69 Search Results for "Schaub, Torsten"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 7

Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming

ICLP 2010, July 16-19, 2010, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Editors: Manuel Hermenegildo and Torsten Schaub

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36
Verifying Datalog Reasoning with Lean

Authors: Johannes Tantow, Lukas Gerlach, Stephan Mennicke, and Markus Krötzsch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Datalog is an essential logical rule language with many applications, and modern rule engines compute logical consequences for Datalog with high performance and scalability. While Datalog is rather simple and, in principle, explainable by design, such sophisticated implementations and optimizations are hard to verify. We therefore propose a certificate-based approach to validate results of Datalog reasoners in a formally verified checker for Datalog proofs. Using the proof assistant Lean, we implement such a checker and verify its correctness against direct formalizations of the Datalog semantics. We propose two JSON encodings for Datalog proofs: one using the widely supported Datalog proof trees, and one using directed acyclic graphs for succinctness. To evaluate the practical feasibility and performance of our approach, we validate proofs that we obtain by converting derivation traces of an existing Datalog reasoner into our tool-independent format.
Cite as

Johannes Tantow, Lukas Gerlach, Stephan Mennicke, and Markus Krötzsch. Verifying Datalog Reasoning with Lean. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 36:1-36:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{tantow_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36,
  author =	{Tantow, Johannes and Gerlach, Lukas and Mennicke, Stephan and Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
  title =	{{Verifying Datalog Reasoning with Lean}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246342},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Certifying Algorithms, Datalog, Formal Verification}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17
Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks

Authors: Mohimenul Kabir, Van-Giang Trinh, Samuel Pastva, and Kuldeep S Meel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Boolean Networks (BNs) serve as a fundamental modeling framework for capturing complex dynamical systems across various domains, including systems biology, computational logic, and artificial intelligence. A crucial property of BNs is the presence of trap spaces - subspaces of the state space that, once entered, cannot be exited. Minimal trap spaces, in particular, play a significant role in analyzing the long-term behavior of BNs, making their efficient enumeration and counting essential. The fixed points in BNs are a special case of minimal trap spaces. In this work, we formulate several meaningful counting problems related to minimal trap spaces and fixed points in BNs. These problems provide valuable insights both within BN theory (e.g., in probabilistic reasoning and dynamical analysis) and in broader application areas, including systems biology, abstract argumentation, and logic programming. To address these computational challenges, we propose novel methods based on approximate answer set counting, leveraging techniques from answer set programming. Our approach efficiently approximates the number of minimal trap spaces and the number of fixed points without requiring exhaustive enumeration, making it particularly well-suited for large-scale BNs. Our experimental evaluation on an extensive and diverse set of benchmark instances shows that our methods significantly improve the feasibility of counting minimal trap spaces and fixed points, paving the way for new applications in BN analysis and beyond.
Cite as

Mohimenul Kabir, Van-Giang Trinh, Samuel Pastva, and Kuldeep S Meel. Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 17:1-17:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kabir_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.17,
  author =	{Kabir, Mohimenul and Trinh, Van-Giang and Pastva, Samuel and Meel, Kuldeep S},
  title =	{{Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238780},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational systems biology, Boolean network, Fixed point, Trap space, Answer set counting, Projected counting, Abstract argumentation, Logic programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.38
Reducing Quantum Circuit Synthesis to #SAT

Authors: Dekel Zak, Jingyi Mei, Jean-Marie Lagniez, and Alfons Laarman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Quantum circuit synthesis is the task of decomposing a given quantum operator into a sequence of elementary quantum gates. Since the finite target gate set cannot exactly implement any given operator, approximation is often necessary. Model counting, or #SAT, has recently been demonstrated as a promising new approach for tackling core problems in quantum circuit analysis. In this work, we show for the first time that the universal quantum circuit synthesis problem can be reduced to maximum model counting. We formulate a #SAT encoding for exact and approximate depth-optimal quantum circuit synthesis into the Clifford+T gate set. We evaluate our method with an open-source implementation that uses the maximum model counter d4Max as a backend. For this purpose, we extended d4Max with support for complex and negative weights to represent amplitudes. Experimental results show that existing classical tools have potential for the quantum circuit synthesis problem.
Cite as

Dekel Zak, Jingyi Mei, Jean-Marie Lagniez, and Alfons Laarman. Reducing Quantum Circuit Synthesis to #SAT. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 38:1-38:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zak_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.38,
  author =	{Zak, Dekel and Mei, Jingyi and Lagniez, Jean-Marie and Laarman, Alfons},
  title =	{{Reducing Quantum Circuit Synthesis to #SAT}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238997},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maximum weighted model counting, quantum circuit synthesis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26
Analyzing Reformulation Performance in Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving

Authors: André Schidler and Stefan Szeider

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Core-guided algorithms like OLL are among the best methods for solving the Maximum Satisfiability problem (MaxSAT). Although some performance characteristics of OLL have been studied, a comprehensive experimental analysis of its reformulation behavior is still missing. In this paper, we present a large-scale study on how different reformulations of a MaxSAT instance produced by OLL affect solver performance. By representing these reformulations as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), we isolate the impact of structural features - such as the size and interconnectivity of unsatisfiable cores - on solver runtime. Our extensive experimental evaluation of over 600k solver runs reveals clear correlations between DAG properties and performance outcomes. These results suggest a new avenue for designing heuristics that steer the solver toward more tractable reformulations. All OLL DAGs and performance data from our experiments are publicly available to foster further research.
Cite as

André Schidler and Stefan Szeider. Analyzing Reformulation Performance in Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 26:1-26:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schidler_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26,
  author =	{Schidler, Andr\'{e} and Szeider, Stefan},
  title =	{{Analyzing Reformulation Performance in Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237605},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: maximum satisfiability, OLL, core-guided}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17
Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability

Authors: George Katsirelos

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
The core-guided algorithm OLL is the basis of some of the most successful algorithms for MaxSAT in recent evaluations. It works by iteratively finding cores of the formula and transforming it so that it exhibits a higher lower bound. It has recently been shown to implicitly discover cores of the original formula, as well as a compact representation of its reasoning within a linear program. In this paper, we use and extend these results to design a practical MaxSAT solver. We show an explicit linear program which matches and usually exceeds the bound computed by OLL. We show that OLL can be restated as an algorithm that explicitly computes a feasible dual solution of this linear program. This restated algorithm naturally works with an arbitrary dual solution. It can in fact be used to improve any LP representation of the MaxSAT instance. This presents a large increase of the potential design space for such algorithms. We describe some potential improvements from this insight and show that an implementation outperforms the state of the art algorithms on the set of instances from the latest MaxSAT evaluation.
Cite as

George Katsirelos. Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 17:1-17:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{katsirelos:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17,
  author =	{Katsirelos, George},
  title =	{{Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237513},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: maximum satisfiability, core-guided solvers, linear programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.3
Elements for Weighted Answer-Set Programming

Authors: Francisco Coelho, Bruno Dinis, Dietmar Seipel, and Salvador Abreu

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 135, 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)

Abstract
Logic programs, more specifically, answer-set programs, can be annotated with probabilities on facts to express uncertainty. We address the problem of propagating weight annotations on facts (e.g. probabilities) of an answer-set program to its stable models, and from there to events (defined as sets of atoms) in a dataset over the program’s domain. We propose a novel approach which is algebraic in the sense that it relies on an equivalence relation over the set of events. Uncertainty is then described as polynomial expressions over variables. We propagate the weight function in the space of models and events, rather than doing so within the syntax of the program. As evidence that our approach is sound, we show that certain facts behave as expected. Our approach allows us to investigate weight annotated programs and to determine how suitable a given one is for modeling a given dataset containing events. It’s core is illustrated by a running example and the encoding of a Bayesian network.
Cite as

Francisco Coelho, Bruno Dinis, Dietmar Seipel, and Salvador Abreu. Elements for Weighted Answer-Set Programming. In 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 135, pp. 3:1-3:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{coelho_et_al:OASIcs.SLATE.2025.3,
  author =	{Coelho, Francisco and Dinis, Bruno and Seipel, Dietmar and Abreu, Salvador},
  title =	{{Elements for Weighted Answer-Set Programming}},
  booktitle =	{14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:16},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-387-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{135},
  editor =	{Baptista, Jorge and Barateiro, Jos\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236836},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer-Set Programming, Stable Models, Probabilistic Logic Programming}
}
Document
Position
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.2.1.2
Grounding Stream Reasoning Research

Authors: Pieter Bonte, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Daniel de Leng, Daniele Dell'Aglio, Emanuele Della Valle, Thomas Eiter, Federico Giannini, Fredrik Heintz, Konstantin Schekotihin, Danh Le-Phuoc, Alessandra Mileo, Patrik Schneider, Riccardo Tommasini, Jacopo Urbani, and Giacomo Ziffer

Published in: TGDK, Volume 2, Issue 1 (2024): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 2, Issue 1

Abstract
In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in applying AI technologies to implement complex data analytics over data streams. To this end, researchers in various fields have been organising a yearly event called the "Stream Reasoning Workshop" to share perspectives, challenges, and experiences around this topic. In this paper, the previous organisers of the workshops and other community members provide a summary of the main research results that have been discussed during the first six editions of the event. These results can be categorised into four main research areas: The first is concerned with the technological challenges related to handling large data streams. The second area aims at adapting and extending existing semantic technologies to data streams. The third and fourth areas focus on how to implement reasoning techniques, either considering deductive or inductive techniques, to extract new and valuable knowledge from the data in the stream. This summary is written not only to provide a crystallisation of the field, but also to point out distinctive traits of the stream reasoning community. Moreover, it also provides a foundation for future research by enumerating a list of use cases and open challenges, to stimulate others to join this exciting research area.
Cite as

Pieter Bonte, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Daniel de Leng, Daniele Dell'Aglio, Emanuele Della Valle, Thomas Eiter, Federico Giannini, Fredrik Heintz, Konstantin Schekotihin, Danh Le-Phuoc, Alessandra Mileo, Patrik Schneider, Riccardo Tommasini, Jacopo Urbani, and Giacomo Ziffer. Grounding Stream Reasoning Research. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 2, Issue 1, pp. 2:1-2:47, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{bonte_et_al:TGDK.2.1.2,
  author =	{Bonte, Pieter and Calbimonte, Jean-Paul and de Leng, Daniel and Dell'Aglio, Daniele and Della Valle, Emanuele and Eiter, Thomas and Giannini, Federico and Heintz, Fredrik and Schekotihin, Konstantin and Le-Phuoc, Danh and Mileo, Alessandra and Schneider, Patrik and Tommasini, Riccardo and Urbani, Jacopo and Ziffer, Giacomo},
  title =	{{Grounding Stream Reasoning Research}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{2:1--2:47},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.2.1.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-198597},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.2.1.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stream Reasoning, Stream Processing, RDF streams, Streaming Linked Data, Continuous query processing, Temporal Logics, High-performance computing, Databases}
}
Document
Vision
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.1.1.9
Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-Based AI for Self-Determination

Authors: Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, John Domingue, Sabrina Kirrane, Oshani Seneviratne, Aisling Third, and Maria-Esther Vidal

Published in: TGDK, Volume 1, Issue 1 (2023): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 1, Issue 1

Abstract
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as fundamental platforms for powering intelligent decision-making and a wide range of Artificial Intelligence (AI) services across major corporations such as Google, Walmart, and AirBnb. KGs complement Machine Learning (ML) algorithms by providing data context and semantics, thereby enabling further inference and question-answering capabilities. The integration of KGs with neuronal learning (e.g., Large Language Models (LLMs)) is currently a topic of active research, commonly named neuro-symbolic AI. Despite the numerous benefits that can be accomplished with KG-based AI, its growing ubiquity within online services may result in the loss of self-determination for citizens as a fundamental societal issue. The more we rely on these technologies, which are often centralised, the less citizens will be able to determine their own destinies. To counter this threat, AI regulation, such as the European Union (EU) AI Act, is being proposed in certain regions. The regulation sets what technologists need to do, leading to questions concerning How the output of AI systems can be trusted? What is needed to ensure that the data fuelling and the inner workings of these artefacts are transparent? How can AI be made accountable for its decision-making? This paper conceptualises the foundational topics and research pillars to support KG-based AI for self-determination. Drawing upon this conceptual framework, challenges and opportunities for citizen self-determination are illustrated and analysed in a real-world scenario. As a result, we propose a research agenda aimed at accomplishing the recommended objectives.
Cite as

Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, John Domingue, Sabrina Kirrane, Oshani Seneviratne, Aisling Third, and Maria-Esther Vidal. Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-Based AI for Self-Determination. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 9:1-9:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{ibanez_et_al:TGDK.1.1.9,
  author =	{Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez, Luis-Daniel and Domingue, John and Kirrane, Sabrina and Seneviratne, Oshani and Third, Aisling and Vidal, Maria-Esther},
  title =	{{Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-Based AI for Self-Determination}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{9:1--9:32},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{1},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-194839},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.1.1.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Trust, Accountability, Autonomy, AI, Knowledge Graphs}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.2
Temporal Modalities in Answer Set Programming (Invited Talk)

Authors: Pedro Cabalar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 178, 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)

Abstract
Based on the answer set (or stable model) semantics for logic programs, Answer Set Programming (ASP) has become one of the most successful paradigms for practical Knowledge Representation and problem solving. Although ASP is naturally equipped for solving static combinatorial problems up to NP complexity (or ΣP2 in the disjunctive case) its application to temporal scenarios has been frequent since its very beginning, partly due to its early use for reasoning about actions and change. Temporal problems normally suppose an extra challenge for ASP for several reasons. On the one hand, they normally raise the complexity (in the case of classical planning, for instance, it becomes PSPACE-complete), although this is usually accounted for by making repeated calls to an ASP solver. On the other hand, temporal scenarios also pose a representational challenge, since the basic ASP language does not support temporal expressions. To fill this representational gap, a temporal extension of ASP called Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) was proposed in and extensively studied later. This formalism constitutes a modal, linear-time extension of Equilibrium Logic which, in its turn, is a complete logical characterisation of (standard) ASP based on the intermediate logic of Here-and-There (HT). As a result, TEL is an expressive non-monotonic modal logic that shares the syntax of Linear-Time Temporal Logic (LTL) but interprets temporal formulas under a non-monotonic semantics that properly extends stable models.
Cite as

Pedro Cabalar. Temporal Modalities in Answer Set Programming (Invited Talk). In 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 178, pp. 2:1-2:5, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cabalar:LIPIcs.TIME.2020.2,
  author =	{Cabalar, Pedro},
  title =	{{Temporal Modalities in Answer Set Programming}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:5},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-167-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{178},
  editor =	{Mu\~{n}oz-Velasco, Emilio and Ozaki, Ana and Theobald, Martin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-129707},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Logic Programming, Temporal Logic, Answer Set Programming, Modal Logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2
Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5

Authors: Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Max Ostrowski, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 52, Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)

Abstract
Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a model, ground, and solve paradigm. The integration of application- or theory-specific reasoning into ASP systems thus impacts on many if not all elements of its workflow, viz. input language, grounding, intermediate language, solving, and output format. We address this challenge with the fifth generation of the ASP system clingo and its grounding and solving components by equipping them with well-defined generic interfaces facilitating the manifold integration efforts. On the grounder's side, we introduce a generic way of specifying language extensions and propose an intermediate format accommodating their ground representation. At the solver end, this is accompanied by high-level interfaces easing the integration of theory propagators dealing with these extensions.
Cite as

Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Max Ostrowski, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko. Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5. In Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 52, pp. 2:1-2:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gebser_et_al:OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2,
  author =	{Gebser, Martin and Kaminski, Roland and Kaufmann, Benjamin and Ostrowski, Max and Schaub, Torsten and Wanko, Philipp},
  title =	{{Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-007-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{52},
  editor =	{Carro, Manuel and King, Andy and Saeedloei, Neda and De Vos, Marina},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-67337},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Theory Language, Theory Propagation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.3
Computing Diverse Optimal Stable Models

Authors: Javier Romero, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 52, Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)

Abstract
We introduce a comprehensive framework for computing diverse (or similar) solutions to logic programs with preferences. Our framework provides a wide spectrum of complete and incomplete methods for solving this task. Apart from proposing several new methods, it also accommodates existing ones and generalizes them to programs with preferences. Interestingly, this is accomplished by integrating and automating several basic ASP techniques - being of general interest even beyond diversification. The enabling factor of this lies in the recent advance of multi-shot ASP solving that provides us with fine-grained control over reasoning processes and abolishes the need for solver modifications and wrappers that were indispensable in previous approaches. Our framework is implemented as an extension to the ASP-based preference handling system asprin. We use the resulting system asprin 2 for an empirical evaluation of the diversification methods comprised in our framework.
Cite as

Javier Romero, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko. Computing Diverse Optimal Stable Models. In Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 52, pp. 3:1-3:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{romero_et_al:OASIcs.ICLP.2016.3,
  author =	{Romero, Javier and Schaub, Torsten and Wanko, Philipp},
  title =	{{Computing Diverse Optimal Stable Models}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:14},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-007-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{52},
  editor =	{Carro, Manuel and King, Andy and Saeedloei, Neda and De Vos, Marina},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-67348},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Diversity, Similarity, Preferences}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.9
Answer Set Solving with Generalized Learned Constraints

Authors: Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Patrick Lühne, Javier Romero, and Torsten Schaub

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 52, Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)

Abstract
Conflict learning plays a key role in modern Boolean constraint solving. Advanced in satisfiability testing, it has meanwhile become a base technology in many neighboring fields, among them answer set programming (ASP). However, learned constraints are only valid for a currently solved problem instance and do not carry over to similar instances. We address this issue in ASP and introduce a framework featuring an integrated feedback loop that allows for reusing conflict constraints. The idea is to extract (propositional) conflict constraints, generalize and validate them, and reuse them as integrity constraints. Although we explore our approach in the context of dynamic applications based on transition systems, it is driven by the ultimate objective of overcoming the issue that learned knowledge is bound to specific problem instances. We implemented this workflow in two systems, namely, a variant of the ASP solver clasp that extracts integrity constraints along with a downstream system for generalizing and validating them.
Cite as

Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Patrick Lühne, Javier Romero, and Torsten Schaub. Answer Set Solving with Generalized Learned Constraints. In Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 52, pp. 9:1-9:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gebser_et_al:OASIcs.ICLP.2016.9,
  author =	{Gebser, Martin and Kaminski, Roland and Kaufmann, Benjamin and L\"{u}hne, Patrick and Romero, Javier and Schaub, Torsten},
  title =	{{Answer Set Solving with Generalized Learned Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-007-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{52},
  editor =	{Carro, Manuel and King, Andy and Saeedloei, Neda and De Vos, Marina},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-67393},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Conflict Learning, Constraint Generalization, Generalized Constraint Feedback}
}
Document
Complete Volume
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010
LIPIcs, Volume 7, ICLP'10, Complete Volume

Authors: Manuel Hermenegildo and Torsten Schaub

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 7, Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (2010)

Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 7, ICLP'10, Complete Volume
Cite as

Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{hermenegildo_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2010,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 7, ICLP'10, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-17-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{7},
  editor =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-41018},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010},
  annote =	{Keywords: Logic Programming, Concurrent Programming, Distribution, Maintenance, and Enhancement, Language Classifications, Language Constructs and Features Software/ Program Verification, Models of Computation, Modes of Computation, Semantics of Programming Languages, Mathematical Logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.176
aspeed: ASP-based Solver Scheduling

Authors: Holger Hoos, Roland Kaminski, Torsten Schaub, and Marius Schneider

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 17, Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12) (2012)

Abstract
Although Boolean Constraint Technology has made tremendous progress over the last decade, it suffers from a great sensitivity to search configuration. This problem was impressively counterbalanced at the 2011 SAT Competition by the rather simple approach of ppfolio relying on a handmade, uniform and unordered solver schedule. Inspired by this, we take advantage of the modeling and solving capacities of ASP to automatically determine more refined, that is, non-uniform and ordered solver schedules from existing benchmarking data. We begin by formulating the determination of such schedules as multi-criteria optimization problems and provide corresponding ASP encodings. The resulting encodings are easily customizable for different settings and the computation of optimum schedules can mostly be done in the blink of an eye, even when dealing with large runtime data sets stemming from many solvers on hundreds to thousands of instances. Also, its high customizability made it easy to generate even parallel schedules for multi-core machines.
Cite as

Holger Hoos, Roland Kaminski, Torsten Schaub, and Marius Schneider. aspeed: ASP-based Solver Scheduling. In Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 17, pp. 176-187, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hoos_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.176,
  author =	{Hoos, Holger and Kaminski, Roland and Schaub, Torsten and Schneider, Marius},
  title =	{{aspeed: ASP-based Solver Scheduling}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12)},
  pages =	{176--187},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-43-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{17},
  editor =	{Dovier, Agostino and Santos Costa, V{\'\i}tor},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.176},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-36208},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.176},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algorithm Schedule, Portfolio-based Solving, Answer Set Programming}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 68 Document/PDF
  • 8 Document/HTML
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 6 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2020
  • 3 2016
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 14 Schaub, Torsten
  • 4 Kaminski, Roland
  • 4 Kaufmann, Benjamin
  • 3 Brewka, Gerhard
  • 3 Gebser, Martin
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 52 LIPIcs
  • 4 OASIcs
  • 2 TGDK
  • 2 DagSemRep
  • 8 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Logic programming and answer set programming
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Temporal reasoning
  • 2 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 1 Applied computing → Systems biology
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 7 Answer Set Programming
  • 4 Answer set programming
  • 4 logic programming
  • 3 Inductive Logic Programming
  • 3 Probabilistic Logic Programming
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact