23 Search Results for "Pfenning, Frank"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.37
Towards the Type Safety of Pure Subtype Systems

Authors: Valentin Pasquale and Álvaro García-Pérez

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Hutchins' Pure Subtype Systems (PSS) offer a unified framework for types and terms, promising significant advancements in language design for features like dependent types and higher-order subtyping. However, the theory has been hampered by a critical gap: a proof of type safety has remained an open problem for over a decade. The original attempt to prove this property relied on the conjectured commutativity of two fundamental reduction relations, equivalence and subtyping. Proving transitivity elimination, however, requires this commutativity, a property that is notoriously difficult to establish for higher-order subtyping systems. In this paper, we address this issue by introducing Machine-Based PSS (MPSS), a novel reformulation of the original system. MPSS integrates a continuation stack mechanism, reminiscent of the Krivine Abstract Machine, to keep track of arguments that are passed during function application, enabling more fine-grained reductions. This architectural change exposes crucial intermediate reduction steps that were absent in the original PSS. The primary contribution of our work is a direct proof that the equivalence and subtyping reductions in MPSS commute. This result formally establishes transitivity elimination, which is the cornerstone of the inversion lemma required for type safety. We conclude by outlining a pathway from our foundational result to a complete, type-safe system, thereby paving the way for the practical realization of PSS-based languages.
Cite as

Valentin Pasquale and Álvaro García-Pérez. Towards the Type Safety of Pure Subtype Systems. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 37:1-37:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pasquale_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.37,
  author =	{Pasquale, Valentin and Garc{\'\i}a-P\'{e}rez, \'{A}lvaro},
  title =	{{Towards the Type Safety of Pure Subtype Systems}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254626},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculus, Pure subtype systems, Dependent types, Higher-order subtyping, Type safety}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13
Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized

Authors: Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Barendregt’s book on the untyped λ-calculus refines the inconsistent view of β-divergence as representation of the undefined via the key concept of head reduction. In this paper, we put together recent revisitations of some key theorems laid out in Barendregt’s book, and we formalize them in the Abella proof assistant. Our work provides a compact and refreshed presentation of the core of the book. The formalization faithfully mimics pen-and-paper proofs. Two interesting aspects are the manipulation of contexts for the study of contextual equivalence and a formal alternative to the informal trick at work in Takahashi’s proof of the genericity lemma. As a by-product, we obtain an alternative definition of contextual equivalence that does not mention contexts.
Cite as

Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs. Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 13:1-13:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lancelot_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13,
  author =	{Lancelot, Adrienne and Accattoli, Beniamino and Vemclefs, Maxime},
  title =	{{Barendregt’s Theory of the \lambda-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246114},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, head reduction, equational theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.11
Animating MRBNFs: Truly Modular Binding-Aware Datatypes in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Jan van Brügge, Andrei Popescu, and Dmitriy Traytel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Nominal Isabelle provides powerful tools for meta-theoretic reasoning about syntax of logics or programming languages, in which variables are bound. It has been instrumental to major verification successes, such as Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. However, the existing tooling is not compositional. In particular, it does not support nested recursion, linear binding patterns, or infinitely branching syntax. These limitations are fundamental in the way nominal datatypes and functions on them are constructed within Nominal Isabelle. Taking advantage of recent theoretical advancements that overcome these limitations through a modular approach using the concept of map-restricted bounded natural functor (MRBNF), we develop and implement a new definitional package for binding-aware datatypes in Isabelle/HOL, called MrBNF. We describe the journey from the user specification to the end-product types, constants and theorems the tool generates. We validate MrBNF in two formalization case studies that so far were out of reach of nominal approaches: (1) Mazza’s isomorphism between the finitary and the infinitary affine λ-calculus, and (2) the POPLmark 2B challenge, which involves non-free binders for linear pattern matching.
Cite as

Jan van Brügge, Andrei Popescu, and Dmitriy Traytel. Animating MRBNFs: Truly Modular Binding-Aware Datatypes in Isabelle/HOL. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 11:1-11:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vanbrugge_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.11,
  author =	{van Br\"{u}gge, Jan and Popescu, Andrei and Traytel, Dmitriy},
  title =	{{Animating MRBNFs: Truly Modular Binding-Aware Datatypes in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246091},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: syntax with bindings, datatypes, inductive predicates, Isabelle/HOL}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14
Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean

Authors: Chase Norman and Jeremy Avigad

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Canonical is a solver for type inhabitation in dependent type theory, that is, the problem of producing a term of a given type. We present a Lean tactic which invokes Canonical to generate proof terms and synthesize programs. The tactic supports higher-order and dependently-typed goals, structural recursion over indexed inductive types, and definitional equality. Canonical finds proofs for 84% of Natural Number Game problems in 51 seconds total.
Cite as

Chase Norman and Jeremy Avigad. Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 14:1-14:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{norman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14,
  author =	{Norman, Chase and Avigad, Jeremy},
  title =	{{Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246128},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automated Reasoning, Interactive Theorem Proving, Dependent Type Theory, Inhabitation, Unification, Program Synthesis, Formal Methods}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.30
Open Bisimilarity for the π-Calculus with Mismatch

Authors: Tiange Liu, Alwen Tiu, and Ross Horne

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)

Abstract
Open bisimilarity is an equivalence relation for the π-calculus that is also congruence, making it suitable to use in compositional reasoning for mobile processes and communication protocols. The original definition of open bisimilarity, due to Sangiorgi, does not account for the mismatch operator, that is crucial in modelling real-world protocols. When mismatch is present, the congruence property no longer holds for open bisimilarity. In a LICS 2018 paper, Horne et al. proposed an extension of open bisimilarity, using a history-indexed class of relations, to address this problem. That definition, however, turns out to be non-compositional as we shall demonstrate in this paper. This paper presents a new definition of open bisimilarity in the π-calculus that incorporates mismatch. This is achieved by augmenting the transition semantics of the π-calculus with an explicit assumption about name distinctions, and by requiring that open bisimulation to be closed under an arbitary extension of the name distinctions assumption. We then prove that the resulting open bisimilarity is both an equivalence relation and a congruence.
Cite as

Tiange Liu, Alwen Tiu, and Ross Horne. Open Bisimilarity for the π-Calculus with Mismatch. In 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 348, pp. 30:1-30:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{liu_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.30,
  author =	{Liu, Tiange and Tiu, Alwen and Horne, Ross},
  title =	{{Open Bisimilarity for the \pi-Calculus with Mismatch}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-389-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{348},
  editor =	{Bouyer, Patricia and van de Pol, Jaco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239805},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: mismatch, open bisimilarity, pi calculus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.4
Substructural Parametricity

Authors: C. B. Aberlé, Karl Crary, Chris Martens, and Frank Pfenning

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
Ordered, linear, and other substructural type systems allow us to expose deep properties of programs at the syntactic level of types. In this paper, we develop a family of unary logical relations that allow us to prove consequences of parametricity for a range of substructural type systems. A key idea is to parameterize the relation by an algebra, which we exemplify with a monoid and commutative monoid to interpret ordered and linear type systems, respectively. We prove the fundamental theorem of logical relations and apply it to deduce extensional properties of inhabitants of certain types. Examples include demonstrating that the ordered types for list append and reversal are inhabited by exactly one function, as are types of some tree traversals. Similarly, the linear type of the identity function on lists is inhabited only by permutations of the input. Our most advanced example shows that the ordered type of the list fold function is inhabited only by the fold function.
Cite as

C. B. Aberlé, Karl Crary, Chris Martens, and Frank Pfenning. Substructural Parametricity. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 4:1-4:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aberle_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.4,
  author =	{Aberl\'{e}, C. B. and Crary, Karl and Martens, Chris and Pfenning, Frank},
  title =	{{Substructural Parametricity}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236193},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Substructural type systems, logical relations, ordered logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18
Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results

Authors: Serdar Erbatur, Andrew M. Marshall, Paliath Narendran, and Christophe Ringeissen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
The research area of cryptographic protocol analysis contains a number of innovative algorithms and procedures for checking various security properties of protocols. Most of these procedures focus on solving one of several "knowledge problems" that model intruder knowledge. Solving these problems can demonstrate the ability of the intruder to obtain some forbidden information of the protocol, such as secret keys. Two important examples of these problems are the deduction problem and the static equivalence problem. Deduction is concerned with the ability to derive a term from a set of terms (or knowledge) obtained from the observation of a protocol instance. Static equivalence, on the other hand, is concerned with distinguishing between two runs of a protocol based on two sets of knowledge. These two knowledge problems at first inspection appear to be very close to the older automated reasoning problems of matching and unification. However, this first impression is wrong, and there have been a few results that have shown theories where one problem, such as unification, is undecidable but another problem, such as deduction, is decidable. These existing dichotomy results were, however, incomplete, and not all cases had been examined, thus leaving the possibility of some connection between the problems for those unexamined cases. In this paper, we consider the missing dichotomy cases. For each of the remaining cases, we demonstrate a theory that separates the two problems. In addition, once the dichotomy results are completed, it leaves open the question of the existence of non-trivial classes of theories for which all four of the problems are decidable. One example for which this is true is the well-known class of subterm convergent term rewrite systems. In this paper, we develop another example, a class of restrictive permutative theories for which all problems are likewise decidable.
Cite as

Serdar Erbatur, Andrew M. Marshall, Paliath Narendran, and Christophe Ringeissen. Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 18:1-18:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{erbatur_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18,
  author =	{Erbatur, Serdar and Marshall, Andrew M. and Narendran, Paliath and Ringeissen, Christophe},
  title =	{{Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236331},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Problems, Unification, Matching, Decidability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.29
Linear Logic Using Negative Connectives

Authors: Dale Miller

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
In linear logic, the invertibility of a connective’s right-introduction rule is equivalent to the non-invertibility of its left-introduction rule. This duality motivates the concept of polarity: a connective is termed negative if its right-introduction rule is invertible, and positive otherwise. A two-sided sequent calculus for first-order linear logic featuring only negative connectives exhibits a compelling proof theory. Proof search in such a system unfolds through alternating phases of invertible (right-introduction) rules and non-invertible (left-introduction) rules, mirroring the processes of goal-reduction and backchaining, respectively. These phases are formalized here using the framework of multifocused proofs. We analyze linear logic by dissecting it into three sublogics: L₀ (first-order intuitionistic logic with conjunction, implication, and universal quantification); L₁ (an extension of L₀ incorporating linear implication which preserves its intuitionistic nature); and L₂ (which includes multiplicative falsity ⊥ and encompasses classical linear logic). It is worth noting that the single-conclusion restriction on sequents, a constraint imposed by Gentzen, is not a prerequisite for defining intuitionistic logic proofs within this framework, as it emerges naturally by restricting the formulas to those of L₀ and L₁. While multifocused proofs of L₂ sequents can accommodate parallel applications of left-introduction rules, proofs of L₀ and L₁ sequents cannot leverage such parallel rule applications. This notion of parallelism within proofs enables a novel approach to handling disjunctions and existential quantifiers in the natural deduction system for intuitionistic logic.
Cite as

Dale Miller. Linear Logic Using Negative Connectives. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 29:1-29:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{miller:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.29,
  author =	{Miller, Dale},
  title =	{{Linear Logic Using Negative Connectives}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236442},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Linear logic, multifocused proofs, sequent calculus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.24
Fair Termination of Asynchronous Binary Sessions

Authors: Luca Padovani and Gianluigi Zavattaro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
We study a theory of asynchronous session types ensuring that well-typed processes terminate under a suitable fairness assumption. Fair termination entails starvation freedom and orphan message freedom namely that all messages, including those that are produced early taking advantage of asynchrony, are eventually consumed. The theory is based on a novel fair asynchronous subtyping relation for session types that is coarser than the existing ones. The type system is also the first of its kind that is firmly rooted in linear logic: fair asynchronous subtyping is incorporated as a natural generalization of the cut and axiom rules of linear logic and asynchronous communication is modeled through a suitable set of commuting conversions and of deep cut reductions in linear logic proofs.
Cite as

Luca Padovani and Gianluigi Zavattaro. Fair Termination of Asynchronous Binary Sessions. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 24:1-24:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{padovani_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.24,
  author =	{Padovani, Luca and Zavattaro, Gianluigi},
  title =	{{Fair Termination of Asynchronous Binary Sessions}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233169},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Binary sessions, fair asynchronous subtyping, fair termination, linear logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17
Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes

Authors: Juan C. Jaramillo and Jorge A. Pérez

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Deadlock freedom is a crucial property for message-passing programs. Over the years, several different type systems for concurrent processes that ensure deadlock freedom have been proposed; this diversity raises the question of how they compare. We address this question, considering two type systems not covered in prior work: Kokke et al.’s HCP, a type system based on a linear logic with hypersequents, and Padovani’s priority-based type system for asynchronous processes, dubbed 𝖯. Their distinctive features make formal comparisons relevant and challenging. Our findings are two-fold: (1) the hypersequent setting does not drastically change the class of deadlock-free processes induced by linear logic, and (2) we relate the classes of deadlock-free processes induced by HCP and 𝖯. We prove that our results hold under both synchronous and asynchronous communication. Our results provide new insights into the essential mechanisms involved in statically avoiding deadlocks in concurrency.
Cite as

Juan C. Jaramillo and Jorge A. Pérez. Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 17:1-17:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jaramillo_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17,
  author =	{Jaramillo, Juan C. and P\'{e}rez, Jorge A.},
  title =	{{Contrasting Deadlock-Free Session Processes}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233103},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: session types, process calculi, deadlock freedom}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32
Compositional Static Value Analysis for Higher-Order Numerical Programs

Authors: Milla Valnet, Raphaël Monat, and Antoine Miné

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Static analyzers have been successfully developed to detect runtime errors in many languages. However, the automatic analysis of functional languages remains a challenge due to their recursive functions, recursive algebraic data types, and higher-order functions. Classic type systems provide compositional methods that are in general not precise enough to prove the absence of runtime errors such as assertion failures. At the other end of the spectrum, deductive methods are more expressive but may require user guidance to prove invariants. Our work describes a static value analysis by abstract interpretation for a higher-order pure functional language. This analysis provides a sound and automatic approach to discover invariants and prevent assertion and match failures. We have designed a compositional analysis: functions are analyzed only once, at their definition site, generating a summary of their behavior. The summaries can be viewed as input-output relations expressed with relational abstract domains. We present two new abstract domains. A first abstract domain summarizes recursive algebraic data types. A second abstract domain lifts existing disjunctive relational summaries to higher-order by formalizing them as domains able to abstract higher-order functions. Both abstractions are parameterized by the abstractions of basic types (strings, integers, ...). Thanks to this parametric nature, both domains can be combined, allowing the analysis of higher-order functions manipulating algebraic data types and, conversely, algebraic data types using functions as first-class values. We have implemented this analysis in the open-source MOPSA platform. Preliminary evaluation confirms the precision of our approach on a set of 40 handwritten toy programs as well as 20 programs from the state-of-the-art Salto analyzer benchmark.
Cite as

Milla Valnet, Raphaël Monat, and Antoine Miné. Compositional Static Value Analysis for Higher-Order Numerical Programs. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 32:1-32:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{valnet_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32,
  author =	{Valnet, Milla and Monat, Rapha\"{e}l and Min\'{e}, Antoine},
  title =	{{Compositional Static Value Analysis for Higher-Order Numerical Programs}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233249},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Static Value Analysis, Functional Programming, Abstract Interpretation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES.10.1.2
Towards a Coq-verified Chain of Esterel Semantics

Authors: Lionel Rieg and Gérard Berry

Published in: LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract
This article focuses on formally specifying and verifying the chain of formal semantics of the Esterel synchronous programming language using the Coq proof assistant. In particular, in addition to the standard logical (LBS) semantics, constructive semantics (CBS) and constructive state semantics (CSS), we introduce a novel microstep semantics that gets rid of the Must/Can potential function pair of the constructive semantics and can be viewed as an abstract version of Esterel’s circuit semantics used by compilers to generate software code and hardware designs. The article also comes with formal proofs in Coq of the equivalence between the CBS and CSS semantics and of the refinement of the CSS by the microstep semantics, except for the loop construct of Esterel.
Cite as

Lionel Rieg and Gérard Berry. Towards a Coq-verified Chain of Esterel Semantics. In LITES, Volume 10, Issue 1 (2025). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 2:1-2:54, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{rieg_et_al:LITES.10.1.2,
  author =	{Rieg, Lionel and Berry, G\'{e}rard},
  title =	{{Towards a Coq-verified Chain of Esterel Semantics}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{2:1--2:54},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{10},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES.10.1.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230144},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES.10.1.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Esterel programming language, formal verification, Coq proof assistant}
}
Document
Database Theory in Action
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.34
Database Theory in Action: Search-Based Program Optimization

Authors: Yihong Zhang, Dan Suciu, Yisu Remy Wang, and Max Willsey

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 328, 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)

Abstract
Recent work in programming languages developed an approach to term rewritings based on equality saturation (EqSat), which, instead of applying destructively the rewrite rules, maintains all equivalent expressions in a structure called an E-graph. This paper describes two surprising connections between EqSat and databases, going both ways. On one hand equality saturation can be viewed as a query evaluation problem, with great benefits. On the other hand, most sophisticated SQL query optimizers are based on the Volcano/Cascades framework which, we explain, is a variant of EqSat.
Cite as

Yihong Zhang, Dan Suciu, Yisu Remy Wang, and Max Willsey. Database Theory in Action: Search-Based Program Optimization. In 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 328, pp. 34:1-34:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhang_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.34,
  author =	{Zhang, Yihong and Suciu, Dan and Wang, Yisu Remy and Willsey, Max},
  title =	{{Database Theory in Action: Search-Based Program Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:6},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-364-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{328},
  editor =	{Roy, Sudeepa and Kara, Ahmet},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-229759},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Query optimization, program optimization, Cascades framework, equality saturation, Datalog}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.32
A Mixed Linear and Graded Logic: Proofs, Terms, and Models

Authors: Victoria Vollmer, Danielle Marshall, Harley Eades III, and Dominic Orchard

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
Graded modal logics generalise standard modal logics via families of modalities indexed by an algebraic structure whose operations mediate between the different modalities. The graded "of-course" modality !_r captures how many times a proposition is used and has an analogous interpretation to the of-course modality from linear logic; the of-course modality from linear logic can be modelled by a linear exponential comonad and graded of-course can be modelled by a graded linear exponential comonad. Benton showed in his seminal paper on Linear/Non-Linear logic that the of-course modality can be split into two modalities connecting intuitionistic logic with linear logic, forming a symmetric monoidal adjunction. Later, Fujii et al. demonstrated that every graded comonad can be decomposed into an adjunction and a "strict action". We give a similar result to Benton, leveraging Fujii et al.’s decomposition, showing that graded modalities can be split into two modalities connecting a graded logic with a graded linear logic. We propose a sequent calculus, its proof theory and categorical model, and a natural deduction system which we show is isomorphic to the sequent calculus system. Interestingly, our system can also be understood as Linear/Non-Linear logic composed with an action that adds the grading, further illuminating the shared principles between linear logic and a class of graded modal logics.
Cite as

Victoria Vollmer, Danielle Marshall, Harley Eades III, and Dominic Orchard. A Mixed Linear and Graded Logic: Proofs, Terms, and Models. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 32:1-32:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vollmer_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.32,
  author =	{Vollmer, Victoria and Marshall, Danielle and Eades III, Harley and Orchard, Dominic},
  title =	{{A Mixed Linear and Graded Logic: Proofs, Terms, and Models}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227892},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: linear logic, graded modal logic, adjoint decomposition}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.42
Unifying Sequent Systems for Gödel-Löb Provability Logic via Syntactic Transformations

Authors: Tim S. Lyon

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
We demonstrate the inter-translatability of proofs between the most prominent sequent-based formalisms for Gödel-Löb provability logic. In particular, we consider Sambin and Valentini’s sequent system GL_{seq}, Shamkanov’s non-wellfounded and cyclic sequent systems GL_∞ and GL_{circ}, Poggiolesi’s tree-hypersequent system CSGL, and Negri’s labeled sequent system G3GL. Shamkanov provided proof-theoretic correspondences between GL_{seq}, GL_∞, and GL_{circ}, and Goré and Ramanayake showed how to transform proofs between CSGL and G3GL, however, the exact nature of proof transformations between the former three systems and the latter two systems has remained an open problem. We solve this open problem by showing how to restructure tree-hypersequent proofs into an end-active form and introduce a novel linearization technique that transforms such proofs into linear nested sequent proofs. As a result, we obtain a new proof-theoretic tool for extracting linear nested sequent systems from tree-hypersequent systems, which yields the first cut-free linear nested sequent calculus LNGL for Gödel-Löb provability logic. We show how to transform proofs in LNGL into a certain normal form, where proofs repeat in stages of modal and local rule applications, and which are translatable into GL_{seq} and G3GL proofs. These new syntactic transformations, together with those mentioned above, establish full proof-theoretic correspondences between GL_{seq}, GL_∞, GL_{circ}, CSGL, G3GL, and LNGL while also giving (to the best of the author’s knowledge) the first constructive proof mappings between structural (viz. labeled, tree-hypersequent, and linear nested sequent) systems and a cyclic sequent system.
Cite as

Tim S. Lyon. Unifying Sequent Systems for Gödel-Löb Provability Logic via Syntactic Transformations. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 42:1-42:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lyon:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.42,
  author =	{Lyon, Tim S.},
  title =	{{Unifying Sequent Systems for G\"{o}del-L\"{o}b Provability Logic via Syntactic Transformations}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227992},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: Cyclic proof, G\"{o}del-L\"{o}b logic, Labeled sequent, Linear nested sequent, Modal logic, Non-wellfounded proof, Proof theory, Proof transformation, Tree-hypersequent}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 23 Document/PDF
  • 14 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 14 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2022
  • 3 2020
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 9 Pfenning, Frank
  • 3 Toninho, Bernardo
  • 2 Caires, Luís
  • 2 Das, Ankush
  • 2 DeYoung, Henry
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 22 LIPIcs
  • 1 LITES

  • Refine by Classification
  • 6 Theory of computation → Linear logic
  • 6 Theory of computation → Process calculi
  • 5 Theory of computation → Proof theory
  • 4 Computing methodologies → Concurrent programming languages
  • 4 Theory of computation → Type structures
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Session Types
  • 3 linear logic
  • 2 Functional Programming
  • 2 Refinement Types
  • 2 Unification
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact