18 Search Results for "Sen, Koushik"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20
On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing

Authors: Federico Lochbaum and Guillermo Polito

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)

Abstract
Guaranteeing that a compiler behaves correctly is a complex task often approached through test generation and fuzzing. Compiler test generation must not only ensure that a compiler generates code that does not break, but also that it implements the programming language semantics. Recently, interpreter-guided test generation has been proposed to test JIT compilers: Concolic-execution on the interpreter yields test cases for the language semantics which are then validated between differential testing of the interpreter and compiler. In previous work, this solution has been shown to find interpreter/compiler differences. However, little has been said about the effectiveness and the solution limits. In this paper we study the behavior of this technique, to shed light on future improvements and research. We experiment with this technique on the JIT compiler for the Pharo programming language, on two different backends: ARMv7 and x86. We explore how effective the solution is in terms of compiler coverage and its limitations, and we discuss how future research can overcome them. Moreover, we investigate how this technique combined with random constraint mutations increases backend compiler coverage.
Cite as

Federico Lochbaum and Guillermo Polito. On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing. In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 20:1-20:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lochbaum_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.20,
  author =	{Lochbaum, Federico and Polito, Guillermo},
  title =	{{On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243040},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Virtual Machines, Concolic Testing, JIT compilers, interpreters, Differential Testing, Constraint Mutations, Compiler Coverage}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.13
Dimensions of Examples: Toward a Framework for Qualifying Examples in Programming

Authors: Toni Mattis, Lukas Böhme, Stefan Ramson, Tom Beckmann, Martin C. Rinard, and Robert Hirschfeld

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)

Abstract
Programming requires understanding, using, and changing abstract source code and other representations of programs. Concrete examples demonstrate a particular instance of their abstract behavior. Hence, they play an important role in program comprehension, specification, and testing of requirements. Authoring examples entails a range of - often implicit - decisions about the content and presentation of the example. In this work, we attempt to structure this decision space by describing a set of dimensions that characterize examples in programming. As the manual effort of creating examples is increasingly automated, e.g., through the use of generative AI, we expect this catalog of dimensions to help users and tool developers parametrize, guide, and evaluate the generation of examples in terms of the vocabulary we present here.
Cite as

Toni Mattis, Lukas Böhme, Stefan Ramson, Tom Beckmann, Martin C. Rinard, and Robert Hirschfeld. Dimensions of Examples: Toward a Framework for Qualifying Examples in Programming. In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 13:1-13:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mattis_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.13,
  author =	{Mattis, Toni and B\"{o}hme, Lukas and Ramson, Stefan and Beckmann, Tom and Rinard, Martin C. and Hirschfeld, Robert},
  title =	{{Dimensions of Examples: Toward a Framework for Qualifying Examples in Programming}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:11},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242973},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Examples, Live Programming, Evaluation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.4
Monitorability for the Modal Mu-Calculus over Systems with Data: From Practice to Theory

Authors: Luca Aceto, Antonis Achilleos, Duncan Paul Attard, Léo Exibard, Adrian Francalanza, Anna Ingólfsdóttir, and Karoliina Lehtinen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
Runtime verification consists in checking whether a system satisfies a given specification by observing the execution trace it produces. In the regular setting, the modal μ-calculus provides a versatile formalism for expressing specifications of the control flow of the system. This paper focuses on the data flow and studies an extension of that logic that allows it to express data-dependent properties, identifying fragments that can be verified at runtime and with what correctness guarantees. The logic studied here is closely related with register automata with guessing. That correspondence yields a monitor synthesis algorithm, and a strict hierarchy among the various fragments of the logic, in contrast to the regular setting. We then exhibit a fragment of the logic that can express all monitorable formulae in the logic without greatest fixed-points but not in the full logic, and show this is the best we can get.
Cite as

Luca Aceto, Antonis Achilleos, Duncan Paul Attard, Léo Exibard, Adrian Francalanza, Anna Ingólfsdóttir, and Karoliina Lehtinen. Monitorability for the Modal Mu-Calculus over Systems with Data: From Practice to Theory. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 4:1-4:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aceto_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.4,
  author =	{Aceto, Luca and Achilleos, Antonis and Attard, Duncan Paul and Exibard, L\'{e}o and Francalanza, Adrian and Ing\'{o}lfsd\'{o}ttir, Anna and Lehtinen, Karoliina},
  title =	{{Monitorability for the Modal Mu-Calculus over Systems with Data: From Practice to Theory}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239546},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Runtime verification, monitorability, \muHML with data, register automata}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.26
Optimal Concolic Dynamic Partial Order Reduction

Authors: Mohammad Hossein Khoshechin Jorshari, Michalis Kokologiannakis, Rupak Majumdar, and Srinidhi Nagendra

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
Stateless model checking (SMC) software implementations requires exploring both concurrency- and data nondeterminism. Unfortunately, most SMC algorithms focus on efficient exploration of concurrency nondeterminism, thereby neglecting an important source of bugs. We present ConDpor, an SMC algorithm for unmodified Java programs that combines optimal dynamic partial order reduction (DPOR) for concurrency nondeterminism, with concolic execution for data nondeterminism. ConDpor is sound, complete, optimal, and parametric w.r.t. the memory consistency model. Our experiments confirm that ConDpor is exponentially faster than DPOR with small-domain enumeration. Overall, ConDpor opens the door for efficient exploration of concurrent programs with data nondeterminism.
Cite as

Mohammad Hossein Khoshechin Jorshari, Michalis Kokologiannakis, Rupak Majumdar, and Srinidhi Nagendra. Optimal Concolic Dynamic Partial Order Reduction. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 26:1-26:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{khoshechinjorshari_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.26,
  author =	{Khoshechin Jorshari, Mohammad Hossein and Kokologiannakis, Michalis and Majumdar, Rupak and Nagendra, Srinidhi},
  title =	{{Optimal Concolic Dynamic Partial Order Reduction}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239765},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stateless model checking, dynamic symbolic execution}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35
Chain of Grounded Objectives: Concise Goal-Oriented Prompting for Code Generation

Authors: Sangyeop Yeo, Seung-Won Hwang, and Yu-Seung Ma

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation has gained significant attention in recent years. Existing methods often aim to improve the quality of generated code by incorporating additional contextual information or guidance into input prompts. Many of these approaches adopt process-oriented reasoning strategies, mimicking human-like step-by-step thinking; however, they may not always align with the structured nature of programming languages. This paper introduces Chain of Grounded Objectives (CGO), a concise goal-oriented prompting approach that embeds functional objectives into prompts to enhance code generation. By focusing on precisely defined objectives rather than explicit procedural steps, CGO aligns more naturally with programming tasks while retaining flexibility. Empirical evaluations on HumanEval, MBPP, their extended versions, and LiveCodeBench show that CGO achieves accuracy comparable to or better than existing methods while using fewer tokens, making it a more efficient approach to LLM-based code generation.
Cite as

Sangyeop Yeo, Seung-Won Hwang, and Yu-Seung Ma. Chain of Grounded Objectives: Concise Goal-Oriented Prompting for Code Generation. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 35:1-35:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yeo_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35,
  author =	{Yeo, Sangyeop and Hwang, Seung-Won and Ma, Yu-Seung},
  title =	{{Chain of Grounded Objectives: Concise Goal-Oriented Prompting for Code Generation}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233271},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Prompt Design, Large Language Models, Code Generation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12
Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq

Authors: Ali Ghanbari

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Proof engineering in Rocq is a labor-intensive process, and as proof developments grow in size, redundancy and maintainability become challenges. One such redundancy is goal cloning, i.e., proving α-equivalent goals multiple times, leading to wasted effort and bloated proof scripts. In this paper, we introduce clone-finder, a novel technique for detecting goal clones in Rocq proofs. By leveraging the formal notion of α-equivalence for Gallina terms, clone-finder systematically identifies duplicated proof goals across large Rocq codebases. We evaluate clone-finder on 40 real-world Rocq projects from the CoqGym dataset. Our results reveal that each project contains an average of 27.73 instances of goal clone. We observed that the clones can be categorized as either exact goal duplication, generalization, or α-equivalent goals with different proofs, each signifying varying levels duplicate effort. Our findings highlight significant untapped potential for proof reuse in Rocq-based formal verification projects, paving the way for future improvements in automated proof engineering.
Cite as

Ali Ghanbari. Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 12:1-12:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ghanbari:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12,
  author =	{Ghanbari, Ali},
  title =	{{Automatic Goal Clone Detection in Rocq}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233055},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Clone Detection, Goal, Proof, Rocq, Gallina}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.9
Event Race Detection for Node.js Using Delay Injections

Authors: Andre Takeshi Endo and Anders Møller

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Node.js is a widely used platform for building JavaScript server-side web applications, desktop applications, and software engineering tools. Its asynchronous execution model is essential for performance, but also gives rise to event races, which cause many subtle bugs that can be hard to detect and reproduce. Current solutions to expose such races are based on modifications of the source code of the Node.js system or on guided executions using complex happens-before modeling. This paper presents a simpler and more effective approach called NACD that works by dynamically instrumenting core asynchronous operations in the Node.js runtime system to inject delays and thereby reveal event race bugs. It consists of a small, robust runtime instrumentation module implemented in JavaScript that is configured by a flexible JSON model of the essential parts of the Node.js API. Experimental results show that NACD can reproduce event race bugs with higher probability and fewer runs than state-of-the-art tools.
Cite as

Andre Takeshi Endo and Anders Møller. Event Race Detection for Node.js Using Delay Injections. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 9:1-9:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{endo_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.9,
  author =	{Endo, Andre Takeshi and M{\o}ller, Anders},
  title =	{{Event Race Detection for Node.js  Using Delay Injections}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:28},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233026},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: JavaScript, race conditions, flaky tests, event races, callback interleaving}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.23
Wastrumentation: Portable WebAssembly Dynamic Analysis with Support for Intercession

Authors: Aäron Munsters, Angel Luis Scull Pupo, and Elisa Gonzalez Boix

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Dynamic program analyses help in understanding a program’s runtime behavior and detect issues related to security, program comprehension, or profiling. Instrumentation platforms aid analysis developers by offering a high-level API to write the analysis, and inserting the analysis into the target program. However, current instrumentation platforms for WebAssembly (Wasm) restrict analysis portability because they require concrete runtime environments. Moreover, their analysis API only allows the development of analyses that observe the target program but cannot modify it. As a result, many popular dynamic analyses present for other languages, such as runtime hardening, virtual patching or runtime optimization, cannot currently be implemented for Wasm atop a dynamic analysis platform. Instead, they need to be built manually, which requires knowledge of low-level details of the Wasm’s semantics and instruction set, and how to safely manipulate it. This paper introduces Wastrumentation, the first dynamic analysis platform for WebAssembly that supports intercession. Our solution, based on source code instrumentation, weaves the analysis code directly into the target program code. Inlining the analysis into the target’s source code avoids dependencies on the runtime environment, making analyses portable across Wasm VMs. Moreover, it enables the implementation of analyses in any Wasm-compatible language. We evaluate our solution in two ways. First, we compare it against a state-of-the-art source code instrumentation platform using the WasmR3 benchmarks. The results show improved memory consumption and competitive performance overhead. Second, we develop an extensive portfolio of dynamic analyses, including novel analyses previously unattainable with source code instrumentation platforms, such as memoization, safe heap access, and the removal of NaN non-determinism.
Cite as

Aäron Munsters, Angel Luis Scull Pupo, and Elisa Gonzalez Boix. Wastrumentation: Portable WebAssembly Dynamic Analysis with Support for Intercession. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 23:1-23:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{munsters_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.23,
  author =	{Munsters, A\"{a}ron and Scull Pupo, Angel Luis and Gonzalez Boix, Elisa},
  title =	{{Wastrumentation: Portable WebAssembly Dynamic Analysis with Support for Intercession}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233153},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: WebAssembly, dynamic analysis, instrumentation platform, intercession}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10
Bottom-Up Synthesis of Memory Mutations with Separation Logic

Authors: Kasra Ferdowsi and Hila Peleg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Programming-by-Example (PBE) is the paradigm of program synthesis specified via input-output pairs. It is commonly used because examples are easy to provide and collect from the environment. A popular optimization for enumerative synthesis with examples is Observational Equivalence (OE), which groups programs into equivalence classes according to their evaluation on example inputs. Current formulations of OE, however, are severely limited by the assumption that the synthesizer’s target language contains only pure components with no side-effects, either enforcing this in their target language, or ignoring it, leading to an incorrect enumeration. This limits their ability to use realistic component sets. We address this limitation by borrowing from Separation Logic, which can compositionally reason about heap mutations. We reformulate PBE using a restricted Separation Logic: Concrete Heap Separation Logic (CHSL), transforming the search for programs into a proof search in CHSL. This lets us perform bottom-up enumerative synthesis without the need for expert-provided annotations or domain-specific inferences, but with three key advantages: we (i) preserve correctness in the presence of memory-mutating operations, (ii) compact the search space by representing many concrete programs as one under CHSL, and (iii) perform a provably correct OE-reduction. We present SObEq (Side-effects in OBservational EQuivalence), a bottom-up enumerative algorithm that, given a PBE task, searches for its CHSL derivation. The SObEq algorithm is proved correct with no purity assumptions: we show it is guaranteed to lose no solutions. We also evaluate our implementation of SObEq on benchmarks from the literature and online sources, and show that it produces high-quality results quickly.
Cite as

Kasra Ferdowsi and Hila Peleg. Bottom-Up Synthesis of Memory Mutations with Separation Logic. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 10:1-10:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ferdowsi_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10,
  author =	{Ferdowsi, Kasra and Peleg, Hila},
  title =	{{Bottom-Up Synthesis of Memory Mutations with Separation Logic}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:32},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233036},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program synthesis, observational equivalence}
}
Document
Tool Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.13
A Benchmark Framework for Byzantine Fault Tolerance Testing Algorithms (Tool Paper)

Authors: João Miguel Louro Neto and Burcu Kulahcioglu Ozkan

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 129, 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)

Abstract
Recent discoveries of vulnerabilities in the design and implementation of Byzantine fault-tolerant protocols underscore the need for testing and exploration techniques to ensure their correctness. While there has been some recent effort for automated test generation for BFT protocols, there is no benchmark framework available to systematically evaluate their performance. We present ByzzBench, a benchmark framework designed to evaluate the performance of testing algorithms in detecting Byzantine fault tolerance bugs. ByzzBench is designed for a standardized implementation of BFT protocols and their execution in a controlled testing environment. It controls the nondeterminism in the concurrency, network, and process faults in the protocol execution, enabling the functionality to enforce particular execution scenarios and thereby facilitating the implementation of testing algorithms for BFT protocols.
Cite as

João Miguel Louro Neto and Burcu Kulahcioglu Ozkan. A Benchmark Framework for Byzantine Fault Tolerance Testing Algorithms (Tool Paper). In 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 129, pp. 13:1-13:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{louroneto_et_al:OASIcs.FMBC.2025.13,
  author =	{Louro Neto, Jo\~{a}o Miguel and Kulahcioglu Ozkan, Burcu},
  title =	{{A Benchmark Framework for Byzantine Fault Tolerance Testing Algorithms}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:11},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-371-3},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{129},
  editor =	{Marmsoler, Diego and Xu, Meng},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230406},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Byzantine Fault Tolerance, BFT Protocols, Automated Testing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES.10.1.1
GDBMiner: Mining Precise Input Grammars on (Almost) Any System

Authors: Max Eisele, Johannes Hägele, Christopher Huth, and Andreas Zeller

Published in: LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract
If one knows the input language of the system to be tested, one can generate inputs in a very efficient manner. Grammar-based fuzzers, for instance, produce inputs that are syntactically valid by construction. They are thus much more likely to be accepted by the program under test and to reach code beyond the input parser. Grammar-based fuzzers, however, need a grammar in the first place. Grammar miners are set to extract such grammars from programs. However, current grammar mining tools place huge demands on the source code they are applied on, or are too imprecise, both preventing adoption in industrial practice. We present GDBMiner, a tool to mine input grammars for binaries and executables in any (compiled) programming language, on any operating system, using any processor architecture, even without source code. GDBMiner leverages the GNU debugger (GDB) to step through the program and determine which code locations access which input bytes, generalizing bytes accessed by the same location into grammar elements. GDBMiner is slow, but versatile - and precise: In our evaluation, GDBMiner produces grammars as precise as the (more demanding) Cmimid tool, while producing more precise grammars than the (less demanding) Arvada black-box approach. GDBMiner can be applied on any recursive descent parser that can be debugged via GDB and is available as open source.
Cite as

Max Eisele, Johannes Hägele, Christopher Huth, and Andreas Zeller. GDBMiner: Mining Precise Input Grammars on (Almost) Any System. In LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 1:1-1:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{eisele_et_al:LITES.10.1.1,
  author =	{Eisele, Max and H\"{a}gele, Johannes and Huth, Christopher and Zeller, Andreas},
  title =	{{GDBMiner: Mining Precise Input Grammars on (Almost) Any System}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{1:1--1:26},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES.10.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230134},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES.10.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: program analysis, testing, input grammar, fuzzing, grammar mining}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.PARMA-DITAM.2025.2
Custom Floating-Point Computations for the Optimization of ODE Solvers on FPGA

Authors: Serena Curzel and Marco Gribaudo

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 127, 16th Workshop on Parallel Programming and Run-Time Management Techniques for Many-Core Architectures and 14th Workshop on Design Tools and Architectures for Multicore Embedded Computing Platforms (PARMA-DITAM 2025)

Abstract
Mean Field Analysis and Markovian Agents are powerful techniques for modeling complex systems of distributed interacting objects, for which efficient analytical and numerical solution algorithms can be implemented through linear systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Solving such ODE systems on Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) is a promising alternative to traditional CPU- and GPU-based approaches, especially in terms of energy consumption; however, the floating-point computations required are generally thought to be slow and inefficient when implemented on FPGA. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of High-Level Synthesis with automated customization of low-precision floating-point calculations, obtaining hardware accelerators for ODE solvers with improved quality of results and minimal output error. The proposed methodology does not require any manual rewriting of the solver code, but it remains prohibitively slow to evaluate any possible floating-point configuration through logic synthesis; in the future, we will thus implement automated design space exploration methods able to suggest promising configurations under user-defined accuracy and performance constraints.
Cite as

Serena Curzel and Marco Gribaudo. Custom Floating-Point Computations for the Optimization of ODE Solvers on FPGA. In 16th Workshop on Parallel Programming and Run-Time Management Techniques for Many-Core Architectures and 14th Workshop on Design Tools and Architectures for Multicore Embedded Computing Platforms (PARMA-DITAM 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 127, pp. 2:1-2:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{curzel_et_al:OASIcs.PARMA-DITAM.2025.2,
  author =	{Curzel, Serena and Gribaudo, Marco},
  title =	{{Custom Floating-Point Computations for the Optimization of ODE Solvers on FPGA}},
  booktitle =	{16th Workshop on Parallel Programming and Run-Time Management Techniques for Many-Core Architectures and 14th Workshop on Design Tools and Architectures for Multicore Embedded Computing Platforms (PARMA-DITAM 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:13},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-363-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{127},
  editor =	{Cattaneo, Daniele and Fazio, Maria and Kosmidis, Leonidas and Morabito, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.PARMA-DITAM.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-229064},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.PARMA-DITAM.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Equations, High-Level Synthesis, FPGA, floating-point}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.7
Abstract Interpretation, Symbolic Execution and Constraints

Authors: Roberto Amadini, Graeme Gange, Peter Schachte, Harald Søndergaard, and Peter J. Stuckey

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 86, Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages (2020)

Abstract
Abstract interpretation is a static analysis framework for sound over-approximation of all possible runtime states of a program. Symbolic execution is a framework for reachability analysis which tries to explore all possible execution paths of a program. A shared feature between abstract interpretation and symbolic execution is that each - implicitly or explicitly - maintains constraints during execution, in the form of invariants or path conditions. We investigate the relations between the worlds of abstract interpretation, symbolic execution and constraint solving, to expose potential synergies.
Cite as

Roberto Amadini, Graeme Gange, Peter Schachte, Harald Søndergaard, and Peter J. Stuckey. Abstract Interpretation, Symbolic Execution and Constraints. In Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages. Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 86, pp. 7:1-7:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amadini_et_al:OASIcs.Gabbrielli.7,
  author =	{Amadini, Roberto and Gange, Graeme and Schachte, Peter and S{\o}ndergaard, Harald and Stuckey, Peter J.},
  title =	{{Abstract Interpretation, Symbolic Execution and Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages},
  pages =	{7:1--7:19},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-171-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{86},
  editor =	{de Boer, Frank S. and Mauro, Jacopo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-132294},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Abstract interpretation, symbolic execution, constraint solving, dynamic analysis, static analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.10
Inseguendo Fagiani Selvatici: Partial Order Reduction for Guarded Command Languages

Authors: Frank S. de Boer, Einar Broch Johnsen, Rudolf Schlatte, Silvia Lizeth Tapia Tarifa, and Lars Tveito

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 86, Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages (2020)

Abstract
This paper presents a method for testing whether objects in actor languages and active object languages exhibit locally deterministic behavior. We investigate such a method for a class of guarded command programs, abstracting from object-oriented features like method calls but focusing on cooperative scheduling of dynamically spawned processes executing in parallel. The proposed method can answer questions such as whether all permutations of an execution trace are equivalent, by generating candidate traces for testing which may lead to different final states. To prune the set of candidate traces, we employ partial order reduction. To further reduce the set, we introduce an analysis technique to decide whether a generated trace is schedulable. Schedulability cannot be decided for guarded commands using standard dependence and interference relations because guard enabledness is non-monotonic. To solve this problem, we use concolic execution to produce linearized symbolic traces of the executed program, which allows a weakest precondition computation to decide on the satisfiability of guards.
Cite as

Frank S. de Boer, Einar Broch Johnsen, Rudolf Schlatte, Silvia Lizeth Tapia Tarifa, and Lars Tveito. Inseguendo Fagiani Selvatici: Partial Order Reduction for Guarded Command Languages. In Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages. Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 86, pp. 10:1-10:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deboer_et_al:OASIcs.Gabbrielli.10,
  author =	{de Boer, Frank S. and Johnsen, Einar Broch and Schlatte, Rudolf and Tapia Tarifa, Silvia Lizeth and Tveito, Lars},
  title =	{{Inseguendo Fagiani Selvatici: Partial Order Reduction for Guarded Command Languages}},
  booktitle =	{Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages},
  pages =	{10:1--10:18},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-171-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{86},
  editor =	{de Boer, Frank S. and Mauro, Jacopo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-132322},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Testing, Symbolic Traces, Guarded Commands, Partial Order Reduction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES-v004-i001-a003
Quantitative Analysis of Consistency in NoSQL Key-Value Stores

Authors: Si Liu, Jatin Ganhotra, Muntasir Raihan Rahman, Son Nguyen, Indranil Gupta, and José Meseguer

Published in: LITES, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2017). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 4, Issue 1

Abstract
The promise of high scalability and availability has prompted many companies to replace traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) with NoSQL key-value stores. This comes at the cost of relaxed consistency guarantees: key-value stores only guarantee eventual consistency in principle. In practice, however, many key-value stores seem to offer stronger consistency. Quantifying how well consistency properties are met is a non-trivial problem.  We address this problem by formally modeling key-value stores as probabilistic systems and quantitatively analyzing their consistency properties by both statistical model checking and implementation evaluation. We present for the first time a formal probabilistic model of Apache Cassandra, a popular NoSQL key-value store, and quantify how much Cassandra achieves various consistency guarantees under various conditions. To validate our model, we evaluate multiple consistency properties using two methods and compare them against each other. The two methods are: (1) an implementation-based evaluation of the source code; and (2) a statistical model checking analysis of our probabilistic model.
Cite as

Si Liu, Jatin Ganhotra, Muntasir Raihan Rahman, Son Nguyen, Indranil Gupta, and José Meseguer. Quantitative Analysis of Consistency in NoSQL Key-Value Stores. In LITES, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2017). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 03:1-03:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{liu_et_al:LITES-v004-i001-a003,
  author =	{Liu, Si and Ganhotra, Jatin and Rahman, Muntasir Raihan and Nguyen, Son and Gupta, Indranil and Meseguer, Jos\'{e}},
  title =	{{Quantitative Analysis of Consistency in NoSQL Key-Value Stores}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{03:1--03:26},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{4},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES-v004-i001-a003},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-192649},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES-v004-i001-a003},
  annote =	{Keywords: NoSQL Key-value Store, Consistency, Statistical Model Checking, Rewriting Logic, Maude}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 18 Document/PDF
  • 12 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 12 2025
  • 2 2020
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2016
  • 2 2015

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Sen, Koushik
  • 1 Aceto, Luca
  • 1 Achilleos, Antonis
  • 1 Amadini, Roberto
  • 1 Andreasen, Esben
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 9 LIPIcs
  • 6 OASIcs
  • 2 LITES
  • 1 DagRep

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Software maintenance tools
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Architectures
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Cloud computing
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Embedded software
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 JavaScript
  • 2 dynamic analysis
  • 1 Abstract interpretation
  • 1 Artificial Intelligence
  • 1 Automated Program Analysis
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact