DROPS

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.9

Lifting Dichotomies

Authors: Yaroslav Alekseev, Yuval Filmus, and Alexander Smal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 300, 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)

Abstract

Lifting theorems are used for transferring lower bounds between Boolean function complexity measures. Given a lower bound on a complexity measure A for some function f, we compose f with a carefully chosen gadget function g and get essentially the same lower bound on a complexity measure B for the lifted function f ⋄ g. Lifting theorems have a number of applications in many different areas such as circuit complexity, communication complexity, proof complexity, etc. One of the main question in the context of lifting is how to choose a suitable gadget g. Generally, to get better results, i.e., to minimize the losses when transferring lower bounds, we need the gadget to be of a constant size (number of inputs). Unfortunately, in many settings we know lifting results only for gadgets of size that grows with the size of f, and it is unclear whether it can be improved to a constant size gadget. This motivates us to identify the properties of gadgets that make lifting possible. In this paper, we systematically study the question "For which gadgets does the lifting result hold?" in the following four settings: lifting from decision tree depth to decision tree size, lifting from conjunction DAG width to conjunction DAG size, lifting from decision tree depth to parity decision tree depth and size, and lifting from block sensitivity to deterministic and randomized communication complexities. In all the cases, we prove the complete classification of gadgets by exposing the properties of gadgets that make lifting results hold. The structure of the results shows that there is no intermediate cases - for every gadget there is either a polynomial lifting or no lifting at all. As a byproduct of our studies, we prove the log-rank conjecture for the class of functions that can be represented as f ⋄ OR ⋄ XOR for some function f. In this extended abstract, the proofs are omitted. Full proofs are given in the full version [Yaroslav Alekseev et al., 2024].

Cite as

Yaroslav Alekseev, Yuval Filmus, and Alexander Smal. Lifting Dichotomies. In 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 300, pp. 9:1-9:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alekseev_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2024.9,
  author =	{Alekseev, Yaroslav and Filmus, Yuval and Smal, Alexander},
  title =	{{Lifting Dichotomies}},
  booktitle =	{39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-331-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{300},
  editor =	{Santhanam, Rahul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-204051},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: decision trees, log-rank conjecture, lifting, parity decision trees}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.15

Quantum Automating TC⁰-Frege Is LWE-Hard

Authors: Noel Arteche, Gaia Carenini, and Matthew Gray

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 300, 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)

Abstract

We prove the first hardness results against efficient proof search by quantum algorithms. We show that under Learning with Errors (LWE), the standard lattice-based cryptographic assumption, no quantum algorithm can weakly automate TC⁰-Frege. This extends the line of results of Krajíček and Pudlák (Information and Computation, 1998), Bonet, Pitassi, and Raz (FOCS, 1997), and Bonet, Domingo, Gavaldà, Maciel, and Pitassi (Computational Complexity, 2004), who showed that Extended Frege, TC⁰-Frege and AC⁰-Frege, respectively, cannot be weakly automated by classical algorithms if either the RSA cryptosystem or the Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol are secure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first interaction between quantum computation and propositional proof search.

Cite as

Noel Arteche, Gaia Carenini, and Matthew Gray. Quantum Automating TC⁰-Frege Is LWE-Hard. In 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 300, pp. 15:1-15:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arteche_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2024.15,
  author =	{Arteche, Noel and Carenini, Gaia and Gray, Matthew},
  title =	{{Quantum Automating TC⁰-Frege Is LWE-Hard}},
  booktitle =	{39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-331-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{300},
  editor =	{Santhanam, Rahul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-204117},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: automatability, post-quantum cryptography, feasible interpolation}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.22

Depth-d Frege Systems Are Not Automatable Unless 𝖯 = NP

Authors: Theodoros Papamakarios

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 300, 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)

Abstract

We show that for any integer d > 0, depth-d Frege systems are NP-hard to automate. Namely, given a set S of depth-d formulas, it is NP-hard to find a depth-d Frege refutation of S in time polynomial in the size of the shortest such refutation. This extends the result of Atserias and Müller [JACM, 2020] for the non-automatability of resolution - a depth-1 Frege system - to Frege systems of any depth d > 0.

Cite as

Theodoros Papamakarios. Depth-d Frege Systems Are Not Automatable Unless 𝖯 = NP. In 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 300, pp. 22:1-22:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{papamakarios:LIPIcs.CCC.2024.22,
  author =	{Papamakarios, Theodoros},
  title =	{{Depth-d Frege Systems Are Not Automatable Unless 𝖯 = NP}},
  booktitle =	{39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-331-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{300},
  editor =	{Santhanam, Rahul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-204187},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof complexity, Automatability, Bounded-depth Frege}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.23

Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities

Authors: Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya, Arkadev Chattopadhyay, and Pavel Dvořák

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 300, 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)

Abstract

Proving super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of proofs of unsatisfiability of Boolean formulas using resolution over parities is an outstanding problem that has received a lot of attention after its introduction by Itsykson and Sokolov [Dmitry Itsykson and Dmitry Sokolov, 2014]. Very recently, Efremenko, Garlík and Itsykson [Klim Efremenko et al., 2023] proved the first exponential lower bounds on the size of ResLin proofs that were additionally restricted to be bottom-regular. We show that there are formulas for which such regular ResLin proofs of unsatisfiability continue to have exponential size even though there exist short proofs of their unsatisfiability in ordinary, non-regular resolution. This is the first super-polynomial separation between the power of general ResLin and that of regular ResLin for any natural notion of regularity. Our argument, while building upon the work of Efremenko et al. [Klim Efremenko et al., 2023], uses additional ideas from the literature on lifting theorems.

Cite as

Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya, Arkadev Chattopadhyay, and Pavel Dvořák. Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities. In 39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 300, pp. 23:1-23:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bhattacharya_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2024.23,
  author =	{Bhattacharya, Sreejata Kishor and Chattopadhyay, Arkadev and Dvo\v{r}\'{a}k, Pavel},
  title =	{{Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution over Parities}},
  booktitle =	{39th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2024)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:32},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-331-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{300},
  editor =	{Santhanam, Rahul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-204191},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2024.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof Complexity, Regular Reslin, Branching Programs, Lifting}
}

Document

Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.12

From Proof Complexity to Circuit Complexity via Interactive Protocols

Authors: Noel Arteche, Erfan Khaniki, Ján Pich, and Rahul Santhanam

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 297, 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)

Abstract

Folklore in complexity theory suspects that circuit lower bounds against NC¹ or P/poly, currently out of reach, are a necessary step towards proving strong proof complexity lower bounds for systems like Frege or Extended Frege. Establishing such a connection formally, however, is already daunting, as it would imply the breakthrough separation NEXP ⊈ P/poly, as recently observed by Pich and Santhanam [Pich and Santhanam, 2023]. We show such a connection conditionally for the Implicit Extended Frege proof system (iEF) introduced by Krajíček [Krajíček, 2004], capable of formalizing most of contemporary complexity theory. In particular, we show that if iEF proves efficiently the standard derandomization assumption that a concrete Boolean function is hard on average for subexponential-size circuits, then any superpolynomial lower bound on the length of iEF proofs implies #P ⊈ FP/poly (which would in turn imply, for example, PSPACE ⊈ P/poly). Our proof exploits the formalization inside iEF of the soundness of the sum-check protocol of Lund, Fortnow, Karloff, and Nisan [Lund et al., 1992]. This has consequences for the self-provability of circuit upper bounds in iEF. Interestingly, further improving our result seems to require progress in constructing interactive proof systems with more efficient provers.

Cite as

Noel Arteche, Erfan Khaniki, Ján Pich, and Rahul Santhanam. From Proof Complexity to Circuit Complexity via Interactive Protocols. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 12:1-12:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arteche_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.12,
  author =	{Arteche, Noel and Khaniki, Erfan and Pich, J\'{a}n and Santhanam, Rahul},
  title =	{{From Proof Complexity to Circuit Complexity via Interactive Protocols}},
  booktitle =	{51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-322-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{297},
  editor =	{Bringmann, Karl and Grohe, Martin and Puppis, Gabriele and Svensson, Ola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-201557},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, circuit complexity, interactive protocols}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48

Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas

Authors: Yuval Filmus, Edward A. Hirsch, Artur Riazanov, Alexander Smal, and Marc Vinyals

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 287, 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)

Abstract

A hitting formula is a set of Boolean clauses such that any two of the clauses cannot be simultaneously falsified. Hitting formulas have been studied in many different contexts at least since [Iwama, 1989] and, based on experimental evidence, Peitl and Szeider [Tomás Peitl and Stefan Szeider, 2022] conjectured that unsatisfiable hitting formulas are among the hardest for resolution. Using the fact that hitting formulas are easy to check for satisfiability we make them the foundation of a new static proof system {{rmHitting}}: a refutation of a CNF in {{rmHitting}} is an unsatisfiable hitting formula such that each of its clauses is a weakening of a clause of the refuted CNF. Comparing this system to resolution and other proof systems is equivalent to studying the hardness of hitting formulas. Our first result is that {{rmHitting}} is quasi-polynomially simulated by tree-like resolution, which means that hitting formulas cannot be exponentially hard for resolution and partially refutes the conjecture of Peitl and Szeider. We show that tree-like resolution and {{rmHitting}} are quasi-polynomially separated, while for resolution, this question remains open. For a system that is only quasi-polynomially stronger than tree-like resolution, {{rmHitting}} is surprisingly difficult to polynomially simulate in another proof system. Using the ideas of Raz-Shpilka’s polynomial identity testing for noncommutative circuits [Raz and Shpilka, 2005] we show that {{rmHitting}} is p-simulated by {{rmExtended {{rmFrege}}}}, but we conjecture that much more efficient simulations exist. As a byproduct, we show that a number of static (semi)algebraic systems are verifiable in deterministic polynomial time. We consider multiple extensions of {{rmHitting}}, and in particular a proof system {{{rmHitting}}(⊕)} related to the {{{rmRes}}(⊕)} proof system for which no superpolynomial-size lower bounds are known. {{{rmHitting}}(⊕)} p-simulates the tree-like version of {{{rmRes}}(⊕)} and is at least quasi-polynomially stronger. We show that formulas expressing the non-existence of perfect matchings in the graphs K_{n,n+2} are exponentially hard for {{{rmHitting}}(⊕)} via a reduction to the partition bound for communication complexity. See the full version of the paper for the proofs. They are omitted in this Extended Abstract.

Cite as

Yuval Filmus, Edward A. Hirsch, Artur Riazanov, Alexander Smal, and Marc Vinyals. Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas. In 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 287, pp. 48:1-48:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{filmus_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48,
  author =	{Filmus, Yuval and Hirsch, Edward A. and Riazanov, Artur and Smal, Alexander and Vinyals, Marc},
  title =	{{Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas}},
  booktitle =	{15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)},
  pages =	{48:1--48:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-309-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{287},
  editor =	{Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-195762},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48},
  annote =	{Keywords: hitting formulas, polynomial identity testing, query complexity}
}

Document

RANDOM

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.36

Sampling and Certifying Symmetric Functions

Authors: Yuval Filmus, Itai Leigh, Artur Riazanov, and Dmitry Sokolov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 275, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023)

Abstract

A circuit 𝒞 samples a distribution X with an error ε if the statistical distance between the output of 𝒞 on the uniform input and X is ε. We study the hardness of sampling a uniform distribution over the set of n-bit strings of Hamming weight k denoted by Uⁿ_k for decision forests, i.e. every output bit is computed as a decision tree of the inputs. For every k there is an O(log n)-depth decision forest sampling Uⁿ_k with an inverse-polynomial error [Emanuele Viola, 2012; Czumaj, 2015]. We show that for every ε > 0 there exists τ such that for decision depth τ log (n/k) / log log (n/k), the error for sampling U_kⁿ is at least 1-ε. Our result is based on the recent robust sunflower lemma [Ryan Alweiss et al., 2021; Rao, 2019]. Our second result is about matching a set of n-bit strings with the image of a d-local circuit, i.e. such that each output bit depends on at most d input bits. We study the set of all n-bit strings whose Hamming weight is at least n/2. We improve the previously known locality lower bound from Ω(log^* n) [Beyersdorff et al., 2013] to Ω(√log n), leaving only a quartic gap from the best upper bound of O(log² n).

Cite as

Yuval Filmus, Itai Leigh, Artur Riazanov, and Dmitry Sokolov. Sampling and Certifying Symmetric Functions. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 275, pp. 36:1-36:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{filmus_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.36,
  author =	{Filmus, Yuval and Leigh, Itai and Riazanov, Artur and Sokolov, Dmitry},
  title =	{{Sampling and Certifying Symmetric Functions}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-296-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{275},
  editor =	{Megow, Nicole and Smith, Adam},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-188611},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: sampling, lower bounds, robust sunflowers, decision trees, switching networks}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.72

OBDD(Join) Proofs Cannot Be Balanced

Authors: Sergei Ovcharov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 272, 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)

Abstract

We study OBDD-based propositional proof systems introduced in 2004 by Atserias, Kolaitis, and Vardi that prove the unsatisfiability of a CNF formula by deduction of an identically false OBDD from OBDDs representing clauses of the initial formula. We consider a proof system OBDD(∧) that uses only the conjunction (join) rule and a proof system OBDD(∧, reordering) (introduced in 2017 by Itsykson, Knop, Romashchenko, and Sokolov) that uses the conjunction (join) rule and the rule that allows changing the order of variables in OBDD. We study whether these systems can be balanced i.e. every refutation of size S can be reassembled into a refutation of depth O(log S) with at most a polynomial-size increase. We construct a family of unsatisfiable CNF formulas F_n such that F_n has a polynomial-size tree-like OBDD(∧) refutation of depth poly(n) and for arbitrary OBDD(∧, reordering) refutation Π of F_n for every α ∈ (0,1) the following trade-off holds: either the size of Π is 2^Ω(n^α) or the depth of Π is Ω(n^{1-α}). As a corollary of the trade-offs, we get that OBDD(∧) and OBDD(∧, reordering) proofs cannot be balanced.

Cite as

Sergei Ovcharov. OBDD(Join) Proofs Cannot Be Balanced. In 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 272, pp. 72:1-72:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ovcharov:LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.72,
  author =	{Ovcharov, Sergei},
  title =	{{OBDD(Join) Proofs Cannot Be Balanced}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)},
  pages =	{72:1--72:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-292-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{272},
  editor =	{Leroux, J\'{e}r\^{o}me and Lombardy, Sylvain and Peleg, David},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.72},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-186065},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.72},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof complexity, OBDD, lower bounds, depth of proofs}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7

Lower Bounds for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Variables over Finite Fields

Authors: Russell Impagliazzo, Sasank Mouli, and Toniann Pitassi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 264, 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)

Abstract

For every prime p > 0, every n > 0 and κ = O(log n), we show the existence of an unsatisfiable system of polynomial equations over O(n log n) variables of degree O(log n) such that any Polynomial Calculus refutation over 𝔽_p with M extension variables, each depending on at most κ original variables requires size exp(Ω(n²)/10^κ(M + n log n))

Cite as

Russell Impagliazzo, Sasank Mouli, and Toniann Pitassi. Lower Bounds for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Variables over Finite Fields. In 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 264, pp. 7:1-7:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{impagliazzo_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7,
  author =	{Impagliazzo, Russell and Mouli, Sasank and Pitassi, Toniann},
  title =	{{Lower Bounds for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Variables over Finite Fields}},
  booktitle =	{38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-282-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{264},
  editor =	{Ta-Shma, Amnon},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-182774},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof complexity, Algebraic proof systems, Polynomial Calculus, Extension variables, AC⁰\lbrackp\rbrack-Frege}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.59

Automating OBDD proofs is NP-hard

Authors: Dmitry Itsykson and Artur Riazanov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 241, 47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022)

Abstract

We prove that the proof system OBDD(∧, weakening) is not automatable unless P = NP. The proof is based upon the celebrated result of [Albert Atserias and Moritz Müller, 2019] about the hardness of automatability for resolution. The heart of the proof is lifting with multi-output indexing gadget from resolution block-width to dag-like multiparty number-in-hand communication protocol size with o(n) parties, where n is the number of variables in the non-lifted formula. A similar lifting theorem for protocols with n+1 participants was proved by [Göös et al., 2020] to establish the hardness of automatability result for Cutting Planes.

Cite as

Dmitry Itsykson and Artur Riazanov. Automating OBDD proofs is NP-hard. In 47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 241, pp. 59:1-59:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{itsykson_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.59,
  author =	{Itsykson, Dmitry and Riazanov, Artur},
  title =	{{Automating OBDD proofs is NP-hard}},
  booktitle =	{47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022)},
  pages =	{59:1--59:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-256-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{241},
  editor =	{Szeider, Stefan and Ganian, Robert and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.59},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-168575},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2022.59},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, OBDD, automatability, lifting, dag-like communication}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.15

Pseudorandom Generators, Resolution and Heavy Width

Authors: Dmitry Sokolov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 234, 37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022)

Abstract

Following the paper of Alekhnovich, Ben-Sasson, Razborov, Wigderson [Michael Alekhnovich et al., 2004] we call a pseudorandom generator ℱ:{0, 1}ⁿ → {0, 1}^m hard for a propositional proof system P if P cannot efficiently prove the (properly encoded) statement b ∉ Im(ℱ) for any string b ∈ {0, 1}^m. In [Michael Alekhnovich et al., 2004] the authors suggested the "functional encoding" of the considered statement for Nisan-Wigderson generator that allows the introduction of "local" extension variables. These extension variables may potentially significantly increase the power of the proof system. In [Michael Alekhnovich et al., 2004] authors gave a lower bound of exp[Ω(n²/{m⋅2^{2^Δ}})] on the length of Resolution proofs where Δ is the degree of the dependency graph of the generator. This lower bound meets the barrier for the restriction technique. In this paper, we introduce a "heavy width" measure for Resolution that allows us to show a lower bound of exp[n²/{m 2^𝒪(εΔ)}] on the length of Resolution proofs of the considered statement for the Nisan-Wigderson generator. This gives an exponential lower bound up to Δ := log^{2 - δ} n (the bigger degree the more extension variables we can use). In [Michael Alekhnovich et al., 2004] authors left an open problem to get rid of scaling factor 2^{2^Δ}, it is a solution to this open problem.

Cite as

Dmitry Sokolov. Pseudorandom Generators, Resolution and Heavy Width. In 37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 234, pp. 15:1-15:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sokolov:LIPIcs.CCC.2022.15,
  author =	{Sokolov, Dmitry},
  title =	{{Pseudorandom Generators, Resolution and Heavy Width}},
  booktitle =	{37th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2022)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-241-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{234},
  editor =	{Lovett, Shachar},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-165770},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2022.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, pseudorandom generators, resolution, lower bounds}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.3

Proof Complexity of Natural Formulas via Communication Arguments

Authors: Dmitry Itsykson and Artur Riazanov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 200, 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)

Abstract

A canonical communication problem Search(φ) is defined for every unsatisfiable CNF φ: an assignment to the variables of φ is partitioned among the communicating parties, they are to find a clause of φ falsified by this assignment. Lower bounds on the randomized k-party communication complexity of Search(φ) in the number-on-forehead (NOF) model imply tree-size lower bounds, rank lower bounds, and size-space tradeoffs for the formula φ in the semantic proof system T^{cc}(k,c) that operates with proof lines that can be computed by k-party randomized communication protocol using at most c bits of communication [Göös and Pitassi, 2014]. All known lower bounds on Search(φ) (e.g. [Beame et al., 2007; Göös and Pitassi, 2014; Russell Impagliazzo et al., 1994]) are realized on ad-hoc formulas φ (i.e. they were introduced specifically for these lower bounds). We introduce a new communication complexity approach that allows establishing proof complexity lower bounds for natural formulas. First, we demonstrate our approach for two-party communication and apply it to the proof system Res(⊕) that operates with disjunctions of linear equalities over 𝔽₂ [Dmitry Itsykson and Dmitry Sokolov, 2014]. Let a formula PM_G encode that a graph G has a perfect matching. If G has an odd number of vertices, then PM_G has a tree-like Res(⊕)-refutation of a polynomial-size [Dmitry Itsykson and Dmitry Sokolov, 2014]. It was unknown whether this is the case for graphs with an even number of vertices. Using our approach we resolve this question and show a lower bound 2^{Ω(n)} on size of tree-like Res(⊕)-refutations of PM_{K_{n+2,n}}. Then we apply our approach for k-party communication complexity in the NOF model and obtain a Ω(1/k 2^{n/2k - 3k/2}) lower bound on the randomized k-party communication complexity of Search(BPHP^{M}_{2ⁿ}) w.r.t. to some natural partition of the variables, where BPHP^{M}_{2ⁿ} is the bit pigeonhole principle and M = 2ⁿ+2^{n(1-1/k)}. In particular, our result implies that the bit pigeonhole requires exponential tree-like Th(k) proofs, where Th(k) is the semantic proof system operating with polynomial inequalities of degree at most k and k = 𝒪(log^{1-ε} n) for some ε > 0. We also show that BPHP^{2ⁿ+1}_{2ⁿ} superpolynomially separates tree-like Th(log^{1-ε} m) from tree-like Th(log m), where m is the number of variables in the refuted formula.

Cite as

Dmitry Itsykson and Artur Riazanov. Proof Complexity of Natural Formulas via Communication Arguments. In 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 200, pp. 3:1-3:34, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{itsykson_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2021.3,
  author =	{Itsykson, Dmitry and Riazanov, Artur},
  title =	{{Proof Complexity of Natural Formulas via Communication Arguments}},
  booktitle =	{36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:34},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-193-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{200},
  editor =	{Kabanets, Valentine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-142773},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: bit pigeonhole principle, disjointness, multiparty communication complexity, perfect matching, proof complexity, randomized communication complexity, Resolution over linear equations, tree-like proofs}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.17

Branching Programs with Bounded Repetitions and Flow Formulas

Authors: Anastasia Sofronova and Dmitry Sokolov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 200, 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)

Abstract

Restricted branching programs capture various complexity measures like space in Turing machines or length of proofs in proof systems. In this paper, we focus on the application in the proof complexity that was discovered by Lovasz et al. [László Lovász et al., 1995] who showed the equivalence between regular Resolution and read-once branching programs for "unsatisfied clause search problem" (Search_φ). This connection is widely used, in particular, in the recent breakthrough result about the Clique problem in regular Resolution by Atserias et al. [Albert Atserias et al., 2018]. We study the branching programs with bounded repetitions, so-called (1,+k)-BPs (Sieling [Detlef Sieling, 1996]) in application to the Search_φ problem. On the one hand, it is a natural generalization of read-once branching programs. On the other hand, this model gives a powerful proof system that can efficiently certify the unsatisfiability of a wide class of formulas that is hard for Resolution (Knop [Alexander Knop, 2017]). We deal with Search_φ that is "relatively easy" compared to all known hard examples for the (1,+k)-BPs. We introduce the first technique for proving exponential lower bounds for the (1,+k)-BPs on Search_φ. To do it we combine a well-known technique for proving lower bounds on the size of branching programs [Detlef Sieling, 1996; Detlef Sieling and Ingo Wegener, 1994; Stasys Jukna and Alexander A. Razborov, 1998] with the modification of the "closure" technique [Michael Alekhnovich et al., 2004; Michael Alekhnovich and Alexander A. Razborov, 2003]. In contrast with most Resolution lower bounds, our technique uses not only "local" properties of the formula, but also a "global" structure. Our hard examples are based on the Flow formulas introduced in [Michael Alekhnovich and Alexander A. Razborov, 2003].

Cite as

Anastasia Sofronova and Dmitry Sokolov. Branching Programs with Bounded Repetitions and Flow Formulas. In 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 200, pp. 17:1-17:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sofronova_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2021.17,
  author =	{Sofronova, Anastasia and Sokolov, Dmitry},
  title =	{{Branching Programs with Bounded Repetitions and Flow Formulas}},
  booktitle =	{36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-193-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{200},
  editor =	{Kabanets, Valentine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-142915},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, branching programs, bounded repetitions, lower bounds}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.21

A Lower Bound for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Rule

Authors: Yaroslav Alekseev

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 200, 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)

Abstract

A major proof complexity problem is to prove a superpolynomial lower bound on the length of Frege proofs of arbitrary depth. A more general question is to prove an Extended Frege lower bound. Surprisingly, proving such bounds turns out to be much easier in the algebraic setting. In this paper, we study a proof system that can simulate Extended Frege: an extension of the Polynomial Calculus proof system where we can take a square root and introduce new variables that are equivalent to arbitrary depth algebraic circuits. We prove that an instance of the subset-sum principle, the binary value principle 1 + x₁ + 2 x₂ + … + 2^{n-1} x_n = 0 (BVP_n), requires refutations of exponential bit size over ℚ in this system. Part and Tzameret [Fedor Part and Iddo Tzameret, 2020] proved an exponential lower bound on the size of Res-Lin (Resolution over linear equations [Ran Raz and Iddo Tzameret, 2008]) refutations of BVP_n. We show that our system p-simulates Res-Lin and thus we get an alternative exponential lower bound for the size of Res-Lin refutations of BVP_n.

Cite as

Yaroslav Alekseev. A Lower Bound for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Rule. In 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 200, pp. 21:1-21:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alekseev:LIPIcs.CCC.2021.21,
  author =	{Alekseev, Yaroslav},
  title =	{{A Lower Bound for Polynomial Calculus with Extension Rule}},
  booktitle =	{36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-193-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{200},
  editor =	{Kabanets, Valentine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-142959},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, algebraic proofs, polynomial calculus}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.40

The Power of Negative Reasoning

Authors: Susanna F. de Rezende, Massimo Lauria, Jakob Nordström, and Dmitry Sokolov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 200, 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)

Abstract

Semialgebraic proof systems have been studied extensively in proof complexity since the late 1990s to understand the power of Gröbner basis computations, linear and semidefinite programming hierarchies, and other methods. Such proof systems are defined alternately with only the original variables of the problem and with special formal variables for positive and negative literals, but there seems to have been no study how these different definitions affect the power of the proof systems. We show for Nullstellensatz, polynomial calculus, Sherali-Adams, and sums-of-squares that adding formal variables for negative literals makes the proof systems exponentially stronger, with respect to the number of terms in the proofs. These separations are witnessed by CNF formulas that are easy for resolution, which establishes that polynomial calculus, Sherali-Adams, and sums-of-squares cannot efficiently simulate resolution without having access to variables for negative literals.

Cite as

Susanna F. de Rezende, Massimo Lauria, Jakob Nordström, and Dmitry Sokolov. The Power of Negative Reasoning. In 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 200, pp. 40:1-40:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{derezende_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2021.40,
  author =	{de Rezende, Susanna F. and Lauria, Massimo and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob and Sokolov, Dmitry},
  title =	{{The Power of Negative Reasoning}},
  booktitle =	{36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021)},
  pages =	{40:1--40:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-193-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{200},
  editor =	{Kabanets, Valentine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.40},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-143140},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.40},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof complexity, Polynomial calculus, Nullstellensatz, Sums-of-squares, Sherali-Adams}
}

23 Search Results for "Sokolov, Dmitry"

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as

Abstract

Cite as