12 Search Results for "Upadhyay, Jalaj"

Document
Extended Abstract
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.5
Normalized Square Root: Sharper Matrix Factorization Bounds for Differentially Private Continual Counting (Extended Abstract)

Authors: Monika Henzinger, Nikita Kalinin, and Jalaj Upadhyay

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
The factorization norms of the lower-triangular all-ones n× n matrix, γ₂(M_{count}) and γ_{F}(M_{count}), play a central role in differential privacy as they are used to give theoretical justification of the accuracy of the only known production-level private training algorithm of deep neural networks by Google. Prior to this work, the best known upper bound on γ₂(M_{count}) was 1 + (log(n))/π by Mathias (Linear Algebra and Applications, 1993), and the best known lower bound was 1/π (2 + log((2n+1)/3)) ≈ 0.507 + (log(n))/π (Matoušek, Nikolov, Talwar, IMRN 2020), where log(⋅) is the natural logarithm. Recently, Henzinger and Upadhyay (SODA 2025) gave the first explicit factorization that meets the bound of Mathias (1993) and asked whether there exists an explicit factorization that improves on Mathias’ bound. We answer this question in the affirmative. Additionally, we improve the lower bound significantly. More specifically, we show that o(1) + 0.701 + (log(n))/π ≤ γ₂(M_{count}) ≤ 0.846 + (log(n))/π + o(1). That is, we reduce the gap between the upper and lower bound to 0.14 + o(1) and first improvement in over three decades. Additionally, we show that our factors achieve a better upper bound for γ_{F}(M_{count}) compared to prior work, and we also establish an improved lower bound for γ_{F}(M_{count}): o(1) + 0.701 + (log(n))/π ≤ γ_{F}(M_{count}) ≤ 0.748 + (log(n))/π + o(1). That is, the gap between the lower and upper bound provided by our explicit factorization is 0.047 + o(1).
Cite as

Monika Henzinger, Nikita Kalinin, and Jalaj Upadhyay. Normalized Square Root: Sharper Matrix Factorization Bounds for Differentially Private Continual Counting (Extended Abstract). In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, p. 5:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{henzinger_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.5,
  author =	{Henzinger, Monika and Kalinin, Nikita and Upadhyay, Jalaj},
  title =	{{Normalized Square Root: Sharper Matrix Factorization Bounds for Differentially Private Continual Counting}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259767},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, continual release, factorization norm}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.2
Learning Rate Scheduling with Matrix Factorization for Private Training

Authors: Nikita P. Kalinin and Joel Daniel Andersson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
We study differentially private model training with stochastic gradient descent under learning rate scheduling and correlated noise. Although correlated noise, in particular via matrix factorizations, has been shown to improve accuracy, prior theoretical work focused primarily on the prefix-sum workload. That workload assumes a constant learning rate, whereas in practice learning rate schedules are widely used to accelerate training and improve convergence. We close this gap by deriving general upper and lower bounds for a broad class of learning rate schedules in both single- and multi-epoch settings. Building on these results, we propose a learning-rate-aware factorization that achieves improvements over prefix-sum factorizations under both MaxSE and MeanSE error metrics. Our theoretical analysis yields memory-efficient constructions suitable for practical deployment, and experiments on CIFAR-10 and IMDB datasets confirm that schedule-aware factorizations improve accuracy in private training.
Cite as

Nikita P. Kalinin and Joel Daniel Andersson. Learning Rate Scheduling with Matrix Factorization for Private Training. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 2:1-2:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kalinin_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.2,
  author =	{Kalinin, Nikita P. and Andersson, Joel Daniel},
  title =	{{Learning Rate Scheduling with Matrix Factorization for Private Training}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259738},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, machine learning, matrix factorization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20
Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation

Authors: Ben Jacobsen and Nitin Kohli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
Algorithmic predictions are increasingly used to inform the allocation of scarce resources. The promise of these methods is that, through machine learning, they can better identify the people who would benefit most from interventions. Recently, however, several works have called this assumption into question by demonstrating the existence of settings where simple, unit-level allocation strategies can meet or even exceed the performance of those based on individual-level targeting. Separately, other works have objected to individual-level targeting on privacy grounds, leading to an unusual situation where a single solution, unit-level targeting, is recommended for reasons of both privacy and utility. Motivated by the desire to fully understand the interplay of privacy and targeting levels, we initiate the study of aid allocation systems that satisfy differential privacy, synthesizing existing works on private optimization with the economic models of aid allocation used in the non-private literature. To this end, we investigate private variants of both individual and unit-level allocation strategies in both stochastic and distribution-free settings under a range of constraints on data availability. Through this analysis, we provide clean, interpretable bounds characterizing the tradeoffs between privacy, efficiency, and targeting precision in allocation.
Cite as

Ben Jacobsen and Nitin Kohli. Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 20:1-20:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jacobsen_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20,
  author =	{Jacobsen, Ben and Kohli, Nitin},
  title =	{{Privacy, Prediction, and Allocation}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259935},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, fair allocation, limits of prediction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22
Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation

Authors: Mark Bun, Marco Gaboardi, and Connor Wagaman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
We resolve an open question of Jain, Raskhodnikova, Sivakumar, and Smith (ICML 2023) by exhibiting a problem separating differential privacy under continual observation in the oblivious and adaptive settings. The continual observation (a.k.a. continual release) model formalizes privacy for streaming algorithms, where data is received over time and output is released at each time step. In the oblivious setting, privacy need only hold for data streams fixed in advance; in the adaptive setting, privacy is required even for streams that can be chosen adaptively based on the streaming algorithm’s output. We describe the first explicit separation between the oblivious and adaptive settings. The problem showing this separation is based on the correlated vector queries problem of Bun, Steinke, and Ullman (SODA 2017). Specifically, we present an (ε,0)-DP algorithm for the oblivious setting that remains accurate for exponentially many time steps in the dimension of the input. On the other hand, we show that every (ε,δ)-DP adaptive algorithm fails to be accurate after releasing output for only a constant number of time steps.
Cite as

Mark Bun, Marco Gaboardi, and Connor Wagaman. Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 22:1-22:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bun_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22,
  author =	{Bun, Mark and Gaboardi, Marco and Wagaman, Connor},
  title =	{{Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:11},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259959},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, continual observation, continual release, streaming algorithms, adaptive algorithms}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.2
Securing Dynamic Data: A Primer on Differentially Private Data Structures (Invited Talk)

Authors: Monika Henzinger and Roodabeh Safavi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
We give an introduction into differential privacy in the dynamic setting, called the continual observation setting.
Cite as

Monika Henzinger and Roodabeh Safavi. Securing Dynamic Data: A Primer on Differentially Private Data Structures (Invited Talk). In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 2:1-2:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{henzinger_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.2,
  author =	{Henzinger, Monika and Safavi, Roodabeh},
  title =	{{Securing Dynamic Data: A Primer on Differentially Private Data Structures}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244702},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, continual observation}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.40
Sublinear Space Graph Algorithms in the Continual Release Model

Authors: Alessandro Epasto, Quanquan C. Liu, Tamalika Mukherjee, and Felix Zhou

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
The graph continual release model of differential privacy seeks to produce differentially private solutions to graph problems under a stream of edge updates where new private solutions are released after each update. Thus far, previously known edge-differentially private algorithms for most graph problems including densest subgraph and matchings in the continual release setting only output real-value estimates (not vertex subset solutions) and do not use sublinear space. Instead, they rely on computing exact graph statistics on the input [Hendrik Fichtenberger et al., 2021; Shuang Song et al., 2018]. In this paper, we leverage sparsification to address the above shortcomings for edge-insertion streams. Our edge-differentially private algorithms use sublinear space with respect to the number of edges in the graph while some also achieve sublinear space in the number of vertices in the graph. In addition, for the densest subgraph problem, we also output edge-differentially private vertex subset solutions; no previous graph algorithms in the continual release model output such subsets. We make novel use of assorted sparsification techniques from the non-private streaming and static graph algorithms literature to achieve new results in the sublinear space, continual release setting. This includes algorithms for densest subgraph, maximum matching, as well as the first continual release k-core decomposition algorithm. We also develop a novel sparse level data structure for k-core decomposition that may be of independent interest. To complement our insertion-only algorithms, we conclude with polynomial additive error lower bounds for edge-privacy in the fully dynamic setting, where only logarithmic lower bounds were previously known.
Cite as

Alessandro Epasto, Quanquan C. Liu, Tamalika Mukherjee, and Felix Zhou. Sublinear Space Graph Algorithms in the Continual Release Model. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 40:1-40:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{epasto_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.40,
  author =	{Epasto, Alessandro and Liu, Quanquan C. and Mukherjee, Tamalika and Zhou, Felix},
  title =	{{Sublinear Space Graph Algorithms in the Continual Release Model}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{40:1--40:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.40},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244064},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.40},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Privacy, Continual Release, Densest Subgraph, k-Core Decomposition, Maximum Matching}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10
Count on Your Elders: Laplace vs Gaussian Noise

Authors: Joel Daniel Andersson, Rasmus Pagh, Teresa Anna Steiner, and Sahel Torkamani

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
In recent years, Gaussian noise has become a popular tool in differentially private algorithms, often replacing Laplace noise which dominated the early literature on differential privacy. Gaussian noise is the standard approach to approximate differential privacy, often resulting in much higher utility than traditional (pure) differential privacy mechanisms. In this paper we argue that Laplace noise may in fact be preferable to Gaussian noise in many settings, in particular when we seek to achieve (ε,δ)-differential privacy for small values of δ. We consider two scenarios: First, we consider the problem of counting under continual observation and present a new generalization of the binary tree mechanism that uses a k-ary number system with negative digits to improve the privacy-accuracy trade-off. Our mechanism uses Laplace noise and whenever δ is sufficiently small it improves the mean squared error over the best possible (ε,δ)-differentially private factorization mechanisms based on Gaussian noise. Specifically, using k = 19 we get an asymptotic improvement over the bound given in the work by Henzinger, Upadhyay and Upadhyay (SODA 2023) when δ = O(T^{-0.92}). Second, we show that the noise added by the Gaussian mechanism can always be replaced by Laplace noise of comparable variance for the same (ε, δ)-differential privacy guarantee, and in fact for sufficiently small δ the variance of the Laplace noise becomes strictly better. This challenges the conventional wisdom that Gaussian noise should be used for high-dimensional noise. Finally, we study whether counting under continual observation may be easier in an average-case sense than in a worst-case sense. We show that, under pure differential privacy, the expected worst-case error for a random input must be Ω(log(T)/ε), matching the known lower bound for worst-case inputs.
Cite as

Joel Daniel Andersson, Rasmus Pagh, Teresa Anna Steiner, and Sahel Torkamani. Count on Your Elders: Laplace vs Gaussian Noise. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 10:1-10:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{andersson_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10,
  author =	{Andersson, Joel Daniel and Pagh, Rasmus and Steiner, Teresa Anna and Torkamani, Sahel},
  title =	{{Count on Your Elders: Laplace vs Gaussian Noise}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231376},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, continual observation, streaming, prefix sums, trees}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.13
Low Sensitivity Hopsets

Authors: Vikrant Ashvinkumar, Aaron Bernstein, Chengyuan Deng, Jie Gao, and Nicole Wein

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
Given a weighted graph G = (V,E,w), a (β, ε)-hopset H is an edge set such that for any s,t ∈ V, where s can reach t in G, there is a path from s to t in G ∪ H which uses at most β hops whose length is in the range [dist_G(s,t), (1+ε)dist_G(s,t)]. We break away from the traditional question that asks for a hopset H that achieves small |H| and small diameter β and instead study the sensitivity of H, a new quality measure. The sensitivity of a vertex (or edge) given a hopset H is, informally, the number of times a single hop in G ∪ H bypasses it; a bit more formally, assuming shortest paths in G are unique, it is the number of hopset edges (s,t) ∈ H such that the vertex (or edge) is contained in the unique st-path in G having length exactly dist_G(s,t). The sensitivity associated with H is then the maximum sensitivity over all vertices (or edges). The highlights of our results are: - A construction for (Õ(√n), 0)-hopsets on undirected graphs with O(log n) sensitivity, complemented with a lower bound showing that Õ(√n) is tight up to polylogarithmic factors for any construction with polylogarithmic sensitivity. - A construction for (n^o(1), ε)-hopsets on undirected graphs with n^o(1) sensitivity for any ε > 0 that is at least inverse polylogarithmic, complemented with a lower bound on the tradeoff between β, ε, and the sensitivity. - We define a notion of sensitivity for β-shortcut sets (which are the reachability analogues of hopsets) and give a construction for Õ(√n)-shortcut sets on directed graphs with O(log n) sensitivity, complemented with a lower bound showing that β = Ω̃(n^{1/3}) for any construction with polylogarithmic sensitivity. We believe hopset sensitivity is a natural measure in and of itself, and could potentially find use in a diverse range of contexts. More concretely, the notion of hopset sensitivity is also directly motivated by the Differentially Private All Sets Range Queries problem [Deng et al. WADS 23]. Our result for O(log n) sensitivity (Õ(√n), 0)-hopsets on undirected graphs immediately improves the current best-known upper bound on utility from Õ(n^{1/3}) to Õ(n^{1/4}) in the pure-DP setting, which is tight up to polylogarithmic factors.
Cite as

Vikrant Ashvinkumar, Aaron Bernstein, Chengyuan Deng, Jie Gao, and Nicole Wein. Low Sensitivity Hopsets. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 13:1-13:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ashvinkumar_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.13,
  author =	{Ashvinkumar, Vikrant and Bernstein, Aaron and Deng, Chengyuan and Gao, Jie and Wein, Nicole},
  title =	{{Low Sensitivity Hopsets}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226418},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hopsets, Shortcuts, Sensitivity, Differential Privacy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.43
Space Complexity of Minimum Cut Problems in Single-Pass Streams

Authors: Matthew Ding, Alexandro Garces, Jason Li, Honghao Lin, Jelani Nelson, Vihan Shah, and David P. Woodruff

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We consider the problem of finding a minimum cut of a weighted graph presented as a single-pass stream. While graph sparsification in streams has been intensively studied, the specific application of finding minimum cuts in streams is less well-studied. To this end, we show upper and lower bounds on minimum cut problems in insertion-only streams for a variety of settings, including for both randomized and deterministic algorithms, for both arbitrary and random order streams, and for both approximate and exact algorithms. One of our main results is an Õ(n/ε) space algorithm with fast update time for approximating a spectral cut query with high probability on a stream given in an arbitrary order. Our result breaks the Ω(n/ε²) space lower bound required of a sparsifier that approximates all cuts simultaneously. Using this result, we provide streaming algorithms with near optimal space of Õ(n/ε) for minimum cut and approximate all-pairs effective resistances, with matching space lower-bounds. The amortized update time of our algorithms is Õ(1), provided that the number of edges in the input graph is at least (n/ε²)^{1+o(1)}. We also give a generic way of incorporating sketching into a recursive contraction algorithm to improve the post-processing time of our algorithms. In addition to these results, we give a random-order streaming algorithm that computes the exact minimum cut on a simple, unweighted graph using Õ(n) space. Finally, we give an Ω(n/ε²) space lower bound for deterministic minimum cut algorithms which matches the best-known upper bound up to polylogarithmic factors.
Cite as

Matthew Ding, Alexandro Garces, Jason Li, Honghao Lin, Jelani Nelson, Vihan Shah, and David P. Woodruff. Space Complexity of Minimum Cut Problems in Single-Pass Streams. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 43:1-43:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ding_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.43,
  author =	{Ding, Matthew and Garces, Alexandro and Li, Jason and Lin, Honghao and Nelson, Jelani and Shah, Vihan and Woodruff, David P.},
  title =	{{Space Complexity of Minimum Cut Problems in Single-Pass Streams}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{43:1--43:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.43},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226714},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.43},
  annote =	{Keywords: minimum cut, approximate, random order, lower bound}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.19
Differential Privacy and Sublinear Time Are Incompatible Sometimes

Authors: Jeremiah Blocki, Hendrik Fichtenberger, Elena Grigorescu, and Tamalika Mukherjee

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
Differential privacy and sublinear algorithms are both rapidly emerging algorithmic themes in times of big data analysis. Although recent works have shown the existence of differentially private sublinear algorithms for many problems including graph parameter estimation and clustering, little is known regarding hardness results on these algorithms. In this paper, we initiate the study of lower bounds for problems that aim for both differentially-private and sublinear-time algorithms. Our main result is the incompatibility of both the desiderata in the general case. In particular, we prove that a simple problem based on one-way marginals yields both a differentially-private algorithm, as well as a sublinear-time algorithm, but does not admit a "strictly" sublinear-time algorithm that is also differentially private.
Cite as

Jeremiah Blocki, Hendrik Fichtenberger, Elena Grigorescu, and Tamalika Mukherjee. Differential Privacy and Sublinear Time Are Incompatible Sometimes. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 19:1-19:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{blocki_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.19,
  author =	{Blocki, Jeremiah and Fichtenberger, Hendrik and Grigorescu, Elena and Mukherjee, Tamalika},
  title =	{{Differential Privacy and Sublinear Time Are Incompatible Sometimes}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226473},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, sublinear algorithms, sublinear-time algorithms, one-way marginals, lower bounds}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.27
The Discrepancy of Shortest Paths

Authors: Greg Bodwin, Chengyuan Deng, Jie Gao, Gary Hoppenworth, Jalaj Upadhyay, and Chen Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 297, 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)

Abstract
The hereditary discrepancy of a set system is a quantitative measure of the pseudorandom properties of the system. Roughly speaking, hereditary discrepancy measures how well one can 2-color the elements of the system so that each set contains approximately the same number of elements of each color. Hereditary discrepancy has numerous applications in computational geometry, communication complexity and derandomization. More recently, the hereditary discrepancy of the set system of shortest paths has found applications in differential privacy [Chen et al. SODA 23]. The contribution of this paper is to improve the upper and lower bounds on the hereditary discrepancy of set systems of unique shortest paths in graphs. In particular, we show that any system of unique shortest paths in an undirected weighted graph has hereditary discrepancy O(n^{1/4}), and we construct lower bound examples demonstrating that this bound is tight up to polylog n factors. Our lower bounds hold even for planar graphs and bipartite graphs, and improve a previous lower bound of Ω(n^{1/6}) obtained by applying the trace bound of Chazelle and Lvov [SoCG'00] to a classical point-line system of Erdős. As applications, we improve the lower bound on the additive error for differentially-private all pairs shortest distances from Ω(n^{1/6}) [Chen et al. SODA 23] to Ω̃(n^{1/4}), and we improve the lower bound on additive error for the differentially-private all sets range queries problem to Ω̃(n^{1/4}), which is tight up to polylog n factors [Deng et al. WADS 23].
Cite as

Greg Bodwin, Chengyuan Deng, Jie Gao, Gary Hoppenworth, Jalaj Upadhyay, and Chen Wang. The Discrepancy of Shortest Paths. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 27:1-27:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bodwin_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.27,
  author =	{Bodwin, Greg and Deng, Chengyuan and Gao, Jie and Hoppenworth, Gary and Upadhyay, Jalaj and Wang, Chen},
  title =	{{The Discrepancy of Shortest Paths}},
  booktitle =	{51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-322-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{297},
  editor =	{Bringmann, Karl and Grohe, Martin and Puppis, Gabriele and Svensson, Ola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-201705},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Discrepancy, hereditary discrepancy, shortest paths, differential privacy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31
Block-Wise Non-Malleable Codes

Authors: Nishanth Chandran, Vipul Goyal, Pratyay Mukherjee, Omkant Pandey, and Jalaj Upadhyay

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)

Abstract
Non-malleable codes, introduced by Dziembowski, Pietrzak, and Wichs (ICS'10) provide the guarantee that if a codeword c of a message m, is modified by a tampering function f to c', then c' either decodes to m or to "something unrelated" to m. In recent literature, a lot of focus has been on explicitly constructing such codes against a large and natural class of tampering functions such as split-state model in which the tampering function operates on different parts of the codeword independently. In this work, we consider a stronger adversarial model called block-wise tampering model, in which we allow tampering to depend on more than one block: if a codeword consists of two blocks c = (c1, c2), then the first tampering function f1 could produce a tampered part c'_1 = f1(c1) and the second tampering function f2 could produce c'_2 = f2(c1, c2) depending on both c2 and c1. The notion similarly extends to multiple blocks where tampering of block ci could happen with the knowledge of all cj for j <= i. We argue this is a natural notion where, for example, the blocks are sent one by one and the adversary must send the tampered block before it gets the next block. A little thought reveals that it is impossible to construct such codes that are non-malleable (in the standard sense) against such a powerful adversary: indeed, upon receiving the last block, an adversary could decode the entire codeword and then can tamper depending on the message. In light of this impossibility, we consider a natural relaxation called non-malleable codes with replacement which requires the adversary to produce not only related but also a valid codeword in order to succeed. Unfortunately, we show that even this relaxed definition is not achievable in the information-theoretic setting (i.e., when the tampering functions can be unbounded) which implies that we must turn our attention towards computationally bounded adversaries. As our main result, we show how to construct a block-wise non-malleable code (BNMC) from sub-exponentially hard one-way permutations. We provide an interesting connection between BNMC and non-malleable commitments. We show that any BNMC can be converted into a nonmalleable (w.r.t. opening) commitment scheme. Our techniques, quite surprisingly, give rise to a non-malleable commitment scheme (secure against so-called synchronizing adversaries), in which only the committer sends messages. We believe this result to be of independent interest. In the other direction, we show that any non-interactive non-malleable (w.r.t. opening) commitment can be used to construct BNMC only with 2 blocks. Unfortunately, such commitment scheme exists only under highly non-standard assumptions (adaptive one-way functions) and hence can not substitute our main construction.
Cite as

Nishanth Chandran, Vipul Goyal, Pratyay Mukherjee, Omkant Pandey, and Jalaj Upadhyay. Block-Wise Non-Malleable Codes. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 31:1-31:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chandran_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31,
  author =	{Chandran, Nishanth and Goyal, Vipul and Mukherjee, Pratyay and Pandey, Omkant and Upadhyay, Jalaj},
  title =	{{Block-Wise Non-Malleable Codes}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-63102},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non-malleable codes, Non-malleable commitments, Block-wise Tampering, Complexity-leveraging}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 12 Document/PDF
  • 8 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2026
  • 6 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2016

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Upadhyay, Jalaj
  • 2 Andersson, Joel Daniel
  • 2 Deng, Chengyuan
  • 2 Gao, Jie
  • 2 Henzinger, Monika
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Security and privacy
  • 3 Security and privacy → Privacy-preserving protocols
  • 3 Theory of computation → Theory of database privacy and security
  • 2 Theory of computation → Shortest paths
  • 2 Theory of computation → Streaming, sublinear and near linear time algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 differential privacy
  • 3 Differential privacy
  • 3 continual observation
  • 2 Differential Privacy
  • 2 continual release
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact