24 Search Results for "Valiant, Gregory"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.32
Semirandom Planted Bipartite Subgraphs

Authors: Anand Louis and Kirtan Vora

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 370, 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)

Abstract
There have been many recent works studying planted subgraphs problems. The semirandom planted bipartite subgraph problem is defined as follows. Starting with a vertex set V, an arbitrary subset S ⊂ V of size k is chosen, then an arbitrary bipartite graph is added on S. After this between each pair of vertices in S × (V ⧵ S) an edge is added independently with probability p, then an arbitrary graph is added on V⧵ S. The analogous semirandom planted clique problem, where S forms a clique, has been studied starting with the work of Fiege and Kilian [Uriel Feige and Joe Kilian, 2001]; recent work by [Blasiok et al., 2024; Venkatesan Guruswami and Hsin-Po Wang, 2025] gave an algorithm for this problem when k = Ω(√{n log n}). We give an algorithm for semirandom planted bipartite subgraph problem when k = Ω(√{n log n}) and the two color classes are roughly balanced. Our algorithms are essentially the same as the elegant greedy algorithm of [Blasiok et al., 2024]. We generalize their idea to our setting. Handling the arbitrary nature of the bipartite graph requires some new technical ideas and is our main technical contribution.
Cite as

Anand Louis and Kirtan Vora. Semirandom Planted Bipartite Subgraphs. In 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 370, pp. 32:1-32:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{louis_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.32,
  author =	{Louis, Anand and Vora, Kirtan},
  title =	{{Semirandom Planted Bipartite Subgraphs}},
  booktitle =	{20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-421-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{370},
  editor =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260681},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Semirandom Models, Spectral Algorithms, Planted Subgraphs, Random Graphs, Approximate Recovery Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17
Protecting the Undeleted in Machine Unlearning

Authors: Aloni Cohen, Refael Kohen, Kobbi Nissim, and Uri Stemmer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 368, 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)

Abstract
Machine unlearning aims to remove specific data points from a trained model, often striving to emulate "perfect retraining", i.e., producing the model that would have been obtained had the deleted data never been included. We demonstrate that this approach, and security definitions that enable it, carry significant privacy risks for the remaining (undeleted) data points. We present a reconstruction attack showing that for certain tasks, which can be computed securely without deletions, a mechanism adhering to perfect retraining allows an adversary controlling merely ω(1) data points to reconstruct almost the entire dataset simply by issuing deletion requests. We survey existing definitions for machine unlearning, showing they are either susceptible to such attacks or too restrictive to support basic functionalities like exact summation. To address this problem, we propose a new security definition that specifically safeguards undeleted data against leakage caused by the deletion of other points. We show that our definition permits several essential functionalities, such as bulletin boards, summations, and statistical learning.
Cite as

Aloni Cohen, Refael Kohen, Kobbi Nissim, and Uri Stemmer. Protecting the Undeleted in Machine Unlearning. In 7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 368, pp. 17:1-17:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17,
  author =	{Cohen, Aloni and Kohen, Refael and Nissim, Kobbi and Stemmer, Uri},
  title =	{{Protecting the Undeleted in Machine Unlearning}},
  booktitle =	{7th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2026)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-419-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{368},
  editor =	{Lin, Huijia (Rachel)},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259901},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2026.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Unlearning, data deletion, privacy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.5
On the Complexity of Language Membership for Probabilistic Words

Authors: Antoine Amarilli, Mikaël Monet, Paul Raphaël, and Sylvain Salvati

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
We study the membership problem to context-free languages L (CFLs) on probabilistic words, that specify for each position a probability distribution on the letters (assuming independence across positions). Our task is to compute, given a probabilistic word, what is the probability that a word drawn according to the distribution belongs to L. This problem generalizes the problem of counting how many words of length n belong to L, or of counting how many completions of a partial word belong to L. We show that this problem is in polynomial time for unambiguous context-free languages (uCFLs), but can be #P-hard already for unions of two linear uCFLs. More generally, we show that the problem is in polynomial time for so-called poly-slicewise-unambiguous languages, where given a length n we can tractably compute an uCFL for the words of length n in the language. This class includes some inherently ambiguous languages, and implies the tractability of bounded CFLs and of languages recognized by unambiguous polynomial-time counter automata; but we show that the problem can be #P-hard for nondeterministic counter automata, even for Parikh automata with a single counter. We then introduce classes of circuits from knowledge compilation which we use for tractable counting, and show that this covers the tractability of poly-slicewise-unambiguous languages and of some CFLs that are not poly-slicewise-unambiguous. Extending these circuits with negation further allows us to show tractability for the language of primitive words, and for the language of concatenations of two palindromes. We finally show the conditional undecidability of the meta-problem that asks, given a CFG, whether the probabilistic membership problem for that CFG is tractable or #P-hard.
Cite as

Antoine Amarilli, Mikaël Monet, Paul Raphaël, and Sylvain Salvati. On the Complexity of Language Membership for Probabilistic Words. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 5:1-5:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amarilli_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.5,
  author =	{Amarilli, Antoine and Monet, Mika\"{e}l and Rapha\"{e}l, Paul and Salvati, Sylvain},
  title =	{{On the Complexity of Language Membership for Probabilistic Words}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254943},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automaton, probabilistic words, context-free grammar, membership problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.30
New Bounds for Circular Trace Reconstruction

Authors: Arnav Burudgunte, Paul Valiant, and Hongao Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The "trace reconstruction" problem asks, given an unknown binary string x and a channel that repeatedly returns "traces" of x with each bit randomly deleted with some probability p, how many traces are needed to recover x? There is an exponential gap between the best known upper and lower bounds for this problem. Many variants of the model have been introduced in hopes of motivating or revealing new approaches to narrow this gap. We study the variant of circular trace reconstruction introduced by Narayanan and Ren (ITCS 2021), in which traces undergo a random cyclic shift in addition to random deletions. We show an improved lower bound of Ω̃(n⁵) for circular trace reconstruction. This contrasts with the (previously) best known lower bounds of Ω̃(n³) in the circular case and Ω̃(n^{3/2}) in the linear case. Our bound shows the indistinguishability of traces from two sparse strings x,y that each have a constant number of nonzeros. Can this technique be extended significantly? How hard is it to reconstruct a sparse string x under a cyclic deletion channel? We resolve these questions by showing, using Fourier techniques, that Õ(n⁶) traces suffice for reconstructing any constant-sparse string in a circular deletion channel, in contrast to the best known upper bound of exp(Õ(n^{1/3})) for general strings in the circular deletion channel. This shows that new algorithms or new lower bounds must focus on non-constant-sparse strings.
Cite as

Arnav Burudgunte, Paul Valiant, and Hongao Wang. New Bounds for Circular Trace Reconstruction. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 30:1-30:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{burudgunte_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.30,
  author =	{Burudgunte, Arnav and Valiant, Paul and Wang, Hongao},
  title =	{{New Bounds for Circular Trace Reconstruction}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253176},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: Trace reconstruction, algorithmic statistics, Fourier analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.55
Universally Optimal Streaming Algorithm for Random Walks in Dense Graphs

Authors: Klim Efremenko, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, and Zhijun Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Sampling a random walk is a fundamental primitive in many graph applications. In the streaming model, it is known that sampling an L-step random walk on an n-vertex directed graph requires Ω(n L) space, implying that no sublinear-space streaming algorithm exists for general graphs. We show that sublinear algorithms are possible for the case of dense graphs, where every vertex has out-degree at least Ω(n). In particular, we give a one-pass turnstile streaming algorithm that uses only 𝒪̃(L) memory for such graphs. More broadly, for graphs with minimum out-degree at least d, our streaming algorithm samples a random walk using 𝒪̃(n/d ⋅ L) memory. We show that our algorithm is optimal in a strong "beyond worst-case" sense. To formalize this, we introduce the notion of universal optimality for graph streaming algorithms. Informally, a streaming algorithm is universally optimal if it performs (almost) as well as possible on every graph, assuming a worst-case choice of the streaming order. This notion of universal optimality is a key conceptual contribution of our work.
Cite as

Klim Efremenko, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, and Zhijun Zhang. Universally Optimal Streaming Algorithm for Random Walks in Dense Graphs. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 55:1-55:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{efremenko_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.55,
  author =	{Efremenko, Klim and Kol, Gillat and Saxena, Raghuvansh R. and Zhang, Zhijun},
  title =	{{Universally Optimal Streaming Algorithm for Random Walks in Dense Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{55:1--55:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.55},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253423},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.55},
  annote =	{Keywords: Random Walk, streaming Algorithm, universal Optimality}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18
Interactive Proofs for Distribution Testing with Conditional Oracles

Authors: Ari Biswas, Mark Bun, Clément L. Canonne, and Satchit Sivakumar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We revisit the framework of interactive proofs for distribution testing, first introduced by Chiesa and Gur (ITCS 2018), which has recently experienced a surge in interest, accompanied by notable progress (e.g., Herman and Rothblum, STOC 2022, FOCS 2023; Herman, RANDOM 2024). In this model, a data-poor verifier determines whether a probability distribution has a property of interest by interacting with an all-powerful, data-rich but untrusted prover bent on convincing them that it has the property. While prior work gave sample-, time-, and communication-efficient protocols for testing and estimating a range of distribution properties, they all suffer from an inherent issue: for most interesting properties of distributions over a domain of size N, the verifier must draw at least Ω(√N) samples of its own. While sublinear in N, this is still prohibitive for large domains encountered in practice. In this work, we circumvent this limitation by augmenting the verifier with the ability to perform an exponentially smaller number of more powerful (but reasonable) pairwise conditional queries, effectively enabling them to perform "local comparison checks" of the prover’s claims. We systematically investigate the landscape of interactive proofs in this new setting, giving poly-logarithmic query and sample protocols for (tolerantly) testing all label-invariant properties, thus demonstrating exponential savings without compromising on communication, for this large and fundamental class of testing tasks.
Cite as

Ari Biswas, Mark Bun, Clément L. Canonne, and Satchit Sivakumar. Interactive Proofs for Distribution Testing with Conditional Oracles. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 18:1-18:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{biswas_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18,
  author =	{Biswas, Ari and Bun, Mark and Canonne, Cl\'{e}ment L. and Sivakumar, Satchit},
  title =	{{Interactive Proofs for Distribution Testing with Conditional Oracles}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253059},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distribution Testing, Interactive Proofs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95
The Planted Orthogonal Vectors Problem

Authors: David Kühnemann, Adam Polak, and Alon Rosen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
In the k-Orthogonal Vectors (k-OV) problem we are given k sets, each containing n binary vectors of dimension d = n^o(1), and our goal is to pick one vector from each set so that at each coordinate at least one vector has a zero. It is a central problem in fine-grained complexity, conjectured to require n^{k-o(1)} time in the worst case. We propose a way to plant a solution among vectors with i.i.d. p-biased entries, for appropriately chosen p, so that the planted solution is the unique one. Our conjecture is that the resulting k-OV instances still require time n^{k-o(1)} to solve, on average. Our planted distribution has the property that any subset of strictly less than k vectors has the same marginal distribution as in the model distribution, consisting of i.i.d. p-biased random vectors. We use this property to give average-case search-to-decision reductions for k-OV.
Cite as

David Kühnemann, Adam Polak, and Alon Rosen. The Planted Orthogonal Vectors Problem. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 95:1-95:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kuhnemann_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95,
  author =	{K\"{u}hnemann, David and Polak, Adam and Rosen, Alon},
  title =	{{The Planted Orthogonal Vectors Problem}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{95:1--95:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245640},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.95},
  annote =	{Keywords: Average-case complexity, fine-grained complexity, orthogonal vectors}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.11
On Finding Randomly Planted Cliques in Arbitrary Graphs

Authors: Francesco Agrimonti, Marco Bressan, and Tommaso d'Orsi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We study a planted clique model introduced by Feige [Uriel Feige, 2021] where a complete graph of size c⋅ n is planted uniformly at random in an arbitrary n-vertex graph. We give a simple deterministic algorithm that, in almost linear time, recovers a clique of size (c/3)^O(1/c) ⋅ n as long as the original graph has maximum degree at most (1-p)n for some fixed p > 0. The proof hinges on showing that the degrees of the final graph are correlated with the planted clique, in a way similar to (but more intricate than) the classical G(n,1/2)+K_√n planted clique model. Our algorithm suggests a separation from the worst-case model, where, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, no polynomial algorithm can find cliques of size Ω(n) for every fixed c > 0, even if the input graph has maximum degree (1-p)n. Our techniques extend beyond the planted clique model. For example, when the planted graph is a balanced biclique, we recover a balanced biclique of size larger than the best guarantees known for the worst case.
Cite as

Francesco Agrimonti, Marco Bressan, and Tommaso d'Orsi. On Finding Randomly Planted Cliques in Arbitrary Graphs. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 11:1-11:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{agrimonti_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.11,
  author =	{Agrimonti, Francesco and Bressan, Marco and d'Orsi, Tommaso},
  title =	{{On Finding Randomly Planted Cliques in Arbitrary Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243774},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational Complexity, Planted Clique, Semi-random, Unique Games Conjecture, Approximation Algorithms}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23
On the Instance Optimality of Detecting Collisions and Subgraphs

Authors: Omri Ben-Eliezer, Tomer Grossman, and Moni Naor

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
Suppose you are given a function f: [n] → [n] via (black-box) query access to the function. You are looking to find something local, like a collision (a pair x ≠ y s.t. f(x) = f(y)). The question is whether knowing the "shape" of the function helps you or not (by shape we mean that some permutation of the function is known). Formally, we investigate the unlabeled instance optimality of substructure detection problems in graphs and functions. A problem is g(n)-instance optimal if it admits an algorithm A satisfying that for any possible input, the (randomized) query complexity of A is at most g(n) times larger than the query complexity of any algorithm A' which solves the same problem while holding an unlabeled copy of the input (i.e., any A' that "knows the structure of the input"). Our results point to a trichotomy of unlabeled instance optimality among substructure detection problems in graphs and functions: - A few very simple properties have an O(1)-instance optimal algorithm. - Most properties of graphs and functions, with examples such as containing a fixed point or a 3-collision in functions, or a triangle in graphs, are n^{c}-far from instance optimal for some constant c > 0. - The problems of collision detection in functions and finding a claw in a graph serve as a middle ground between the two regimes. We show that these two properties are not Ω(log n)-instance optimal, and conjecture that this bound is tight. We provide evidence towards this conjecture, by proving that finding a claw in a graph is O(log(n))-instance optimal among all input graphs for which the query complexity of an algorithm holding an unlabeled certificate is O(√{n/(log n)}).
Cite as

Omri Ben-Eliezer, Tomer Grossman, and Moni Naor. On the Instance Optimality of Detecting Collisions and Subgraphs. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 23:1-23:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{beneliezer_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23,
  author =	{Ben-Eliezer, Omri and Grossman, Tomer and Naor, Moni},
  title =	{{On the Instance Optimality of Detecting Collisions and Subgraphs}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234002},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: instance optimality, instance complexity, unlabeled certificate, subgraph detection, collision detection}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2
Let’s Try to Be More Tolerant: On Tolerant Property Testing and Distance Approximation (Invited Talk)

Authors: Dana Ron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
This short paper accompanies an invited talk given at ICALP2025. It is an informal, high-level presentation of tolerant testing and distance approximation. It includes some general results as well as a few specific ones, with the aim of providing a taste of this research direction within the area of sublinear algorithms.
Cite as

Dana Ron. Let’s Try to Be More Tolerant: On Tolerant Property Testing and Distance Approximation (Invited Talk). In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 2:1-2:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ron:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2,
  author =	{Ron, Dana},
  title =	{{Let’s Try to Be More Tolerant: On Tolerant Property Testing and Distance Approximation}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233798},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sublinear Algorithms, Tolerant Property Testing, Distance Approximation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.16
Smooth Calibration and Decision Making

Authors: Jason Hartline, Yifan Wu, and Yunran Yang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
Calibration requires predictor outputs to be consistent with their Bayesian posteriors. For machine learning predictors that do not distinguish between small perturbations, calibration errors are continuous in predictions, e.g. smooth calibration error [Foster and Hart, 2018], distance to calibration [Błasiok et al., 2023]. On the contrary, decision-makers who use predictions make optimal decisions discontinuously in probabilistic space, experiencing loss from miscalibration discontinuously. Calibration errors for decision-making are thus discontinuous, e.g., Expected Calibration Error [Foster and Vohra, 1997], and Calibration Decision Loss [Hu and Wu, 2024]. Thus, predictors with a low calibration error for machine learning may suffer a high calibration error for decision-making, i.e. they may not be trustworthy for decision-makers optimizing assuming their predictions are correct. It is natural to ask if post-processing a predictor with a low calibration error for machine learning is without loss to achieve a low calibration error for decision-making. In our paper, we show post-processing an online predictor with ε distance to calibration achieves O(√{ε}) ECE and CDL, which is asymptotically optimal. The post-processing algorithm adds noise to make predictions differentially private. The optimal bound from low distance to calibration predictors from post-processing is non-optimal compared with existing online calibration algorithms that directly optimize for ECE and CDL.
Cite as

Jason Hartline, Yifan Wu, and Yunran Yang. Smooth Calibration and Decision Making. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 16:1-16:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hartline_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.16,
  author =	{Hartline, Jason and Wu, Yifan and Yang, Yunran},
  title =	{{Smooth Calibration and Decision Making}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231438},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Calibration, calibration errors, decision making, differential privacy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.17
Partition Constraints for Conjunctive Queries: Bounds and Worst-Case Optimal Joins

Authors: Kyle Deeds and Timo Camillo Merkl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 328, 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)

Abstract
In the last decade, various works have used statistics on relations to improve both the theory and practice of conjunctive query execution. Starting with the AGM bound which took advantage of relation sizes, later works incorporated statistics like functional dependencies and degree constraints. Each new statistic prompted work along two lines; bounding the size of conjunctive query outputs and worst-case optimal join algorithms. In this work, we continue in this vein by introducing a new statistic called a partition constraint. This statistic captures latent structure within relations by partitioning them into sub-relations which each have much tighter degree constraints. We show that this approach can both refine existing cardinality bounds and improve existing worst-case optimal join algorithms.
Cite as

Kyle Deeds and Timo Camillo Merkl. Partition Constraints for Conjunctive Queries: Bounds and Worst-Case Optimal Joins. In 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 328, pp. 17:1-17:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deeds_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.17,
  author =	{Deeds, Kyle and Merkl, Timo Camillo},
  title =	{{Partition Constraints for Conjunctive Queries: Bounds and Worst-Case Optimal Joins}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-364-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{328},
  editor =	{Roy, Sudeepa and Kara, Ahmet},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-229588},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Worst-Case Optimal Joins, Cardinality Bounds, Degeneracy, Degree Constraints, Partition Constraints}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26
Settling the Complexity of Testing Grainedness of Distributions, and Application to Uniformity Testing in the Huge Object Model

Authors: Clément L. Canonne, Sayantan Sen, and Joy Qiping Yang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
In this work, we study the problem of testing m-grainedness of probability distributions over an n-element universe 𝒰, or, equivalently, of whether a probability distribution is induced by a multiset S ⊆ 𝒰 of size |S| = m. Recently, Goldreich and Ron (Computational Complexity, 2023) proved that Ω(n^c) samples are necessary for testing this property, for any c < 1 and m = Θ(n). They also conjectured that Ω(m/(log m)) samples are necessary for testing this property when m = Θ(n). In this work, we positively settle this conjecture. Using a known connection to the Distribution over Huge objects (DoHo) model introduced by Goldreich and Ron (TheoretiCS, 2023), we leverage our results to provide improved bounds for uniformity testing in the DoHo model.
Cite as

Clément L. Canonne, Sayantan Sen, and Joy Qiping Yang. Settling the Complexity of Testing Grainedness of Distributions, and Application to Uniformity Testing in the Huge Object Model. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 26:1-26:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{canonne_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26,
  author =	{Canonne, Cl\'{e}ment L. and Sen, Sayantan and Yang, Joy Qiping},
  title =	{{Settling the Complexity of Testing Grainedness of Distributions, and Application to Uniformity Testing in the Huge Object Model}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226543},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distribution testing, Uniformity testing, Huge Object Model, Lower bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.52
Combinatorial Pen Testing (Or Consumer Surplus of Deferred-Acceptance Auctions)

Authors: Aadityan Ganesh and Jason Hartline

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
Pen testing is the problem of selecting high-capacity resources when the only way to measure the capacity of a resource expends its capacity. We have a set of n pens with unknown amounts of ink and our goal is to select a feasible subset of pens maximizing the total ink in them. We are allowed to learn about the ink levels by writing with them, but this uses up ink that was previously in the pens. We identify optimal and near optimal pen testing algorithms by drawing analogues to auction theoretic frameworks of deferred-acceptance auctions and virtual values. Our framework allows the conversion of any near optimal deferred-acceptance mechanism into a near optimal pen testing algorithm. Moreover, these algorithms guarantee an additional overhead of at most (1+o(1)) ln n in the approximation factor to the omniscient algorithm that has access to the ink levels in the pens. We use this framework to give pen testing algorithms for various combinatorial constraints like matroid, knapsack, and general downward-closed constraints, and also for online environments.
Cite as

Aadityan Ganesh and Jason Hartline. Combinatorial Pen Testing (Or Consumer Surplus of Deferred-Acceptance Auctions). In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 52:1-52:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ganesh_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.52,
  author =	{Ganesh, Aadityan and Hartline, Jason},
  title =	{{Combinatorial Pen Testing (Or Consumer Surplus of Deferred-Acceptance Auctions)}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{52:1--52:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.52},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226808},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.52},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pen testing, consumer surplus, money-burning, deferred-acceptance auctions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65
Online Versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing

Authors: Esty Kelman, Ephraim Linder, and Sofya Raskhodnikova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We study property testing with incomplete or noisy inputs. The models we consider allow for adversarial manipulation of the input, but differ in whether the manipulation can be done only offline, i.e., before the execution of the algorithm, or online, i.e., as the algorithm runs. The manipulations by an adversary can come in the form of erasures or corruptions. We compare the query complexity and the randomness complexity of property testing in the offline and online models. Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (Theory Comput. `23) provide properties that can be tested with a small number of queries with offline erasures, but cannot be tested at all with online erasures. We demonstrate that the two models are incomparable in terms of query complexity: we construct properties that can be tested with a constant number of queries in the online corruption model, but require querying a significant fraction of the input in the offline erasure model. We also construct properties that exhibit a strong separation between the randomness complexity of testing in the presence of offline and online adversaries: testing these properties in the online model requires exponentially more random bits than in the offline model, even when they are tested with nearly the same number of queries in both models. Our randomness separation relies on a novel reduction from randomness-efficient testers in the adversarial online model to query-efficient testers in the standard model.
Cite as

Esty Kelman, Ephraim Linder, and Sofya Raskhodnikova. Online Versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 65:1-65:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kelman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65,
  author =	{Kelman, Esty and Linder, Ephraim and Raskhodnikova, Sofya},
  title =	{{Online Versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{65:1--65:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226933},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.65},
  annote =	{Keywords: Property Testing, Online Adversary, Offline Adversary, Query Complexity, Randomness Complexity, Separations}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 24 Document/PDF
  • 17 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 6 2026
  • 11 2025
  • 2 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 3 2018
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Valiant, Gregory
  • 2 Canonne, Clément L.
  • 2 Hartline, Jason
  • 2 Qiao, Mingda
  • 1 Agrimonti, Francesco
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 23 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Streaming, sublinear and near linear time algorithms
  • 4 Theory of computation → Computational complexity and cryptography
  • 2 Theory of computation → Approximation algorithms analysis
  • 1 Information systems → Graph-based database models
  • 1 Information systems → Query optimization
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Approximate Recovery Algorithms
  • 1 Approximation Algorithms
  • 1 Automaton
  • 1 Average-case complexity
  • 1 Calibration
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact