32 Search Results for "Shaltiel, Ronen"


Document
Time and Space Efficient Deterministic List Decoding

Authors: Joshua Cook and Dana Moshkovitz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
Error correcting codes encode messages by codewords in such a way that even if some of the codeword is corrupted, the message can be decoded. Typical decoding algorithms for error correcting codes either use linear space or quadratic time. A natural question is whether codes can be decoded in near-linear time and sub-linear space simultaneously. A recent result by Cook and Moshkovitz gave efficient decoders that can uniquely decode Reed-Muller and other codes from a constant fraction (less than half) of corruption. In this work, we address the problem of list decoding in near-linear time and sub-linear space. In the list decoding setting, most of the codeword is corrupted, and one wants to output a short list of potential messages that contains the true message. For any constants γ, τ > 0, we give decoders for Reed-Muller codes that can decode from 1-γ fraction of corruptions in time n^{1+τ} and space n^{τ}. Our decoders work by extending the iterative correction technique of Cook and Moshkovitz. However, that technique, which gradually decreases the number of corruptions in the message, was tailored to the unique decoding setting. We first identify an intermediate problem, codewords list recovery, for which we can make iterative correction work. We then show how to reduce general list decoding to the codewords list recovery problem in efficient time and space. The reduction relies on local correction and testing. In the codewords list recovery problem, the input consists of n unordered lists containing exactly the symbols from L codewords, where a small fraction of the lists is corrupted. The goal is to find the L codewords. In addition, we prove that any linear code with time-space efficient encoding or decoding must be local, in the sense that the codewords satisfy a local linear constraint. This rules out codes like Reed-Solomon from having time-space efficient encoding or decoding.

Cite as

Joshua Cook and Dana Moshkovitz. Time and Space Efficient Deterministic List Decoding. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 42:1-42:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cook_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.42,
  author =	{Cook, Joshua and Moshkovitz, Dana},
  title =	{{Time and Space Efficient Deterministic List Decoding}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253292},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reed-Muller code, local correction, local testing}
}
Document
How to Use Nondeterminism in Cryptography

Authors: Marshall Ball and Peter Crawford-Kahrl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
Nondeterministic reductions have yielded powerful results in the theory of computational complexity, yet are effectively useless in a cryptographic context. The reason for this is simple, a nondeterministic polynomial time adversary can trivially break almost any cryptographic primitive by simply guessing the "key." In order to use this powerful nondeterministic tool kit in the cryptographic context, we initiate the study of cryptography against adversaries with limited nondeterminism: polynomial time nondeterministic algorithms that are restricted to just a few bits of nondeterminism. We demonstrate that limited nondeterministic security is sufficient to prove two foundational results that have eluded our grasp for decades: dream hardness amplification, and extracting ω(log n) hardcore bits.

Cite as

Marshall Ball and Peter Crawford-Kahrl. How to Use Nondeterminism in Cryptography. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 15:1-15:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ball_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.15,
  author =	{Ball, Marshall and Crawford-Kahrl, Peter},
  title =	{{How to Use Nondeterminism in Cryptography}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253024},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: limited nondeterminism, cryptography, computational complexity, hardness amplification, pseudorandom generators, hardcore bits}
}
Document
Quantum Advantage from Sampling Shallow Circuits: Beyond Hardness of Marginals

Authors: Daniel Grier, Daniel M. Kane, Jackson Morris, Anthony Ostuni, and Kewen Wu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
We construct a family of distributions {𝒟_n}_n with 𝒟_n over {0, 1}ⁿ and a family of depth-7 quantum circuits {C_n}_n such that 𝒟_n is produced exactly by C_n with the all zeros state as input, yet any constant-depth classical circuit with bounded fan-in gates evaluated on any binary product distribution has total variation distance 1 - e^{-Ω(n)} from 𝒟_n. Moreover, the quantum circuits we construct are geometrically local and use a relatively standard gate set: Hadamard, controlled-phase, CNOT, and Toffoli gates. All previous separations of this type suffer from some undesirable constraint on the classical circuit model or the quantum circuits witnessing the separation. Our family of distributions is inspired by the Parity Halving Problem of Watts, Kothari, Schaeffer, and Tal (STOC, 2019), which built on the work of Bravyi, Gosset, and König (Science, 2018) to separate shallow quantum and classical circuits for relational problems.

Cite as

Daniel Grier, Daniel M. Kane, Jackson Morris, Anthony Ostuni, and Kewen Wu. Quantum Advantage from Sampling Shallow Circuits: Beyond Hardness of Marginals. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 73:1-73:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grier_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.73,
  author =	{Grier, Daniel and Kane, Daniel M. and Morris, Jackson and Ostuni, Anthony and Wu, Kewen},
  title =	{{Quantum Advantage from Sampling Shallow Circuits: Beyond Hardness of Marginals}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{73:1--73:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.73},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253607},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.73},
  annote =	{Keywords: Shallow circuits, sampling, quantum circuits}
}
Document
Improved Rate for Non-Malleable Codes and Time-Lock Puzzles

Authors: Cody Freitag, Ilan Komargodski, Manu Kondapaneni, and Jad Silbak

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
Non-malleable codes allow a sender to transmit a message to a receiver, while providing a "best-possible" integrity guarantee to ensure that no attacker - who cannot already decode the message - can meaningfully tamper the message in transit. If tampered, the received message should either be invalid or unrelated to the original message. Non-malleable time-lock puzzles (TLPs) are a special case of non-malleable codes for bounded polynomial-depth tampering with very efficient encoding. In this work, we give generic techniques for constructing non-malleable codes and non-malleable TLPs with improved rate, which captures the ratio of a message’s length to its encoding length. A key contribution of our work is identifying a security notion for non-malleability, which we term "CCA-hiding", sufficient for our compilers. CCA-hiding is a relaxation of CCA-security for encryption or commitments to the fine-grained setting of codes, and requires that the encoded message remains hidden, even given a decoding oracle for any other codeword. Intriguingly, CCA-hiding does not imply non-malleability in the fine-grained setting, as is the case for encryption and commitments. Using our new techniques, we give the following constructions: - Rate-1 CCA-hiding TLPs in the plain model. - Rate-1 non-malleable codes for bounded polynomial-depth tampering in the auxiliary-input random oracle model (AI-ROM). - Rate-(1/2) non-malleable TLPs in the AI-ROM.

Cite as

Cody Freitag, Ilan Komargodski, Manu Kondapaneni, and Jad Silbak. Improved Rate for Non-Malleable Codes and Time-Lock Puzzles. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 62:1-62:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{freitag_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.62,
  author =	{Freitag, Cody and Komargodski, Ilan and Kondapaneni, Manu and Silbak, Jad},
  title =	{{Improved Rate for Non-Malleable Codes and Time-Lock Puzzles}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{62:1--62:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.62},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253490},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.62},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non-malleable codes, Time-lock puzzles}
}
Document
Hardness of Range Avoidance and Proof Complexity Generators from Demi-Bits

Authors: Hanlin Ren, Yichuan Wang, and Yan Zhong

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
Given a circuit G: {0, 1}ⁿ → {0, 1}^m with m > n, the range avoidance problem (Avoid) asks to output a string y ∈ {0, 1}^m that is not in the range of G. Besides its profound connection to circuit complexity and explicit construction problems, this problem is also related to the existence of proof complexity generators - circuits G: {0, 1}ⁿ → {0, 1}^m where m > n but for every y ∈ {0, 1}^m, it is infeasible to prove the statement "y ̸ ∈ Range(G)" in a given propositional proof system. This paper connects these two problems with the existence of demi-bits generators, a fundamental cryptographic primitive against nondeterministic adversaries introduced by Rudich (RANDOM '97). - We show that the existence of demi-bits generators implies Avoid is hard for nondeterministic algorithms. This resolves an open problem raised by Chen and Li (STOC '24). Furthermore, assuming the demi-hardness of certain LPN-style generators or Goldreich’s PRG, we prove the hardness of Avoid even when the instances are constant-degree polynomials over 𝔽₂. - We show that the dual weak pigeonhole principle is unprovable in Cook’s theory PV₁ under the existence of demi-bits generators secure against AM/_{O(1)}, thereby separating Jeřábek’s theory APC₁ from PV₁. Previously, Ilango, Li, and Williams (STOC '23) obtained the same separation under different (and arguably stronger) cryptographic assumptions. - We transform demi-bits generators to proof complexity generators that are pseudo-surjective in certain parameter regime. Pseudo-surjectivity is the strongest form of hardness considered in the literature for proof complexity generators. Our constructions are inspired by the recent breakthroughs on the hardness of Avoid by Ilango, Li, and Williams (STOC '23) and Chen and Li (STOC '24). We use randomness extractors to significantly simplify the construction and the proof.

Cite as

Hanlin Ren, Yichuan Wang, and Yan Zhong. Hardness of Range Avoidance and Proof Complexity Generators from Demi-Bits. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 111:1-111:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ren_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.111,
  author =	{Ren, Hanlin and Wang, Yichuan and Zhong, Yan},
  title =	{{Hardness of Range Avoidance and Proof Complexity Generators from Demi-Bits}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{111:1--111:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.111},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253982},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.111},
  annote =	{Keywords: Range Avoidance, Proof Complexity Generators}
}
Document
RANDOM
Consumable Data via Quantum Communication

Authors: Dar Gilboa, Siddhartha Jain, and Jarrod R. McClean

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)


Abstract
Classical data can be copied and re-used for computation, with adverse consequences economically and in terms of data privacy. Motivated by this, we formulate problems in one-way communication complexity where Alice holds some data x and Bob holds m inputs y_1, …, y_m. They want to compute m instances of a bipartite relation R(⋅,⋅) on every pair (x, y_1), …, (x, y_m). We call this the asymmetric direct sum question for one-way communication. We give examples where the quantum communication complexity of such problems scales polynomially with m, while the classical communication complexity depends at most logarithmically on m. Thus, for such problems, data behaves like a consumable resource that is effectively destroyed upon use when the owner stores and transmits it as quantum states, but not when transmitted classically. We show an application to a strategic data-selling game, and discuss other potential economic implications.

Cite as

Dar Gilboa, Siddhartha Jain, and Jarrod R. McClean. Consumable Data via Quantum Communication. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 39:1-39:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gilboa_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.39,
  author =	{Gilboa, Dar and Jain, Siddhartha and McClean, Jarrod R.},
  title =	{{Consumable Data via Quantum Communication}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244059},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum communication, one-time programs, data markets}
}
Document
RANDOM
Bit-Fixing Extractors for Almost-Logarithmic Entropy

Authors: Dean Doron and Ori Fridman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)


Abstract
An oblivious bit-fixing source is a distribution over {0,1}ⁿ, where k bits are uniform and independent and the rest n-k are fixed a priori to some constant value. Extracting (close to) true randomness from an oblivious bit-fixing source has been studied since the 1980s, with applications in cryptography and complexity theory. We construct explicit extractors for oblivious bit-fixing source that support k = Õ(log n), outputting almost all the entropy with low error. The previous state-of-the-art construction that outputs many bits is due to Rao [Rao, CCC '09], and requires entropy k ≥ log^{c} n for some large constant c. The two key components in our constructions are new low-error affine condensers for poly-logarithmic entropies (that we achieve using techniques from the nonmalleable extractors literature), and a dual use of linear condensers for OBF sources.

Cite as

Dean Doron and Ori Fridman. Bit-Fixing Extractors for Almost-Logarithmic Entropy. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 33:1-33:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{doron_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.33,
  author =	{Doron, Dean and Fridman, Ori},
  title =	{{Bit-Fixing Extractors for Almost-Logarithmic Entropy}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243994},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Seedless extractors, oblivious bit-fixing sources}
}
Document
RANDOM
On Sums of INW Pseudorandom Generators

Authors: William M. Hoza and Zelin Lv

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)


Abstract
We study a new approach for constructing pseudorandom generators (PRGs) that fool constant-width standard-order read-once branching programs (ROBPs). Let X be the n-bit output distribution of the INW PRG (Impagliazzo, Nisan, and Wigderson, STOC 1994), instantiated using expansion parameter λ. We prove that the bitwise XOR of t independent copies of X fools width-w programs with error n^{log(w + 1)} ⋅ (λ⋅log n)^t. Notably, this error bound is meaningful even for relatively large values of λ such as λ = 1/O(log n). Admittedly, our analysis does not yet imply any improvement in the bottom-line overall seed length required for fooling such programs - it just gives a new way of re-proving the well-known O(log² n) bound. Furthermore, we prove that this shortcoming is not an artifact of our analysis, but rather is an intrinsic limitation of our "XOR of INW" approach. That is, no matter how many copies of the INW generator we XOR together, and no matter how we set the expansion parameters, if the generator fools width-3 programs and the proof of correctness does not use any properties of the expander graphs except their spectral expansion, then we prove that the seed length of the generator is inevitably Ω(log² n). Still, we hope that our work might be a step toward constructing near-optimal PRGs fooling constant-width ROBPs. We suggest that one could try running the INW PRG on t correlated seeds, sampled via another PRG, and taking the bitwise XOR of the outputs.

Cite as

William M. Hoza and Zelin Lv. On Sums of INW Pseudorandom Generators. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 67:1-67:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hoza_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.67,
  author =	{Hoza, William M. and Lv, Zelin},
  title =	{{On Sums of INW Pseudorandom Generators}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{67:1--67:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.67},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244330},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.67},
  annote =	{Keywords: INW generator, pseudorandomness, space-bounded computation, XOR Lemmas}
}
Document
RANDOM
List-Recovery of Random Linear Codes over Small Fields

Authors: Dean Doron, Jonathan Mosheiff, Nicolas Resch, and João Ribeiro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)


Abstract
We study list-recoverability of random linear codes over small fields, both from errors and from erasures. We consider codes of rate ε-close to capacity, and aim to bound the dependence of the output list size L on ε, the input list size 𝓁, and the alphabet size q. Prior to our work, the best upper bound was L = q^O(𝓁/ε) (Zyablov and Pinsker, Prob. Per. Inf. 1981). Previous work has identified cases in which linear codes provably perform worse than non-linear codes with respect to list-recovery. While there exist non-linear codes that achieve L = O(𝓁/ε), we know that L ≥ 𝓁^Ω(1/ε) is necessary for list recovery from erasures over fields of small characteristic, and for list recovery from errors over large alphabets. We show that in other relevant regimes there is no significant price to pay for linearity, in the sense that we get the correct dependence on the gap-to-capacity ε and go beyond the Zyablov-Pinsker bound for the first time. Specifically, when q is constant and ε approaches zero, - For list-recovery from erasures over prime fields, we show that L ≤ C₁/ε. By prior work, such a result cannot be obtained for low-characteristic fields. - For list-recovery from errors over arbitrary fields, we prove that L ≤ C₂/ε. Above, C₁ and C₂ depend on the decoding radius, input list size, and field size. We provide concrete bounds on the constants above, and the upper bounds on L improve upon the Zyablov-Pinsker bound whenever q ≤ 2^{(1/ε)^c} for some small universal constant c > 0.

Cite as

Dean Doron, Jonathan Mosheiff, Nicolas Resch, and João Ribeiro. List-Recovery of Random Linear Codes over Small Fields. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 57:1-57:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{doron_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.57,
  author =	{Doron, Dean and Mosheiff, Jonathan and Resch, Nicolas and Ribeiro, Jo\~{a}o},
  title =	{{List-Recovery of Random Linear Codes over Small Fields}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{57:1--57:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.57},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244239},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.57},
  annote =	{Keywords: List recovery, random linear codes}
}
Document
Online Condensing of Unpredictable Sources via Random Walks

Authors: Dean Doron, Dana Moshkovitz, Justin Oh, and David Zuckerman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
A natural model of a source of randomness consists of a long stream of symbols X = X_1∘…∘X_t, with some guarantee on the entropy of X_i conditioned on the outcome of the prefix x_1,… ,x_{i-1}. We study unpredictable sources, a generalization of the almost Chor-Goldreich (CG) sources considered in [Doron et al., 2023]. In an unpredictable source X, for a typical draw of x ∼ X, for most i-s, the element x_i has a low probability of occurring given x_1,… ,x_{i-1}. Such a model relaxes the often unrealistic assumption of a CG source that for every i, and every x_1,… ,x_{i-1}, the next symbol X_i has sufficiently large entropy. Unpredictable sources subsume all previously considered notions of almost CG sources, including notions that [Doron et al., 2023] failed to analyze, and including those that are equivalent to general sources with high min entropy. For a lossless expander G = (V,E) with m = log |V|, we consider a random walk V_0,V_1,…,V_t on G using unpredictable instructions that have sufficient entropy with respect to m. Our main theorem is that for almost all the steps t/2 ≤ i ≤ t in the walk, the vertex V_i is close to a distribution with min-entropy at least m-O(1). As a result, we obtain seeded online condensers with constant entropy gap, and seedless (deterministic) condensers outputting a constant fraction of the entropy. In particular, our condensers run in space comparable to the output entropy, as opposed to the size of the stream, and even when the length t of the stream is not known ahead of time. As another corollary, we obtain a new extractor based on expander random walks handling lower entropy than the classic expander based construction relying on spectral techniques [Gillman, 1998]. As our main technical tool, we provide a novel analysis covering a key case of adversarial random walks on lossless expanders that [Doron et al., 2023] fails to address. As part of the analysis, we provide a "chain rule for vertex probabilities". The standard chain rule states that for every x ∼ X and i, Pr(x_1,… ,x_i) = Pr[X_i = x_i|X_[1,i-1] = x_1,… ,x_{i-1}] ⋅ Pr(x_1,… ,x_{i-1}). If W(x₁,… ,x_i) is the vertex reached using x₁,… ,x_i, then the chain rule for vertex probabilities essentially states that the same phenomena occurs for a typical x: Pr [V_i = W(x_1,… ,x_i)] ≲ Pr[X_i = x_i|X_[1,i-1] = x_1,… ,x_{i-1}] ⋅ Pr[V_{i-1} = W(x_1,… ,x_{i-1})], where V_i is the vertex distribution of the random walk at step i using X.

Cite as

Dean Doron, Dana Moshkovitz, Justin Oh, and David Zuckerman. Online Condensing of Unpredictable Sources via Random Walks. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 30:1-30:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{doron_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.30,
  author =	{Doron, Dean and Moshkovitz, Dana and Oh, Justin and Zuckerman, David},
  title =	{{Online Condensing of Unpredictable Sources via Random Walks}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237243},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: Randomness Extractors, Expander Graphs}
}
Document
Towards Free Lunch Derandomization from Necessary Assumptions (And OWFs)

Authors: Marshall Ball, Lijie Chen, and Roei Tell

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
The question of optimal derandomization, introduced by Doron et. al (JACM 2022), garnered significant recent attention. Works in recent years showed conditional superfast derandomization algorithms, as well as conditional impossibility results, and barriers for obtaining superfast derandomization using certain black-box techniques. Of particular interest is the extreme high-end, which focuses on "free lunch" derandomization, as suggested by Chen and Tell (FOCS 2021). This is derandomization that incurs essentially no time overhead, and errs only on inputs that are infeasible to find. Constructing such algorithms is challenging, and so far there have not been any results following the one in their initial work. In their result, their algorithm is essentially the classical Nisan-Wigderson generator, and they relied on an ad-hoc assumption asserting the existence of a function that is non-batch-computable over all polynomial-time samplable distributions. In this work we deduce free lunch derandomization from a variety of natural hardness assumptions. In particular, we do not resort to non-batch-computability, and the common denominator for all of our assumptions is hardness over all polynomial-time samplable distributions, which is necessary for the conclusion. The main technical components in our proofs are constructions of new and superfast targeted generators, which completely eliminate the time overheads that are inherent to all previously known constructions. In particular, we present an alternative construction for the targeted generator by Chen and Tell (FOCS 2021), which is faster than the original construction, and also more natural and technically intuitive. These contributions significantly strengthen the evidence for the possibility of free lunch derandomization, distill the required assumptions for such a result, and provide the first set of dedicated technical tools that are useful for studying the question.

Cite as

Marshall Ball, Lijie Chen, and Roei Tell. Towards Free Lunch Derandomization from Necessary Assumptions (And OWFs). In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 31:1-31:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ball_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.31,
  author =	{Ball, Marshall and Chen, Lijie and Tell, Roei},
  title =	{{Towards Free Lunch Derandomization from Necessary Assumptions (And OWFs)}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237259},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pseudorandomness, Derandomization}
}
Document
Multiplicative Extractors for Samplable Distributions

Authors: Ronen Shaltiel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
Trevisan and Vadhan (FOCS 2000) introduced the notion of (seedless) extractors for samplable distributions as a way to extract random keys for cryptographic protocols from weak sources of randomness. They showed that under a very strong complexity theoretic assumption, there exists a constant α > 0 such that for every constant c ≥ 1, there is an extractor Ext:{0,1}ⁿ → {0,1}^Ω(n), such that for every distribution X over {0,1}ⁿ with H_∞(X) ≥ (1-α) ⋅ n that is samplable by size n^c circuits, the distribution Ext(X) is ε-close to uniform for ε = 1/(n^c), and furthermore, Ext is computable in time poly(n^c). Recently, Ball, Goldin, Dachman-Soled and Mutreja (FOCS 2023) gave a substantial improvement, and achieved the same conclusion under the weaker (and by now standard) assumption that there exists a constant β > 0, and a problem in E = DTIME(2^O(n)) that requires size 2^(βn) nondeterministic circuits. In this paper we give an alternative proof of this result with the following advantages: - Our extractors have "multiplicative error": It is guaranteed that for every event A ⊆ {0,1}^m, Pr[Ext(X) ∈ A] ≤ (1+ε) ⋅ Pr[U_m ∈ A]. (This should be contrasted with the standard notion that only implies Pr[Ext(X) ∈ A] ≤ ε + Pr[U_m ∈ A]). Consequently, unlike the (additive) extractors of Trevisan and Vadhan, and Ball et al., our multiplicative extractors guarantee that in the application of selecting keys for cryptographic protocols, if when choosing a random key, the probability that an adversary can steal the honest party’s money is n^{-ω(1)}, then this also holds when using the output of the extractor as a key. Our multiplicative extractors are a key component in the recent subsequent work of Ball, Shaltiel and Silbak (STOC 2025) that constructs extractors for samplable distributions with low min-entropy. This is another demonstration of the usefulness of multiplicative extractors. We remark that a related notion of multiplicative extractors was defined by Applebaum, Artemenko, Shaltiel and Yang (CCC 2015) who showed that black-box techniques cannot yield extractors with additive error ε = n^{-ω(1)}, under the assumption assumed by Ball et al. or Trevisan and Vadhan. This motivated Applebaum et al. to consider multiplicative extractors, and they gave constructions based on the original hardness assumption of Trevisan and Vadhan. - Our proof is significantly simpler, and more modular than that of Ball et al. (and arguably also than that of Trevisan and Vadhan). A key observation is that the extractors that we want to construct, easily follow from a seed-extending pseudorandom generator against nondeterministic circuits (with the twist that the error is measured multiplicatively, as in computational differential privacy). We then proceed to construct such pseudorandom generators under the hardness assumption. This turns out to be easier (utilizing amongst other things, ideas by Trevisan and Vadhan, and by Ball et al.) Trevisan and Vadhan also asked whether lower bounds against nondeterministic circuits are necessary to achieve extractors for samplable distributions. While we cannot answer this question, we show that the proof techniques used in our paper (as well as those used in previous work) produce extractors which imply seed-extending PRGs against nondeterministic circuits, which in turn imply lower bounds against nondeterministic circuits.

Cite as

Ronen Shaltiel. Multiplicative Extractors for Samplable Distributions. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 22:1-22:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shaltiel:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.22,
  author =	{Shaltiel, Ronen},
  title =	{{Multiplicative Extractors for Samplable Distributions}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237163},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Randomness Extractors, Samplable Distributions, Hardness vsRandomness}
}
Document
Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes

Authors: Meghal Gupta, Venkatesan Guruswami, and Mihir Singhal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
In order to communicate a message over a noisy channel, a sender (Alice) uses an error-correcting code to encode her message, a bitstring x, into a codeword. The receiver (Bob) decodes x correctly whenever there is at most a small constant fraction of adversarial errors in the transmitted codeword. We investigate the setting where Bob is restricted to be a low-space streaming algorithm. Specifically, Bob receives the message as a stream and must process it and write x in order to a write-only tape while using low (say polylogarithmic) space. Note that such a primitive then allows the execution of any downstream streaming computation on x. We show three basic results about this setting, which are informally as follows: [(i)] 1) There is a stream decodable code of near-quadratic length, resilient to error-fractions approaching the optimal bound of 1/4. 2) There is no stream decodable code of sub-quadratic length, even to correct any small constant fraction of errors. 3) If Bob need only compute a private linear function of the bits of x, instead of writing them all to the output tape, there is a stream decodable code of near-linear length. Our constructions use locally decodable codes with additional functionality in the decoding, and (for the result on linear functions) repeated tensoring. Our lower bound, which rather surprisingly demonstrates a strong information-theoretic limitation originating from a computational restriction, proceeds via careful control of the message indices that may be output during successive blocks of the stream, a task complicated by the arbitrary state of the decoder during the algorithm.

Cite as

Meghal Gupta, Venkatesan Guruswami, and Mihir Singhal. Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 13:1-13:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13,
  author =	{Gupta, Meghal and Guruswami, Venkatesan and Singhal, Mihir},
  title =	{{Tight Bounds for Stream Decodable Error-Correcting Codes}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237072},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coding theory, Streaming computation, Locally decodable code, Lower Bounds}
}
Document
Direct Sums for Parity Decision Trees

Authors: Tyler Besselman, Mika Göös, Siyao Guo, Gilbert Maystre, and Weiqiang Yuan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
Direct sum theorems state that the cost of solving k instances of a problem is at least Ω(k) times the cost of solving a single instance. We prove the first such results in the randomised parity decision tree model. We show that a direct sum theorem holds whenever (1) the lower bound for parity decision trees is proved using the discrepancy method; or (2) the lower bound is proved relative to a product distribution.

Cite as

Tyler Besselman, Mika Göös, Siyao Guo, Gilbert Maystre, and Weiqiang Yuan. Direct Sums for Parity Decision Trees. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 16:1-16:38, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{besselman_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.16,
  author =	{Besselman, Tyler and G\"{o}\"{o}s, Mika and Guo, Siyao and Maystre, Gilbert and Yuan, Weiqiang},
  title =	{{Direct Sums for Parity Decision Trees}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:38},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237105},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: direct sum, parity decision trees, query complexity}
}
Document
How to Construct Random Strings

Authors: Oliver Korten and Rahul Santhanam

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
We address the following fundamental question: is there an efficient deterministic algorithm that, given 1ⁿ, outputs a string of length n that has polynomial-time bounded Kolmogorov complexity Ω̃(n) or even n - o(n)? Under plausible complexity-theoretic assumptions, stating for example that there is an ε > 0 for which TIME[T(n)] ̸ ⊆ TIME^NP[T(n)^ε]/2^(εn) for appropriately chosen time-constructible T, we show that the answer to this question is positive (answering a question of [Hanlin Ren et al., 2022]), and that the Range Avoidance problem [Robert Kleinberg et al., 2021; Oliver Korten, 2021; Hanlin Ren et al., 2022] is efficiently solvable for uniform sequences of circuits with close to minimal stretch (answering a question of [Rahul Ilango et al., 2023]). We obtain our results by giving efficient constructions of pseudo-random generators with almost optimal seed length against algorithms with small advice, under assumptions of the form mentioned above. We also apply our results to give the first complexity-theoretic evidence for explicit constructions of objects such as rigid matrices (in the sense of Valiant) and Ramsey graphs with near-optimal parameters.

Cite as

Oliver Korten and Rahul Santhanam. How to Construct Random Strings. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 35:1-35:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{korten_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.35,
  author =	{Korten, Oliver and Santhanam, Rahul},
  title =	{{How to Construct Random Strings}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:32},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237290},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Explicit Constructions, Kolmogorov Complexity, Derandomization}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 32 Document/PDF
  • 21 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 5 2026
  • 15 2025
  • 4 2023
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2021
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 9 Shaltiel, Ronen
  • 4 Silbak, Jad
  • 3 Doron, Dean
  • 3 Kabanets, Valentine
  • 2 Artemenko, Sergei
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 30 LIPIcs
  • 2 DagRep

  • Refine by Classification
  • 10 Theory of computation → Pseudorandomness and derandomization
  • 8 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity
  • 6 Theory of computation → Computational complexity and cryptography
  • 4 Theory of computation → Error-correcting codes
  • 3 Theory of computation → Complexity classes
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 Derandomization
  • 3 Pseudorandomness
  • 2 List Decoding
  • 2 Randomness Extractors
  • 2 computational complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail