24 Search Results for "Volkovich, Ilya"


Document
Integer Points in Dilates of Polytopes

Authors: Shubhangi Saraf and Narmada Varadarajan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)


Abstract
In this paper we study how the number of integer points in a polytope grows as we dilate the polytope. We prove new and essentially tight bounds on this quantity by specifically studying dilates of the Hadamard polytope. The motivation for studying this question comes from the question of understanding the maximal number of monomials in a factor of a multivariate polynomial of s monomials. A recent result by Bhargava, Saraf and Volkovich [Bhargava et al., 2020] showed that if f is an n-variate polynomial, where each variable has degree d, and f has s monomials, then any factor of f has at most s^{O(d² log n)} monomials. The key technical ingredient of their proof was to show that any polytope with s vertices, where each vertex lies in {0,..,d}ⁿ can have at most s^{O(d² log n)} integer points. The precise dependence on d of the number of integer points was left open. We show that this bound, and in particular the dependence on d is essentially tight by studying dilates of the Hadamard polytope and proving new lower bounds on its number of integer points.

Cite as

Shubhangi Saraf and Narmada Varadarajan. Integer Points in Dilates of Polytopes. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 88:1-88:9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{saraf_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.88,
  author =	{Saraf, Shubhangi and Varadarajan, Narmada},
  title =	{{Integer Points in Dilates of Polytopes}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{88:1--88:9},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.88},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258948},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.88},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational geometry, Complexity theory, Integer polytopes}
}
Document
Upper and Lower Bounds for the Linear Ordering Principle

Authors: Edward A. Hirsch and Ilya Volkovich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)


Abstract
Korten and Pitassi (FOCS, 2024) defined a new complexity class L₂^P as the polynomial-time Turing closure of the Linear Ordering Principle (a total function extending finding the minimum of an order [M. Chiari and J. Krajíček, 1998] to the case where the order is not linear). They put it between MA (Merlin-Arthur protocols) and S₂^P (the second symmetric level of the polynomial hierarchy). In this paper we sandwich L₂^P between P^prMA and P^prSBP. (The oracles here are promise problems, and SBP is the only known class between MA and AM.) The containment in P^prSBP is proved via an iterative process that uses a prSBP oracle to estimate the average order rank of a subset and find the minimum of a linear order. Another containment result of this paper is P^prO₂^P ⊆ O₂^P (where O₂^P is the input-oblivious version of S₂^P). These containment results altogether have several byproducts: - We give an affirmative answer to an open question posed by Chakaravarthy and Roy (Computational Complexity, 2011) whether P^prMA ⊆ S₂^P, thereby settling the relative standing of the existing (non-oblivious) Karp–Lipton–style collapse results of [V. T. Chakaravarthy and S. Roy, 2011] and [J.-Y. Cai, 2007], - We give an affirmative answer to an open question of Korten and Pitassi whether a Karp-Lipton-style collapse can be proven for L₂^P, - We show that the Karp-Lipton-style collapse to P^prOMA is actually better than both known collapses to P^prMA due to Chakaravarthy and Roy (Computational Complexity, 2011) and to O₂^P also due to Chakaravarthy and Roy (STACS, 2006). Thus we resolve the controversy between previously incomparable Karp-Lipton collapses stemming from these two lines of research.

Cite as

Edward A. Hirsch and Ilya Volkovich. Upper and Lower Bounds for the Linear Ordering Principle. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 52:1-52:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hirsch_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.52,
  author =	{Hirsch, Edward A. and Volkovich, Ilya},
  title =	{{Upper and Lower Bounds for the Linear Ordering Principle}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{52:1--52:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.52},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255410},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.52},
  annote =	{Keywords: Complexity Classes, Structural Complexity Theory, Linear Ordering Principle, Symmetric Alternation, Merlin-Arthur Protocols, Karp-Lipton Collapse}
}
Document
New Algebrization Barriers to Circuit Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity of Missing-String

Authors: Lijie Chen, Yang Hu, and Hanlin Ren

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
The algebrization barrier, proposed by Aaronson and Wigderson (STOC '08, ToCT '09), captures the limitations of many complexity-theoretic techniques based on arithmetization. Notably, several circuit lower bounds that overcome the relativization barrier (Buhrman-Fortnow-Thierauf, CCC '98; Vinodchandran, TCS '05; Santhanam, STOC '07, SICOMP '09) remain subject to the algebrization barrier. In this work, we establish several new algebrization barriers to circuit lower bounds by studying the communication complexity of the following problem, called XOR-Missing-String: For m < 2^{n/2}, Alice gets a list of m strings x₁, … , x_m ∈ {0, 1}ⁿ, Bob gets a list of m strings y₁, … , y_m ∈ {0, 1}ⁿ, and the goal is to output a string s ∈ {0, 1}ⁿ that is not equal to x_i⊕ y_j for any i, j ∈ [m]. 1) We construct an oracle A₁ and its multilinear extension A₁̃ such that PostBPE^{A₁̃} has linear-size A₁-oracle circuits on infinitely many input lengths. That is, proving PostBPE ̸ ⊆ i.o.- SIZE[O(n)] requires non-algebrizing techniques. This barrier follows from a PostBPP communication lower bound for XOR-Missing-String. This is in contrast to the well-known algebrizing lower bound MA_E (⊆ PostBPE) ̸ ⊆ P/_poly. 2) We construct an oracle A₂ and its multilinear extension A₂̃ such that BPE^{A₂̃} has linear-size A₂-oracle circuits on all input lengths. Previously, a similar barrier was demonstrated by Aaronson and Wigderson, but in their result, A₂̃ is only a multiquadratic extension of A₂. Our results show that communication complexity is more useful than previously thought for proving algebrization barriers, as Aaronson and Wigderson wrote that communication-based barriers were "more contrived". This serves as an example of how XOR-Missing-String forms new connections between communication lower bounds and algebrization barriers. 3) Finally, we study algebrization barriers to circuit lower bounds for MA_E. Buhrman, Fortnow, and Thierauf proved a sub-half-exponential circuit lower bound for MA_E via algebrizing techniques. Toward understanding whether the half-exponential bound can be improved, we define a natural subclass of MA_E that includes their hard MA_E language, and prove the following result: For every super-half-exponential function h(n), we construct an oracle A₃ and its multilinear extension A₃̃ such that this natural subclass of MA_E^{A₃̃} has h(n)-size A₃-oracle circuits on all input lengths. This suggests that half-exponential might be the correct barrier for MA_E circuit lower bounds w.r.t. algebrizing techniques.

Cite as

Lijie Chen, Yang Hu, and Hanlin Ren. New Algebrization Barriers to Circuit Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity of Missing-String. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 37:1-37:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.37,
  author =	{Chen, Lijie and Hu, Yang and Ren, Hanlin},
  title =	{{New Algebrization Barriers to Circuit Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity of Missing-String}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253246},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: circuit lower bound, algebrization barrier, missing string, communication complexity}
}
Document
Debordering Closure Results in Determinantal and Pfaffian Ideals

Authors: Anakin Dey and Zeyu Guo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
One important question in algebraic complexity is understanding the complexity of polynomial ideals (Grochow, Bulletin of EATCS 131, 2020). Andrews and Forbes (STOC 2022) studied the determinantal ideals I^{det}_{n,m,r} generated by the r× r minors of n× m matrices. Over fields of characteristic zero or of sufficiently large characteristic, they showed that for any nonzero f ∈ I^{det}_{n,m,r}, the determinant of a t × t matrix of variables with t = Θ{r^{1/3}} is approximately computed by a constant-depth, polynomial-size f-oracle algebraic circuit, in the sense that the determinant lies in the border of such circuits. An analogous result was also obtained for Pfaffians in the same paper. In this work, we deborder the result of Andrews and Forbes by showing that when f has polynomial degree, the determinant is in fact exactly computed by a constant-depth, polynomial-size f-oracle algebraic circuit. We further establish an analogous result for Pfaffian ideals. Our results are established using the isolation lemma, combined with a careful analysis of straightening-law expansions of polynomials in determinantal and Pfaffian ideals.

Cite as

Anakin Dey and Zeyu Guo. Debordering Closure Results in Determinantal and Pfaffian Ideals. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 49:1-49:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dey_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.49,
  author =	{Dey, Anakin and Guo, Zeyu},
  title =	{{Debordering Closure Results in Determinantal and Pfaffian Ideals}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{49:1--49:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.49},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253363},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.49},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic circuit complexity, Isolation lemma, Debordering}
}
Document
One-Way Functions and Boundary Hardness of Randomized Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity

Authors: Yanyi Liu and Rafael Pass

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
We revisit the question of whether worst-case hardness of the time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity problem, MINK^{poly} - that is, determining whether a string is "structured" (i.e., K^t(x) < n-1) or "random" (i.e., K^{poly(t)} ≥ n-1) - suffices to imply the existence of one-way functions (OWF). Liu-Pass (CRYPTO'25) recently showed that worst-case hardness of a boundary version of MINK^{poly} - where, roughly speaking, the goal is to decide whether given an instance x, (a) x is K^poly-random (i.e., K^{poly(t)}(x) ≥ n-1), or just close to K^poly-random (i.e., K^{t}(x) < n-1 but K^{poly(t)} > n - log n) - characterizes OWF, but with either of the following caveats (1) considering a non-standard notion of probabilistic K^t, as opposed to the standard notion of K^t, or (2) assuming somewhat strong, and non-standard, derandomization assumptions. In this paper, we present an alternative method for establishing their result which enables significantly weakening the caveats. First, we show that boundary hardness of the more standard randomized K^t problem suffices (where randomized K^t(x) is defined just like K^t(x) except that the program generating the string x may be randomized). As a consequence of this result, we can provide a characterization also in terms of just "plain" K^t under the most standard derandomization assumption (used to derandomize just BPP into P) - namely E ̸ ⊆ ioSIZE[2^{o(n)}]. Our proof relies on language compression schemes of Goldberg-Sipser (STOC'85); using the same technique, we also present the the first worst-case to average-case reduction for the exact MINK^{poly} problem (under the same standard derandomization assumption), improving upon Hirahara’s celebrated results (STOC'18, STOC'21) that only applied to a gap version of the MINK^{poly} problem, referred to as GapMINK^{poly}, where the goal is to decide whether K^t(x) ≤ n-O(log n)) or K^{poly(t)}(x) ≥ n-1 and under the same derandomization assumption.

Cite as

Yanyi Liu and Rafael Pass. One-Way Functions and Boundary Hardness of Randomized Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 97:1-97:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{liu_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.97,
  author =	{Liu, Yanyi and Pass, Rafael},
  title =	{{One-Way Functions and Boundary Hardness of Randomized Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{97:1--97:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.97},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253849},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.97},
  annote =	{Keywords: One-way functions, Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity, Worst-case to Average-case Reductions}
}
Document
Total Search Problems in ZPP

Authors: Noah Fleming, Stefan Grosser, Siddhartha Jain, Jiawei Li, Hanlin Ren, Morgan Shirley, and Weiqiang Yuan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)


Abstract
We initiate a systematic study of TFZPP, the class of total NP search problems solvable by polynomial time randomized algorithms. TFZPP contains a variety of important search problems such as Bertrand-Chebyshev (finding a prime between N and 2N), refuter problems for many circuit lower bounds, and Lossy-Code. The Lossy-Code problem has found prominence due to its fundamental connections to derandomization, catalytic computing, and the metamathematics of complexity theory, among other areas. While TFZPP collapses to FP under standard derandomization assumptions in the white-box setting, we are able to separate TFZPP from the major TFNP subclasses in the black-box setting. In fact, we are able to separate it from every uniform TFNP class assuming that NP is not in quasi-polynomial time. To do so, we extend the connection between proof complexity and black-box TFNP to randomized proof systems and randomized reductions. Next, we turn to developing a taxonomy of TFZPP problems. We highlight a problem called Nephew, originating from an infinity axiom in set theory. We show that Nephew is in PWPP∩ TFZPP and conjecture that it is not reducible to Lossy-Code. Intriguingly, except for some artificial examples, most other black-box TFZPP problems that we are aware of reduce to Lossy-Code: - We define a problem called Empty-Child capturing finding a leaf in a rooted (binary) tree, and show that this problem is equivalent to Lossy-Code. We also show that a variant of Empty-Child with "heights" is complete for the intersection of SOPL and Lossy-Code. - We strengthen Lossy-Code with several combinatorial inequalities such as the AM-GM inequality. Somewhat surprisingly, we show the resulting new problems are still reducible to Lossy-Code. A technical highlight of this result is that they are proved by formalizations in bounded arithmetic, specifically in Jeřábek’s theory APC₁ (JSL 2007). - Finally, we show that the Dense-Linear-Ordering problem reduces to Lossy-Code.

Cite as

Noah Fleming, Stefan Grosser, Siddhartha Jain, Jiawei Li, Hanlin Ren, Morgan Shirley, and Weiqiang Yuan. Total Search Problems in ZPP. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 60:1-60:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fleming_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.60,
  author =	{Fleming, Noah and Grosser, Stefan and Jain, Siddhartha and Li, Jiawei and Ren, Hanlin and Shirley, Morgan and Yuan, Weiqiang},
  title =	{{Total Search Problems in ZPP}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{60:1--60:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.60},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253473},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.60},
  annote =	{Keywords: TFNP, lossy code, randomized proof systems, query complexity}
}
Document
Communication Complexity of Equality and Error-Correcting Codes

Authors: Dale Jacobs, John Jeang, Vladimir Podolskii, Morgan Prior, and Ilya Volkovich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)


Abstract
We study the public-coin randomized communication complexity of the equality function. The communication complexity of this function is known to be low when the error probability is constant and the players have access to many random bits. The complexity grows, however, if the allowed error probability and the amount of randomness are restricted. We show that public-coin randomized protocols for equality and error-correcting codes are essentially the same object. That is, given a protocol for equality, we can construct a code, and vice versa. We substantially extend the protocol-implies-code direction: any protocol computing a function with a large fooling set can be converted into an error-correcting code. As a corollary, we show that among functions with a fooling set of size s, equality on log s bits has the least randomized communication complexity, regardless of the restrictions on the error probability and the amount of randomness. Finally, we use the connection to error-correcting codes to analyze the randomized communication complexity of equality for varying restrictions on the error probability and the amount of randomness. In most cases, we provide tight bounds. We pinpoint the setting in which tight bounds are still unknown.

Cite as

Dale Jacobs, John Jeang, Vladimir Podolskii, Morgan Prior, and Ilya Volkovich. Communication Complexity of Equality and Error-Correcting Codes. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 37:1-37:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jacobs_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.37,
  author =	{Jacobs, Dale and Jeang, John and Podolskii, Vladimir and Prior, Morgan and Volkovich, Ilya},
  title =	{{Communication Complexity of Equality and Error-Correcting Codes}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251175},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: communication complexity, randomized communication complexity, error-correcting codes}
}
Document
Reconstruction of Depth 3 Arithmetic Circuits with Top Fan-In 3

Authors: Shubhangi Saraf and Devansh Shringi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
In this paper, we give the first subexponential (and in fact quasi-polynomial time) reconstruction algorithm for depth 3 circuits of top fan-in 3 (ΣΠΣ(3) circuits) over the fields ℝ and C. Concretely, we show that given blackbox access to an n-variate polynomial f computed by a ΣΠΣ(3) circuit of size s, there is a randomized algorithm that runs in time quasi-poly(n,s) and outputs a generalized ΣΠΣ(3) circuit computing f. The size s includes the bit complexity of coefficients appearing in the circuit. Depth 3 circuits of constant fan-in (ΣΠΣ(k) circuits) and closely related models have been extensively studied in the context of polynomial identity testing (PIT). The study of PIT for these models led to an understanding of the structure of identically zero ΣΠΣ(3) circuits and ΣΠΣ(k) circuits using some very elegant connections to discrete geometry, specifically the Sylvester-Gallai Theorem, and colorful and high dimensional variants of them. Despite a lot of progress on PIT for ΣΠΣ(k) circuits and more recently on PIT for depth 4 circuits of bounded top and bottom fan-in, reconstruction algorithms for ΣΠΣ(k) circuits has proven to be extremely challenging. In this paper, we build upon the structural results for identically zero ΣΠΣ(3) circuits that bound their rank, and prove stronger structural properties of ΣΠΣ(3) circuits (again using connections to discrete geometry). One such result is a bound on the number of codimension 3 subspaces on which a polynomial computed by an ΣΠΣ(3) circuit can vanish on. Armed with the new structural results, we provide the first reconstruction algorithms for ΣΠΣ(3) circuits over ℝ and C. Our work extends the work of [Sinha, CCC 2016] who provided a reconstruction algorithm for ΣΠΣ(2) circuits over ℝ and C as well as the works of [Shpilka, STOC 2007] who provided a reconstruction algorithms for ΣΠΣ(2) circuits in the setting of small finite fields, and [Karnin-Shpilka, CCC 2009] who provided reconstruction algorithms for ΣΠΣ(k) circuits in the setting of small finite fields.

Cite as

Shubhangi Saraf and Devansh Shringi. Reconstruction of Depth 3 Arithmetic Circuits with Top Fan-In 3. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 21:1-21:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{saraf_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.21,
  author =	{Saraf, Shubhangi and Shringi, Devansh},
  title =	{{Reconstruction of Depth 3 Arithmetic Circuits with Top Fan-In 3}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237151},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: arithmetic circuits, learning, reconstruction}
}
Document
Witness Encryption and NP-Hardness of Learning

Authors: Halley Goldberg and Valentine Kabanets

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)


Abstract
We study connections between two fundamental questions from computer science theory. (1) Is witness encryption possible for NP [Sanjam Garg et al., 2013]? That is, given an instance x of an NP-complete language L, can one encrypt a secret message with security contingent on the ability to provide a witness for x ∈ L? (2) Is computational learning (in the sense of [Leslie G. Valiant, 1984; Michael J. Kearns et al., 1994]) hard for NP? That is, is there a polynomial-time reduction from instances of L to instances of learning? Our main contribution is that certain formulations of NP-hardness of learning characterize the existence of witness encryption for NP. More specifically, we show: - witness encryption for a language L ∈ NP is equivalent to a half-Levin reduction from L to the Computational Gap Learning problem (denoted CGL [Benny Applebaum et al., 2008]), where a half-Levin reduction is the same as a Levin reduction but only required to preserve witnesses in one direction, and CGL formalizes agnostic learning as a decision problem. We show versions of the statement above for witness encryption secure against non-uniform and uniform adversaries. We also show that witness encryption for NP with ciphertexts of logarithmic length, along with a circuit lower bound for E, are together equivalent to NP-hardness of a generalized promise version of MCSP. We complement the above with a number of unconditional NP-hardness results for agnostic PAC learning. Extending a result of [Shuichi Hirahara, 2022] to the standard setting of boolean circuits, we show NP-hardness of "semi-proper" learning. Namely: - for some polynomial s, it is NP-hard to agnostically learn circuits of size s(n) by circuits of size s(n)⋅ n^{1/(log log n)^O(1)}. Looking beyond the computational model of standard boolean circuits enables us to prove NP-hardness of improper learning (ie. without a restriction on the size of hypothesis returned by the learner). We obtain such results for: - learning circuits with oracle access to a given randomly sampled string, and - learning RAM programs. In particular, we show that a variant of MINLT [Ker-I Ko, 1991] for RAM programs is NP-hard with parameters corresponding to the setting of improper learning. We view these results as partial progress toward the ultimate goal of showing NP-hardness of learning boolean circuits in an improper setting. Lastly, we give some consequences of NP-hardness of learning for private- and public-key cryptography. Improving a main result of [Benny Applebaum et al., 2008], we show that if improper agnostic PAC learning is NP-hard under a randomized non-adaptive reduction (with some restrictions), then NP ⊈ BPP implies the existence of i.o. one-way functions. In contrast, if CGL is NP-hard under a half-Levin reduction, then NP ⊈ BPP implies the existence of i.o. public-key encryption.

Cite as

Halley Goldberg and Valentine Kabanets. Witness Encryption and NP-Hardness of Learning. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 34:1-34:43, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goldberg_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34,
  author =	{Goldberg, Halley and Kabanets, Valentine},
  title =	{{Witness Encryption and NP-Hardness of Learning}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:43},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237281},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: agnostic PAC learning, witness encryption, NP-hardness}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
Faster & Deterministic FPT Algorithm for Worst-Case Tensor Decomposition

Authors: Vishwas Bhargava and Devansh Shringi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)


Abstract
We present a deterministic 2^{k^{𝒪(1)}} poly(n,d) time algorithm for decomposing d-dimensional, width-n tensors of rank at most k over ℝ and ℂ. This improves upon the previous randomized algorithm of Peleg, Shpilka, and Volk (ITCS '24) that takes 2^{k^{k^{𝒪(k)}}} poly(n,d) time and the deterministic n^k^k time algorithms of Bhargava, Saraf, and Volkovich (STOC '21). Our work resolves an open question asked by Peleg, Shpilka, and Volk (ITCS '24) on whether a deterministic Fixed Parameter Tractable (FPT) algorithm exists for worst-case tensor decomposition. We also make substantial progress on the fundamental problem of how the tractability of tensor decomposition varies as the tensor rank increases. Our result implies that we can achieve deterministic polynomial-time decomposition as long as the rank of the tensor is at most (log n)^{1/C}, where C is some fixed constant independent of n and d. Further, we note that there cannot exist a polynomial-time algorithm for k = ω(log n) unless ETH fails. Our algorithm works for all fields; however, the time complexity worsens to 2^{k^{k^{𝒪(1)}}} and requires randomization for finite fields of large characteristics. Both conditions are provably necessary unless there are improvements in the state of the art for system solving over the corresponding fields. Our approach achieves this by designing a proper learning (reconstruction) algorithm for set-multilinear depth-3 arithmetic circuits. On a technical note, we design a "partial" clustering algorithm for set-multilinear depth-3 arithmetic circuits that lets us isolate a cluster from any set-multilinear depth-3 circuit while preserving the structure of the circuit.

Cite as

Vishwas Bhargava and Devansh Shringi. Faster & Deterministic FPT Algorithm for Worst-Case Tensor Decomposition. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 28:1-28:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bhargava_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.28,
  author =	{Bhargava, Vishwas and Shringi, Devansh},
  title =	{{Faster \& Deterministic FPT Algorithm for Worst-Case Tensor Decomposition}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234052},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic circuits, Deterministic algorithms, FPT algorithm, Learning circuits, Reconstruction, Tensor Decomposition, Tensor Rank}
}
Document
Oblivious Complexity Classes Revisited: Lower Bounds and Hierarchies

Authors: Karthik Gajulapalli, Zeyong Li, and Ilya Volkovich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 323, 44th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2024)


Abstract
In this work we study oblivious complexity classes. These classes capture the power of interactive proofs where the prover(s) are only given the input size rather than the actual input. In particular, we study the connections between the symmetric polynomial time - S₂P and its oblivious counterpart - O₂P. Among our results: - For each k ∈ ℕ, we construct an explicit language L_k ∈ O₂P that cannot be computed by circuits of size n^k. - We prove a hierarchy theorem for O₂TIME. In particular, for any time constructible function t:ℕ → ℕ and any ε > 0 we show that: O₂TIME[t(n)] ⊊ O₂TIME[t(n)^{1 + ε}]. - We prove new structural results connecting O₂P and S₂P. - We make partial progress towards the resolution of an open question posed by Goldreich and Meir (TOCT 2015) that relates the complexity of NP to its oblivious counterpart - ONP. - We identify a natural class of problems in O₂P from computational Ramsey theory, that are not expected to be in 𝖯 or even BPP. To the best of our knowledge, these results constitute the first explicit fixed-polynomial lower bound and hierarchy theorem for O₂P. The smallest uniform complexity class for which such lower bounds were previously known was S₂P due to Cai (JCSS 2007). In addition, this is the first uniform hierarchy theorem for a semantic class. All previous results required some non-uniformity. In order to obtain some of the results in the paper, we introduce the notion of uniformly-sparse extensions which could be of independent interest. Our techniques build upon the de-randomization framework of the powerful Range Avoidance problem that has yielded many new interesting explicit circuit lower bounds.

Cite as

Karthik Gajulapalli, Zeyong Li, and Ilya Volkovich. Oblivious Complexity Classes Revisited: Lower Bounds and Hierarchies. In 44th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 323, pp. 23:1-23:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gajulapalli_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2024.23,
  author =	{Gajulapalli, Karthik and Li, Zeyong and Volkovich, Ilya},
  title =	{{Oblivious Complexity Classes Revisited: Lower Bounds and Hierarchies}},
  booktitle =	{44th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2024)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-355-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{323},
  editor =	{Barman, Siddharth and Lasota, S{\l}awomir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2024.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-222122},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2024.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: fixed circuit lower bounds, semantic time hierarchy, oblivious complexity, range avoidance}
}
Document
Towards Identity Testing for Sums of Products of Read-Once and Multilinear Bounded-Read Formulae

Authors: Pranav Bisht, Nikhil Gupta, and Ilya Volkovich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 284, 43rd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2023)


Abstract
An arithmetic formula is an arithmetic circuit where each gate has fan-out one. An arithmetic read-once formula (ROF in short) is an arithmetic formula where each input variable labels at most one leaf. In this paper we present several efficient blackbox polynomial identity testing (PIT) algorithms for some classes of polynomials related to read-once formulas. Namely, for polynomial of the form: - f = Φ_1 ⋅ … ⋅ Φ_m + Ψ₁ ⋅ … ⋅ Ψ_r, where Φ_i,Ψ_j are ROFs for every i ∈ [m], j ∈ [r]. - f = Φ_1^{e₁} + Φ₂^{e₂} + Φ₃^{e₃}, where each Φ_i is an ROF and e_i-s are arbitrary positive integers. Earlier, only a whitebox polynomial-time algorithm was known for the former class by Mahajan, Rao and Sreenivasaiah (Algorithmica 2016). In the same paper, they also posed an open problem to come up with an efficient PIT algorithm for the class of polynomials of the form f = Φ_1^{e₁} + Φ_2^{e₂} + … + Φ_k^{e_k}, where each Φ_i is an ROF and k is some constant. Our second result answers this partially by giving a polynomial-time algorithm when k = 3. More generally, when each Φ₁,Φ₂,Φ₃ is a multilinear bounded-read formulae, we also give a quasi-polynomial-time blackbox PIT algorithm. Our main technique relies on the hardness of representation approach introduced in Shpilka and Volkovich (Computational Complexity 2015). Specifically, we show hardness of representation for the resultant polynomial of two ROFs in our first result. For our second result, we lift hardness of representation for a sum of three ROFs to sum of their powers.

Cite as

Pranav Bisht, Nikhil Gupta, and Ilya Volkovich. Towards Identity Testing for Sums of Products of Read-Once and Multilinear Bounded-Read Formulae. In 43rd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 284, pp. 9:1-9:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bisht_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2023.9,
  author =	{Bisht, Pranav and Gupta, Nikhil and Volkovich, Ilya},
  title =	{{Towards Identity Testing for Sums of Products of Read-Once and Multilinear Bounded-Read Formulae}},
  booktitle =	{43rd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2023)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-304-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{284},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2023.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-193829},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2023.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Identity Testing, Derandomization, Bounded-Read Formulae, Arithmetic Formulas}
}
Document
RANDOM
Synergy Between Circuit Obfuscation and Circuit Minimization

Authors: Russell Impagliazzo, Valentine Kabanets, and Ilya Volkovich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 275, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023)


Abstract
We study close connections between Indistinguishability Obfuscation (IO) and the Minimum Circuit Size Problem (MCSP), and argue that efficient algorithms/construction for MCSP and IO create a synergy. Some of our main results are: - If there exists a perfect (imperfect) IO that is computationally secure against nonuniform polynomial-size circuits, then for all k ∈ ℕ: NP ∩ ZPP^{MCSP} ⊈ SIZE[n^k] (MA ∩ ZPP^{MCSP} ⊈ SIZE[n^k]). - In addition, if there exists a perfect IO that is computationally secure against nonuniform polynomial-size circuits, then NEXP ∩ ZPEXP^{MCSP} ⊈ P/poly. - If MCSP ∈ BPP, then statistical security and computational security for IO are equivalent. - If computationally-secure perfect IO exists, then MCSP ∈ BPP iff NP = ZPP. - If computationally-secure perfect IO exists, then ZPEXP ≠ BPP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first consequence of strong circuit lower bounds from the existence of an IO. The results are obtained via a construction of an optimal universal distinguisher, computable in randomized polynomial time with access to the MCSP oracle, that will distinguish any two circuit-samplable distributions with the advantage that is the statistical distance between these two distributions minus some negligible error term. This is our main technical contribution. As another immediate application, we get a simple proof of the result by Allender and Das (Inf. Comput., 2017) that SZK ⊆ BPP^{MCSP}.

Cite as

Russell Impagliazzo, Valentine Kabanets, and Ilya Volkovich. Synergy Between Circuit Obfuscation and Circuit Minimization. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 275, pp. 31:1-31:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{impagliazzo_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.31,
  author =	{Impagliazzo, Russell and Kabanets, Valentine and Volkovich, Ilya},
  title =	{{Synergy Between Circuit Obfuscation and Circuit Minimization}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-296-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{275},
  editor =	{Megow, Nicole and Smith, Adam},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-188569},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Minimal Circuit Size Problem (MCSP), Circuit Lower Bounds, Complexity Classes, Indistinguishability Obfuscation, Separation of Classes, Statistical Distance}
}
Document
Derandomization via Symmetric Polytopes: Poly-Time Factorization of Certain Sparse Polynomials

Authors: Pranav Bisht and Nitin Saxena

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 250, 42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022)


Abstract
More than three decades ago, after a series of results, Kaltofen and Trager (J. Symb. Comput. 1990) designed a randomized polynomial time algorithm for factorization of multivariate circuits. Derandomizing this algorithm, even for restricted circuit classes, is an important open problem. In particular, the case of s-sparse polynomials, having individual degree d = O(1), is very well-studied (Shpilka, Volkovich ICALP'10; Volkovich RANDOM'17; Bhargava, Saraf and Volkovich FOCS'18, JACM'20). We give a complete derandomization for this class assuming that the input is a symmetric polynomial over rationals. Generally, we prove an s^poly(d)-sparsity bound for the factors of symmetric polynomials over any field. This characterizes the known worst-case examples of sparsity blow-up for sparse polynomial factoring. To factor f, we use techniques from convex geometry and exploit symmetry (only) in the Newton polytope of f. We prove a crucial result about convex polytopes, by introducing the concept of "low min-entropy", which might also be of independent interest.

Cite as

Pranav Bisht and Nitin Saxena. Derandomization via Symmetric Polytopes: Poly-Time Factorization of Certain Sparse Polynomials. In 42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 250, pp. 9:1-9:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bisht_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.9,
  author =	{Bisht, Pranav and Saxena, Nitin},
  title =	{{Derandomization via Symmetric Polytopes: Poly-Time Factorization of Certain Sparse Polynomials}},
  booktitle =	{42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-261-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{250},
  editor =	{Dawar, Anuj and Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-174012},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Multivariate polynomial factorization, derandomization, sparse polynomials, symmetric polynomials, factor-sparsity, convex polytopes}
}
Document
On Solving Sparse Polynomial Factorization Related Problems

Authors: Pranav Bisht and Ilya Volkovich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 250, 42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022)


Abstract
In a recent result of Bhargava, Saraf and Volkovich [FOCS’18; JACM’20], the first factor sparsity bound for constant individual degree polynomials was shown. In particular, it was shown that any factor of a polynomial with at most s terms and individual degree bounded by d can itself have at most s^O(d²log n) terms. It is conjectured, though, that the "true" sparsity bound should be polynomial (i.e. s^poly(d)). In this paper we provide supporting evidence for this conjecture by presenting polynomial-time algorithms for several problems that would be implied by a polynomial-size sparsity bound. In particular, we give efficient (deterministic) algorithms for identity testing of Σ^[2]ΠΣΠ^[ind-deg d] circuits and testing if a sparse polynomial is an exact power. Hence, our algorithms rely on different techniques.

Cite as

Pranav Bisht and Ilya Volkovich. On Solving Sparse Polynomial Factorization Related Problems. In 42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 250, pp. 10:1-10:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bisht_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.10,
  author =	{Bisht, Pranav and Volkovich, Ilya},
  title =	{{On Solving Sparse Polynomial Factorization Related Problems}},
  booktitle =	{42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-261-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{250},
  editor =	{Dawar, Anuj and Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-174023},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sparse Polynomials, Identity Testing, Derandomization, Factor-Sparsity, Multivariate Polynomial Factorization}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 24 Document/PDF
  • 10 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 6 2026
  • 4 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 2 2023
  • 3 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 13 Volkovich, Ilya
  • 3 Bisht, Pranav
  • 3 Kabanets, Valentine
  • 2 Impagliazzo, Russell
  • 2 Ren, Hanlin
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 24 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 8 Theory of computation → Algebraic complexity theory
  • 7 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity
  • 6 Theory of computation → Pseudorandomness and derandomization
  • 5 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • 4 Theory of computation → Complexity classes
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 7 Derandomization
  • 3 Identity Testing
  • 3 Reconstruction
  • 2 Arithmetic Circuits
  • 2 Circuit Lower Bounds
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail