeep S Meel. Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 17:1-17:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kabir_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.17,
  author =	{Kabir, Mohimenul and Trinh, Van-Giang and Pastva, Samuel and Meel, Kuldeep S},
  title =	{{Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238780},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational systems biology, Boolean network, Fixed point, Trap space, Answer set counting, Projected counting, Abstract argumentation, Logic programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.10
The Complexity of Second-Order HyperLTL

Authors: Hadar Frenkel and Martin Zimmermann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
We determine the complexity of second-order HyperLTL satisfiability, finite-state satisfiability, and model-checking: All three are equivalent to truth in third-order arithmetic. We also consider two fragments of second-order HyperLTL that have been introduced with the aim to facilitate effective model-checking by restricting the sets one can quantify over. The first one restricts second-order quantification to smallest/largest sets that satisfy a guard while the second one restricts second-order quantification further to least fixed points of (first-order) HyperLTL definable functions. All three problems for the first fragment are still equivalent to truth in third-order arithmetic while satisfiability for the second fragment is Σ₁¹-complete, i.e., only as hard as for (first-order) HyperLTL and therefore much less complex. Finally, finite-state satisfiability and model-checking are in Σ₂² and are Σ₁¹-hard, and thus also less complex than for full second-order HyperLTL.
Cite as

Hadar Frenkel and Martin Zimmermann. The Complexity of Second-Order HyperLTL. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 10:1-10:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{frenkel_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.10,
  author =	{Frenkel, Hadar and Zimmermann, Martin},
  title =	{{The Complexity of Second-Order HyperLTL}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227679},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: HyperLTL, Satisfiability, Model-checking}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2021.40
Parameterised Counting in Logspace

Authors: Anselm Haak, Arne Meier, Om Prakash, and Raghavendra Rao B. V.

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 187, 38th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2021)

Abstract
Logarithmic space bounded complexity classes such as L and NL play a central role in space bounded computation. The study of counting versions of these complexity classes have lead to several interesting insights into the structure of computational problems such as computing the determinant and counting paths in directed acyclic graphs. Though parameterised complexity theory was initiated roughly three decades ago by Downey and Fellows, a satisfactory study of parameterised logarithmic space bounded computation was developed only in the last decade by Elberfeld, Stockhusen and Tantau (IPEC 2013, Algorithmica 2015). In this paper, we introduce a new framework for parameterised counting in logspace, inspired by the parameterised space bounded models developed by Elberfeld, Stockhusen and Tantau (IPEC 2013, Algorithmica 2015). They defined the operators para_W and para_β for parameterised space complexity classes by allowing bounded nondeterminism with multiple-read and read-once access, respectively. Using these operators, they characterised the parameterised complexity of natural problems on graphs. In the spirit of the operators para_W and para_β by Stockhusen and Tantau, we introduce variants based on tail-nondeterminism, para_{W[1]} and para_{βtail}. Then, we consider counting versions of all four operators applied to logspace and obtain several natural complete problems for the resulting classes: counting of paths in digraphs, counting first-order models for formulas, and counting graph homomorphisms. Furthermore, we show that the complexity of a parameterised variant of the determinant function for (0,1)-matrices is #para_{βtail} L-hard and can be written as the difference of two functions in #para_{βtail} L. These problems exhibit the richness of the introduced counting classes. Our results further indicate interesting structural characteristics of these classes. For example, we show that the closure of #para_{βtail} L under parameterised logspace parsimonious reductions coincides with #para_β L, that is, modulo parameterised reductions, tail-nondeterminism with read-once access is the same as read-once nondeterminism. Initiating the study of closure properties of these parameterised logspace counting classes, we show that all introduced classes are closed under addition and multiplication, and those without tail-nondeterminism are closed under parameterised logspace parsimonious reductions. Also, we show that the counting classes defined can naturally be characterised by parameterised variants of classes based on branching programs in analogy to the classical counting classes. Finally, we underline the significance of this topic by providing a promising outlook showing several open problems and options for further directions of research.
Cite as

Anselm Haak, Arne Meier, Om Prakash, and Raghavendra Rao B. V.. Parameterised Counting in Logspace. In 38th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 187, pp. 40:1-40:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{haak_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2021.40,
  author =	{Haak, Anselm and Meier, Arne and Prakash, Om and Rao B. V., Raghavendra},
  title =	{{Parameterised Counting in Logspace}},
  booktitle =	{38th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2021)},
  pages =	{40:1--40:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-180-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{187},
  editor =	{Bl\"{a}ser, Markus and Monmege, Benjamin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2021.40},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-136859},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2021.40},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized Complexity, Counting Complexity, Logspace}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.10
Team Semantics for the Specification and Verification of Hyperproperties

Authors: Andreas Krebs, Arne Meier, Jonni Virtema, and Martin Zimmermann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 117, 43rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2018)

Abstract
We develop team semantics for Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to express hyperproperties, which have recently been identified as a key concept in the verification of information flow properties. Conceptually, we consider an asynchronous and a synchronous variant of team semantics. We study basic properties of this new logic and classify the computational complexity of its satisfiability, path, and model checking problem. Further, we examine how extensions of these basic logics react on adding other atomic operators. Finally, we compare its expressivity to the one of HyperLTL, another recently introduced logic for hyperproperties. Our results show that LTL under team semantics is a viable alternative to HyperLTL, which complements the expressivity of HyperLTL and has partially better algorithmic properties.
Cite as

Andreas Krebs, Arne Meier, Jonni Virtema, and Martin Zimmermann. Team Semantics for the Specification and Verification of Hyperproperties. In 43rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 117, pp. 10:1-10:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{krebs_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.10,
  author =	{Krebs, Andreas and Meier, Arne and Virtema, Jonni and Zimmermann, Martin},
  title =	{{Team Semantics for the Specification and Verification of Hyperproperties}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2018)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-086-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{117},
  editor =	{Potapov, Igor and Spirakis, Paul and Worrell, James},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-95926},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: LTL, Hyperproperties, Team Semantics, Model Checking, Satisfiability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.32
Model Checking and Validity in Propositional and Modal Inclusion Logics

Authors: Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto, Arne Meier, and Jonni Virtema

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 83, 42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2017)

Abstract
Propositional and modal inclusion logic are formalisms that belong to the family of logics based on team semantics. This article investigates the model checking and validity problems of these logics. We identify complexity bounds for both problems, covering both lax and strict team semantics. By doing so, we come close to finalising the programme that ultimately aims to classify the complexities of the basic reasoning problems for modal and propositional dependence, independence, and inclusion logics.
Cite as

Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto, Arne Meier, and Jonni Virtema. Model Checking and Validity in Propositional and Modal Inclusion Logics. In 42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 83, pp. 32:1-32:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hella_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.32,
  author =	{Hella, Lauri and Kuusisto, Antti and Meier, Arne and Virtema, Jonni},
  title =	{{Model Checking and Validity in Propositional and Modal Inclusion Logics}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2017)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-046-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{83},
  editor =	{Larsen, Kim G. and Bodlaender, Hans L. and Raskin, Jean-Francois},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-81007},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Inclusion Logic, Model Checking, Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2016.23
Backdoors for Linear Temporal Logic

Authors: Arne Meier, Sebastian Ordyniak, Ramanujan Sridharan, and Irena Schindler

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 63, 11th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2016)

Abstract
In the present paper, we introduce the backdoor set approach into the field of temporal logic for the global fragment of linear temporal logic. We study the parameterized complexity of the satisfiability problem parameterized by the size of the backdoor. We distinguish between backdoor detection and evaluation of backdoors into the fragments of Horn and Krom formulas. Here we classify the operator fragments of globally-operators for past/future/always, and the combination of them. Detection is shown to be fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) whereas the complexity of evaluation behaves differently. We show that for Krom formulas the problem is paraNP-complete. For Horn formulas, the complexity is shown to be either fixed parameter tractable or paraNP-complete depending on the considered operator fragment.
Cite as

Arne Meier, Sebastian Ordyniak, Ramanujan Sridharan, and Irena Schindler. Backdoors for Linear Temporal Logic. In 11th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 63, pp. 23:1-23:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{meier_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2016.23,
  author =	{Meier, Arne and Ordyniak, Sebastian and Sridharan, Ramanujan and Schindler, Irena},
  title =	{{Backdoors for Linear Temporal Logic}},
  booktitle =	{11th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2016)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-023-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{63},
  editor =	{Guo, Jiong and Hermelin, Danny},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2016.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-69462},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2016.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Linear Temporal Logic, Parameterized Complexity, Backdoor Sets}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.5
Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic

Authors: Olaf Beyersdorff, Arne Meier, Sebastian Müller, Michael Thomas, and Heribert Vollmer

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10061, Circuits, Logic, and Games (2010)

Abstract
Default logic is one of the most popular and successful formalisms for non-monotonic reasoning. In 2002, Bonatti and Olivetti introduced several sequent calculi for credulous and skeptical reasoning in propositional default logic. In this paper we examine these calculi from a proof-complexity perspective. In particular, we show that the calculus for credulous reasoning obeys almost the same bounds on the proof size as Gentzen's system LK. Hence proving lower bounds for credulous reasoning will be as hard as proving lower bounds for LK. On the other hand, we show an exponential lower bound to the proof size in Bonatti and Olivetti's enhanced calculus for skeptical default reasoning.
Cite as

Olaf Beyersdorff, Arne Meier, Sebastian Müller, Michael Thomas, and Heribert Vollmer. Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic. In Circuits, Logic, and Games. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10061, pp. 1-14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beyersdorff_et_al:DagSemProc.10061.5,
  author =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Meier, Arne and M\"{u}ller, Sebastian and Thomas, Michael and Vollmer, Heribert},
  title =	{{Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic}},
  booktitle =	{Circuits, Logic, and Games},
  pages =	{1--14},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{10061},
  editor =	{Benjamin Rossman and Thomas Schwentick and Denis Th\'{e}rien and Heribert Vollmer},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25261},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof complexity, default logic, sequent calculus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.6
The Complexity of Reasoning for Fragments of Autoepistemic Logic

Authors: Nadia Creignou, Arne Meier, Michael Thomas, and Heribert Vollmer

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10061, Circuits, Logic, and Games (2010)

Abstract
Autoepistemic logic extends propositional logic by the modal operator L. A formula that is preceded by an L is said to be "believed". The logic was introduced by Moore 1985 for modeling an ideally rational agent's behavior and reasoning about his own beliefs. In this paper we analyze all Boolean fragments of autoepistemic logic with respect to the computational complexity of the three most common decision problems expansion existence, brave reasoning and cautious reasoning. As a second contribution we classify the computational complexity of counting the number of stable expansions of a given knowledge base. To the best of our knowledge this is the first paper analyzing the counting problem for autoepistemic logic.
Cite as

Nadia Creignou, Arne Meier, Michael Thomas, and Heribert Vollmer. The Complexity of Reasoning for Fragments of Autoepistemic Logic. In Circuits, Logic, and Games. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10061, pp. 1-10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{creignou_et_al:DagSemProc.10061.6,
  author =	{Creignou, Nadia and Meier, Arne and Thomas, Michael and Vollmer, Heribert},
  title =	{{The Complexity of Reasoning for Fragments of Autoepistemic Logic}},
  booktitle =	{Circuits, Logic, and Games},
  pages =	{1--10},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{10061},
  editor =	{Benjamin Rossman and Thomas Schwentick and Denis Th\'{e}rien and Heribert Vollmer},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25234},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Autoepistemic logic, computational complexity, nonmonotonic reasoning, Post's lattice}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 13 Document/PDF
  • 7 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 5 2025
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2018
  • 2 2017
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 7 Meier, Arne
  • 2 Creignou, Nadia
  • 2 Thomas, Michael
  • 2 Virtema, Jonni
  • 2 Vollmer, Heribert
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 10 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 2 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Graph enumeration
  • 2 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • 1 Applied computing → Systems biology
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Logic programming and answer set programming
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Enumeration
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Model Checking
  • 2 Parameterized Complexity
  • 2 Satisfiability
  • 1 Abstract argumentation
  • 1 Algorithmic enumeration
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact