13 Search Results for "Alrabiah, Omar"

Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.43
Gabidulin Codes Achieve List Decoding Capacity with an Order-Optimal Column-To-Row Ratio

Authors: Zeyu Guo, Chaoping Xing, Chen Yuan, and Zihan Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we show that random Gabidulin codes of block length n and rate R achieve the (average-radius) list decoding capacity of radius 1-R-ε in the rank metric with an order-optimal column-to-row ratio of O(ε). This extends the recent work of Guo, Xing, Yuan, and Zhang (FOCS 2024), improving their column-to-row ratio from O(ε/n) to O(ε). For completeness, we also establish a matching lower bound on the column-to-row ratio for capacity-achieving Gabidulin codes in the rank metric. Our proof techniques build on the work of Guo and Zhang (FOCS 2023), who showed that randomly punctured Reed-Solomon codes over fields of quadratic size attain the generalized Singleton bound of Shangguan and Tamo (STOC 2020) in the Hamming metric. The proof of our lower bound follows the method of Alrabiah, Guruswami, and Li (SODA 2024) for codes in the Hamming metric.
Cite as

Zeyu Guo, Chaoping Xing, Chen Yuan, and Zihan Zhang. Gabidulin Codes Achieve List Decoding Capacity with an Order-Optimal Column-To-Row Ratio. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 43:1-43:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{guo_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.43,
  author =	{Guo, Zeyu and Xing, Chaoping and Yuan, Chen and Zhang, Zihan},
  title =	{{Gabidulin Codes Achieve List Decoding Capacity with an Order-Optimal Column-To-Row Ratio}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{43:1--43:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.43},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244095},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.43},
  annote =	{Keywords: coding theory, error-correcting codes, Gabidulin codes, rank-metric codes}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.53
Near-Optimal List-Recovery of Linear Code Families

Authors: Ray Li and Nikhil Shagrithaya

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We prove several results on linear codes achieving list-recovery capacity. We show that random linear codes achieve list-recovery capacity with constant output list size (independent of the alphabet size and length). That is, over alphabets of size at least 𝓁^Ω(1/ε), random linear codes of rate R are (1-R-ε, 𝓁, (𝓁/ε)^O(𝓁/ε))-list-recoverable for all R ∈ (0,1) and 𝓁. Together with a result of Levi, Mosheiff, and Shagrithaya, this implies that randomly punctured Reed-Solomon codes also achieve list-recovery capacity. We also prove that our output list size is near-optimal among all linear codes: all (1-R-ε, 𝓁, L)-list-recoverable linear codes must have L ≥ 𝓁^{Ω(R/ε)}. Our simple upper bound combines the Zyablov-Pinsker argument with recent bounds from Kopparty, Ron-Zewi, Saraf, Wootters, and Tamo on the maximum intersection of a "list-recovery ball" and a low-dimensional subspace with large distance. Our lower bound is inspired by a recent lower bound of Chen and Zhang.
Cite as

Ray Li and Nikhil Shagrithaya. Near-Optimal List-Recovery of Linear Code Families. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 53:1-53:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{li_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.53,
  author =	{Li, Ray and Shagrithaya, Nikhil},
  title =	{{Near-Optimal List-Recovery of Linear Code Families}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{53:1--53:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.53},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244199},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.53},
  annote =	{Keywords: Error-Correcting Codes, Randomness, List-Recovery, Reed-Solomon Codes, Random Linear Codes}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.17
Spectral Refutations of Semirandom k-LIN over Larger Fields

Authors: Nicholas Kocurek and Peter Manohar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We study the problem of strongly refuting semirandom k-LIN(𝔽) instances: systems of k-sparse inhomogeneous linear equations over a finite field 𝔽. For the case of 𝔽 = 𝔽₂, this is the well-studied problem of refuting semirandom instances of k-XOR, where the works of [Venkatesan Guruswami et al., 2022; Jun-Ting Hsieh et al., 2023] establish a tight trade-off between runtime and clause density for refutation: for any choice of a parameter 𝓁, they give an n^{O(𝓁)}-time algorithm to certify that there is no assignment that can satisfy more than 1/2 + ε-fraction of constraints in a semirandom k-XOR instance, provided that the instance has O(n)⋅(n/𝓁)^{k/2 - 1} log n/ε⁴ constraints, and the work of [Pravesh K. Kothari et al., 2017] provides good evidence that this tight up to a polylog(n) factor via lower bounds for the Sum-of-Squares hierarchy. However, for larger fields, the only known results for this problem are established via black-box reductions to the case of 𝔽₂, resulting in a |𝔽|^{3k} gap between the current best upper and lower bounds. In this paper, we give an algorithm for refuting semirandom k-LIN(𝔽) instances with the "correct" dependence on the field size |𝔽|. For any choice of a parameter 𝓁, our algorithm runs in (|𝔽|)^O(𝓁)-time and strongly refutes semirandom k-LIN(𝔽) instances with at least O(n) ⋅ (|𝔽^*| n/𝓁) ^{k/2 - 1} log(n|𝔽^*|)/ε⁴ constraints. We give good evidence that this dependence on the field size |𝔽| is optimal by proving a lower bound for the Sum-of-Squares hierarchy that matches this threshold up to a polylog(n |𝔽^*|) factor. Our results also extend beyond finite fields to the more general case of ℤ_m and arbitrary finite Abelian groups. Our key technical innovation is a generalization of the "𝔽₂ Kikuchi matrices" of [Alexander S. Wein et al., 2019; Venkatesan Guruswami et al., 2022] to larger fields, and finite Abelian groups more generally.
Cite as

Nicholas Kocurek and Peter Manohar. Spectral Refutations of Semirandom k-LIN over Larger Fields. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 17:1-17:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kocurek_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.17,
  author =	{Kocurek, Nicholas and Manohar, Peter},
  title =	{{Spectral Refutations of Semirandom k-LIN over Larger Fields}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243834},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Spectral Algorithms, CSP Refutation, Kikuchi Matrices}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.38
Low-Degree Polynomials Are Good Extractors

Authors: Omar Alrabiah, Jesse Goodman, Jonathan Mosheiff, and João Ribeiro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We prove that random low-degree polynomials (over 𝔽₂) are unbiased, in an extremely general sense. That is, we show that random low-degree polynomials are good randomness extractors for a wide class of distributions. Prior to our work, such results were only known for the small families of (1) uniform sources, (2) affine sources, and (3) local sources. We significantly generalize these results, and prove the following. 1) Low-degree polynomials extract from small families. We show that a random low-degree polynomial is a good low-error extractor for any small family of sources. In particular, we improve the positive result of Alrabiah, Chattopadhyay, Goodman, Li, and Ribeiro (ICALP 2022) for local sources, and give new results for polynomial and variety sources via a single unified approach. 2) Low-degree polynomials extract from sumset sources. We show that a random low-degree polynomial is a good extractor for sumset sources, which are the most general large family of sources (capturing independent sources, interleaved sources, small-space sources, and more). Formally, for any even d, we show that a random degree d polynomial is an ε-error extractor for n-bit sumset sources with min-entropy k = O(d(n/ε²)^{2/d}). This is nearly tight in the polynomial error regime. Our results on sumset extractors imply new complexity separations for linear ROBPs, and the tools that go into its proof may be of independent interest. The two main tools we use are a new structural result on sumset-punctured Reed-Muller codes, paired with a novel type of reduction between extractors. Using the new structural result, we obtain new limits on the power of sumset extractors, strengthening and generalizing the impossibility results of Chattopadhyay, Goodman, and Gurumukhani (ITCS 2024).
Cite as

Omar Alrabiah, Jesse Goodman, Jonathan Mosheiff, and João Ribeiro. Low-Degree Polynomials Are Good Extractors. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 38:1-38:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alrabiah_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.38,
  author =	{Alrabiah, Omar and Goodman, Jesse and Mosheiff, Jonathan and Ribeiro, Jo\~{a}o},
  title =	{{Low-Degree Polynomials Are Good Extractors}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244048},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: randomness extractors, low-degree polynomials, local sources, polynomial sources, variety sources, sumset sources, sumset extractors, Reed-Muller codes, lower bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.32
A Lower Bound for k-DNF Resolution on Random CNF Formulas via Expansion

Authors: Anastasia Sofronova and Dmitry Sokolov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Random Δ-CNF formulas are one of the few candidates that are expected to be hard for proof systems and SAT algotirhms. Assume we sample m clauses over n variables. Here, the main complexity parameter is clause density, χ := m/n. For a fixed Δ, there exists a satisfiability threshold c_Δ such that for χ > c_Δ a formula is unsatisfiable with high probability. and for χ < c_Δ it is satisfiable with high probability. Near satisfiability threshold, there are various lower bounds for algorithms and proof systems [Eli Ben-Sasson, 2001; Eli Ben-Sasson and Russell Impagliazzo, 1999; Michael Alekhnovich and Alexander A. Razborov, 2003; Dima Grigoriev, 2001; Grant Schoenebeck, 2008; Pavel Hrubes and Pavel Pudlák, 2017; Noah Fleming et al., 2017; Dmitry Sokolov, 2024], and for high-density regimes, there exist upper bounds [Uriel Feige et al., 2006; Sebastian Müller and Iddo Tzameret, 2014; Jackson Abascal et al., 2021; Venkatesan Guruswami et al., 2022]. One of the frontiers in the direction of proving lower bounds on these formulas is the k-DNF Resolution proof system (aka Res(k)). There are several known results for k = 𝒪(√{log n}/{log log n}}) [Nathan Segerlind et al., 2004; Michael Alekhnovich, 2011], that are applicable only for density regime near the threshold. In this paper, we show the first Res(k) lower bound that is applicable in higher-density regimes. Our results work for slightly larger k = 𝒪(√{log n}).
Cite as

Anastasia Sofronova and Dmitry Sokolov. A Lower Bound for k-DNF Resolution on Random CNF Formulas via Expansion. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 32:1-32:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sofronova_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.32,
  author =	{Sofronova, Anastasia and Sokolov, Dmitry},
  title =	{{A Lower Bound for k-DNF Resolution on Random CNF Formulas via Expansion}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237269},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof complexity, random CNFs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1
List Decoding Quotient Reed-Muller Codes

Authors: Omri Gotlib, Tali Kaufman, and Shachar Lovett

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
Reed-Muller codes consist of evaluations of n-variate polynomials over a finite field 𝔽 with degree at most d. Much like every linear code, Reed-Muller codes can be characterized by constraints, where a codeword is valid if and only if it satisfies all degree-d constraints. For a subset X̃ ⊆ 𝔽ⁿ, we introduce the notion of X̃-quotient Reed-Muller code. A function F:X̃ → 𝔽 is a valid codeword in the quotient code if it satisfies all the constraints of degree-d polynomials lying in X̃. This gives rise to a novel phenomenon: a quotient codeword may have many extensions to original codewords. This weakens the connection between original codewords and quotient codewords which introduces a richer range of behaviors along with substantial new challenges. Our goal is to answer the following question: what properties of X̃ will imply that the quotient code inherits its distance and list-decoding radius from the original code? We address this question using techniques developed by Bhowmick and Lovett [Abhishek Bhowmick and Shachar Lovett, 2014], identifying key properties of 𝔽ⁿ used in their proof and extending them to general subsets X̃ ⊆ 𝔽ⁿ. By introducing a new tool, we overcome the novel challenge in analyzing the quotient code that arises from the weak connection between original and quotient codewords. This enables us to apply known results from additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry [David Kazhdan and Tamar Ziegler, 2018; David Kazhdan and Tamar Ziegler, 2019; Amichai Lampert and Tamar Ziegler, 2021] to show that when X̃ is a high rank variety, X̃-quotient Reed-Muller codes inherit the distance and list-decoding parameters from the original Reed-Muller codes.
Cite as

Omri Gotlib, Tali Kaufman, and Shachar Lovett. List Decoding Quotient Reed-Muller Codes. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 1:1-1:44, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gotlib_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1,
  author =	{Gotlib, Omri and Kaufman, Tali and Lovett, Shachar},
  title =	{{List Decoding Quotient Reed-Muller Codes}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:44},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236957},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reed-Muller Codes, Quotient Code, Quotient Reed-Muller Code, List Decoding, High Rank Variety, High-Order Fourier Analysis, Error-Correcting Codes}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60
Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets

Authors: Roni Con, Zeyu Guo, Ray Li, and Zihan Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we prove that with high probability, random Reed-Solomon codes approach the half-Singleton bound - the optimal rate versus error tradeoff for linear insdel codes - with linear-sized alphabets. More precisely, we prove that, for any ε > 0 and positive integers n and k, with high probability, random Reed-Solomon codes of length n and dimension k can correct (1-ε)n-2k+1 adversarial insdel errors over alphabets of size n+2^{poly(1/ε)}k. This significantly improves upon the alphabet size demonstrated in the work of Con, Shpilka, and Tamo (IEEE TIT, 2023), who showed the existence of Reed-Solomon codes with exponential alphabet size Õ(binom(n,2k-1)²) precisely achieving the half-Singleton bound. Our methods are inspired by recent works on list-decoding Reed-Solomon codes. Brakensiek-Gopi-Makam (STOC 2023) showed that random Reed-Solomon codes are list-decodable up to capacity with exponential-sized alphabets, and Guo-Zhang (FOCS 2023) and Alrabiah-Guruswami-Li (STOC 2024) improved the alphabet-size to linear. We achieve a similar alphabet-size reduction by similarly establishing strong bounds on the probability that certain random rectangular matrices are full rank. To accomplish this in our insdel context, our proof combines the random matrix techniques from list-decoding with structural properties of Longest Common Subsequences.
Cite as

Roni Con, Zeyu Guo, Ray Li, and Zihan Zhang. Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 60:1-60:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{con_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60,
  author =	{Con, Roni and Guo, Zeyu and Li, Ray and Zhang, Zihan},
  title =	{{Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{60:1--60:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234372},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.60},
  annote =	{Keywords: coding theory, error-correcting codes, Reed-Solomon codes, insdel, insertion-deletion errors, half-Singleton bound}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.93
Polynomials, Divided Differences, and Codes

Authors: S. Venkitesh

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
Multiplicity codes (Kopparty et al., J. ACM 2014) are multivariate polynomial codes where the codewords are described by evaluations of polynomials (with a degree bound) and their derivatives up to some order (the multiplicity parameter), on a suitably chosen affine set of points. While efficient decoding algorithms were known in some special cases of point sets, by a reduction to univariate multiplicity codes, a general algorithm for list decoding up to the distance of the code when the point set is an arbitrary finite grid, was obtained only recently (Bhandari et al., IEEE TIT 2023). This required the characteristic of the field to be zero or larger than the degree bound, which is somewhat necessary since list decoding up to distance with small output list size is not possible when the characteristic is significantly smaller than the degree. In this work, we present an alternative construction based on divided differences of polynomials, that conceptually resembles the classical multiplicity codes but has good list decodability "insensitive to the field characteristic". We obtain a simple algorithm that list decodes this code up to distance for arbitrary finite grids over all finite fields. Our construction can also be interpreted as a folded Reed-Muller code, which may be of independent interest.
Cite as

S. Venkitesh. Polynomials, Divided Differences, and Codes. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 93:1-93:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{venkitesh:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.93,
  author =	{Venkitesh, S.},
  title =	{{Polynomials, Divided Differences, and Codes}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{93:1--93:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.93},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227216},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.93},
  annote =	{Keywords: Error-correcting code, polynomial code, Reed-Solomon code, Reed-Muller code, folded Reed-Solomon code, folded Reed-Muller code, multiplicity code, divided difference, q-derivative, polynomial method, list decoding, list decoding capacity, linear algebraic list decoding}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.60
List Decoding Bounds for Binary Codes with Noiseless Feedback

Authors: Meghal Gupta and Rachel Yun Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
In an error-correcting code, a sender encodes a message x ∈ {0, 1}^k such that it is still decodable by a receiver on the other end of a noisy channel. In the setting of error-correcting codes with feedback, after sending each bit, the sender learns what was received at the other end and can tailor future messages accordingly. While the unique decoding radius of feedback codes has long been known to be 1/3, the list decoding capabilities of feedback codes is not well understood. In this paper, we provide the first nontrivial bounds on the list decoding radius of feedback codes for lists of size 𝓁. For 𝓁 = 2, we fully determine the 2-list decoding radius to be 3/7. For larger values of 𝓁, we show an upper bound of 1/2 - 1/{2^(𝓁+2) - 2}, and show that the same techniques for the 𝓁 = 2 case cannot match this upper bound in general.
Cite as

Meghal Gupta and Rachel Yun Zhang. List Decoding Bounds for Binary Codes with Noiseless Feedback. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 60:1-60:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.60,
  author =	{Gupta, Meghal and Zhang, Rachel Yun},
  title =	{{List Decoding Bounds for Binary Codes with Noiseless Feedback}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{60:1--60:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.60},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226880},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.60},
  annote =	{Keywords: error-correcting codes, feedback, list decoding}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.2
Improved Lower Bounds for 3-Query Matching Vector Codes

Authors: Divesh Aggarwal, Pranjal Dutta, Zeyong Li, Maciej Obremski, and Sidhant Saraogi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
A Matching Vector (MV) family modulo a positive integer m ≥ 2 is a pair of ordered lists U = (u_1, ⋯, u_K) and V = (v_1, ⋯, v_K) where u_i, v_j ∈ ℤ_m^n with the following property: for any i ∈ [K], the inner product ⟨u_i, v_i⟩ = 0 mod m, and for any i ≠ j, ⟨u_i, v_j⟩ ≠ 0 mod m. An MV family is called r-restricted if inner products ⟨u_i, v_j⟩, for all i,j, take at most r different values. The r-restricted MV families are extremely important since the only known construction of constant-query subexponential locally decodable codes (LDCs) are based on them. Such LDCs constructed via matching vector families are called matching vector codes. Let MV(m,n) (respectively MV(m, n, r)) denote the largest K such that there exists an MV family (respectively r-restricted MV family) of size K in ℤ_m^n. Such a MV family can be transformed in a black-box manner to a good r-query locally decodable code taking messages of length K to codewords of length N = m^n. For small prime m, an almost tight bound MV(m,n) ≤ O(m^{n/2}) was first shown by Dvir, Gopalan, Yekhanin (FOCS'10, SICOMP'11), while for general m, the same paper established an upper bound of O(m^{n-1+o_m(1)}), with o_m(1) denoting a function that goes to zero when m grows. For any arbitrary constant r ≥ 3 and composite m, the best upper bound till date on MV(m,n,r) is O(m^{n/2}), is due to Bhowmick, Dvir and Lovett (STOC'13, SICOMP'14).In a breakthrough work, Alrabiah, Guruswami, Kothari and Manohar (STOC'23) implicitly improve this bound for 3-restricted families to MV(m, n, 3) ≤ O(m^{n/3}). In this work, we present an upper bound for r = 3 where MV(m,n,3) ≤ m^{n/6 +O(log n)}, and as a result, any 3-query matching vector code must have codeword length of N ≥ K^{6-o(1)}.
Cite as

Divesh Aggarwal, Pranjal Dutta, Zeyong Li, Maciej Obremski, and Sidhant Saraogi. Improved Lower Bounds for 3-Query Matching Vector Codes. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 2:1-2:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aggarwal_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.2,
  author =	{Aggarwal, Divesh and Dutta, Pranjal and Li, Zeyong and Obremski, Maciej and Saraogi, Sidhant},
  title =	{{Improved Lower Bounds for 3-Query Matching Vector Codes}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226308},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Locally Decodable Codes, Matching Vector Families}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.41
Hilbert Functions and Low-Degree Randomness Extractors

Authors: Alexander Golovnev, Zeyu Guo, Pooya Hatami, Satyajeet Nagargoje, and Chao Yan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 317, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2024)

Abstract
For S ⊆ 𝔽ⁿ, consider the linear space of restrictions of degree-d polynomials to S. The Hilbert function of S, denoted h_S(d,𝔽), is the dimension of this space. We obtain a tight lower bound on the smallest value of the Hilbert function of subsets S of arbitrary finite grids in 𝔽ⁿ with a fixed size |S|. We achieve this by proving that this value coincides with a combinatorial quantity, namely the smallest number of low Hamming weight points in a down-closed set of size |S|. Understanding the smallest values of Hilbert functions is closely related to the study of degree-d closure of sets, a notion introduced by Nie and Wang (Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 2015). We use bounds on the Hilbert function to obtain a tight bound on the size of degree-d closures of subsets of 𝔽_qⁿ, which answers a question posed by Doron, Ta-Shma, and Tell (Computational Complexity, 2022). We use the bounds on the Hilbert function and degree-d closure of sets to prove that a random low-degree polynomial is an extractor for samplable randomness sources. Most notably, we prove the existence of low-degree extractors and dispersers for sources generated by constant-degree polynomials and polynomial-size circuits. Until recently, even the existence of arbitrary deterministic extractors for such sources was not known.
Cite as

Alexander Golovnev, Zeyu Guo, Pooya Hatami, Satyajeet Nagargoje, and Chao Yan. Hilbert Functions and Low-Degree Randomness Extractors. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 317, pp. 41:1-41:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{golovnev_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.41,
  author =	{Golovnev, Alexander and Guo, Zeyu and Hatami, Pooya and Nagargoje, Satyajeet and Yan, Chao},
  title =	{{Hilbert Functions and Low-Degree Randomness Extractors}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2024)},
  pages =	{41:1--41:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-348-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{317},
  editor =	{Kumar, Amit and Ron-Zewi, Noga},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.41},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-210345},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.41},
  annote =	{Keywords: Extractors, Dispersers, Circuits, Hilbert Function, Randomness, Low Degree Polynomials}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2022.10
Low-Degree Polynomials Extract From Local Sources

Authors: Omar Alrabiah, Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jesse Goodman, Xin Li, and João Ribeiro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 229, 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022)

Abstract
We continue a line of work on extracting random bits from weak sources that are generated by simple processes. We focus on the model of locally samplable sources, where each bit in the source depends on a small number of (hidden) uniformly random input bits. Also known as local sources, this model was introduced by De and Watson (TOCT 2012) and Viola (SICOMP 2014), and is closely related to sources generated by AC⁰ circuits and bounded-width branching programs. In particular, extractors for local sources also work for sources generated by these classical computational models. Despite being introduced a decade ago, little progress has been made on improving the entropy requirement for extracting from local sources. The current best explicit extractors require entropy n^{1/2}, and follow via a reduction to affine extractors. To start, we prove a barrier showing that one cannot hope to improve this entropy requirement via a black-box reduction of this form. In particular, new techniques are needed. In our main result, we seek to answer whether low-degree polynomials (over 𝔽₂) hold potential for breaking this barrier. We answer this question in the positive, and fully characterize the power of low-degree polynomials as extractors for local sources. More precisely, we show that a random degree r polynomial is a low-error extractor for n-bit local sources with min-entropy Ω(r(nlog n)^{1/r}), and we show that this is tight. Our result leverages several new ingredients, which may be of independent interest. Our existential result relies on a new reduction from local sources to a more structured family, known as local non-oblivious bit-fixing sources. To show its tightness, we prove a "local version" of a structural result by Cohen and Tal (RANDOM 2015), which relies on a new "low-weight" Chevalley-Warning theorem.
Cite as

Omar Alrabiah, Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jesse Goodman, Xin Li, and João Ribeiro. Low-Degree Polynomials Extract From Local Sources. In 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 229, pp. 10:1-10:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alrabiah_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2022.10,
  author =	{Alrabiah, Omar and Chattopadhyay, Eshan and Goodman, Jesse and Li, Xin and Ribeiro, Jo\~{a}o},
  title =	{{Low-Degree Polynomials Extract From Local Sources}},
  booktitle =	{49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-235-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{229},
  editor =	{Boja\'{n}czyk, Miko{\l}aj and Merelli, Emanuela and Woodruff, David P.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2022.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-163519},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2022.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Randomness extractors, local sources, samplable sources, AC⁰ circuits, branching programs, low-degree polynomials, Chevalley-Warning}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.57
Visible Rank and Codes with Locality

Authors: Omar Alrabiah and Venkatesan Guruswami

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 207, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021)

Abstract
We propose a framework to study the effect of local recovery requirements of codeword symbols on the dimension of linear codes, based on a combinatorial proxy that we call visible rank. The locality constraints of a linear code are stipulated by a matrix H of ⋆’s and 0’s (which we call a "stencil"), whose rows correspond to the local parity checks (with the ⋆’s indicating the support of the check). The visible rank of H is the largest r for which there is a r × r submatrix in H with a unique generalized diagonal of ⋆’s. The visible rank yields a field-independent combinatorial lower bound on the rank of H and thus the co-dimension of the code. We point out connections of the visible rank to other notions in the literature such as unique restricted graph matchings, matroids, spanoids, and min-rank. In particular, we prove a rank-nullity type theorem relating visible rank to the rank of an associated construct called symmetric spanoid, which was introduced by Dvir, Gopi, Gu, and Wigderson [Zeev Dvir et al., 2020]. Using this connection and a construction of appropriate stencils, we answer a question posed in [Zeev Dvir et al., 2020] and demonstrate that symmetric spanoid rank cannot improve the currently best known Õ(n^{(q-2)/(q-1)}) upper bound on the dimension of q-query locally correctable codes (LCCs) of length n. This also pins down the efficacy of visible rank as a proxy for the dimension of LCCs. We also study the t-Disjoint Repair Group Property (t-DRGP) of codes where each codeword symbol must belong to t disjoint check equations. It is known that linear codes with 2-DRGP must have co-dimension Ω(√n) (which is matched by a simple product code construction). We show that there are stencils corresponding to 2-DRGP with visible rank as small as O(log n). However, we show the second tensor of any 2-DRGP stencil has visible rank Ω(n), thus recovering the Ω(√n) lower bound for 2-DRGP. For q-LCC, however, the k'th tensor power for k ⩽ n^{o(1)} is unable to improve the Õ(n^{(q-2)/(q-1)}) upper bound on the dimension of q-LCCs by a polynomial factor.Inspired by this and as a notion of intrinsic interest, we define the notion of visible capacity of a stencil as the limiting visible rank of high tensor powers, analogous to Shannon capacity, and pose the question whether there can be large gaps between visible capacity and algebraic rank.
Cite as

Omar Alrabiah and Venkatesan Guruswami. Visible Rank and Codes with Locality. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 207, pp. 57:1-57:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alrabiah_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.57,
  author =	{Alrabiah, Omar and Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  title =	{{Visible Rank and Codes with Locality}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021)},
  pages =	{57:1--57:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-207-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{207},
  editor =	{Wootters, Mary and Sanit\`{a}, Laura},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.57},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-147502},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.57},
  annote =	{Keywords: Visible Rank, Stencils, Locality, DRGP Codes, Locally Correctable Codes}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 13 Document/PDF
  • 9 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 10 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2021

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Alrabiah, Omar
  • 3 Guo, Zeyu
  • 2 Goodman, Jesse
  • 2 Li, Ray
  • 2 Ribeiro, João
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 13 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 6 Mathematics of computing → Coding theory
  • 5 Theory of computation → Pseudorandomness and derandomization
  • 4 Theory of computation → Error-correcting codes
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorics
  • 1 Theory of computation → Approximation algorithms analysis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 error-correcting codes
  • 2 Error-Correcting Codes
  • 2 Randomness
  • 2 coding theory
  • 2 list decoding
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact