11 Search Results for "Gleixner, Ambros M."

Document
PACE Solver Description
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37
PACE Solver Description: Minimum Hitting Set Computation via Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving

Authors: André Schidler

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
This paper describes our hybrid MaxSAT and mixed integer programming approach for finding minimum hitting sets as submitted to the 2025 PACE challenge. We also discuss hitting set specific challenges, lower bounds, preprocessing and design choices.
Cite as

André Schidler. PACE Solver Description: Minimum Hitting Set Computation via Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 37:1-37:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schidler:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37,
  author =	{Schidler, Andr\'{e}},
  title =	{{PACE Solver Description: Minimum Hitting Set Computation via Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251692},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: hitting set, maxsat, core-guided}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32
The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set

Authors: Mario Grobler and Sebastian Siebertz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
The 10th iteration of the of the Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments challenge (PACE) 2025 was devoted to engineer algorithms solving the Dominating Set problem as well as the Hitting Set problem. In contrast to the last iterations, these problems are (under standard assumptions) not fixed-parameter tractable (fpt) in general. However, restricting the structure of the input (e.g. to planar graphs or degenerate graphs for Dominating Set, or to set systems with sets of bounded size for Hitting Set) renders these problems fpt. Following the spirit of the last iterations of the PACE challenge, there is an exact track and a heuristic track for each problem; each track coming with a benchmark set of 100 public instances and 100 private instances. Overall, the PACE 2025 had 71 participants from 25 teams, 13 countries, and 3 continents. In this report, we briefly describe the setup of the challenge, the selection of benchmark instances, as well as the ranking of the participating teams. We also briefly outline the approaches used in the submitted solvers.
Cite as

Mario Grobler and Sebastian Siebertz. The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 32:1-32:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grobler_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32,
  author =	{Grobler, Mario and Siebertz, Sebastian},
  title =	{{The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251644},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: PACE 2025 Report, Dominating Set, Hitting Set, Algorithm Engineering, FPT, Heuristics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.21
Practically Feasible Proof Logging for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization

Authors: Wietze Koops, Daniel Le Berre, Magnus O. Myreen, Jakob Nordström, Andy Oertel, Yong Kiam Tan, and Marc Vinyals

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Certifying solvers have long been standard for decision problems in Boolean satisfiability (SAT), allowing for proof logging and checking with very limited overhead, but developing similar tools for combinatorial optimization has remained a challenge. A recent promising approach covering a wide range of solving paradigms is pseudo-Boolean proof logging, but this has mostly consisted of proof-of-concept works far from delivering the performance required for real-world deployment. In this work, we present an efficient toolchain based on VeriPB and CakePB for formally verified pseudo-Boolean optimization. We implement proof logging for the full range of techniques in the state-of-the-art solvers RoundingSat and Sat4j, including core-guided search and linear programming integration with Farkas certificates and cut generation. Our experimental evaluation shows that proof logging and checking performance in this much more expressive paradigm is now quite close to the level of SAT solving, and hence is clearly practically feasible.
Cite as

Wietze Koops, Daniel Le Berre, Magnus O. Myreen, Jakob Nordström, Andy Oertel, Yong Kiam Tan, and Marc Vinyals. Practically Feasible Proof Logging for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 21:1-21:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koops_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.21,
  author =	{Koops, Wietze and Le Berre, Daniel and Myreen, Magnus O. and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob and Oertel, Andy and Tan, Yong Kiam and Vinyals, Marc},
  title =	{{Practically Feasible Proof Logging for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238825},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof logging, certifying algorithms, combinatorial optimization, certification, pseudo-Boolean solving, 0-1 integer linear programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.26
Parallel MIP Solving with Dynamic Task Decomposition

Authors: Peng Lin, Shaowei Cai, Mengchuan Zou, and Shengqi Chen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) is a foundational model in operations research. Although significant progress has been made in enhancing sequential MIP solvers through sophisticated techniques and heuristics, remarkable developments in computing resources have made parallel solving a promising direction for performance improvement. In this work, we propose a novel parallel MIP solving framework that employs dynamic task decomposition in a divide-and-conquer paradigm. Our framework incorporates a hardness estimate heuristic to identify challenging solving tasks and a reward decaying mechanism to reinforce the task decomposition decision. We apply our framework to two state-of-the-art open-source MIP solvers, SCIP and HiGHS, yielding efficient parallel solvers. Extensive experiments on the full MIPLIB benchmark, using up to 128 cores, demonstrate that our framework yields substantial performance improvements over modern divide-and-conquer parallel solvers. Moreover, our parallel solvers have established new best known solutions for 16 open MIPLIB instances.
Cite as

Peng Lin, Shaowei Cai, Mengchuan Zou, and Shengqi Chen. Parallel MIP Solving with Dynamic Task Decomposition. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 26:1-26:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lin_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.26,
  author =	{Lin, Peng and Cai, Shaowei and Zou, Mengchuan and Chen, Shengqi},
  title =	{{Parallel MIP Solving with Dynamic Task Decomposition}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238871},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mixed Integer Programming, Parallel Computing, Complete Search, Task Decomposition}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23
Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization

Authors: Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
In the the last two decades, a lot of effort has been devoted to the development of satisfiability-checking tools for a variety of SAT-related problems. However, most of these tools lack optimization capabilities. That is, instead of finding any solution, one is sometimes interested in a solution that is best according to some criterion. Pseudo-Boolean solvers can be used to deal with optimization by successively solving a series of problems that contain an additional pseudo-Boolean constraint expressing that a better solution is required. A key point for the success of this simple approach is that lemmas that are learned for one problem can be reused for subsequent ones. In this paper we go one step further and show how, by using a simple symbolic conflict analysis procedure, not only can lemmas be reused between problems but also strengthened, thus further pruning the search space traversal. In addition, we show how this technique automatically allows one to infer upper bounds in maximization problems, thus giving an estimation of how far the solver is from finding an optimal solution. Experimental results with our PB solver reveal that (i) this technique is indeed effective in practice, providing important speedups in problems where several solutions are found and (ii) on problems with very few solutions, where the impact of our technique is limited, its overhead is negligible.
Cite as

Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao. Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nieuwenhuis_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23,
  author =	{Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Oliveras, Albert and Rodr{\'\i}guez-Carbonell, Enric and Zhao, Rui},
  title =	{{Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237579},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, Pseudo-Boolean Optimization, Conflict Analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17
Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability

Authors: George Katsirelos

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
The core-guided algorithm OLL is the basis of some of the most successful algorithms for MaxSAT in recent evaluations. It works by iteratively finding cores of the formula and transforming it so that it exhibits a higher lower bound. It has recently been shown to implicitly discover cores of the original formula, as well as a compact representation of its reasoning within a linear program. In this paper, we use and extend these results to design a practical MaxSAT solver. We show an explicit linear program which matches and usually exceeds the bound computed by OLL. We show that OLL can be restated as an algorithm that explicitly computes a feasible dual solution of this linear program. This restated algorithm naturally works with an arbitrary dual solution. It can in fact be used to improve any LP representation of the MaxSAT instance. This presents a large increase of the potential design space for such algorithms. We describe some potential improvements from this insight and show that an implementation outperforms the state of the art algorithms on the set of instances from the latest MaxSAT evaluation.
Cite as

George Katsirelos. Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 17:1-17:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{katsirelos:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17,
  author =	{Katsirelos, George},
  title =	{{Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237513},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: maximum satisfiability, core-guided solvers, linear programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.21
Improving Reduction Techniques in Pseudo-Boolean Conflict Analysis

Authors: Orestis Lomis, Jo Devriendt, Hendrik Bierlee, and Tias Guns

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Recent pseudo-Boolean (PB) solvers leverage the cutting planes proof system to perform SAT-style conflict analysis during search. This process learns implied PB constraints, which can prune later parts of the search tree and is crucial to a PB solver’s performance. A key step in PB conflict analysis is the reduction of a reason constraint, which caused a variable propagation that contributed to the conflict. While necessary, reduction generally makes the reason constraint less strong. Consequently, different approaches to reduction have been proposed, broadly categorised as division- or saturation-based, with the aim of preserving the strength of the reason constraint as much as possible. This paper proposes two novel techniques in each reduction category. We theoretically show how each technique yields reason constraints which are at least as strong as those obtained from existing reduction methods. We then evaluate the empirical effectiveness of the reduction techniques on hard knapsack instances and the most recent PB'24 competition benchmarks.
Cite as

Orestis Lomis, Jo Devriendt, Hendrik Bierlee, and Tias Guns. Improving Reduction Techniques in Pseudo-Boolean Conflict Analysis. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 21:1-21:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lomis_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.21,
  author =	{Lomis, Orestis and Devriendt, Jo and Bierlee, Hendrik and Guns, Tias},
  title =	{{Improving Reduction Techniques in Pseudo-Boolean Conflict Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237551},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Constraint Programming, Pseudo-Boolean Reasoning, Conflict Analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27
Sparsity-Driven Aggregation of Mixed Integer Programs

Authors: Liding Xu, Gioni Mexi, and Ksenia Bestuzheva

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 338, 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)

Abstract
Cutting planes are crucial for the performance of branch-and-cut algorithms for solving mixed-integer programming (MIP) problems, and linear row aggregation has been successfully applied to better leverage the potential of several major families of MIP cutting planes. This paper formulates the problem of finding good quality aggregations as an 𝓁₀-norm minimization problem and employs a combination of the lasso method and iterative reweighting to efficiently find sparse solutions corresponding to good aggregations. A comparative analysis of the proposed algorithm and the state-of-the-art greedy heuristic approach is presented, showing that the greedy heuristic implements a stepwise selection algorithm for the 𝓁₀-norm minimization problem. Further, we present an example where our approach succeeds, whereas the standard heuristic fails to find an aggregation with desired properties. The algorithm is implemented within the constraint integer programming solver SCIP, and computational experiments on the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark show that although the algorithm leads to slowdowns on relatively "easier" instances, our aggregation approach decreases the mean running time on a subset of challenging instances and leads to smaller branch-and-bound trees.
Cite as

Liding Xu, Gioni Mexi, and Ksenia Bestuzheva. Sparsity-Driven Aggregation of Mixed Integer Programs. In 23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 338, pp. 27:1-27:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{xu_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27,
  author =	{Xu, Liding and Mexi, Gioni and Bestuzheva, Ksenia},
  title =	{{Sparsity-Driven Aggregation of Mixed Integer Programs}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-375-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{338},
  editor =	{Mutzel, Petra and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232652},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: mixed integer linear programming, cutting plane, valid inequality, separation, aggregation, projection, sparse optimization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.18
Global Benchmark Database

Authors: Ashlin Iser and Christoph Jabs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 305, 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)

Abstract
This paper presents Global Benchmark Database (GBD), a comprehensive suite of tools for provisioning and sustainably maintaining benchmark instances and their metadata. The availability of benchmark metadata is essential for many tasks in empirical research, e.g., for the data-driven compilation of benchmarks, the domain-specific analysis of runtime experiments, or the instance-specific selection of solvers. In this paper, we introduce the data model of GBD as well as its interfaces and provide examples of how to interact with them. We also demonstrate the integration of custom data sources and explain how to extend GBD with additional problem domains, instance formats and feature extractors.
Cite as

Ashlin Iser and Christoph Jabs. Global Benchmark Database. In 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 305, pp. 18:1-18:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{iser_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2024.18,
  author =	{Iser, Ashlin and Jabs, Christoph},
  title =	{{Global Benchmark Database}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-334-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{305},
  editor =	{Chakraborty, Supratik and Jiang, Jie-Hong Roland},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-205405},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maintenance and Distribution of Benchmark Instances and their Features}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2023.27
Improving Conflict Analysis in MIP Solvers by Pseudo-Boolean Reasoning

Authors: Gioni Mexi, Timo Berthold, Ambros Gleixner, and Jakob Nordström

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 280, 29th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2023)

Abstract
Conflict analysis has been successfully generalized from Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solving to mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers, but although MIP solvers operate with general linear inequalities, the conflict analysis in MIP has been limited to reasoning with the more restricted class of clausal constraint. This is in contrast to how conflict analysis is performed in so-called pseudo-Boolean solving, where solvers can reason directly with 0-1 integer linear inequalities rather than with clausal constraints extracted from such inequalities. In this work, we investigate how pseudo-Boolean conflict analysis can be integrated in MIP solving, focusing on 0-1 integer linear programs (0-1 ILPs). Phrased in MIP terminology, conflict analysis can be understood as a sequence of linear combinations and cuts. We leverage this perspective to design a new conflict analysis algorithm based on mixed integer rounding (MIR) cuts, which theoretically dominates the state-of-the-art division-based method in pseudo-Boolean solving. We also report results from a first proof-of-concept implementation of different pseudo-Boolean conflict analysis methods in the open-source MIP solver SCIP. When evaluated on a large and diverse set of 0-1 ILP instances from MIPLIB2017, our new MIR-based conflict analysis outperforms both previous pseudo-Boolean methods and the clause-based method used in MIP. Our conclusion is that pseudo-Boolean conflict analysis in MIP is a promising research direction that merits further study, and that it might also make sense to investigate the use of such conflict analysis to generate stronger no-goods in constraint programming.
Cite as

Gioni Mexi, Timo Berthold, Ambros Gleixner, and Jakob Nordström. Improving Conflict Analysis in MIP Solvers by Pseudo-Boolean Reasoning. In 29th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 280, pp. 27:1-27:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mexi_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2023.27,
  author =	{Mexi, Gioni and Berthold, Timo and Gleixner, Ambros and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  title =	{{Improving Conflict Analysis in MIP Solvers by Pseudo-Boolean Reasoning}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2023)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-300-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{280},
  editor =	{Yap, Roland H. C.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2023.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-190641},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2023.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Integer programming, pseudo-Boolean solving, conflict analysis, cutting planes proof system, mixed integer rounding, division, saturation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.8.2.64
Designing and Implementing Algorithms for Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization (Dagstuhl Seminar 18081)

Authors: Pierre Bonami, Ambros M. Gleixner, Jeff Linderoth, and Ruth Misener

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 8, Issue 2 (2018)

Abstract
Mathematical models for optimal decisions often require both nonlinear and discrete components. These mixed-integer nonlinear programs (MINLP) may be used to optimize the energy use of large industrial plants, integrate renewable sources into energy networks, design biological and biomedical systems, and address numerous other applications of societal importance. The first MINLP algorithms and software were designed by application engineers. While these efforts initially proved useful, scientists, engineers, and practitioners have realized that a transformational shift in technology will be required for MINLP to achieve its full potential. MINLP has transitioned to a forefront position in computer science, with researchers actively developing MINLP theory, algorithms, and implementations. Even with their concerted effort, algorithms and available software are often unable to solve practically-sized instances of these important models. Current obstacles include characterizing the computability boundary, effectively exploiting known optimization technologies for specialized classes of MINLP, and effectively using logical formulas holistically throughout algorithms.
Cite as

Pierre Bonami, Ambros M. Gleixner, Jeff Linderoth, and Ruth Misener. Designing and Implementing Algorithms for Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization (Dagstuhl Seminar 18081). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 64-87, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{bonami_et_al:DagRep.8.2.64,
  author =	{Bonami, Pierre and Gleixner, Ambros M. and Linderoth, Jeff and Misener, Ruth},
  title =	{{Designing and Implementing Algorithms for Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization (Dagstuhl Seminar 18081)}},
  pages =	{64--87},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{8},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Bonami, Pierre and Gleixner, Ambros M. and Linderoth, Jeff and Misener, Ruth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.8.2.64},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-92909},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.8.2.64},
  annote =	{Keywords: Complexity, Mathematical optimization, Mathematical software, Mixed-integer optimization, Nonlinear optimization, Numerical issues, Optimization algorithms}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 11 Document/PDF
  • 8 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 8 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2018

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Mexi, Gioni
  • 2 Nordström, Jakob
  • 1 Berthold, Timo
  • 1 Bestuzheva, Ksenia
  • 1 Bierlee, Hendrik
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 10 LIPIcs
  • 1 DagRep

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Mathematics of computing → Solvers
  • 3 Theory of computation → Discrete optimization
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorial optimization
  • 2 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 2 Theory of computation → Logic
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Conflict Analysis
  • 2 pseudo-Boolean solving
  • 1 0-1 integer linear programming
  • 1 Algorithm Engineering
  • 1 Complete Search
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact