16 Search Results for "Sternagel, Christian"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3
A Formal Proof of Complexity Bounds on Diophantine Equations

Authors: Jonas Bayer and Marco David

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We present a universal construction of Diophantine equations with bounded complexity in Isabelle/HOL. This is a formalization of our own work in number theory [Jonas Bayer et al., 2025]. Hilbert’s Tenth Problem was answered negatively by Yuri Matiyasevich, who showed that there is no general algorithm to decide whether an arbitrary Diophantine equation has a solution. However, the problem remains open when generalized to the field of rational numbers, or contrarily, when restricted to Diophantine equations with bounded complexity, characterized by the number of variables ν and the degree δ. If every Diophantine set can be represented within the bounds (ν, δ), we say that this pair is universal, and it follows that the corresponding class of equations is undecidable. In a separate mathematics article, we have determined the first non-trivial universal pair for the case of integer unknowns. In this paper, we contribute a formal verification of this new result. In doing so, we markedly extend the Isabelle AFP entry on multivariate polynomials [Christian Sternagel et al., 2010], formalize parts of a number theory textbook [Melvyn B. Nathanson, 1996], and develop classical theory on Diophantine equations [Yuri Matiyasevich and Julia Robinson, 1975] in Isabelle. In addition, our work includes metaprogramming infrastructure designed to efficiently handle complex definitions of multivariate polynomials. Our mathematical draft has been formalized while the mathematical research was ongoing, and benefited largely from the help of the theorem prover. We reflect on how the close collaboration between mathematician and computer is an uncommon but promising modus operandi.
Cite as

Jonas Bayer and Marco David. A Formal Proof of Complexity Bounds on Diophantine Equations. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bayer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3,
  author =	{Bayer, Jonas and David, Marco},
  title =	{{A Formal Proof of Complexity Bounds on Diophantine Equations}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246023},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Diophantine Equations, Hilbert’s Tenth Problem, Isabelle/HOL}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.2
A Formal Analysis of Algorithms for Matroids and Greedoids

Authors: Mohammad Abdulaziz, Thomas Ammer, Shriya Meenakshisundaram, and Adem Rimpapa

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We present a formal analysis, in Isabelle/HOL, of optimisation algorithms for matroids, which are useful generalisations of combinatorial structures that occur in optimisation, and greedoids, which are a generalisation of matroids. Although some formalisation work has been done earlier on matroids, our work here presents the first formalisation of results on greedoids, and many results we formalise in relation to matroids are also formalised for the first time in this work. We formalise the analysis of a number of optimisation algorithms for matroids and greedoids. We also derive from those algorithms executable implementations of Kruskal’s algorithm for computing optimal spanning trees, an algorithm for maximum cardinality matching for bi-partite graphs, and Prim’s algorithm for computing minimum weight spanning trees.
Cite as

Mohammad Abdulaziz, Thomas Ammer, Shriya Meenakshisundaram, and Adem Rimpapa. A Formal Analysis of Algorithms for Matroids and Greedoids. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 2:1-2:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{abdulaziz_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.2,
  author =	{Abdulaziz, Mohammad and Ammer, Thomas and Meenakshisundaram, Shriya and Rimpapa, Adem},
  title =	{{A Formal Analysis of Algorithms for Matroids and Greedoids}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246012},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Matroids, Greedoids, Combinatorial Optimisation, Graph Algorithms, Isabelle/HOL, Formal Verification}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13
Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized

Authors: Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Barendregt’s book on the untyped λ-calculus refines the inconsistent view of β-divergence as representation of the undefined via the key concept of head reduction. In this paper, we put together recent revisitations of some key theorems laid out in Barendregt’s book, and we formalize them in the Abella proof assistant. Our work provides a compact and refreshed presentation of the core of the book. The formalization faithfully mimics pen-and-paper proofs. Two interesting aspects are the manipulation of contexts for the study of contextual equivalence and a formal alternative to the informal trick at work in Takahashi’s proof of the genericity lemma. As a by-product, we obtain an alternative definition of contextual equivalence that does not mention contexts.
Cite as

Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs. Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 13:1-13:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lancelot_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13,
  author =	{Lancelot, Adrienne and Accattoli, Beniamino and Vemclefs, Maxime},
  title =	{{Barendregt’s Theory of the \lambda-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246114},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, head reduction, equational theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10
An Isabelle/HOL Formalization of Semi-Thue and Conditional Semi-Thue Systems

Authors: Dohan Kim

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We present a formalized framework for semi-Thue and conditional semi-Thue systems for studying monoids and their word problem using the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant. We provide a formalized decision procedure for the word problem of monoids if they are finitely presented by complete semi-Thue systems. In particular, we present a new formalized method for checking confluence using (conditional) critical pairs for certain conditional semi-Thue systems. We propose and formalize an inference system for generating conditional equational theories and Thue congruences using conditional semi-Thue systems. Then we provide a new formalized decision procedure for the word problem of monoids which have finite complete (reductive) conditional presentations.
Cite as

Dohan Kim. An Isabelle/HOL Formalization of Semi-Thue and Conditional Semi-Thue Systems. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 10:1-10:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kim:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10,
  author =	{Kim, Dohan},
  title =	{{An Isabelle/HOL Formalization of Semi-Thue and Conditional Semi-Thue Systems}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246081},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: semi-Thue systems, conditional semi-Thue systems, conditional string rewriting, monoids, word problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.76
Deciding Termination of Simple Randomized Loops

Authors: Éléanore Meyer and Jürgen Giesl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 345, 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)

Abstract
We show that universal positive almost sure termination (UPAST) is decidable for a class of simple randomized programs, i.e., it is decidable whether the expected runtime of such a program is finite for all inputs. Our class contains all programs that consist of a single loop, with a linear loop guard and a loop body composed of two linear commuting and diagonalizable updates. In each iteration of the loop, the update to be carried out is picked at random, according to a fixed probability. We show the decidability of UPAST for this class of programs, where the program’s variables and inputs may range over various sub-semirings of the real numbers. In this way, we extend a line of research initiated by Tiwari in 2004 into the realm of randomized programs.
Cite as

Éléanore Meyer and Jürgen Giesl. Deciding Termination of Simple Randomized Loops. In 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 345, pp. 76:1-76:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{meyer_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.76,
  author =	{Meyer, \'{E}l\'{e}anore and Giesl, J\"{u}rgen},
  title =	{{Deciding Termination of Simple Randomized Loops}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)},
  pages =	{76:1--76:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-388-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{345},
  editor =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Mazowiecki, Filip and Skrzypczak, Micha{\l}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.76},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-241833},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.76},
  annote =	{Keywords: decision procedures, randomized programs, linear loops, positive almost sure termination}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.6
Weighted Rewriting: Semiring Semantics for Abstract Reduction Systems

Authors: Emma Ahrens, Jan-Christoph Kassing, Jürgen Giesl, and Joost-Pieter Katoen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We present novel semiring semantics for abstract reduction systems (ARSs). More precisely, we provide a weighted version of ARSs, where the reduction steps induce weights from a semiring. Inspired by provenance analysis in database theory and logic, we obtain a formalism that can be used for provenance analysis of arbitrary ARSs. Our semantics handle (possibly unbounded) non-determinism and possibly infinite reductions. Moreover, we develop several techniques to prove upper and lower bounds on the weights resulting from our semantics, and show that in this way one obtains a uniform approach to analyze several different properties like termination, derivational complexity, space complexity, safety, as well as combinations of these properties.
Cite as

Emma Ahrens, Jan-Christoph Kassing, Jürgen Giesl, and Joost-Pieter Katoen. Weighted Rewriting: Semiring Semantics for Abstract Reduction Systems. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 6:1-6:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ahrens_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.6,
  author =	{Ahrens, Emma and Kassing, Jan-Christoph and Giesl, J\"{u}rgen and Katoen, Joost-Pieter},
  title =	{{Weighted Rewriting: Semiring Semantics for Abstract Reduction Systems}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236215},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Rewriting, Semirings, Semantics, Termination, Verification}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.25
Completeness of the Decreasing Diagrams Method for Proving Confluence of Rewriting Systems of the Least Uncountable Cardinality

Authors: Ievgen Ivanov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We show that every confluent abstract rewriting system (ARS) of the cardinality that does not exceed the first uncountable cardinal belongs to the class DCR₃, i.e. the class of confluent ARS for which confluence can be proved with the the help of the decreasing diagrams method using the set of labels {0,1,2} ordered in such a way that 0<1<2 (in the general case, the decreasing diagrams method with two labels is not sufficient for proving confluence of such ARS). Under the Continuum Hypothesis this result implies that the decreasing diagrams method is sufficient for establishing confluence of ARS on many structures of interest to applied mathematics and various interdisciplinary fields (confluence of ARS on real numbers, continuous real functions, etc.). We provide a machine-checked formal proof of a formalized version of the main result in Isabelle proof assistant using HOL logic and the HOL-Cardinals theory. An extended version of this formalization is available in the Archive of Formal Proofs.
Cite as

Ievgen Ivanov. Completeness of the Decreasing Diagrams Method for Proving Confluence of Rewriting Systems of the Least Uncountable Cardinality. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 25:1-25:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ivanov:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.25,
  author =	{Ivanov, Ievgen},
  title =	{{Completeness of the Decreasing Diagrams Method for Proving Confluence of Rewriting Systems of the Least Uncountable Cardinality}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236404},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: confluence, decreasing diagrams method, rewriting systems, reduction, formal methods, formal proofs, formal verification, non-discrete models, nondeterministic models, interval models}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.24
Z; Syntax-Free Developments

Authors: Vincent van Oostrom

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 195, 6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021)

Abstract
We present the Z-property and instantiate it to various rewrite systems: associativity, positive braids, self-distributivity, the lambda-calculus, lambda-calculi with explicit substitutions, orthogonal TRSs, .... The Z-property is proven equivalent to Takahashi’s angle property by means of a syntax-free notion of development. We show that several classical consequences of having developments such as confluence, normalisation, and recurrence, can be regained in a syntax-free way, and investigate how the notion corresponds to the classical syntactic notion of development in term rewriting.
Cite as

Vincent van Oostrom. Z; Syntax-Free Developments. In 6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 195, pp. 24:1-24:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vanoostrom:LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.24,
  author =	{van Oostrom, Vincent},
  title =	{{Z; Syntax-Free Developments}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-191-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{195},
  editor =	{Kobayashi, Naoki},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-142620},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: rewrite system, confluence, normalisation, recurrence}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.4
Certifying the Weighted Path Order (Invited Talk)

Authors: René Thiemann, Jonas Schöpf, Christian Sternagel, and Akihisa Yamada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)

Abstract
The weighted path order (WPO) unifies and extends several termination proving techniques that are known in term rewriting. Consequently, the first tool implementing WPO could prove termination of rewrite systems for which all previous tools failed. However, we should not blindly trust such results, since there might be problems with the implementation or the paper proof of WPO. In this work, we increase the reliability of these automatically generated proofs. To this end, we first formally prove the properties of WPO in Isabelle/HOL, and then develop a verified algorithm to certify termination proofs that are generated by tools using WPO. We also include support for max-polynomial interpretations, an important ingredient in WPO. Here we establish a connection to an existing verified SMT solver. Moreover, we extend the termination tools NaTT and TTT2, so that they can now generate certifiable WPO proofs.
Cite as

René Thiemann, Jonas Schöpf, Christian Sternagel, and Akihisa Yamada. Certifying the Weighted Path Order (Invited Talk). In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 4:1-4:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{thiemann_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.4,
  author =	{Thiemann, Ren\'{e} and Sch\"{o}pf, Jonas and Sternagel, Christian and Yamada, Akihisa},
  title =	{{Certifying the Weighted Path Order}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123263},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: certification, Isabelle/HOL, reduction order, termination analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.19
Infinite Runs in Abstract Completion

Authors: Nao Hirokawa, Aart Middeldorp, Christian Sternagel, and Sarah Winkler

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 84, 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)

Abstract
Completion is one of the first and most studied techniques in term rewriting and fundamental to automated reasoning with equalities. In an earlier paper we presented a new and formalized correctness proof of abstract completion for finite runs. In this paper we extend our analysis and our formalization to infinite runs, resulting in a new proof that fair infinite runs produce complete presentations of the initial equations. We further consider ordered completion - an important extension of completion that aims to produce ground-complete presentations of the initial equations. Moreover, we revisit and extend results of Métivier concerning canonicity of rewrite systems. All proofs presented in the paper have been formalized in Isabelle/HOL.
Cite as

Nao Hirokawa, Aart Middeldorp, Christian Sternagel, and Sarah Winkler. Infinite Runs in Abstract Completion. In 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 84, pp. 19:1-19:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hirokawa_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.19,
  author =	{Hirokawa, Nao and Middeldorp, Aart and Sternagel, Christian and Winkler, Sarah},
  title =	{{Infinite Runs in Abstract Completion}},
  booktitle =	{2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-047-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{84},
  editor =	{Miller, Dale},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-77252},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: term rewriting, abstract completion, ordered completion, canonicity, Isabelle/HOL}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.8
AC Dependency Pairs Revisited

Authors: Akihisa Yamada, Christian Sternagel, René Thiemann, and Keiichirou Kusakari

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 62, 25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016)

Abstract
Rewriting modulo AC, i.e., associativity and/or commutativity of certain symbols, is among the most frequently used extensions of term rewriting by equational theories. In this paper we present a generalization of the dependency pair framework for termination analysis to rewriting modulo AC. It subsumes existing variants of AC dependency pairs, admits standard dependency graph analyses, and in particular enjoys the minimality property in the standard sense. As a direct benefit, important termination techniques are easily extended; we describe usable rules and the subterm criterion for AC termination, which properly generalize the non-AC versions. We also perform these extensions within IsaFoR - the Isabelle formalization of rewriting - and thereby provide the first formalization of AC dependency pairs. Consequently, our certifier CeTA now supports checking proofs of AC termination.
Cite as

Akihisa Yamada, Christian Sternagel, René Thiemann, and Keiichirou Kusakari. AC Dependency Pairs Revisited. In 25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 62, pp. 8:1-8:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yamada_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2016.8,
  author =	{Yamada, Akihisa and Sternagel, Christian and Thiemann, Ren\'{e} and Kusakari, Keiichirou},
  title =	{{AC Dependency Pairs Revisited}},
  booktitle =	{25th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2016)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-022-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{62},
  editor =	{Talbot, Jean-Marc and Regnier, Laurent},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-65488},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2016.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Equational Rewriting, Termination, Dependency Pairs, Certification}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.29
Certifying Confluence of Almost Orthogonal CTRSs via Exact Tree Automata Completion

Authors: Christian Sternagel and Thomas Sternagel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 52, 1st International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2016)

Abstract
Suzuki et al. showed that properly oriented, right-stable, orthogonal, and oriented conditional term rewrite systems with extra variables in right-hand sides are confluent. We present our Isabelle/HOL formalization of this result, including two generalizations. On the one hand, we relax proper orientedness and orthogonality to extended proper orientedness and almost orthogonality modulo infeasibility, as suggested by Suzuki et al. On the other hand, we further loosen the requirements of the latter, enabling more powerful methods for proving infeasibility of conditional critical pairs. Furthermore, we formalized a construction by Jacquemard that employs exact tree automata completion for non-reachability analysis and apply it to certify infeasibility of conditional critical pairs. Combining these two results and extending the conditional confluence checker ConCon accordingly, we are able to automatically prove and certify confluence of an important class of conditional term rewrite systems.
Cite as

Christian Sternagel and Thomas Sternagel. Certifying Confluence of Almost Orthogonal CTRSs via Exact Tree Automata Completion. In 1st International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 52, pp. 29:1-29:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sternagel_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.29,
  author =	{Sternagel, Christian and Sternagel, Thomas},
  title =	{{Certifying Confluence of Almost Orthogonal CTRSs via Exact Tree Automata Completion}},
  booktitle =	{1st International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2016)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-010-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{52},
  editor =	{Kesner, Delia and Pientka, Brigitte},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-59996},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: certification, conditional term rewriting, confluence, infeasible critical pairs, non-reachability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2015.23
Certification of Complexity Proofs using CeTA

Authors: Martin Avanzini, Christian Sternagel, and René Thiemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 36, 26th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2015)

Abstract
Nowadays certification is widely employed by automated termination tools for term rewriting, where certifiers support most available techniques. In complexity analysis, the situation is quite different. Although tools support certification in principle, current certifiers implement only the most basic technique, namely, suitably tamed versions of reduction orders. As a consequence, only a small fraction of the proofs generated by state-of-the-art complexity tools can be certified. To improve upon this situation, we formalized a framework for the certification of modular complexity proofs and incorporated it into CeTA. We report on this extension and present the newly supported techniques (match-bounds, weak dependency pairs, dependency tuples, usable rules, and usable replacement maps), resulting in a significant increase in the number of certifiable complexity proofs. During our work we detected conflicts in theoretical results as well as bugs in existing complexity tools.
Cite as

Martin Avanzini, Christian Sternagel, and René Thiemann. Certification of Complexity Proofs using CeTA. In 26th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 36, pp. 23-39, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{avanzini_et_al:LIPIcs.RTA.2015.23,
  author =	{Avanzini, Martin and Sternagel, Christian and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  title =	{{Certification of Complexity Proofs using CeTA}},
  booktitle =	{26th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2015)},
  pages =	{23--39},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-85-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{36},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2015.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-51875},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2015.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: complexity analysis, certification, match-bounds, weak dependency pairs, dependency tuples, usable rules, usable replacement maps}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2013.287
Formalizing Knuth-Bendix Orders and Knuth-Bendix Completion

Authors: Christian Sternagel and René Thiemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 21, 24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2013)

Abstract
We present extensions of our Isabelle Formalization of Rewriting that cover two historically related concepts: the Knuth-Bendix order and the Knuth-Bendix completion procedure. The former, besides being the first development of its kind in a proof assistant, is based on a generalized version of the Knuth-Bendix order. We compare our version to variants from the literature and show all properties required to certify termination proofs of TRSs. The latter comprises the formalization of important facts that are related to completion, like Birkhoff's theorem, the critical pair theorem, and a soundness proof of completion, showing that the strict encompassment condition is superfluous for finite runs. As a result, we are able to certify completion proofs.
Cite as

Christian Sternagel and René Thiemann. Formalizing Knuth-Bendix Orders and Knuth-Bendix Completion. In 24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 21, pp. 287-302, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sternagel_et_al:LIPIcs.RTA.2013.287,
  author =	{Sternagel, Christian and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  title =	{{Formalizing Knuth-Bendix Orders and Knuth-Bendix Completion}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2013)},
  pages =	{287--302},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-53-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{21},
  editor =	{van Raamsdonk, Femke},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2013.287},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-40685},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2013.287},
  annote =	{Keywords: certification, completion, confluence, termination}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2011.329
Modular and Certified Semantic Labeling and Unlabeling

Authors: Christian Sternagel and René Thiemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 10, 22nd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA'11) (2011)

Abstract
Semantic labeling is a powerful transformation technique to prove termination of term rewrite systems. The dual technique is unlabeling. For unlabeling it is essential to drop the so called decreasing rules which sometimes have to be added when applying semantic labeling. We indicate two problems concerning unlabeling and present our solutions. The first problem is that currently unlabeling cannot be applied as a modular step, since the decreasing rules are determined by a semantic labeling step which may have taken place much earlier. To this end, we give an implicit definition of decreasing rules that does not depend on any knowledge about preceding labelings. The second problem is that unlabeling is in general unsound. To solve this issue, we introduce the notion of extended termination problems. Moreover, we show how existing termination techniques can be lifted to operate on extended termination problems. All our proofs have been formalized in Isabelle/HOL as part of the IsaFoR/CeTA project.
Cite as

Christian Sternagel and René Thiemann. Modular and Certified Semantic Labeling and Unlabeling. In 22nd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA'11). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 10, pp. 329-344, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2011)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sternagel_et_al:LIPIcs.RTA.2011.329,
  author =	{Sternagel, Christian and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  title =	{{Modular and Certified Semantic Labeling and Unlabeling}},
  booktitle =	{22nd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA'11)},
  pages =	{329--344},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-30-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2011},
  volume =	{10},
  editor =	{Schmidt-Schauss, Manfred},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2011.329},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-31333},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2011.329},
  annote =	{Keywords: semantic labeling, certification, term rewriting, unlabeling}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 16 Document/PDF
  • 7 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 7 2025
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2017
  • 2 2016
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 8 Sternagel, Christian
  • 6 Thiemann, René
  • 2 Giesl, Jürgen
  • 2 Yamada, Akihisa
  • 1 Abdulaziz, Mohammad
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 16 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Equational logic and rewriting
  • 5 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Discrete optimization
  • 1 Theory of computation → Invariants
  • 1 Theory of computation → Lambda calculus
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 certification
  • 4 Isabelle/HOL
  • 4 confluence
  • 3 Termination
  • 2 Certification
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact