8 Search Results for "Pandey, Omkant"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.1
Amortized Locally Decodable Codes for Insertions and Deletions

Authors: Jeremiah Blocki and Justin Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 343, 6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025)

Abstract
Locally Decodable Codes (LDCs) are error correcting codes which permit the recovery of any single message symbol with a low number of queries to the codeword (the locality). Traditional LDC tradeoffs between the rate, locality, and error tolerance are undesirable even in relaxed settings where the encoder/decoder share randomness or where the channel is resource-bounded. Recent work by Blocki and Zhang initiated the study of Hamming amortized Locally Decodable Codes (aLDCs), which allow the local decoder to amortize their number of queries over the recovery of a small subset of message symbols. Surprisingly, Blocki and Zhang construct asymptotically ideal (constant rate, constant amortized locality, and constant error tolerance) Hamming aLDCs in private-key and resource-bounded settings. While this result overcame previous barriers and impossibility results for Hamming LDCs, it is not clear whether the techniques extend to Insdel LDCs. Constructing Insdel LDCs which are resilient to insertion and/or deletion errors is known to be even more challenging. For example, Gupta (STOC'24) proved that no Insdel LDC with constant rate and error tolerance exists even in relaxed settings. Our first contribution is to provide a Hamming-to-Insdel compiler which transforms any amortized Hamming LDC that satisfies a particular property (consecutive interval querying) to amortized Insdel LDC while asymptotically preserving the rate, error tolerance and amortized locality. Prior Hamming-to-Insdel compilers of Ostrovsky and Paskin-Cherniavsky (ICITS'15) and Block et al. (FSTTCS'20) worked for arbitrary Hamming LDCs, but incurred an undesirable polylogarithmic blow-up in the locality. Our second contribution is a construction of an ideal amortized Hamming LDC which satisfies our special property (consecutive interval querying) in the relaxed settings where the sender/receiver share randomness or where the channel is resource bounded. Taken together, we obtain ideal Insdel aLDCs in private-key and resource-bounded settings with constant amortized locality, constant rate and constant error tolerance. This result is surprising in light of Gupta’s (STOC'24) impossibility result which demonstrates a strong separation between locality and amortized locality for Insdel LDCs.
Cite as

Jeremiah Blocki and Justin Zhang. Amortized Locally Decodable Codes for Insertions and Deletions. In 6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 343, pp. 1:1-1:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{blocki_et_al:LIPIcs.ITC.2025.1,
  author =	{Blocki, Jeremiah and Zhang, Justin},
  title =	{{Amortized Locally Decodable Codes for Insertions and Deletions}},
  booktitle =	{6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-385-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{343},
  editor =	{Gilboa, Niv},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243518},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Amortized Locally Decodable Codes, Insertion and Deletion Errors}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39
Data Reconstruction: When You See It and When You Don't

Authors: Edith Cohen, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer, and Eliad Tsfadia

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We revisit the fundamental question of formally defining what constitutes a reconstruction attack. While often clear from the context, our exploration reveals that a precise definition is much more nuanced than it appears, to the extent that a single all-encompassing definition may not exist. Thus, we employ a different strategy and aim to "sandwich" the concept of reconstruction attacks by addressing two complementing questions: (i) What conditions guarantee that a given system is protected against such attacks? (ii) Under what circumstances does a given attack clearly indicate that a system is not protected? More specifically, - We introduce a new definitional paradigm - Narcissus Resiliency - to formulate a security definition for protection against reconstruction attacks. This paradigm has a self-referential nature that enables it to circumvent shortcomings of previously studied notions of security. Furthermore, as a side-effect, we demonstrate that Narcissus resiliency captures as special cases multiple well-studied concepts including differential privacy and other security notions of one-way functions and encryption schemes. - We formulate a link between reconstruction attacks and Kolmogorov complexity. This allows us to put forward a criterion for evaluating when such attacks are convincingly successful.
Cite as

Edith Cohen, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer, and Eliad Tsfadia. Data Reconstruction: When You See It and When You Don't. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 39:1-39:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39,
  author =	{Cohen, Edith and Kaplan, Haim and Mansour, Yishay and Moran, Shay and Nissim, Kobbi and Stemmer, Uri and Tsfadia, Eliad},
  title =	{{Data Reconstruction: When You See It and When You Don't}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226674},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, reconstruction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.27
The Randomness Complexity of Differential Privacy

Authors: Clément L. Canonne, Francis E. Su, and Salil P. Vadhan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We initiate the study of the randomness complexity of differential privacy, i.e., how many random bits an algorithm needs in order to generate accurate differentially private releases. As a test case, we focus on the task of releasing the results of d counting queries, or equivalently all one-way marginals on a d-dimensional dataset with boolean attributes. While standard differentially private mechanisms for this task have randomness complexity that grows linearly with d, we show that, surprisingly, only log₂ d+O(1) random bits (in expectation) suffice to achieve an error that depends polynomially on d (and is independent of the size n of the dataset), and furthermore this is possible with pure, unbounded differential privacy and privacy-loss parameter ε = 1/poly(d). Conversely, we show that at least log₂ d-O(1) random bits are also necessary for nontrivial accuracy, even with approximate, bounded DP, provided the privacy-loss parameters satisfy ε,δ ≤ 1/poly(d). We obtain our results by establishing a close connection between the randomness complexity of differentially private mechanisms and the geometric notion of "deterministic rounding schemes" recently introduced and studied by Vander Woude et al. (2022, 2023).
Cite as

Clément L. Canonne, Francis E. Su, and Salil P. Vadhan. The Randomness Complexity of Differential Privacy. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 27:1-27:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{canonne_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.27,
  author =	{Canonne, Cl\'{e}ment L. and Su, Francis E. and Vadhan, Salil P.},
  title =	{{The Randomness Complexity of Differential Privacy}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226556},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: differential privacy, randomness, geometry}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88
Detecting and Correcting Computationally Bounded Errors: A Simple Construction Under Minimal Assumptions

Authors: Jad Silbak and Daniel Wichs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We study error detection and error correction in a computationally bounded world, where errors are introduced by an arbitrary polynomial time adversarial channel. We consider codes where the encoding procedure uses random coins and define two distinct variants: (1) in randomized codes, fresh randomness is chosen during each encoding operation and is unknown a priori, while (2) in self-seeded codes, the randomness of the encoding procedure is fixed once upfront and is known to the adversary. In both cases, the randomness need not be known to the decoding procedure, and there is no trusted common setup between the encoder and decoder. The encoding and decoding algorithms are efficient and run in some fixed polynomial time, independent of the run time of the adversary. The parameters of standard codes for worst-case (inefficient) errors are limited by the Singleton bound: for rate R it is not possible to detect more than a 1-R fraction of errors, or uniquely correct more than a (1-R)/2 fraction of errors, and efficient codes matching this bound exist for sufficiently large alphabets. In the computationally bounded setting, we show that going beyond the Singleton bound implies one-way functions in the case of randomized codes and collision-resistant hash functions in the case of self-seeded codes. We construct randomized and self-seeded codes under these respective minimal assumptions with essentially optimal parameters over a constant-sized alphabet: - Detection: the codes have a rate R ≈ 1 while detecting a ρ ≈ 1 fraction of errors. - Correction: for any ρ < 1/2, the codes uniquely correct a ρ fraction of errors with rate R ≈ 1-ρ. Codes for computationally bounded errors were studied in several prior works starting with Lipton (STACS '94), but all such works either: (a) need some trusted common setup (e.g., public-key infrastructure, common reference string) between the encoder and decoder, or (b) only handle channels whose complexity is a prior bounded below that of the code.
Cite as

Jad Silbak and Daniel Wichs. Detecting and Correcting Computationally Bounded Errors: A Simple Construction Under Minimal Assumptions. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 88:1-88:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{silbak_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88,
  author =	{Silbak, Jad and Wichs, Daniel},
  title =	{{Detecting and Correcting Computationally Bounded Errors: A Simple Construction Under Minimal Assumptions}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{88:1--88:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227167},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.88},
  annote =	{Keywords: Error Correction, One-Way Functions, Collision Resistant Hashing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.56
Incompressible Functional Encryption

Authors: Rishab Goyal, Venkata Koppula, Mahesh Sreekumar Rajasree, and Aman Verma

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
Incompressible encryption (Dziembowski, Crypto'06; Guan, Wichs, Zhandry, Eurocrypt'22) protects from attackers that learn the entire decryption key, but cannot store the full ciphertext. In incompressible encryption, the attacker must try to compress a ciphertext within pre-specified memory bound S before receiving the secret key. In this work, we generalize the notion of incompressibility to functional encryption. In incompressible functional encryption, the adversary can corrupt non-distinguishing keys at any point, but receives the distinguishing keys only after compressing the ciphertext to within S bits. An important efficiency measure for incompressible encryption is the ciphertext-rate (i.e., rate = |m|/|ct|). We give many new results for incompressible functional encryption for circuits, from minimal assumption of (non-incompressible) functional encryption, with 1) ct-rate-1/2 and short secret keys, 2) ct-rate-1 and large secret keys. Along the way, we also give a new incompressible attribute-based encryption for circuits from standard assumptions, with ct-rate-1/2 and short secret keys. Our results achieve optimal efficiency, as incompressible attribute-based/functional encryption with ct-rate-1 as well as short secret keys has strong barriers for provable security from standard assumptions. Moreover, our assumptions are minimal as incompressible attribute-based/functional encryption are strictly stronger than their non-incompressible counterparts.
Cite as

Rishab Goyal, Venkata Koppula, Mahesh Sreekumar Rajasree, and Aman Verma. Incompressible Functional Encryption. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 56:1-56:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goyal_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.56,
  author =	{Goyal, Rishab and Koppula, Venkata and Rajasree, Mahesh Sreekumar and Verma, Aman},
  title =	{{Incompressible Functional Encryption}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{56:1--56:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.56},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226849},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.56},
  annote =	{Keywords: functional encryption, attribute-based encryption, incompressible encryption}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.28
Improved Black-Box Constructions of Composable Secure Computation

Authors: Rohit Chatterjee, Xiao Liang, and Omkant Pandey

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 168, 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020)

Abstract
We close the gap between black-box and non-black-box constructions of composable secure multiparty computation in the plain model under the minimal assumption of semi-honest oblivious transfer. The notion of protocol composition we target is angel-based security, or more precisely, security with super-polynomial helpers. In this notion, both the simulator and the adversary are given access to an oracle called an angel that can perform some predefined super-polynomial time task. Angel-based security maintains the attractive properties of the universal composition framework while providing meaningful security guarantees in complex environments without having to trust anyone. Angel-based security can be achieved using non-black-box constructions in max(R_OT,Õ(log n)) rounds where R_OT is the round-complexity of semi-honest oblivious transfer. However, current best known black-box constructions under the same assumption require max(R_OT,Õ(log² n)) rounds. If R_OT is a constant, the gap between non-black-box and black-box constructions can be a multiplicative factor log n. We close this gap by presenting a max(R_OT,Õ(log n)) round black-box construction. We achieve this result by constructing constant-round 1-1 CCA-secure commitments assuming only black-box access to one-way functions.
Cite as

Rohit Chatterjee, Xiao Liang, and Omkant Pandey. Improved Black-Box Constructions of Composable Secure Computation. In 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 168, pp. 28:1-28:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chatterjee_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.28,
  author =	{Chatterjee, Rohit and Liang, Xiao and Pandey, Omkant},
  title =	{{Improved Black-Box Constructions of Composable Secure Computation}},
  booktitle =	{47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-138-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{168},
  editor =	{Czumaj, Artur and Dawar, Anuj and Merelli, Emanuela},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-124351},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: Secure Multi-Party Computation, Black-Box, Composable, Non-Malleable}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.29
Do Distributed Differentially-Private Protocols Require Oblivious Transfer?

Authors: Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana, Ilya Mironov, Omkant Pandey, and Amit Sahai

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)

Abstract
We study the cryptographic complexity of two-party differentially-private protocols for a large natural class of boolean functionalities. Information theoretically, McGregor et al. [FOCS 2010] and Goyal et al. [Crypto 2013] demonstrated several functionalities for which the maximal possible accuracy in the distributed setting is significantly lower than that in the client-server setting. Goyal et al. [Crypto 2013] further showed that "highly accurate" protocols in the distributed setting for any non-trivial functionality in fact imply the existence of one-way functions. However, it has remained an open problem to characterize the exact cryptographic complexity of this class. In particular, we know that semi-honest oblivious transfer helps obtain optimally accurate distributed differential privacy. But we do not know whether the reverse is true. We study the following question: Does the existence of optimally accurate distributed differentially private protocols for any class of functionalities imply the existence of oblivious transfer (or equivalently secure multi-party computation)? We resolve this question in the affirmative for the class of boolean functionalities that contain an XOR embedded on adjacent inputs. We give a reduction from oblivious transfer to: - Any distributed optimally accurate epsilon-differentially private protocol with epsilon > 0 computing a functionality with a boolean XOR embedded on adjacent inputs. - Any distributed non-optimally accurate epsilon-differentially private protocol with epsilon > 0, for a constant range of non-optimal accuracies and constant range of values of epsilon, computing a functionality with a boolean XOR embedded on adjacent inputs. Enroute to proving these results, we demonstrate a connection between optimally-accurate twoparty differentially-private protocols for functions with a boolean XOR embedded on adjacent inputs, and noisy channels, which were shown by Crépeau and Kilian [FOCS 1988] to be sufficient for oblivious transfer.
Cite as

Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana, Ilya Mironov, Omkant Pandey, and Amit Sahai. Do Distributed Differentially-Private Protocols Require Oblivious Transfer?. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 29:1-29:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goyal_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.29,
  author =	{Goyal, Vipul and Khurana, Dakshita and Mironov, Ilya and Pandey, Omkant and Sahai, Amit},
  title =	{{Do Distributed Differentially-Private Protocols Require Oblivious Transfer?}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-63080},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Oblivious Transfer, Distributed Differential Privacy, Noisy Channels, Weak Noisy Channels}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31
Block-Wise Non-Malleable Codes

Authors: Nishanth Chandran, Vipul Goyal, Pratyay Mukherjee, Omkant Pandey, and Jalaj Upadhyay

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)

Abstract
Non-malleable codes, introduced by Dziembowski, Pietrzak, and Wichs (ICS'10) provide the guarantee that if a codeword c of a message m, is modified by a tampering function f to c', then c' either decodes to m or to "something unrelated" to m. In recent literature, a lot of focus has been on explicitly constructing such codes against a large and natural class of tampering functions such as split-state model in which the tampering function operates on different parts of the codeword independently. In this work, we consider a stronger adversarial model called block-wise tampering model, in which we allow tampering to depend on more than one block: if a codeword consists of two blocks c = (c1, c2), then the first tampering function f1 could produce a tampered part c'_1 = f1(c1) and the second tampering function f2 could produce c'_2 = f2(c1, c2) depending on both c2 and c1. The notion similarly extends to multiple blocks where tampering of block ci could happen with the knowledge of all cj for j <= i. We argue this is a natural notion where, for example, the blocks are sent one by one and the adversary must send the tampered block before it gets the next block. A little thought reveals that it is impossible to construct such codes that are non-malleable (in the standard sense) against such a powerful adversary: indeed, upon receiving the last block, an adversary could decode the entire codeword and then can tamper depending on the message. In light of this impossibility, we consider a natural relaxation called non-malleable codes with replacement which requires the adversary to produce not only related but also a valid codeword in order to succeed. Unfortunately, we show that even this relaxed definition is not achievable in the information-theoretic setting (i.e., when the tampering functions can be unbounded) which implies that we must turn our attention towards computationally bounded adversaries. As our main result, we show how to construct a block-wise non-malleable code (BNMC) from sub-exponentially hard one-way permutations. We provide an interesting connection between BNMC and non-malleable commitments. We show that any BNMC can be converted into a nonmalleable (w.r.t. opening) commitment scheme. Our techniques, quite surprisingly, give rise to a non-malleable commitment scheme (secure against so-called synchronizing adversaries), in which only the committer sends messages. We believe this result to be of independent interest. In the other direction, we show that any non-interactive non-malleable (w.r.t. opening) commitment can be used to construct BNMC only with 2 blocks. Unfortunately, such commitment scheme exists only under highly non-standard assumptions (adaptive one-way functions) and hence can not substitute our main construction.
Cite as

Nishanth Chandran, Vipul Goyal, Pratyay Mukherjee, Omkant Pandey, and Jalaj Upadhyay. Block-Wise Non-Malleable Codes. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 31:1-31:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chandran_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31,
  author =	{Chandran, Nishanth and Goyal, Vipul and Mukherjee, Pratyay and Pandey, Omkant and Upadhyay, Jalaj},
  title =	{{Block-Wise Non-Malleable Codes}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-63102},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non-malleable codes, Non-malleable commitments, Block-wise Tampering, Complexity-leveraging}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 8 Document/PDF
  • 5 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 5 2025
  • 1 2020
  • 2 2016

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Pandey, Omkant
  • 2 Goyal, Vipul
  • 1 Blocki, Jeremiah
  • 1 Canonne, Clément L.
  • 1 Chandran, Nishanth
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 8 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Mathematics of computing
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Coding theory
  • 1 Security and privacy
  • 1 Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy
  • 1 Security and privacy → Mathematical foundations of cryptography
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 differential privacy
  • 1 Amortized Locally Decodable Codes
  • 1 Black-Box
  • 1 Block-wise Tampering
  • 1 Collision Resistant Hashing
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact