12 Search Results for "Boyar, Joan"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.86
The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Order

Authors: Helia Karisani, Mohammadreza Daneshvaramoli, Hedyeh Beyhaghi, Mohammad Hajiesmaili, and Cameron Musco

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We study a learning-augmented variant of the secretary problem, recently introduced by Fujii and Yoshida (2023). In this variant, the decision-maker has access to machine-learned predictions of candidate values in advance. The key challenge is to balance consistency and robustness: when the predictions are accurate, the algorithm should hire a near-best secretary; however, if they are inaccurate, the algorithm should still achieve a bounded competitive ratio. We consider both the standard Random Order Secretary Problem (ROSP), where candidates arrive in a uniform random order, and a more natural model in the learning-augmented setting, where the decision-maker can choose the arrival order based on the predicted candidate values. This model, which we call the Chosen Order Secretary Problem (COSP), can capture scenarios such as an interview schedule that is set by the decision-maker. We propose a novel algorithm that applies to both ROSP and COSP. Building on the approach of Fujii and Yoshida, our method switches from fully trusting predictions to a threshold-based rule when a large deviation of a prediction is observed. Importantly, unlike the algorithm of Fujii and Yoshida, our algorithm uses randomization as part of its decision logic. We show that if ε ∈ [0,1] denotes the maximum multiplicative prediction error, then for ROSP our algorithm achieves competitive ratio max {0.221, (1-ε)/(1+ε)}, improving on a previous bound of max {0.215, (1-ε)/(1+ε)} due to Fujii and Yoshida [Fujii and Yoshida, 2023]. For COSP, our algorithm achieves max {0.262, (1-ε)/(1+ε)}. This surpasses a 0.25 upper bound on the worst-case competitive ratio that applies to the approach of Fujii and Yoshida, and gets closer to the classical secretary benchmark of 1/e ≈ 0.368, which is an upper bound for any algorithm. Our result for COSP highlights the benefit of integrating predictions with arrival-order control in online decision-making.
Cite as

Helia Karisani, Mohammadreza Daneshvaramoli, Hedyeh Beyhaghi, Mohammad Hajiesmaili, and Cameron Musco. The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Order. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 86:1-86:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{karisani_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.86,
  author =	{Karisani, Helia and Daneshvaramoli, Mohammadreza and Beyhaghi, Hedyeh and Hajiesmaili, Mohammad and Musco, Cameron},
  title =	{{The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Order}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{86:1--86:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.86},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253734},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.86},
  annote =	{Keywords: Secretary problem, learning-augmented algorithms, online algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.34
Deterministic Local Problems in Radio Networks: On the Impact of Local Domination and a Bit of Advice

Authors: Pawel Garncarek, Tomasz Jurdzinski, Dariusz R. Kowalski, Shay Kutten, and Miguel A. Mosteiro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)

Abstract
Radio Networks (RN) is one of the fundamental models for network communication where nodes can broadcast messages locally but their simultaneous transmissions can interfere with each other at their shared neighbors. This work focuses on performing the very fundamental primitive of Local Broadcast, in spite of the interferences. We investigate to what extent local knowledge, called advice, relating to the 2-local domination number γ₂ may speed up Local Broadcast. Specifically for each node and some dominating set, knowledge about some neighboring dominating node and the local number among the neighbors of that dominating node. We show that such advice is sufficient to build an efficient oblivious transmission schedule. Along those lines, we present three algorithms trading the level of adaptiveness (from oblivious to adaptive) for bits of advice per node (from O(log (Δγ₂)) to 1). All our algorithms complete Local Broadcast in Õ(Δγ₂²) rounds, where Δ is the maximum degree of the network. On the side of lower bounds, we show that, for each quasi-adaptive deterministic Local Broadcast algorithm, there is some RN that requires Ω(min{(min{Δ,γ₂}/log n)²,n}) communication rounds, where n is the number of network nodes. In quasi-adaptive protocols nodes may stop executing once its computational task is completed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first (nearly) quadratic Local Broadcast (same message for all neighbors) lower bound in the RN model. Our lower bound is stronger than previous works in multiple ways: i) it is nearly quadratically better than the best known general lower bound for this class of algorithms, ii) it applies to a wider class of algorithms than previous work for fully oblivious, iii) it achieves similar time lower bound than previous work proved for a much more demanding Local Broadcast where each node sends a possibly different message to each neighbor, and iv) it takes into account the local domination parameter γ₂.
Cite as

Pawel Garncarek, Tomasz Jurdzinski, Dariusz R. Kowalski, Shay Kutten, and Miguel A. Mosteiro. Deterministic Local Problems in Radio Networks: On the Impact of Local Domination and a Bit of Advice. In 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 359, pp. 34:1-34:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{garncarek_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.34,
  author =	{Garncarek, Pawel and Jurdzinski, Tomasz and Kowalski, Dariusz R. and Kutten, Shay and Mosteiro, Miguel A.},
  title =	{{Deterministic Local Problems in Radio Networks: On the Impact of Local Domination and a Bit of Advice}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-408-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{359},
  editor =	{Chen, Ho-Lin and Hon, Wing-Kai and Tsai, Meng-Tsung},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249426},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Radio Networks, Local Broadcast, Distributed Deterministic Algorithms, Lower Bounds, Graph algorithms, Advice, Labeling Schemes, Local Domination}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.55
Brief Announcement: Concurrent Double-Ended Priority Queues

Authors: Panagiota Fatourou, Eric Ruppert, and Ioannis Xiradakis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
This work provides the first concurrent implementation of a double-ended priority queue (DEPQ). We describe a general way to add an ExtractMax operation to any concurrent priority queue that already supports Insert and ExtractMin.
Cite as

Panagiota Fatourou, Eric Ruppert, and Ioannis Xiradakis. Brief Announcement: Concurrent Double-Ended Priority Queues. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 55:1-55:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fatourou_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.55,
  author =	{Fatourou, Panagiota and Ruppert, Eric and Xiradakis, Ioannis},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Concurrent Double-Ended Priority Queues}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{55:1--55:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.55},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248719},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.55},
  annote =	{Keywords: shared-memory, data structure, double-ended, priority queue, priority deque, heap, skip list, combining}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.12
Distributed Computation with Local Advice

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Krzysztof Nowicki, Dennis Olivetti, Eva Rotenberg, and Jukka Suomela

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Algorithms with advice have received ample attention in the distributed and online settings, and they have recently proven useful also in dynamic settings. In this work we study local computation with advice: the goal is to solve a graph problem Π with a distributed algorithm in T(Δ) communication rounds, for some function T that only depends on the maximum degree Δ of the graph, and the key question is how many bits of advice per node are needed. Some of our results regard Locally Checkable Labeling problems (LCLs), which is an important family of problems that includes various coloring and orientation problems on finite-degree graphs. These are constraint-satisfaction graph problems that can be defined with a finite set of valid input/output-labeled neighborhoods. Our main results are: 1) Any locally checkable labeling problem can be solved with only 1 bit of advice per node in graphs with sub-exponential growth (the number of nodes within radius r is sub-exponential in r; for example, grids are such graphs). Moreover, we can make the set of nodes that carry advice bits arbitrarily sparse. As a corollary, any locally checkable labeling problem admits a locally checkable proof with 1 bit per node in graphs with sub-exponential growth. 2) The assumption of sub-exponential growth is complemented by a conditional lower bound: assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, there are locally checkable labeling problems that cannot be solved in general with any constant number of bits per node. 3) In any graph we can find an almost-balanced orientation (indegrees and outdegrees differ by at most one) with 1 bit of advice per node, and again we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. As a corollary, we can also compress an arbitrary subset of edges so that a node of degree d stores only d/2 + 2 bits, and we can decompress it locally, in T(Δ) rounds. 4) In any graph of maximum degree Δ, we can find a Δ-coloring (if it exists) with 1 bit of advice per node, and again, we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. 5) In any 3-colorable graph, we can find a 3-coloring with 1 bit of advice per node. As a corollary, in bounded-degree graphs there is a locally checkable proof that certifies 3-colorability with 1 bit of advice per node, while prior work shows that this is not possible with a proof labeling scheme (PLS), which is a more restricted setting where the verifier can only see up to distance 1. Our work shows that for many problems the key threshold is not whether we can achieve 1 bit of advice per node, but whether we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. To formalize this idea, we develop a general framework of composable schemas that enables us to build algorithms for local computation with advice in a modular fashion: once we have (1) a schema for solving Π₁ and (2) a schema for solving Π₂ assuming an oracle for Π₁, we can also compose them and obtain (3) a schema that solves Π₂ without the oracle. It turns out that many natural problems admit composable schemas, all of them can be solved with only 1 bit of advice, and we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse.
Cite as

Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Krzysztof Nowicki, Dennis Olivetti, Eva Rotenberg, and Jukka Suomela. Distributed Computation with Local Advice. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 12:1-12:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{balliu_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.12,
  author =	{Balliu, Alkida and Brandt, Sebastian and Kuhn, Fabian and Nowicki, Krzysztof and Olivetti, Dennis and Rotenberg, Eva and Suomela, Jukka},
  title =	{{Distributed Computation with Local Advice}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248295},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed graph algorithms, LOCAL model, computation with advice, locally checkable labeling problems, proof labeling schemes, locally checkable proofs, graph coloring, exponential-time hypothesis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.76
A 3.3904-Competitive Online Algorithm for List Update with Uniform Costs

Authors: Mateusz Basiak, Marcin Bienkowski, Martin Böhm, Marek Chrobak, Łukasz Jeż, Jiří Sgall, and Agnieszka Tatarczuk

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
We consider the List Update problem where the cost of each swap is assumed to be 1. This is in contrast to the "standard" model, in which an algorithm is allowed to swap the requested item with previous items for free. We construct an online algorithm Full-Or-Partial-Move (FPM), whose competitive ratio is at most 3.3904, improving over the previous best known bound of 4.
Cite as

Mateusz Basiak, Marcin Bienkowski, Martin Böhm, Marek Chrobak, Łukasz Jeż, Jiří Sgall, and Agnieszka Tatarczuk. A 3.3904-Competitive Online Algorithm for List Update with Uniform Costs. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 76:1-76:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{basiak_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.76,
  author =	{Basiak, Mateusz and Bienkowski, Marcin and B\"{o}hm, Martin and Chrobak, Marek and Je\.{z}, {\L}ukasz and Sgall, Ji\v{r}{\'\i} and Tatarczuk, Agnieszka},
  title =	{{A 3.3904-Competitive Online Algorithm for List Update with Uniform Costs}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{76:1--76:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.76},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245442},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.76},
  annote =	{Keywords: List update, work functions, amortized analysis, online algorithms, competitive analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.12
Online Knapsack Problems with Estimates

Authors: Jakub Balabán, Matthias Gehnen, Henri Lotze, Finn Seesemann, and Moritz Stocker

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 345, 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)

Abstract
Imagine you are a computer scientist who enjoys attending conferences or workshops within the year. Sadly, your travel budget is limited, so you must select a subset of events you can travel to. When you are aware of all possible events and their costs at the beginning of the year, you can select the subset of the possible events that maximizes your happiness and is within your budget. On the other hand, if you are blind about the options, you will likely have a hard time when trying to decide if you want to register somewhere or not, and will likely regret decisions you made in the future. These scenarios can be modeled by knapsack variants, either by an offline or an online problem. However, both scenarios are somewhat unrealistic: Usually, you will not know the exact costs of each workshop at the beginning of the year. The online version, however, is too pessimistic, as you might already know which options there are and how much they cost roughly. At some point, you have to decide whether to register for some workshop, but then you are aware of the conference fee and the flight and hotel prices. We model this problem within the setting of online knapsack problems with estimates: in the beginning, you receive a list of potential items with their estimated size as well as the accuracy of the estimates. Then, the items are revealed one by one in an online fashion with their actual size, and you need to decide whether to take one or not. In this article, we show a best-possible algorithm for each estimate accuracy δ (i.e., when each actual item size can deviate by ± δ from the announced size) for both the simple knapsack (also known as subset sum problem) and the simple knapsack with removability.
Cite as

Jakub Balabán, Matthias Gehnen, Henri Lotze, Finn Seesemann, and Moritz Stocker. Online Knapsack Problems with Estimates. In 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 345, pp. 12:1-12:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{balaban_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.12,
  author =	{Balab\'{a}n, Jakub and Gehnen, Matthias and Lotze, Henri and Seesemann, Finn and Stocker, Moritz},
  title =	{{Online Knapsack Problems with Estimates}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-388-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{345},
  editor =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Mazowiecki, Filip and Skrzypczak, Micha{\l}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-241190},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knapsack, Online Knapsack, Removability, Estimate, Prediction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2024.16
On the Online Weighted Non-Crossing Matching Problem

Authors: Joan Boyar, Shahin Kamali, Kim S. Larsen, Ali Mohammad Lavasani, Yaqiao Li, and Denis Pankratov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 294, 19th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2024)

Abstract
We introduce and study the weighted version of an online matching problem in the Euclidean plane with non-crossing constraints: 2n points with non-negative weights arrive online, and an algorithm can match an arriving point to one of the unmatched previously arrived points. In the vanilla model, the decision on how to match (if at all) a newly arriving point is irrevocable. The goal is to maximize the total weight of matched points under the constraint that straight-line segments corresponding to the edges of the matching do not intersect. The unweighted version of the problem was introduced in the offline setting by Atallah in 1985, and this problem became a subject of study in the online setting with and without advice in several recent papers. We observe that deterministic online algorithms cannot guarantee a non-trivial competitive ratio for the weighted problem. We study various regimes of the problem which permit non-trivial online algorithms. In particular, when weights are restricted to the interval [1, U] we give a deterministic algorithm achieving competitive ratio Ω(2^{-2√{log U}}). We also prove that deterministic online algorithms cannot achieve competitive ratio better than O (2^{-√{log U}}). Interestingly, we establish that randomization alone suffices to achieve competitive ratio 1/3 even when there are no restrictions on the weights. Additionally, if one allows an online algorithm to revoke acceptances, then one can achieve a competitive ratio ≈ 0.2862 deterministically for arbitrary weights. We also establish a lower bound on the competitive ratio of randomized algorithms in the unweighted setting, and improve the best-known bound on advice complexity to achieve a perfect matching.
Cite as

Joan Boyar, Shahin Kamali, Kim S. Larsen, Ali Mohammad Lavasani, Yaqiao Li, and Denis Pankratov. On the Online Weighted Non-Crossing Matching Problem. In 19th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 294, pp. 16:1-16:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boyar_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2024.16,
  author =	{Boyar, Joan and Kamali, Shahin and Larsen, Kim S. and Lavasani, Ali Mohammad and Li, Yaqiao and Pankratov, Denis},
  title =	{{On the Online Weighted Non-Crossing Matching Problem}},
  booktitle =	{19th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2024)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-318-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{294},
  editor =	{Bodlaender, Hans L.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2024.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-200567},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2024.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Online algorithms, weighted matching problem, Euclidean plane, non-crossing constraints, competitive analysis, randomized online algorithms, online algorithms with advice, online algorithms with revoking}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.2
Online Algorithms with Predictions (Invited Talk)

Authors: Joan Boyar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 272, 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)

Abstract
We give an introduction to online algorithms with predictions, from an algorithms researcher’s perspective, concentrating on minimization problems.
Cite as

Joan Boyar. Online Algorithms with Predictions (Invited Talk). In 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 272, pp. 2:1-2:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boyar:LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.2,
  author =	{Boyar, Joan},
  title =	{{Online Algorithms with Predictions}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-292-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{272},
  editor =	{Leroux, J\'{e}r\^{o}me and Lombardy, Sylvain and Peleg, David},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-185368},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Online algorithms with predictions, online algorithms with advice, random order analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2022.20
Online Unit Profit Knapsack with Untrusted Predictions

Authors: Joan Boyar, Lene M. Favrholdt, and Kim S. Larsen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 227, 18th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2022)

Abstract
A variant of the online knapsack problem is considered in the settings of trusted and untrusted predictions. In Unit Profit Knapsack, the items have unit profit, and it is easy to find an optimal solution offline: Pack as many of the smallest items as possible into the knapsack. For Online Unit Profit Knapsack, the competitive ratio is unbounded. In contrast, previous work on online algorithms with untrusted predictions generally studied problems where an online algorithm with a constant competitive ratio is known. The prediction, possibly obtained from a machine learning source, that our algorithm uses is the average size of those smallest items that fit in the knapsack. For the prediction error in this hard online problem, we use the ratio r = a/â where a is the actual value for this average size and â is the prediction. The algorithm presented achieves a competitive ratio of 1/(2r) for r ≥ 1 and r/2 for r ≤ 1. Using an adversary technique, we show that this is optimal in some sense, giving a trade-off in the competitive ratio attainable for different values of r. Note that the result for accurate advice, r = 1, is only 1/2, but we show that no deterministic algorithm knowing the value a can achieve a competitive ratio better than (e-1)/e ≈ 0.6321 and present an algorithm with a matching upper bound. We also show that this latter algorithm attains a competitive ratio of r (e-1)/e for r ≤ 1 and (e-r)/e for 1 ≤ r < e, and no deterministic algorithm can be better for both r < 1 and 1 < r < e.
Cite as

Joan Boyar, Lene M. Favrholdt, and Kim S. Larsen. Online Unit Profit Knapsack with Untrusted Predictions. In 18th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 227, pp. 20:1-20:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boyar_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2022.20,
  author =	{Boyar, Joan and Favrholdt, Lene M. and Larsen, Kim S.},
  title =	{{Online Unit Profit Knapsack with Untrusted Predictions}},
  booktitle =	{18th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2022)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-236-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{227},
  editor =	{Czumaj, Artur and Xin, Qin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2022.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-161800},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2022.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: online algorithms, untrusted predictions, knapsack problem, competitive analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2016.21
Online Dominating Set

Authors: Joan Boyar, Stephan J. Eidenbenz, Lene M. Favrholdt, Michal Kotrbcik, and Kim S. Larsen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 53, 15th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2016)

Abstract
This paper is devoted to the online dominating set problem and its variants on trees, bipartite, bounded-degree, planar, and general graphs, distinguishing between connected and not necessarily connected graphs. We believe this paper represents the first systematic study of the effect of two limitations of online algorithms: making irrevocable decisions while not knowing the future, and being incremental, i.e., having to maintain solutions to all prefixes of the input. This is quantified through competitive analyses of online algorithms against two optimal algorithms, both knowing the entire input, but only one having to be incremental. We also consider the competitive ratio of the weaker of the two optimal algorithms against the other. In most cases, we obtain tight bounds on the competitive ratios. Our results show that requiring the graphs to be presented in a connected fashion allows the online algorithms to obtain provably better solutions. Furthermore, we get detailed information regarding the significance of the necessary requirement that online algorithms be incremental. In some cases, having to be incremental fully accounts for the online algorithm's disadvantage.
Cite as

Joan Boyar, Stephan J. Eidenbenz, Lene M. Favrholdt, Michal Kotrbcik, and Kim S. Larsen. Online Dominating Set. In 15th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 53, pp. 21:1-21:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boyar_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2016.21,
  author =	{Boyar, Joan and Eidenbenz, Stephan J. and Favrholdt, Lene M. and Kotrbcik, Michal and Larsen, Kim S.},
  title =	{{Online Dominating Set}},
  booktitle =	{15th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2016)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-011-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{53},
  editor =	{Pagh, Rasmus},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2016.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-60434},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2016.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: online algorithms, dominating set, competitive analysis, graph classes, connected graphs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2015.116
Advice Complexity for a Class of Online Problems

Authors: Joan Boyar, Lene M. Favrholdt, Christian Kudahl, and Jesper W. Mikkelsen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 30, 32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2015)

Abstract
The advice complexity of an online problem is a measure of how much knowledge of the future an online algorithm needs in order to achieve a certain competitive ratio. We determine the advice complexity of a number of hard online problems including independent set, vertex cover, dominating set and several others. These problems are hard, since a single wrong answer by the online algorithm can have devastating consequences. For each of these problems, we show that \log\left(1+\frac{(c-1)^{c-1}}{c^{c}}\right)n=\Theta (n/c) bits of advice are necessary and sufficient (up to an additive term of O(\log n)) to achieve a competitive ratio of c. This is done by introducing a new string guessing problem related to those of Emek et al. (TCS 2011) and Böckenhauer et al. (TCS 2014). It turns out that this gives a powerful but easy-to-use method for providing both upper and lower bounds on the advice complexity of an entire class of online problems. Previous results of Halldórsson et al. (TCS 2002) on online independent set, in a related model, imply that the advice complexity of the problem is \Theta (n/c). Our results improve on this by providing an exact formula for the higher-order term. Böckenhauer et al. (ISAAC 2009) gave a lower bound of \Omega (n/c) and an upper bound of O((n\log c)/c) on the advice complexity of online disjoint path allocation. We improve on the upper bound by a factor of $\log c$. For the remaining problems, no bounds on their advice complexity were previously known.
Cite as

Joan Boyar, Lene M. Favrholdt, Christian Kudahl, and Jesper W. Mikkelsen. Advice Complexity for a Class of Online Problems. In 32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 30, pp. 116-129, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boyar_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2015.116,
  author =	{Boyar, Joan and Favrholdt, Lene M. and Kudahl, Christian and Mikkelsen, Jesper W.},
  title =	{{Advice Complexity for a Class of Online Problems}},
  booktitle =	{32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2015)},
  pages =	{116--129},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-78-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{30},
  editor =	{Mayr, Ernst W. and Ollinger, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2015.116},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-49086},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2015.116},
  annote =	{Keywords: online algorithms, advice complexity, asymmetric string guessing, advice complexity class AOC, covering designs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2014.174
Online Bin Packing with Advice

Authors: Joan Boyar, Shahin Kamali, Kim S. Larsen, and Alejandro López-Ortiz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 25, 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014)

Abstract
We consider the online bin packing problem under the advice complexity model where the "online constraint" is relaxed and an algorithm receives partial information about the future requests. We provide tight upper and lower bounds for the amount of advice an algorithm needs to achieve an optimal packing. We also introduce an algorithm that, when provided with log(n)+o(log(n)) bits of advice, achieves a competitive ratio of 3/2 for the general problem. This algorithm is simple and is expected to find real-world applications. We introduce another algorithm that receives 2n+o(n) bits of advice and achieves a competitive ratio of 4/3+e. Finally, we provide a lower bound argument that implies that advice of linear size is required for an algorithm to achieve a competitive ratio better than 9/8.
Cite as

Joan Boyar, Shahin Kamali, Kim S. Larsen, and Alejandro López-Ortiz. Online Bin Packing with Advice. In 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 25, pp. 174-186, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2014)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boyar_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2014.174,
  author =	{Boyar, Joan and Kamali, Shahin and Larsen, Kim S. and L\'{o}pez-Ortiz, Alejandro},
  title =	{{Online Bin Packing with Advice}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014)},
  pages =	{174--186},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-65-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2014},
  volume =	{25},
  editor =	{Mayr, Ernst W. and Portier, Natacha},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2014.174},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-44565},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2014.174},
  annote =	{Keywords: online algorithms, advice complexity, bin packing}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 12 Document/PDF
  • 6 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 5 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Boyar, Joan
  • 4 Larsen, Kim S.
  • 3 Favrholdt, Lene M.
  • 2 Kamali, Shahin
  • 1 Balabán, Jakub
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 6 Theory of computation → Online algorithms
  • 2 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Graph algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Concurrent algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Data structures design and analysis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 6 online algorithms
  • 4 competitive analysis
  • 2 advice complexity
  • 2 online algorithms with advice
  • 1 Advice
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact