12 Search Results for "Woltran, Stefan"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32
The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set

Authors: Mario Grobler and Sebastian Siebertz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
The 10th iteration of the of the Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments challenge (PACE) 2025 was devoted to engineer algorithms solving the Dominating Set problem as well as the Hitting Set problem. In contrast to the last iterations, these problems are (under standard assumptions) not fixed-parameter tractable (fpt) in general. However, restricting the structure of the input (e.g. to planar graphs or degenerate graphs for Dominating Set, or to set systems with sets of bounded size for Hitting Set) renders these problems fpt. Following the spirit of the last iterations of the PACE challenge, there is an exact track and a heuristic track for each problem; each track coming with a benchmark set of 100 public instances and 100 private instances. Overall, the PACE 2025 had 71 participants from 25 teams, 13 countries, and 3 continents. In this report, we briefly describe the setup of the challenge, the selection of benchmark instances, as well as the ranking of the participating teams. We also briefly outline the approaches used in the submitted solvers.
Cite as

Mario Grobler and Sebastian Siebertz. The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 32:1-32:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grobler_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32,
  author =	{Grobler, Mario and Siebertz, Sebastian},
  title =	{{The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251644},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: PACE 2025 Report, Dominating Set, Hitting Set, Algorithm Engineering, FPT, Heuristics}
}
Document
PACE Solver Description
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.35
PACE Solver Description: Bad Dominating Set Maker

Authors: Alexander Dobler, Simon Dominik Fink, and Mathis Rocton

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
Dominating Set and Hitting Set are two well-known NP-hard problems on graphs and hypergraphs, respectively. For Dominating Set, we seek a subset S of vertices of minimum size, such that every vertex has a neighbor in S. For Hitting Set, we require that this minimum size subset S intersects each hyperedge. We present Bad Dominating Set Maker, our solver for both problems posed in the exact tracks of the 2025 PACE Challenge. It uses reduction rules, dynamic programming on tree decompositions, and external Vertex Cover and SAT solvers.
Cite as

Alexander Dobler, Simon Dominik Fink, and Mathis Rocton. PACE Solver Description: Bad Dominating Set Maker. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 35:1-35:5, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dobler_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.35,
  author =	{Dobler, Alexander and Fink, Simon Dominik and Rocton, Mathis},
  title =	{{PACE Solver Description: Bad Dominating Set Maker}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:5},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251673},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dominating Set, Hitting Set, Pace Challenge}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9
Reasoning About Time in DatalogMTL: Course Notes (Invited Paper)

Authors: Przemysław Andrzej Wałęga

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
Many real-world applications, such as those in healthcare, finance, and logistics, require reasoning over temporal data. Standard rule-based languages like Datalog, however, lack explicit mechanisms for handling time and temporal dependencies. In this chapter, we discussDatalogMTL, an extension of Datalog with operators frommetric temporal logic that allow to express complex temporal properties. We focus on reasoning algorithms for DatalogMTL, discussing bothmaterialisation, based on fixpoint applications of the immediate consequence operator, and anovel saturation-based extensionthat detects and halts infinite derivations, ensuring both completeness and termination of reasoning.
Cite as

Przemysław Andrzej Wałęga. Reasoning About Time in DatalogMTL: Course Notes (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 9:1-9:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{walega:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9,
  author =	{Wa{\l}\k{e}ga, Przemys{\l}aw Andrzej},
  title =	{{Reasoning About Time in DatalogMTL: Course Notes}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:23},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250546},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: DatalogMTL, Logic Programming, Temporal Reasoning}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7
Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper)

Authors: Markus Krötzsch

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
Pure Datalog is arguably the most fundamental rule language, elegant and simple, but also often too limited to be useful in practice. This has motivated the introduction of many new expressive features, ranging from datatypes and related functions, over aggregates and semi-ring generalisations, to existential quantifiers and complex terms. In spite of their variety, all these approaches remain true to the nature of Datalog as a direct, pattern-based way of computing on structured data. We therefore find that a modern notion of Datalog is emerging, distinctly different from other approaches of logic programming and with its own set of related methods and applications. In this course, we introduce Datalog and its most common extensions, and explain when and how these features can be used together (which is often, but not always, safe to do). We further look at modern Datalog systems and some of their primary use cases. Hands-on work with Datalog and its extensions is done with the free Datalog engine https://knowsys.github.io/nemo-doc/. The course is accessible to all audiences and does not assume specific prior knowledge.
Cite as

Markus Krötzsch. Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 7:1-7:41, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{krotzsch:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7,
  author =	{Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
  title =	{{Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:41},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250524},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Datalog, query language, knowlegde representation and reasoning, logic programming, Horn logic, SPARQL, datatypes and aggregation, lecture notes, tutorial}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.105
Parameterized Algorithms for Computing Pareto Sets

Authors: Joshua Marc Könen, Heiko Röglin, and Tarek Stuck

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
The problem of computing the set of Pareto-optimal solutions has been studied for a variety of multiobjective optimization problems. For many such problems, algorithms are known that compute the Pareto set in (weak) output-polynomial time. These algorithms are often based on dynamic programming and by weak output-polynomial time, we mean that the running time depends polynomially on the size of the Pareto set but also on the sizes of the Pareto sets of the subproblems that occur in the dynamic program. For some problems, like the multiobjective minimum spanning tree problem, such algorithms are not known to exist and for other problems, like multiobjective versions of many NP-hard problems, such algorithms cannot exist, unless 𝒫 = 𝒩𝒫. Dynamic programming over tree decompositions is a common technique in parameterized algorithms. In this paper, we study whether this technique can also be applied to compute Pareto sets of multiobjective optimization problems. We first derive an algorithm to compute the Pareto set for the multicriteria s-t cut problem and show how this result can be applied to a polygon aggregation problem arising in cartography that has recently been introduced by Rottmann et al. (GIScience 2021). We also show how to apply these techniques to also compute the Pareto set of the multiobjective minimum spanning tree problem and for the multiobjective TSP. The running time of our algorithms is O(f(w)⋅poly(n,p_{max})), where f is some function in the treewidth w, n is the input size, and p_{max} is an upper bound on the size of the Pareto sets of the subproblems that occur in the dynamic program. Finally, we present an experimental evaluation of computing Pareto sets on real-world instances of polygon aggregation problems. For this matter we devised a task-specific data structure that allows for efficient storage and modification of large sets of Pareto-optimal solutions. Throughout the implementation process, we incorporated several improved strategies and heuristics that significantly reduced both runtime and memory usage, enabling us to solve instances with treewidth of up to 22 within reasonable amount of time. Moreover, we conducted a preprocessing study to compare different tree decompositions in terms of their estimated overall runtime.
Cite as

Joshua Marc Könen, Heiko Röglin, and Tarek Stuck. Parameterized Algorithms for Computing Pareto Sets. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 105:1-105:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{konen_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.105,
  author =	{K\"{o}nen, Joshua Marc and R\"{o}glin, Heiko and Stuck, Tarek},
  title =	{{Parameterized Algorithms for Computing Pareto Sets}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{105:1--105:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.105},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245749},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.105},
  annote =	{Keywords: parameterized algorithms, treewidth, multicriteria optimization problems, multicriteria MST, multicriteria TSP, polygon aggregation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17
Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks

Authors: Mohimenul Kabir, Van-Giang Trinh, Samuel Pastva, and Kuldeep S Meel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Boolean Networks (BNs) serve as a fundamental modeling framework for capturing complex dynamical systems across various domains, including systems biology, computational logic, and artificial intelligence. A crucial property of BNs is the presence of trap spaces - subspaces of the state space that, once entered, cannot be exited. Minimal trap spaces, in particular, play a significant role in analyzing the long-term behavior of BNs, making their efficient enumeration and counting essential. The fixed points in BNs are a special case of minimal trap spaces. In this work, we formulate several meaningful counting problems related to minimal trap spaces and fixed points in BNs. These problems provide valuable insights both within BN theory (e.g., in probabilistic reasoning and dynamical analysis) and in broader application areas, including systems biology, abstract argumentation, and logic programming. To address these computational challenges, we propose novel methods based on approximate answer set counting, leveraging techniques from answer set programming. Our approach efficiently approximates the number of minimal trap spaces and the number of fixed points without requiring exhaustive enumeration, making it particularly well-suited for large-scale BNs. Our experimental evaluation on an extensive and diverse set of benchmark instances shows that our methods significantly improve the feasibility of counting minimal trap spaces and fixed points, paving the way for new applications in BN analysis and beyond.
Cite as

Mohimenul Kabir, Van-Giang Trinh, Samuel Pastva, and Kuldeep S Meel. Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 17:1-17:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kabir_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.17,
  author =	{Kabir, Mohimenul and Trinh, Van-Giang and Pastva, Samuel and Meel, Kuldeep S},
  title =	{{Scalable Counting of Minimal Trap Spaces and Fixed Points in Boolean Networks}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238780},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computational systems biology, Boolean network, Fixed point, Trap space, Answer set counting, Projected counting, Abstract argumentation, Logic programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.8
Certifying Projected Knowledge Compilation

Authors: Randal E. Bryant, Yong Kiam Tan, and Marijn J. H. Heule

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Knowledge compilers convert Boolean formulas, given in conjunctive normal form (CNF), into representations that enable efficient evaluation of unweighted and weighted model counts, as well as a variety of other useful properties. With projected knowledge compilation, the generated representation describes the restriction of the formula to a designated set of data variables, with the remaining ones eliminated by existential quantification. Projected knowledge compilation has applications in a variety of domains, including formal verification and synthesis. This paper describes a formally verified proof framework for certifying the output of a projected knowledge compiler. It builds on an earlier clausal proof framework for certifying the output of a standard knowledge compiler. Extending the framework to projected compilation requires a method to represent Skolem assignments, describing how the quantified variables can be assigned, given an assignment for the data variables. We do so by extending the representation generated by the knowledge compiler to also encode Skolem assignments. We also refine the earlier framework, moving beyond purely clausal proofs to enable scaling certification to larger formulas. We present experimental results obtained by making small modifications to the D4 projected knowledge compiler and extensions of our earlier proof generator. We detail a soundness argument stating that a compiler output that passes our certifier is logically equivalent to the quantified input formula; the soundness argument has been formally validated using the HOL4 proof assistant. The checker also ensures that the compiler output satisfies the properties required for efficient unweighted and weighted model counting. We have developed two proof checkers for the certification framework: one written in C and designed for high performance and one written in CakeML and formally verified in HOL4.
Cite as

Randal E. Bryant, Yong Kiam Tan, and Marijn J. H. Heule. Certifying Projected Knowledge Compilation. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 8:1-8:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bryant_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.8,
  author =	{Bryant, Randal E. and Tan, Yong Kiam and Heule, Marijn J. H.},
  title =	{{Certifying Projected Knowledge Compilation}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237422},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Compilation, Propositional model counting, Proof checking}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.15
Structure-Guided Automated Reasoning

Authors: Max Bannach and Markus Hecher

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
Algorithmic meta-theorems state that problems definable in a fixed logic can be solved efficiently on structures with certain properties. An example is Courcelle’s Theorem, which states that all problems expressible in monadic second-order logic can be solved efficiently on structures of small treewidth. Such theorems are usually proven by algorithms for the model-checking problem of the logic, which is often complex and rarely leads to highly efficient solutions. Alternatively, we can solve the model-checking problem by grounding the given logic to propositional logic, for which dedicated solvers are available. Such encodings will, however, usually not preserve the input’s treewidth. This paper investigates whether all problems definable in monadic second-order logic can efficiently be encoded into SAT such that the input’s treewidth bounds the treewidth of the resulting formula. We answer this in the affirmative and, hence, provide an alternative proof of Courcelle’s Theorem. Our technique can naturally be extended: There are treewidth-aware reductions from the optimization version of Courcelle’s Theorem to MAXSAT and from the counting version of the theorem to #SAT. By using encodings to SAT, we obtain, ignoring polynomial factors, the same running time for the model-checking problem as we would with dedicated algorithms. Another immediate consequence is a treewidth-preserving reduction from the model-checking problem of monadic second-order logic to integer linear programming (ILP). We complement our upper bounds with new lower bounds based on ETH; and we show that the block size of the input’s formula and the treewidth of the input’s structure are tightly linked. Finally, we present various side results needed to prove the main theorems: A treewidth-preserving cardinality constraints, treewidth-preserving encodings from CNFs into DNFs, and a treewidth-aware quantifier elimination scheme for QBF implying a treewidth-preserving reduction from QSAT to SAT. We also present a reduction from projected model counting to #SAT that increases the treewidth by at most a factor of 2^{k+3.59}, yielding a algorithm for projected model counting that beats the currently best running time of 2^{2^{k+4}}⋅poly(|ψ|).
Cite as

Max Bannach and Markus Hecher. Structure-Guided Automated Reasoning. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 15:1-15:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bannach_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.15,
  author =	{Bannach, Max and Hecher, Markus},
  title =	{{Structure-Guided Automated Reasoning}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228408},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: automated reasoning, treewidth, satisfiability, max-sat, sharp-sat, monadic second-order logic, fixed-parameter tractability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1
Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282)

Authors: James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Frank Wolter

Published in: Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2024)

Abstract
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning is a central, longstanding, and active area of Artificial Intelligence. Over the years it has evolved significantly; more recently it has been challenged and complemented by research in areas such as machine learning and reasoning under uncertainty. In July 2022,sser a Dagstuhl Perspectives workshop was held on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. The goal of the workshop was to describe the state of the art in the field, including its relation with other areas, its shortcomings and strengths, together with recommendations for future progress. We developed this manifesto based on the presentations, panels, working groups, and discussions that took place at the Dagstuhl Workshop. It is a declaration of our views on Knowledge Representation: its origins, goals, milestones, and current foci; its relation to other disciplines, especially to Artificial Intelligence; and on its challenges, along with key priorities for the next decade.
Cite as

James P. Delgrande, Birte Glimm, Thomas Meyer, Miroslaw Truszczynski, and Frank Wolter. Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282). In Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 1-61, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{delgrande_et_al:DagMan.10.1.1,
  author =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Wolter, Frank},
  title =	{{Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 22282)}},
  pages =	{1--61},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Manifestos},
  ISSN =	{2193-2433},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Delgrande, James P. and Glimm, Birte and Meyer, Thomas and Truszczynski, Miroslaw and Wolter, Frank},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-201403},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagMan.10.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge representation and reasoning, Applications of logics, Declarative representations, Formal logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2018.28
Weighted Model Counting on the GPU by Exploiting Small Treewidth

Authors: Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Stefan Woltran, and Markus Zisser

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 112, 26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2018)

Abstract
We propose a novel solver that efficiently finds almost the exact number of solutions of a Boolean formula (#Sat) and the weighted model count of a weighted Boolean formula (WMC) if the treewidth of the given formula is sufficiently small. The basis of our approach are dynamic programming algorithms on tree decompositions, which we engineered towards efficient parallel execution on the GPU. We provide thorough experiments and compare the runtime of our system with state-of-the-art #Sat and WMC solvers. Our results are encouraging in the sense that also complex reasoning problems can be tackled by parameterized algorithms executed on the GPU if instances have treewidth at most 30, which is the case for more than half of counting and weighted counting benchmark instances.
Cite as

Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Stefan Woltran, and Markus Zisser. Weighted Model Counting on the GPU by Exploiting Small Treewidth. In 26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 112, pp. 28:1-28:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fichte_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2018.28,
  author =	{Fichte, Johannes K. and Hecher, Markus and Woltran, Stefan and Zisser, Markus},
  title =	{{Weighted Model Counting on the GPU by Exploiting Small Treewidth}},
  booktitle =	{26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2018)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-081-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{112},
  editor =	{Azar, Yossi and Bast, Hannah and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2018.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-94915},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2018.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized Algorithms, Weighted Model Counting, General Purpose Computing on Graphics Processing Units, Dynamic Programming, Tree Decompositions, Treewidth}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.17
DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action

Authors: Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Michael Morak, and Stefan Woltran

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 89, 12th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2017)

Abstract
Efficient, exact parameterized algorithms are a vibrant theoretical research area. Recent solving competitions, such as the PACE challenge, show that there is also increasing practical interest in the parameterized algorithms community. An important research question is whether such algorithms can be built to efficiently solve specific problems in practice, that is, to be competitive with established solving systems. In this paper, we consider Answer Set Programming (ASP), a logic-based declarative modeling and problem solving framework. State-of-the-art ASP solvers generally rely on SAT-based algorithms. In addition, DynASP2, an ASP solver that is based on a classical dynamic programming on tree decompositions, has recently been introduced. DynASP2 outperforms modern ASP solvers when the goal is to count the number of solutions of programs that have small treewidth. However, for quickly finding one solutions, DynASP2 proved uncompetitive. In this paper, we present a new algorithm and implementation, called DynASP2.5, that shows competitive behavior compared to state-of-the-art ASP solvers on problems like Steiner tree for low-treewidth graphs, even when the task is to find just one solution. Our implementation is based on a novel approach that we call multi-pass dynamic programming.
Cite as

Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Michael Morak, and Stefan Woltran. DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action. In 12th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 89, pp. 17:1-17:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fichte_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.17,
  author =	{Fichte, Johannes K. and Hecher, Markus and Morak, Michael and Woltran, Stefan},
  title =	{{DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action}},
  booktitle =	{12th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2017)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-051-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{89},
  editor =	{Lokshtanov, Daniel and Nishimura, Naomi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-85739},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized algorithms, Fixed-parameter linear time, Tree decompositions, Multi-pass dynamic programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.247
Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming

Authors: Michael Morak and Stefan Woltran

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 17, Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12) (2012)

Abstract
In this paper we present a novel method for preprocessing complex non-ground rules in answer set programming (ASP). Using a well-known result from the area of conjunctive query evaluation, we apply hypertree decomposition to ASP rules in order to make the structure of rules more explicit to grounders. In particular, the decomposition of rules reduces the number of variables per rule, while on the other hand, additional predicates are required to link the decomposed rules together. As we show in this paper, this technique can reduce the size of the grounding significantly and thus improves the performance of ASP systems in certain cases. Using a prototype implementation and the benchmark suites of the Answer Set Programming Competition 2011, we perform extensive tests of our decomposition approach that clearly show the improvements in grounding time and size.
Cite as

Michael Morak and Stefan Woltran. Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming. In Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 17, pp. 247-258, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{morak_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.247,
  author =	{Morak, Michael and Woltran, Stefan},
  title =	{{Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12)},
  pages =	{247--258},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-43-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{17},
  editor =	{Dovier, Agostino and Santos Costa, V{\'\i}tor},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.247},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-36263},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.247},
  annote =	{Keywords: answer set programming, hypertree decomposition, preprocessing}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 12 Document/PDF
  • 8 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 8 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 2 2018
  • 1 2012

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Hecher, Markus
  • 3 Woltran, Stefan
  • 2 Fichte, Johannes K.
  • 2 Morak, Michael
  • 1 Bannach, Max
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 9 LIPIcs
  • 2 OASIcs
  • 1 DagMan

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • 3 Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Logic programming and answer set programming
  • 2 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 2 Theory of computation → Complexity theory and logic
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Dominating Set
  • 2 Hitting Set
  • 2 treewidth
  • 1 Abstract argumentation
  • 1 Algorithm Engineering
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact